Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Can Obama Turn the Democratic Party Upside Down with the Biggest Voter Mobilization Drive in History?

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted August 4, 2008.


Thousands of grassroots organizers will lead an effort to register millions of new voters and build momentum for political reform.
Advertisement

Barack Obama's presidential campaign is seeking to register "millions" of new voters immediately after the Democratic Convention, according to top campaign officials who say the effort is one facet of a "capacity-building" effort this summer that includes extensively training thousands of campaign workers as community organizers.

The voter registration effort is part of a broader strategy to not just elect Obama, but also to alter the political landscape by shifting power from Washington to the grassroots, the officials say, to cultivate a base for significant political reforms. The campaign sees its training and voter registration efforts as the cornerstone of building a new progressive movement like the rise of conservatism during Ronald Reagan's presidency.

"We need everybody in this party to get behind this effort to turn out thousands and thousands of volunteers in every single state in the country, to hit the streets and go register millions of new people that weekend alone," said Steve Hildebrand, Obama's deputy campaign manager, speaking at the recent Netroots Nation conference. "It's not about whether or not we will get Barack Obama elected. It is about whether or not we will have a progressive majority in this country for decades to come."

Last week, the campaign and the Democratic National Committee announced it would commit $20 million to "engaging and mobilizing" Hispanic voters in an effort that will include "voter mobilization, voter registration, online organizing, community outreach and paid advertising" and "also include Camp Obama trainings around the country."

"We expect our demographic to turn out at 80 percent," said Jason Green, the campaign's national voter registration director. "We are all about cultivating leadership."

The plan to train thousands of new community organizers and register millions of new voters is not business as usual for Democratic presidential campaigns, which for years have been run as top-down operations with little input from the grassroots. Instead, the campaign is seeking to blend the best aspects of community organizing, which stresses relationship building, with established, nuts-and-bolts voter outreach tactics to win.

A handful of experts who have worked in these dimensions of campaigns said the Obama plan realized a longtime hope of community groups to have a real role in presidential campaigns. However, those same people -- who did not want to be named -- questioned whether the Obama campaign had "the experience to do it right." Some longtime Democratic Party campaigners agreed. As one voter outreach expert put it, before listing many things that his group took years to master, "I want to believe."

Neither Hildebrand nor the other campaign officials who divulged their grassroots strategy at the Netroots conference replied to requests for follow-up interviews. However, as the deputy campaign manager concluded his talk, he said there were very good reasons why the campaign's strategy could work in 2008: the public wants real change; its candidate is charismatic; the campaign has the money -- and the volunteers -- to make it work.

"If we don't use this opportunity, if we don't do this right, shame on us," Hildebrand said, "because we will never have it as good as we have it right now."

The Obama campaign also has a track record of winning in 2008's primaries using this same strategy, which it is now institutionalizing for November's election.

Exhibit A: South Carolina

"They said the way you used to win down here is you pay off the ministers, you pay off the state senators and the state reps, and you have some chicken dinners," said Jeremy Bird, the campaign's South Carolina field director during the primary, recounting the thinking he found among local Democrats when setting up shop in March 2007. "That didn't jibe with our candidate's message, or his bio, or anything that he said since he started to run for president or started running for the state senate."

Bird, who joined Hildebrand and others at the forum for bloggers and independent media, exemplified the Obama campaign's new ethos.

Bird began by telling his story -- which echoed the campaign's narrative. He grew up in Missouri in a fundamentalist Southern Baptist family and got involved in community organizing after graduate school in Boston. In 2004, he worked for Howard Dean's presidential campaign, and then for the Democratic National Committee, and after the election for organized labor. After reading one of Obama's books and relating to his work as a voting rights activist after law school, Bird joined the campaign. He arrived in South Carolina in March 2007 with little more than some videos and his acumen as a community organizer.

