Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

John Edwards' Ken Doll Lust

By Gail Collins, The New York Times. Posted August 9, 2008.


Edwards blames "an egotism, a narcissism that leads you to believe that you can do whatever you want." We could have figured that ourselves.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Nobel Laureate Slams the Bible, Calls It "A Catalogue of Cruelties"
Mario de Queiroz

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Gail Collins

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

When it comes to politicians and sex, our expectations are not all that great. Human nature being what it is, there will continue to be adultery no matter how many instructive scandals they're exposed to. But you really would think that by now they'd know how to make a decent public confession.

Yet there was John Edwards, ignoring the many, many previous examples of why it is so important to admit the truth quickly and keep it simple. Unable to deny any longer that he had had an affair with a campaign worker, he insisted on parsing. It was all a mistake. If she was paid off, it wasn't my money.

And, in what may be a new high in the annals of weaseldom: my wife's cancer was in remission.

As to why he did it, Edwards blamed "an egotism, a narcissism that leads you to believe that you can do whatever you want." That we could have figured out on our own.

For a man bent on clearing things up, Edwards seemed strangely incurious during his interview on Nightline on ABC. He had no idea why his national finance chairman has been funneling payments to his ex-mistress, and he was apparently never tempted to pick up the phone to ask. His 2 a.m. visit with the woman, Rielle Hunter, at a Beverly Hills hotel last month was a secret mission to keep her from going public about their liaison, the briefness and meaninglessness of which cannot be stressed too often. And he has no idea what baby that was in The National Enquirer picture.

Edwards met Hunter in a bar in New York in 2006, and paid her $114,000 to follow him around, documenting his every move for campaign videos. (In a TV interview back in happier times, Hunter called the experience "life-altering.") Said videos were posted, then mysteriously disappeared from the Edwards Web site, with officials muttering something about campaign finance rules. They exist today on YouTube, where you can see the candidate sitting on his plane, grinning like a hound dog in heat, while he tells Hunter that he doesn't want to be "some plastic Ken doll that you put in front of the audience," and pokes himself in the chest while announcing, "I actually want the country to see who I am -- who I truly am."

When The National Enquirer ran a story that Hunter was pregnant and named Edwards as the father, he denied that there had been any relationship. One of his campaign workers stepped up and took responsibility for the baby. But when the little girl was born, Hunter did not list any father on the birth certificate.

All this is weirdly reminiscent of the saga of Grover Cleveland, my favorite American president when it comes to sex scandals. He had barely been nominated in 1884 when a small, scurrilous newspaper from his hometown of Buffalo accused him of being the father of a love child born to Maria Halpin, a store clerk. She later took to drink, and Cleveland, a bachelor, arranged to have the baby adopted by friends.

"Moral Monster," said my favorite headline, in The Cincinnati Penny Post. "Grover Cleveland's True Character Laid Bare. A Boon Companion to Buffalo Harlots. A Drunken, Fighting, Roistering Rou." The scandal almost cost him the election, and the baby inspired a famous political slogan: Ma, Ma, where's my Pa? Gone to the White House, ha, ha, ha.

It probably wasn't Cleveland's child. The birth certificate lists the baby's name as Oscar Folsom Cleveland, and Oscar Folsom was Cleveland's married law partner, who had been killed in an accident before the birth. But Cleveland stolidly refused to defend himself and Folsom's name was never really connected to the scandal. Then, once he was safely in the White House, the new president married Folsom's beautiful 21-year-old daughter, Frances.

This is as good as it gets for sex scandal survivors. The marriage was happy and Cleveland wound up serving two terms. The American public has always had an extremely pragmatic attitude toward their elected officials and will overlook almost anything if they believe the sinning pol can deliver on the job.

If Edwards's political career is toast, it will be because he has always seemed to be less than a sum of his parts: the position papers, the "Two Americas," the photogenic grin, the supersmart wife. The only piece of the package that consistently disappointed was the man himself. He wasn't a very good running mate for John Kerry, and as a presidential candidate, he always struck me as being about 2 inches deep.

