Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What Makes Female Suicide Bombers Different?

By Courtney E. Martin, Huffington Post. Posted August 6, 2008.


The media portrays female suicide bombers as coerced, but the factors that drive women to strap on explosives are often the same that drive men.
Advertisement

Last week four more Iraqi suicide bombers struck, leaving the mainstream media dumbfounded. Anchors from Atlanta to New York asked pundits: "What do you make of this?" "What could the motivation be?" "Who put them up to it?"

After five years of a war filled with attacks of this nature, you wouldn't expect the media to be so shocked and awed, but there was one critical factor that had the anchors stumbling: all four suicide bombers were female.

Female suicide bombers are, in fact, not a new phenomenon. According to Debra D. Zedalis, author of Female Suicide Bombers, the first known attack by a woman is traced back to 1985, when 16-year-old Khyadali Sana drove a truck into an Israeli Defense Force Convoy, killing two soldiers. Since then women from Sri Lanka, Chechnya, Palestine, Turkey, and Israel (among others) have participated in suicide bombings. In fact, the Tamil Tigers in Sri Lanka use women between 30 and 40 percent of the time when carrying out such attacks.

Starting in 2003, Iraq has experienced over 50 suicide bombings carried out by women, 20 of them just in the last year. It is no longer justifiable for the media to act aghast when another woman turns up with blood on her hands.

How could a woman do this? As doctoral student Lindesy O'Rourke argued in her New York Times op-ed last weekend, women appear to have the same motivations as their male counterparts -- as O'Rourke puts it, "a deep loyalty to their communities combined with a variety of personal grievances against enemy forces." Women, like men, have the capacity for ideological extremism and retaliatory violence.

A more important question is, what conditions make suicide bombing a viable option for human beings -- be they men or women? And, further, what is our role, as Americans, in perpetuating these conditions?

The majority of suicide attackers, of either gender, are young. CNN reports that the U.S. military has a 14-year-old would be suicide bomber in custody, indeed a woman. Averagely, they are in their early 20s, an age known for exploration and ideation.

These young people get pulled into nationalistic or ethnically-based organizations (no woman, to date, has been involved in an independent suicide attack) that promise them a way to make their lives meaningful. Many, though not all, of them come from economically depressed families, towns and cities ravaged by long and bloody war, and relationships that have left them psychologically vulnerable.

In one of the best investigations of female suicide bombers to date, journalist Jan Goodwin secured an interview with Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) failed suicide bomber Menake, currently awaiting sentencing in Sri Lankan prison. Menake's alcoholic, abusive father killed her mother when she was just three years old and brutally raped her at the age of seven. An excerpt from that interview, which appeared in Marie Claire magazine:

Menake wrote to the LTTE secretariat. "I'm willing to become a Black Tiger," she wrote. "It would be an honor. Please let me have your permission to join."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iraq, suicide bombers, sri lanka, tamil tigers

Courtney E. Martin is the author of Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters: The Frightening New Normalcy of Hating Your Body. You can read more about her work at www.courtneyemartin.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
It's a big shell game and the poor lose every which way :(
Posted by: stellabloo on Aug 6, 2008 3:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interesting article from Memri.org - interesting in a creepy kind of way:

Tools For Preparing Women to Carry Out Jihad and Suicide Operations

Basically it translates passages from several jihadist websites specifically targeting women. Nothing like going directly to the source.

Now, appalled as I am by this mass of unexpurgated hate literature, I cannot help but wonder about the motivations of the website authors. Is it the cry of the oppressed or the cry for human cogs to feed the machinery of that same oppression?

After all, at the same time our youth is being exhorted to travel overseas to do the same thing, only our propaganda vaguely promises to bring to bring them back alive and whole.

And meanwhile, a stone's throw away in Dubai, glittering city of billionaires, jets fly in and out as usual. Where are the Muslim humanitarians and philanthropists reaching out to the misery of the Palestinian slums?

If I read my history correctly, the US, Britain, the Zionists AND the Arab countries worked together with great efficiency to create the current Middle East pressure cooker. No doubt about it, oil is big business and so is war :(

As yourself why it is that the 'Middle Ease situation' has been raging unabated these last fifty years and more (depending on the waning popularity of the wars against communism and drugs).... and now we're all still so surprised?

And while the poorest of the poor have grown ever more poor and desperate, the Bushes', their close friends and family and all their other good friends, Jewish AND Arab, have become gigglionnaires. So, as others have pointed out recently, who's to say that their plan isn't working exactly as intended?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]