Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Heart of the Economic Mess

By Robert B. Reich, Robert Reich's Blog. Posted August 4, 2008.


Most Americans can no longer maintain their standard of living. And the core problem isn't the housing crisis or rising oil and food prices.
Advertisement

The Federal Reserve Board's "beige book" for June and July offers a clear explanation for why the economy has slowed to a crawl. It shows American consumers cutting way back on their purchases of everything from food to cars, appliances and name-brand products. As they do so, employers inevitably are cutting back on the hours they need people to work for them, thereby contributing to a downward spiral.

The normal remedies for economic downturns are necessary. But even an adequate stimulus package will offer only temporary relief this time, because this isn't a normal downturn. The problem lies deeper. Most Americans can no longer maintain their standard of living. The only lasting remedy is to improve their standard of living by widening the circle of prosperity.

The heart of the matter isn't the collapse in housing prices or even the frenetic rise in oil and food prices. These are contributing to the mess, but they are not creating it directly. The basic reality is this: For most Americans, earnings have not kept up with the cost of living. This is not a new phenomenon, but it has finally caught up with the pocketbooks of average people. If you look at the earnings of nongovernment workers, especially the hourly workers who comprise 80 percent of the work force, you'll find they are barely higher than they were in the mid-1970s, adjusted for inflation. The income of a man in his 30s is now 12 percent below that of a man his age three decades ago. Per-person productivity has grown considerably since then, but most Americans have not reaped the benefits of those productivity gains. They've gone largely to the top.

Inequality on this scale is bad for many reasons, but it is also bad for the economy. The wealthy devote a smaller percentage of their earnings to buying things than the rest of us because, after all, they're rich. They already have most of what they want. Instead of buying, the very wealthy are more likely to invest their earnings wherever around the world they can get the highest return.

This underlying earnings problem has been masked for years as middle- and lower-income Americans found means to live beyond their paychecks. But they have now run out of such coping mechanisms. As I've noted elsewhere, the first coping mechanism was to send more women into paid work. Most women streamed into the work force in the 1970s less because new professional opportunities opened up to them than because they had to prop up family incomes. The percentage of American working mothers with school-age children has almost doubled since 1970, to more than 70 percent. But there's a limit to how many mothers can maintain paying jobs.

So Americans turned to a second way of spending beyond their hourly wages: They worked more hours. The typical American now works more each year than he or she did three decades ago. Americans became veritable workaholics, putting in 350 more hours a year than the average European, more even than the notoriously industrious Japanese.

But there's also a limit to how many hours Americans can put into work, so Americans turned to a third coping mechanism: They began to borrow. With housing prices rising briskly through the 1990s and even faster from 2002 to 2006, they turned their homes into piggy banks by refinancing home mortgages and taking out home-equity loans. But this third strategy also had a built-in limit. And now, with the bursting of the housing bubble, the piggy banks are closing. Americans are reaching the end of their ability to borrow, and lenders have reached the end of their capacity to lend. Credit-card debt, meanwhile, has reached dangerous proportions. Banks are now pulling back.

As a result, typical Americans have run out of coping mechanisms to keep up their standard of living. That means there's not enough purchasing power in the economy to buy all the goods and services it's producing. We're finally reaping the whirlwind of widening inequality and ever-more-concentrated wealth.

The only way to keep the economy going over the long run is to increase the real earnings of middle-class and lower-middle-class Americans. The answer is not to protect jobs through trade protection -- that would only drive up the prices of everything purchased from abroad. Most routine jobs are being automated anyway. Nor is the answer to give tax breaks to the very wealthy and to giant corporations in the hope they will trickle down to everyone else. We've tried that, and it hasn't worked. Nothing has trickled down.

