Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Is Starbucks a Sinking Ship?

By Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group. Posted July 25, 2008.


Starbucks is about to close 600 stores. It represents the excess that helped get us into the economic jam we face today.
Advertisement

WASHINGTON -- I'm not one to take lightly the loss of 12,000 jobs, especially when they come with good benefits such as health insurance and vacations for part-timers. Still, I'm finding it hard to suppress a bit of smugness over the downsizing of Starbucks, the ubiquitous coffee chain that put the word "latte" on everyone's lips.

By next week, the first of 600 stores Starbucks intends to close will be shuttered, a shrinkage necessitated by a drop in profits and an overall drift of purpose that seems to have thrown the company into the type of identity crisis some of its patrons try to work out while lounging at the cafe. My irritation is directed at neither the company's management nor its employees, but at the Starbucks culture. It's always annoyed the heck out of me.

Starbucks seems to be a place that carries a whiff of excess. In its own way, it has a lot in common with SUVs, hot tubs and television screens wide enough to fill a wall. That is, it represents the bit-by-bit extravagances that helped get us into the tight economic jam we find ourselves in today.

I never did develop the Starbucks habit, an addiction that can cost otherwise levelheaded people $25 or more per week. Years ago, I remember shocking a colleague when I told him I walked across street each morning to get coffee at a shop where the basic brew was a dime less than a comparable cup at the Starbucks just an elevator ride down from my office. I could have easily afforded the 50 cents extra per workweek, but what was the point? A brewed coffee was a brewed coffee. And since neither Starbucks espresso nor its various versions of "latte" bear much resemblance to the real things I've consumed in Italy (or even growing up in an Italian-American neighborhood), I never much cared for them. Eventually, I gave up buying coffee from a shop altogether. Not that there's anything wrong with that.

But the list of stores Starbucks is closing is a revelation. It shows that the company expanded to byways of America where I have no doubt that a decade ago, few would have deliberated the purchase of an expensive coffee, let alone an oddly named beverage. Take, for example, the store that is about to go dark in Triadelphia, W.Va.

That's near Wheeling, in the heart of an old steel and coal region that has struggled economically for what seems an eternity. "We haven't had retail (growth) in our county for 30 or 40 years now," says Greg Stewart, the development director for Ohio County.

Yet the county has succeeded recently in developing a major retail and office park, which has generated about 3,000 new jobs. Big-name discount department stores were lured in, and a big draw is Cabela's, a huge hunting, fishing and camping emporium. In 2007 when Starbucks wanted to move in, local officials had hoped the coffee shop would take a storefront in the "lifestyle center'' of the development, which features a theater and a pedestrian space. But the company chose a different spot in the development. And so, only a year after it opened, this is one of the first shops in the country that Starbucks will close.

Bridget Baker, a Starbucks spokeswoman, said she couldn't discuss store-by-store performance, nor would she disclose what the most popular purchase was in Triadelphia. She did volunteer that Starbucks offers more than 87,000 different "beverage combinations."

"Coffee seems to be something that's popular among a wide group of people," Baker says. "Obviously customers want us to be there. That's how we choose sites."

Still, the people of Ohio County aren't exactly latte liberals -- a political term that could not have been coined without Starbucks. The median household income there in 2005 was $34,199, according to the Census Bureau. Four years ago, the county voted overwhelmingly to re-elect President Bush. In this year's Democratic primary, Hillary Clinton won 58 percent of the vote against Barack Obama.

Some neighborhoods are fighting to keep their Starbucks. Included among them are Manhattan shops serving upscale offices and, according to The New York Times, a cafe in downtown Newark that has become a meeting spot and a symbol of resurgence in the city.

And Triadelphia does like coffee. Stewart says he's already in talks with other food purveyors and is hopeful about filling the storefront soon: "We'd love to just put Dunkin' Donuts right in that space."

Unglamorous, perhaps. But maybe good to the last drop.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, starbucks, economic crisis

Marie Cocco is a prize-winning syndicated columnist on political and cultural topics for The Washington Post Writers Group. She is a frequent commentator on national TV and radio shows.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Boo-Freakin'-Hoo!
Posted by: DivadNhoj on Jul 25, 2008 12:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It just boggles the mind how so many Americans whine about $4 gas yet don't mind forking over $5 for something they can make themselves.

