Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' in Stiller's 'Tropic Thunder' Misses the Target

By Annabelle Gurwitch, AlterNet. Posted August 15, 2008.


We can't let art turn into syrupy, sanctimonious after-school specials just to avoid being labeled as offensive.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Annabelle Gurwitch

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On Tuesday night I attended the premiere of Ben Stiller's Tropic Thunder. Strolling in past the protesters, (groups representing individuals with developmental disabilities), was a little troubling, as I have rarely passed a picket line that I wasn't tempted to join.

Protesting wages for car wash workers? Call me and I'll be there! Demanding a fair wage for WGA writers? Been there, done that. SEIU, AFL/CIO, UAW: I'll walk your line. But protesting the contents of a comedy, that's a line I won't cross, or in this case I will cross. Literally.

The protesters' concern centers around the repeated use of the word "retarded" to describe the inept performance Ben Stiller's character, Tugg Speedman, has given while portraying a mentally handicapped man in an absolutely awful Oscar baiting movie entitled Simple Jack. Call me kookoo, no offense to any members of the kookoo community, but the target of Tropic Thunder's satirical humor is squarely aimed at Hollywood movies and the people who make them, (not to mention the movie going public) and though I don't doubt the sincerity of the boycotters, it seems a little intellectually challenged.

If you came of age on a diet of Vietnam movies where heroes fell dramatically in a rain of bullets -- think the Christ-like demise of the Willem Dafoe character in Platoon or the closer-than-close-up pathos of Tom Cruise in Oliver Stone's Born on the Fourth of July -- and you found yourself simultaneously weeping and rolling your eyes at the same time, and if you're like me and never even went to see Tom Hanks give his 3-hanky performance in Forrest Gump or Sean Penn's moving turn in I Am Sam because you already knew what his performance would be like -- poignant and yet dignified in its restraint, after all -- as Downey's character in the movie notes, "he didn't go full retard" -- then you'll enjoy Tropic Thunder.

Call me a curmudgeon, not to offend any members of the curmudgeon community, but at this point, I'll take satire over sincerity. Why? Well, for one reason, I was a John Edwards supporter and I bought into his 99 percent truth telling, personal mythology and seemingly selfless desire to lead the nation, so forgive me if I've grown suspicious of sensitivity.

I wouldn't be narcissistic enough to say I know what Ben Stiller had in mind, but upon reflection, I can't help but think that Stiller held a mirror up and what was reflected was not only the self absorption of actors, but the greed and narcissism in America today.

Sure, I'll never forget Meryl Streep's moral dilemma in Sophie's Choice, laboring over which child to save, but Tropic Thunder gives us Mathew McConaughey ponderously weighing the merits and morality of acquiring his own G4 at the expense of sacrificing his best friend. Its a laugh-out-loud commentary on the winner-take-all state of the American economy. As for Tom Cruise's surprising role as greed incarnate? Is it some demeaning contrived character? Well, I have actually heard much of his dialogue delivered verbatim, from a real life Hollywood power broker, so I found it funny not for its outrageousness, but for its comedic verisimilitude. And at time when everyone in the public eye has been labeled self important and ego driven from Eliot Spitzer, Chuck Hagel, and Peter Cook to the new narcissist poster boy himself, John Edwards, what could be more topical than a movie about narcissism and the lure of fame, power and pussy?

I fear that protests like this will retard (so to speak) the creative process and threaten to turn art into syrupy sanctimonious after-school specials. Besides, if any group should protest, it's actors, but unfortunately, we really don't have a leg to stand on. If we want to be reminded of how silly we are, all we have to do is think about Sharon Stone telling the world that the recent earthquake in China was caused by bad karma.

But if you need any more evidence of how ridiculous and vain actors are, as the lights went up in the movie theater, my husband who has all of three seconds of screen time playing an over-the-top French waiter in an over-the-top parody of an over-the-top movie trailer in Tropic Thunder, leaned over and asked me if his performance was, "just over the top or too over the top?" Not to be outdone, as we drove home, I waxed nostalgic about a phone call I once received from a film producer, not unlike one of the rants delivered by Mr. Cruise in the film, during which the producer informed me that if I didn't follow his wishes, I would never work again, and he would repeatedly do things to my person that I couldn't possibly detail in this publication. With a sigh, I fondly recalled that moment as a wistful reminder of a time when I had just enough of a profile in Hollywood to receive a threateningly memorable call like that. Oh, the good old days.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: comedy, tropic thunder, ben stiller

