Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

McCain Doesn't Have a Prayer

By Matt Taibbi, RollingStone.com. Posted July 28, 2008.


John McCain can't stand sucking up to the Christian right. Is this the end of the GOP's unholy alliance?
Advertisement

Phoenix, July 13th, Sunday morning. Thank God John McCain has declared that he wants to wallpaper the continent with new nuke plants, because now the chances are better that this wretched slab of hot, birdshit-covered asphalt they call a state will be blown to hell in an accident someday. I hate this place. Once the sun comes up on an Arizona weekend, nothing moves except the occasional elderly-piloted Buick floating boatlike in the direction of some hideous megachurch.

This morning I've come to one of those monstrosities, North Phoenix Baptist Church, to witness John McCain's halfhearted offensive in his battle to win over the Christian right. On the stump, McCain talks about God less than any Republican politician in recent memory -- certainly less than any Republican I've ever seen. The guy pitches a tent visible from a mile off whenever anyone so much as mentions the military; you can almost hear the dopamine surging into his bloodstream every time someone stands up in a town hall and begins a question by saying, "Hello, Senator, my husband was a Navy pilot. . . ." And he seems positively tumescent when talking about such horrors as Al Qaeda or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. But his basic stump speech doesn't contain a single line about God or religion. McCain is probably the first Republican in modern history to talk more about "green technology" than about his personal relationship with Jesus Christ.

While Barack Obama gives regular addresses at churches, where he comes off very like a preacher (right down to his natty blue suits and his lilting oratory), McCain's chosen stump locations are invariably VFW halls or factory sites -- where he tries to win over working-class crowds by telling them that their jobs aren't coming back. As the nominee of a party that has swept two straight elections by hawking cheap pieties and ramming one preposterous lie after another down the public's throat, McCain's agnostically bummerific public-speaking strategy is a curiosity, to say the least.


Here's the thing about John McCain, and it's never easy to tell whether this is a good quality or a bad one. He's a shitty liar. He may be willing to change his position on anything from immigration to torture to campaign finance at the drop of a hat to win votes, and he may have no problem aiming below the belt -- below the knees even -- to impugn an opponent's patriotism. But this is not a guy who can get up in front of a churchgoing crowd in Asscrack, Arkansas, and start weeping to Jesus. In fact, he appears to deeply resent the implication that he needs to genuflect to the baby savior at all. As in, "Hell, I already lived through five years of torture! You want me to do more?"

The Republican party returned to power at the beginning of this decade thanks to a brilliantly innovative political hybrid represented in its most advanced form by the Bush-Cheney ticket -- a high-tech engine of ruthless neocon capitalism wedded to a half-literate aristocrat dunce hiding his alcoholism in born-again Christian platitudes. Add corporate money to fundamentalist-Christian demographics in a country as dumb and superstitious as America, and you can vaporize a century's worth of Al Gores and John Kerrys.

But here's how fucked that seemingly unstoppable coalition is this time around, now that the ticket is headed by an aging Goldwaterite named John McCain: The candidate has only recently come around to the idea that the Republican nominee in the age of Bush and the evangelical ayatollahs has to go to church regularly. When asked recently if he is an evangelical Christian, McCain answered, "I attend church." When asked how often, he said, "Not as often as I should."

So in recent weeks, to prove his piety, McCain has taken to dragging himself out of bed on Sunday mornings to attend services at North Phoenix Baptist, not-so-subtly announcing his devotions to his traveling press. ("Yeah, they started telling us he was going to church about a month ago," one McCain-beat reporter chuckled to me on the Straight Talk Express. "Like, Oh, by the way, he's going to church again. At this address, if you want to check. . . .") Originally baptized an Episcopalian, McCain claims that he's been attending this Southern Baptist church for some 15 years, despite the fact that his 2007 congressional biography lists his faith as Episcopalian. But in a touching display of his apparent unwillingness to do absolutely anything to get elected, McCain still hasn't been baptized in his new church -- he's not born-again, in other words. Dude is holding out for some reason. Like he's afraid to lie to God. A politician, afraid to lie!

