Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Speech of the Week - Gore's Energy Challenge: 'The Future of Human Civilization Is at Stake'

By Al Gore, AlterNet. Posted July 22, 2008.


I challenge our nation to commit to producing 100 percent of our electricity from renewable energy and clean carbon-free sources within 10 years.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Al Gore

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's note: MoveOn sent this appeal to its members after Al Gore's recent energy speech calling for a massive program to switch America to clean energy (below this is the text of Gore's speech): "Al Gore took a big risk when he called on us to get 100% of our electricity from cheap, clean sources within 10 years.

It's an achievable goal, but it's already under attack from the oil and coal companies. They're calling his plan unrealistic, impossible, and crazy. We're in a crisis. If this is the fate of any new idea to get us out of this crisis alive, we're toast. Gore's challenge will live or die on the reaction of people like us.

We can turn back Big Oil's attack if hundreds of thousands of us personally endorse Gore's challenge to power our country with 100% cheap, clean energy within 10 years -- and then we urge Obama, McCain, and Congress to get on board.

Clicking here will add your support to Gore's challenge:

The petition says: "America must commit to producing 100% of our electricity from cheap, clean renewable energy sources, like solar and wind, within 10 years."

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says "it is absolutely possible" that Congress will accept Gore's challenge. But to make it happen, we'll need to show Congress just how many people want bold action.

Al Gore laid out a far-reaching yet simple plan to deal with the most pressing issues of the day. Switching to clean energy will help us survive the climate crisis. And save our souring economy. And help end the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan, and possibly Iran. And offer relief from high gas prices.

In Gore's words: "We're borrowing money from China to buy oil from the Persian Gulf to burn it in ways that destroy the planet. Every bit of that's got to change.

"But if we grab hold of that common thread and pull it hard, all of these complex problems begin to unravel and we will find that we're holding the answer to all of them right in our hand."

That answer is a massive program to switch America to clean energy.

Crisis brings opportunity.

Solar, wind, and other clean energy sources are ready to replace oil and coal. And these abundant energy sources promise lower costs at a time when getting to work is getting too expensive for too many. Such a simple, elegant solution. Can you make sure our country embraces change -- 100% renewable power in 10 years? Sign the petition to Obama, McCain, and Congress by clicking here.

****

This speech by Al Gore was delivered on July 17 at the D.A.R. Constitutional Hall.

Ladies and gentlemen:

There are times in the history of our nation when our very way of life depends upon dispelling illusions and awakening to the challenge of a present danger. In such moments, we are called upon to move quickly and boldly to shake off complacency, throw aside old habits and rise, clear-eyed and alert, to the necessity of big changes. Those who, for whatever reason, refuse to do their part must either be persuaded to join the effort or asked to step aside. This is such a moment. The survival of the United States of America as we know it is at risk. And even more -- if more should be required -- the future of human civilization is at stake.

I don't remember a time in our country when so many things seemed to be going so wrong simultaneously. Our economy is in terrible shape and getting worse, gasoline prices are increasing dramatically, and so are electricity rates. Jobs are being outsourced. Home mortgages are in trouble. Banks, automobile companies and other institutions we depend upon are under growing pressure. Distinguished senior business leaders are telling us that this is just the beginning unless we find the courage to make some major changes quickly.

The climate crisis, in particular, is getting a lot worse -- much more quickly than predicted. Scientists with access to data from Navy submarines traversing underneath the North polar ice cap have warned that there is now a 75 percent chance that within five years the entire ice cap will completely disappear during the summer months. This will further increase the melting pressure on Greenland. According to experts, the Jakobshavn glacier, one of Greenland's largest, is moving at a faster rate than ever before, losing 20 million tons of ice every day, equivalent to the amount of water used every year by the residents of New York City.

Two major studies from military intelligence experts have warned our leaders about the dangerous national security implications of the climate crisis, including the possibility of hundreds of millions of climate refugees destabilizing nations around the world.

Just two days ago, 27 senior statesmen and retired military leaders warned of the national security threat from an "energy tsunami" that would be triggered by a loss of our access to foreign oil. Meanwhile, the war in Iraq continues, and now the war in Afghanistan appears to be getting worse.

And by the way, our weather sure is getting strange, isn't it? There seem to be more tornadoes than in living memory, longer droughts, bigger downpours and record floods. Unprecedented fires are burning in California and elsewhere in the American West. Higher temperatures lead to drier vegetation that makes kindling for mega-fires of the kind that have been raging in Canada, Greece, Russia, China, South America, Australia and Africa. Scientists in the Department of Geophysics and Planetary Science at Tel Aviv University tell us that for every one degree increase in temperature, lightning strikes will go up another 10 percent. And it is lightning, after all, that is principally responsible for igniting the conflagration in California today.


