Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Why T. Boone Pickens' 'Clean Energy' Plan Is a Ponzi Scheme

By Scott Thill, AlterNet. Posted August 21, 2008.


The controversial oil magnate has made headlines for a supposed conversion to cleaner energy, but there's ample reason to be suspicious.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Scott Thill

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

"If you are going out of business, you don't go down with the ship, you get another ship. For us, it's natural gas." -- T. Boone Pickens, "Becoming a Billionaire"

You can't always get what you want, the Rolling Stones counseled. But if you try sometimes, you get what you need. Factor billions of dollars, questionable loyalties and a privatization rap sheet invested more in profit than people into the equation, and you usually can get both what you want and what you need. In the case of hyper-loaded oil tycoon T. Boone Pickens, that means having your cake on climate crisis, fossil fuel addiction, eminent domain, water privatization and corporate earnings -- and eating it too.

In July, the oil magnate unveiled a well-publicized campaign, the Pickens Plan, which begins with an obvious premise: "America is addicted to foreign oil." Pickens' proposal to kick the habit is straightforward and simple: "Building new wind-generation facilities and better utilizing our natural gas resources can replace more than one-third of our foreign oil imports in 10 years."

Sounds fair enough, especially given that Pickens and climate-crisis herald Al Gore have melded minds on the issue. But not hard enough, which is where the cracks in the Pickens Plan begin. "(Gore) asked if we could we join together and do something," Pickens explained to Bloomberg News. "I told him no, because global warming is on page two for me. Page one is foreign oil.''

That page seems to be recently written. As previously noted on either side of the red-blue divide, Pickens has funneled millions into 527s like Swift Boat Veterans for Truth, helping derail John Kerry's bid for the White House in 2004. He simultaneously committed hundreds of thousands on top of that to the election and inauguration of both Bush administrations, both spearheaded by fossil fools whose kinship with foreign oil producers not only launched an invasion into an oil-rich but nevertheless sovereign nation, but also nearly tripled the price of oil in seven years and handed campaign contributors like Exxon the most bloated earnings in corporate history.

Sure, Pickens eventually decided to stop funding political campaigns, but that deathbed conversion happened the same July that the Pickens Plan ramped up its nearly $60 million media blitz.

It gets worse. Pickens is currently the head of BP Capital Management, a secretive hedge fund (aren't they all?) that has extensive connections to the magnate's hated "foreign oil" interests. The most glaring example from its investment portfolio is Halliburton, which was once run by U.S. Vice President Dick Cheney, is currently headquartered not in America but Dubai, and whose main business segments and subsidiaries involve oil exploration, construction, production and refining. And that's not mentioning its resume on rampant fraud and corruption, especially in Iraq but also elsewhere, which has so far cost American taxpayers billions.

But Halliburton isn't the only BP Cap holding that stinks. Pickens is also heavily invested in Schlumberger, the world's largest oil services corporation; nuclear and conventional energy powerhouse Shaw Group; the embattled ex-Halliburton subsidiary Kellog Brown and Root and so on. For a very rich man who decries the influence foreign oil has on American life, Pickens sure hasn't put his money where his mouth is. He's put his money where the oil is.

"Even under the Pickens Plan," explains Treehugger's Matthew McDermott, "the U.S. will be importing a significant amount of oil. It's a step toward energy independence in that it expands renewable energy production, but I think framing this debate in terms of energy independence isn't the way to go. If you want to take a populist angle on this, pushing the very real benefits that wind power and renewables in general can have in local economies stands on much more solid ground."

If Pickens were a populist, that might be true. But he's not; he's a stone-cold capitalist whose taste for profit outweighs his desire for the common good. Pickens may have spent $3 billion on wind farms to generate enough electricity to take the load off natural gas, which is currently used to heat homes and more, but only so that it can be used for cars and trucks.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: oil, natural gas, wind, water privatization, t. boone pickens

Scott Thill runs the online mag Morphizm.com. His writing has appeared on Salon, XLR8R, All Music Guide, Wired and others.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Boone's Boondoggle ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Aug 21, 2008 1:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Boone's got it half right. The other half is pure greed that will cost America dearly.

Boone Pickens is trying his damnedest to fuel our transportation system with nat gas. He well knows that we will need trillions of dollars to convert cars and trucks and the fuel delivery system to natural gas.