The marriage of fundamentalist Christianity and the conservative movement has been a powerful force in world affairs. It has been the best smoke screen the archpriests of supply-side economics could possibly have had, giving Wall Street a populist in with the very people victimized the most by their union-busting, deregulatory policies. It turned out, for decades, that Bible-thumping Americans didn't mind having their jobs shipped to China, so long as someone was worrying about the air supply to Terri Schiavo's brain lump. As political cons go, this was the ultimate gift that kept on giving.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: christian right, john mccain, election 2008

Matt Taibbi is a writer for Rolling Stone.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
re:
Posted by: CatDad on Jul 28, 2008 3:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Right can address McCain's problems with the Religious Right with the VP running mate....specifically, by choosing someone as vile as Mike Huckabee...a Southern Baptist minister and faux populist...whom the conned "values" voters would love....Even better, he would provide "impeachment insurance" for McCain....That is, the prospect of his becoming president would be so unpalatable that Congress would never impeach McCain....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: re: Posted by: Lauren
» RE: re: Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: re: Posted by: Lauren
» Duck........ Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: re: Posted by: CatDad
» RE: re: Posted by: Dboy
» RE: re: Posted by: arnmos
Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi.
Posted by: andabottleof_rum on Jul 28, 2008 3:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You again prove that you remain in the anal stage of psychosocial development, wanting to shit on others in your toddler-like temper tantrums. I admit the first paragraph was all I read; it was enough almost to make me vomit.

So you wish nuclear holocaust on the state of Arizona? How exactly do the sentiments you expressed in that first paragraph differ from O'Reilly's much-loathed statement about how terrorists may as well bomb San Francisco?

Take a good look in the mirror, Mr. Taibbi. You are the mirror image of infantile right-wing hate-mongering fanatics. And just like them, you think you're clever.

Well, keep up the mental masturbation. Your violent fantasies and flippant attacks on others clearly get you off in one sense or another. In fact even I sometimes look forward to opening up your latest screed to marvel at its astounding rottenness - in such small doses as I can tolerate. It piques that area of my mind that would be fascinated by witnessing a train wreck, or that causes me to glance aside when there is an accident along the highway, wondering if any injured or dead bodies are visible.

You've given this section of your mind free rein to permeate the rest of your thinking. So be it. At least you have a kind of courage: a boldness to allow yourself, probably against your better judgment, to be taken over by impulses that other people are socialized well enough to repress.

But it's a Faustian bargain. I can't help but imagine that behind your immature proclivity to shock others and act cool, you're miserable in all your vileness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The first paragraph was . . . Posted by: dustdevil
» RE: The first paragraph was . . . Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi. Posted by: weathered
» RE: Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi. Posted by: weathered
» RE: Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi. Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi. Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi. Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi. Posted by: GuitarBill
When the 'Right' says Wright, I think Hagee
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jul 28, 2008 4:06 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a Recovered Catholic born & raised in MI, White ,45 yr old Working class (previously called 'middleclass'),Female with a College degree,I understood Rev Wrights sermon clips the moment I heard them- regardless of the MSM intended Skew. So to confirm my suspecions about how they were misrepresented I went to the internet. Having lived in SF during the late '80's I saw how the Reagan & HW admins disregarded the potential for Epidemic proportions GRID/AIDS was developing into. What is worse creating Frankenstien or releasing Him?So regardless of how AIDS came about- It was allowed to become a national health issue.Only when it hit the White community did the Gov't begin to acknowledge it- Recklesss endangerment.
As for Whos 'Chickens' came home to roost, I also Know Americans demanded we get off Oil and the Big 3 build fuel Effiecnt Vehicles in the late '70s, But they refused.At least until the Japanese started kicking th eBig 3's asses in Sales. After that blink of an Eye- right back to Lead Sleds coming off wha twas left of the Detroit Assembly lines. I remeber the Iran Hostage Crisis, the Iran Contra Scandal hearings....I knew exactly Who's chickens had come home to shit on, attack American cities.
Then I pulled Up Hagee- a True meglomaniac with serious Sociopathic Tendencies. Pre- emptively strike Iran ("Bomb bomb bomb Iran" Son Of Cain or the Cheney in Drag candidate "Obliterate Iran"). Setting off 'Armegeddon' and the delusional 'Rapture' while Lieberman stands behind him on the stage..This man and his fiends in Office are the REAL Threat to both national and International Security.
So when ever one of their mindless mouth pieces refer to the 'Wright controversy' I think 'Sociopath Hagee'. No doubt Rev Wright was laid upon the Alter of misinormed and misguided Public opinion to spare the succubus Hagee Revelations.Hagee the Heretic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

