comments_image -

CYBERPUNK: Eye Opener

How safe is the corrective eye surgery? A growing number of critics argue that the supposedly simple laser procedure isn't worth the potentially disasterous side effects.
 
 
LIKE THIS ARTICLE ?
Join our mailing list:

Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.

 
 
 
 

It was weird. One person in the office where I work had casually mentioned that he is looking into laser eye surgery -- the elective procedure that can correct nearsightedness through the use of a laser. Within 24 hours three other people -- in an office of a dozen -- said they too are checking out the procedure.

One co-worker confided to me that he is doing research on the possible dangers for his girlfriend, who's thinking about getting the treatment. Someone else commented, "I hear there's nothing wrong with the procedure. No side effects. It's very safe."

Indeed, for those of us who have long suffered glasses or contacts, this procedure almost seems too good to be true (even if "vision-corrective surgery" does sound vaguely futuristic). For a few grand, you no longer have to worry about putting on your disposables in the morning or some flying softball wrecking your $250 pair of Kenneth Coles. A clinic specializing in laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK), the latest refractive surgery technique, will slice open your corneas, flip up the tops, vaporize the excess tissue with some laser pulses, then flip the flaps back down as though your eyes were pieces of Tupperware (Understanding LASIK: www.lasersite.com/lasik/index.htm). A few hours later, you're back out on the street, enjoying your yuppie lifestyle once again, sharing with your pals another miraculous success of laser-sculpted 20/20 vision.

But as more and more people undergo this procedure, more stories of cases gone awry are appearing. Ron Link, executive director of the Surgical Eyes Foundation (www.surgicaleyes.org), a nonprofit watchdog group that keeps an eye on eye surgery, estimates he's gotten more than 1,000 testimonials from people whose quest for perfect vision yielded less-than-perfect results.

"There is a lot of frustration, for there is no plan B" for improving laser-botched vision, Link says. Some individuals' corneal surfaces heal in an irregular fashion that can no longer be adjusted for by the use of contacts or glasses. "It's very difficult to get back into contact lenses or glasses after refractive surgery," Link says. "You can see a little better, but not much."

Link formed the foundation himself after his own refractive eye surgery in 1995 left him unable to drive at night. He later found out that his family eye doctor, who had recommended the procedure, had gotten a hefty referral fee for Link's operation. After some research, Link found his case wasn't an isolated one, nor was the procedure foolproof. He created the Web site for other victims to share their experiences: "There was just no forum for people to discuss these things, people who have found that their life course has changed due to an elective surgery."

One doesn't need perfect vision to see what all these tales of woe add up to -- the Surgical Eyes site is filled with complaints of post-op glare, poor night vision, dryness of the eyes, swollen corneas, and cloudy vision. There's the physician who had the treatment done in 1996 only to have his right eye recede into an astigmatism; now, he reports, he needs to wear glasses over a pair of contacts, and he still experiences haze and sees flares around lights.

Then there's Gail, who suffered from inability to read signs or drive at night. She writes on the site:

I now know that much of my vision is gone forever. Never again can I walk in the mountains by moonlight, as contrast sensitivity has faded. I cannot work all day and stay up late into the evening reading the latest science-fiction novel or watching a movie. I cannot share driving all night with my spouse so that we can go skiing.... I spook real easy in dimly lit parking garages and won't meet friends for plays or concerts at night. My world has gotten very small.
Since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration approved the procedure in 1991, approximately 770,000 people have had LASIK surgery. Almost that many will get it this year. Although major mishaps are kept track of, people experiencing lesser symptoms aren't tabulated.

submit to reddit

-
Email
Print
Share
LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Advertisement
Most Read
Most Emailed
Most Discussed
On REDDIT
On DIGG
 
loading most read content ..
Advertisement
Fox Blames Obama for Manufactured "Gas Crisis," Even After Prices Fall

By Shauna Theel | Media Matters

 
 
Why Did the Associated Press Make an Anti-Choice 'Correction'?

By Robin Marty | RH Reality Check

 
 
Minimum Wage Not Enough for a 2-Bedroom Unit in Any State (Unless You Work Way More Than a 40-Hr Week)

By Staff | AlterNet

 
 
Minnesota Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board Will Investigate ALEC for Lobbying Violations

By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

 
 
Obama and Targeted Assassinations: Had Secret Kill List, Calls Killing American-Born Cleric "Easy Decision"

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Romney Excuse for Birther Trump Endorsement: I'm Running for Office and I Wanna Win!

By Adele M. Stan | AlterNet

 
 
Women's Center In New Orleans Destroyed By Arson, Third Incident in the South

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
US Productivity Up, Wages Stagnant

By Sarah Seltzer | AlterNet

 
 
Scott Walker's Recall Strategy: Avoid Anyone Who Isn't A Walker Voter Already

By Laura Clawson | Daily Kos

 
 
Radioactive Bluefin Tuna Contaminated by Fukishima Reaches US Shores

By Agence France-Presse

 
 
 
 
 
loading ...
POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
 
[ page served from web 1 ]