Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

It's Time for Obama to Get Tough

By Glenn Hurowitz, Huffington Post. Posted August 4, 2008.


Americans are angry. They want and need a president who can channel their frustration and fight hard for himself and the American people.
Advertisement

How is it that despite adulatory media coverage, long lines of volunteers at his campaign offices, and Americans deeply unhappy about the direction of the country, Barack Obama is rapidly losing support -- and control of the agenda -- to John McCain?

It's because Obama has reverted to the whiny, wimpy style that nearly allowed Hillary Clinton to wipe him out in September, 2007 -- until he found his backbone and actually started to stand up for himself.

When McCain launches volley after volley of attack on Obama's policies (with photos of Paris and Brittany thrown in to get the media's attention), what's Obama's response? To ride in on his My Little Pony and cry because McCain is -- how low! -- criticizing his policies and questioning his capacity to lead in a mildly creative way.

This self-righteous simpering might make Obama supporters feel like he's "changing the tone" of politics, but it's not doing anything to stop his slide, shape the debate, or answer the legitimate question the McCain campaign keeps asking: Is Obama actually ready to lead?

So far, Obama's response is to give McCain's advisers exactly what they want: McCain attacks, Obama complains about the attacks and then capitulates on everything from illegal wiretapping to offshore oil drilling. Obama is once again caught up in the great Democratic myth that voters make up their minds by carefully calibrating which candidate's issue positions are closest to his own (a major topic of my book, Fear and Courage in the Democratic Party).

Newsflash, Obama: To most voters, campaigns are not an egghead mental Olympics between two walking policy platforms. They're primal battles that test how candidates respond under fire. And for the last several weeks, Obama has been failing that test: crying about McCain's attacks and then surrendering. To most voters, this sends a simple message: if Obama can't stand up to a babbling incompetent like John McCain, how is he ever going to stand up to the oil executives, the health care lobby, or, for that matter, Osama bin Laden?

Of course, it's not as if McCain is passing this trial by fire with flying colors. When he gets criticized, he tends to respond with incoherent ramblings unhinged from either reality or his own past statements. But that's not getting noticed because McCain isn't facing much fire -- all he's facing is Obama's whining.

The good news is that we've been here before, and Obama has shown a capacity to emerge from his fetal crouch, stop spewing only rhetorical rainbows and daisies, and start throwing some lethal punches of his own. In the summer of 2007, Obama was riding all his inspiring hopes and dreams to...a 23 point deficit in the national polls. After being encouraged by Arianna Huffington, Isaiah Wilner and others to "start running for President of the United States instead of class president," he did just that and launched some effective, hard-hitting attacks on Hillary's voting record and her ties to corporate lobbyists. It was the critical moment of the 2007 campaign when Obama effectively upended Hillary's inevitability narrative and regained momentum.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, election08, mccain, presidential campaigns

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Outstanding Column ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Aug 4, 2008 12:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But maybe this whimpy, self absorbed, stupidly smiling loser is the real Obama.

vote green ...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Outstanding Column ... Posted by: beautifulady2003
» RE: Outstanding Column ... Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Outstanding Column ... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Outstanding Column ... Posted by: StillStanding
» RE: Outstanding Column ... Posted by: adempatriot
» Simply not true!!! Posted by: lefty010
» No Lefty! Don't smoke it!!! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: Simply not true!!! Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Simply not true!!! Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Simply not true!!! Posted by: lefty010
» RE: Simply not true!!! Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Simply not true!!! Posted by: lefty010
» it won't be a green landslide... Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: Outstanding Column ... Posted by: Knot_Rich
Obamarama x4
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 4, 2008 1:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've posted this message x3 and I have warned/predicted that McCain and his nitwits will "swift boat" Obama into Kerryville in November. The unthinkable is happening and it looms likely that the Democrats will snatch defeat at the polls from what should be a total rout. Obama cannot get it through his head that Bush is a crook and his policies are a disaster that threatens the existence and relevance of a once potent nation. Those of us that had hope for him now see his pathetic cave-in on the 2008 FISA Amendments Act as a patent example that there is more of Bush in him than any of us want or deserve. Will he change? No way, he doesn't know who the hell he is or what he is seeking. FDR or JFK he ain't, but we damned sure don't need any more "compassionate conservatism" laced with murder and "voodoo economics!"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obamarama x4 Posted by: richholland
» Styling and profiling are repugnant Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» ! Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: Obamarama x4 Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Obamarama x4 Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Obamarama x4 Posted by: StillStanding
» Nader and McKiney alternatives Posted by: Col. Jackleg
» RE: Obamarama x4 Posted by: christianslayer1955
» RE: Obamarama x4 Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Obamarama x4 Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Obamarama x4 Posted by: greenthumb
Timing
Posted by: RobNLA on Aug 4, 2008 2:09 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with this article, Obama will need to stop pulling punches and get tougher on McCain.
He promised to run such a campaign after the primaries but so far hasn't really done it.