Boone knows that if we go to an electrified transportation system that renewable energy will compete directly with his fossil fuel investments, especially natural gas.

Using nat gas for transportation is a dangerous and costly diversion from the real solution to our electric energy and transportation future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 18 Wheelers Plugged In? Posted by: edgar1
» Stick to playing world of warcraft Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» Nope, Rail transport. Posted by: plantsareneat
» Boone's snake oil... Posted by: Wells
Another Texas pariah
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 21, 2008 1:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Texans, oil, filthy luchre and its evangelical deification. This clown is Texas bullshit in spades and just another profiteer working a three card Monty game among oil scumbags. Does anyone need another round in the mouth colloquial dipshit in this era? Nope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Don't Mess With Texas Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Don't Mess With Texas Posted by: Moore Hognutz
» RE: Don't Mess With Texas Posted by: Jayzer
Waiting for the other rightwing shoe to drop.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 21, 2008 2:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I keep waiting for Pickens, who financed the swiftboat campaign against John Kerry in 2004, to end his next commercial with "Vote for John McCain."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Time To say Goodnight, Edgar Posted by: Moore Hognutz
» nancy pelosi is a major contributor Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
Balance Needed, As Is Oil For A Significantly Longer Time
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 21, 2008 2:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Even under the Pickens Plan," explains Treehugger's Matthew McDermott, "the U.S. will be importing a significant amount of oil."

Under ANY rational plan, including Pickens', oil will continue to play an important part in the US economy. Drilling here and continued imports will be needed. The US will find willing sellers of oil and the confirmation of recoverable reserves offshore will impact the market long before a single barrel hits the refineries, ignorant would be economists like Pelosi notwithstanding.

Invasion of foreign nations isn't needed to persuade producers to put product on the market. Sadaam Hussein was a businessman, and his large oil reserves could have been developed with US, French and Russian help without the bipartisan-supported invasion.

And oil prices as a result of all-out Iraqi production would have been lower.


A balanced, realistic energy program is needed, including drilling offshore to open up US reserves that are at least the recoverable size of Venezuela's, if not more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Drag out another OLD Reptilian Fossil Pusher Man!
Posted by: williameon on Aug 21, 2008 3:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What ever comes out of Picken's mouths is a lie and
You can bet on it!
Big Oil is pumping Millions into McPain's Camp-pain.
The FAUX MEDIA and Corpirate internet shills are
Rovien Poster Children.
Endless Relentless Propaganda.
It is turning BLACK!
The worm turns ugly again.
When will these old FARTS/Fossils retire to their Mansions and leave us alone?
In their GREED driven LIMOS!
The Corpirate Plague continues.
Same A-s holes!
Same channel.
All for ME and NONE for YOU!
Except the Bills of course.
Millions of Millions up in smoke.
No Health Care ,
No Elderly care, Jobs or Houses.
But!
We got WAR:
Mercenaries, Spies, Lies, Snooks, Crooks, Treason, Cowards, Hypocrites, Shills, Pills and various other
Losers.
The money leader owns the temple.
Bend over Father:
Bless you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Lighten up, amigo! Posted by: greenman
Funny
Posted by: Rolomax on Aug 21, 2008 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think it is funny how everyone misses the point.

Sure, Pickens is an oil magnate. Whatever. Maybe he feels guilty about what he did? Ok.

That's all there is to it. Really. The dude's hands are washed every time SUV discounts are shown on TV and when suckers buy them up.

Who has a TV? Who watches mainstream media? The sucker does both. That really is all there is to it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

controversial oil magnate
Posted by: bitsfick on Aug 21, 2008 4:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You people need a vocabulary lesson, the word is maggot, not magnate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you are way over the top
Posted by: davescott on Aug 21, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
T Boone Pickens is spending $58 million of his own money to promote a massive federal investemnt in wind power development. We are facing a climate catastrophe, and it is urgent that the wind power Pickens is promoting be brought on line at a large scale. Period.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» If it needs to be Subsided Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: you are way over the top Posted by: Quannah
» RE: you are way over the top Posted by: chobiewan
Deathbed Conversion
Posted by: ozonehole on Aug 21, 2008 4:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure that Pickins will always be motivated first and foremost by anything that can stuff more money into his bulging pockets. Like most of the geriatric super-rich, he thinks that he can take his money with him. Surely Satan can be bribed just like the US Congress, right?

