Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Battered American Consumer: Even the Upper-Middle Class Is Feeling Economic Pain

By Kathleen Connell, Christian Science Monitor. Posted August 20, 2008.


Consumer spending is starting to play a lesser role in our economy, as households -- even wealthy ones -- downsize their lifestyles.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Kathleen Connell

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Bad news continues to batter the American consumer, from negative home equity to weak retail sales and rising claims for unemployment benefits.

One in 3 homeowners who purchased homes since 2003 now owe more than what the property is worth, according to Zillow.com, an Internet service that values more than 80 million homes. The numbers are even more dismal for those who bought in 2006, with 45 percent now experiencing negative home equity.

Equity holdings by households offer no cushion, falling a stunning 41 percent in value for the first quarter of 2008, according to the Federal Reserve's Flow of Funds Report.

Announcements of Wall Street layoffs, bankruptcies of major US retail outlets, and even the decision by Starbucks to close 600 outlets has agitated Americans regarding their future employment.

Reflecting the collapse in housing and equity values, household net worth has dropped for two consecutive quarters, as consumers increasingly depend on credit cards and consumer loans to maintain their lifestyles.

Growing numbers of economists believe that America is now in a transformational economy, where consumer spending may play a lesser role, as households belatedly recognize the need to "right size" their lifestyles. For many families, comparison shopping has become an essential practice.

The mood of economic unease has encouraged even the wealthiest 10 percent of Americans to reconsider their spending, which in 2006 represented 1 out of every 4 dollars spent. The Harrison Group, a market-research consultancy firm, and American Express Publishing found in a June survey that 80 percent of these higher-income households are now looking closely at spending, up from 68 percent in April.

"Even the upper-middle class -- with disposable incomes of $100,000 ... are fearful for their future and concerned whether they can weather the economic storm, continuing to live the lifestyle they are currently enjoying," says Burr Brown, vice president at Harrison. "They have become savvy consumers, looking for value." The survey found 82 percent now waited for sales before buying preferred-brand products.

One sign of thriftier times: IKEA, the Swedish home-furnishings retailer, has grown from 15 stores in 2003 to 35 stores in 2008, recently opening its first US factory and two distribution centers. "IKEA is broadening its customer spectrum with growing numbers of higher income families," says Joseph Roth, the firm's director of public affairs.

Crystal Clayton and Dan Williams, an engaged couple, both IT professionals from Bowie, Md., are regular customers.

"We get the style without spending the money," says Ms. Clayton, joking, "IKEA allows me to have champagne tastes on a Coca-Cola budget." Dan is pragmatic in explaining his more mass-market shopping behavior. "I like to watch my money so that 10 years from today, we have reached our financial goals," he says. "It's a simple return-on-dollars issue for me."

Smart consumers should accept that the economy's challenges are long term, calling for a major downshift in spending. Current borrowing and debt levels are unsustainable. Recognizing the economy's new challenges, spending less will become a necessity. Consider taking the following steps:

  • Recalculate your net worth, given adverse housing, employment, and investment realities. This can help you avoid overextension based on a too-rosy view. Check out a net-worth calculator at Bankrate.com.
  • Redefine your long-term financial goals for savings, healthcare, education, and homeownership assuming continued economic volatility -- and keeping in mind rising outlay requirements on many fronts. For more information on specific important topics, visit MyMoney.gov.
  • Set lifestyle priorities, opting for a life with fewer consumer goods. Separate needed purchases from impulse purchases. See discussions and tips at TotallyFrugal.com.
  • Challenge your friends to join you in "value added" activities -- local and low-cost, or free -- that do not require you to purchase anything. Search at Free-Attractions.com.
  • Visit secondhand stores or discount retailers and delight in your new "return on dollars" philosophy.
  • Embrace this downsizing mentality -- it's the new "cool."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, consumer spending

Dr. Kathleen Connell is a professor at Haas Graduate Business School, University of California, Berkeley