Writer and actress Annabelle Gurwitch currently prognosticates on both politics and pop culture on National Public Radio's Day to Day. Her column Fired Up appears regularly in The Nation, and her essays have appeared in publications including the Los Angeles Times, Glamour, Child, Premiere, and Penthouse.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bravo
Posted by: jebpgh on Aug 15, 2008 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have Steve Booman elsewhere today documenting the real, non-satiric, hate-filled and death-dealing speech of the shock jocks. Where's the outrage there? It took Michael Savage calling out all autistic children to even get a little wiggle of rage from the people he trashed. And where was the protest for the movie that clowned about the special olympics? Stiller is one of the authentically creative comedic writers in our world and I am so glad he didn't move an inch on the dialogue to accomodate the protest. If you can't make a parody without apologizing for the parody - then you can't make a parody. Monty Python beware!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bravo Posted by: Blink
» RE: Bravo Posted by: jebpgh
» RE: Bravo Posted by: Blink
» RE: Bravo Posted by: jebpgh
» RE: Bravo Posted by: Blink
» RE: Bravo Posted by: jebpgh
Thank You
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Aug 15, 2008 12:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now I'm going to watch this movie this week

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never seen Forrest Gump?
Posted by: jroth420 on Aug 15, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow. Missing out on a great movie in my opinion.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fail Artical
Posted by: Love Me, I'm a Liberal on Aug 15, 2008 1:13 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article belong in a right wing anti-PC website. Not Alternet. I hate when the fauxgressives rear their ugly head.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fail Artical Posted by: ikonoklast
» RE: Fail Artical Posted by: Tombo
» RE: Fail Artical Posted by: oregonox
» RE: Fail Artical Posted by: clvngodess
» RE: Fail Artical Posted by: mejsmith
"Idiot" "Imbecile" and "Moron" are actually technical terms for mental retardation.
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 15, 2008 1:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Retard" really no longer means "mentally retarded person". Most psychologists use the term "developmentally disabled" now.

It used to be that these 3 terms were descriptive for IQ level:
Idiot meant an IQ of below 25 or so
Imbecile meant an IQ of between 25 and 50
Moron meant an IQ of between 50 and 75

They no longer mean that, and those terms are no longer even offensive to most people. War is offensive. The word "retard" is just a silly word.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OK, "Mentally Ill H" Posted by: fanny666
» RE: OK, "Mentally Ill H" Posted by: Crazy H
PC Gone Wild
Posted by: countingdaisies on Aug 15, 2008 3:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politically correct is not!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keeping it light
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Aug 15, 2008 3:46 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Now and then, it's good to see some written proof that progressives aren't all a bunch of PC geeks with their panties in a knot.

I mean, the President of the United States is a total retard, and you don't hear him whining about it, do you? Of course, he no longer has Karl Rove around to explain what the big words mean.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shameless self-promotion
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 15, 2008 3:55 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been accused by AlterNet trolls of "shamlessly" promoting my nonfiction book about Bush, which shall remain nameless for the purpose of this comment. But pardon an overused cliche, Annabelle Gurwitch takes the cake!

After slogging through convoluted phrasing that exclaimed, "See what a wonderful writer I am!" I came upon the reason why Gurwitch submitted the article to AlterNet.

Her motive revealed itself in the sentence that said, "my husband who has all of three seconds of screen time playing an over-the-top French waiter...." .

I immediately felt retarded --more specifically, stupid for wasting my time reading a movie review by someone who has a vested interest in the film's success.

Having detected the strong odor of shameless self-promotion, I clicked on the hot link AlterNet had provided -- her name -- and accessed Gurwitch's personal Web site. This time her message shouted, "See what a wonderful actress I am!"

I immediately wondered how much AlterNet charged Gurwitch for her ad.

Regarding "Tropic Thunder." I will definitely see it for one reason only: Ben Stiller is the funniest actor alive. As for the movie's treatment of mental retardation, I will reserve judgement about how insensitive it was towards a tragic human condition.

One thing I won't be looking for is the three-second performance of Glory-hungry Gurwich'e hubby.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shameless self-promotion Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: Shameless self-promotion Posted by: rdriley
What a joke!
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 15, 2008 5:05 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unreal, cant use the "N" word, now we cant use the "R" word. You have got to be kidding me. Seems like the only RETARDS here are the RETARDS that are complaining, go get a hobby RETARDS.

JTUltimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Can we say 'tard? Posted by: countingdaisies
» RE: What a joke! Posted by: Tombo
» lynch Posted by: rickiey
Who raised you folks?
Posted by: iconoblaster on Aug 16, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was taught not to make fun of those less fortunate than me.
To read the posts here one would think that's some kind of pc training that isn't appropriate in the modern world.
Well I'll take it over your heartless cruel jokes at the expense of those who can't defend themselves any day.
I suggest you bop on over to the local mental health center in your county -
spend a day working among those folks you ignorantly dismiss as retards.
It isn't funny - it isn't acceptable to do so -
under any circumstances -
& it sure as hell isn't acceptable simply because it's a movie -
what kind of half-assed logic is that?
This belief that it's okay because it's just a movie -
hell folks that's exactly the kind of logic that has brought you the current state of the mainsteam media like Fox -
you think that's okay, too?
try walking a mile in their shoes -
you couldn't do it -
you'd have neither the gumption nor the balls.
For most of you -
you wouldn't even have the balls to try it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Who raised you folks? Posted by: Caffrey1
» RE: Who raised you folks? Posted by: Tombo
» RE: Who raised you folks? Posted by: mejsmith
» RE: Who raised you folks? Posted by: Spokes
» You're right. Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: Who raised you folks? Posted by: Tim V
» RE: Who raised you folks? Posted by: Duncable
Otto .
Posted by: otto on Aug 16, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Haven't seen the movie, but it sounds like criticizing Mel Brooks and "Blazing Saddles" for the open and repeated use of the word "nigger". It obviously wasn't an example of prejudice against Blacks, but showed how stupid many of us whites are in our attitudes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Showbiz Kids
Posted by: DeaconJ on Aug 16, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reminds my of my favorite Steely Dan song. From the album Countdown to Ecstasy:

Chorus-
Show biz kids making movies
Of themselves you know they
Don't give a f¨#k about anybody else

Ben Stiller and Morton Downey Jr. (yeah i love getting that name wrong) define dynastic schlock spewn onto the silver sickening screen. These man whores will do anything to show off their Hollywood bods.

And as a Caveat why not do a comedy on the Iraq war. Oh thats right it's the escapist movies that make the big money these days. Wink wink.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Movie is very funny and not offensive to the Retarded
Posted by: 113121 on Aug 16, 2008 9:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to see it and had a great time. The waiter scene was certainly over the top but in a good way. I'm going to see the movie again because some of the humor was so complex I know it will be even better the second time. I've recommended it to my friends and family including those who work with the mentally disabled although their organization has the word retarded in it and they have to go by initials now so they won't "offend". This film should get an Oscar becuase it never ever "went full retard".The Coast Guard should go ahead and boycott though.Just kidding.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Intelligence, Weight, and Politics are the Only Acceptable Ways to Make Fun of People Anymore
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Aug 16, 2008 10:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gender, Race, Religion, Intelligence, Weight, and Politics are attributes which have all been made fun of in the past.

Gender and race are no longer PC ways to make fun of others and they each have terms to refer to people who do make fun of others regarding those attributes. Sexist and Racist.

Religion is a little murky there is heretic, religious bigot, or anti-semetic, anti-catholic but those terms don't have the hold or stigma that sexism and racism do.

Intelligence, weight, and politics are largely still considered by enough people to be ok to make fun of. You don't get pulled off the air or eviscerated in the press for making fun of those attributes.

I wonder how long that will last.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Protests hit the target: they made people think
Posted by: blaser on Aug 16, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Annabelle Gurwitch's "Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' ... Misses the Target" shows that protesters hit the target by making people think. (I do mean to offend the masses of people accustomed to not thinking about the politics of disability issues). After such movies as "The Ringer," we know that laughing about disability issues can be consistent with thinking about minority rights. But as we learn in childhood (sometimes), there is a huge difference between laughing with people, and laughing at them. We can accept metaphors like the "marketplace of ideas" uncritically by limiting our attention to sales figures for CocaCola, plasma TVs, and Tropic Thunder. Or, as the protesters attest, we can think about the politics of art, of language, and of disability.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you've seen the movie...
Posted by: jgrossnas on Aug 16, 2008 1:22 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... then you'd know that the lines in it about 'retards' are spoken by two obviously idiotic and self-absorbed jerks (Stiller's and Downey's characters) who we're meant to laugh at. It's meant as another example of how dumb and shallow both of them ultimately are. It's about context, you know?