Rather, the long-term answer is for us to invest in the productivity of our working people -- enabling families to afford health insurance and have access to good schools and higher education -- while also rebuilding our infrastructure and investing in the clean energy technologies of the future. We must also adopt progressive taxes at the federal, state and local levels. In other words, we must rebuild the American economy from the bottom up. It cannot be rebuilt from the top down.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, economic crisis, standard of living, financial crisis, cost of living

Robert Reich is a professor of public policy at the Richard and Rhoda Goldman School of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He was secretary of labor in the Clinton administration.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bandaid for a Broken Back ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Aug 4, 2008 12:47 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reich's recipe for economic recovery is timid at best, wishful thinking comes to mind. The measures he is proposing are vague and lack luster, and fall way short of real and vibrant comprehensive plan to turn the economy around.

How about these proposals for starters.

Medicare for all ...

Free daycare ...

Raising the minimum wage to a real minimum wage of $10 an hour with automatic yearly raises for inflation.

Raising the poverty level to $40,000 for a family of four to enable further Federal help.

Increased education grants for college to cover all the tuition and most of the room and board.

And because this will all cost a lot, higher tax rates on the rich and corporations while eliminating all the loopholes.

Cutting Military and Homeland Security spending by 10% a year for 5 years.

A Public Central Bank that will create money with no interest and arbitrage credit in the financial system. After all, why should we pay interest on our right to print money. This will bring in hundreds of millions perhaps over a trillion dollars a year to pay down the deficit and still afford the programs we need to support families.

If the Democrats are thinking like Reich they are trying a bandaid on a broken back. As it looks now the bankers will get bailed out while the middle class will shoulder the bill for the bankers fraud, greed and incompetence. As it stands now we will be paying over $500 billion a year just in interest to pay for the mess that has been created. This catastrophy will not be solved by business as usual.

The challenges ahead call for radical measures. We are looking at peak oil, the outsourcing of our productive capacity, global warming and the beginning of the demise of capitalism as we know it as production outruns both consumers and resources. We need solutions for all these problems not the same old rehashed pabulum that Reich is peddling.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» u r right Posted by: Christian Southern Liberal
» RE: u r right Posted by: Christian Southern Liberal
Sorry, this comment has been removed from the system.
Trickle-down doesn't work because...
Posted by: thornwolf on Aug 4, 2008 1:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trickle-down doesn't work because, unlike water, money flows uphill. No matter where money is inserted into an economic system, it begins it inexorable movement upward. This is why tax cuts for the rich benefit no one but the rich, the very people who don't need it.

Who ramps up production in the absence of increased demand? No one, obviously. Who hires "extra" help? Ridiculous idea. Tax cuts for the rich is a patently ridiculous idea. It is economic fraud, driven no doubt by greed.

What would the be result of reversing the tax-cut pyramid? What if the first $30,000 or so of earned income were tax free? What would people do with that money? They'd spend it! The money they spend will bubble up tot he top just like always, but the difference now is that everyone will prosper, not just the wealthy. The rich will get richer, but so will everyone else.

That's the way to rev up the economy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yabba dabba doo
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 4, 2008 3:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Who can forget the .com madness of the 1990s that Reich so wholeheartedly endorsed. It was exceeded, perhaps, only by the inanity of Reagan's "voodoo economics" and its trickle down sound bites that remain the hallmark of the 1980s. Quare: when will this penal colony ever adopt, embrace and foster an economic policy that benefits its captives.....er, excuse me....its citizens? It ain't happened since 1776 and it ain't looming now but a man has to believe in something-me, I believe I'll have another drink!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It would serve Obama well
Posted by: weathered on Aug 4, 2008 3:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to invite Mr. Riech to a Cabinet or advisory post, he's an honorable, humble rarity w/pragmatic discipline.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I call for a nation-wide worker strike!
Posted by: JPHickey on Aug 4, 2008 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Though I don't know what I'm talking about, I'm calling for a nation-wide strick of the Americans who actually do the work that keeps this country functioning, or for whatever passes for functioning. We have the power to just close it down until some more amenable arrangements are made.

We, the people have the power. Are we suffering from a bad case of "learned helplesness" or what?

