Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Big Pharma Pushes Drugs That Cause Conditions They Are Supposed to Prevent

By Martha Rosenberg, AlterNet. Posted July 24, 2008.


Yet again, women are the industry's main targets.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
The End of American Capitalism? 5 Short Takes on Where the Financial Crisis Might Be Headed

Democracy and Elections:
Democratic Election Protection Strategy's Missing Link: Electronic Vote Counts
Steven Rosenfeld

DrugReporter:
Marijuana Is Real Medicine
Paul Krassner

Election 2008:
What I Learned at the Sarah Palin Rally Before They Threw Me out
Linda Milazzo

Environment:
Corporations Have Big Plans to Profit from Global Warming
Jill Richardson

ForeignPolicy:
Chomsky: "If the U.S. Carries Out Terrorism, It Did Not Happen"
Subrata Ghoshroy

Health and Wellness:
Will the Economic Meltdown Undermine Interest in Health Care Reform?
Niko Karvounis

Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman

Immigration:
Tuition Becomes Battleground in Immigration Fight
Annette Fuentes

Media and Technology:
The Growth of Talking Points Memo: A Case Study in Independent Media
Joshua Micah Marshall

Movie Mix:
The "Battle in Seattle" and Beyond
Stuart Townsend

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Our Next President Will Transform the Supreme Court
Ellen Goodman

Rights and Liberties:
Robert Fisk: For the Muslim World, It Will Make No Difference Who Wins the Election
Amy Goodman, Juan Gonzalez

Sex and Relationships:
New Poll: Parents Overwhelmingly Support Age-Appropriate Sex Ed
Scott Swenson

War on Iraq:
The End of Iraq's "Awakening"?
Robert Dreyfuss

Water:
New Information Shows How Climate Change Will Affect Water

More stories by Martha Rosenberg

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Like gastroesophageal reflux and bipolar disease, osteopenia began to inflict millions when a drug to treat it was patented.

"Osteopenia, or the risk of developing osteoporosis, was concocted as a disease at a World Health Organization osteoporosis conference in Rome in 1992 that was sponsored by two drug companies and a drug company foundation," writes Susan Kelleher in the Seattle Times.

Using the bone density measurements or "T scores" of a 30-year-old woman as a standard, the new condition, osteopenia, had "boundaries so broad they include more than half of all women over 50," writes Kelleher. And it didn't hurt that 10,000 bone density measuring machines appeared in doctors' offices to detect the new disease -- only 750 existed in 1995 -- many owned and financed by Merck, whose anti-bone-thinning drug Fosamax came online in 1995.

No wonder doctor visits for thinning bones increased by 5 million from 1994 to 2003, according to the Associated Press.

Of course, selling "prevention" to at-risk patients is a pharma gold mine.

It keeps patients on meds for decades through fear, alarmist marketing and after-this-because-of-this reasoning -- since a patient doesn't know if she would have gotten the disease anyway.

So even when reports of Fosamax-related jaw problems called osteonecrosis surfaced -- 1,000 cases have been documented -- and even when a study in the Archives of Internal Medicine this year found that Fosamax doubled women's risk of irregular heartbeat, which can cause clots and strokes, few doubted its primary action of protecting women's bones.

But now, like hormone replacement therapy, which also exploited women's fear of aging and social marginalization, Fosamax appears to cause the conditions it's supposed to prevent.

Since 2006, articles in the New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Orthopedic Trauma, Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Aging Clinical and Experimental Research have suggested the anti-bone turnover action of bisphosphonate drugs like Fosamax can in some cases cause fractures.

Oops.

While preventing bone loss that is caused by the process of bone turnover or remodeling, bisphosphonate drugs can fossilize and petrify a bone so it breaks spontaneously and with minimal trauma -- like chalk. It will not heal properly.

Thighbones of patients on bisphosphonates have "simply snapped while they were walking or standing," following "weeks or months of unexplained aching," reports the New York Times.

Like other fast-tracked-to-Wall-Street drugs that are effectively "tested" on the first users, adverse reports about bisphosphonates came from patients and practitioners long before they came from the FDA or manufacturers.

Bisphosphonate patients have documented excruciating pain from Fosamax since 2001 and GlaxoSmithKline's Boniva since 2006 on askapatient.com, many calling the drugs "poison" and saying they were forced into wheelchairs.

