Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

The U.S. Economy Is Socialism for the Rich

By Michael Leon Guerrero, Movement Vision Lab. Posted July 24, 2008.


Free market capitalism in the United States is by no means "free." It's time we recognize this and move past the destructive neoliberal agenda.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Michael Leon Guerrero

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

This post is part of a larger document that was prepared for the Convening on Community Values in May 2008.

In the United States, far-Right Republicans and Democratic liberals alike have sold many people on the notion that the market should be the main force to drive the economy and define social relationships. They maintain that government should stay off people's backs and out of our wallets. They promote rugged individualism and consumerism couched in terms like "personal responsibility," "freedom" and "independence." "Greed is good!" was the mantra of Michael Douglas' character, Gordon Gecko, in the 1980s movie "Wall Street," and those became the words to live by in the '80s and '90s. The philosophy and value of greed was taken to heart by many a corporate CEO, and, over the past three decades, this twisted logic -- underlined by the values of individualism and the culture of consumerism -- has turned back the clock on human development with devastating consequences.

The Chicago Boys' Disaster

Naomi Klein's landmark work The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism summarizes the last 30 years of the neoliberal (aka neoconservative) project. These policies have had a stranglehold on the global economy for decades. But Klein argues persuasively that it is primarily in moments of societal or natural upheaval that capitalist extremists, trained by gurus like Milton Friedman at the University of Chicago, have been most able to impose their political and economic agenda. Even if a natural disaster didn't present itself, Friedman's disciples, like Kissinger, Nixon, Reagan, Bush and Clinton, had no problem wreaking their own violent havoc on vulnerable countries.

By now, the mantra of the "Chicago Boys" has become all too familiar: Eliminate regulations, cut taxes, slash public spending, privatize public services, etc. Their policies dominated the global political landscape, unraveling the gains of centuries of social movements, while a new global elite has been enriched beyond imagination. A handful of people have become super-wealthy, and megacorporations have become even bigger and more powerful.

"Free trade" policies and the loan sharks that have run the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have destroyed national economies. Millions of people have been forced into poverty, and entire communities have been displaced from the countryside. Multinationals and northern industrial nations siphon wealth from the developing countries. Those that migrate from their homelands to make a living in the north are greeted with walls, bullets and racism. In the United States, millions are homeless, unemployed, in prison, or one paycheck away from bankruptcy. The social wage has been beaten down to unsustainable levels -- real wages are lower now than they were 30 years ago. Yet the costs of fuel and raw materials have skyrocketed, causing worldwide food shortages. We have wiped out public budgets by eliminating taxes on those who profit most. Vital public infrastructure and services cannot meet basic needs like maintaining the levees in New Orleans and reconstructing the Gulf Coast, or controlling the devastating blazes in Southern California. Yet the majority of our federal budget sponsors the wars and occupation in the Middle East, the warehousing of generations of the poor and people of color, the witch hunt of immigrant refugees of U.S. foreign and trade policy, and the growing national debt.

Capitalism unchecked has given us Big Oil, Blood Diamonds, Enron and Halliburton. They have given us Afghanistan, Iraq, Guantanamo and the Wall of Death on the U.S.-Mexico border.

The rise of the neoliberal regime has occurred in the same era that we are experiencing the decline of the economic and political dominance of the United States empire. Scholar Immanuel Wallerstein observes that economically the United States has been losing its top economic position since the 1970s as other regional economies have expanded. The country is staring economic collapse in the face, driven by the bursting of the housing bubble. This bust is enough to make even billionaire George Soros nervous, arguing that there is a profound difference between this downturn and other recent ones:

... the current crisis marks the end of an era of credit expansion based on the dollar as the international reserve currency. The periodic crises were part of a larger boom-bust process. The current crisis is the culmination of a super-boom that has lasted for more than 60 years.

Soros argues that with the deregulation of the financial industry, many of the mechanisms put in place to withstand a significant bust cycle have been eliminated. The Federal Reserve and the government may no longer have the tools to stave off a recession.

