Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Georgia Tries out the Bush War Doctrine, Loses Badly

By Gary Brecher, eXiled Online. Posted August 12, 2008.


The president of tiny Georgia must have caught a case of his pal Bush's war lust to attack a Russian ally and think he'd win.
51zgqaxm6l.ss500
the war nerd
Advertisement

There are two basic facts to keep in mind about the smokin' little war in Ossetia:

1. The Georgians started it.

2. They lost.

If you want to get all serious and actually study up on Ossetia, North and South, and Georgia and the whole eternal gang war that they call the Caucasus, you can check out a column I did on that school-hostage splatter in Beslan, North Ossetia, a few years back.

South Ossetia is a little apple-shaped blob dangling from Russian territory down into Georgia, and most of it has been under control of South Ossetian irregulars backed by Russian "peacekeepers" for the last few years.

The Georgians didn't like that. You don't give up territory in that part of the world, ever. The Georgians have always been fierce people, good fighters, not the forgiving type. In fact, I can't resist a little bit of history here: remember when the Mongols wiped out Baghdad in 1258, the biggest slaughter in any of their conquests? Well, the most enthusiastic choppers and burners in the whole massacre were the Georgian Christian troops in Hulagu Khan's army. They wore out their hacking arms on those Baghdadi civilians. Nobody knows how many people were killed, but it was at least 200,000 -- a pretty big number in the days before antibiotics made life cheap.

So: hard people on every side in that part of the world. No quarter asked or given. No good guys. Especially not the Georgians. They have a rep as good people, one on one, but you don't want to mess with them, and you especially don't want to try to take land from them.

The Georgians bided their time, then went on the offensive, Caucasian style, by pretending to make peace and all the time planning a sneak attack on South Ossetia. They just signed a treaty granting autonomy to South Ossetia this week, and then they attacked. Georgian MLRS units barraged Tskhinvali, the capital city of South Ossetia; Georgian troops swarmed over Ossetian roadblocks; and all in all, it was a great, whiz-bang start, but like Petraeus asked about Iraq way back in 2003, what's the ending to this story? As in: How do you invade territory that the Russians have staked out for protection without thinking about how they'll react?

Georgian President Mikheil Saakashvili just didn't think it through. One reason he overplayed his hand is that he got lucky the last time he had to deal with a breakaway region: Ajara, a tiny little strip of Black Sea coast in southern Georgia. It declared itself an "autonomous" republic, preserving its sacred basket-weaving traditions or whatever. You just have to accept that people in the Caucasus are insane that way; they'd die to keep from saying hello to the people over the next hill, and they're never going to change. The Ajarans aren't even ethnically different from Georgians; they're Georgian too. But they claim difference by being Muslims. And being different means they have to have their own Lego parliament and Tonka-Toy army and all the rest of that crap, and their leader, a wack job named Abashidze, volunteered them to fight to the death for their independence. Except he was such a nut, and so corrupt, and the Ajarans were so similar to the Georgians, and their little "country" was so tiny and ridiculous, that for once sanity prevailed and the Ajarans refused to fight, let themselves get reabsorbed by that Colossus to the North, mighty Georgia.

Well, like I've said before, there's nothing as dangerous as victory. Makes people crazy. Saakashvili started thinking he could gobble up any secessionist region -- like, say, South Ossetia. But there are big differences he was forgetting -- like the fact that South Ossetia isn't Georgian, has a border with Russia, and is linked up with North Ossetia just across that border. The road from Russia to South Ossetia is pretty fragile as a line of supply; it goes through the Roki Tunnel, a mountain tunnel at an altitude of 10,000 feet. I have to wonder why the Georgian air force -- and it's a good one by all accounts -- didn't have as its first mission in the war the total zapping of the South Ossetian exit of that tunnel. Or if you don't trust the flyboys, send in your special forces with a few backpacks full of explosives. There are a lot of ways to cripple a tunnel. Hell, do it low-tech: Drive a fuel truck in there, with a car following, jackknife the truck halfway through with a remote control or timing fuse -- truck driver gets out and strolls to the car, one fast U-turn and you're out and back in Georgia, just in time to see a ball of flame erupt from the tunnel exit. And rebuilding a tunnel way up in the mountains is not an easy or a fast job. Sure, the Russians could resupply by air, but that's a much, much tougher job and would at least slow down the inevitable. Weird, then, that as far as I know the Georgians didn't even try to blast that tunnel. I don't go in for this kind of long-distance micromanaging of warfare, because there's usually a good reason on the ground for tactical decisions; it's the strategic decisions that are really crazy most of the time. But this one I just don't get.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: war, russia, georgia, ossetia

War Nerd by Gary Brecher (Soft Skull, 2008). Read more of his work on eXiled online.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
just a thought
Posted by: Germanicus on Aug 12, 2008 1:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enjoyed the article.