Those who actually do the work have apparently given over their sense of personal responsibility to powers to the managerial manipulators who suffer from sociopathological corporate/governmental predominance.

Do we accept being dominated and exploited because we have lost our will? Are we so submissive that we have slipped into being a status quo "can't do" nation?

I, personally want to kick the pundits in the seat of the pants, and take some more assertive positions and at least define what we want and deserve, then do something. Now is the time to take some real-world action! Power to the people!

This column points out the situation but fails to come through with any list of effective actions we must get going on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dudes: don't play the game and you won't get played
Posted by: Bobsays on Aug 4, 2008 5:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is 90 percent of the disappointment out there? It is disappointment with dreams and illusions that do not match reality. But it is worth considering what those dreams and illusions are, why you have them, and are they really in your best interest?

Why should you have a Hummer and a monster home? Is that the height of human achievement? Why not just a nice apartment and a bike and a cool Euro-girlfriend? Why do you always want more and more and more? Ask that?

People need to change the dream to something that is both healthy and afordable. These calls for a raid on the rich to pay for the monster home/Hummer lifestyle is a prison. Why not live a totally different way of life and detach yourself from their goods and their expectations? You would probably be happier.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You have a point Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» The erosion of Posted by: phoolish
Lessons from history...
Posted by: cordas on Aug 4, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wasn't it one of the grand fathers of capitalism who realised the real way for him to make money was to pay his workers enough to buy his product....

That well known union hater Henery Ford paid his works a high wage because he wanted everyone of his workers to be able to buy one of his cars.

It really is a simple philosophy if you pay your workforce well they will be your consumers, the problem is that big business got stupidly greedy and thought that they could pay their workers less because if everyone else paid well then they where off the hook... the problem is that all companies are greedy and stupid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Different consumers Posted by: suprmark
Great solutions... for Fantasy Land
Posted by: Farasien on Aug 4, 2008 5:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I usually agree with R. Reich's observations and opinions, I believe he is off on this one. Firstly, he says we have to revitalize the economy from the bottom up. This is a great pie-in-the-sky idea, but suffers from the problem of discounting the greed inherent in the powerful elites who control the economy. Nobody who is benefitting from the pain of a broken economic system is going to be willing to surrender the massive payouts they've been getting from their well-bribed cronies in government. The job of politicians in today's world is to keep paydays frequent and large to their owners- period. Such people would never even think to stop the money train to help the masses. Greed doesn't work that way and can't be made to work that way. Secondly, he says investing in green technology and infrastructure is the answer to this, and to that, I can point to the effort to spread the cancer of hard-line capitolism to the rest of the world known as globalization. Why buy locally-made parts for windmills, solar cells or tidal turbines here when China, and soon India, will and are pumping them out at three times the capacity and one-tenth the cost? This is what is really wrong with trade policy- dispite fuel costs, its still cheaper to buy foreign goods than to buy local, thus depressing the wages of the lower 99% of the wage earners in the USA and contributing to the downward spiral. Mr. Reich is right about one thing here- trade protection would drive up the cost of foreign goods, but this is actually a good thing. People might start seeing locally-produced goods as affordable, thus keeping the money from going out of the country and into the pockets of those who are using their economic structures to basnkrupt us. Lastly, he promotes 'free' medicare for all... While I love the idea of having free medical coverage you have to remember that this has to be paid for by SOMEone. Where this comes from, obviously, is taxes. While some of the cost can be mitigated by taxing people differently (progressive tax structure), it will not fully cover the cost of nearly 300 million people. This means taxes on all of us filthy little people will go up- probably WAY up- to cover the difference. This means that the problem has created an even bigger disease- now, while the rich aren't so rich anymore, the poor and middle class aren't either and instead of only some of us eating dirt like the Hatians, we all get to go down togather.

What we want is not for ANY of us to go down, but up, and the policies he proposes, by themselves, won't do this for us.