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Only at Berkeley
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 20, 2008 2:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cal-Berkeley has long been associated with detached loopiness but this one takes the cake. The answer my deeply-suffering working class Americans is not homelessness, joblessness, lack of healthcare, lack of any savings whatsoever, outrageous gas prices, outsourcing, takeovers, mergers, closings, indignity, racism, police state, denial of access to the courts and jury trials, corrupt congress, corrupt Supreme Court, utterly criminal-laden White House and Congress, no......look to Sweden and its expansion into the penal colony and think IKEA purchasing and pooling everything that you don't have. And we wonder why dumb and dumber trump education and elevate McCain, Bush and their progeny!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Only at Berkeley Posted by: badkitty
Be like the British, spend, spend, spend!
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 20, 2008 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It may be a credit crunch, but you wouldn't know it in the UK: people are spending like mad. Despite being the most indebted people in human history (even worse per person than the US), Brits know you can just take equity out of your house and spend it on some shit. They also know once the sparks fly in Iran, the government will hav to create another bubble to inflate its way out of the crisis. This will create more money-making opportunities. So, relax, and shop!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Idiot savants
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Aug 20, 2008 3:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The UMC are a fascinating bunch. They're smart enough to get through med school, law school, MBA programs, and design info. systems for large companies. Yet they seem completely oblivious to the fact that they are only one or two paychecks apart from those below them on the income scale....Or worse, especially when you consider their spending habits.

Hence, even as they are forced out of their McMansions and onto the street, they will cling to the so-called American Dream like a frightened child to a security blanket. They will keep voting Republican, supporting tax cuts for the top 1%, and will look down their noses at the rest of the "help", even as they stand in the same unemployment lines, and possibly soup lines.

And now they will apparently be getting penny-pinching tips from articles like this, because they have no survival skills. Here's one: Order your latte without whipped cream on top, and bring your own can of whipped cream from the discount market.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Idiot savants Posted by: KDelphi5950
» RE: Idiot savants Posted by: Parcival01
» RE: Idiot savants Posted by: EJLima
The ultimate irony
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 20, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My wife and I have been married 50 years, and following two successful careers, we're back to living the way we did right after our wedding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I had a wife like that too, once... Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
And I should care about the upper middle class... why?
Posted by: Farasien on Aug 20, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are the assholes who voted in bush- TWICE- are driving gas-sucking SUV road barges, helping to keep us enslaved to the Saudis, these are the bastards having families with 5+ kids, contributing mightily to the overpopulation problem which underlies everything else, who took out half-million dollar ARM loans which the federal government is about to subsidize-which means me and you, John Q Taxpayer are about to buy thanks to the new housing legislation passed only a few weeks back, the list goes on...

As far as I'm concerned, the idiocy, greed and arrogance of the UMC are amongst the major reasons we're IN this damn mess to begin with. Let them eat dirt like the rest of us, the filthy little people they helped the robber barons screw over. I hope they like the taste, they deserve every damn bite.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You nailed it! Posted by: Bobsays
» The grapes are so sour they're poisonous. Posted by: andabottleof_rum
gimme a break...
Posted by: Moira61 on Aug 20, 2008 5:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the poor UMC!! Having to buy IKEA! The indignity of it all! Screw these people. Having to lower yourself to buy Ikea doesn't exactly tell me and my working class brethren that you're feeling any pain. These assholes vote republican every time - they deserve every "hardship" they may experience.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its a Collection Good Tips
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 20, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This little list should be able to help anyone in a bad economic situation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Symptomatic though not tragic
Posted by: brunowe on Aug 20, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have some sympathy with the "smallest-violin-in-the-world" comments regarding the UMC adopting less ostentatious spending habits.

However, the fact that they are doing so is useful because consumption had been the engine of our economy. The fact that said engine is seizing up even at the UMC level is useful to know.

To paraphrase a statement, if the UMC has a cold, those less well off probably have the flu.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Problem With the Upper Middle Class
Posted by: snax on Aug 20, 2008 7:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is that they have only recently begun to feel the effects of our economy turning sour. As such, they will still believe lies of the regressive conservatives montra that lower taxes for the rich and corporations, coupled with more drilling and free trade, will dig them out of it. They have not had the time nor inclination to investigate the issues themselves, but instead, have trusted the spinning, fact omitting, and outright lying conserative radio and tv hosts.

As such, we should not be taking the attitude of eating the rich, but rather one of truly educating them. HAVE those political discussions with people outside your normal economic circle. ENGAGE THEM in understanding their own beliefs and why they believe them. But above all, avoid finger pointing and blame, and instead, promote solutions with reasoned supporting data.