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: war, environment, oil, economy, climate change

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Now this is the vision I want to hear
Posted by: abstractedaway on Jul 22, 2008 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you ask me, anyone who says we can't do it doesn't know what we're capable of if we get motivated. Like, off of our cable TVs and La-Z-Boys motivated, or growing victory gardens motivated. I don't understand the waffling about this. The lifestyle adjustments are possible, the energy demand is possible, and if we spent the money we blow on garrisoning the middle east for just one year on this, we'd have solartopia within reach. I'm pushing solar-based microgrids to my home city as a way to make our city more green.

We need to fix our infrastructure, generate jobs, and hand a livable planet and country down to our grandkids. What's it worth to us, huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just spit it out
Posted by: edith on Jul 22, 2008 4:05 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How are 100% generated non-carbon POWER PLANTS
going to reduce oil imports? Gore doesn't say, but then spends time bemoaing oil imports. Our power plants use primarily coal, then nuclear then natural gas.

If he means we'll use some of the wind and solar generated power to charge up electric cars, fine. Say so. Otherwise, he's talking about replacement of coal and nuclear for electricity only, without tackling the enormous problem of consumer and commericial transportation. He mentions gasoline prices, but does not state one explicit solution to replacement of gasoline.

He is not President because he is an awful, inarticulate speaker with muddled ideas. Too bad his major opponent in 2000 was just as muddled.

Can anyone in US public life come right out and say what they mean? Even T Boone Pickens' ads don't come right out and say, "Drive natural gas vehicles instead of gasoline-fired vehicles".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Just spit it out Posted by: richholland
» RE: Just spit it out Posted by: jhecht
» RE: Just spit it out Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» Reading Al's Mind Posted by: edith
» RE: eading Al's Mind Posted by: Dboy
Why not in ten years?
Posted by: nonlabel on Jul 22, 2008 4:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why is it when we try to set goals concerning energy and oil, out come the realists, pessimists, and naysayers. But when it comes to education, it's okay to set pie-in-the-sky goals like "every child will be proficient by 2014" (and by the way we're not going to fund it - just demand it), and you're branded an outcast it you point out the futility. C'mon, lets Reform the private sector and stop accepting these excuses!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why not in ten years? Posted by: edith
Two-Face Gore
Posted by: SwissTexan on Jul 22, 2008 4:59 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes, these things are possible and we could have been independent of foreign oil already if Carter's energy initiatives had not been axed by Reagan and then buried by.....yes, the Clinton and Gore Admin. Gore was, as vice president, head of the senate so where was all of this environmentalism then?!?!!!! He stinks my friends and I don't trust any initiative he is involved in.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two-Face Gore Posted by: edith
» RE: Two-Face Gore Posted by: lil ole me
» RE: Two-Face Gore Posted by: HelperMonkey
» Gore is a POMPOUS FRAUD ! Posted by: jwverez
» RE: Gore is a POMPOUS FRAUD ! Posted by: richholland
» RE: Gore is a POMPOUS FRAUD ! Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Gore is a POMPOUS FRAUD ! Posted by: madmac10
» RE: Gore is a POMPOUS FRAUD ! Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Gore is a POMPOUS FRAUD ! Posted by: madmac10
» RE: Gore is a POMPOUS FRAUD ! Posted by: helenwheels
» What's left unsaid Posted by: willymack
» RE: Two-Face Gore Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» Jimmy the Failure. Posted by: edith
» RE: Jimmy the Failure. Posted by: richholland
Ronnie RAYGUN took the solar panels off the WH roofs but why did Clinton not restore them? Gore?
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 22, 2008 6:55 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And what about Clinton and Gore supporting the DEA on bombing Lakota that could have had the chance to lead the nation out of fossil fuels and onto hemp? And why did C/G support NAFTA, Big Auto, cutting funding for public transportation infrastructure, more foreign oil imports, both parties in the Senate killing even the toothless Kyoto protocol, etc ...?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If Gore is so worried about saving humanity
Posted by: lindat on Jul 22, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
he should lose some weight. He looks like he swallowed an airhose.