The problems we face are systemic. They can't be fixed by using the same equasion. Insanity is defined as doing the same thing and expecting a differing result. Take the Fed for example- the only 2 things they can really do are adjust interest rates and print money. If they do either one at this point in history, they will make our current problems drastically worse than they are already. The government can only do what the rules they live by tell them they can do. The time really has come for a complete rewrite of the rulebook. The rules we play by are obviously outmoted. They were good and worked reasonably well for the economy and culture we once had in this nation, but things have changed. Evolution teaches that when conditions change, the organism MUST adapt to fit the new environment or it will die. The time has come for an american evolution. The choice we face is the same one that millions of species have had to face as the environment changes around them... We must rewrite the rules so we can continue to survive in the world, or the country we live in is going to go extinct.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Great solutions... for Fantasy Land Posted by: tommy_slothrop
And where was this author when Clinton sold out in the 90s ?!?
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 4, 2008 5:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice try but wasn't this author the "labor" secretary under Clinton who did not mind soaking the country with NAFTA, GATT, WTO, more labor union busting as if Raygun's wasn't enough already, phoney "Freedom to Farm" Act which basically gave Big Agri the power to smash hardworking farmers who owned small farms, etc ...? Give it up already. Obama is a TRAITOR and more of a sellout given his ties to Tony Rezco and Goldman Sachs !

RALPH NADER FOR PRESIDENT !!!!

VOTENADER.ORG

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Right on! Posted by: Ydotheyhateus
not so fast
Posted by: edgar1 on Aug 4, 2008 6:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The answer is not to protect jobs through trade protection -- that would only drive up the prices of everything purchased from abroad."

Much of what Prof Reich states above makes sense. But not his statement quoted above.He hastily flees from protectionism while throwing out talking points about other remedies(infrastructure, health care investment). Yet unrestricted, and unfair free trade, helped to get the US in this mess beginning in the 80's with free trade agreeements and the rise of China, which of course wants unrestricted access to the US but subsidizes its currency and exploits its own work force.

Economists and analysts looking for a long-term fix for the US economy should not simply discount a nationalist trade policy. It stood the US well for nearly two hundred years when we had to build an industrial base to compete with England. Our young people all can't be medical researchers, NBA stars or gadget salespeople at the Malls. We need to rebuild our industrial base, or we won't have the revenue to rebuild our infrastructure and maintain what leads we now enjoy in biotech and other specialties.

Free trade is nice in theory; most US competitors and practically none of the developing nations practice it.


Let's look into it with an open mind. Free trade advocates won't even defend their position, instead turning their noses down at any Neandrathal who dares questions this sacred text of internationalization.

Too many "progressives" like Prof Reich, let alone probusiness conservatives like Romney, McCain and Bush, who are otherwise longtime friends of the blue collar worker, have abandoned our towns and inner cities to a lack of oppportunity in the interests of "free trade".

Americans won't pay fifty bucks more for an American made flat screen? Toyota had an unrestricted right to enter the US without paying a tariff for the privilege of destroying the US auto industry?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Well said, my friend! Posted by: Yehudi61
» I agree edgar1 Posted by: PaulC
Thanks Robert!
Posted by: Forrest on Aug 4, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We also enjoy listening to your comments on Public Radio.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rearranging deck chairs on a sinking ship is not wisdom
Posted by: SevenStarHand on Aug 4, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The great ship money is about to pop and sink below the waves. The only thing that's going to save humanity from the dangers on the horizon are wisdom and cooperation. The existence of money caused this problem and has been used by greedy leaders "in the shadows" to dupe the entire world into thinking that greed and materialsim were somehow a wise path. As everyone should be able to see, that was a false assumption that is about to pay huge negative dividends.

The only way to prevent disaster, debacle, and enslavement by those who control all money is to grow smart, walk away from that great delusion, and start valuing verifiable wisdom and cooperation.

Money is about to die a horrible death. Jump ship or get sucked down with it.