Obama might be waiting until those punches will have a more profound effect on the election. He should learn from Kerry mistakes and start throwing some hard punches now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Timing Posted by: StillStanding
» RE: Timing Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Timing Posted by: StillStanding
» RE: Timing Posted by: wwarner44
There is no time like the present
Posted by: bryangalt on Aug 4, 2008 2:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Note to Obama:

Those of us in America who have not sold our sanity to the Republican brand name need you. We need you to save our Republic by getting with the program.

It's sad and unfortunate that so many people out there are so willing to sell this country down the river because you aren't behaving in a manner which befits their point of view, but that's the harsh reality of where we are in American politics today.

Barbaric? Yep. The way of the world? Yep. Modern Roman even? Yep.

So, get your shit together sir. It's time to win this election or its going to be the harshest years in American history as a result.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There is no time like the present Posted by: nochicagoboys
» Tin-foil hat time Posted by: brunowe
» No, for you, blind, deaf, and dumb... Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Ahhhh... Posted by: Cybershaman
» I'll take a tin-foil visor, please Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Tin-foil hat time Posted by: helenwheels
Take off the gloves, Obama!
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 4, 2008 2:48 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In 2004, I busted my butt to get John Kerry elected, not as a Democrat (which I'm not), but as a member of the nonpartisan organization, Veterans for Kerry. I can't tell you how disappointed I was -- no, make that "mad as hell!" -- because John didn't fight back against the GOP's swiftboat smear campaign.

Now the McCain team is doing it again -- using Karl Rove dirty tricks plus the race card to beat Barrack, the most inspirational leader I have ever seen and I've been voting in presidential elections since 1956.

To help Barrack get tough, Democratic 527's should attack McCain's so-called "heroic" war record. For a facts-check that shows how "Songbird" McCain distorted his POW experience and exploited it for political gain, visit my new nonprofit Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com.

If you agree with my findings and love America, please tell your friends and family about UnitMcCain.com.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, lifelong registered Republican and former McCain supporter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» God, I hope so, Lauren. Posted by: HughScott
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
» Re-read your post for errors.. Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: Take off the gloves, Obama! Posted by: progressive-life
» RE: Take off the gloves, Obama! Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Take off the gloves, Obama! Posted by: left_libertarian
» RE: Take off the gloves, Obama! Posted by: LionHeart
A fiqurehead or a Team Leader?
Posted by: weathered on Aug 4, 2008 3:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'll take the latter, we're going to need to do alot of heavy lifting to repair the bush war on America.

That will take a team of talent. Populating his Cabinet w/seasoned, honorable leadership is essential. Surrounding that Cabinet w/distinguished advisors is critical.
Reaching outside the box to marshall the best talent and laying out a plan to execute is what we want and need to hear and see.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's Time For White People To Stand Up
Posted by: desidid on Aug 4, 2008 3:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If and when White people make a stand as David Gergen did on This Week, then Obama will be able to get tough. Right now he is so busy kissing your asses to win an election, that he risks losing some support among Blacks. I for one, am less impressed with his message everyday.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It's Time For White People To Stand Up Posted by: progressive-life
Question:
Posted by: Blink on Aug 4, 2008 3:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"...if Obama can't stand up to a babbling incompetent like John McCain, how is he ever going to stand up to the oil executives, the health care lobby, or, for that matter, Osama bin Laden?"