We take whatever lessons we can get from these sad public messes. We will marvel, yet again, at how much less damage would have been done if the offender had taken the inventive tactic of not lying. But on one front, at least, human behavior really does seem to be evolving. Edwards told his wife that she didn't need to sit loyally by his side while the TV cameras rolled.

© 2008 The New York Times

AlterNet is making this New York Times material available in accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107: This article is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: john edwards, infidelity, affair, rielle hunter

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The way I prevented the problem occurring in the first place
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 9, 2008 11:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Was to never be apart from my wife for over 24 hours for over 20 years.

This was sometimes incredibly difficult - because of course my job sometimes meant I had to work away or go on training courses many miles away.

But I always worked out the distances in advance - and sometimes it meant flying.

But I always got home sometimes as late as 1:00 am and had to get up at 6:00 am to return.

But I really love my wife - and I realise I am a human being and understand what happens to other people.

We kept this up for well over 20 years - then my wife had to spend some time away looking after her very elderly Mum and Dad when they were ill.

I mean - I love my wife so much I couldn't possibly betray her - but am not so stupid to realise what would happen if we were seperated for a considerable length of time.

I don't expect anyone else to do the same.

I was a very naughty boy for several years before I met my wife.

We should be talking about more serious things

What's happenning in Georgia now?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is a repeat of the comment about Edwards I made today on another thread.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 9, 2008 11:37 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I wrote off Pretty Boy Edwards as a narcissistic empty suit after learning about his $400 haircut.

Unfit McCain is cut from the same egotistical cloth. A foul-mouthed womanizer with a Napoleon complex and room-temperature IQ, he cheated on his first wife after she had spent nearly every waking hour during the Vietnam War helping other POW wives to cope with their captured husbands' misfortune.

So how did Unfit McCain show tribute to her patriotism? By sporting a hard-on in Hawaii and hosing Cindy while his real wife was at home, recovering from a near-fatal car accident.

A "man" like that should never EVER become America's commander-in-chief.

With love,

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran [For the benefit of first-time AlterNet visitors]
Seven Reasons to Vote Against Unfit McCain

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Monica a predator? Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Monica a predator? Posted by: weenie
» RE: Monica a predator? Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Monica a predator? Posted by: lenioui
» So what's your point Lionheart? Posted by: foreverhope
Edwards is pretty lame
Posted by: droscify on Aug 9, 2008 11:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
its always hard to speak for the working class when you've never been part of it yourself anyway. I've long thought edwards was a bloviating loser.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Edwards is pretty lame Posted by: CatDad
» RE: dwards is pretty lame Posted by: lenioui
» Wrong.... Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Wrong.... Posted by: lenioui
» RE: dwards is pretty lame Posted by: BlueSun
» RE: dwards is pretty lame Posted by: lenioui
In the UK - If it was revealed a politician was having affairs it would enhance his prospects
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 9, 2008 12:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
providing the boys were pretty

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» LOL! Posted by: foreverhope
Personally, I always thought John Edwards Was One of America's Most Impressive Politicians
Posted by: opmoc on Aug 9, 2008 12:33 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
However Dennis Kucinich is Streets Ahead of The Lot Of Them

Yes I know he is little

But so what he has got more courage than the rest of them put together to do and say what needs to be done and said

I realise the game of politics has always been a snake infested pit of corruption and depravity

But Dennis Kucinich shines out like a Beacon of Integrity and Honesty

I also realise that the reason he has been almost completely snuffed out by the media circus of control is that they haven't "got" anything on him.