The only thing the UMC is really guilty of is allowing themselves to be duped - and failing to be students of policy and history. Give them their wake up call with a cup of home brewed coffee and banana bread, not the inquisition.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Amazing
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 20, 2008 7:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What I dont understand is that we have a complete and utter MORON sitting in the White House who refuses to even see that the people are having problems right here at home. But, we have BILLIONS of dollars to WASTE on worthless causes like Iraq. Go figure!

RD
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Amazing Posted by: KDelphi5950
» If only it were ONLY moronic Posted by: truthlover
» RE: Amazing Posted by: TheLimit
The Long Decline VI
Posted by: yellow on Aug 20, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The future of the US economy will involve more and more stagnation not only of GDP growth but of real income for the working and all levels of middle class. Over the past thirty five years since the end of the long post-WWII boom several trends have been evident, two of which stand out. One is that post recession recoveries have had delayed and only modest effects on net job growth creating chronically higher levels of unemployment. The other is the increased intensity of merger and acquisition activity which has concentrated the US economy to unprecedented levels shedding jobs and dramatically reducing real income in the process. The end result has been long term chronic stagnation due to significant loss of effective demand. These trends have also fed into the seven major financial crises experienced since the late 1980s.

The National Burea of Economic Research has tracked US business cycles since the 1920s. The NBER defined peaks and troughs of the cycles, based purely on GDP growth, are usually half as long as the peaks and troughs of the cycles if based on employment levels. For example, employment peaked in 1979 at only 5.8% unemployment hitting a trough in 1982 of over 10% unemployment. By the upturn in 1983, unemployment was only reduced back down to 7.5% despite the fact that GDP growth had returned to very high levels for the next seven years beginning in 1983. The same is true for the two jobless recoveries in the early 1990s and after 2001. Unemployment in both those cases remained significantly above pre-recession levels throughout the recovery. Economists at the Center for Economic Policy Research project that unemployment levels could remain at 6.7% to 8.4% by 2010 or 2011, the projected trough of the recession that began in the last quarter of 2007, after recovery. These economists expect chronic official unemployment levels to be well above 6% as a norm and possibly higher.

The reason is clear. The US economy has been concentrating at an incredible rate shedding jobs and concentrating income in the process. By the early 1970s, the start of the long downturn, only three major merger and acquisition movements had occured in US history. The first which began in 1896 and ended before WWI, coincided with job growth and the highest rate of net non-residential fixed investment in US history. The second wave occured after the 1921 recession and led to further consolidation.

The third began in the late 1960s as the conglomerate phase. Already the US economy was highly concentrated with the top 200 firms accounting for over 60% of all US manufacturing assets. Motivated by a desire to avoid anti-trust action and the need to spur corporate growth as the economy began to slow, corporate CEOs saw lateral acquisition of unrelated firms as a way to increase stock prices, raise needed capital and swell profits. An acquiring firm would approach the shareholders of a slow growth, low debt firm with a low P/E ratio (undervalued stock) and offer a price per share slightly higher than the going market value. The shareholders gladly sold out and the P/E ratio for the new entity would usually go up by an average of 33%. Thus, a bubble emerged until the recession of 1974 slowed this activity. There were even more intense merger waves in the 1980s and 1990s with more deals at higher average real purchasing value. The 1990s saw more than $2 trillion worth of merger activity. Since 2001, a further several trillion dollars in M&A deals have taken place possibly exceeding the value of all other M&A activity in US history!!

It is no wonder the US continues to endure chronic stagnation. Increased concentration, job loss, poverty and the loss of real income by the middle and working class has lowered effective demand. Late capitalism thus produces crisis after crisis by virtue of the logic of capital accumulation. Only a new system can change the course of history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Aug 20, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HAHAHAHA!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!

I laugh at the pain of the upper-middle class.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!! HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Aug 20, 2008 9:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!

HA!

HA!

HA!