Answer: He isn't, because he can't. This wind-sock and Big Nothing is going to be continuously exposed for the wimp and incompetent that he is and that some of us have known since he first appeared on the national scene. He even looks like Stanley Laurel!

Great choice, Dems! Can't wait to see the O-man make an utter fool of himself in the three debates that he has no way of getting out of and go down in flames in November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Question: Posted by: adempatriot
» RE: Question: Posted by: greenthumb
You Don't Hold UP A Poker Game Without A Shotgun
Posted by: thebeerdoctor on Aug 4, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since I am not an Obama or McCain supporter, as a no dog in this fight observer, I think Glen Hurowitz makes a valid point. Since the McCain campaign is all about impugning the character of Senator Obama, it doesn't do any good to complain about the McCain campaign's tactics. To do so in fact, makes Senator Obama appear even weaker. The Obama campaign should brace for attacks on their candidate's biography; the fact that Barack Obama was never really poor, that he attended a private college preparatory school in Hawaii, from the 5th grade on... it will all be coming.
Despite McCain's posturing as a high minded maverick. He is as Ross Perot described "a classic opportunist". He knows that politics, especially at this level, is a blood sport where all weapons are on the table.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This article is way off base!
Posted by: sheena2u on Aug 4, 2008 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a bunch of rot, and driveling about nothing.

Obviously the author of this article has not been listening to Senator Obama, or understanding anything. Lily-livered? Little Red Pony? What a bunch of soppy baloney!

Senator Obama has responded appropriately to McCain. McCain has not yet said anything. McCain is not talking about the issues, and has nothing to say. He is so out of ideas and out of steam that he has degenerated to personal attacks that make him sound like the loser who didn't get on the cheerleading team, and is full of sour grapes. McCain suggested Senator Obama had not gone to the Middle East recently, and was not presidential. So, Senator Obama went to the Middle East and Europe and he was embraced and loved. They have the good sense to recognize a leader. McCain has been largely ignored in his travels, and in his speeches in America, and he just sounds jealous and pouty and he hasn't said anything worth responding to.

This article is wrong, wrong-headed, and a bunch of irrelevant, erroneous nonsense.

Senator Obama is much stronger than some simpleminded hot head who goes around fighting with both fists high whenever anything is said. He has the intelligence and wisdom to pick his battles, and to know when his opponents and detractors are already their own worst enemies. He is a gentleman, but he is not and has never been weak or wimpy. That the author of this article accuses him of such just shows his shallowness and lack of intelligence and understanding about anything.

I think Alternet can do better than this! Please give us some good articles because this one stunk.

If the American public is "so angry" I suggest they use their grey matter, and channel that anger in a way that will do some good. Go out and register voters. Give money to Senator Obama's campaign, and work for his campaign. Support the Democratic senators and congresspeople who are running for office. Support the DNC, the DCCC, and do something useful! This article was destructive, and useless, and the author appears to have a very limited and shallow understanding of Senator Obama and a great many things.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This article is way off base! Posted by: peacefullaim
» RE: This article is way off base! Posted by: beautifulady2003
» RE: This article is way off base! Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: This article is way off base! Posted by: beautifulady2003
» RE: This article is way off base! Posted by: christianslayer1955
A game of hardball anyone!
Posted by: carbon-based on Aug 4, 2008 4:53 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First , ARIANNA HUFFINGTON - shes a big mouth that spouts nothing but the obvious. I rarely see an original thought from her.

Next. Obama though he says he's trying to take the high road, never has. He has attacked Obama, even indirectly, by linking him to Bush (nothing could be further from the truth) then there is the age thing.

I dont think Obama is rolling over for anyone. He should complain if he feels ad's aren't above board - that doesn't make him weak. I think he has the ability to play dirty as evidenced by his attacks on Hillary and on McCain.

