Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Was the War in Georgia a Neocon Election Ploy?

By Robert Scheer, Truthdig. Posted August 13, 2008.


Yes, it sounds diabolical, but that may be the most accurate way to assess the designs of the McCain campaign in matters of war and peace.
Advertisement

Is it possible that this time the October surprise was tried in August, and that the garbage issue of brave little Georgia struggling for its survival from the grasp of the Russian bear was stoked to influence the U.S. presidential election?

Before you dismiss that possibility, consider the role of one Randy Scheunemann, for four years a paid lobbyist for the Georgian government who ended his official lobbying connection only in March, months after he became Republican presidential candidate John McCain's senior foreign policy adviser.

Previously, Scheunemann was best known as one of the neoconservatives who engineered the war in Iraq when he was a director of the Project for a New American Century. It was Scheunemann who, after working on the McCain 2000 presidential campaign, headed the Committee for the Liberation of Iraq, which championed the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

There are telltale signs that he played a similar role in the recent Georgia flare-up. How else to explain the folly of his close friend and former employer, Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili, in ordering an invasion of the breakaway region of South Ossetia, an invasion that clearly was expected to produce a Russian counterreaction? It is inconceivable that Saakashvili would have triggered this dangerous escalation without some assurance from influential Americans he trusted, like Scheunemann, that the United States would have his back. Scheunemann long guided McCain in these matters, even before he was officially running foreign policy for McCain's presidential campaign.

In 2005, while registered as a paid lobbyist for Georgia, Scheunemann worked with McCain to draft a congressional resolution pushing for Georgia's membership in NATO. A year later, while still on the Georgian payroll, Scheunemann accompanied McCain on a trip to that country, where they met with Saakashvili and supported his bellicose views toward Russia's Vladimir Putin.

Scheunemann is at the center of the neoconservative cabal that has come to dominate the Republican candidate's foreign policy stance in a replay of the run-up to the war against Iraq. These folks are always looking for a foreign enemy on which to base a new Cold War, and with the collapse of Saddam Hussein's regime it was Putin's Russia that came increasingly to fit the bill.

Yes, it sounds diabolical, but that may be the most accurate way to assess the designs of the McCain campaign in matters of war and peace. There is every indication that the candidate's demonization of Russian leader Putin is an even grander plan than the previous use of Saddam to fuel American militarism with the fearsome enemy that it desperately needs.

McCain gets to look tough with a new Cold War to fight while Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama, scrambling to make sense of a more measured foreign policy posture, will seem weak in comparison. Meanwhile, the dire consequences of the Bush legacy that McCain has inherited, from the disaster of Iraq to the economic meltdown, conveniently will be ignored. But the military-industrial complex, which has helped bankroll the neoconservatives, will be provided with an excuse for ramping up a military budget that is already bigger than that of the rest of the world combined.

What is at work here is a neoconservative, self-fulfilling prophecy in which Russia is turned into an enemy that expands its largely reduced military, and Putin is cast as the new Josef Stalin bogeyman, evoking images of the old Soviet Union. McCain has condemned a "revanchist Russia" that should once again be contained. Although Putin has been the enormously popular elected leader of post-Communist Russia, it is assumed that imperialism is always lurking, not only in his DNA but in that of the Russian people.

How convenient to forget that Stalin was a Georgian, and indeed if Russian troops had occupied the threatened Georgian town of Gori they would have found a museum still honoring the local boy, who made good by seizing control of the Russian revolution. Indeed five Russian bombs were allegedly dropped on Gori's Stalin Square on Tuesday.

It should also be mentioned that the post-Communist Georgians have imperial designs on South Ossetia and Abkhazia. What a stark contradiction that the United States, which championed Kosovo's independence from Serbia, now is ignoring Georgia's invasion of its ethnically rebellious provinces.

