COMMENTS: 105
Stop the Execution: Jeff Wood Faces Death Tomorrow for a Murder He Didn't Commit
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
This is what Paige Lynn Wood went through all day yesterday, which also happened to be her father's 35th birthday. In the end, her worst fears were realized: On Tuesday afternoon, the board decided, in a vote of 7-0, to execute her father, Jeff Wood. Wood is scheduled to die by lethal injection Thursday night for a murder he did not commit. It's not just that he has a strong innocence claim, or that his state-appointed council was completely incompetent during his capital trial. The fact is, Wood did not kill anyone -- and no one argues that he did. The person who committed the murder for which he is scheduled to die was already executed, six years ago.
The Crime, an Overzealous Prosecutor and a Man Named "Dr. Death"
On New Years Day 1996, 22-year-old Jeff Wood was in on a plot to rob a Texaco convenience store in Kerrville, Texas, along with a man named Daniel Reneau. The store's assistant manager was an accomplice in the robbery: He was going to help Reneau navigate the store. But things didn't go according to plan, and in the early hours of Jan. 2, Reneau shot their friend Kriss Keeran, who was working behind the counter, in the face, killing him instantly.
Wood was startled when he heard the gunshot, but he reportedly helped carry out the subsequent robbery anyway, stealing several thousand dollars. He and Reneau were arrested within 24 hours. They confessed to the crime, and Wood led police to the murder weapon.
While it remains unclear to what extent Wood was supposed to participate in the robbery, what is absolutely undisputed is that Wood had no role in Keeran's murder. According to his attorneys, he was not even aware that Reneau was carrying a gun. After all, the robbery was supposed to be an inside job. As reiterated in the clemency brief filed by Wood’s defense attorneys early this month, "Reneau -- the only person inside the store and who carried a weapon -- alone made the decision to take Keeran's life. Mr. Wood was outside the store in his brother's truck."
Months later, during the trial of Daniel Reneau, there was no ambiguity over who had killed Keeran. According to Jordan Smith of the Austin Chronicle, "the state argued that he was responsible for Keeran's murder and portrayed Wood as little more than a sap, steamrolled by the villainous Reneau."
Renaeu was sentenced to death in March 1997. He was executed in 2002. Following the execution, the Dallas Morning News reported that when "asked on death row last week to identify the shooter, Reneau had a one-word reply: 'Me.'"
Having locked in a death sentence for Reneau, it should have defied logic and legal ethics for prosecutors to change the story to make Wood the real villain. But that's what happened. "At Wood's trial," reports Smith, "prosecutors reversed their strategy, arguing that Wood deserved to die because he'd gotten Reneau to 'do his dirty work.'"
Wood's defense lawyers were useless. "Bowing to Mr. Wood's emotional and irrational insistence, Mr. Wood's appointed lawyers declined to cross-examine any witnesses or present any evidence on Mr. Wood's behalf," his appeals attorneys argue. "Mr. Wood's trial attorneys called Mr. Wood's actions a 'gesture of suicide.'" If anything, it was an assisted suicide. Reports Smith, "not only did (Wood's defense) withhold from the jury evidence of his troubled youth, but they also failed to cross-examine any state witnesses, including the wildly speculative testimony of Dr. James Grigson -- derisively known by many, including colleagues in the psychiatric community, as 'Dr. Death' for predictably offering testimony in capital cases that a defendant would pose a danger to society, one of the questions a jury must decide in order to impose a death sentence." (In 1995, Grigson was kicked out of the American Psychiatric Association and Texas Society of Psychiatric Physicians for "flagrant ethical violations.")
Thus, one year after Renaeu was given a death sentence for killing Keeran, Wood, despite not having been present to witness the murder, was given a death sentence for the same crime.
The Case of Kenneth Foster Jr.
The case of Jeff Wood may sound beyond the pale, even for the state that carries out more executions than any other jurisdiction in the country, but it is by no means the first time the state of Texas has tried to kill two people for a murder committed by one person. In fact, at this same time last year, Kenneth Foster Jr. faced execution in a case with striking similarities to Jeff Wood's. Foster was convicted and sentenced to death for the 1996 murder of Michael LaHood Jr., despite the fact that the actual murder had been committed by another man.