Today, the United States is the leader in a number of shameful statistics: the highest percentage and total numbers of its population in prison, the highest consumption of the world's natural resources, the only industrialized nation without universal health care, the biggest military budget. It seems that the greatest product that the United States is capable of producing today is war, and this makes us a very dangerous country. Our primary role in the global community is as a mercenary army in the interests of big business.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: neoliberalism, economy, capitalism, market, free market, american dream

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The Author Hits it on the Nose ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jul 24, 2008 12:49 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And there are a couple of books that I can think of that prove it beyond doubt.

THE CONSERVATIVE NANNY STATE by Dean Baker.

Video
“Free Lunch: How the Wealthiest Americans Enrich Themselves at Government Expense (And Stick You with the Bill)”

Basically folks if you are not very wealthy you are going to pay for these billionaires to get even richer. The video is well worth watching.

As far as the author's vision for the future , good fing luck. The powers that be control both Democrats and Republicans. The Dems wouldn't even tax Hedge Fund Managers on their wages, giving them the 15% capital gains rate when mere working people are taxed more. Even Obama has reached into the Chicago School of Economics for his economic advisors. And McCain is even worse. Expect no relief for the middle class from either of these two.

If you want some economic or social justice get ready to fight ... after the election ... no matter who wins.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» ditto. Posted by: Coleman
A change in thinking
Posted by: michael1972 on Jul 24, 2008 1:39 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We the dumb down public have made the rich richer. The rich cannot succeed without the support of the people. As long as people are willing to continue to work for someone else and neglect the idea and spirit of being a entrepreneur, they will continue to see their quality of life diminish. If people are dumb enough to believe working for someone else will give them financial success, they will get what they deserve (used and abused).

The working force of America are sheep that make the rich richer. Every job we have is designed to produce more money for the rich and just enough for ourselves to survive. The following doesn't matter if you have a college degree or high school diploma. Both groups are in debt, and are one paycheck away from being homeless. Jobs are not designed to make you rich, they designed to produce wealth for the elite.

Socialism is Communism but at slower and more deceptive pace. Wither we are talking about welfare recipients or your average working class individual, both will put their hopes into someone (employment or welfare), to take care of them and their families.

If people are not willing to study or learn what it takes to be an entrepreneur (any type), then they have no one to blame but themselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Dumb Posted by: kepstein7777
» We don't need more slave like you Posted by: michael1972
» ??? Posted by: emmas
» RE: ??? means your confused Posted by: michael1972
» And who's killing those entrepeneurs? Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: A change in thinking Posted by: tink1969
» RE: A change in thinking Posted by: richholland
» RE: A change in thinking Posted by: michael1972
» RE: You're so full of shit, Mike. Posted by: michael1972
U.S. economy is FASCISM for Monopoly Corporate Crime
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on Jul 24, 2008 1:47 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For authors such as Guerrero at venues like Alternet to claim this is some unexpected recent "neoliberal" trend is beyond the pale.

Fascism is older than the private Ponzi scheme Federal Reserve Corp (not federal, no reserves) put in charge of the nation's money in 1913 under "progressive" puppet Woodrow Wilson who foisted the genocide of WW1 for his paymasters. And Fascism continues to claim victims via phony 9/11 "war on terror" even as corporate Washington PR lackies claim non-existent "capitalism" and "democracy" will win out in the end.

This is about a Corporate Monopoly State and its latest crash at the expense of the naive. All of it run by DC play-actors that do anything but represent the people.

For among the few elements that remain consistent over time are a gullible population and a dirty old ruling class that extorts any nation it can get and keep its hands on.

This is about what George Carlin called the "owners" and their patsies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good Luck
Posted by: Steve Adair on Jul 24, 2008 3:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don’t see “values shifting”. I spent my life in a factory as a union member. I understand that most of what I have today is because of my union membership in a system that supported the existence of unions. But, nearly every person I spent my working years with still thinks that the neo-liberal propaganda is “right on”. Even past union presidents and board members reject the notion of shifting left. I know people who have lost nearly everything because of the current economic crisis and they still vote for maintaining the status quo. Good luck.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good Luck Posted by: myanh44
» I fear you may be correct Posted by: PaulC
the sad thing is, people realize this
Posted by: SufiLizard on Jul 24, 2008 4:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I suspect a vast majority of Americans would agree with most of what this article has to say.