For McCain to so fervently embrace Scheunemann's neoconservative line of demonizing Russia in the interest of appearing tough during an election campaign is a reminder that a senator can be old and yet wildly irresponsible.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: putin, mccain, georgia, saakashvili, scheunemann

Robert Scheer is the co-author of The Pornography of Power: How Defense Hawks Hijacked 9/11 and Weakened America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Sheeple herded to to the slaughter...
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Aug 13, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hello again all,

This whole Russia-Georgia affair is a purposely-orchestrated and easily-pierced theatrical production. How convenient is it that the Bush Administration trained and prepped Georgia and then (some...) US troops-trainers pull out just before they initiate an "apparent blunder" that the Russians have been ready and poised to respond to, for months. Remember, nothing of this scale can be pulled together quickly, and all sides have been watching each other, like hawks, for decades.

Remember, both sides have satellites and very well equipped spy agencies, so any assertion that anyone was surprised is laughable. It goes without saying that all sides in this strange little war have something up their sleeves that most people have no clues about. All the pieces were placed on the board before major world leaders went off to the Olympics, pretending to be surprised, and pretending to be mad at each other afterwards.

Time to get a clue, before its too late...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Should this prolong even a little, look for crude oil prices to go back up.
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 13, 2008 1:34 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
US plans aid to Georgia as Russia rolls into city

But why should any of this be surprising when the US makes "friends" with the worst regimes of rogue nations such as Israel, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, China, etc ... despite the fact that in all those countries, there's virtually no middle class and the working class or what's left of it is shoved into near-slave labor concentration camps just like animals in factory farms. No wonder

GOD CONTINUES TO SEVERELY PUNISH AMERICA TO ETERNAL DAMNATION !!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George W. -- shrewd or stupid?
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 13, 2008 3:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I saw NBC's rerun snippets of the opening Olympic ceremonies (I'm not watching the live broadcast because of Red China's "Laogai" slave labor system) and there Bush 43 was -- sitting beside Putin and having a jolly good time.

Since the Russian invasion of Georgia was planned BEFORE the games, had Dub-ya secretly approved the pending attack or did Putin snooker our room-temperature IQ, Huff & Puff president?

A little of both, I suspect.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran [For the benefit of first-time AlterNet visitors]
Seven Reasons to Vote Against Unfit McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excuses Excuses
Posted by: QQOblivion on Aug 13, 2008 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The US is now sending in "humanitarian" aid to Georgia. I predict that there is hope among the Bushites that one of those military carriers taking in that aid will be attacked by Russia. Then, ka-boom. The US will have its excuse to get involved militarily.

And, yes, the neocons would LOVE a war between the US and Russia. I must point out that both sides are armed to the sky with nukes. Maybe the nukes won't deter all-out war. Too bad for the civilians of the US and Russia...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BREAKING NEWS FROM CNN!!!
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 13, 2008 3:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Speaking from the Rose Garden today, President Bush threatened to attack Russia if it burned down Atlanta.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OH MY Gosh!!! Posted by: robbie.seal
No, It was finding a way to launch a strike against Iran
Posted by: dayahka on Aug 13, 2008 4:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's plain as the nose on your face that this Georgia business was setting the groundwork for Israel to launch their air strikes against Iran from Georgia. It was also just another in the long series of support given to demonic forces by the US in its search for hegemony. This was a blunder, but blunders seem to roll off George like water off oil--because of a rubber-stamping Congress and a weak citizenry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stupid?
Posted by: dayenta on Aug 13, 2008 4:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't it really stupid to get involved with another "war on terror," or "liberation," or whatever they're calling them these days, when we are so stretched militarily?
Oh, wait...I forgot...they're Republicans...the party of Stupid!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

AHAHAHA
Posted by: ArtemInox on Aug 13, 2008 11:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Excuse me I just pissed my pants, laughing at the stupidity of this article and the comments posted about it.

Would I be surprised if all this were true? Not at all, wouldn't put it past anyone with the power to set it up and carry it out. Am I going to believe this half-baked article with no real facts to back it up? Fuck no.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Utter Hypocrisy
Posted by: andyc on Aug 14, 2008 2:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If it wasn't so serious, I'd be rolling on the floor at the hypocritical drivel coming out of Condi, Maddy Albright, etc. Along the lines of:

"Russia must respect the territorial integrity of its neighboring sovereign states".

"Russia just wants to re-integrate neighboring DEmocracies into its Empire".