Lost all respect for this turd when he picked Joe Lieberman as his VP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Like Ralph Nader said, Gore is all talk and no action.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 22, 2008 7:19 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At least Nader doesn't give up the fight for salvaging America. Gore is no Nader. FUCK, he ain't even Jimmy Carter who at least tried to make a positive difference after leaving office. Gore can give all his crummy speeches all he wants but he can shove them up his ASS until he first recognizes what Nader pointed out and that is there is not a dime's worth of difference between the Democrats and Republicans. Furthermore, for the past 8 years, the Democrats have not only worked hard to live up to that claim but further proved that there's not even a penny's worth of a difference between the Democrats and Republicans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Do we really care Posted by: WhuThe?!?
Gore has been wrong - but NOT on this issue!
Posted by: jhecht on Jul 22, 2008 7:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gore has certainly made some mistakes - but y'know, only people who never do anything never make mistakes...

I think that Gore had an epiphany when the Presidential election was stolen from him, and that's why he isn't running in 2008. He realized that the system was rigged, and decided to work around it.

For those of you who haven't seen it, go rent a copy of "An Inconvenient Truth" - it's an excellent, compelling movie about the need for change in our environmental policies, both as a nation, and a planet. In it, Gore says he's given the slide show he displays in the movie over a thousand times - in countries all over the world. I believe him. That's a LOT of effort for one person, not to mention the movie itself.

How many of Gore's critics here have made 1/100th of that effort to save the Earth? How many of them have done anything at all?

Personally, I think Gore's speech is visionary. Electrifying! I'm so proud of him for not entering into the local dogfight of the 2008 election, and keeping a firm focus on the most critical issue we face as a species.

Has Gore been wrong? Done wrong? Absolutely!
"Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."

Go visit www.wecansolveit.org. Watch the speech and sign the petition - even if you hate Al Gore's guts, he's right on, about this issue! His facts are right, and the solution he proposes is right!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thank you Divanne! :) Posted by: jhecht
A bit of realism
Posted by: peter193710 on Jul 22, 2008 8:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This plan is far too ambitious.
The shortest way to healthy energy
is the BlackLightPower technology
of Randell Mills- and this needs
lot of wise support and collaboration
for a Manhattan Plan style development.

Peter Gluck
editor of http://info.kappa.ro

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gore and Pickens Pick the Wrong Technology !
Posted by: methomas on Jul 22, 2008 8:09 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Renewable - Free Energy for the World – Forever

Renewable - Free Energy for the World – Forever

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What Do We Have To Lose?
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jul 22, 2008 9:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are so mired down with our dysfunctional government and political campaign system that we will never get a government that will address global warming and the oil policies that are destroying our society and our economy through war and empire building. I thank Al Gore for taking the environmental/energy issues to heart and putting himself out there as a leader. These changes will have to come from pressure outside and inside the government. Join the movement and do what you can. What do we have to lose for trying to save our country and our world?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Credibility? None.
Posted by: CalKid on Jul 22, 2008 9:56 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gore thinks that there is a 75% chance that the polar ice cap could disappear during the summer in 5 years. I think I could sell him the Brooklyn Bridge.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For the whiners.....
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jul 22, 2008 10:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The leading experts predict that we have less than 10 years to make dramatic changes in our global warming pollution lest we lose our ability to ever recover from this environmental crisis." More pressure needs to be brought on Congress to suspend those tax breaks for oil & coal.

I'm sorry, but with the record profits that they are making why do they need those breaks? Instead of putting money into the hands of the corporate thieves, they should be investing in alternatives and creating jobs here in this country.

In the meantime tax breaks should be given to those who are trying to produce solar, wind, and geothermal energy. Providing consumers breaks to make the necessary changes for solar heating or geothermal heating/cooling would help.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One cubic mile of Al Gore...
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Jul 22, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That is how much oil Al Gore will consume as he flies around the world trying to convince people to give up their fossil fuel addiction. OK yeah I'm just kidding. Actually that is the amount of oil the world uses every year.

One cubic mile out of a total endowment of about 60 cubic miles of feasibly extractible oil.

Why doesn't Al Gore ever talk about the simple and obvious fact that this incredible rate of production cannot be maintained for very long.