adolescent writing with a bad sense of tactics
Posted by: kenhymes on Jul 28, 2008 5:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of writing does nothing to help anyone, and it doesn't even qualify as good investigative reporting, because the author has made no attempt to go beneath the surface of institutions and communities he loathes instinctively. Churches are complicated places, and until the left actually shows some curiosity about what's going on, rather than writing all those people off as subhuman lunatics, progressive politics are doomed in the US. The left is in a good position to peel off a huge chunk of Jesus-followers, and forge a powerful coalition... but it generally can't stand to be in the same room with people who don't share its cosmology. I suggest that Tabibi read up on American political history, specifically the history of leftist politics, and try to notice the concurrence of multi-religious coalitions with progressive victories.

Peace
Ken Hymes

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain's Problem
Posted by: Tom Degan on Jul 28, 2008 5:44 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You've got to feel some real degree of sympathy for poor ol' John McCain. The guy has totally sold out to the Christian right. He resembles the maverick, rugged individualist of the 2000 primaries not one bit.

Back in 2000, so underwhelmed was I with the potential Democratic ticket (I was still a Democrat then) I seriously considered supporting McCain - if only for a fleeting moment.

Look at the situation we find ourselves in: McCain is such a horrible candidate, Senator Obama is the most extraordinary candidate to come down the pike in over forty years. What gives?

The "pundits" have all sorts of phony excuses: Barack is untested; McCain has more "experience"; Obama is an "unknown quantity"....Bullshit! The only reason Barack
Obama isn't killing John McCain in the primaries is because he is a black man. Case closed. Let's stop kidding ourselves.

If we deny the White House to a vigorous young statesman who has the respect and admiration of the entire planet and hand it over to a senile old bobblehead, we're going to look like a nation of idiots. Seriously!

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
BARACK STAR!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McCain's Problem Posted by: paulo
» RE: McCain's Problem Posted by: tkwilson
» RE: McCain's Problem IS MULTIFACETED Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: Overstating Obama Posted by: davidg
» RE: McCain's Problem Posted by: Sissy
» RE: McCain's Problem Posted by: Lauren
» RE: McCain's Problem Posted by: tap17x
» RE: McCain's Problem Posted by: CatDad
The FAUXTIANS are an appendage of the Reptilian Party!
Posted by: williameon on Jul 28, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The FAUXTIANS are under Corpirate Control.

The Bored Again do exactly what the Collective tells them.
Ignorant,
Brainwashed and
Conditioned!
They’ve bought the Corpirate
Pie in the Sky!

Armageddon!

Sorry!
The 144,000 are going south to meet their maker.
There is nothing Christ like about them.
They are duped.

Where’s the Compassion?
Where’s the Peace?
Where’s the Love?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's McCain's biggest plus, Obama's biggest minus
Posted by: Moonray on Jul 28, 2008 6:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not even McBush is totally evil; his distaste for the knuckle-draggers on the religious right indicates a grain of good character still remains. Meanwhile, I am troubled by the pious religiosity of the better candidate, Obama. Let's hope his self-proclaimed gullibility is merely another shrewd political ploy like his political embrace of Hillary Clinton and will not linger long after he's elected.

If anything President Obama needs to marshal the forces of reason to pry loose the grip of the corrupt religious establishment on our nation's government -- one grimy finger at a time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi.
Posted by: Kevin S. on Jul 28, 2008 6:22 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I agree with Taibbi's politics and his anger, but andabottleof_rum is right: all the references to sodomy and excrement distract.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very dignified, Mr. Taibbi. Posted by: helenwheels
None of This Matters
Posted by: madmac10 on Jul 28, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain can trot harrumphing along in this grotesque pantomime until election day for all he cares. As long as he keeps up the appearance that there are enough votes to take him over the top, then hopefully another stolen election won't stir up the people who are either too uneducated or too fundamentalist or too frightened. And the rest of us, well, even if we do manage to figure out how he rigged this one, what are we going to do about it? He knows what we'll do, but he'll keep playing the game nonetheless.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McCain is Not Well I Suspect
Posted by: drricklippin on Jul 28, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I actually believe Sen McCain probably has age related early CNS dementia

(But that IS NOT AN OFFICIAL DIAGNOSIS. Since I don't do tele-diagnoses on anyone!)