The way the system works - is that you only get to high positions within the circus - if they have got something on you to control what you do

If you don't conform - they used to just assassinate you

Now that is becoming slightly obvious

So they jut do ou by publicising the fact that ou have been a naughty boy

For Fucks Sake

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» PLEASE........ Posted by: LionHeart
I'm angry
Posted by: optimist on Aug 9, 2008 12:54 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really really liked Edwards. I was disappointed when he dropped out of the primaries. I liked his platform - it was the most progressive of any of the candidates. I thought his anti-corporate stance was heroic! I bought his BS hook line and sinker - and now I am truly disappointed in the man. How difficult is it to keep your damn pants on dudes?? You say you want to change America, you have this amazing mission to fulfill. But a piece of ass is more important?

Idiot.

I guess the answer is that most (not all - fingers crossed) politicians that make it this far are egomaniacs of the first order. It becomes all about them - the rest of us be damned.

Jackass.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I'm angry - me too Posted by: Moira61
» RE: People are not selfless Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: I'm angry Posted by: rad6
My Illusions Washed Away
Posted by: mishawaka on Aug 9, 2008 12:59 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I really believed in John Edwards. In many ways, I still do. He is right on labor, right on poverty, right on healthcare and right on middle class issues. He was my second choice in 2004 and when he announced that he was running in 2006, I was there. I went to Iowa three times. Once to see his announcement speech in Des Moines, once for a town hall meeting in Davenport and, the last time, to go door to door over New Year's Eve/Day around Mason City.

I was sick when he dropped out of the race, but I am more sick now. For a while I held out hope that he would be named Obama's running mate, but I more realistically hoped he would be nominated for attorney general. Now he could not run for dog catcher in Chapel Hill. He cheated on his wife while she was in remission?!? He is done.

Perhaps what makes me the sickest isn't the way that the Enquirer is strutting around like they just won the Pulitzer, and it's not the way that guys like Newt Gingrich (who practically divorced his wife while she was in bed in a cancer ward) are loving this, it's the sickening feeling you get when you really believed in someone, really fought for them, and then they do something like this.

Elizabeth has forgiven him, and so has his family. It may take me a while.

"All the heroes and legends I knew as a child have fallen to idols of clay..." -Dennis DeYoung

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Illusions Washed Away Posted by: CatDad
» RE: Illusions Washed Away Posted by: mishawaka
» dream on... Posted by: Moira61
» RE: Illusions Washed Away Posted by: GuitarBill
At last Edwards exposed for the false, lying deceitful hypocrite he always was
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist on Aug 9, 2008 1:55 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let us hope that the next populist exposed for their lies and deceit is faux populists Dennis Kuchinich and Ralph Nader.

1 down 2 to go, I love it!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrat vs. Republican affairs
Posted by: kiel on Aug 9, 2008 2:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Democrats have them, they stay with their spouses, working through the trouble and saving their marriages. (Kennedy, Edwards, Clinton, Spitzer, etc.)

When Republicans have them, they divorce and marry their mistresses. (Gingrich, McCain, Reagan, etc.)

Remind me. Which is the "family values" party again?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Robert Lewis
Posted by: reunionpi on Aug 9, 2008 2:25 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Andrew Young of the John Edwards story: The arrests for worthless checks, DWI, burglary, criminal mischief, the federal tax lien

webofdeception.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do you think we could all please remember
Posted by: badkitty on Aug 9, 2008 5:21 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you think we could all please remember that the sex lives of other adults with consulting adults is not a mature adult's business? Let's leave Clinton, Edwards, Gingrich, McCain, etc. alone. Larry Craig is a different matter, given that he was soliciting in a public place where young boys might be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I wish none of us knew about this
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on Aug 9, 2008 5:30 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of us are aware of the dynamics occurring in the Edwards marriage, the Clinton marriage or whatever others. And it's none of our business. That being said, I'm always super-thrilled when moralistic Republicans get outed as being philanderers, especially gay ones.