Maybe the closures will get millions to think more of their economic priorities for a change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Super-Tall, Super-Grande, or Super-Dooper-Grande?
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 25, 2008 2:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When I went back to school, we used to study there. It was a nice alternative to the dusty, gloomy college library, and you could stay hopped-up on caffeine while you studied. Back in the mid-90s, it still had some of that hip, northwestern grunge vibe.

We all love to hate Starbucks these days for its corporate excesses, and the yuppies who feed the excesses. But I think it served its purpose back in the day.

It still does, more or less...It's a nice alternative to the bar scene, and you can sit down and drink your overpriced coffee in relative quiet, while you read Barnes & Nobles' magazines for free.

If their empire collapses, where will the next generation of geeks hang out? If they hang out at the deli, the construction workers will beat them up. If they go to DD, there's nowhere to sit, and the donut crowd is too square.

It's a bit much for these people to fight for a place that's been overcharging them all along, but I understand the sentiment they're clinging to...sort of...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

it is the idea
Posted by: richholland on Jul 25, 2008 3:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
in many cities in thailand Starbuck has his licensees.

Drinking my $2, special coffee that day in Chiang Mai I asked the nice couple of backpackers: is it not strange the girl serving us has to work all day for a cup of coffee"

The nice guy replied"if she isnt happy with her job she must look for another one.

Oh, there is nothing in the world like the fantastic american enthousiasme and optimisme.

A normal cup costs about 50 cents outside.
Widows and divorced mothers try to survive by cooking or selling coffee.
And they will not get a job in McDonald or Starbucks...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Overchoice
Posted by: war_on_tara on Jul 25, 2008 5:31 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to Starbucks once. It was too confusing. (For one thing, I don't speak pseudo-Italian, or is that some variant of Pig Latin?)

Starbucks reminds me of Alvin Toffler's crystal-ball book from the early '70s, "Future Shock," where he predicted the problem of "overchoice." I should re-read that because maybe Toffler predicted Starbucks itself.

But I see overchoice even at the drugstore - a friend asked me to get a tube of Aquafresh toothpaste and there were 8 different kinds.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How many ounces do you want? Posted by: drcyflowers
Starbucks: Part of the International Business Culture
Posted by: PerryBrass on Jul 25, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Starbucks is part of the international business culture. The same menu and the people consuming it are now seen all over the world. I went to one in Athens, AL, a small town near the Tennessee line: same menu and prices as in New York. With earnest kids working there, and the NY Times on sale. I could have been in Manhattan on a frosty fall morning. What I had a hard time figuring out was that the average wage in this part of Alabama was about 50 to 60% that of NY: so how were these people affording Starbucks? The answer: because it is part of a culture they identify with. We have hallowed out our lives so much, with so little in the center of them, that Starbucks and Louis Vuitton bags, Chanel sunglasses, and shallow "action" movies so identical you can come in in the middle of one and still figure out the plot, are what kids want: they aspire to this. So there is something reassuring to a lot of people about Starbucks: the prices may be ridiculous (I figured out that a chai latte costs them about 22 cents to make, retailing at $3.95), but the ambiance with its endless, international repetitions, is very comforting to the business class as it tries to make something out of life.
They also offer decent public restrooms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I certainly hope so
Posted by: Crazy H on Jul 25, 2008 9:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was in Seattle when Starbucks first started out. There was a shop just up the street - Stewart Brothers Coffee (Now "Seattle's Best Coffee" - same initials)

It was obvious from the start that SBC folks loved the coffee, while Starbucks just loved the bucks. They roast everything to a 'city roast' while some coffees - Sumatra for instance - is better with a lighter roast. But hey, that would cost more money to do, and it's a little harder to disguise second-rate beans when they've been lightly roasted.

They refused to tell people what was in their various "blends" - I found out from an ex-employee that the blends didn't have a set recipe, they just threw together whatever was on hand that week.

Not meant to be a plug for SBC, which is no longer owned by the Stewart brothers, rather a put-down for Starbucks. They put the 'con' in connoisseur. If they go down, this is one coffee addict who will be pissing on their grave. (high-caffeine level piss, at that ;-)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I certainly hope so Posted by: StumptownGeek
» RE: I certainly hope so Posted by: Crazy H
Fresh Brewed Bigotry?
Posted by: racetraitor on Jul 25, 2008 9:15 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
No one else feels the sly, urbane disrespect in the author's statement:
"But the list of stores Starbucks is closing is a revelation. It shows that the company expanded to byways of America where I have no doubt that a decade ago, few would have deliberated the purchase of an expensive coffee, let alone an oddly named beverage. Take, for example, the store that is about to go dark in Triadelphia, W.Va."?