And yet, we keep electing people (from both parties unfortunately) who keep doing this to us.

I don't think Americans are inherently masochistic, but this speaks to the serious flaws in our system.

First and foremost, we need to break up the corporate media! No democracy can survive an ill-informed and misinformed populace. Even if we miraculously developed the "perfect" political system it wouldn't work without a functioning press.

My rigidly and staunchly Republican father complains about the same things with the disparity between rich and poor and the glamorization of greed and many of the same things we on the left lament -- yet he still continues to vote Republican and watch Fox News and buy into some of the craziest of the right-wing extremism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oxymoron: free & capitalism
Posted by: Geonomist on Jul 24, 2008 4:37 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There's no such thing as "free market capitalism". "Free" does not always mean "license". English has the two words - "liberty" and "license" - for a good reason. Capitalism - that partnership of elite and state - could not survive in a freed market. Meanwhile, it does quite well in this favored market, thanks to their nanny state. Muddled thinking about freedom keeps us hopelessly enslaved. Like Confuscius said, "he who defines the terms wins the argument." To rescue our land, reclaim our language.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For people such as EncinoM, gellero1, Libertarian Paternalist, etc ... who complain about socialism,
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 24, 2008 5:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it's amazing the rightwingers such as them actually "love" socialism for the uber-wealthy. This article, while not perfect, does a hell of a job reframing the issue. Most progressives, rank and file at least, should pick up from this article and take over from there.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Libertarians don't like socialism for anyone Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» RE: Nice diatribe Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
Good material, but --
Posted by: JPHickey on Jul 24, 2008 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you're at the bottom of the barrel right now (like me), some higher states of "enlightment" like open borders and equal rights and opportunites for everyone who wishes to come here outside our legal systems of immigration, isn't leading to warm and fuzzy feelings. In my case, being 66, a disabled veteran on a tiny pension, I doubt that Mr. Guerrero really knows what it's like to stand in line at food pantrys behind illegal aliens, or to have illegals take over clients from my little vacation property care sideline. Or to note that illegals are busy doing work that supposidly "Americans can't or won't do", which is just a fabricated rationale, and is resulting in further lowering of our own earnings.

I am indignant toward advantaged class "liberals" who are more interested in open borders, aka, which essentially result in a state of partial anarchy. For many of the advantaged class, law is good when it serves my interests, but should be ignored when it doesn't. Oh woe is me!

I agree with most of the rest, but people like me need to see a bit more largesse before illegals are given precidence over legal, qualified, and deserving citizens. Solidarity is nevery going to happen as long as those at the bottom are just thrown under the buss. Liberals are just as greedy as neocons, hence their loyalty to the status quo.

Though I greatly favor social democracy, I believe we need to take care of our own now, not just in some future fantacy of the idyllic future. 66 already, where will I be by the time the tides turn, if they ever do. My car needed repairs recently, and I didn't have the wherewithall to get it fixed. I managed to scramble around and come up with it, but that left me without enough to buy food for the next ten days. So how now brown cow? Solidarity remains a figment of the idealistic imagination. Awe shoot! Whatever happened to those good old fashioned bleeding-heart liberals, anyway?

Liberals, conservatives, and all who are in entrenched and advantaged situations need to wake up and smell the coffee! Remember Marie Antoinette!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good material, but -- Posted by: richholland
» RE: Good material, but -- Posted by: Steve Adair
Author is Wrong right out of the gate
Posted by: Phred42 on Jul 24, 2008 6:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"In the United States, far-Right Republicans and Democratic liberals alike have sold many people on the notion ..."

It was not the Democratic Liberals - It was the Democratic Conservatives... The Republican-lite crowd that lied to get elected. DLC & Blue Dogs mostly.

Sadly there are very few Liberal or Progressive Democrats in either House these days

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Want to see where lack of regulation gets you?
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Jul 24, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a look at this site:

businessjive.com

It turns out that small cap companies have been the target of naked shorting bear attacks. This is where the Bush Administration claims that all of these new jobs that were created come from. The attacks are blatantly illegal, but the SEC seems to have no idea what to do about it.