But has it occurred to anyone that it is highly unlikely that our best little ally this side of the Caucasus would have made this strategically disastrous move without a big ol' Texas thumbs up from W? Given that our intelligence services have complete freedom to operate there, they certainly would have been aware that something was up, if not providing direct assistance in the form of satellite intel.

No matter how you look at it, it is pretty damning.

Option 1 is that they were so incompetent that they were unaware that the Georgians were about to invade S. Ossetia and thus unable to dissuade them of the stupidity of the plan, in spite of our massive leverage there.

Option 2 (the likelier of the two) is that they were aware of, and probably abetted, the plan.

Hell, given the extent of the failure, you would almost think that this had come straight out of Rumsfeld's office.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: just a thought Posted by: mclame01
» RE: just a thought Posted by: Libsrule
» RE: just a thought Posted by: mhenriday
» Here's some motivation: Posted by: tommy_slothrop
Hmmmm
Posted by: progdem on Aug 12, 2008 1:57 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would like a way to take this comment that doesn't make it racist filth:

"So: hard people on every side in that part of the world. No quarter asked or given. No good guys. Especially not the Georgians. They have a rep as good people, one on one, but you don't want to mess with them, and you especially don't want to try to take land from them."

Can anyone help me with that?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Hmmmm Posted by: I-I
» RE: Hmmmm Posted by: edgar1
» NPR spouts such filth Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: Hmmmm Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Hmmmm Posted by: Wacre
are you serious?
Posted by: kenhymes on Aug 12, 2008 3:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"that school hostage splatter?" This is why editors are still a good thing. Those were real people, real children, real families still grieving. Grow the fuck up, then come back and tell us what you may or may not know about international politics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Irony/Hyperbole Posted by: edgar1
» RE: are you serious? Posted by: John Annis
Loved the article
Posted by: rhinojos on Aug 12, 2008 3:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You wouldn't know who the real bad guys were in this little gem of a little war, by the way the media mouthpieces are playing this up. The little bastards!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Loved the article Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
Good Article On a Complex Affair
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Aug 12, 2008 3:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is more to the story, however.

Most people that follow the area know that the "President" stooge of Georgia was bankrolled into office by Obama "advisor" George Soros and enabled by Zbignew Brzezinski among other western ruling class flunkies and spooks. A real Fascist puppet show.

Take a look-see at "War of Lies - Russia Moves In"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh, the tangle webs we weave... Posted by: OldRedleg
» On Tangled Webs "we" Weave... Posted by: Mister_PsyOps
» For Low-Information Poster: Posted by: TruthBeTold
» For Low-Information Commenter: Posted by: OrwellMan
straighten that map!
Posted by: ebmeyer6w on Aug 12, 2008 4:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think I finally understand what's going on. It sounds like what an old college teacher called "mapitis," the urge that national leaders feel to straighten borders and make things look neater on the map. Georgia got a bad case of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Maps are odd things. Posted by: andabottleof_rum
Set up and knock down by the Zio-cons!
Posted by: williameon on Aug 12, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Install a Puppet
Start a War
Absorb the Country
Zio-cons win again.
Look surprised!
One Fat Goat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A bit flippant, but.....
Posted by: xi_people on Aug 12, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author does accurately summarize the situation, though some of the language and terms should have been cleaned up.

The only real issue now is how the US will respond to the up-coming Russian takeover of the oil pipeline (which pumps roughly a million barrels a day) running through Georgia. By doing so, Russia will have a virtual monopoly on the energy resources used by Europe.