But only in March did the FDA alert health care professionals to the "severe, sometimes incapacitating, musculoskeletal pain" that bisphosphonate drugs could cause in their patients and caution them to consider whether musculoskeletal pain "might be caused by the drug" rather than the bone condition.

Not only is the pain that bisphosphonate patients report "not in their heads" -- imagine 1,257 men on askapatient.com saying their doc dismissed their constant pain and symptomology -- it is emblematic of what is really going on.

"There is actually bone death occurring," Dr. Phuli Cohan told Mallika Marshall, M.D., a medical reporter for Boston's WBZ-TV News in May. "People don't want to believe that this is happening, but it is a side effect of the medicine," she said.

Dr. David Hunter of New England Baptist Hospital concurs that bisphosphonates can cause "dead bone syndrome" and that patients should have a "drug holiday to allow bone cells to rejuvenate," reports Marshall.

Even drug reps on the industry chat room cafepharma are skeptical about bisphosphonates.

"They over-suppress the bone and 'may' cause subtrochanter fractures. ... It's the next hot button," wrote one anonymous poster on a thread titled "Is Boniva dead?" sparked by a rumor that Boniva pitchwoman Sally Fields had fallen and broken a bone.

Nor do bisphosphonates exit the body quickly when patients quit taking them, according to a 2006 study in the Journal of the American Medical Association -- rather, they remain for years.

(Patients "need not take costly bone-building drugs such as Fosamax for life to reap the medicine's protective benefits," was the News & Observer's upbeat interpretation of the drug's tenacity.)

Will bisphosphonates be the next hormone replacement therapy? Another example of women getting the diseases they were supposed to avoid, thanks to misogynistic marketing?

Is there a market for 10,000 used bone density measuring machines?

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: osteopenia, osteoporosis

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Capitalist Science
Posted by: talkville on Jul 24, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Enter the Fray at any point of the process. Corrupt research, corrupt development, corrupt marketing, corrupt selling. Science (and "scientists") in the service of profit and accumulation.

Listen to any ad for any pharmaceutical. The list of 'possible side-effects' far outstrips the ostensible "selling point" of the medication in question. Each of those 'possible side-effects' will generate, down-the-road, a pill or a therapy of its own. A near perfect self-perpetuating Method guaranteeing the survival of the Corporate Entity in question.

The alleviation of conditions in the Whole Human Being couldn't be further from the goals or Objects of such "Science". It is not the Cure which is sought; it is "The Fight for the Cure", the Interminable and guaranteed to never be achieved Fight is what drives the system. And it sells more and generates far more revenues.

Capitalist Science; Corrupt Science. Not-Science.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big Pharma is self-regulating and being insulated from effective regulation is like being given
Posted by: Suzon on Jul 24, 2008 4:22 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
a license to kill.

Too bad the victims of Big Pharma aren't the company directors and the political enablers. Here in the UK, the drug companies have never lost a major court case and the Serious Fraud Office never wins one.

As I have said elsewhere, it all goes back to the rapist-arsonist-thief and murderer William the Conquerer and the first royal charter he granted in 1067. That we are still in thrall to the baleful influences of the Norman-English empire is a little-known but rather impressive historical fact.

That's the ugly reality. We must restore the US Constitution.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big PhRMA IS TRULY A GREAT AMERICAN TRAGEDY
Posted by: drricklippin on Jul 24, 2008 4:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The behaviors of BigPhRMA,especially over the the past few decades,will be recorded in the history of American Medicine as a tragedy of monumental proportions.

I refer to this as "a miracle industry turned sour".

Through a combination mostly of hubris, arrogance,and greed one could almost make the case that this industry may actually be doing more harm than good?

Furtherore another very tragic aspect of this is the erosion of trust in all of medical science and the US federal agencies that are charged with protecting the health of US citizens. Ths trust will take decades (if ever) to recover.

Personally I strongly recommend that some CEO's of Big PhRMA be indicted and be sentenced to jail time. Fines and lawsuit settlements are simply not enough.