Just what we need- Another disabled President who likes miltary might!


Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton,Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: McCain is Not Well I Suspect Posted by: drricklippin
» RE: McCain is Not Well I Suspect Posted by: drricklippin
But Mccain has the support of Big Media and thanks to Obama WEAKENING his base,
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 28, 2008 7:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the GOP can once again count on DEPRESSED voter turnout on the Democratic side ! Or for that matter the fact that many of us are VERY VERY VERY PISSED OFF BEYOND SANITY that we'll purposely SHOOT ourselves out and vote 3rd party !

P.S.: If Obama does win and he turns around 180 and goes progressive/liberal all the way and even takes back his pandering-to-the-right votes, my wife and I will write him a very sincerely letter of apology and gratitude.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

WARNING: Do not underestimate the McCain campaign machine!
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 28, 2008 7:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Forget evangelical Christians. It will be GOP dirty tricks that gets Senator McCain elected in November.

Case at point: McCain's reckless assertion that suggests Barack Obama is a traitor because "he would rather lose a war than lose an election."

Another McCain TV ad blames Obama for high gasoline prices without saying how he caused the rise.

This is just the beginning, folks. Stand by for the dirtiest GOP campaign in U.S. political history. If you think John McBush won't not use the worst tricks in Karl Rove's playbook, think again.

Facing a torrent of GOP smears, the ONLY way Obama can win in November is by making Senator Clinton his running mate. And I have never been a Hillary fan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» I don't Hugh, but.. Posted by: edith
» By the same token... Posted by: Gungneir
Phoenix parking lot
Posted by: mrsanfran on Jul 28, 2008 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oh Matt, how classic. This is a pathetic excuse of a city. I have lived in the suburbs of SE Phoenix for the last 4 years via Callifornia. What a mistake. I pray I am out of here before that nuke levels the parking lot. The Real Estate prices have collapsed do to the subprime and I am stuck for the time being. Great article. McCain does not have a prayer. This will be a blow out come November.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Phoenix parking lot Posted by: edith
» RE: Phoenix parking lot Posted by: animalleaderisgreat
THE RIGHT WING'S PUPPET
Posted by: VZEQICVA on Jul 28, 2008 8:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
McCain doesn't believe a word he says. He is spoon fed by the right wing-nuts and goes out on the stage and does his act. Not exactly leadership material. But exactly what they want in the White House. Another George Bush. One more term with this current regime in place, calling the shots and our country will be history. McCain is still mad as hell about the 2000 election, and perhaps a little vindictive. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: THE RIGHT WING'S PUPPET Posted by: bobtr900
Thank you Matt Taibbi
Posted by: helenwheels on Jul 28, 2008 9:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I SO enjoyed reading this article! Taibbi touches on so many aspects of the duped bible-humpers and their failed attempt at taking over the country. My most favorite line:

"The Moral Majority Christians and the supply-side neocons always represented two of the worst and most vile impulses in the American character -- mass, willful ignorance and total, shameless greed."

How true. I also laughed my ass off at the description of Hagee and the irony of McLame's embracing someone so embarassing after criticizing Falwell, who as Taibbi said, was the true vote-getter. Not too bright.

McLame is a failure and not competent to be president, but I actually am happy to see that he has at least a teensy iota of 'realness' in his obvious distaste in having to act like a bible humper. This new trend, as Taibbi points out, of candidates being made to come off as god-crazy is a bad trend, indeed. I would never vote for McLame, but if he can be instrumental at all in breaking this pattern, then the man may have actually done some good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Thank you Matt Taibbi Posted by: dmmaze6
McCampaign
Posted by: Grousefeather on Jul 28, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
John McCain's entire campaign reminds me of the old cigarette advertisments, and I'm old enough to remember them.