I would trust him to play hardball with anyone!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A game of hardball anyone! Posted by: Rosannasfriend
» RE: A game of hardball anyone! Posted by: carbon-based
» That's enough information for me to... Posted by: Illiteratilumen
You still believe Pollsters??? Lies proven by 'Stats'
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 4, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having a degree in Soc, having conducted a 'survey' for my 400 level class project- i stopped listening to Pollester decades ago!
No matter what they claim about the 'scientific methods' these surveys are innately Biased and sometimes intentional set up to 'prove' their own predestine 'results'
Start with how the questions are Phrased, how they are laid out in progession, the pollsters own demographic and 'comfort zone', where they stand, which people they approach (and don't approach), the inflection in their voice, their body language......There is no possilbe way to have a true random sample.Even if you elimiate the Surveyor variable and set up a kioske for people to take surveys on line, or i written form- you will only get those willing to take the time and have the mindset to participate. You still have the opportunity to skew it with the Questions and Formulation.
Also wha tamazes me is the 'Media' thinks Ameircans can't add- One Recent Polls stated Obama 47, Mac 41= 88%, so who are those who refuse to answer....Those the Huff Po suggested Not answer the pollsters anymore. Those who are sick of Political bullshit? Could those be the ones who may vote for Obama - but hate to take surveys's or just hate Pollsters? so who will those who say 'Go fuck Yourself' vote for- those who are sick of the same old Crap?
Barr is no contender, and Nadar is a Red herring Again- neither are in it to win it, just to be the koolaid on the lips of the misguided and manipulated.
I'm not watching the numbers, their a charade. What is most reveling though are the non responders- those 12%.
If Obama names another real patriot, a non Corp whore from the Old Scholl Republican party, That 12% will be his.

OBAMA/HAGEL '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» HAGEL! That is INSANE! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
Obama - check out Florida
Posted by: reinaldok on Aug 4, 2008 5:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is no place like Florida for anyone to realize the absurdity of Obama's run for the presidency. Many of us backed him from day one but we are now totally befuddled. He still insists on bowing down to the ultra - ultra right CANF (not to mention the AIPAC). Can someone explain to me why he continues to back the Miami Cuban mafia and backs DUBYA's ridiculous never ending "embargo" policy? No one seems to follow the events of the Lieberman style demo congresswoman from Broward county, (Ms Wasserman-Schultz) who refuses to refure her supposrt of the three repub Cuban-American congressional representatives from Miami. What a disgrace!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama - check out Florida Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Obama - check out Florida Posted by: cmaciain
McPain has one foot in The GRAVE and the other on a Banana Peel!
Posted by: williameon on Aug 4, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Presidency takes a young men and makes him old.
What will it do to this frail sick old man?
McPain will never survive.
We can do better and Obama is the answer.
McPain equals more of the same!

Let Obama fight the good fight.
It got us here.
He knows what to do.
Help him and
Stop the back stabbing.
Go local.

The Faux Media is bashing him already.
Blaming everything on the Democrats!
BU__! SH__!

Do you believe Rove and his talking points?
They permeate everything.
Endless free air time and access to a biased, censored, corrupt, media system.
Endless airtime and attack dogs to do the Corpirate dirty work.
None for you!
What a charade!
It is blaring out of every Corporate Megaphone, Parrot's face and ignorant Jackass's mouth.
Gee that’s original.
Repeating what you hear on the Boob.
You’re being set up, again.
Being lead down the primrose path by the same old crooks that have ruined this Country for the last fifty+ years.
12 trillion in debt and what do you have to show for it?
Besides, $600 Dollars,
A Hospital and a Grave yard filled with our abandoned youth.
Was it worth it?
That’s right we sold them down the river and for what?
Instead of buying them Freedom ( Heath care, Clean Air, Pure water, Jobs, Homes, a College Education and a living Wage) with our Blood,
We let them pay for more Corporate death and destruction with theirs.
So, much for making this a better place.
I see Nothing!
Nothing good about it!
They will steal over 20 million votes this time around.
So much for the land of the Free!
They are free to do anything they want while roasting your balls over an open fire.
Why because they can and you let them.
What a Hoax!
What a SHAM!
Now they're trying to cover their a-ses with even more BU__! SH__!
And bigger, nastier, horrendous Crimes.
Including Graft, Stealing, Corruption, Lying, Spying, Treason, Torture, Terror, Assassination and Murder!
Which by the way are all impeachable offenses my friends.
In the Black House now we have
a Black Resident already.
King George II
A blight on Humanity!
Selected and NEVER elected!