And ultimately, the movie is pretty damn funny too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stiller Funny, Gurwitz Not
Posted by: mtc on Aug 16, 2008 1:48 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem isn't the word "retard" in Tropic Thunder, it's the way Annabelle Gurwitz writes about it. Articles have been written about Mel Brooks that defend Blazing Saddles or EVEN Springtime for Hitler, but they didn't make fun of blacks or Jews for being offended. Gurwitz, however, did make fun. She called the boycotters "intellectually challenged" and said the protests will retard (yuk yuk) the creative process. Maybe I'm being PC, after all PC has become a code word for "shut up and go away," so I won't say anything about oppression and privilege and any-isms. But I will say the article enjoyed a kind of IQ complacency that felt more mean than funny.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politically correct
Posted by: sicntired on Aug 16, 2008 3:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The people that micro manage everything that's said or written need to get a life.If they can use the word' special' to describe themselves and hold something called an Olympics they have no business complaining about language bastardization.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Tropic Thunder" sucks
Posted by: Blink on Aug 16, 2008 4:43 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
After paying $20 for tickets and enduring at least 30 minutes of advertising and previews, we walked out of "Tropic Thunder" after about ten minutes of this unfunny, idiotic movie. Don't waste your time or money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: "Tropic Thunder" sucks Posted by: cj0204
Have we forgotten what Comedy is about?
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Aug 16, 2008 5:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Does anyone remember Don Rickles? How about Richard Pryor or George Carlin or even Dave Chapelle? How about the Wayans brothers? All very funny people. They made jokes out of what 'proper society' thought was racist,distasteful or 'dirty'. To tell you the truth...the english language is chock full of proper words that are just as bad as 'retard'. which usually means to slow down,as in, 'to retard the growth'. I came across a word I was given pause by. It was in a sentence saying 'the niggardly europeans'. I had to look it up. So I hit dictionary on the sidebar and ZAP,there it was. It means cheap,stingy,miserly,tightwad etc.,etc.
So the researcher in me took over and I looked up 'nigger'. As expected it was termed 'extremely derogatory'. No surprize there, for it is. But there were five definitions of the word. That was a surprize.
But even more surprizing was that one of those definitions was considered kind. That is if you used the word in relation to the Irish. So calling an Irish person "One of those nigger Irish' was a good thing. So I guess it would be proper,since Bush has Irish in him, to start every question with 'Nigger Please!!'
I'm Irish too and a Hippie so when you see me on the street it's OK to say;
'There goes that Nigger Irish Hippie' But that would be retarded.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

think, damn you
Posted by: richardpmendola on Aug 17, 2008 8:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually going to the trouble of protesting the movie is certainly nothing I would do but. . .

Yes "retard" can be a hurtful label to people who do not function as well intellectually, whether they are technically retarded or not. It is never used as anything but derogatory. As a label, it ignores the whole person. Many retarded people are beautiful individuals the rest of us should be more like in certain ways.

That said, you aren't a great hitter because you can knock easy tosses out of the ballpark. Low humor does just that and propels fifteen year old boys of all sexes and ages into laughter.

Satire can and does use low humor or it can use the most subtle of ironies, but the object should never include skewering the innocent. Or is that just a bonus?

Freedom of speech, yes. Sensitivity , yes. The strange contortions that political correctness can get itself into, no.

I haven't seen the movie, but could a different word have been used "Buffoon" comes to mind as a funny and underused epithet. Or something like "You're really sloooow,Jack" Indeed, the great comic actors can do more with a glance than the fifteen year olds can do with a torpedo.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great review
Posted by: Parcival01 on Aug 17, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I almost never go to "the movies." But my wife is out of town, and I didn't think she'd like the violence I'd anticipated in this film. It was a Thursday afternoon so I didn't encounter any protestors.

Protestors? You're kidding, right? It was a comedy, and, as the critic points out, in many ways an OVER THE TOP one!

With due respect for the developmentally disabled (Sly Stallone?), to protest such a satire is to challenge the credibility of the left. I was just watching a Jerome Corsi testimony in which he accused Obama of fearing any criticism. So Corsi became a satire of himself. Let's not become that.

I'm glad this review was from somewhat of an insider. I agree with her appraisal of the Cruise character but hoped he was more of a caricature than reality. But that he is close to reality isn't much of a surprise. So we should invite satires on such realities, not challenge them to demonstrate our heartfelt fuzziness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who cares if they say "retard"? That whole movie was so ridiculously stupid I wanted to cry!
Posted by: cj0204 on Aug 17, 2008 10:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wasn't offended by anything in that movie. Except the fact that I paid to see it. It was HORRIBLE!!!! We walked out, not because it was offensive, but because it was not funny, just completely idiotic. All I could think of every time everyone in the theater laughed was this article: http://www.alternet.org/story/95109/

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

grand parent of a retard
Posted by: sedort on Aug 18, 2008 7:31 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you had a family diagnosed with autism you would not write a story like this. You are the retard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tim V
Posted by: Tim V on Aug 22, 2008 1:33 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The recent protest over 'retard' as a put-down validates my distaste for frequent use of this slur among my coworkers. There were no intellectually disabled people at my recent work sites, but 'retard' as a put-down reflects a profoundly unjust attitude, namely, that some people (i.e. the intellectually disabled) deserve to be put down over things they can't help.
The use of 'retard' should be legally permitted (as should protests against "Tropic Thunder"), but it should also be frowned upon - it should be viewed in the same way as we view, say, calling a doctor, teacher or professor by his or her first name.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]