US influence is slip-sliding away in so many ways.... Will the response be to confront Russia directly? That would, in all likelihood, involve nuclear weapons. Are we looking at the global endgame here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A bit flippant, but..... Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» US influence slip-sliding away Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: A bit flippant, but..... Posted by: Scientz
Standard Ops
Posted by: Last Chance on Aug 12, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In order for war contractors to stay in business they must occasionally set their politicians to arranging a war, like in Iraq and Georgia; and in order for allied political bosses to stay on top they must occasionally set their soldiers to whacking each other to stay in practice and keep their robber barons fat cats happy, otherwise, the people might think they don't need their help and protection (!)

Logically, all communities should have local autonomy, but wanna-be war lords stir up ethnic hatred so they can have fun killing their "enemies" and parade their big prick egos for their submissive women to admire.

So where is the dis-United Nations's Wimpy Moon, pussy-footing around as usual, useless bureaucrat that he is?

Meanwhile, like Stalin, another little man with big ambitions is busy trying to rebuild the Russian Empire.

Mankind is an insane species and dick-headed for self-extinction.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» No question about it, Posted by: Lloyd Drako
Remember when
Posted by: solrev on Aug 12, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A Pentagon spokesperson called Russia's response "disproportionate."
Remember when the world called Israel’s response "disproportionate", and the Bush babies said oh no.
Remember the Gulf of Tonkin incident, if you believe that Georgia was stupid enough to attack Russia with them sitting on Georgia’s border with heavy armor, I will give you this bridge I have in London. Thank God the rest of NATO was smart enough to send Georgia and the Bush babies packing. I guess the war on terror was wearing thin, the Bush babies had to create some fear in the American people and give them someone else to hate for awhile. Who better than the Russian nukes for getting the Americans mind off the economy before the election? The politics of death just keeps rolling along.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: emember when Posted by: Dboy
smarmy tone about civilian deaths? no thanks
Posted by: cafesombra on Aug 12, 2008 5:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author's tone in this article drips so much ego and uncaring sarcasm in the first few lines, I decided for real news and responsible journalism about the situation in Georgia, I should turn to the New York Times. Who would have thought someone would have to turn to the Times in order to find a bit of compassion?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dictator Bush Syndrome
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 12, 2008 6:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yup, no doubt about it. Dictator Bush Syndrome has spread. What were they thinking?

JT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Selling the Russians short
Posted by: OldRedleg on Aug 12, 2008 6:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem with blogs like yours is that too often you mix in a number of real factoids with just a bit too much personal opinion, and then manage to pass it off as real reporting.

You are probably right that the Georgians didn't expect the Russians to react to their little misadventure, or in the manner that they did, and the U.S. at least tacitly approved or ignored what they (the Georgians) were about to do.

However, you completely failed to mention that the Russians were quite obviously prepared, and probably hoping, the the Georgians would do something so foolish. The sheer weight and speed of the Russian response makes it quite evident that they were long prepared for such an event, perhaps even helped it to happen, and once again, our intelligence agencies failed to anticipate the entire scenario.

The Russians are not really as unpredictable as you opine. Just like every other country, ethnic group, or political entity, they will react in the manner that their powers to be deem most advantageous to them at the moment. Sometimes it is an immediate reaction based on sheer emotion or lack thereof, or it may be a highly calculated reaction based on events that may have been building for a period of time and could affect the near and/or long time future. The U.S. reaction to Iraq's invasion of Kuwait is a classic example of both.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Prepared Russians? Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: Prepared Russians? Posted by: OldRedleg
» RE: Prepared Russians? Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Prepared Russians? Posted by: patfr
» RE: Prepared Russians? Posted by: Quannah
» Chechnyan comparison Posted by: IntnsRed
» RE: Chechnyan comparison Posted by: patfr
» RE: Chechnyan comparison Posted by: OldRedleg
» RE: Selling the Russians short Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
Reward
Posted by: uncleeddie on Aug 12, 2008 6:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's the reward for the willing. First your military grows by 30 times, then you get to take on the Russians again to help your Neo Con western friends, then you get to DIE. Congratulations idiots.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Georgia's most famous native son--Joe Stalin
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 12, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just wanted to mention that Georgia has a pretty-well known native son. He was called Joseph Stalin.