A lifeboat for the wise...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Youtube "money as debt" interesting and rather scary in today's climate.
Posted by: thekidde on Aug 4, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Our consumeristic culture is killing the planet
Posted by: impeachemall on Aug 4, 2008 7:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Robert Reich opines that the "heart of the economic mess" is that Americans "can no longer maintain their standard of living," and then suggest how we can, once again, return to the standard of living that is killing the planet. All will be well when we can all be uber-consumers again, buying all those "cars, appliances and name-brand products." Why, it's the American Way! It's our birthright! Hell, it's our responsibility as consumers to keep living large and buy-buy-buying, thereby enriching the corporations that rule the world.

We're not citizens -- we're consumers. We hear it daily from our corporate media: "Consumers are nervous," consumers are feeling the pinch...." Consuming our raison d'etre. We are what we own, after all. The corporate empire says so. The Resident Idiot told us on 9/12/0 that, if we wanted to help our country, we should all "go shopping!!" Why, the 9/11 attacks were our fault -- we weren't consuming enough! Dang -- if only we'd known...we coulda been buying bigger mountains of plastic crap we don't need from Wal-Mart. Plastic crap made in third-world countries by people paid slave wages. Then "the terrorists" wouldn't have hated us, and BushCo wouldn't have been able to lie us into an unjust, illegal war for oil and corporate profits.

I'm surprised that AlterNet would print Reich's establishment propaganda.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

banketeering
Posted by: siamdave on Aug 4, 2008 7:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Like pretty much all mainstream 'economists' (many are willing propagandizers, many others unquestioning sycophants, the rest one or two fries short of a small order or whatever), Reich apparently has no understanding that the key to all of this is the answer to one question - Where does the money come from in the first place?????? - private banks create 95-100% of the money supply of countries these days, and demand interest on all that money year after year - and that means that all real wealth (solid property type things) created by the working people of the country is on a one way track from those who produce it to those who create the money. It's explained in more detail here - Banketeering - how the banks have been stealing trillions from you, and the tap is still running . First we take back our brains, then we take back our countries.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Labor Market is a Fraud
Posted by: FoonTheElder on Aug 4, 2008 7:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you listen to the free marketers, you would think that the labor market should already have increased the wages in the U.S.

After all, there has supposedly only been 4-5% unemployment, meaning that there is a tight labor market. Companies are screaming constantly that they can't find enough competent people. They are busy whining for more H1-B visas.

They do everything except increase wages. Why is that? One, the labor and unemployement statistics are frauds. And two, the labor market is controlled by the oligopolists who control all of America's markets. It is not in their interest to increase wages (except at the top management level), so they have manipulated the market, through outsourcing and foreign workers, to keep the wages low.

They control the market to the extent that good paying jobs are constantly removed and replaced with low paying jobs.

For example, Wal-Mart doesn't just control Wal-Mart, it controls the whole retail industry and suppliers.

What happens when another retailer tries to pay more than Wal-Mart? They make less money and their shareholders compare them to Wal-Mart. This is even happening to Costco, who is a successful competitor to Sams Club. Imagine what happens to marginal retailers.

Wal-Mart hammers the price from their suppliers so that they either lower wages or send production to China. The retail competition sees this and does the same thing.

This type of manipulation happens throughout most industries in America. Free trade has brought more consolitation and monopolization for the biggest corporations, instead of real competition for goods, services and labor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Labor Market is a Fraud Posted by: JSquercia
Lessons Learned
Posted by: Southern Gal on Aug 4, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My parents lived through the Great Depression and they passed on some of the lessons learned to their children. First and foremost was to live within your means. If you don't have the money to pay for it, you don't buy it right then. You can save for it and then buy it. They did not make financial decisions without looking at all of the fine print. They also said that you should open your heart to those less fortunate and help them when you can, but guard and protect your money from the banks and businesses.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lessons Learned Posted by: Shey
LOL
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 4, 2008 8:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, lets see here. The cost of EVERYTHING skyrocketing, the amount of money we make STAYS THE SAME? Is it any wonder many cannot cope? Thank you Dictator Bush!