Foster was 19 years old and acting as the "getaway driver" in a series of robberies when one of the people in the car, a man named Mauriceo Brown, shot and killed LaHood, the son of a prominent attorney, at the end of the night. Foster was 80 feet away -- like Wood, waiting in the car -- when Brown pulled the trigger. He had the windows rolled up and was unaware that a murder was taking place. Mauriceo Brown admitted to the murder; he was executed in 2006.
Last year, Foster's life was saved by a grassroots movement to stop his execution. At the center of the public outcry was the injustice of a legal statute, one that, in its application, is uniquely Texan.
An Unjust Law
Foster and Wood were both sentenced under Texas's "law of parties," which is a twist on a conspiracy statute that allows a defendant to be held accountable for a crime even if he or she did not commit it. As I explained in writing about the Foster case last summer, in the state of Texas, "this can mean sentencing someone to death even if he or she had no proven role in a murder."
Texas's law states that "if, in the attempt to carry out a conspiracy to commit one felony, another felony is committed by one of the conspirators, all conspirators are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it." Defendants, the Texas courts say, can be held responsible for "failing to anticipate" that the "conspiracy -- in Foster's case, the robberies, for which he was the getaway driver -- would lead to a murder.In Wood's case, the murder was also unplanned. Thus, he too is to be executed for "failing to anticipate" that someone would be killed.
Family Victims
As he faced execution, Foster shared something else in common with Wood: He had a young daughter who was a courageous voice of protest on behalf of her father. At a July 2007 rally, 11-year-old Nydesha Foster read from an essay about her father. "They hate on my dad because they say, 'he should have known better.' Are they following the law to the letter? Or the letter to the law?" She continued:
I stand as a child in the light of redemption. I benefit from his kisses and what he does even when people don't look or listen. So what is justice? Shame on you, Texas, because this time you're really wrong. This is my poem, my prayer, my song. That you will be known for something other than killing and ignoring the truth. We all make mistakes. Even you.You can watch it here.
Like Nydesha, Paige Lynn Wood has stood in public to defend the life of her father. Pictures of her and other family members at rallies, making signs and approaching the governor's mansion can be found on the Save Jeff Wood Web site. So can her poetry.
One of her poems is called "Waiting."
I sit and wait … And wonder/I have been waiting my whole life
All the time wondering … Is my daddy coming home?One is titled "Texas Took My Dad."
My dad is not the killer/That you are led to believe he is.
He is a kind and gentle soul who only tried to do/What he believed was best for me
... And for those of you/Who want to kill my dad …
For shame, for shame/It's you who are now to blame/for taking away my life!Tell Gov. Rick Perry Not to Execute Jeff Wood
Jeff Wood's supporters are urging the governor of Texas to grant a 30-day stay of execution. Call or fax the governor today:
Phone: (512) 463-2000
Fax: (512) 463-1849
****UPDATE: On Thursday, August 21, a federal appeals court granted a last-minute stay of execution, on the grounds that Wood is not mentally competent for execution. Thanks to all of you who helped get the word out!****
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cordas on Aug 20, 2008 2:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: That is messed up,
Posted by: Libsrule
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 20, 2008 2:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We paid the taxes
Posted by: PaulK
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: john mont
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: Libsrule
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: BigElectricCat
» "time line loophole"
Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» RE: "time line loophole"
Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: "time line loophole"
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: TagsNOLA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Aug 20, 2008 2:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These lunatics are unpatriotic, and un-American. They violate the principle of justice declared by Thomas Jefferson himself who once said, "It is better that one hundred guilty men should go free than that one innocent man should needlessly suffer." With these idiots, the principle is, "It is better that one hundred innocent men should be needlessly punished than that one guilty man should go free."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Exactly!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: State murder is very American
Posted by: fearn
» RE: State murder is very American
Posted by: Xynyx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: topbrick on Aug 20, 2008 2:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: celeborn
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: Karina
» Reminds me of a story of Nazi times
Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Will someone explain this?
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: Karina
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: annekarina
» The problem is, the south is not culturally part of the US
Posted by: Leadlip
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wellaware lec on Aug 20, 2008 3:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wonder if this is held to across the board, regardless of who murders someone within any conspiracy to kill...and was this in effect when JFK was murdered in Texas, for instance (no way there was a lone gunman), and what about all the other accomplices to murder in that state?
Secondly, if our very own Texas administration criminals were held to this, there'd be a whole pack of people on death row right now, except for the ones already executed... Hmmmm. If it's good enough for Texas, why not look at the Texas politicians... in the same way...?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WHY NOT ACROSS THE BOARD, THEN????