Very sad indeed,

Dr. Rick Lippin
Southampton, Pa

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big Pharma has been ruining America for decades so what's new?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 24, 2008 5:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author apparently forgot to mention the connection between Big Pharma and the phoney "war on drugs" which especially includes the ban on Cannabis which Big Pharma needed to enjoy the RIGGED market of petroleum everything. Remove the ban on Cannabis and the rights of Big Pharma to slap frivolous lawsuits and/or phoney "patents" on individual discoveries (natural or otherwise) and then they'll behave. Sorry, but even Ted Kennedy supported that phoney senior medical bill back in 2003 which basically gave Big Pharma even more power to RAPE the public's health.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

No Surprise, SOP for the Medical Industry
Posted by: WildCherrySkittles on Jul 24, 2008 5:58 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Same ol' same ol'. Fill in the blank: " ___ began to inflict millions when a drug to treat it was patented." This has gone one since the beginning of industrialized/institutional medicine.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Don't forget the lazy/ignorant who prescribe this...
Posted by: tlCampbell on Jul 24, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...nonsense either. It's these people who get paid astronomical wages in comparison to the average public who are helping to push people in the direction of buying into the Big Pharma propaganda.

This month, in fact, I'd gone in to report some problems that are commonly associated with hormone-related issues. Without a test or anything, I had three different brands of birth control shoved in my face "it fix, you buy!" If I hadn't been stubborn and demanded blood work first, which proved BC would have been worthless, I'd be shelling out who knows how much a month for something that I didn't need.

It's an outrageous system that needs to be fixed. Part of me wants to say let the dumb buy into it but sadly, we're all at least a little bit dumb if not only for the fact that the people we're supposed to turn to for wisdom, end up being the misleading crooks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Strange how....
Posted by: Marlena on Jul 24, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so few reports of the hormone replacement problems mention it is only one particular brand of synthetic hormone causes the problems, as it had s for decades...Premarin...in the latest study it was "Prem Pro" a drug combining Premarin and progestrone...the name "Premarin" is short for Pregnant Mare's Urine....the mares are kept constantly pregnant whith the help of hormones, and their urine is used as the basis for this drug...and people wonder @ the side effects? Plant estrogens have never had side effects anywhere near the levels of premarin or premarin based drugs

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Strange how.... Posted by: Sushi
Undrugged
Posted by: When In Doubt on Jul 24, 2008 6:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For over a week of nightly Katie Curic on CBS. I started clocking the pharmaceutical ads when I was irritated at the frquency.
The first night of clocking, there were 10 drug ads and two OTC drugs and ONE non drug ad in the about 27 minutes.
That held true for that week with maybe one or two fewer ads.
I decided that in truth they were making us sick as a way of increasing sales.
I stopped watching Katie.
I looked at other network programings and found they were about equal in their distribution of Pharma ads.

we have a Congress that is totally bought by industry. The FDA is on the payroll of Pharma.

You draw the conclusions.

Then Act.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Undrugged Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Undrugged Posted by: riley
» RE: Undrugged Posted by: mpreb658@earthlink.net
Over half of all Americans aged 60 and older have high blood pressure.
Posted by: opmoc on Jul 24, 2008 6:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is the definition of normal?

It would appear that having high blood pressure is good for you - because you get to live beyond the age of 60.

Yet how many people take drugs for it - and do the drugs cause more harm than good?

The best thing to do if you have high blood pressure is to change your diet and lifestyle, lose weight and do much more exercise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Weight loss Not Necessary Posted by: Gravitas
Big Pharma will gladly kill you too!
Posted by: stellabloo on Jul 24, 2008 7:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Myself, I avoid going to the doctor whenever possible. Fortunately I enjoy robust health. Coincidence?

OK so I've watched my mother deteriorating mentally and physically over the winter. Her foot became ulcerated and this went on for months. The dermatologist said it was her prescription and still this went on.

Finally I handed my brother the book "The Body Hunters" by Sonia Shah. Now she's off of one her medications and within two weeks, she sounds like a new woman. Apparently this medication was CAUSING restless-leg-syndrome (!) as well as the ulceration and Parkinson-like tremors and delirium.

This is after MONTHS of going back and forth between various specialists trying to find out what's wrong.

I could give some other examples here but this is the most recent and a perfect illustration of the article title IMHO.

One of the hallmarks of the american TV channels is the constant stream of drug commercials. Note the irony of "Drug-Free Amerika" in this context.