That having been said, in corporate-owned America, unholy alliances are sometimes the only way progressives can get anything done. So if we want the minimum wage raised, for example, we've got to attach a rider to a bill funding the Iraq War.

So what I'm saying is that we shake Pickins slimy hand and see if we can at least get wind power deployed on a wide scale. It's not the ultimate answer, but whatever bone the corporatists can be persuaded to throw to us, it's the best we can hope for. That's how far down the toilet America has gone.

Who knows, maybe as Pickins becomes even older and more demented, we can get him on board for solar, electric cars, and improved rail service. One can always hope.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Deathbed Conversion Posted by: Qilpole
» RE: Deathbed Conversion Posted by: orwellturns
» Neither...nor... Posted by: JakobFabian01
» RE: Oh, please... Posted by: greenman
fully electric
Posted by: lclark on Aug 21, 2008 4:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While everything said in the article may be true, the value of the plan getting exposure is that the ability of wind to provide a substantial part of our electrical needs will no longer be allowed to be presented as fanciful. So we can go from there.........and ignore his trust to replace oil with natural gas and simply replace it with electricity. So much of the oil imported is used for personal transportation and for the generation of heat.
What would be transformative would be to :
1).produce abundant and cheap electricity with a revised electrical grid that would allow the efficient transport of that electricity from where generated to where needed, and require that the materials and manufactured be American sources...steel and wind turbines. That would generate jobs and a revitilized manufacturing base that employs many with good pay.
2). use existing infastructure to convert national freight and mass transit to electrical based transportation.
3). require the auto manufacturers to provide fully ( low end) plug in electrical vehicles for personal transportation and regional freight, if they are going to be allowed to continue to sell gasoline based cars.( Ev's have been viable since the '70's.)
4). Same thing with furnaces that heat water to provide home heating.. require electrical based furnaces for heating water...that would allow simple and efficient conversion to electricity for heating purposes in the northeast and midwest where heating fuel is used.
Just as we used to undertake public works in the national interest, if we used renewable energy sources to produce abundant electricity as well as converted to electricity as the source of heating and transportation we would:
- eliminate dependence on oil imports
- eliminate trade deficits
- revitilize our manufacturing base and generate new industries
- produce abundant jobs required to manufacture, engineer, deploy, and maintain this system

What we don't need is:
- nuclear power. Pools of radioactive waste still remain.
- replacement of dependance on oil with dependence on natural gas. That perpetuates the 'hand on the spigot' mechanism that allows a few to control the many. Wind turbines deconstruct that control mechanism and decentralize energy production.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» What about Makeup? Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
» RE: fully electric Posted by: Carol Burns
» RE: fully electric Posted by: lclark
Get Rid of the Internal Combustion Engine in Automobiles --Period!
Posted by: pinnacle on Aug 21, 2008 5:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author of this article is talking about the wrong things!. Finally there are two recognizable names attached to voices calling for alternative energy --- Pickens and Gore. Maybe the people in this country will begin to listen. The gasoline powered internal combustion engine used in our vehicles for over 100 years has to go!. It's as simple as that! And, by the way, who should really give a damn if Pickens has oil and gas interests. The part of his message that should be heard loud and clear is that we must break our dependence on foreign oil. Forget the price of oil. If the bastards shut off the spigot it doesn't matter what the price is. Remember the early 70's.