What must we overcome?
Black Boxes, methodical Propaganda a well financed, machine based on GREED.
Easy when you have all the money and are willing to do anything to keep it.
Caging lists and
Blind Attorney Generals.

I say, make an end run.
Go around it
Go around their corrupt, violent system.
Deal Direct
Go direct to the people.
Support them.
Move to Micro Democracy Now.
Use the money to protect Home Base instead of the Corpirate Enemy.
The Corpirate Plutocracy

The fundamental flaw in their system based on GREED.
A negative human trait.
Selfishness and Greed is the evil in the world we must face.
It works great for them and very poorly for us.
All for the Corpirates and Nothing for you!
The Corpirate Dominion.
How do you stop it?
Pull the plug and
Shut it off!
Buy Freedom with all The Bush Dollars you have left,
before they’re completely worthless.

Survive and Prosper!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

basic instinct
Posted by: Quasar on Aug 4, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Even (or particularly) at the most basic level, we want don't like to see people we like get pushed around - especially when we are helpless to stop the bullying. More intense still is the ache to see that person stand up for himself and become the leader we want him to be.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: basic instinct Posted by: oldurn
The Wesley Clark incident was a defining moment
Posted by: PaulS on Aug 4, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's failure to stand up for Wesley Clark's perfectly reasonable, rational statement that being a fighter pilot and prisoner of war doesn't qualify one to be President was the worst thing Obama has done so far. He betrayed an ally and exhibited pure unadulterated cowardice in failing to stand by Clark's statement. Obama and his advisors learned nothing from the spring disasters in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Indiana and Texas, where Hillary. It's deja vu all over again. He needs to stop the posturing and give voters a specific program that can be explained in two sentences. And "Change you can believe in" is not one of them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carol Burns
Posted by: Carol Burns on Aug 4, 2008 6:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The McCain camp loves to portray Obama as weak, inexperienced, and "whiny". Why help them along?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Carol Burns Posted by: greenthumb
» RE: Carol Burns Posted by: Lauren
Watch the Iran ball!
Posted by: chorton on Aug 4, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Huowitz' main thrusts: Obama needs to stop yielding ground on his positions, hit back harder and channel the anger of the people. As thebeerdoctor suggests, we can expect serious swift-boating. Obama (and we) need to meet McCain's personal attacks in kind. However I agree with sheena2u that Hurowitz' tone and choice of words reads like something out of the Republican playbook, and lends aid and comfort to the enemy.

But don't get too mesmerized by this unfolding drama, it may not be where the real action is taking place. A deeper crisis may be about to explode. Bush's "deadline" for Iran to comply with US demands that they stop making enriched-uranium reactor fuel has come and gone without an Iranian capitulation. HCR 362, a virtual Congressional declaration of war on Iran, still has around 220 congressional co-sponsors. War opponents have been gaining some traction by embarrassing liberal co-sponsors of this awful bill and getting them to publicly express reservations and demand rewriting of the part that effectively authorizes a naval blockade. Perhaps because of this the bill is stalled in committee, but it is still hanging there, ready for quick deployment in the event of a Pressidential call to action or an (almost certainly fabricated) Iranian provocation. And HCR 362 has nearly slipped out of sight, due to the highly disciplined and impressive conspiracy by the Corporate Media to not mention its existence, not even once!

(Check it out! Google it and read up on it; then go to Yahoo News, Advanced Search, and see which national news outlets have mentioned it in the last month: "Iran 362" + "ABC,CBS, ... , NPR,New York Times, ..." You'll draw a blank!)