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: WHY NOT ACROSS THE BOARD, THEN????
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: WHY NOT ACROSS THE BOARD, THEN????
Posted by: Jayzer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: farmer's daughter on Aug 20, 2008 5:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» FLDS scandal WAS ABOUT REMOVING ROMNEY FROM GOP TICKET
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» RE: Taking care of business,er...children
Posted by: AuntBec
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on Aug 20, 2008 6:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NthnBrazil on Aug 20, 2008 6:44 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One other thing to note:
Often times people criticize the Felony Murder Rule using the example of someone lending his roommate a car and then being tried if that car is used in a crime that results in murder, but this is a straw-man. The purpose of the Felony Murder Rule is precisely for the Woods case: when an accomplice to a crime that results in murder does not come forward they can be tried as an accomplice to that murder. Whether or not you favor the death penalty, the Felony Murder Rule is a separate issue for debate. Challenging the Felony Murder Rule as a reason not to execute is a divergent argument.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Key difference between the Foster & Woods cases
Posted by: rinthy
» RE: Key difference between the Foster & Woods cases
Posted by: TagsNOLA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WolfieSense on Aug 20, 2008 7:28 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: we can't let the vicious bastards rule!
Posted by: rinthy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lizard010 on Aug 20, 2008 7:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No. This is the country where law abiding citizens can own firearms to protect themselves from scum
Posted by: European American
» RE: No. This is the country where law abiding citizens can own firearms to protect themselves from scum
Posted by: BreeMass
» Well, I don’t rob people
Posted by: European American
» RE: Well, I don’t rob people
Posted by: Gisele
» RE: No. This is the country where law abiding citizens can own firearms to protect themselves from scum
Posted by: lizard010
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 20, 2008 7:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RD
Is your ISP watching?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: allisartisall on Aug 20, 2008 8:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ALLISARTISALL
Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com
» No
Posted by: European American
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rugger on Aug 20, 2008 9:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would Jesus do?
Let's start a movement to get the south to secede again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: djnoll on Aug 20, 2008 9:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is unthinkable in our society that innocents are put to death in Texas? Why? George W. Bush was as bad as their current governor in inflicting the death penalty, and look where it got him. I have lived in Texas once for a very short time, thankfully, and while some people I met were nice,for the most part those I met were cold, ruthless, corrupt, and as close to inhuman in their connections to others as any I have met or seen in 56 years of living, and trust me that is saying something! They will tolerate the killing of innocent co-conspirators because to them they are not real humans.
In most states there are several elements of a crime: opportunity, means, motive, and finally, intent. The intent falls under the understanding of mens rea - reasonable mind - and without intent there is no crime. It requires that the person involved intended to commit the crime, planned the crime, and then intentionally carried out that crime. This Texas law takes this understanding one step further and demands that criminals be able to read the minds of their co-conspirators in order to act to prevent them from acting. What a load of BS! But, of course, we are talking Texas where they consider this reasoned thought.
As I look back on history, I find myself wondering what Sam Houston would think about this state today? This was a man who believed in the rule of law, yes, but he also fought against injustice and for freedom. Would he have approved such a law on its face? Maybe. Would he sign such a death warrant? Maybe, but I would like to think that this man who fought for freedom and justice his whole life would never endorsed state murder when the legal basis is so seriously flawed and the law so egregiously abused.
TEXAS and TEXANS, you should be ashamed of yourselves and your state's government! But, because you think Bush is so wonderful, it is no wonder you support this state sanctioned murder.
By the way, I am not opposed to the death penalty for those who actually take a life, only those who are put to death for being there or as party to something that was never suppose to include a murder.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Many states have a similar law...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Many states have a similar law...
Posted by: djnoll
» RE: Many states have a similar law...
Posted by: EncinoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 20, 2008 10:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"CHAPTER 7. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCT OF ANOTHER"
Insanity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Perhaps Mr. Woods should incorporate
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
» Originally intended to be an anti-gang law
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Originally intended to be an anti-gang law
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Originally intended to be an anti-gang law
Posted by: fanny666
Comments are closed-
Posted by: debmcd on Aug 20, 2008 1:33 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bruceslog on Aug 20, 2008 1:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the 7 people that sit on that bench, and the prosecutor, and the governor, and the Judge, have just committed a murder of their own, I wonder if any of them go to church ? I wonder if how they sleep at night, knowing that they have just condemned their own souls to an eternity in
Hell ?