I caught a recent news story on prostrate cancer. Seems that lifestyle change can actually CHANGE YOUR GENES. That's right, you can CHANGE YOUR OWN GENES through lifestyle - something so radical that modern medicine can only aspire to! Most of you probably didn't catch that particular story, because coincidentally - or not - it pretty much died in the press immediately after it was released :(

Caveat emptor :(

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Big Pharma will gladly kill you too! sickofsleaze Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com
» Lamarckian bullsh*t Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: Lamarckian bullsh*t Posted by: sirios
» correction Posted by: bizeeb
» RE: Lamarckian bullsh*t Posted by: SpiderWoman
ba
Posted by: mnstra on Jul 24, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Try this one I get antidepressants for depression.I cant sleep due to its side effects then its Ambien ;then I get GERD due to the effects on the stomach of SSRIs for which nexium is prescribed.Great business these drug companies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Funny... Posted by: mjabele
alph
Posted by: cleopatra97 on Jul 24, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
yes, in another market opportunity, Viagra is being prescribed to women who have diminished sex drive as a side effect of their antidepressant pharmaceuticals. So our society is so screwed up that many women become depressed, pharma answers with a pill, and then a pill to fix the side effects of that pill, and so on and so on. i see dollars to drug companies, but not health or wellness for their victims.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sickofsleaze that's why
Posted by: ladybug1@carrollsweb.com on Jul 24, 2008 8:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I ALWAYS advise ANYONE who is taking ANY kind of medicine no matter how long they have been taking the med or how long it has been on the market ALWAYS LOOK IT UP ON THE INTERNET and find all of its side effects, its interaction with any other drugs you are taking.
Many drugs should not be taken at the same time certain other drugs are taken
Learn both drug's peak of action if it should not be taken with another drug.
Also be sure to learn if it should or not be taken with food.
For example, antibiotics should no be taken then drink milk, this nullifies the drug and nobody benefits except the doctor who prescribed it and the big pharma who made it
Also don't rush to be the first one to take the latest wonder drug foisted on an unsuspecting public.
I read some good advice Never take a drug till it has been in the market at least 5 years

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: sickofsleaze that's why Posted by: mpreb658@earthlink.net
BAN DRUG ADVERTISING AGAIN
Posted by: leafsong1 on Jul 24, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bad drugs wouldn't be such a problem without such good advertising.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big toxicity
Posted by: sirios on Jul 24, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These guys { big Pharma] are monsters. Not only do they manipulate us with endless advertising selling toxic waste,but regularly lobby against natural methods of healing. Has anyone put a drug compendium and a herbal text side by side? The drug text has a few sentences for the drugs use, and paragraphs of contra indications-side effects. the herb text has paragraphs of uses for each herb with little or NO side effects. Herbs do not operate outside or in opposition to the wholeness of the organism while simultaneously targeting the specific ailment. drugs on the other hand routinely disturb the wholness of the entity [ with sometimes deadly results] while effecting their target, or not. That said, drugs are amazing in life threatening situations and would be my first choice if ones vital signs are in danger. however for prevention and non life threatening healing, herbs, homeopathy and other natural modalities are by far my first choice

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Perfect Scapegoat
Posted by: Gravitas on Jul 24, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think pharma is disgusting and evil. But the American people like having the wool pulled over their eyes. I think taking pills makes them feel important. And lets not forget they have the perfect foil. Not in the specific case the author mentioned, but for almost everything else, Pharma just deflects attention away from its toxic side effects by pointing to obesity. Through a successful marketing campaign, obesity is at the root of all evils. Even the most critical thinker, when the media and Pharma get on the antiobesity high horse, never stops to question, they just join the bandwagon. No one even wants to know that almost all the risks of dangerous weight loss pills gets attributed to obesity in pharma conducted studies. Or that the researchers are in their back pocket. So pharma and polluters can kill us with impunity; obesity as the perfect scapegoat not only puts all the blame on the victim, but allows the crooks to make billions of them as well! Got to hand it to them.....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Medicate the CEOs
Posted by: emmas on Jul 24, 2008 9:05 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A lot of them probably have antisocial personality disorder. Unfortunately, as far as I know, axis II disorders, especially APD, are not particularly inclined to respond to medication.