Deadline? 220 Co-sponsors? Total media blackout? Plus Bush OK-ing an Israeli attack? Israel warning an attack on Iran is coming? An op-ed in the Times warning that it's a certainty and may involve nukes? Folks, the fix appears to be in; and Obama has said nothing to indicate that he will do anything to try to stop this calamity. Maybe he can't. We don't know what's going on in the back rooms, what Bush and Cheney and Obama's corporate sponsors have threatened. But war with Iran will shift the national conversation in a way that gives McCain a decisive advantage.

If Bush/Cheney get their war with Iran, it's going to be dramatic and ugly, and the media frenzy of jingoism, hate and distortion will be intense. In the face of this, Obama will have three choices. He can play "me too", but try to keep the campaign focused on domestic issues. That's a loser. He can play "war leader", and get more righteous and strident than McCain. Then the issue becomes: who do you want for war leader, Obama or McCain? That's a loser. Or he can lead the people in resisting this war, and in making the linkage between the disastrous plight of the American working people and the Middle East wars. Obama has already signaled that he has no stomach for such a fight, and has done nothing to prepare for it. It's not going to happen.

So where does that put us, Obama's progressive supporters? It appears to me that our only hope for salvaging the Obama campaign and preventing a McCain presidency is for the war with Iran to not happen; and our most vital contribution would be to help stop it before it starts! Now! But How?

Let's talk about that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Iran strike VERY soon Posted by: Bobsays
» RE: Iran strike VERY soon Posted by: weathered
» RE: Watch the Iran ball! Posted by: Southern Gal
» RE: Watch the Iran ball! Posted by: chorton
» RE: Watch the Iran ball! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Maybe he can't. Posted by: Lauren
Obama's getting tough alright in the WRONG direction !!! NADER RULZ !!!
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 4, 2008 6:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every time Obama moves to the "right" no matter the issue or vote on a piece of shit legislation, my wife and I DOUBLE our donations to the Nader campaign. After Obama completes his move to the "right" by the end of this month, we'll be VERY VERY VERY at both Obama and Mccain, we'll even wish that Nader can somehow break through and win. I look forward to Nader pulling a huge percentage maybe even pulling a Perot '92 and don't blame us Nader voters when Obama LOSES and even goes down in FLAMES come November !!

RALPH NADER FOR PRESIDENT !!!!

VOTENADER.ORG

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

He better not look to the UK for solutions
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 4, 2008 6:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because the Labour Party is blowing up big style and their policies are a failure (actually increasing poverty and social division). Look to Europe for social democratic solutions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's leadership style is a mystery to most of us
Posted by: greenthumb on Aug 4, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's leadership style should not be a mirror of the Republican's.If you want a leader who is rigid, unethical, ineffectual, incompetent, insular and coercive, then vote Republican by all means.

If you want a leader that believes in engaging others by creating shared agreement,has a distinctive voice (his message is that "WE ARE THE ONES WE HAVE BEEN WAITING FOR"),has the capacity to adapt, values ethics and our constitutional form of government, then you want Obama.

Do you have the courage and commitment to stand up for him as your leader? Or do you just scream and whine on the sidelines like some crazy soccer parent?

Haven't you realized by now no matter what position he takes it will be picked apart by the Rethugs? They work overtime analyzing everything he says and does.Get off your butts and support him or go away.(It's called commitment).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» bless you Greenthumb Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: bless you Greenthumb Posted by: Lauren
» RE: bless you Greenthumb Posted by: greenthumb
WAIT FOR THE DEBATES
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Aug 4, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama will leave McCain looking stupid and not at all informed. He'll bury him without being obnoxious. That approach is very disarming to a man like McCain who probably prefers a shouting match. Personally I like Obama's style. I'm tired of the "authority" figure in the White House talking to me as though I were a 6 yr. old who won't behave. Obama is capable of a cheap shot if it's necessary. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WAIT FOR THE DEBATES Posted by: Moira61