And I wonder who will be surprised when a 14 year old child by the name of Paige Lynn Wood grows into a woman who becomes anti-social and rebels against her own countries government, because she knows that her government murdered her father ?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Those 7 will rot
Posted by: Nigelthebriton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wildswan on Aug 20, 2008 1:51 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lawstudent08 on Aug 20, 2008 1:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jaidae on Aug 20, 2008 2:04 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of just executing killers, we want to execute any who participated in a series of crimes that may have led to an unexpected killing, because they should have known the secret intentions of their accomplices.
Maybe we should also execute the parents of those who knew others, who might someday commit murders, because they, too should have known what might happen - and failed to report it.
Then there are the children of those who were associated with murder - or knew someone who might commit unpremeditated murder in the future... maybe we should round all of them up too. Why? Because, somewhere deep in their DNA, they too should know what their friends, parents (or government?) may someday do.
How much vengeance do we Americans need? There seems to be no end to it. And we might ask, qui bono? - Who benefits from this violence?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Aug 20, 2008 2:10 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'd think Harper never noticed the perpetual egregious violations against Human Rights, Civil Law & ETHICS which perpetually stuns the REST OF THE WORLD who observes American government institutions in action.
*shudder*...
I mean, Bernie Siegelman should be at least a TIP for Harper... who is hoping to forestall his OWN government's investigations into ELECTION FINANCE FRAUD... by ... drum roll please!... declaring an election before the Parliamentary Ethics Committee can uncover all the dirt.
This from a Prime Minister who ONLY GOT HIS POSITION BECAUSE HE INSTIGATED A VOTE OF NO-CONFIDENCE BASED ON AN INCOMPLETE COMMISSION INVESTIGATING a mere $200K suggestion of adscam malfeasance...
pitiful.
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
" ... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Jihadi Junior deserves everything he is getting.
Posted by: European American
» RE: I love how Canadian PM Harper
Posted by: emmas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: esteph on Aug 20, 2008 2:16 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us hope that Jeff Woods family do not have to witness his murder by the state government and then fight for his innocence.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: steph
Posted by: deschain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thekidde on Aug 20, 2008 2:19 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Petraeus, Rice, Feith, Wolfowitz, Rove, etc.
Posted by: AuntBec
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 20, 2008 2:28 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Experts say that being spanked leads to violence and even more acting out by those who are so punished.
Coincidence?
I just phoned Gov Perry's office and told him to not only help save Jeff Wood, but also to help end the unChristian and EVIL "Law of Parties" in Texas.
(I hope it is not too late for Wood.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billwald on Aug 20, 2008 2:48 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Traven on Aug 20, 2008 3:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And so we are sure, let’s restate the text of the pivotal paragraph from the great legal minds of Texas:
"if, in the attempt to carry out a conspiracy to commit one felony, another felony is committed by one of the conspirators, all conspirators are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it."
So let us cast stones and apply this logic to recent political events of the last decade.
Since at least four different authors have written books claiming the Bush Administration knew there were no WMD in Iraq and lied the United States into the war and said administration cherry picked weak intelligence and then made up lies to flesh out the finishing touches on this grand lie…Surely this qualifies as a high crime…
I would direct anyone interested in the legal aspects of this very real crime to Vincent Bugliosi and his recent writings on the subject and his new book named: The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
Bugliosi says it better than I can:
"The overriding assumption here has to be that if; in fact, Bush lied to the nation in taking it to war, and we all should want to find some lawful way to bring him to justice, “Bugliosi writes,” That has to be the predisposition among all good men. It cannot be otherwise. I don't like to see anyone get away with murder, even one. And here we're talking about the needless killing and slaughter of over 100,000 human beings for which this man may be criminally responsible."
But somehow only putting Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld on trial does not do justice to this wide ranging conspiracy of murder and death.
What about all those co-conspirators? What about all those hack journalists who went along and the board members of big media companies that decided there should be 3 conservatives - pushing the war on air- for every 1 anti-war voice – going so far in one case to take an anti-war voice off the air to curry favor with the pro-war and self serving beltway culture of overpaid quacks, lairs and indifferent policy whores.
What about those national syndicated journalists who pushed every lie knowing full well they would be rewarded for their shallow loyalty to the big lie.
What about all those companies that have earned great profits from this illegal war.
