Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Bush's Fierce Global War of Denial

By Tom Engelhardt, Tomdispatch.com. Posted August 2, 2008.


The motto of the Bush administration might have been: Pay any price. Or, rather, make everyone else pay the price for us to remain in denial.
Advertisement

Send me a postcard, drop me a line,
Stating point of view.
Indicate precisely what you mean to say
Yours sincerely, Wasting Away.
-- the Beatles, "When I'm 64"

I set foot, so to speak, on this planet on July 20, 1944, not perhaps the best day of the century. It was, in fact, the day of the failed German officers' plot to assassinate Adolf Hitler.

My mother was a cartoonist. She was known in those years as "New York's girl caricaturist," or so she's called in a newspaper ad I still have, part of a war-bond drive in which your sizeable bond purchase was to buy her sketch of you. She had, sometime in the months before my birth, traveled by train, alone, the breadth of a mobilized but still peaceable American continent to visit Hollywood on assignment for some magazine to sketch the stars. I still have, on my wall, a photo of her in that year on the "deck" of a "pirate ship" on a Hollywood lot drawing one of those gloriously handsome matinee idols. Since I was then inside her, this is not exactly part of my memory bank. But that photo does tell me that, like him, she, too, was worth a sketch.

Certainly, it was appropriate that she drew the card announcing my birth. There I am in that announcement, barely born and already caricatured, a boy baby in nothing but diapers - except that, on my head, I'm wearing my father's dress military hat, the one I still have in the back of my closet, and, of course, I'm saluting. "A Big Hello -- From Thomas Moore Engelhardt," the card says. And thus was I officially recorded entering a world at war.

By then, my father, a major in the U.S. Army Air Corps and operations officer for the 1st Air Commando Group in Burma, had, I believe, been reassigned to the Pentagon. Normally a voluble man, for the rest of his life he remained remarkably silent on his wartime experiences.

I was, in other words, the late child of a late marriage. My father, who, just after Pearl Harbor, at age 35, volunteered for the military, was the sort of figure that the -- on average -- 26-year-old American soldiers of World War II would have referred to as "pops."

He, like my mother, departed this planet decades ago, and I'm still here. So think of this as... what? No longer, obviously, a big hello from Thomas Moore Engelhardt, nor -- quite yet -- a modest farewell, but perhaps a moderately late report from the one-man commission of me on the world of peace and war I've passed through since that first salute.

On Imagining Myself as Burnt Toast

Precisely what do I mean to say now that I'm just a couple of weeks into my 65th year on this planet?

Let me start this way: If, on the evening of October 22, 1962, you had told me that, in 2008, America's most formidable enemy would be Iran, I would have danced a jig. Well, maybe not a jig, but I'll tell you this: I would have been flabbergasted.

On that October evening, President John F. Kennedy went before the nation -- I heard him on radio -- to tell us all that Soviet missile sites were just then being prepared on the island of Cuba with "a nuclear strike capability against the Western Hemisphere." It was, he said, a "secret, swift and extraordinary buildup of communist missiles -- in an area well known to have a special and historical relationship to the United States and the nations of the Western Hemisphere." When fully operational, those nuclear-tipped weapons would reach "as far north as Hudson Bay, Canada, and as far south as Lima, Peru." I certainly knew what Hudson Bay, far to the north, meant for me.

"It shall be the policy of this nation," Kennedy added ominously, "to regard any nuclear missile launched from Cuba against any nation in the Western Hemisphere as an attack on the United States, requiring a full retaliatory response upon the Soviet Union." And he ended, in part, this way: "My fellow citizens: let no one doubt that this is a difficult and dangerous effort on which we have set out. No one can foresee precisely what course it will take or what costs or casualties will be incurred..."

No one could mistake the looming threat: Global nuclear war. Few of us listeners had seen the highly classified 1960 SIOP (Single Integrated Operational Plan) in which the U.S. military had made its preparations for a massive first strike of 3,200 nuclear weapons against the communist world. It was supposed to take out at least 130 cities, with estimated casualties approaching 300 million, but, even without access to that SIOP, we -- I -- knew well enough what might be coming. After all, I had seen versions of it, perfectly unclassified, in the movies, even if the power to destroy on a planetary scale was transposed to alien worlds, as in that science fiction blockbuster of 1955 "This Island Earth," or imputed to strange alien rays, or rampaging radioactive monsters. Now, here it was in real life, my life, without an obvious director, and the special effects were likely to be me, dead.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: bush, war on terror, cold war

Tom Engelhardt, editor of Tomdispatch.com, is co-founder of the American Empire Project and author of The End of Victory Culture.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Denial is cruel
Posted by: weathered on Aug 2, 2008 4:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it blocks the association between cause and effect.

What makes these Bush years so Ugly and egregious is the contortions MSM goes through to perpetuate the denial.

The next time you watch PBS or listen to NPR regard them for what they are;an accomplice to the crime and the criminals who comitted them in broad daylight.

Arrest Silverstein/Bushcon and heal or stay stuck in the Lie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"The message of 9/11" ? the DC Shepherd works for a Corporate Monopoly Wolf
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Aug 2, 2008 4:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One with blood money on its face.

By the way, what a feeble piece of incoherent fluff this piece on denial. One so full of denial itself.

I could dredge up the usual links proving 9/11 is an established coverup for one transparent 9/11 "war on terror" farce.

Why bother?

The phony left and our MSM echo chamber choir seem content to pretend trillion dollar war on a noun is just a matter of skin-deep philosophical dialectics and a temp puppet BushCo regime on the way out. That the “left” and the MSM have mostly clean hands on what’s left of “democracy” crushed at home and mass genocide pumped abroad for another dirty Fascist killing spree.

Talk about denial.

The most powerful coping mechanism of all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» OK, let 'em deny it all Posted by: willymack
Unfit McCain will be no different than Denial Dub-ya
Posted by: HughScott on Aug 2, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This comment is for first-time AlterNet visitors who want the truth about John McCain.

I just finished investigating his "heroic" POW record. You can read a summary on my new nonprofit Web site: www.UnfitMcCain.com

The home page banner says, "Six reasons why you should not vote for Sen. McCain in 2008" -- which are:

1. He will continue President Bush's belligerent foreign policy which led to the unjustified and unending Iraq War that has killed more than 4,000 U.S. military personnel and 100,000 Iraqi civilians, decimated our armed forces and added mega-billions to the national debt.

2. McCain has endorsed the failed Bush economic policies that are destroying the middleclass, causing jobs to go overseas, pushing homeowners into foreclosure and endangering the future of our offspring for decades to come.

3. McCain is America's "Number One Neocon" with direct ties to Bill Kristol's rightwing extremist oganization, Project for a New American Century (PNAC), which promoted regime change in Iraq before 9/11 and wants to dominate the world with U.S. military power.

4. During the 2008 presidential campaign, McCain showed he lacked the necessary integrity to be commander-in-chief by flip-flopping on major issues -- such as torture, off-shore drilling and the 2001 Bush tax cuts that favored America's wealthiest citizens.

5. McCain distorted his POW record and exploited it for political gain.

6. Finally, he promised in February not run a negative campaign. Then, five months later, rather than discuss important issues like high energy prices and rising unemployment, McCain and his handlers unleashed a scurrilous attack on Barack Obama's character, such as labeling him "arrogant" -- a substitute for "uppity" with racial overtones. Never mind that arrogance is a quintessential quality of anyone seeking to become the most powerful leader on Earth, including Senator McCain.

The fifth reason summarizes my facts-check of "Songbird" McCain's dishonorable behavior in North Vietnam. Part of the information is based on my recent communications with a former POW.

If you agree with my findings and love America, please tell your friends and family about UnfitMcCain.com.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam veteran, lifelong registered Republican and former McCain supporter

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America land of Denial! W for WRONG Bush!
Posted by: williameon on Aug 2, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Faux Media,
False Government,
False Selections,
False Wars.
Torture, Terrorize, Spy and a
Thousand other Lies!
The Big Squeeze
Blood for Oil.
Pay at the PUMP,
Exxon’s WAR Tax!

Parrots repeat endless:
Rovien
BU__! SH__!
Propagandists lie while our
Militia dies.

The Hunchback of Halliburton
With his Blood stained hands
Dead eye Dick
Does a Trick.
Shoots America in the Face
Every time he speaks
With a Shot Gun.

Where's the Sheriff?
Peeking in your window,
Tapping your Phone,
Never leaving you alone.
Corpirate Crimes-R-Us.
Keep the ignorant poor and enslaved
While the Rich play:
Spin the $5000 wine bottle and
Who's got the biggest yacht?
13 Million Millions in Debt!
To pay for
Tax cuts for Billionaires, Corpirate Welfare and Bailouts.
Totally unfair and totally unbalanced.
How wrong is it?
George W. Bush WRONG!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush's Mental Health
Posted by: david.model@senecac.on.ca on Aug 2, 2008 11:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George Bush’s denial is part of an overall pattern of behavior characterized as psychopathic. To be responsible for the deaths and suffering of so many people in Afghanistan, Iraq, secret prisons and in America itself, takes a special kind of person. His behavior can’t be explained by cognitive dissonance or self-denial since no mentally healthy human being would be able to live in peace with himself or function normally with so much guilt weighing him down.

I am not an expert in the field of psychiatry, but there is a test which can be applied to personality traits to ascertain the likelihood of psychopathy. Dr. Robert D. Hare, one of the foremost experts on psychopaths, developed the classical checklist of traits which determine the probability of a psychopathic personality. The test consists of 20 questions which can be answered either by “applies, “does not apply” or “applies somewhat” corresponding to an answer of zero, one or two. A score of 30 or higher is indicative of psychopathic tendencies.

One of the questions asks whether or not the person is a pathological liar. One obvious example of his lying relates to his emphatic insistence that Iraq had WMD. There are many other examples such as the time he appeared on Meet the Press with Tim Russert and falsely asserted that, “I got an honorable discharge and I did show up in Alabama” contrary to overwhelming evidence that he went AWOL.

Bush also scores a two on another trait, manipulative. Seymour Hersh, in an article in the New Yorker, referred to Bush’s intention to manipulate the public when he stated that, “The former intelligence official went on, ‘One of the reasons I left was my sense that they [Bush Administration] were using the intelligence from the CIA and other agencies only when it fit their agenda. They didn’t like the intelligence they were getting, and so they brought in people to write the stuff’.”

Lack of remorse or guilt is another trait which Bush possesses in great abundance. Professor Justin Frank, professor of psychiatry, notes in his book Bush on the Couch that “He disregards the pain he inflicts on Iraqi citizens, refusing to comment on civilian casualties”, and “Just before the March 20, 2003 speech announcing the commencement of bombing Iraq, Bush was captured on a White House monitor saying, ‘Feels good’.”

Bush also exhibits another trait, callousness or lack of empathy. One of the most disturbing example’s of Bush’s lack of empathy revealed itself when the about-to-be-executed killer Karla Faye Tucker, who had appealed to Bush for a stay of execution, appeared on the Larry King show. President Bush watched the show and, in discussing her appearance on the show, he responded contemptuously to King’s question about what would you say to Governor Bush with “please” Bush whimpers, his lips pursed in mock desperation, “don’t kill me”.

George W.’s inability to control his feelings is legendary. Many journalists, such as James Carney, Time Online Edition, Andrew Stephen, The Observer, Carole Coleman, EU Business, have referred to him as an “angry guy”, “short-fused”, and having a “fiery temper”.

Early behavioral problems are also indicative of psychopathic behavior. He once through a football through a grade three classroom window and often stuffed frogs with lit firecrackers and threw them in the air.

In Total, Bush scored a 32 out of 40 signifying that he may have psychopathic tendencies. Although most people have some of these traits, few people would score over thirty. There has been ongoing speculation about his intelligence but few comments about his mental health. I believe that his mental health is more relevant in explaining his actions as president.

http://www.stateofdarkness.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush's Mental Health Posted by: 4changenow
Bush isn't the only one psychopathic and in charge.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Aug 2, 2008 1:24 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Alex Jones knows they are a cabal of rich ruthless brilliant (some of them) psychopaths who want the world for themselves. They are close to doing part of it right here. They need to be removed by any means if we are to get our republic back. Otherwise it will become an empire that will be many times harder to overthrow before it runs its course. That could be centuries before it falls.
We need elements of the gov't including the military if we are going to take it back before world war III begins. Some believe the time period of 1914-1992 was a single conflict with hot and cold periods. We are in big trouble and it doesn't look good for us. Remember the voting apparatus is compromised too by them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reality Check?
Posted by: beautifulady2003 on Aug 2, 2008 4:49 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Interestingly, today I had a conversation with a gentleman from India about Americans being in denial about what we are, what America is, and what America does. I pointed out to him that we baby boomers were raised on a diet of nationalism that remains with us to this day, to the point where we are blind to reality. We were taught to believe that as Americans, we're better than anyone else, smarter than everyone else, our country is better, our morals are higher, and that in every respect America is the leader of the world, everyone envies us and wants to be "free" like us. America has closed its collective eyes to the rest of the world and has refused to learn and grow as a culture, to have an affinity or sense of fellowship with other races and cultures, and to tolerate belief systems that are not the same as ours.

My Indian friend responded that this has been the sentiment towards America for many years. America has become a legend in its own mind, he said, but unfortunately, the world sees us much more clearly. We yammer endlessly about peace and freedom but are seemingly always at war; we are well known for our aggression and narrow-mindedness. We hide our greed behind the old rhetoric about "making the world safe for democracy." We refuse to teach our children foreign languages (except for Spanish, and that's because so many Spanish speaking people come here to the US, not because we travel or interact extensively with Spanish speaking countries) or cultures. We arrogantly believe that other countries have nothing to offer us and cannot enrich us in any way,other than by offering cheap labor for consumer goods. Most Americans can't even find their way around on a map of the world. We have made ourselves ignorant of the goings-on of our fellow human beings. Maybe that makes them easier to conquer and kill. Come to think of it, America only seems to make war on poor, non-white, non-Christian countries, doesn't it?

Our denial hasn't ended; we're justifying our behavior now based on overblown stories of terrorists, phony oil shortages, and contrived economic collapse. But eventually, the denial must come to an end because reality always sinks in. Thing is, when it does America will be just another third world country run by a fascist dictator.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eality Check? Posted by: sirios
» RE: eality Check? Posted by: beautifulady2003
» RE: eality Check? Posted by: Dboy
» RE: eality Check? Posted by: beautifulady2003
State of Denial = State of the Union
Posted by: Quannah on Aug 3, 2008 11:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Although we, as a nation, have been in denial for many years, the extent of that denial has grown exponentially over the past eight years. This is an entire administration that has operated in a state of denial for the two terms of Bush. The cost of that denial has been higher than any of us could possibly have imagined before he began his occupation of the White House.

And the MSM and the majority of the American people have lived blissfully in that state of denial until just recently. It's difficult to maintain that state of denial when our grocery bills have doubled since last summer. When gas is over $4.00/gallon. When health care is even further out of reach and getting to be a luxury for only the wealthy. When our very homes are being taken from us, and we find the value of those homes falling like a lead balloon. When real income has declined to it's lowest point since the Great Depression. When the "official" unemployment number is now at 5.8%, but in real terms is between 10-15%.

It's hard to continue to be in denial when our checkbooks say otherwise. When the reality is finally hitting home, many people are waking up to the fact that we have been HAD by our own government, who allowed (or perpetrated) this war, the inflation, the unemployment, the mortgage crisis, the high energy costs that are breaking the backs of the American people.

I'm afraid that it's only going to get far worse before it gets better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: State of Denial = State of the Union Posted by: beautifulady2003