But a great article with good insight on the history of the region.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Russia
Posted by: Ryan on Aug 12, 2008 6:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Already had that power: it can control the flow of oil to Europe without to bother about Georgie

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Russia Posted by: Lloyd Drako
Georgia's most famous native son--Joe Stalin
Posted by: zooeyhall on Aug 12, 2008 6:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just wanted to mention that Georgia has a pretty-well known native son. Maybe you've heard of him. His name was Joseph Stalin.

However, a great article that gives good insight to the history of the region. Thank you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mac's ready
Posted by: QCao009 on Aug 12, 2008 7:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How do the MSP and Alternet miss Ready on Day 1, Experienced McBush's haranguing Russia-bashing? What is he gonna do? Attack Russia with the Sturgis Harley dudes ?

Mac must have been smoking too much gasoline fume that day !!! What a pandering idiot !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cruel Wars
Posted by: ceti on Aug 12, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The factoid about Georgia's role in the sack of Baghdad is interesting. 700 years later, Georgia and Mongolia send troops to join the "Coalition of the Willing" to sack Iraq all over again in another cruel war.

If you want more flippant, you got Arnold in Red Heat: Arnold takes on the Georgians

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ABOUT THE AUTHOR
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 12, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So he did some reaseach and provided some info. That's what reporters do. Bravo. Where on earth did he find his obnoxious attitude. A war ought to be taken more seriously no matter where it is. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Irony Posted by: edgar1
» RE: Irony Posted by: helenwheels
» I totally agree Posted by: fanny666
ICE ICE Baby tells the entire story of how Oil caused these deaths..!
Posted by: TJColatrella on Aug 12, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The criminal manipulation of Oil on the Commodities and Futures Market contributed to these deaths and bloodshed and this conflict..and there will be others to come because of the deregulation and lack of any oversight and enforcement of these markets..

All this thanks to the Republican party...which now whines about drilling as if that would address the meteoric rise in Oil and Gas prices destroying our economy and destabilizing the world..!

These inflated artificial prices have emboldened and enriched Russia greatly underwriting this escapade on the part of the Russians, but also instigating along with our administration and or their lobbyists and Oil Futures traders to do this on the part of Georgia attacking South Ossetia..!

Go to Ice Ice Baby the Star Telegram May of 2008 by Ed Wallace it is the best article a 2 part series on the manipulation and deregulation of the Oil and Commodities Market..!

Here's the URLs

http://www.star-telegram.com/ed_wallace/story/651928

Part II

http://www.star-telegram.com/ed-wallace/story/659081

This is the best most detailed article I have yet found on these out of control markets..in the clutches of criminals such as those at Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley..as well as the ICE market and in Dubai..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

our oil-thirsty military
Posted by: WolfieSense on Aug 12, 2008 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
perfect little storm concocted! Cheney was having a hard time finding real estate around the Caspian to set another US military base. Luring the Georgian mafiosos and egging them on was perfect! the DoD can't afford to let LUKOIL or the Chinese control that oil spigot!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: our oil-thirsty military Posted by: EncinoM
Better Get Used to it!
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 12, 2008 9:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like this conflict in that:

The US was not invovled in it! Our military is used to going everything to help quell fighting. But we did not go and the conflict was resolved by those who could actually resolve it, thank god we couldnt do anything about it.

Reasons:
- Georgia is helping us in Iraq, so we cant fight them.
- Russia is a superpower so to fight them would be insanity
- Our military is over-extended so even if we wanted to it would hurt us more so than help us.