Certainly we will come up with alternatives to using natural gas to fuel automobiles. What? I don't know. We just got started --- about 30 years late. Anyhow there will always be a use for all the oil that we and anybody else can produce so who gives a damn if Pickens makes some more money. The point is that he is out front shouting for this nation to do something. That's called leadership and it's what the President and other politicians should be doing. Instead of questioning the man's motive the author of this article should be cheering the fact that he's doing something to get us off our ignorant rear ends!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Vote what is it good for
Posted by: solrev on Aug 21, 2008 5:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until we the people institute a government to secure the entitlements of life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness, Pickens will pick your pocket. We need a national energy policy that makes sense and there is no way to get that from the people you vote for. The 1% of the population that has 20% of the wealth is against foreign oil because that is their money going to foreign countries. Everything was cool until those foreigners started nationalizing their oil industries. To make matters worst those foreigners have the gull to threaten to change oil dollars to oil euros. We have a lot of major problems and we do not have the resources to solve them all at the same time. Pollution both co2 and particle can cause a 50% decline in the population in a heartbeat. Wind is the best replacement for coal generated electricity and that should be our moon base alpha project. Solve that and we can buy time to solve our oil problem. Unfortunately the people you are going to vote for will sprinkle money around to the masters and continue to fiddle while the first trumpet plays on. PS spare me the nuke scenario. Obama does not like nukes because like me he is from Illinois, and we are setting on a 1000 tons of nuclear waste now. Talk about a Yuccy Mountain. We can only use nukes as a back up but not a primary source.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Former Republican
Posted by: johnchase34 on Aug 21, 2008 5:20 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article about TBoone has too much dissing ad hominem; and too much guilt by association, too much bitching about his motives and because his solution is not perfect.

I'd like to see some thoughtful alternatives to get out of this fossil fuel hole we -- yes, all of us -- have dug ourselves into.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Former Republican Posted by: peaceworker
» RE: Former Republican Posted by: Marshalldoc
» RE: Former Republican Posted by: greenman
Someone NEEDS to get this article to Ed Schultz
Posted by: Phred42 on Aug 21, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
fat bastard seems incapable of seeing through TBone's game.

Either that or Big Eddy has a piece of this pie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Ed Schuitz sucks up to the corn lobby Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals
"Addicted to foreign oil" is NOT an obvious premise, unless heroin addiction is only a problem if. .
Posted by: Beck on Aug 21, 2008 5:30 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . .the heroin is foreign, not domestic.

Here's yet another phrase that's in the common usage and even liberals have bought into. An addiction is an addiction. The location of the source isn't important, especially as any new oil extracted here will probably be sold overseas, despite McCain and trolls acting as though it's the only solution to our problem.

I guess if the addicts are running low on our fixes, a new supply needs to be found. But the addicts are still addicts. Maybe the pushers here seem easier to deal with? They're no more honest, we should acknowledge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Truth About The Pickens Plan
Posted by: Phred42 on Aug 21, 2008 5:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Also - Here's a 2 min video (with 1 min of info) on subject - worth watching

Truth About The Pickens Plan

video

Trading one Monopoly for another is NOT an answer. It's time to DECENTRALIZE source

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe honest business dealings are vital to avoiding global warming
Posted by: PaulK on Aug 21, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author's fear is that T. Boone Pickens has every reason to betray the environmental movement as soon as he gets what he wants, which involves profits. Maybe business as usual is the problem.

In other countries they look for, and do business with, good corporate citizens.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pickens
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 21, 2008 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL, for people like Pickens, "Profit" is all that matters. Everything else is a moot point.

JM
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Here's More - Draining a major Aqufier
Posted by: Phred42 on Aug 21, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Beyond Wind Plan, Pickens Eyes Pipelines in Drought-Ridden U.S.

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/earth/4275059.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What does this Big Oil greenwashing scumbag say about HEMP 4 FUEL?
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 21, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me guess. Unless he can privatize it in TX, he will not support it or like wind energy, he'll just misuse it as a window dressing. Like Algore, Pickens is nothing but a FRAUD. He's for more oil and gas drilling, coal mining, nuclear reactors, and even importing fossil fuels despite his claiming to oppose it. Also, in addition to his no show on hemp if he really cares about the need to reduce dependence on foreign oil, why is he totally silent on the need to BADLY improve the public transportation infrastructure ?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Always Critical
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 21, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love America and what it stands for, but I am always critical of privatizing water supplies and other resources that are deemed a necessity in our society. I find it pretty sickening that a big business essentially has the ability to force people to pay out whatever it pleases to "drink at this watering hole." Now I wouldn't mind if a small business man did this and several other (unconnected) businesses competed but these conglomerate entities are essentially one big club and therefore have no need to compete, which means higher price for lower quality.