I considered supporting Edwards in the primaries before he dropped out, and even if this had come out earlier, I still would have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Canada, Take Me AWAY
Posted by: Gravitas on Aug 9, 2008 5:43 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why couldn't I have been born in a place like France or Greece where they are more sophisticated about these things and don't bat an eye. So I wouldn't have to tear my hair out reading crap like this on the front page of every newspaper while so many pressing issues go ignored in MSM. If there are any Canadian business owners out there who could offer me a job, please, I am begging.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Must Say This...
Posted by: mishawaka on Aug 9, 2008 9:03 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you are going to cheat on your wife, if your wife is sick with cancer (even in remission), if you are a high profile figure, if you are running for President, if you are going to get involved with a campaign staffer...

Couldn't you pick a more attractive woman? Even the photos I have seen of Edwards' mistress that weren't taken "ambush style" by the "Enquirer" make her look haggard and rough. I mean, if you are going to take the chance of losing your marriage, of being publicly humiliated, why this woman? What was it about her? Why not a twenty-something intern or a volunteer?

Even with Bill Clinton I wondered: why Paula Jones?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I Must Say This... Posted by: CatDad
» Hugh Grant and Eddie Murphy Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: I Must Say This... Posted by: foreverhope
» It's Not That Simple Posted by: Libertine
Jimmy Carter
Posted by: foreverhope on Aug 9, 2008 9:42 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Was the last decent, truly honorable president this country has had, it has been downhill ever since. Because of the Iranian hostage crisis and economic woes, his has been considered a 'failed' presidency. But whatever, he is a better man by far than Reagan ever was no matter what anyone else says. He took his job as president and his honor very seriously. I remember when he made a disclosure that his even THINKING of being with any other woman besides Rosalind was 'cheating in his heart' or something like that. Very dear and why is that sort of integrity and character too much to expect in our presidents? Seems like being faithful and protecting family AND country should be at the top of any president's list and if not why should we trust them with anything else? This is not a D or R issue, it is absolutely bi-partisan. They get paid (quite a lot) to govern and and do the People's business, the White House is NOT the playboy mansion! ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Jimmy Carter Posted by: CatDad
smoke screen
Posted by: logic on Aug 10, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
what is not being reported while everyone's busy watching this drivel????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: smoke screen Posted by: VZEQICVA
Get out of the bedroom and stick to the FACTS! MILLIONS died, whats more inportant?
Posted by: williameon on Aug 10, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Blah, Blah, Blah!
The highly virtue-alistic, overly moralist people stick their nose up your a-s and pull out a Red Herring!
Divert attention from anything important especially what they are doing.
Destroying America and subjugating the world.
It is all over here.
It is so far gone that there is nothing left.
What are we going to do about it?
Get real.
Get out of the gutter and start building.
We've got important work to do.
The Delusion will end when we end it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Politics, Power and Sex
Posted by: Southern Gal on Aug 10, 2008 8:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Men or women in power, who control the lives of others, have always been sexy. I think that we as a country spend too much time worrying about other people's sex lives. Having said that, when you run for political office, you have to know that skeletons don't stay in the closet, that someone will find out and that the press will jump on sensational news. Maybe that's one reason more good people don't run for political office. Too few people are without sin or transgressions and no one (except the idiots that appear on shows like Jerry Springer) wants to see their personal laundry aired in public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

PRUDES
Posted by: sirios on Aug 10, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To all of you hypocritical prudes that think you are above edwards, clinton, etc. and have NEVER entertained for a moment the thought of fucking another woman besides your wife. You are lying or so repressed that the only way you can feel alive is by criticizing others. Mind your own PATHETIC business! Can't wait to hear the vehement retorts from all of the brainwashed repressed religious freaks, in the vein of "it shows a lack of character" or look how spiritually pure i am because i blindly follow all the rules. you only follow the rules because you're terrified of being rejected in heaven and ending up in hell. Perhaps you're not paying attention, if this planet is'nt hell then what is?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: PRUDES Posted by: foreverhope
America's Schizophrenic Attitude Toward Sex
Posted by: Libertine on Aug 10, 2008 9:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the wake of the news about John Edwards having an extramarital liaison, the reaction has been entirely predictable. People on both sides of the political aisle have responded with moralistic indignation about his fall from the monogamy bandwagon. "Shocked", "stunned", "disappointed", "appalled" and other similar words have been some adjectives people have used to express their feelings about this incident. I use the word feelings rather than opinions purposely, as most of the sentiments I've read are based largely on emotion and not objective reason.