Pall Malls: "travels the smoke farther, and they are mild."

Lucky Strike: "preferrd by nine out of ten doctors who smoke."

Camels: "I'd walk a mile for a camel."

The camparison...?

No matter how clever and creative the pitch men are, we all know the product is bad for us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I hope...
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jul 28, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...Taibbi is correct, that McCain doesn't have a chance. For a number of reasons, McCain does have a chance, despite Sen. Jim Bunning's(R-Ky) comments in that hearing the other day wherein he seemed to be convinced that the Repubs were going to lose.

McCain still has, to some extent, the always unpredictable religious right(RR) who may suddenly decide, at the last minute, that they must support him or doom and gloom will certainly prevail.

For example, any time from now on, the Pope, my religion, could suddenly weigh in and make some kind of statement that will throw the election to McCain. He did just that when Sen. Kerry ran for the presidency and that was all that was needed to tip more votes to Bush and his band of killers and perpetrators of the 'Culture of Death' for ever greater profits and ever more political power for the Repub party.

Some other right wing religious extremists could also weigh in and make ever stronger statements of support for McCain. That is all it would take to tip a close election.

The RR and their ever present Repub party voter disenfranchisement apparatus including their easily corruptible voting machines are quite enough to steal another election for the Repubs.

Should that happen the continuation of Repub party strategies will ensure the further devolution of our Constitution and what is left of our democracy.

More death will certainly follow, as well. More dead troops, Iraqis' and Afghanis' are sure to be the norm(while Bin Laden, who should be the real target, continues to roam free) and very possibly for many more years to come.

Great danger remains, b ecause their is no satisfying the RR or the Texas/Bush oil cartel or the Repub party profits cartel that has this entire nation in it's throat gripping death grasp, T Boone Pickens obfuscation notwithstanding. I know what he said but like the Pope, Falwell, Robertson, Hagee etc. it's what he/they DO/DOES that counts and I do not trust any of them.

What Taibbi does not.take into account is that they are all fundamentalist ideologues of one kind(business profits) or another(religious profits and ideology). So many people give the ideological predators of either the religious right or the business right insufficient 'credit' for their death dealing zeal and that is to our own downfall.

ALL zealots and ideologues are extremists and must be regarded as such. It doesn't matter whether they are bin Laden, or his counterparts in our culture, they are all dangerous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I hope... Posted by: Lauren
So what?
Posted by: willymack on Jul 28, 2008 9:56 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So mcboob doesn't like to suck up to religious right dementos, huh? Coulda fooled me. Maybe he's secretly an atheist. It that's so it'd be the ONLY good thing he's got going for himself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

J Meyer
Posted by: waterlily on Jul 28, 2008 10:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am so furious with what has been going on in this country the last 8+ years that reading this article MADE MY DAY!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wall Street may be hanging by a thread
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Jul 28, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It isn't just the sub-prime mess, or real estate, or gas prices. If you've been following the Fanny Mae crisis you'd know that short sellers have been running out of control in the system, and now the SEC feels that it has to do something about it. This problem is already decades old.

All the SEC has done in the past is to put a band aide on it. Now it's trying to do something and Wall Street is screaming bloody murder. It's all running out of control.