What about all those representatives in both houses that approved and voted for this aggressive war to control oil resources. (See Nuremberg Trial for definition of war waged to control and steal resources not owned by the aggressor.)
The list is very long indeed.
By the Texas definition there are a great deal of people should be standing on trap doors with hoods over their heads as history HAS show us.
As this case demonstrates this poor little man, who happened to be driving the get-away car when someone else committed murder brings into stark relief a point which should not be lost on any sane American.
If he, this get-away driver deserves to die for his poor foresight of potential future events then justice would be served if the American people decided to hang a few thousand politicians, journalists and corporate bosses who using what ever lame and silly excuse they might come up with...
All we have to do is state the Texas law back in their little craven faces and procede with many hundreds of trials...as:
"...all conspirators (AND), are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it....."
That would be real justice.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: for the sake of our nation's soul
Posted by: EncinoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DetachedObserver on Aug 20, 2008 4:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's Texas, what else would you expect?
Posted by: StirMan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 20, 2008 4:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to voice his/her concern that this execution is making him/her an accomplice to an illegal act!
Why can't people understand murder in any instance is not tolerated... PERIOD!
The legal system in Texas is absurd... beyond bizarre...
but social justice in the entire US is nothing more then JUST US and has no basis in real social order and good governance, and is rather rude and socially irresponsible almost to the point of being criminal!
nuff said
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TheLimit on Aug 20, 2008 10:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, this guy was involved in the crime, and as someone posted above, if you are involved in a crime where someone gets killed, whether or not you pulled the trigger or had any intention of hurting someone, you are liable. Period. And that is not only true of Texas; it's been true everywhere I've lived in this country.
The worst thing about being in prison in Texas though is that you can be proven totally innocent of the crime you were incarcerated for, but still put to death, as has happened there more than once since DNA evidence has been available.
Best thing is just to avoid Texas totally.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AnnaS on Aug 21, 2008 1:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Aug 21, 2008 9:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1789
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Aug 21, 2008 12:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1789
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pajohnso on Aug 21, 2008 1:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is the link to the website, a Federal Judge issued a stay of execution, but he has not been granted clemency as of yet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Aug 21, 2008 1:29 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you revel in supporting the murder of a precious innocent baby in the 3rd trimester inches and seconds from birth.
As an objective, rational, and independent thinking individual -- I have never been able to understand how you guys internally rationalize this grand and disgusting hypocrisy.
Denial is probably the answer.
I noticed the release today of a comprehensive, non-partisan, scientific study concluded that tower 7 fell on 9/11 as the result of fatigue from unchecked fires, not the conspiracy theory posited by many of you guys.
Probably, you guys will resort to denial for this as well.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: AuntBec
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: AuntBec
» How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war that forced the removal of a dictator who:
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war that forced the removal of a dictator wh
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war that forced the removal of a dictator wh
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war (MY Response: Part II)
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: mercianomad
» I'm not lefty but can answer your twisted question easy enough...
Posted by: Bearzerker
» RE: I'm not lefty but can answer your twisted question easy enough...
Posted by: EagleX
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Aug 21, 2008 5:30 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: cordas on Aug 20, 2008 2:30 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: That is messed up,
Posted by: Libsrule
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 20, 2008 2:33 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» We paid the taxes
Posted by: PaulK
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: john mont
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: Libsrule
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: BigElectricCat
» "time line loophole"
Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» RE: "time line loophole"
Posted by: BigElectricCat
» RE: "time line loophole"
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Felony murder rule
Posted by: TagsNOLA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Fang-Face Dreamweaver on Aug 20, 2008 2:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These lunatics are unpatriotic, and un-American. They violate the principle of justice declared by Thomas Jefferson himself who once said, "It is better that one hundred guilty men should go free than that one innocent man should needlessly suffer." With these idiots, the principle is, "It is better that one hundred innocent men should be needlessly punished than that one guilty man should go free."
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Exactly!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: State murder is very American
Posted by: fearn
» RE: State murder is very American
Posted by: Xynyx
Comments are closed-
Posted by: topbrick on Aug 20, 2008 2:45 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: celeborn
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: Karina
» Reminds me of a story of Nazi times
Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Will someone explain this?
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: Karina
» RE: Very sad
Posted by: annekarina
» The problem is, the south is not culturally part of the US
Posted by: Leadlip
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wellaware lec on Aug 20, 2008 3:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wonder if this is held to across the board, regardless of who murders someone within any conspiracy to kill...and was this in effect when JFK was murdered in Texas, for instance (no way there was a lone gunman), and what about all the other accomplices to murder in that state?