JT
http://www.FireMe.to/udi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not Bush........ Posted by: gellero1
Trickle down is over!
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Aug 4, 2008 8:54 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Trickle down (voodoo) economics have been touted as the best remedy. Those spouting those "free market" fundamentals have been the very ones benefiting from those "tax cuts". No, right now what we need are:(1) to cut back on that military-industrial-complex, (2)no more tax cuts for the rich,(3) increases in the Capital Gains tax rate,(4) increases in corporate taxes, (5)increases in taxes for corporations that move themselves offshore. Just a few recommendations of things needed to be done to re-capture some of the money stolen from main street!

We also need an FDR style re-investment in America. You know we need to fix our out-of-date infra-structure, water quality, more investment in alternative fuel research and development. We need a greater investment in public education. We need more affordable child-care. A lot of working moms are single, they need help!

For the high taxes that I pay (& no I'm not even close to rich), I would prefer that we have universal health-care! Yes, the minimum wage needs to be increased, those that work for the minimum are not just those High School kids, they are hard-working people trying to raise families and they need a break.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

economic solutions?
Posted by: cbishopp on Aug 4, 2008 9:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I realize that there are many theories to this economic downturn and that the graph for the next many years does not offer much hope.
Common sense indicates that the first thing we should do is take back our government!
Our treasury has been hijacked. Our military is in the employ of parties that don't care about the American people or anyone else for that matter.
We can discuss the particulars of this problem but it's been eight years or more in the making and anyone with more than two cents to rub together have been preparing for this.
Why have so many corporations diverted centers of production abroad? Dick Cheney's Halliburton has it's headquarters in Dubai. That says quite a bit.
India's wealthy elite have produced more millionaires this year than ever before but the people of India will not make out either.
The "let them eat cake" mentality is stronger than ever and I am amazed we all allowed it to happen.
Who now owns all the homes that have been vacated? Who will buy up all the debt that America has created as this administration saunters off into the sunset?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: economic solutions? Posted by: edgar1
I like most of it, but
Posted by: sawdust on Aug 4, 2008 10:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is something odd about the fact that if free trade among nations is so great, why are we the only ones practicing it? I think we have a large hole in our foot......

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The myth of "Free Trade" Posted by: fanny666
A simple question
Posted by: BirdGuide on Aug 4, 2008 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that the stock market has gained a ridiculous amount of power in the US - to the point that it drives decent companies (and our economy) toward unrelenting growth, no matter what the consequences. As someone mentioned earlier, Costco is one example of a "bad" company because it aims to serve more than just the bottom line.

I wonder, is it really possible to satisfy shareholder greed AND maintain some measure of social integrity? And if not, is there any way to diminish Wall Street's hold on our country? I'm certainly no economist, but it just seems like this current system cannot continue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obviously the author
Posted by: jc1234 on Aug 4, 2008 1:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hasn't interviewed the hundreds of engineers I have over the past 4 or 5 years, many of whom with exemplary academic performance and can't find jobs. The "need for higher education" swan song never accounts for the lack of jobs higher education used to mean that have been outsourced to slave..er dirt cheap labor markets. When anyone says outsourcing because of free trade isn't the problem, you can rest assured you are listening to someone who is either a liar or ignorant.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Same with science Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Obviously the author Posted by: edgar1
Econ101
Posted by: bflove on Aug 4, 2008 3:34 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Since 1950 there have been 9 recessions-probably 10 if the truth is revealed about the economy now. Republican administrations own 8 of the 9 recessions. That is an 89% correlation to Republican economics. They must love recessions.
In fact it is all about "Supply Side" economics (or trickle down). Econ 101 teaches that economics is about supply and demand. When price/quantity curves are plotted, the supply and demand curves cross in an "X" pattern. The optimal point is at the intersection. The GDP is maximized at that point also. It is an equilibrum fulcrum point that takes time to establish and any movement of one curve without a corresponding movement of the other curve will result in reduced GDP.