I don't see how the Administration is going to keep covering up these and other potetial time bombs before the election, any one of which will destroy the Republicans. I don't think even a lot of Republicans want to see McCain win. Another blowup and that's it for McCain.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Watch for who McCain's handler, vp will be.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Jul 28, 2008 12:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would find it very interesting who it will be. As for voting, well we had two previous presidential elections stolen from us and no significant changes have been made since. So who are the insane ones expecting a clean vote today? McCain would be ideal as the foil, just as GWBush was for Dick "the sphinx" Cheney was the string puller. So we may have this time around. I see a possible pattern forming.
Free and Fair elections? Go to Canada or Ukrain for that, this is the "Greatest Country on God's Green Earth" and we have our own types of 'elections.' Believe it! Or else.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Brain dead
Posted by: kenhymes on Jul 28, 2008 1:20 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There just seem to be so few people around in the InterLeft who are aware of local progressive politics, it's like you're all in your heads, blabbing away at each other. Here in Charlottesville, there is exactly ONE serious advocacy group which has achieved success in keeping homelessness and affordable housing in the papers and on the local government agenda... it's called IMPACT, and it's a coalition of churches. You just can't face the fact that churches are generally a force for nothing, occasionally a force for real change, and most vocally, but also only sporadically, a force for regression. Church is BIIIIIIIG. WAYYYYY bigger than the left. It's as politically diverse as the country at large. Wake up to that and deal with it intelligently, and there is some hope for major social and political change. Keep sticking your fingers in your ears and saying "the church is bad religion is a mental illness" and you might as well just give up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did you say brain dead?
Posted by: thinks4herself2008 on Jul 28, 2008 1:45 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Brain dead is voting for the party that is destroying the middle class (or working class), while making the privileged class and the oil companies wealthier than kings. Brain dead is claiming to be "pro life" while supporting (1) the war-loving party (that obviously enjoys even unnecessary wars of choice as they lust for oil) and (2) the death penalty (which is state-sanctioned murder and against a commandment). Brain dead is being outraged about gays being allowed the same right as everyone else to marry due to some "sanctity of marriage" belief, while engaging in divorce (highest in red states). Brain dead is selecting portions of the bible to follow while blatantly ignoring other sections and not seeing the hypocrisy in that. Brain dead is claiming to be a great patriot and yet nodding your head in agreement when BushCo trashes the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Brain dead is ignoring scientists and believing the GOP when they tout there's no such thing as global warming (because the oil companies tell them so). "Brain dead" is what I would call people who do not think for themselves, but instead follow the GOP like mindless sheeple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama isn't Sweating. He should.
Posted by: cori on Jul 28, 2008 1:54 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama isn't Sweating. He should.

They are aggressively peurging votes and are planing to steal the next election

In swing-state Colorado, the Republican Secretary of State conducted the biggest purge of voters in history, dumping a fifth of all registrations. Guess their color. In swing-state Florida, the state is refusing to accept about 85,000 new registrations from voter drives - overwhelming Black voters.

In swing state New Mexico, HALF of the Democrats of Mora, a dirt poor and overwhelmingly Hispanic county, found their registrations disappeared this year, courtesy of a Republican voting contractor.

In swing states Ohio and Nevada, new federal law is knocking out tens of thousands of voters who lost their homes to foreclosure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The following response to my comment on this thread deserves an initial posting. So here it is.
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 28, 2008 5:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have an acquaintance who is working for Obama in one of the northern swing states (I forget which one), and she says the indications are about 50/50 for Obama and McCain.

I would hate to believe that Americans are so ignorant and misinformed they would vote McCain into office, but it's certainly possible. Living in West Virginia, which I love in general, does expose me to a lot of people who are politically uninformed. One young friend asked me why someone would call Obama a "towelhead" if his father didn't come from Iraq! She'd heard that bit of nastiness from a waitress in the Cracker Barrel and was confused by it. Another friend said that he was concerned that Obama's race would be such an issue he wouldn't be able to accomplish anything if he were elected.

For the most part, the local people here are wonderful in many, many, many ways. I know at least a dozen of them I could call at 2:00 am for help who would be there for me without question. I don't have to lock my door when I go out of town! Everyone is friendly, and, in fact, they are quite open to strangers and seem to have no problem with diversity on a personal basis. For example, if a black person shows up at a party, he or she is treated like everyone else. But in casual conversation in an all-white group, jokes about blacks are not uncommon, racial or ethnic epithets are used without thinking, and fear of Islam is rampant. If the notion that Obama is Muslim is as wide-spread in Alabama, Georgia, Texas, and other places as it is here, McCain might still have more than a fighting chance.

Many of my co-workers have absolutely no comprehension of why I am not a Christian. My agnosticism is a complete mystery, and I've been told by a well-meaning friend that "someday" I might come to believe. When I said that would never happen, her response was, "Never say never." But if I told her that someday she might encounter reason and stop believing in her ancient mythology, she'd be sure to say, "Never" herself. I avoid that kind of confrontation with people I otherwise truly like because it's futile, and I find no need to point out their double standards when it comes to religion. However, this simply illlustrates the irrationality one might encounter in large areas of the US.