All of this makes US Involvement null and void, for once, so get used to it America! Let this be proof that peace can still come about even without US fighting.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Georgia On My Mind
Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com on Aug 12, 2008 9:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well Georgia's in the news again, but for the wrong reasons. Here during the Olympics, while the world cheers its athletes we're sidetracked by a pro-American proxy, Georgia, invading a tiny speck of earth called South Ossetia, and for what? Oil? Revenge?
I just heard it on TV, MSNBC, tells us. Ja, folks, oil is involved. A major oil pipeline (British Petroleum) was closed due to the violence in that mountainous republic.
So there you have it. OIL! Many of us could care less about South Ossetia. The (American) press is making Russia look like the bad guy. It's like we've reverted back to anti-Soviet rhetoric from the 50s, telling Russia to get out.
Just what it is our role in this flareup? Our response? We can't do much. The Bush camp can only sit back and wonder what to do about Iraq and Afghanistan. Rice, McCain, et al. all have said lots of jive but can't do a thing.
We're the last ones to talk about invading a sovereign nation. We're still in Iraq and they would like a cease fire, do you think, Bush?
One option is out: there is no way we're sending in the Marines to "defend" Georgia. The Georgian army already threw in the towel. Oh, yes, they underestimated Russia and I side with Russia on this one. Georgia will think twice before undertaking anymore military expeditions.
If this was a wrestling tag team match, the United States will not make a tag to relieve their little pal from taking a beating.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Fact Check Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: Fact Check Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Fact Check Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: To make it clearer to readers: Posted by: penobscotdziekuje@yahoo.com
» RE: Fact Check Posted by: EncinoM
Never believe the West
Posted by: Hans B on Aug 12, 2008 9:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wonderful article, though I can well imagine people getting pissed at its overly ironic phrasing. But I would argue that it's not just the Bush doctrine, and it's not just primitive local passion either. East Europeans have a disconcerting way of believing the promises made to them by the West, despite a near 100% record of betrayal.

France and the UK allying themselves with Poland, then standing by as the Nazis and Soviets divide up the country in 1939.

The Dutch promising Bosnian refugees that they'd be safe in Srebrenica.

Bill Clinton promising the Russians that if they'd accept NATO membership of former Warsaw-Pact countries like Poland, NATO would refrain from expanding into parts of the former Soviet Union.

George Bush pushing for NATO membership of Georgia and promising the Georgians who-knows-what in exchange for them joining the "coalition of the dwindling" in Iraq.

Advice to East Europeans: don't ever base your policies on assurances given to you by the West. Those assurances aren't worth the paper they're printed on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

disproportionate=illegal, doofus
Posted by: leafsong1 on Aug 12, 2008 9:30 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's what the Pentagon was saying, that the Russians were committing aggressive war. Apparently, the author thinks of the US invasion of Iraq as a legitimate use of force. Consequently, the irony of a war criminal decrying war crimes was lost on him. He says the Georgians invaded, which is only arguably true since they sent troops into a part (arguably) of their own country, but it would be more accurate to say that their defensive action against Russian covert activities was disproportionate, and so, illegal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Russia Drills For Oil While America Sleeps
Posted by: theVRWCwhodatesLiberals on Aug 12, 2008 9:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However the left is busy being snarky... great! Well thanks for nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» TROLLwhodateshimself Posted by: leighsure
Another Vatican directed smokescreen for the gullible...
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Aug 12, 2008 10:40 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This whole affair is a purposely orchestrated theatrical production. How convenient is it that the Bush Administration trained and prepped Georgia and then US trainers pull out just before they initiate an apparent blunder that the Russians have been ready and poised to respond to, for months. It goes without saying that all sides in this strange little war have something up their sleeves that most people have no clues about. All the pieces were placed on the board before major world leaders went off to the Olympics, pretending to be surprised, and pretending to be mad at one another afterwards.

It is amazing how easily duped the sheeple of this world are. Keep them stupid and enslaved to money and they are easily herded to the slaughter. The poor people of Georgia and the soldiers on all sides of this and other conflicts are mere pawns to the whims of those slithering in the shadows. This little production has been planned for some time to coincide with the Olympics, but that was such a poor cover that it should be obvious that something else is afoot. And how convenient is it that the Olympics are on 8/8/08?

The timing of 8/8/08 links this to the same gang that pulled off 9/11 (and many other events) with its blatantly obvious numerology. Contemplate Machiavelli and Mystery Babylon, since they both point to the same gang of liars.

Time to get a clue and help stop this gang of evil halfwits, before its too late...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wow
Posted by: HomelandColors on Aug 12, 2008 11:43 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is the most obnoxious article I’ve read in quite some time. I'm glad you know the history of the region but your analysis reeks of self satisfaction. Russia has dismantled its own democracy and is now trying to dismantle Georgia's. Just because Bush is a jerk who got along with Georgia doesn't mean the small country deserves to become a vassal of Putin's Russia. If you have been paying attention you know how hard they have worked to become a Democratic nation and your writing shows a contempt for those efforts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: wow Posted by: bvconway
» RE: wow Posted by: bcgirl125