Secondly, if our very own Texas administration criminals were held to this, there'd be a whole pack of people on death row right now, except for the ones already executed... Hmmmm. If it's good enough for Texas, why not look at the Texas politicians... in the same way...?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: WHY NOT ACROSS THE BOARD, THEN????
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: WHY NOT ACROSS THE BOARD, THEN????
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: WHY NOT ACROSS THE BOARD, THEN????
Posted by: Jayzer
Comments are closed-
Posted by: farmer's daughter on Aug 20, 2008 5:57 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» FLDS scandal WAS ABOUT REMOVING ROMNEY FROM GOP TICKET
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
» RE: Taking care of business,er...children
Posted by: AuntBec
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kungfoofighterx on Aug 20, 2008 6:37 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: NthnBrazil on Aug 20, 2008 6:44 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One other thing to note:
Often times people criticize the Felony Murder Rule using the example of someone lending his roommate a car and then being tried if that car is used in a crime that results in murder, but this is a straw-man. The purpose of the Felony Murder Rule is precisely for the Woods case: when an accomplice to a crime that results in murder does not come forward they can be tried as an accomplice to that murder. Whether or not you favor the death penalty, the Felony Murder Rule is a separate issue for debate. Challenging the Felony Murder Rule as a reason not to execute is a divergent argument.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Key difference between the Foster & Woods cases
Posted by: rinthy
» RE: Key difference between the Foster & Woods cases
Posted by: TagsNOLA
Comments are closed-
Posted by: WolfieSense on Aug 20, 2008 7:28 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: we can't let the vicious bastards rule!
Posted by: rinthy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lizard010 on Aug 20, 2008 7:35 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» No. This is the country where law abiding citizens can own firearms to protect themselves from scum
Posted by: European American
» RE: No. This is the country where law abiding citizens can own firearms to protect themselves from scum
Posted by: BreeMass
» Well, I don’t rob people
Posted by: European American
» RE: Well, I don’t rob people
Posted by: Gisele
» RE: No. This is the country where law abiding citizens can own firearms to protect themselves from scum
Posted by: lizard010
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 20, 2008 7:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RD
Is your ISP watching?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: allisartisall on Aug 20, 2008 8:42 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ALLISARTISALL
Posted by: wagnerrocks@gmail.com
» No
Posted by: European American
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rugger on Aug 20, 2008 9:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What would Jesus do?
Let's start a movement to get the south to secede again.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: djnoll on Aug 20, 2008 9:41 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is unthinkable in our society that innocents are put to death in Texas? Why? George W. Bush was as bad as their current governor in inflicting the death penalty, and look where it got him. I have lived in Texas once for a very short time, thankfully, and while some people I met were nice,for the most part those I met were cold, ruthless, corrupt, and as close to inhuman in their connections to others as any I have met or seen in 56 years of living, and trust me that is saying something! They will tolerate the killing of innocent co-conspirators because to them they are not real humans.
In most states there are several elements of a crime: opportunity, means, motive, and finally, intent. The intent falls under the understanding of mens rea - reasonable mind - and without intent there is no crime. It requires that the person involved intended to commit the crime, planned the crime, and then intentionally carried out that crime. This Texas law takes this understanding one step further and demands that criminals be able to read the minds of their co-conspirators in order to act to prevent them from acting. What a load of BS! But, of course, we are talking Texas where they consider this reasoned thought.
As I look back on history, I find myself wondering what Sam Houston would think about this state today? This was a man who believed in the rule of law, yes, but he also fought against injustice and for freedom. Would he have approved such a law on its face? Maybe. Would he sign such a death warrant? Maybe, but I would like to think that this man who fought for freedom and justice his whole life would never endorsed state murder when the legal basis is so seriously flawed and the law so egregiously abused.
TEXAS and TEXANS, you should be ashamed of yourselves and your state's government! But, because you think Bush is so wonderful, it is no wonder you support this state sanctioned murder.
By the way, I am not opposed to the death penalty for those who actually take a life, only those who are put to death for being there or as party to something that was never suppose to include a murder.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Many states have a similar law...
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Many states have a similar law...
Posted by: djnoll
» RE: Many states have a similar law...