These people should really go have a look in the mirror. NO US politician currently has the right to advise anyone else to respect territorial integrity.

And all the MSM story is about poor little Democratic Georgia, oppressed by the evil Rooshians and needing help from the US.

I'm hearing far too little about poor, even littler Ossetia and Abkhazia, treated like trash by the bigger bullying Georgians for decades, and looking forward to a better time as part of the Russian Federation, as demontsrated by neighbors like North Ossetia.

If the Georgians need a few square miles in exchange, why don't the Russians offer them Chechnya? - that's next door, too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

TAKE BARRACK AMERICA !
Posted by: Rosasharn on Aug 14, 2008 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We need to expose McCain for the lying, posturing EVIL he represents. Let this information come to attention of every American: John McCain is trying to hoodwink us, with lots of help from the same old murderous crowd. We don't need another WARMONGER in the White House. We need HONEST, INTELLIGENT and PEACE-LOVING LEADERSHIP. McCain is just another creep who needs layed to rest.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

3 Card Monty: Who knows the 1st card?
Posted by: etisoppa on Aug 15, 2008 2:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
THis was the 1st card. And I see no mention of it here. Are we all using the same internet?


Massive US Naval Armada Heads For Iran



Operation Brimstone ended only one week ago.

This was the joint US/UK/French naval war games

in the Atlantic Ocean preparing for a naval blockade of Iran

and the likely resulting war in the Persian Gulf area.

(continued below)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

There is no mention of this in the media CNN, Fox NBC etc.
No mention of operation Brimstone in the NYT , Uk Telegraph.

Could this all be a internet hoax? Some US disinformation for Iran? Or
disinformation intended to discredit the internet by that newly funded
Internet surveillance unit?

Check the official Navy site. Operation Brimestone did occur ( see
below) but there was no announcement as to the next deployment of the
USS Theodore Roosevelt.

So it is either these reporters of the "main media " are pulling their
large paychecks under false pretenses ( they haven't a clue as to what's
up) or it is as we have suspected and have come to know........
( It is more like the Neo-cons are sneaking/plotting/getting stuff going
"under the radar" just as suspected, and who is helping to facilitate
this..? Yep, them again as usual.

Let us keep the internet up and unregulated where those who want the
real news can find it. ( You can quote the above as a graphic classic
example)


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
(the story: Massive US Naval Armada Heads For Iran)


The massive war games included a

US Navy supercarrier battle group, an

US Navy expeditionary carrier battle group, a

Royal Navy carrier battle group, a

French nuclear hunter-killer submarine plus

a large number of US Navy cruisers, destroyers and frigates

playing the "enemy force". etc. etc.

...>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Below is the official navy story that NYT or Telegraph did not even mention.

I hardly watch Fox CNN NBC ABC etc. Did anyone see it mentioned there?

Read the official story on Operation Brimestone here:
http://www.navy.mil/search/display.asp?story_id=38478

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

OK... I have a question.
Posted by: robbie.seal on Aug 15, 2008 6:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am not trying to be a smart@ss... Which is rare for me.

IF the Bush-Cheney-Neocon conspiracy were so powerful, do you really think they would allow common sheeple to speak out against them?

This article is a farce. Russia has been unhappy about Georgia for a while. They fear the expansion of NATO. Europeans are impotent and the US is tied up in Iraq and Afghanistan. Just like Hungary, Russia will go into Georgia and then the government will change to something more to their liking.

Now... Another question... Where is the outcry on this site? This invasion and soon to be regime change sounds very familiar. Where is the outcry for the poor civilians being slaughtered by Russian imperialism and aggression? After seeing the Soviet behavior in Afghanistan, is there any doubt as to the accusations of atrocities? Where is the outcry?

No. Instead, this author writes a drivel about how this too was engineered by the "Great Neocon Conspiracy". If these boogiemen were so powerful, the Reps wouldn't be worried about Obama winning in NOV. Heck... If they were as powerful as this article suggests... He wouldn't even be running...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Election ploy?
Posted by: Charley2u on Aug 18, 2008 5:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are thinking about the next election...but these guys are thinking 4-5 (and, more) elections into the future.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]