Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Who Orchestrated the Fall of Bear Stearns?

By Nicholas von Hoffman, The Nation. Posted August 15, 2008.


Americans know all the sleazy details of the Edwards affair. But they remain in the dark about a scandal that affects the livelihoods of millions.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Nicholas von Hoffman

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

This is one scandal the National Enquirer has not reported. No babies with mystery fathers, no former vice presidential candidates cowering in a hotel basement to escape the paparazzi.

This scandal, relegated to the business pages if covered at all, is un-juicy compared to l'affaire Edwards, with a wife betrayed, children humiliated, hypocrisy exposed -- it is a small wonder, after the ethical hemming and hawing, that the big-time publishers and broadcasters jumped in to take part in the fun.

Yet, entertainment value aside, the Edwards scandal directly affected almost nobody but the Edwards family and a few disillusioned followers. The Bear Stearns conspiracy scandal affected and continues to affect tens of thousands of people in all sorts of ways.

As the story lacked prurient interest, it was left to Bloomberg.com to unearth persuasive information that the Wall Street firm was seemingly brought down by a conspiracy that netted its participants a profit of upwards of $250 million on an investment of $1.7 million in a week or so. Nice work, if you can get it.

The putative conspirators, whose name or names have not been made public, pulled off their heist with ease. They bought a bunch of what Wall Street calls "puts." A put is a piece of paper guaranteeing its owner the right to sell 100 shares of stock at a stated price within a specified period of time. In the case of this bank job, the period of time was as little as five days.

With Bear Stearns stock selling at over $60 a share, somebody bought the right to sell almost 6 million shares at $30 a share. To make money on these puts, the price of Bear Stearns stock would have to lose more than half its value fast. In fact, in the days immediately after the unknown person or persons bought all those puts, Bears Stearns stock dropped like a duck shot out of the sky, to a price of $10 a share or less. The persons behind the scheme then bought Bear Stearns shares at $10 or less and exercised the puts, thereby selling them for $30 and pocketing the difference.

How could someone know that in a matter of days the fifth-largest trading house on Wall Street would see the value of its stock drop to next to nothing?

"Even if I were the most bearish man on earth, I can't imagine buying puts 50 percent below the price with just over a week to expiration," says Thomas Haugh, general partner of Chicago-based options trading firm PTI Securities & Futures LP, cited by Gary Matsumoto of Bloomberg. "It's not even on the page of rational behavior, unless you know something."

Then with the price of stock still above $50, somebody bought puts giving them the right to sell the stock at five dollars a share -- which is about what you would expect to be the price of the shares of a company in bankruptcy. Matsumoto quotes one broker as saying, "When you buy $5 strikes [puts] when the stock is trading over $50, you either have to be manipulating, or you have to have insider information." Another broker quoted in his report remarked, "Nobody in their right mind would buy that put unless you knew what was going down."

The timing of the purchase of the puts screams out that a well-placed person inside Bear Stearns was telling someone on the outside of the firm's increasing confusion and division. At a crucial moment when rumors were rife on Wall Street that Bear Stearns customers would not be able to withdraw their money, the stock market was hit by a large number of orders to sell Bear Stearns stock. That augmented the force of the rumors of insolvency already working to depress the price, even as panicky customers fell over one another getting their money out. There are too many disastrous coincidences here to be explained just by bad luck.

The name of the bearer of this bad luck remains hidden. A spokeswoman for the Chicago Board of Options Exchange, where the puts were bought, has refused to tell Bloomberg the name.

We know the name of the mother of the baby John Edwards did or did not sire, but we are in the dark as to who may have authored the scheme that cost thousands of people their jobs and their savings and that gave the financial markets a major kick down the mountain, a fall that will continue to take millions of us with them.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: economy, conspiracy, stock market, finance, bear stearns

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
That's
Posted by: ankhet on Aug 15, 2008 12:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the idea.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If you had in mukasey a sliver of integrity
Posted by: weathered on Aug 15, 2008 2:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to prosecute the AIG/BearSterns, the Hank Greenbergs and all the other theives, then you'd risk exp[osing just how compromised the Justice Dept. is.

If you think a 'put' or call position was notable w/this little BearSterns episode, you'll begin to see how much $$ was moved in and around 9/11.

Arrest Silverstein/Bushcon and heal or stay stuck in the Lies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank you!
Posted by: ladyoracle on Aug 15, 2008 3:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article is Alternet at its best, filling in a gap from the mainstream media. I am left wanting more, though. I suppose congress isn't going to pursue the case or we would've heard something by now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

so
Posted by: sre on Aug 15, 2008 4:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The collapse of Bear-Stearns was a "scandal". There really is no "economic collapse" coming, or indeed any economic trouble at all. The collapse of Bear Stearns was unrelated to the so-called mortgage problem, which is really only a few people taking justly deserved consequences of their own foolishness.
I'll say it again: Nothing's happening. Nothing will happen. Long live the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: so Posted by: weathered
» Officer Barr-Brady speaks! Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: so Posted by: jareilly
syed salamah ali mahdi
Posted by: salamah on Aug 15, 2008 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, the contents of the report were broadcast by National Public Radio in the form of an interview with, I forget who, may be the author himself. As the PUT Scheme is now in the public arena, chances of copy cat REPEATS are VALID. You see, the RICHIE RICH are all ganged together to become RICHER RICHIE RICH and what a GANG they are! They work on the principle of "Scratch my back, I'll scratch yours". It's there in politics,in the media,in getting MoD contracts in Iraq, in Insider Trading and now this 'put'ting'. Nobody in Govt or at Capitol hill will change any of this. They are all part of this scratching business; Democrats,Republicans, Media Owners, AIPAC and such like. It's good business for both the scratchers and the scratched and if done softly it could be Ummm,Oooh boy! So, join the CLUB and forget everything ever taught to you by your parents, your school text books and by your pastors, minus of course, the rapturistic tele-evangelists! Live and let others die, whichever way they choose to!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: syed salamah ali mahdi Posted by: zipoka
Moedoc
Posted by: moedoc on Aug 15, 2008 5:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting article...if you know nothing about the markets. First, when you buy puts, there is no requirement to own the stock. So if the price did drop to $30, you make your money and call it a day. Second, the scandal that was Bear Sterns was PUBLIC knowledge back in August of 2007. One of their funds was being run by a guy accused of hiring underaged girls to have sex with, Jimmy Cayne was known as a "hail fellow, well met" but no rocket scientist, and no Ace Gereenberg. And he ousted his heir apparent.