The energy required to make windmills and solar panels will have to come from that allotment of oil, as well as the natural gas and coal allotments. Once the rate of global oil production begins to decline, so too will the ability to allocate any "surplus" energy for the production of solar and wind and other alternatives. Any government program that forces alternative energy production will reduce the energy supplies for all other areas of consumption, resulting in even higher energy prices. If you think it is political suicide to push for alternative energy now, just wait till the public is crying to tap into the strategic petroleum reserve. 30 years ago alternative energy was a good idea. Now, it will only cause more lines to be drawn. America is going to have to suffer a staggering blow to its ego if any solution is to be found.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gee, Isn’t Gore Just TERRIBLE
Posted by: Jim Shaw on Jul 22, 2008 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
How awful that he didn’t explicitly mention replacing internal combustion-propelled autos with electric cars! I guess it’s really hard to figure out what he means when he says, “The way to bring gas prices down is to end our dependence on oil and use the renewable sources that can give us the equivalent of $1 per gallon gasoline.”

And isn’t it SUCH as scandal that in traveling the world trying to spur action on climate change, he hasn’t found the time to reduce his own carbon footprint, at least to the satisfaction of Alternet posters.

Yes, Al Gore is an imperfect human being. Yes, as vice president he should have tried to do much more to encourage action on this vital issue.

But, I ask you, WHO ELSE of his stature in the world is doing more to try and find a solution? He could easily just kick back and enjoy himself, occasionally giving paid speeches for his own benefit like so many ex-public servants, but instead he’s trying to save the planet.

Well, excuse him!

I must say, Alternet’s readership seems to indulge increasingly in cynical, nasty character assassination while hiding behind pseudonyms.

Yuck!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

just do something
Posted by: sirios on Jul 22, 2008 12:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there certainly are alot of try nothing critics commenting on this article. I feel that Gores strongest asset is his contagious enthusiasm. NO plan is ever perfect, so stop waiting for the savior to come and just try something. Any course of action needs to be adjusted as the process of action proceeds. give up your fear of needing to be right and just start! otherwise we may find ourselves knee deep in water and still arguing the point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Enthusiasm is fine but Posted by: solrev
To those who are not sheep and prefer to think for themselves
Posted by: scienceisnotconsensus on Jul 22, 2008 1:08 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Please read the following if you would rather think for yourself. About globalwarming/climate change:
American physicists warned not to debate global warming


Here are some excerpts:

One is how small the field of "experts" really is. The UN's IPCC is tasked with producing a summary of the "scientific consensus" and claims to process the contributions of some 2,500 scientists. But as Monckton writes:

"It is of no little significance that the IPCC’s value for the coefficient in the CO2 forcing equation depends on only one paper in the literature; that its values for the feedbacks that it believes account for two-thirds of humankind’s effect on global temperatures are likewise taken from only one paper; and that its implicit value of the crucial parameter κ depends upon only two papers, one of which had been written by a lead author of the chapter in question, and neither of which provides any theoretical or empirical justification for a value as high as that which the IPCC adopted."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The mouth that roared!
Posted by: carbon-based on Jul 22, 2008 7:03 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I challenge Gore to live in a normal sized house and stop wasting my resources!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Only The Very Rich Will Survive If Gore's Lunacy Continues To Spread
Posted by: opmoc on Jul 23, 2008 5:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The idiocy of converting food to ethanol - has already killed Millions in the Third World through starvation.

This is just the tip of the Environmental iceberg.

Read

http://dieoff.org/

Its about Peak oil.

If peak oil is true, the horrendous conclusions contained within with regards to a massive die off of human beings is also true.

Peak Oil - however is a scam - but the end result will still be the same.

There is no shortage of energy on the planet - but the Blood & Gore's of this World want to massively reduce the World's population of humans.

The Green Brigade following the Prophet's every word are like Turkey's voting for Christmas.

Read "The Solar Fraud: Why Solar Energy Won't Run the World"

Bye Bye AMERICA

The sooner you turn it off the better for the rest of us on the planet.

You've been conned.

CO2 does not cause Climate Change - so you are trying to fix something that isn't broken - whilst ignoring all the Real Problems.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So why have they got their heads stuck up their arses on this?
Posted by: Squarehead on Jul 23, 2008 1:58 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So many posters, here. So many who on other issues have indicated a degree of awareness (or lots of awareness)

So why have they got their heads stuck up their arses on this?

They don't see a 'spin'? They don't think 'cui bono?'

Presumably there are some few who are aware, complicit in the nay-saying of the oil companies funded 'research institutes'; for the others, why do YOU have to be so bloody RIGHT?

Any chance of some thought, separate from your personal entusiasms?

Forget about the man, forget about his bodyshape, forget about 15 years of Fox News that you may have absorbed.