In case you think the stocks you own are "real", consider this: in a buyback attempt, Overstock.com found that half the overstock shares they bought on the open market were "counterfit". That just might include your stocks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Listen to the Chomsky lecture "Free Market Fantasies"
Posted by: fanny666 on Jul 24, 2008 9:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Free Market Fantasies

Free MP3 download.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a truly "Free Market" is...
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jul 24, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A truly "free market" does not depend upon subsidies think agribusiness, oil, coal, airlines, etc. It would allow them to experience the rise and fall of prices just like every other nation whose people are now fighting to put food on their tables.

A truly "free market" would not allow the consolidation of the media - which is actually supposed to hold up the light to the injustices that have been heaped upon the people over the last 30 years. You know the media should have actually held up the magnifying glass to expose Bush as the ex-drunk that has never successfully run a profitable corporation anywhere but into the ground - and if it weren't for daddy's political buddies picking up the pieces and moving him along, he would be just another drunken trust fund baby no one had ever really heard about.

A truly "free market" would not support the Military-Industrial-Complex with their Star-Wars Ideals for a Cold War that is over; along with weapons that don't,can't, and have never, never proven themselves to work. The mercenary complex would not have grown by leaps and bounds.

This housing bubble would never have grown the way that it did, nor as fast as it did without the dismantling of regulations, and the avarice of the rich that were clocking the dollars they could steal! Is that how a "free market" acts?

Please! These people have managed to convince the sheep (the followers of FOX and others) to believe that "those people" want to take away your "freedoms", when the reality is they are feeding at the trough of public money and pushing everyone else away!

As a tax payer I think not only should they go to jail, but they should personally forfeit the money they have scammed the tax-payers for!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Even conservatives agree that this economy has become socialist
Posted by: blogbooks on Jul 24, 2008 10:09 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
See the latest article from conservative geopolitical analyst J.R. Nyquist:

Link to article on Financial Sense website

Sample:

"The logic of late capitalism (the declining form of capitalism) calls for the elimination of all suffering (and therefore, the elimination of real growth). This program is the basis of latter-day social democracy, which opposes the market because pain and tragedy are normal to the market system. Social democracy wants a world without failing corporations or banks. It is no wonder, then, that step-by-step they have ringed the market with “protections.” Today’s social democrat (and compassionate conservative) wants the benefits of the market without the pain of market process. The Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises once wrote: “Men must choose between the market economy and socialism. They cannot evade deciding between these alternatives….” No pain, no gain.

So there you have it. A decision has been made (and nearly everyone agrees), that pain must be nationalized."

I wrote him a letter asking if a nation had ever been led directly into socialism by its most wealthy citizens and thus far have not received a response. Right now the socialist trends are being confined to the upper classes, but when the middle class really starts to feel the pain of this declining economy they will expect some of that socialist redistribution of wealth to come their way...

Welcome to socialist America, circa 2011.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Almost agree: nanotech? Posted by: bingahaba
» RE: Almost agree: nanotech? Posted by: BigRon
Citing Naomi Klein REALLY doesn't help
Posted by: BigRon on Jul 24, 2008 5:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First I read the rave reviews of "Disaster Capitalism", then I read the book itself, and frankly, it was a disappointment. It highlighted the massive cultural divide between the USA and... well, just about anywhere else. I'm no fan of Margaret Thatcher, even less so of her career-saving, unnecessary war in the Falklands. But for me Thatcherism was more than just something that happened a long way away: it happened right where I live. And that gives me an insight that's missing from Ms Klein's book. To comprehend Thatcherism, you have to understand what preceded it - and that was an economy reduced almost to ruins through being trapped too far to the left, where trades unions could - literally - do no wrong, and even had a hand in setting government policy. Democracy is like a set of scales: it can't work when ONE side (left OR right) has jammed the balance mechanism entirely in their favour.