Republicans reacting to the news have taken a "see, I told you so" attitude and former Democratic supporters have denounced their support of Edwards, with both saying he's unfit to be President, precisely because he engaged in extramarital sex.

Oh, please. Spare me the self-righteous indignation.

For one thing, his marriage is a private relationship. He's not accountable to the public for his conduct within his marriage. I've read comments from people who say they can't "forgive" him. Excuse me? John Edwards doesn't need any forgiveness from strangers who are not married to him. The only person he owes an explanation to is his wife. The rest of us need to butt out and tend to our own relationships.

Second, we don't elect presidents to uphold the sacred cow of monogamy. The idea that monogamous marriage is a moral issue, rather than simply a practical arrangement, comes largely from religion. Indeed, we have no religious tests for office and the separation of church and state is still in effect.

Third, his infidelity doesn't affect his fitness to lead the country. Before Obama became the Democratic nominee, I supported Edwards -- and I'd still vote for him. He had good ideas about labor, fighting poverty, healthcare, among other things. The fact that he had a friend with benefits outside his marriage doesn't suddenly turn his good ideas into bad ones.

Americans have a schizophrenic relationship with sex. On one hand, our media bombards us constantly with images of sex. In practice, we are a fairly hedonistic nation. Statistics show a sizable percentage of men and women have engaged in extramarital sex at least once. Yet, our reactions to politicians and other celebrities who are caught being human take a decidedly moralistic and hypocritical streak that betrays that our Puritan origins are still alive in well in 21st century America.

The Europeans have the right idea when it comes to issues of this nature. For the most part, Europeans are realistic and practical about the private lives of their politicians, recognizing human nature for what it is and do not expect their leaders to be saints. As long as a leader is otherwise competent, his private life is his own business.

In history, many leaders, great and not-so-great according to one's opinion, have not been strictly monogamous: Washington, Roosevelt, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Reagan, Clinton, to name just a few. Would our country have been better off if their service had been refused simply for marital infidelity? I think not.

Edwards' only mistake in regards to responding to the public was to lie about it, though it is quite understandable considering how American society tends to respond to such incidents. He should have learned something from Bill Clinton's experience and realize that he was only digging himself in deeper. I think he should have told reporters that it was a private matter between him and Mrs Edwards.

Jesus Christ isn't running for president, nor will he ever. People should give up the bizarre notion that a politician needs to be a saint in order to effectively lead a country. We need to accept that anyone running for president will be human -- and that humans, with all their imperfections are nonetheless capable of being good leaders.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm disappointed the campaign worker wasn't a guy
Posted by: rclord on Aug 10, 2008 4:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats' sex scandals are so boring. Why can't they be more like Republicans, and cruise in public restrooms and exchange pornographic instant messages with teenagers of the same sex? Republicans are so much wilder and funnier.