Posted by: EncinoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 20, 2008 10:06 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"CHAPTER 7. CRIMINAL RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONDUCT OF ANOTHER"
Insanity.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Perhaps Mr. Woods should incorporate
Posted by: Ignatz deFyre
» Originally intended to be an anti-gang law
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Originally intended to be an anti-gang law
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Originally intended to be an anti-gang law
Posted by: fanny666
Comments are closed-
Posted by: debmcd on Aug 20, 2008 1:33 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bruceslog on Aug 20, 2008 1:50 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So the 7 people that sit on that bench, and the prosecutor, and the governor, and the Judge, have just committed a murder of their own, I wonder if any of them go to church ? I wonder if how they sleep at night, knowing that they have just condemned their own souls to an eternity in
Hell ?
And I wonder who will be surprised when a 14 year old child by the name of Paige Lynn Wood grows into a woman who becomes anti-social and rebels against her own countries government, because she knows that her government murdered her father ?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Those 7 will rot
Posted by: Nigelthebriton
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wildswan on Aug 20, 2008 1:51 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: lawstudent08 on Aug 20, 2008 1:57 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jaidae on Aug 20, 2008 2:04 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Instead of just executing killers, we want to execute any who participated in a series of crimes that may have led to an unexpected killing, because they should have known the secret intentions of their accomplices.
Maybe we should also execute the parents of those who knew others, who might someday commit murders, because they, too should have known what might happen - and failed to report it.
Then there are the children of those who were associated with murder - or knew someone who might commit unpremeditated murder in the future... maybe we should round all of them up too. Why? Because, somewhere deep in their DNA, they too should know what their friends, parents (or government?) may someday do.
How much vengeance do we Americans need? There seems to be no end to it. And we might ask, qui bono? - Who benefits from this violence?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Aug 20, 2008 2:10 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'd think Harper never noticed the perpetual egregious violations against Human Rights, Civil Law & ETHICS which perpetually stuns the REST OF THE WORLD who observes American government institutions in action.
*shudder*...
I mean, Bernie Siegelman should be at least a TIP for Harper... who is hoping to forestall his OWN government's investigations into ELECTION FINANCE FRAUD... by ... drum roll please!... declaring an election before the Parliamentary Ethics Committee can uncover all the dirt.
This from a Prime Minister who ONLY GOT HIS POSITION BECAUSE HE INSTIGATED A VOTE OF NO-CONFIDENCE BASED ON AN INCOMPLETE COMMISSION INVESTIGATING a mere $200K suggestion of adscam malfeasance...
pitiful.
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
" ... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice..." ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Jihadi Junior deserves everything he is getting.
Posted by: European American
» RE: I love how Canadian PM Harper
Posted by: emmas
Comments are closed-
Posted by: esteph on Aug 20, 2008 2:16 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us hope that Jeff Woods family do not have to witness his murder by the state government and then fight for his innocence.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: steph
Posted by: deschain
Comments are closed-
Posted by: thekidde on Aug 20, 2008 2:19 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Petraeus, Rice, Feith, Wolfowitz, Rove, etc.
Posted by: AuntBec
Comments are closed-
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 20, 2008 2:28 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Experts say that being spanked leads to violence and even more acting out by those who are so punished.
Coincidence?
I just phoned Gov Perry's office and told him to not only help save Jeff Wood, but also to help end the unChristian and EVIL "Law of Parties" in Texas.
(I hope it is not too late for Wood.)
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billwald on Aug 20, 2008 2:48 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Traven on Aug 20, 2008 3:16 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And so we are sure, let’s restate the text of the pivotal paragraph from the great legal minds of Texas:
"if, in the attempt to carry out a conspiracy to commit one felony, another felony is committed by one of the conspirators, all conspirators are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it."
So let us cast stones and apply this logic to recent political events of the last decade.
Since at least four different authors have written books claiming the Bush Administration knew there were no WMD in Iraq and lied the United States into the war and said administration cherry picked weak intelligence and then made up lies to flesh out the finishing touches on this grand lie…Surely this qualifies as a high crime…
I would direct anyone interested in the legal aspects of this very real crime to Vincent Bugliosi and his recent writings on the subject and his new book named: The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder
Bugliosi says it better than I can:
"The overriding assumption here has to be that if; in fact, Bush lied to the nation in taking it to war, and we all should want to find some lawful way to bring him to justice, “Bugliosi writes,” That has to be the predisposition among all good men. It cannot be otherwise. I don't like to see anyone get away with murder, even one. And here we're talking about the needless killing and slaughter of over 100,000 human beings for which this man may be criminally responsible."