Ms Klein's thesis seems to be that the right wing "exploited catastrophic circumstances" to promote their own agenda. I can see where that might happen in the USA - where the right, and its supporters, are considerably more organised as a single co-operative organism. Here in the UK, they're not (and I hope, never will be so!) The group that co-operated to "fix" the system in their own favour here - to the detriment of everyone else - was the far left (and in 1970's Britain "far left" meant WAY further left than anything the USA has) "Bashing the scales of democracy back into shape" was perhaps the one good thing that Thatcher achieved. That Ms Klein clearly (and totally) failed to understand this has largely destroyed her credibility in the UK. When she writes about things she understands... she's good. Maybe it would be a good idea if she restricted her future writing TO the stuff she knows about. The assumption that "because the UK and USA both speak the same language, they must be pretty much the same in every respect" is not only WRONG - but it's the kind of being wrong that I associate with the Republican Party. It's the kind of being wrong that led to the assumption that Iraqi's all harboured a secret desire to be as like Americans as they possibly could be. That the invasion would therefore be a "walk in the park."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Commondreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Jul 24, 2008 8:46 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And what amazes me most: These plutocrats have engineered the biggest scam - that they're better and brighter than the rest of us and they deserve their pay and worse, they deserve to rout the entire economy so they can destroy everything by raising prices and undoing sustainability....this includes housing, college, and everything else yuppie-hyped...and these same people are so brilliant that the U.S. ends up in this state? But yes, they are the only class who can screw up this badly and walk away with more money than you or I will make in a lifetime. Because only in America do they give and give again to those who least need it. It's only free to them...and free for them to rip off the rest of us. That's the true definition of a free market...which of course is controlled by neo fascist rabid capitalists; thus not free of influence; never has been, and never will be.

The only cure is progressive taxes that make it nearly impossible to rout the economy like this. It can be done. This involves stopping all write offs for CEO salaries, for options, for their perks...and upping the capital gains and income taxes for the top. Everything should be means tested. In addition there should be a reparations tax for the damages done by these greedy mercenaries - and that should be reinvested in society.

And if there were ever a reason to keep the "Paris Hilton" tax, this is it. That these horrid examples of humanity could pass along that much money to heirs along with their terrible values and terrifying stranglehold on democracy...it is too much to contemplate.

But only a strong candidate can take back America. This involves wresting control and money from those who stole from all of us over the last decades and did nothing with it but build inane monuments to themselves, gift already wealthy universities, and in general keep the money flowing to those least in need of it. A very few good ones at the top have not done this...but we now need to ensure that we have lots of good examples at the top because that's the area where there really is no excuse for bad behavior and no justification for greed, lack of morals, or damaging individualism. How they got away with it is beyond me....except they sold a bill of yuppie goods to regular people who can't afford anything near that...floated the bad loans overseas...and generally infected everything in existence with their poor values and lack of compassion.

Yes it is time to show that nothing in life is free - not even when you rob people blind...because if you do, then you don't have any more sheeple consumers...and then what? You're seeing it now. Thus, CEOs, you don't get something for nothing - and nothing is what you gave the consumers for a long time. Now, the bill is due and I hope we have a president soon who is brave enough to demand payment.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Through the Straits to the Ocean
Posted by: talkville on Jul 25, 2008 4:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not only in Economy; in society and culture, in political organization, in ideologic cohesion, in Solidarity and Discipline. Of course, that's a much smaller Group no?; maybe a couple of hundred families and hirelings. A perfect Stalinist Structure and well-constructed Web of Corporate and State interests.

For the rest of us? capitalism, competition neighbor with neighbor, worker with worker, gender with race, race with gender, class with both, survival of the fittest, dog-eat-dog, alpha male on challengers. The Top with a Left that is Right. The Bottom a Super-Collider of Atoms -- lots of Energy and no Mass; or lots of Mass and no Energy. Dissipating and cannibalizing each other.

Founded and developed as such; developed and found as such to this day. Name? "The System".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If U.S. Economy Is Socialism for the Rich...
Posted by: whiterabbit1 on Jul 25, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If the U.S. Economy Is Socialism for the Rich
the stop complaining and make yourself some money!

here's a start: http://tinyurl.com/5zk4xt

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Antonio Magalhaes
Posted by: antomaga on Jul 26, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
30 years ago I use to define capitalism and communism with 2 words: Capitalism as State communism(now labelled softly socialism)and Communism as State Communism. So little has changed because the heads are the same and only the hats are different...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]