Plus, who knows what they will or will not put in the water supply? Will they get cheap and dump who knows what in the water supply, getting people sick?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» One or the Other Posted by: pdxjoe
» It's a matter of scale. Posted by: JakobFabian01
Pickens is aTOOL!
Posted by: ZenQuixote on Aug 21, 2008 6:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he tries to portray himself as some sort of humanitarian... but in the last 2 years he has "generously" donated over 300 million dollars to oklahoma state university, mostly so they could use eminent domain to build a new footbal stadium...

screw that guy, and anyone that looks like him!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: don't worry...It's Chinatown! Posted by: BigElectricCat
There is no such thing as nuclear "waste"
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Aug 21, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We don't recycle nuclear fuel because spent fuel is valuable and people steal it.
The place it went that it wasn't supposed to go to is Israel. This happened in a
small town near Pittsburgh, PA circa 1970. A company called Numec was in the
business of reprocessing nuclear fuel. I almost took a job there, designing a
nuclear battery for a heart pacemaker. [A nuclear battery would have the
advantage of lasting many times as long as any other battery, eliminating many
surgeries to replace batteries.] Numec did NOT have a reactor. Numec "lost"
half a ton of enriched uranium. It wound up in Israel. The Israelis have fueled
both their nuclear power plants and their nuclear weapons by stealing nuclear
"waste." It could work for any other country, such as Iran or the United States.
It is only when you don't have access to nuclear "waste" that you have to do the
difficult process of enriching uranium, unless you have a Canadian "Candu"
reactor that runs on unenriched uranium.
Numec is no longer in business. The reprocessing of nuclear fuel in the US
stopped. That was the only politically possible solution at that time, given that
private corporations did the reprocessing. My solution would be to reprocess the
fuel at a Government Owned Government Operated [GOGO] facility. At a
GOGO plant, bureaucracy and the multiplicity of ethnicity and religion would
disable the transportation of uranium to Israel or to any unauthorized place.
Nothing heavier than a secret would get out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pickens' Politics
Posted by: astockton on Aug 21, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
T. Boone claims he votes Republican and always will, because when he gets to heaven, he doesn't want to explain to his great-greats why he voted for a Democrat. Maybe he should reconsider his assumption that heaven is where he'll be going.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Pickens' Politics Posted by: Carol Burns
Maintaining control.....
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 21, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is yet another example of a rich man trying to maintain his control of Americans! This 3 card monty game needs to end!

Americans need to wake up to reality. We are standing on the threshold of not just an economic collapse but an environmental catastrophe of our own making! We can not drill our way out, nor can we keep putting off the inevitable decisions that need to be made. Future generations will look back and scream what were they thinking!?

The experts agree that even if the oil companies started drilling offshore today, it would still take at least 10 years before any productive outflow would be achieved! We need to fund alternatives, and stop these robber barrons from profiteering at the expense of the common good!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

laughable
Posted by: willd4change on Aug 21, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why the discussion, common sence will tell you the plan is unubtanable. You need sustained wind to generate electricity so the power they would get is a drop in the bucket. Solar doesnt work because of cloud cover, so most solar pannels never work at peak performance, check it out for yourself. The problem is simple, the defence department is the largest consumer of oil and gas, NOT US. You really think the boys in the defence department would cut their big bussiness profits in half or more lmfao.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Power to Save the World; The Truth About Nuclear Energy
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Aug 21, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Power to Save the World; The Truth About Nuclear Energy" by Gwyneth Cravens, 2007
Finally a truthful book about nuclear power.

Page 13 has a chart of greenhouse gas emissions from electricity
production. Nuclear power produces less greenhouse gas than
any other source, includinh hydro, solar and wind.
Page 15: The Sierra Club used to favor nuclear power over hydro
but switched for political reasons.
Page 17: Coal kills 24000 Americans and 400000 Chinese every
year. Nuclear has killed ZERO Americans total. Hydro has
killed 1000 Americans and hundreds of thousands of Chinese.

I'm on page 25.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Wrong on every count Posted by: PaulC
waynep
Posted by: waynep on Aug 21, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think that we need be as careful in trusting Pickens as we are in attacking him. Has he been part of the problem..yes. Has he divested himself of involvement..apparently not. That does not negate that his support for such things as wind power "allows" some of our conservative citizens who do not own oil to give consideration to wind not being just another "liberal" idea that they can dismiss in a knee jerk reaction. The money that Pickens has put into this promotion is money that we do not have, so that is also a good thing. The biggest fear that I have was spoken clearly by in a previous c