Instead of courting the local political establishment, Bird said he sought out community leaders and held "thousands of one-on-one meetings," where he would show a video and then listen to their concerns. The meetings typically lasted 45 minutes or more -- a long time for a top staffer of a national political campaign to spend with anyone. The most responsive leaders were then asked to host local gatherings, Bird said, where they introduced the candidate and campaign to their community.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: obama, election08, presidential politics, obama campaign, political reform

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obama
Posted by: Dboy on Aug 4, 2008 1:21 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The voter registration effort is part of a broader strategy to not just elect Obama, but also to alter the political landscape by shifting power from Washington to the grassroots,

Um no, it IS just about electing Obama. After that, they spray a few gallons of RoundUp on the grass roots to kill that off until they are needed again in four years. Funny how they want to "shift power from Washington"...only after the primaries are over. Give me a freakin' break. There are a few lone wolves in Congress who continually speak up for the American people, but they are only allowed to speak so that the "serious people" have a chance to go take a toilet break. The American people no longer have representation in government. After this election, it's back to the raping and pillaging.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama Posted by: richholland
» FISA, NAFTA, border fence... Posted by: Zenobia
» RE: Obama Posted by: Lincoln fan
» sexy woman seeking sex Posted by: kissrosalove013
Organize Your Candidate ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Aug 4, 2008 1:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's Time for Obama to Get Tough

From what I'm seeing Obama is fading and the likelihood of all those voters showing up is diminishing by the day. Obama is offering nothing new and backtracks towards business as usual every time he gets a chance ...

Obama is no longer the candidate of change.

He continues his homage to the financial industry even after it is clear they are pulling the biggest heist in history and leaving tax payers the bill.

He has kissed AIPACs ass and believes we need a bigger military! I guess 750 bases overseas aren't enough and that we need all those Cold War weapons.

His healthcare proposal is weak and I don't see a plan or even hear rhetoric about a real progressive tax program that would reverse the tax windfall or close the loopholes that the corporations and the very rich now enjoy.

What about his positions on trade and the the Employee Free Choice Act?

Americans will wake up to the fact that Obama is just not who they think he is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Organize Your Candidate ... Posted by: richholland
» What's Hugh's problem with Trolls? Posted by: Moore Hognutz
» RE: Organize Your Candidate ... Posted by: rleslie66
Obama supporters can mobilize all they want but he won't win without Hillary on the ticket.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 4, 2008 2:17 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's an old Chinese saying that goes, "Keep your friends close, your enemies closer." Face it, folks. The Clintons are no fans of Barrack Obama. You can bet your bank account they're planning another run for the White House in 2012 -- against President McCain.

Already one pundit has agreed with my premise, NBC's Andrea Mitchell, who suggested the Judas strategy on "Meet The Press" Sunday. The question is, would Hillary and Bill deliberately undermine Barrack's ongoing campaign?

Maybe not. But for sure, they won't do the vigorous campaigning that's needed to help Barrack win over the millions of white women that supported Senator Clinton, many of whom are statistically stealth bigots. Never forget, after all, it was Hillary's campaign team, not McCain's, that first played the race card by calling Obama an "elitist."

On April 16, 2008, the Los Angeles Times published an article by David K. Shipler titled, "The Resonance of Racism." In his op-ed piece, Shipler wrote, "'Elitist' is another word for 'arrogant,' which is another word for 'uppity' -- that old calumny applied to blacks who stood up for themselves."

I have been voting in presidential elections since 1956 and this is the first time in my memory a candidate (Obama) has been called "arrogant" -- a quintessential quality of anyone seeking to become the most powerful leader on Earth, including Senator McCain.

I also was raised in the Deep South (Texas, Louisiana and Florida) by liberal white parents who taught me never to say "nigger." Even writing the word for this comment makes me feel queasy. But let's talk straight what both Democrats (i.e. the Clintons) and Republicans have done and are doing now when they call Obama elitist and arrogant. They are saying through easily understood code-words that he's an "uppity nigger" -- a term I heard thousands of times during my childhood. For closet racists to suggest other otherwise shows they think tolerant Americans are either stupid or inconsequential.

Because of the current GOP smear campaign against Obama, I added another reason to defeat McCain in November on my new nonprofit Web site, www.UnfitMcCain.com, as follows:

McCain promised in February not run a negative campaign. Then, five months later, rather than discuss important issues like high energy prices and rising unemployment, McCain and his handlers unleashed a scurrilous attack on Barack Obama's character, such as labeling him "arrogant" -- a substitute for "uppity" with racial overtones.

Another reason on UnfitMcCain.com's home page summarizes my investigation of "Songbird" McCain's behavior as a POW in North Vietnam. The facts-check shows that he distorted his so-called "heroic" war record and exploited it for political gain. Part of the information is based on my recent communications with a former POW.

If, after visiting UnfitMcCain.com, you agree with my findings and love America, please tell your friends and family about my Web site.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, lifelong registered Republican and former McCain supporter.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Racism against Kerry Posted by: Zenobia
» John F. Obama? Posted by: edgar1
» RE: acism against Kerry Posted by: Bibsisis
Rid AlterNet of pot-stirring GOP trolls.
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 4, 2008 2:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
AlterNet's post comment page says, "We also ask our readers to refrain from responding to posts by people who only want to derail the conversation with conservative talking points. Please report these comments; do not respond."

I suggest before reporting pot-stirring GOP trolls, we respond to their remarks with the title "Unworthy of comment" -- or "U.C." for short. In the comment text box, to save time, enter "Ditto."

By the way, try commenting on conservative blogs. If you're liberal or progressive, they will ban you in a heartbeat!

Never forget who the enemy is, folks. It ain't Barack Obama or the Democratic Party. Our foe is the rightwing GOP whose operatives (trolls) have been infecting AlterNet threads with contemptuous abandon.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Rid AlterNet of book-peddlers Posted by: Illiteratilumen
Fraud at the Polls
Posted by: Tom Degan on Aug 4, 2008 3:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here's a certainty: In order for Barack Obama to have so much as a slender chance of winning this thing in November, the Democrats will have to register at least two million people.

The GOP stole the last two presidential elections by disenfranchising thousands of black people in Florida (2000) and Ohio (2004). They plan on doing it again in 2008. Count on it.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Coming of Age In The Sixties

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fraud at the Polls Posted by: opmoc
» RE: Fraud at the Polls Posted by: Lincoln fan
Dixie strategy
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on Aug 4, 2008 3:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Obama diddles in S.C., FL, GA, VA with "hope" of victory in those states, let me remind him that he is losing white and working family members votes by the minute. This guy simply does not understand that you cannot please everyone. This is a pissed off nation and it begs for a response to 28 years of neoconservative horseshit commencing with Reagan/Bush that has evolved to the most cravenly despotic tyranny in free world history. What the hell is he waiting for? Or is he scared shitless that if he speaks he will get killed. He is not the answer to anything this nation faces, nor is McCain and that is one fucked up reality to digest in 2008!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» 50-state strategy Posted by: brunowe
» RE: Dixie strategy Posted by: djnoll
Empowerment
Posted by: robchapman on Aug 4, 2008 3:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Barack Obama has spent his life's work in devising ways to empower the average citizen and to making the system work for the benefit of the masses.

Voting is the essential and basic step toward this goal.