I'm lovin' it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Upper middle class
Posted by: KDelphi5950 on Aug 20, 2008 10:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, now, the upper middle classes are getting it--do we at the bottom always have to wait for that? And, still, teh DNC Platofrm is noticeably vague on "poverty"--youguys DO knows its through the roof , now, dont you? IF you stil have a roof!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

You UMC do NOT get it!
Posted by: KDelphi5950 on Aug 20, 2008 10:27 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You just dont get it! Maybe its because my dad was poor and worked his way up--have you never really known any poor peole or what? You dont get it. I try over and over again to try ot explain and all you can offer me is bought-out Obama and essays about philsophers on AlterNet. Also, called racist. White trash. Stupid. Hey, if it hits you guys, too--who is ALSO stupid? Maybe if your beloved Obama wins, you ought to have a mandatory public service that includes really living liek the poeple you claim to want to help--with no cell phone to call home for money, lattes, Kobe beef or organic tofu and urugula. If you guys dont get it soon, the entire US is screwed, but i al;ready am. So are most people I know. And you dont care..But, you know what?? I STILL (on $560 a no,l WILL NOT SHOP at Wal-Mart! Nope!) When I hear Ted Koeppel and other rich telligensia saying they cant resist the $1 tube socks--I feel like throwing up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: You UMC do NOT get it! Posted by: Parcival01
» yum...arugula and organic tofu... Posted by: veggiegrrrl
» RE: You UMC do NOT get it! Posted by: stuarts
» and another thing. Posted by: stuarts
Gawd help us
Posted by: KDelphi5950 on Aug 20, 2008 10:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I read this over and over , looking for some recognition of how selfish and unaware you are! If you guys end u0 on the street--you are dead!Go pawn your diamond ring, babe! I cant afford IKEA---and my family is from Scandanavioa! Its no wonder GOP wins--you guys are just oblivious! People are dying in the street! Does that REGISTER with you anywhere?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Follow the money"
Posted by: Parcival01 on Aug 20, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is all too true. In my neighborhood,I'm surrounded by homes in default. Everyone is afraid...except for people in Greenwich, CT, for example, many of whom made into the billions...BILLIONS...last year.

Who needs more evidence of the gap between the rich and the rest of us getting wider by the day?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As far as I'm concerned the upper-middle class are wannabe nouveau riche snob assholes who deserve
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Aug 20, 2008 11:36 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
any misery that befalls them. Other than the ultra-rich business owners and politicians, they are the most loyal backers of the present consumer economy, whether they vote Democrat or not. To hell with them, their children, and their children's children.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh woe is the middle class.
Posted by: punkomonkeypants on Aug 20, 2008 11:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try being any of the following, mix and match if you so choose:
Poor and
1.a minority,
2.a single parent trying to work and pay childcare and bills,
3.a single parent who does all of the above and is trying to get an education at the same time,so they can eventually move out of the neighborhood where they can't let their children outside because they might disappear or get shot,
4.disabled,
5.unable to afford health care
......the list goes on.

The people above have been being "battered" financially for decades. The "new cool" has been a reality for millions of people that don't have the money to shop at Ikea,Target or even Wal-Mart or Dollar General of all places.

But it's only when the ones with their huge houses, big SUV's and designer label clothes start feeling the pinch does anyone care.

So sorry they have to shop at Ikea,god forbid if they eventually have to lower themselves to shop at a thrift store. Excuse me while I mourn for them and their financial problems.

Get real.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh woe is the middle class. Posted by: TheNamelessCity
» RE: Oh woe is the middle class. Posted by: punkomonkeypants
If your disposable income is $100,000 you're not upper middle class
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 20, 2008 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You're about middle-middle class. Disposable income,when I was a kid back in the 50's, meant you could lose X and not feel the pinch.
If X equals $100,000 that's a hell of a pinch!! That would make your 'take home salary' above $500,000 a year,without bonuses.
Now that's based on the old school idea of having 20% of your income saved as 'disposable'. I'm betting you need an income of a million dollars or more to have a hundred grand as disposable. If you're worth a million a year,you've reached the top 1% of middle class. Don't like hearing that? Blame Bush and Cheney. Blame their speculator friends and the financeirs of the big banks.
And if the upper middle class millionairs are having trouble,well times must be equally tough
on lower-upper class spendthrifts.
Since they really don't give a damn about how tought they make living on all the rest of us,why should we care if they have money troubles? Because we'll have to know how many extra plates to set at the soup kitchen.......
remember, the salad fork is third from the right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It always amazes me that
Posted by: bettyn on Aug 20, 2008 6:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
people in this class just mindlessly pull the lever for the GOP election after election. Their whole fear is that the Democrats will take their small nest egg and "give it all away to the N*&^ERS!" They repeat this mantra over and over again. They all loved Reagan when he talked about "welfare queens" and would follow him into HELL if asked.