If the media really needs to make such a big deal out of sex scandals, it can at least try to entertain the public a little bit!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sex crime??
Posted by: cbishopp on Aug 10, 2008 5:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this is all very funny because a man and his beliefs are often snubbed once it's discovered that he is a dirt bag. Or is it?
Here are a few names for discussion since 1980...David Vitter, Mark Foley, Bob Livingston, Jack Ryan, Gary Condit, Bob Packwood, Gary Hart, Barney Frank, Eliot Spitzer, Larry Craig, Jim McGreevey, Mel Reynolds, Chuck Robb, Barney Frank, Brock Adams, Dan Crane, Gerry Studds, Robert Bauman, and of course the great Bill Clinton.
Some of these careers ended in shame and others flourished unabated.
Straight or homosexual, married or single, these little "mishaps" are the result of a skewed personality and the job that it requires.
Who wants to be president?? Who wants to open their lives to such scrutiny and never have a moments peace in public? Who wants their family and private life to be totally sacrificed and to have their identity reduced to a parade of quick, easy to understand slogans?
Certainly not an egomaniac who is surrounded by sycophantic slobs who expect to profit by association.
There are more important things to be alarmed about in this great sea of human imperfection and considering the laundry list of crimes this administration has produced I say we focus on some of the other commandments like though shalt not murder or though shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor or though shalt not steal. Whether a politician sleeps around or screws page boys has little effect on me directly, it's the legislation that they produce that I am concerned about most.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I've Been Disappointed By Edwards For Years
Posted by: gradioc on Aug 10, 2008 6:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Lots of people who supported Edwards and worked hard for him are disappointed now. Welcome to the club. I worked hard for him in his 1998 Senate run in NC. I became disillusioned when he abandoned all thought of representing the state that had elected him and turned all his enormous energy to running for President. This happened, near as I can tell, about three minutes after he was sworn into the Senate. His last minute decision to not defend his Senate seat in 1994 left NC Democrats in disarray and delivered the seat to rising GOP star Richard Burr. It's not clear he, or a replacement, could have beaten Burr anyway, but his basing everything on his national aspirations left an open path to the Senate for Burr. I'm a Democrat. I don't expect, or respect, slavish devotion to party, but just a little consideration would have been nice. All politicians must have a healthy ego, but John Edwards stands out, even among that set.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Even better than an honest reply would be...
Posted by: www.suekatz.com on Aug 11, 2008 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a principled response that these are private matters, nobody's business but the people personally touched by the betrayal. All these calls now for dna testing - as a savvy friend of mine asks: "In whose interest?" Does such info serve a public need - other than that of selling newspapers?

Once the religious right is allowed to set the terms of discourse, and especially once the Democrats collaborate in this crap about "morals," then piling into the country's bedrooms becomes a legitimate action. And that's always a very bad idea.

Sue

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WHO CARES??
Posted by: fanny666 on Aug 11, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Grow up, America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ABOUT MRS. EDWARDS
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 11, 2008 1:14 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This affair happened 2 yrs. ago and Apparently John & Elizabeth got past it. So NEITHER of them brought it up during the campaign. It was history. Isn't it possible that she wanted the White House as much as he did? First Lady is a very prestigious and enviable position. I'm not sure that all this sympathy and pity is what she wants. She's still with John and that is what she wants. This is all an intrusion into their lives and quite boring. ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mythology
Posted by: Ahimsa on Aug 11, 2008 9:52 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
American mythology has it, that when a man is unfaithful in his marriage, he is single, or simply is a horny dude, he is incapacitated to govern. Yeah, sex makes you dirty, doesn't it?
I have never heard such silly thing anywhere else...
C'mon people, quit whining about WHO your politicians are doing and concentrate on WHAT they are doing to YOU and your children!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

bklyn
Posted by: bklyn on Aug 12, 2008 10:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What a shame, really. The cheating is bad but the lying is worse. He wasn't even man enough to admit it. He can make all the excuses in the world; the bottom line is he knowingly deceived people, the very people who had put all their faith and hope in him.
Why do politicians think they can get away with lying about an affair? Just admit it! If it was worth the risk, admit it!
I am very disappointed in John Edwards. I feel so very sorry for his wife and his children. As far as the woman he cheated with... She knew what she was getting into and she chose to take the plunge anyway. I have no sympathy for her. She probably had an ulterior motive to begin with. Now, she can join the ranks of the other infamous women who have brought down powerful men. Move over Monica! The sad thing is the party suffers. This is just what the Repulsive Republicans needed to fuel the attack machine. Thanks, John!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement