Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A Powerful Movement Puts Mothers at the Helm of Social Change

By Courtney E. Martin, AlterNet. Posted August 8, 2008.


The Maternal Is Political, a new anthology, explores the transformation of and challenges facing the motherhood movement.
bookcover
Advertisement

The public image of motherhood has certainly gotten a political makeover in the past decade or so. What started with all that punditry about "soccer moms" and "security moms" as the voters du jour in the 2000 and 2004 elections got real with the March for Women's Lives, during which radical moms pushed strollers alongside the dykes on bikes. Then Code Pink emerged as an anti-war force led in large part by angry moms.

Today all the buzz is about "mommybloggers," an unfortunate name for an explosion in women writing online about not just diaper brands and nanny worries but public policy, military spending and a million other topics. A new anthology edited by one such "mommyblogger," Shari MacDonald Strong, is just out on Seal Press, appropriately titled The Maternal Is Political: Women Writers at the Intersection of Motherhood and Social Change. It documents this fascinating shift -- from June Cleaver to Cindy Sheehan -- through essays by some of our time's greatest writers and politicians, including Anna Quindlen, Anne Lamott, Barbara Kingsolver, Nancy Pelosi and others.

AlterNet caught up with Shari MacDonald Strong between family vacations and laptop explosions to find out what this radical mom learned from putting together such an exquisitely written and deeply felt collection.

Courtney E. Martin: The mothers' movement is referred to frequently in these beautiful essays. For those who aren't familiar, can you define exactly what the mothers' movement really is?

Shari MacDonald Strong: I don't know anyone who can, actually. That's one of the biggest challenges facing the movement.

Does a mothers' movement exist? Absolutely. The phrase refers to the fact that over the last decade in the U.S. there has been an increasingly active and passionate effort on the part of mother-centric political groups, and on the part of mothers as individuals and as a broad political demographic, to increase awareness about the importance of mothers' work and to fight for legislation and representation that accurately reflects the needs, values and priorities of mothers in our society. This movement is impossible to define, however, because there is no single political leader, no self-proclaimed "Leader of the Moms," who is calling the shots; there is no one political organization that is dictating exactly what the needs, values and priorities must be for mothers in our society.

As movements go, the mothers' movement is a complex one -- one that is bringing about vital change on many different fronts at once. It's not as targeted as, say, the suffrage or civil rights movements. Countless moms are fighting together to bring about change in such areas as paid sick leave, health care coverage for all children, paid family leave -- something provided by every developed nation in the world except the U.S. -- the provision of quality childcare, equal pay for equal work particularly as it relates to mothers.

At the same time, many other mothers view different issues as being just as important as, or even more important than, these. The mothers' movement assumes that mothers are intelligent and passionate and discerning enough to decide for themselves what is for them the top priority and what they are willing -- especially amid the unending demands for clean laundry, hot meals, etc. -- to expend the energy, and put in the time, to fight for.

CEM: In the introduction you write, "Mothers carry a heavy enough burden without being told we need to do more in the political realm." It reminded me of the Marxist idea that the proletariat -- the working class -- was somehow going to have the energy to rise up and start a revolution, when really, they were totally exhausted after a long day's work. Is the mothers' movement one more example of women taking on too much of the burden?

SMS: Absolutely, it is. And at the same time, who else is going to do it? We've been waiting a long time, for example, for our government to "get" -- and to do something about -- the fact that women still don't get paid equally for the same work as men. Mothers make even fewer pennies on the dollar than single women do, and for the same work -- and single moms make the least of all. Who's going to fight the battle to change this picture, if not moms? Who else is going to notice the problem? It goes back to that old Women's Studies 101 issue of power: It's not just that people with power don't want to give it up; they're often quite clueless about what life is like for those with less.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: feminism, motherhood, motherhood movement, mommybloggers, maternal is political

Courtney E. Martin is the author of Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters: The Frightening New Normalcy of Hating Your Body. You can read more about her work at www.courtneyemartin.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Every time...
Posted by: Q30 on Aug 8, 2008 7:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...someone says "women still don't get paid equally for the same work as men", she (and it is usually a she) is saying "I'm a moron who refuses to take her own argument one step further." There's a similarly-sized gap in pay between straight women and lesbians, with lesbians being favored. Should we conclude that companies discriminate against straight women in favor of lesbians?

Women don't get paid equally for the same work(!) Why go through the trouble of outsourcing to India when there's a cheap workforce right outside the window? Why not have an all-female production team which can out-cheap all competition?

Because the claim is a canard. When you adjust for factors such as consecutive years in the workforce, years of experience, etc, the disparity in pay disappears. When you compare apples to apples (comparing men and women of matched qualifications are working in matched jobs) women earn as much as men do. The difference in pay goes bye-bye. But that doesn't make good propaganda, does it?

If one of your biggest issues is a load of bull, that doesn't help further the cause, does it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

creativity
Posted by: logic on Aug 8, 2008 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women in power scares the boys because their first women were their mothers and mothers say things like "share" and "be fair". Female creativity, and indicators there of, are soundly stomped on in the schools. Although infiltration is a worthy means of attack, the thought transition would be better addressed at the schools, with home support directives for familial integration of the concept that, "governing entails nurturance to be successful". Women are designed by nature to nurture. The frontal lobe of the brain which controls aggression grows considerably larger in females making females less likely to be aggressive and giving females the added power of thinking creatively.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: creativity Posted by: 23skidoo
JOEMAFLAGE
Posted by: JOEMAFLAGE on Aug 8, 2008 12:11 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is already pending legisaltion in many states that would help mothers attain many of these goals. Equal parentign legislation would put children first and take much of the burden placed on single mothers away so they could go out and have equal opportunity in the work place as thier counter parts. Our federal governemnt actually gives the courts incentives to rip the family apart and turn one parent into an ATM and the other a house slave. Title IV-D of the social security act is destroying our families and taking opportunites away from both parents. Find out more just check out my site
linked text
linked text
Its time to stop the conflict which tears our family structure apart and only benefits lawyers and the system. Equality in justice will help give women a better chance at equality in the workplace!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fair Fare Everywhere
Posted by: Big Daddy on Aug 8, 2008 1:09 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks Courtney for your Op-Ed piece- "The Maternal Is Political" sums it up well! Another recognized demographic seeking equality through politics!

As goes with any new movement, already prior stated- Motherhood is not well defined. It's not centered under a label. It has not a leader!

May I offer some suggestions? Myself, I'm a father! For years, we men, oops fathers, have dissembled, tripped, stumbled and bumbled in no particular direction in our attempt to make our claims of injustice, ironically, towards the same ends that mom's seek, only on different issues! We have fought vehemently, with all those opposed to us. May I dare say? You All! Moms!

The losers have been three groups, with the winners being two groups. The losers are both moms and dads and the underrepresented group called children! The winners have been lawyers and the political machine- whether called the courts, the legislature, or the executive branch leaders.

As we both toil, spending endless time and resources "bashing each other", has it occured to only dads that neither group (moms or dads) is getting anywhere? Again, let's not forget the kids! That, while government continues to increase taxes, devalue our earnings through inflation and continue to reign supreme in our lives, our households, and, over our children! Again, let's not forget the agent of debt- the attorneys, so employed to carry our message, whether in the courts or as officers of the various political branches. Have we all bought and sold their agenda? Their story? Their belief system?

History seems to so indicate! Whenever the people have discharged their duties to run government, thus annointing their leaders who usurp the very people's rights once thought unimpeachable, now lost!

May I talk a vote? Who amongst us is guilty of sitting back apathetically not carrying his/ her duty to run/ control government? I'm guilty, as a citizen, a man and a father! My guilt is only exceeded by my ignorance- I bought and sold their lie!

Today's men's/ father's movement has at its core the fundamental belief that it's mom's fault! No lie could be farther from the truth. At the core of the feminist agenda is that its men's fault. Again, no lie could be farther from the truth!

We have blossomed today, most affected by the 1960's. We emerged from our political obedience into the false belief that our freedom was in the discharging of our responsibility! Then when we had our freedoms usurped there was a governmental agent, a lawyer or a political movment poised to fill our minds with the rhetoric of hatred. Hatred for another demographic group. And thus, the polarization begins again! May I suggest, the protagonist and antagonist of these battles are both created "Straw Horses" of the most sinister kind!

For all of recorded humanity, humanity has oft found itself polarized at the beheast of its government and/ or its minions! To whom shall we lay this blame? In our foolishness, we blame each other, because they told us too! In our anger we fight each other! We target each other! And, thereby fuel the cycle of insanity by avoiding ever looking at ourselves!

May I suggest, that BOTH MOMS AND DADS need to take a candid individual look at, "how I am conducting myself?" I am for one- Guilty!

As we enter the second decade of our twenty-first century, may we start with an honest look at ourselves? Find that our greatest ally is our perceived enemy? And, seek to find ways to bridge our gaps? To work towards equality amongst all of our polarized demographic concerns?

Big Daddy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fair Fare Everywhere Posted by: CommonDreamer
» RE: Fair Fare Everywhere Posted by: Big Daddy
» RE: Fair Fare Everywhere Posted by: CommonDreamer
» RE: Fair Fare Everywhere Posted by: Big Daddy