If the Democratic Party becomes the vehicle through which the American public reconnects with the political system and begin to hold officials and malefactors accountable, then Obama will have served a noble and historic purpose.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: mpowerment Posted by: VZEQICVA
Historic Or Ego
Posted by: thebeerdoctor on Aug 4, 2008 3:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I had a conversation with a senior black man who told me that much of Senator Obama's support was skin deep. "The white people who say they are with him", he instructed, "will be so until it gets time for the voting booth. The only way Obama can beat McCain is to have Hillary Clinton on the ticket. Black people are only 13% of the country. Obama needs the older white women to win. Hillary is his best chance to get their votes."
I thought about this, and despite the vehement objections of rabid Obama supporters (who seem to be becoming less enthusiastic as the campaign drags on), the old black man maybe correct. Obama has moved to the right (the news calls it the center) on most positions, so that Mrs. Clinton and the candidate on the same political page. A united Democratic party may be their best hope to win, especially now when it has been made clear that the McCain campaign is all about foaming up enough xenophobic paranoia (of whatever stripe) to make the voter vote against Obama, rather than a positive vote for McCain.
My old black friend also said that change has nothing to do with issues, that either candidate will protect the status quo. But the symbolism of a dark skin man and a woman in the White House? That is history. Only Senator Obama's ego could prevent him from seizing this opportunity.
I thought about this. Considering how his candidacy has changed positions for the sake of expediency, he just might pick Mrs. Clinton. Some of his supporters will loudly complain, but Obama will probably say something about his earlier criticisms of Senator Clinton as being misconstrued, in the light of "overheated rhetoric".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Historic Or Ego Posted by: VZEQICVA
Obama Volunteer, Working for US
Posted by: Purple Girl on Aug 4, 2008 4:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I volunteered for the Obama campaign in June.
I had voted for Kucinich in the Defuncted MI primary.Mainly for his populice message and Outrage & committment to hold this admin Legally responsilbe for their crimes.
Once the clinton machine was able to knock him out of the race- I put my full support behind Sen Obama. rhetorical Question - how is it when th eother candidates ran out of cash they quit, and why is she the only one crying for Debt relief? Realizing Now I was Suckered by th eClintons throughout the '90's and that Hillary is still a Neo Con Repug- disguised in a blue pantsuit- I will NOT contribute any money towards her Bill- she should have quit like all the rest, she would have saved herself the money & embarassment of becoming so desperate!even if Obama loses (of it is stolen again in Nov)Clinton will never get my Vote, She reeks the of Corp Stench which has ruined our country!
But it is neither Kucinich Nor Obama I am working for...It is US, It is my daughter and all the other kids who have Now been born into debt- about $16,000 in the hole with their first breath- not to mention born into a country I no longer recognize as the "land of the Free" America I was born into.
But I realize that liberal Dems can not successful wage this 'Revolution' alone, so I have been reaching out & talking politics with my White, middle age, religious Family & Friends and discussing all the things we have been told we do not agree on- We agree on a Lot. And trying to show it is not "Others' we need to fear & hate- Just those who tell US we should.
I for One miss the Old dictomy of the Real Dems/Real Republican debates on isses which concern every American- Not what concerns the Corps. Those old 'Fiscal Responsible', 'Small Gov't', Limited international interference were formidable Foes, but now seem like long lost old friends.
It is not just Repub's who have sold this country out- there are many cloaked in Blue who are just as much Corp operatives. It's time we work together to regain the America we were given and Promised!


Obama/Hagel '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fixers 2, Voters 0
Posted by: lorenbliss on Aug 4, 2008 4:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I cannot but admire the enthusiasm of Obama's campaigners -- Obama's vote for FISA and his new admission of support for offshore drilling (and thus his endorsement of the Oil Barony) not withstanding -- the fact remains that no voter registration campaign on earth can overcome the electronic tyranny of Diebold and the judicial tyranny of a corrupt Supreme Court. For those with short memories, the latter was demonstrated by ouster of President Gore in 2000, while the former was proven by the election thievery of 2004. Moreover, the anti-democracy forces are stronger now than they were four years ago: Bush has a total lock on the court, and the Congressional Democrats themselves just sabotaged an attempt to require verifiable ballots next November. Hence -- at least as far as I am concerned -- the entire election is a charade. I will vote, of course -- I will not dishonor those (including my ancestors) who literally shed their blood for voting rights. I will probably -- unless by some radical magick there's a viable socialist candidate on the ballot -- even vote for Obama. But I will expect nothing save more of what this country has methodically dealt people at my socioeconomic level ever since Big Business slew the New Deal: worsening impoverishment, more disappointment and further embitterment. My one joy is the fact I am old enough I will probably not live long enough to see the United States reduced to Slavecamp Nation and the Earth to a Global Gas Chamber.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Slavecamp Nation Posted by: Dboy
» Capacity Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Slavecamp Nation Posted by: lorenbliss
His votes will be disqualified
Posted by: citizenjoe on Aug 4, 2008 4:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Too bad the Republican Jim Crow voting machine will find as many ways to throw-out Obama's voters as Obama can find voters to register. And the repulsive Democrats will do nothing about it because they (rightly) fear to reveal that there is no more democracy in the USA than in Pakistan or Indonesia. Does anyone believe we have one citizen one vote or that we have not become totalitarian and an Empire? The Roman Empire had relatively free speech too- so what.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is Winnable
Posted by: Urstrly on Aug 4, 2008 5:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama's understanding of community organizing put him head and shoulders above the other Democratic candidates, and there's no reason why it can't carry him to victory in November.

The one piece of organizing that isn't in place, though, is response to the inevitable dirty tricks the Republicans will visit on voting lists and polling places as the election draws near. They are desperate, because they know they don't have the votes.