These are supposedly educated people, but they sure don't get the fact they're getting ripped off by their CEOs, forced into early retirement, and eventually, end up as greeters at Wal-Mart when their 401k goes down the crapper or their health goes bad and they're forced to live on their Social Security check.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Boo Friggin' Hoo...
Posted by: Lily H. on Aug 20, 2008 11:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the UMC will now be forced to shop at IKEA and
thrift shops? Get in line, honey, I was here first,
and you'd best wait your turn in the local food bank
line, too.
Maybe they'll also need to alley-shop for various niceties as I've done for many years now. Just this
past week, I found a nice set of brand new auto seat
covers still in their original bag, right out in the
open. I shop the markdown bins in my local grocery
stores, also. I find many name-brand items, still in
great shape, all kinds of products from dog food to
medicines, you name it, they'll have it.
My neighborhood thrift shops have experienced a
run on their merchandise, namely from folks now hit
by higher gas prices, trying to save a few bucks.
What an insult to consider thrifty shopping and
living, "the new cool". When you have NO OTHER CHOICES
but to live frugally, it no longer is a novelty, like
"slumming". I frankly don't care what calamity the so-
called UMC suffer, as the phrase goes, "Let them eat
stale day-old leavings from the bread line".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Wealth Disparity Pump Is The Problem
Posted by: wspademan on Aug 21, 2008 7:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need a new economic system. Check out this new kind of nonprofit bank, designed to create a more just economic system, in a short time: commongoodbank.com

Our current economic system rewards wealth much more than it rewards productive contributions to society. As a result, wealth is pumped faster and faster from the poor to the already rich. The process is exponential (see a graph of the current situation at What's The Problem With Unearned Income).

In a few years, under the current system, the upper middle class, having effortlessly and inadvertently pumped nearly all the wealth out of the lower classes, may itself be pumped dry by the upper (and upper upper) class. The system benefits fewer and fewer people. We need a new economic system that distributes wealth sensibly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another point of view
Posted by: Sissy on Aug 21, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have read just about everyone of the posts on this thread and as always I find the different opinions on a surly subject riveting to say the least.

One point that I haven't seen or perhaps "missed" was why there is so much angst among those of us in the quickly dimishing middle class against the "haves" in this country.

If the UMC and the super class would only pay their fair share of the burden of running a country, we wouldn't be looking at you with such a jaundiced eye. The mantra "lighten the tax burden" is continually drilled at no abatement. No one likes to pay taxes, we would all like to keep our money as our own, but when the burden is shifted so blatantly unfairly, you can only find down the way class wars. Tax breaks that allow for corporations to move off shore, hire workers in other countries, enormous gifts given to the mega rich oil producers and only their sharholders reap the benefits, not investing in alternative ways to harness energy. All of these make for great frustration and yes, a lot of anger. When you know that you pay a higher percentage of taxes than Exxon and Mobile, when you read of the huge tax benefits a class of people receive, it makes you more than angry.

For those of you who have great jobs, have done everything right by not buying mega mansions or maxing out your credit cards to pay for medical, mortgage and car payments. Good for you. Honestly, I tip my hat off to you, but beware it can be wonderful if you aren't in debt because as hard as it may be to believe, you could lose that very fine paying job tomorrow because unfortunately, in today's cut throat world you have no job security. I have been running a food pantry in this community for 25 years and it isn't just the welfare mother, the senior citizen, or the menial jobless that we see. We've helped people, who believe it or not had 6 figure jobs, a nice boat and ATV in the driveway while summering in the Bahamas who have come to us because one day their job was gone, the company gone and he chance of their getting a like-job all but nil.

For myself I would only ask that you pay your fair share. That the tax burden isn't passed on to me so that roads can be fixed, that bridges may be built that schools can do their all important job.

That's all I ask, is it too much?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another point of view Posted by: Sissy
» RE: Another point of view Posted by: Sissy
» RE: Another point of view Posted by: Sissy
» RE: Another point of view Posted by: TheLimit
» RE: Another point of view Posted by: Sissy
» RE: Another point of view Posted by: Sissy
» RE: Another point of view Posted by: CommonDreamer
Malcolm X
Posted by: makeadifference on Aug 21, 2008 11:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Malcolm X predicted the next civil war or revolution wouldn't be over race, but over class. I think he was right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]