Is the underlying story consistent, coherent, logical?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

And why isn't Algore speaking against anti-solar zoning policies that hit him?
Posted by: maxpayne on Jul 23, 2008 3:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here, read this below

Algore's Solar Panel problem

and then ask yourself "Why isn't Algore fighting back on bad zoning policies that limit or even prohibit people from installing solar panels on their roofs?"

And by the way, due to rising foreclosures, as more people move to apartments, condos, rental houses, and at most townhouses, none of which allow the resident the abilities to install solar panels or wind turbines to ween their ways off the grid let alone put up tough competition against the commercial energy interests, more people will be forced to suck up on fossil/nuclear fuel generated electricity. Pathetic that Algore doesn't even touch that issue with a 100 foot pole !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How Can I Stop Climate Change? What It Is, Why It Happens and What You Can Do About It
Posted by: Squarehead on Jul 24, 2008 3:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Something I came across recently Applies to United Kingdom
How Can I Stop Climate Change?
What It Is, Why It Happens and What You Can Do About It
Foreword: Tony Juniper, Friends of the Earth

“I was recently at the launch of the new high-speed rail link from London to Paris. Passengers boarded at eleven in the morning and arrived right in the heart of Paris just 180 minutes later. As the train slipped through the autumn countryside of southern England and northern France people talked face to face, read the morning papers and ate and drank in comfort and quiet. The people on Eurostar’s Tread Lightly might not have known it but they were also doing the planet a favour. Each passenger going from London to Paris by train is creating just a tenth of the climate-changing emissions of someone making the journey by aeroplane.

For me that day was a moment of inspiration, a reminder of how humanity’s technical brilliance, plus a dose of common sense, can take us - literally - to places we once thought
impossible.

This book is about a better life. It’s about turning the challenge of climate change into a way forward for us all, and coming out on the other side healthier, fitter and happier.
And because we need to do something now, rather than in 40 years’ time, it’s about making that journey at high speed. Our starting point is the science - what’s happening to our world and why. The story has been brilliantly told by others, notably by the Nobel prize-winning scientists who make up the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change and former US vice-president Al Gore. We explain some key facts – about what’s going on, and what’s likely to happen if we let it (Chapters 1 to 3) - before moving on to the big question: what are we going to do about it?

Imagine a home that you don’t need to heat because the sun does it for you. Imagine your fridge running on the neverending power of the tides that beat at Britain’s shores. Imagine buses so reliable and clean you actually want to leave the car at home. Imagine the end of fuel poverty, better food, fewer traffic jams and happier neighbourhoods. Imagine a new economic wave, new jobs in new industries supplying whole new markets. All this happens to be possible because the things that we need to do to stop climate change (read about them in Chapters 4 to 9) will also improve our quality of life. The solutions are out there, but who’s going to make them happen? From fitting low-energy light bulbs, to flying less and recycling more, there are many things each of us can do (lots of practical information in Chapters 7 to 9). Among the green selfhelp manuals around encouraging each of us to do our bit to take the stress off the planet, few make this key point: that even if each of us were to deal with the environmental impact of our home, our travel and our shopping, it would still not be enough. Yes I can turn off the lights but I don’t run the polluting power station that makes the electricity. I can use my car less but why should I, if some gas guzzler is allowed to take up my space on the road?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part 2: How Can I Stop Climate Change?
Posted by: Squarehead on Jul 24, 2008 3:36 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can insulate my loft and even install solar panels on my house but what about my neighbour who can’t afford it, and what about my kids’ school, which uses far more energy than my family does?

Most climate-changing pollution is outside my direct control. Greenhouse gases are just part of how things work – like the way food is produced, public institutions are run, our roads are built. I can directly control only about a third of my own tiny share of Britain’s carbon footprint. Someone has got to change the way things work on a big scale - and fast. In fact the science implies that the UK should cut its emissions of the main greenhouse gas, carbon dioxide, by at least 80 per cent by the middle of this century. When you think about how dependent we are now on oil, gas and coal, this looks like a huge task. Who’s going to do it? As consumers we have a certain amount of muscle – and we should use it. Nagging our shops and services for greener stuff helps to push them in the right direction: being an ethical consumer also tells the politicians that we’re ready for change. But we’re not just shoppers. Each of us is part of a family, neighbourhood, or town. We can talk to our friends and family, get things done in our clubs, societies, schools, unions, and associations to reduce their carbon footprint.

Most important, we have rights and a voice as citizens. We can tell our elected representatives – from the town hall to parliament – that we want a greener life. They should get on and make it easier for all of us to do the low-carbon thing. Governments can ban cars with poor fuel consumption, set tough standards for products and provide alternatives to flying. Governments can structure markets to make companies innovate: obliging local authorities to specify clean green energy for all new homes, for example, would create a huge business opportunity and, as other countries have shown, do a lot to cut emissions.