It's been estimated that Obama must win by a ten percent margin to protect against the shenanigans. If you're a lawyer, you can volunteer your services to help contest the inevitable challenges. But any voter can register other voters, and it's especially important in states like New Mexico, Colorado, Virginia, and Missouri that progressives get involved. That's why I think Obama will pick VA governor Tim Kaine or NM governor Janet Napolitano or maybe Missouri's Sen. Claire McCaskill as a running mate. They're from swing states, and they don't have nearly as much baggage as Clinton.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Kaine is anti-choice Posted by: Zenobia
» RE: This is Winnable Posted by: edgar1
If you think Obama is going to get a bigger voting turnout in his favor, THINK AGAIN !
Posted by: maxpayne on Aug 4, 2008 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In "red" states and even strong "red" areas of those "blue" states, despite polls showing Obama gaining, there are ongoing efforts by Big Gun (NRA), Big Religion, and the rest of the social rightwing fundie groups to bolster the turnout for Mccain. As a matter of fact, talk to most gun toters and bible thumpers and they'll blindly "worship" Mccain despite the severe economic blows dealt to them. They'll overlook the fact that Mccain angered the NRA more often than not and that up until recently Mccain would draw the line on religious bigots such as Pat Robertson and Jerry FARTwell. As long as Obama continues to take economic issues and even other issues such as the environment, civil rights/liberties and freedom, and product/consumer/worker safety issues off the table, he can count on LOSING and more likely going down in FLAMES perhaps to the point of not only losing as many as 50 states but making Walter Mondale and even George Mcgovern look like they were in close elections. And STOP blaming us Nader voters. Nader is a perfect symptom of everything that is wrong with the Democratic Party. The Democrats, not Nader, allowed themselves to be RAPED by the rightwing !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

STAY HOME!
Posted by: Godfather89 on Aug 4, 2008 6:07 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do not vote for either, because, I Obama will win without your vote, he as well as mccain care about the electoral vote. Your vote is worthless. He and john mccain are both two sides of the same coin they have the same monetary policy and beliefs in the war. Does it really matter who wins? Join RON PAUL's Revolution, he is the real change amongst the fabricated change these two "candidates" have.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Make your choice!!!
Posted by: jstepp590 on Aug 4, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we go again, liberals so busy fighting each other, negative with no solutions offered, denigrating Obama (who is at least trying to do something) that we can't get anything done and become our own worst enemies. If this keeps up the Democratic party will fall apart (again) and we will have McBush for another 4-8 yrs. Is that what everyone here is trying to do? Sounds like it reading some of these posts.

Do you think that in every team everyone agrees? That families always see eye to eye? What I'm reading here is a lot of neg from a bunch of ideological losers with an overblown sense of their own self importance and an overly simplistic world view. That would be fine if I at least saw enough sense for these differences to be set aside long enough to win the contest but I'm not even seeing that!

You can say what you want about Republicans but for whatever reason you care to mention they stick together to win. We have all seen the results of that for 8yrs! Enough already.

Obama moved to the center to win the election? Well duh! In case you haven't noticed not everyone in the country believes in the left agenda. There are a lot of conservative views out there (which aren't too different from the liberal view) that have been left behind by the stupidity, greed and arrogance of the Republicans. He needs those votes to help win. He is doing what he has to to win. Without victory there will be no power. Without power there will be no change.

Is anyone confused or not understand that formula? Or are you getting mad because I'm speaking truth and you don't like being talked to this way, like some petulant child? Tough! Pride is a sin, and a weakness.

So, you don't agree with some of his "new" viewpoints. Fine, understandable because they are not perfect any more than the world we live in is perfect. What they are, however, is the best chance we have of moving our country closer to the views we share. Not all of them, not all the way, but closer. These things do not happen overnight.

The alternative is McBush.

Everyone here needs to make a choice. Do we want to win with Obama as the only candidate with a realistic hope of winning or do we enjoy Republican misrule? Make your choice and then live it. If you can't do that then at least show respect to everyone here who is actively working towards the changes we all know need to happen by not negging out others. This site is about change, about progressive values and a lot of the supporters here are supporters the Democratic Party will need.