Supply siders only favor the suppliers, the rich providers of products and services. The demand curve is represented by the consumers, the work force(the rich don't consume much-they invest)

President Reagan and the Bushies have attacked the normal supply/demand curve with a double whammy. They not only have favored the supply side with monitary incentives; favorable legislation; tax credits; tax breaks; interest rate adjustments; money manipulations; etc; but they have skewed the demand curve by failing to support pay raises, good jobs or benefits for the work force. The result is recession. Our huge national debt resulted from the fact that the Republicans only balanced two of their last 18 budgets!

Using the model of the teeter-totter, the Republicans put all the weight on the supply end and took weight off the demand end until no one can teeter.

The proof of this model is in how they are trying to restore the equilibrium. They are giving money (weight) to the consumers. Our economy would not have gotten out of balance if they would have shared the miracle of capitalism with the workers by giving pay raises, medical benefits, good jobs, etc.

Supply-side economics is the problem-there is no way it will ever work, but there is no need for a revolution. Now that we know what the problem is, it can be fixed. We need to elect a President and Legislators who will restore consumer economics for a few years. NOTE TO REPUBLICANS: I did not say socialism. I am saying the forces of supply and demand must be balanced. Workers would much rather have good paying jobs than welfare. Some people win the lottery and some get wiped out by acts of nature or violence through no action of their own. If we all help each other, we can restore our economy and our nation! Our power is in the vote. Vote on the real issues, not the decoy issues the Republican party fabricates!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Republicrats Posted by: edgar1
Hold the right people responsible
Posted by: blogbooks on Aug 4, 2008 4:14 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It isn't the CEOs and it isn't the politicians, it is the wealthy elite that own and control both of them.

I am sick of the rich hiding behind their pocket politicians and corporate legal constructs. These are not "innocent investors." These are the same mother fuckers that have owned every nation from the beginning of time and exploited the rest of us to support their opulent life styles.

You want to fix something? Go straight to the root of the problem...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Families..... Posted by: gellero1
Reich hasn't a clue (and neither do the people or media)
Posted by: dayahka on Aug 4, 2008 4:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reich has no idea what he's talking about or why. The current malaise in the economy is not something that can be cured by increasing manufacturing or raising wages or getting back to business as usual.

The US and the world face a major shift, a paradigm shift, in economy, based fundamentally on the need to find new sources of energy, new sources of rapidly depleting I-NKP, some way to limit population growth, and some way to wean the species (particularly the American sub-species) off its militaristic ways.

The only solidly rational and just economy is one based on 100 percent taxation: from all, all is taken, and to every one an equal amount is returned, with some set aside for social and environmental projects. What we will have to develop in the future so as to survive as a species (something that is hardly obvious in being a good thing) is a radical overthrow of the entire current global system and the development of an entirely new social compact among all people, globally.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Stealing? Posted by: gellero1
Do rich people shred money?
Posted by: Infogleaner on Aug 4, 2008 8:04 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Reich mentions the rich moving their money overseas to better investments. Is that such a bad thing? The poorest people are overseas and certainly need it the most.

What becomes of the dollars sent overseas? Don't they come back, as we're seeing now with the dollar at an all time low?

Maybe having dollars isn't in your best interest anyways. It would seem hard assets, like tools/equipment/buildings etc. are worth far more than cash.

One thing I've noticed about rich people: THEY DON'T HANG ON TO MONEY!! They move it as quickly as it comes into their hand. If the working poor of this country can stop investing in the bogus bill of goods being sold to them by Madison Avenue, they'll find more money available to them for the things that are really important.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

we are all savants
Posted by: Don Garb on Aug 4, 2008 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I like Dr. Reich, he's a great guy. Very well informed and perceptive. But with this piece I believe he reveals himself to be a savant just like all the rest of us. Very smart in some areas, and missing the boat in others.