I haven't been to Alabama, so I can't pass judgement on that or most other states. But from what I've seen in West Virginia, there's definitely a great deal of ignorance, superstition, "clinging" to religion and guns, and fear of the unknown.

Matt Taibbi's use of scatalogical terms and sexual innuendos is probably offensive to a lot of readers - as indicated by several posters here. Actually, I have no problem with that personally. But I'm not sure I agree with his assessment of McCain's chances. I sincerely hope he is right, but I am still quite nervous about the "election," such as it is. The Republican machine may be slowed down, but it's not gone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Classic Taibbi
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 29, 2008 2:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nice! One of my favorite articles by Taibbi, or anyone on Alternet.

If only more articles were this edgy, entertaining, and to the point. Nice descriptions of US demographics.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The gun issue screwed the Dems, not "Family values"
Posted by: drp on Jul 29, 2008 5:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We have always had bible-thumping no-minds. In fact, less now than ever. But, as a practical matter, they could not swing national elections.

What really started things was the Brady bill and "assault weapons" ban in 1994. The gun issue will automatically cost you you 3-7% of the vote in most inland areas, enough to transfer control of the house and senate, and give the Repugs the presidency.

BTW, "assault weapons" are merely semiautomatic replicas of full-automantic rifles. Other than looking scary, they are no different from many deer rifles, except they shoot a much less-powerful round. We shouldn't have to keep educating you-all uneducated city-folk about this.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I don't like McCain but..
Posted by: xmvince on Jul 29, 2008 11:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't like McCain, but it's his choice what religion he chooses, if he chooses one at all. I'd rather have him not religious at all than too religious, because religion will cloud your head (as we can see with the terrorists).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Democrats winning means nothing if the win doesn't mean anything
Posted by: Sil on Jul 29, 2008 11:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I always expected the Democrats to win the Presidency in 2008, unless they were dumb enough to put a transparently corrupt and ambitious Hillary Clinton up as the nominee to send the Republicans to the polls en masse. Let's face it, if they can't win this year, the party needs to be put out of its misery on live television.

But Obama winning won't mean anything unless he does something meaningful with the victory, and I don't expect him to. Yes, he'll have a more responsible, less insane foreign policy, he won't embarrass the country and the people who aren't super-rich will get a slightly better deal.

But the USA has been undergoing this massive rightward swing since Reagan in 1980. The situation of today didn't happen overnight, and changing the party in the White House in 2008 won't correct it. When Clinton didn't work to undo the rightward shift of the previous 12 years once elected in 1992, instead just putting a smiley face on the situation as middle class wages stagnated under his watch too while globalization took off like never before, as soon as he was out, the Republicans pushed the country further right again. The only thing Clinton's term represented was an 8-year reprieve, and even that is certainly arguable.

It looks like this will happen again. Obama will put a more responsible Presidency in place, but he won't truly alter the fundamentals that need to change in the USA. Just listen to him. He's not going to stop trading with China, he's not going to pull out of NAFTA or the WTO, he's already said he's not too worried about FISA. He'll leave "residual forces" in Iraq, and nobody seems too curious about how many those are or what they will do. People will get a few crumbs under him, but the fundamental problems with the way we do business in the country, or conduct our foreign policy (the House of Cards strategy) will continue. Think how dysfunctional it is that, since 9/11, we have never had a serious national conversation about the many very real reasons for Middle Eastern anger towards the United States.

Once again, the Democrats are calculating exactly how little they can give to the American people and still retain the credibility to get people to vote for them under the theory that something will change when they're put in power. Nothing will, and when the Republicans get power again 4 or 8 years or however long after Obama takes office, nothing meaningful will have been done to change the effects of the insane decisions about foreign policy, trade, and economics by the previous Republican regimes. Then the next Republican crew actually will institute meaningful changes designed to turn the country into a tinpot dictatorship and a paradise for the top 1% at the expense of the bottom 99.

Voting in Obama is just delaying the inevitable for 4 or 8 years. Of course, it's less work to convince yourself that the Democratic Party is on your side and wants to help you, so their victory will probably be hailed as a sign of better things to come. It is, after all, a lot easier than actually doing the work that would need to be done to institute said needed change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

T