But this scale of change will only happen if enough of us ask for it. When I joined the staff of Friends of the Earth in 1990 one of the first things I did was to promote our findings on how
halting deforestation would be good for the climate. Since then we have notched up a series of wins for the environment. We have put green issues firmly on the political agenda, sought broad changes to the way our economy works and persuaded politicians to take real steps to protect our communities and future generations. And we’ve always done it with strong public backing: the reason you have doorstep recycling is because thousands of people like you asked for it. At about the time this book will first appear in the shops a new Climate Change Act will be passing into UK law. This will be the world’s first legally binding national framework for longterm reductions in greenhouse gas emissions. If the government has done its job properly the law will set a target for cutting carbon dioxide emissions by 80 per cent by 2050, including emissions from aviation and shipping. Friends of the Earth’s Big Ask campaign and the voices of hundreds of thousands of people have been crucial in securing this breakthrough. It shows how powerful we are when we act together. In all my years working on the environment I have never been so excited about the changes that we’re about to see – changes that people like you have made possible.

There’s a lot do, but we are making real progress. The book in your hands is one of the next steps. It is the perfect companion for making the most of the opportunity created by the new Climate Change Act. The solutions are out there. Get on board and make them live.None of us can deal with climate change alone - we have to act together. How can I stop climate change? I can’t. But we can.”

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

addictionpro
Posted by: AddictionPro on Jul 24, 2008 5:02 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al Gore simply wants to be able to stay in the limelight. Prior technologies have been inadequte compaired to current technologies in determining if our carbon emissions have any real effect on any global warming. We do get our energy from virtually clean sources and they have been clean for years. Junk science does not validate anything, however; there are enough "Lemmings" in the world to follow the leader right off the cliff. Should we be looking at alternatives in energy? We have been for years....what do you think the water-wheel was for and how about windmills? We are not ALL a bunch of LEMMINGS. We can see the value in looking at alternatives as sources of energy and we have done well with what we have done to date. Nuclear energy and natural gas turbines are relatively new along with giant windmills and photovoltiac cells. Hoover dam is not very new at all along with a lot of other hydroelectric dams. As for the big "FEAR OF GLOBAL WARMING," that is a natural cycle that for the present we are not going through. Over the past century, we have warmed up in total around the world by 0.1 degree centigrade. That is about as much as curent science can find and we may actually be turning the corner back to a 100 year period of global cooling. Another good reason to seek efficient alternative energy options.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: addictionpro Posted by: Squarehead
Al Gore
Posted by: robbie.seal on Jul 26, 2008 8:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Is a sharlatin. He has set up companies to make money off of you fear even though scientists say that the Earth is actually beginning a cooling cycle. Good thing for him... He needs to make payments on his 30K square foot hosue for two people and his SUVs and his private jets... All the while telling you to walk to work... Sheeple...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Yeah actually he is terrible
Posted by: earth_saver on Jul 30, 2008 11:14 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If he was truly trying to do something he would start with his personal life. He'd reduce his energy consumption, reduce his gasoline usage to less than what the average american uses. Until then why should I take him seriously? Make excuses for him all you want - until he shows me he is serious about his impact on the environment and natural resouces his opinion is irrelevant to me. I'd sooner listen to someone that practices what they preach.

I'm sick of rich people (politicians, movie stars, musicians, etc.) telling me how I should live my life. They have the potential to make a much bigger impact on the environment than I ever could but they would rather tell me how it is my responsibility to tighten my belt or spend more money for, as yet, overly expensive alternatives. They can afford solar panels for their homes - I can't. There is nothing I'd like better than to be off the grid but it isn't feasible no matter how much Al Gore urges me to change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Creep
Posted by: uncleeddie on Aug 6, 2008 8:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Al Gore should sell his oil company before he tells us the sky is falling because of CO2. Why doesn't he? Because more than anyone else this globalist knows that human induced global warming is the biggest hoax of all time. CO2 is not a poison and is simply the boogie man much in the same vein as Bin Ladin. No more poisonous than oxygen or water CO2 is in fact life giving. People are starting to see through the old Corporate Media game of left vs right bull crap. Creeps like Gore who masquerade around like environmentalists while their true goal is servitude to big banks. That is why Gore himself doesn't sacrifice but stands to gain from this hoax. Time to wake people. Infowars.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]