I would, however, suggest four point restraints, and large quantities of thioridazine, olanzapine and haloperidol. The fatigue they'll experience from this combo will reduce their ability to function, which might prevent them from continuing to directly contribute to people's deaths (especially those in third world countries who are unable to obtain affordable HIV medication due to the TRIPS agreement).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Animal Testing
Posted by: Elmo409 on Jul 24, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hooray for the anti-testing crowd! They've helped to create a situation which makes us all participants in the long term epidemiological studies which show up effectiveness, toxicity, teratology, and miscellaneous side-effects. Woo hoo!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Animal Testing Posted by: Old Skeptic
This is part of the reason...
Posted by: JingleFae15 on Jul 24, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I prefer natural and holistic healing methods over drugs and medication. Drugs don't cure anything, and they can't make you healthier. People don't die from lack of drugs; they die from ignorance and lack of self-care.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Correction: Hormone Replacement THerapy does work
Posted by: scienceisnotconsensus on Jul 24, 2008 11:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Unlike these osteopenia drugs, hormone replacement therapy with bioidentical hormones does work and is supported by clinical trials and research. Bioidentical hormones cannot be patented. What the pharmaceutical industry tried to do is create synthetic hormones that can be patented and those synthetic hormones are dangerous and deadly.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» My mother is case in point... Posted by: Duncable
I reversed osteoporosis without drugs
Posted by: wireup on Jul 24, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The MDs wanted to put me on fosamax but I refused.

I walk a great deal - miles every day; take lots of vitamin D; use various supplements (calcium, magnesium, boron, etc. etc.) and herbs, and avoid all medications (I don't even keep aspirin in my home).

Recently had a bone scan and it shows an increase in bone density. I am no longer diagnosed as having osteoporosis!!!!

HOORAY!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

women are not the only targets
Posted by: fomented on Jul 24, 2008 12:03 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As far as I'm concerned the cholesterol drugs are the same because there is no long-term study that says it is terribly effective against heart disease. In fact, it decreases your CQ10 levels that fuel muscles---the heart is a muscle.

They put the fear of blockage into people and sold pills instead of less meat/animal fats, exercise and more plant food sources. Now, we see that SUGAR plays a role in cholesterol levels -- simple sugar effects levels.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Big Pharmas next death plan: Codex Alimentarius
Posted by: scienceisnotconsensus on Jul 24, 2008 1:16 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You all should learn about the WTO's and Big Pharma's next attempt to control the world's nutritional supplements and food. It's called Codex Alimentarius and it will go into law in 2009-2010.
Someone estimated it will cause the death of 3 billion people from starvation and another 2 billion deaths from vitamin deficiency.

Do some research Codex Alimentarius

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

LESS THAN 10% OF BIG PHARMA'S BUDGET GOES TO RESEARCH YET
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jul 24, 2008 5:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
they invariably end up with the patents from the research funded by the taxpayer. We need a government owned pharmaceutial house to make and distribute any successful developements created with our money.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America had a Trojan horse
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jul 24, 2008 9:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The academy/ university system was well established, by 1776. These institutions, were committed to imperialism, for they were the ones who taught the kings to be kings, the Royal's to be royal!!! The loyalists went under ground, and hid behind the scenes, in the frat houses, to indoctrinate, the children of influence, of which Pres. Bush, is a "SKULL & BONE"!!! The ACADEMY, controls all knowledge, accredits all teachers, and all approved leaders!!! Every department/ subject, is in line with all of the other ones, in order to achieve the same goal of building "UNIVERSAL CITY" The high tech tower of babel (ISIAH 14
:12-14) The academy has created an American royalty, with "DEGREES OF NOBILITY"!!!(What is your rank in the human food chain) How many people have to be sick at any given time, to keep the hospitals, and doctors... in business??? How many people have to die, in order to keep the funeral homes, and morticians in business??? How many crimes have to be committed, in order to keep prisons full, and the courts busy, to keep the lawyers, judges, and politicians feed??? OUT OF KAOS COMES ORDER!!! It's all part of the plan!!! Capitalism, and Darwinism has become Americas new religion!!! The academy, may have the knowledge of good and evil, but they just don't have the wisdom to tell the difference!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pharma and FDA's budget
Posted by: wireup on Jul 24, 2008 10:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did you know that a BIG part of FDA's budget is contributed by Pharma?