Make your choice. Are you the Republicans best supporters or are you liberal progressive Democrats? Winner, losers or whiners? The choice is yours. There is no in between, and elections, like football games, are won by inches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Make your choice!!! Posted by: Lincoln fan
» RE: Make your choice!!! Posted by: jstepp590
Hope For Indiana
Posted by: mishawaka on Aug 4, 2008 7:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I have told many people here, 2008 is more than a light year beyond 2004 when it comes to the presidential campaign. In 2004, we could not even get Kerry/Edwards yard signs. Now, in 2008, we still do not have yard signs but we have Obama organizers on the ground throughout our area.

Our local Democratic headquarters is also the regional headquarters for the "Campaign for Change", handling six counties in northern Indiana. The goal, just for our county, is 12,000 new registrations by October 6th. We already enjoy a Democratic majority in our county; the Obama registration effort will only increase that. Our job is to educate the new voters about everyone BUT Obama. The Obama staff will be following up with the people they register about Barack and his platform, but we (as the local Democratic Party) need to educate and inform these new voters about the choices they face locally.

I do not know if Obama will actually win Indiana. However, the fact that he is trying is incredibly impressive. Although I did not expect this level of activity here, one reason I supported Obama was the promise of a 50 state campaign. No more "swing state" B.S.! The length of the primary worried me that he may not have time to truly implement a nationwide campaign, but the campaign seems to have truly hit the ground running.

As Democrats, I think we need to keep our eye on the big picture. The important thing this November is to WIN. After eight years of George Bush, we need a change. Even if you have to hold your nose, vote for Obama. Better yet, vote a straight Democratic ticket. Volunteer at your local office or do what I advised some of my liberal friends to do. Go to the state Secretary of State's website, print off some voter registration forms and go door to door. That way you can register new voters without worry of any conflicts of conscience. We cannot succumb to the old Democratic circular firing squad. Let Obama get into office and THEN we can bitch. There really is no other way to go.

McCain=Bush. Bob Barr? And, I'm sorry, Ron Paul's revolution is over. I am not sure it even got started. Except for a few zealots with yard signs, his message never seemed to make it to the ballot box. The guy got less than 10% in his home state of Texas! Now I read comments about the "Ron Paul revolution"? Ron Paul went back to the House of Representatives. His race is run.

If you have been awake for the past eight years, you know in your heart what needs to be done this November. If you still cannot bring yourself to vote for or work for Obama, then please do not get in our way. We can get together and talk after November 4th.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Indiana and Ron Paul Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» I miss Ron Paul. Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Indiana and Ron Paul Posted by: mishawaka
» RE: Indiana and Ron Paul Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: Hope For Indiana Posted by: jstepp590
Right
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Aug 4, 2008 8:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LOL, well considering the only other choice is "McSame" he probably will because Lord knows we cant take for years of McSame.

JT
Ultimate Anonymity

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NO SUBSTANCE
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Aug 4, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Inspiring to read about all these hopeful folks getting out and drumming up support for Obama. However, his message has no substance. He is not all that different from the McCain crowd. More war, more military, no universal health care, no radical change in the economic structure of our country --- in short, nothing radical at all -- just the vague hint of a "promise" of change. Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich actually proposed radical and substantive changes that are necessary for our survival as a nation, but they were quickly marginalized. The democrats are using the fear of a McCain presidency to boost Obama, but unless Obama iterates some substantive policy changes, what's the point? No matter how hard they try to get out the vote, many are disgusted with Obama's cave in to the war machine and to the FISA bill, not to mention his lack of support for impeachment of the criminals now in office. Many will simply stay home, and many others will be voting for third party candidates or writing in Ron Paul or Dennis Kucinich. Obama had the opportunity to truly electrify the nations' voters, but he chose to go with the DNC line. Special interests are winning the day. One can only hope (faint though it may be) that the American People, that oft maligned mass of mindless consumers, will stand up and take to the streets to demand the change that is needed to take back the country from the bankers and the warmongers. Hey, maybe pigs really can fly!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NO SUBSTANCE Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: NO SUBSTANCE Posted by: edgeofnowhere
» RE: NO SUBSTANCE Posted by: jstepp590
» RE: NO SUBSTANCE Posted by: mgmyers79
» RE: NO SUBSTANCE Posted by: jstepp590