Also, the whole 'consumerism' bit is quite passe at best and misdirected at worst in understanding the state of the economy. The, 'I didn't buy it, so I'm not to blame' reasoning really escapes me. The economy is in shambles because there are people who profit from and cater to our excesses, 'economic pushermen', if you will.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fresh Brewed Bigotry? Posted by: desidid
Local Shops suck
Posted by: gridlow on Jul 25, 2008 9:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I get payed more at starbucks than I did at the local coffe shop.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Coffee + added NoDoz = Starbucks
Posted by: logansafi on Jul 25, 2008 10:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't stand their stuff! Good riddance...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

article has wrong focus
Posted by: dennis.b.murphy on Jul 26, 2008 8:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First, I've never paid $7 or even $5 for coffee at a Starbucks- a standard 12oz cup is anywhere from $1.65 to $2.00 depending on location (airports typically cost more).

Frankly, I really enjoy a good cup of coffee- starbucks makes that on a broad scale. I agree that some small local shops (which I patronize when I know where they are and have the opportunity) can make even better coffee. But these shops are not always available or accessible. The other typical outlets are 7-Elevens and gas stations- both of which brew tepid bland brands overly hot and on the burner for too long- coffee is just NOT their focus. But a quick look at gas stations nearly anywhere there are Starbuck stores will show that these gas stations have elevated their game and attempt to make better coffee. Starbucks deserves credit for raising the quality of coffee taste and quality control across a broad spectrum of the market.

Where I think Starbuck's erred is their "license" stores. These are the small kiosks you find in some markets located inside places like Barnes&Noble or a local grocery store. Starbucks licensed the NAME of Starbucks and provides some training materials but the staff is not Starbucks staff and does not have the level of training and experience. I believe these outlets dilute the brand name. While it may seem like easy money to a Starbucks CFO, the net result is that people then think they get "Starbucks" anywhere- rather than a true Starbuck's store. (Think Schwinn and it's brand dilution into department stores rather than to be bought only at your local bike shop)

The expensive multi-dollar drinks? those are more labor intensive and ingredient intensive, hence the price tag. I don't drink them, but if someone wants to- more power to them.

I believe the TRUE failure here is not "starbucks as an example of consumer excess," rather- it is an example of short term shortsighted thinking on the part of Starbuck's management where the focus is on stock price and earnings per share, instead of the long term focus on steady productive output

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Speaking of smug
Posted by: YogiBear on Jul 26, 2008 8:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This kind of talk is the definition of smug:

I never did develop the Starbucks habit, an addiction that can cost otherwise levelheaded people $25 or more per week. Years ago, I remember shocking a colleague when I told him I walked across street each morning to get coffee at a shop where the basic brew was a dime less than a comparable cup at the Starbucks just an elevator ride down from my office. I could have easily afforded the 50 cents extra per workweek, but what was the point? A brewed coffee was a brewed coffee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm extravagant.
Posted by: else24@gmail.com on Jul 27, 2008 12:48 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I spend a little under one hundred bucks every three months to have five pounds of fresh roasted Kona shipped from the Big Island of Hawaii.

That's about $1.10 a day. For that I get a thermos of fresh brewed Kona just the way I like it, every day. (I freeze it in approximately one-pound bags and bring it out as needed.)

There's also the cost of the burr-type coffee grinder and the coffee maker and the thermos, I guess.

I think I'm still paying less than the folks who stop at Starbucks every weekday on their way to work. And mine's ready when I step out of the shower.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good
Posted by: donl51 on Jul 28, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They went rampantly overboard w/ not only their offerings,...but do we really need a Starbucks on every freaking corner?? capitalism run amuck once again!.....there are ''other'' coffee shoppes, I'm not talking dunkin -donuts or your niegborhood convenienance store ,I'm talking the real mcCoy that's been around for years w/real good coffee at decent prices!!..double mocha /caramel w/ shot of hazelnut,decafinated latte??.....isn't coffee! I'ts an overly expensive joke!!....ever try a real!capuchino..or expresso? or a good cup of well made coffee? l'il cream w/natural sugar if you like?....Starbucks went waaayyyyy,overboard!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]