But somehow only putting Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld on trial does not do justice to this wide ranging conspiracy of murder and death.
What about all those co-conspirators? What about all those hack journalists who went along and the board members of big media companies that decided there should be 3 conservatives - pushing the war on air- for every 1 anti-war voice – going so far in one case to take an anti-war voice off the air to curry favor with the pro-war and self serving beltway culture of overpaid quacks, lairs and indifferent policy whores.
What about those national syndicated journalists who pushed every lie knowing full well they would be rewarded for their shallow loyalty to the big lie.
What about all those companies that have earned great profits from this illegal war.
What about all those representatives in both houses that approved and voted for this aggressive war to control oil resources. (See Nuremberg Trial for definition of war waged to control and steal resources not owned by the aggressor.)
The list is very long indeed.
By the Texas definition there are a great deal of people should be standing on trap doors with hoods over their heads as history HAS show us.
As this case demonstrates this poor little man, who happened to be driving the get-away car when someone else committed murder brings into stark relief a point which should not be lost on any sane American.
If he, this get-away driver deserves to die for his poor foresight of potential future events then justice would be served if the American people decided to hang a few thousand politicians, journalists and corporate bosses who using what ever lame and silly excuse they might come up with...
All we have to do is state the Texas law back in their little craven faces and procede with many hundreds of trials...as:
"...all conspirators (AND), are guilty of the felony actually committed, though having no intent to commit it....."
That would be real justice.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: for the sake of our nation's soul
Posted by: EncinoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: DetachedObserver on Aug 20, 2008 4:27 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: It's Texas, what else would you expect?
Posted by: StirMan
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Aug 20, 2008 4:39 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to voice his/her concern that this execution is making him/her an accomplice to an illegal act!
Why can't people understand murder in any instance is not tolerated... PERIOD!
The legal system in Texas is absurd... beyond bizarre...
but social justice in the entire US is nothing more then JUST US and has no basis in real social order and good governance, and is rather rude and socially irresponsible almost to the point of being criminal!
nuff said
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: TheLimit on Aug 20, 2008 10:17 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, this guy was involved in the crime, and as someone posted above, if you are involved in a crime where someone gets killed, whether or not you pulled the trigger or had any intention of hurting someone, you are liable. Period. And that is not only true of Texas; it's been true everywhere I've lived in this country.
The worst thing about being in prison in Texas though is that you can be proven totally innocent of the crime you were incarcerated for, but still put to death, as has happened there more than once since DNA evidence has been available.
Best thing is just to avoid Texas totally.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: AnnaS on Aug 21, 2008 1:08 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Aug 21, 2008 9:44 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1789
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Romantic Violence on Aug 21, 2008 12:00 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1789
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: pajohnso on Aug 21, 2008 1:26 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here is the link to the website, a Federal Judge issued a stay of execution, but he has not been granted clemency as of yet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Aug 21, 2008 1:29 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
you revel in supporting the murder of a precious innocent baby in the 3rd trimester inches and seconds from birth.
As an objective, rational, and independent thinking individual -- I have never been able to understand how you guys internally rationalize this grand and disgusting hypocrisy.
Denial is probably the answer.
I noticed the release today of a comprehensive, non-partisan, scientific study concluded that tower 7 fell on 9/11 as the result of fatigue from unchecked fires, not the conspiracy theory posited by many of you guys.
Probably, you guys will resort to denial for this as well.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: AuntBec
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: AuntBec
» How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war that forced the removal of a dictator who:
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war that forced the removal of a dictator wh
Posted by: YogiBear
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war that forced the removal of a dictator wh
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war ... (MY Response Part I)
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: How does the Left rationalize their opposition to a war (MY Response: Part II)
Posted by: Jayzer
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: mercianomad
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: EagleX
» RE: Question for the "humane" Left .....
Posted by: mercianomad
» I'm not lefty but can answer your twisted question easy enough...
Posted by: Bearzerker
» RE: I'm not lefty but can answer your twisted question easy enough...
Posted by: EagleX
Comments are closed-
Posted by: EagleX on Aug 21, 2008 5:30 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
The FBI Could Be Watching You on Facebook
Why a High Protein Diet May Make You Fatter
A Few Reasons Why Dave Eggers Is a Great American