With the credit crises looming, that was also very visible yet folks put their heads in the sand, Bear Sterns fall was destined. Did people take advantage of their being on life support? Probably. Did they cause their demise? Not even close.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Moedoc Posted by: leafsong1
Who Orchestrated the Fall of Bear Stearns?
Posted by: astralman on Aug 15, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new world order and the babylonian brotherhood.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Who bought the puts?
Posted by: zoz on Aug 15, 2008 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't help but also wonder about the people who bought the 'puts'. The stock is trading at $60 and someone promises to sell you shares at $30? Wouldn't you hesitate at such a 'good deal'? Obviously a great many shares were involved. I'm also curious if there were a few big buyers or a lot of smaller buyers?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bla?
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Aug 15, 2008 8:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just look at the chart of Bear Stearns. It was falling like a rock even before it hit 60. Only a fool would buy it. Its no wonder people were shorting it. So they should. It was already dead at that point. Look at BAC's chart from May to July. Classic example of a stock heading toward zero. Only govt/Fed intervention can turn these around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corporate Media Ignores Corporate Crime
Posted by: FoonTheElder on Aug 15, 2008 8:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The big corporate media depends on big corporations for its advertising revenues. That is why you see multitudes of reports, investigations and documentary programs on violent crime, the mafia and scandals, but not one on corporate crime.

The most important part of media is not to entertain and inform, but to generate advertising revenue. The last thing they want to jeopardize is their revenue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe Edwards story relates to this too...
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 15, 2008 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Edwards is a DLC'er- the Corps Blue arm.
Edwards also was into Hedge funds-one of Wall Streets Casino tables.
One only needs to put all the evidence Hillary revealed during her campaign to see clearly how the members of the DLC have been working out of the same text book as the Neo Cons.
The Clinton years were good- only because they pushed all the problems forward- Thank Greespan for the Economy, our infrastuctural decay. thank Bill for not de-escalating MIC generated hatred- placing our citizens in harms way because of their ties with the Oppressive M.E 'royals'. thank Hillary for dividing Equal Rights advocates along gender & race lines.
Of course there are those in the Dem party who have not sought the benefits of the DLC- because they have had their own sweet deals with the Corps long before 1984, but aid the DLC in thier covert operations (Levin- In the pocket of the Big 3, thus Oil for decades)
It is time we demand these corporationist out of our gov't- on both sides, and from those who claim to be "3rd parties" (Nadar & Barr are Red herrings)
I'd like Obama to name Hagel as VP and take the legs out from under the corp'ist on both sides
Now that would be Change we can all Believe in. Cheneycorp /ClintonCorp-"Coke & Pepsi" same shit, same Beasts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Some people say.... Posted by: leighsure
Avarice run amok
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 15, 2008 8:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, this is part of deregulation at it's finest! Nice to know that those moneymakers continue to make their money as the rest of us pick up their tab!

Enough is Enough! Wake up!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

J.P. Morgan Chase engineered the downfall of Bear Stearns
Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com on Aug 15, 2008 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who bought Bear Stearns for pennies on the dollar after its collapse?

J.P. Morgan Chase.

All the property owned by Bear Stearns is now owned by J.P. Morgan Chase and they were able to buy it all at an incredible price. The major stockholders of J.P. Morgan Chase are the Morgans and Rockefellers.

Family in those clans engineered the downfall of Bear Stearns in order to acquire vast amounts of wealth for next to nothing.


One of the main purposes of the Federal Reserve banking cartel which the Rockefellers, Morgans, and Rothschilds pushed through in the 30's is to engage in precisely these kinds of demos of other banks, mortgage companies, and investment companies.

It enables the biggest players like J.P. Morgan, Chase (Rockefellers), etc to acquire vast amounts of wealth for next to nothing.

You wonder how the rich keep getting richer, this is how.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nice try.
Posted by: cindyn on Aug 15, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But we already knew Wall Street was scum. Edwards passed himself off as one of the good guys while bullshitting his supporters and contributers and costing Hillary the nomination by splitting the Iowa vote and as Obama's attack poodle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Nice try. Sorry your wrong Posted by: Natasha_W
my ex-husband used to work for Bear
Posted by: deborama on Aug 15, 2008 3:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a TOTALLY corrupt company (but probably just like all the others on Wall Street). They were all doing coke, drinking Johnny Walker Blue, and screwing hookers every chance they got. Oh, that was when they weren't busy stealing money. No morality whatsoever, be it social, sexual, economic, legal, you name it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

$9 Billion
Posted by: zgregz on Aug 15, 2008 11:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Remember the $9 Billion that vanished in Iraq? Ever been in the Army? I don't recall a single time anyone didn't have to sign for ( WHATEVER ). I would bet the Neo-cons have got that cash salted away. Trouble is -- a war zone -- the perfect cover for the biggest heist in history.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]