Yes, the American way of life has run out of fuel and will now collapse, but no, simple platitude solutions are not going to fix it. The real problem is that not just money flows to the top, the psychopaths flow there as well. The human race is headed for a complete collapse of civilization unless we all look at what's going on and see the evil behind it.

Greed, "the bottom line", tunnel vision, these are all great lies meant to deflect us from the truth. The world is being poisoned by evil psychopaths not just because they are in the antidote business supplying symptomatic relief, but because they LIKE it. It's not about money, it's about domination, it's not happening because people aren't looking, but because destroying a world is the ultimate pleasure for these insane monsters.

The elephant or the 800 pound gorilla in the room that no-one's talking about is called evil. It's evil things that aren't human who are destroying the world, until we learn to look through the lies and see the sick ugly things for what they are, we are just a herd of buffalo being stampeded off a cliff.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» reptilian Posted by: phoolish
» WELL SAID, MY FRIEND... Posted by: jvaljon1
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
Foreclosures can be minimized by using technology for lending
Posted by: Adi on Aug 4, 2008 11:19 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Foreclosures and its cascading effects, damages to the economy can be minimized by using technology to replace greedy lenders and their collaborators and thereby make mortgages affordable at 5% or even lower for 30 yrs fixed for almost all by direct internet based applications/lending by GSE,FHA as most mortgage financing already guaranteed by them & charge additional risk based premium from more risky borrowers non qualified borrowers may be allowed to stay as tenant

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Populism...
Posted by: jvaljon1 on Aug 7, 2008 12:21 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
works. Plain and simple. Still--a caution: it is very true that real economic progress is from the bottom up, not the top down. Also, please, realize:

The American people, already had that largesse during the Clinton years. What that did, however, was to hang the 'carrot' of a gigantic budget surplus in front ot the noses of greedy thieves who smashed America's great economic prosperity to flinders, impoverished the vast numbers of Americans (except of course, the fabled 1% who were actually running the current scam, and who set it up)-and brought us to where we are now; facing the Second Great Depression. What went wrong? Well...

We still need economic populism--in fact, back to the 90s economic policies, is now the only thing that will save us. But it has to go hand in hand with FULLY STAFFED, PROTECTED REGULATORY AGENCIES, to be able not only to oversee but also to act, when the crooks have seized control of the store.

Why don't we have that now? Well...remember the screaming cheers for DEREGULATION, back in the 80s and 90s??? The "we don't need all these rules & regulation" people? THAT WAS US, FOLKS!!!

We handed our prosperity, our security AND our place in the world, over to a gang of crooks whose only promise to us was that they'd "shrink big Gum'mint"--and not only did nobody ask "how?" but we bought into the lie that without our regulatory agencies, somehow we'd all be more prosperous.

So--let it be written in stone or whatever, that--no matter how well we dig ourselves out of this current hole (and we will); in all future prosperity we had better remember that, without our oversight, our Regulatory Agencies, being both protected AND staffed, we'll be right back where we are now, no matter what we do.

Because the crooks, we have always with us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Lots of good ideas of the common people.
Posted by: jporter on Aug 9, 2008 8:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I only got to read one quarter of the comments for this post and would have liked to have read them all as they were very intelligent. However, with about 100 emails a day, many that require reading the whole thing, I have to make cuts as fate dictates. I am sorry for what I lose. If only our president would listen to the posters of these ideas, he/she might do a damn good job.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The USA is reverting to the norm
Posted by: billwald on Aug 9, 2008 12:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one else sees that the USA has been living under freak economic conditions since WW2? We are reverting to the norm - maybe 5% stinking rich, 15% middle class, and 80% working poor.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

ANARCHY FOR THE WEALTHY AND
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Aug 9, 2008 12:51 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
tyranny for the poor and middle class. If I've got that wrong I will apologize.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

End the Federal Reserve
Posted by: ronheri on Aug 9, 2008 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Federal Reserve private banking cartel is the heart of our economic pr