I'd call this a serious CONFLICT OF INTEREST. The regulated are paying the budget of the regulator!!!!

Do the research.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The FDA has killed more Americans than al-Qaeda..!
Posted by: TJColatrella on Jul 24, 2008 11:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The FDA has killed more Americans than al-Qaeda...VIOXX alone killed 10,000 and gave 100,000 heart attacks..!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

but remembers that cannabis is......
Posted by: dadanbetty on Jul 26, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
very, very bad...don't ever start thinking because you might get a fucking headache you selfish, greedy bastards out there making money off of "cannabis being bad for you" and making it against the law. Where are your souls???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pharma Money Cycle
Posted by: seaseal on Jul 28, 2008 11:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recent investigations show Pharma giving doctors between $25K and $45K a year to sell their drugs. This often comes in forms not reported as taxable.

Check out the president-elect of the American Psychiatric Association, found to have skipped some information on research about giving antidepressants to children: he left out that suicidality increased. Ooops. Then he neglected to mention that his "over $100,000" from the pharma that manufactured the antidepressant actually was $6 million. NYT has the story.

Most profitable medical situation: involuntary hospitalization. Only doctors able to give involuntary treatment: psychiatrists. If patients complain about the drug's effect--and keep in mind there are no side effects, only effects--the doctor merely prescribes more drugs. This is extremely lucrative. My friend's son is being forced to take sometimes as many as seven antipsychotic drugs a day.

I am seeing all the things they warned us about in high school about the Soviet Union-- especially the gulag treatments: locked "hospitals" in remote sites for people called dissidents--happening here now. Watch out.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Truth can set you Free
Posted by: chemicalhijack on Jul 29, 2008 9:22 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I think this article should go to every Judge and Psychiatrist in the Country!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

health practioner warned group of women about biophospenates drying out the bone
Posted by: barbs on Jul 29, 2008 3:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Teresa Heinz Kerry sponsors a free all day seminar for women/health each fall in Boston.
THREE years ago, one of the speakers ( an MD.and ND asked the audience members who were on 'fosamax' or its equivalent to raise their hand; almost 95% of the audience did....he then told us that these biophosphonates DRIED OUT THE BONES so that if/when you did have a fall/fracture, it couldn't heal properly and he warned about staying on them....my rheumatologist pooh-poohed it when I told him about it....
I recently developed GERD, probably from Fosamax, so now he's taken me off it!!!

Drugs are not thoroughly tested before FDA 'approval' and long term side effects become known when we the guinea pigs get sick.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

sickofitall
Posted by: mpreb658@earthlink.net on Jul 30, 2008 9:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My research on the bone drugs indicates they disrupt the body's process of removing old bone and replacing it with new bone. Bone strengthens with age, but with age, bone loss outpaces bone growth. However, the pills and shots create stiff, brittle bones, whereas natural bone is flexible. Data also suggest that those with higher bone density have a greater rate of fractures than those with less density. In addition, the major component of the drugs is an industrial chemical used mainly in laundry detergents and other cleaning products.

Here's another interesting note. A new "disease" is being created, which, of course, means a new drug is desirable. This new condition is precognitive disorder. In other words, you are in trouble if you have yet to experience dementia.

Two doctors in town whom I know of tried the same thing with some of their patients. Their phraseology was nearly identical, and thus it was easy to surmise a hot shot salesman had been around to tout sleep apnea, which requires special testing and equipment for the patient to use at night.

One more. A doctor kept wheeling into my examining room a small computerized machine, by which he determined every blood vessel in the upper half of my body was totally clogged. His remedy: Another blood pressure drug--at twice the normal dosage--and a doubling of one already being taken. I don't think I have gotten over the effects of that new drug, and I wonder why he didn't instead hustle me to the hospital for emergency help. I have since left him, suspecting him of sleeping with the drug companies. Incidentally, no one else seems to have heard of this machine, and I long ago threw away the pills.

As my present doctor says, I can only do what the numbers say. I am old enough to remember when they used their minds and common sense, usually arriving at a good outcome for their patients. Now, it seems, patients are sicker after seeing their doctors.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]