Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

D.C. Is Drowning in a Sea of Campaign Cash

By Bill Moyers and Michael Winship, Bill Moyers Journal. Posted July 21, 2008.


Follow the money -- it goes from your gas tank to the wine bars and steak houses of DC, where the payoffs from big business to politicians go down.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why the End May Be Coming for Coal
Christine MacDonald

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Bill Moyers Michael Winship

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Once again we're closing the barn door after the horse is out and gone. In Washington the Federal Reserve has finally acted to stop some of the predatory lending that exploited people's need for money. And like Rip Van Winkle, Congress is finally waking up from a long doze under the warm sun of laissez faire economics. That's French for turning off the alarm until the burglars have made their getaway.

Philosophy is one reason we do this to ourselves; when you worship market forces as if they were the gods of Olympus, then the gods can do no wrong -- until, of course, they prove to be human. Then we realize we should have listened to our inner agnostic and not been so reverent in the first place.

But we also get into these terrible dilemmas -- where the big guys step all over everyone else and the victims are required to pay the hospital bills -- because we refuse to recognize the connection between money and politics. This is the great denial in democracy that may ultimately mean our ruin. We just don't seem able to see or accept the fact that money drives policy. It's no wonder that Congress and the White House have been looking the other way as the predators picked the pockets of unsuspecting debtors. Mega banking and investment firms have been some of the biggest providers of the cash vital to keeping incumbents in office. There isn't much appetite for biting -- or regulating -- the manicured hand that feeds them.

Guess who gave the most money to candidates in this 2007-08 federal election cycle? That's right, the financial services and real estate industries. They stuffed nearly $250 million dollars into the candidate coffers. The about-to-be-bailed-out Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac together are responsible for about half the country's $12 trillion mortgage debt. Lisa Lerer of Politico.com reports that over the past decade, the two financial giants with the down home names have spent nearly $200 million on campaign contributions and lobbying. According to Lerer, "They've stacked their payrolls with top Washington power brokers of all political stripes, including Republican John McCain's presidential campaign manager, Rick Davis; Democrat Barack Obama's original vice presidential vetter, Jim Johnson; and scores of others now working for the two rivals for the White House."

Last Sunday's New York Times put it as bluntly as anyone ever has: "In Washington, Fannie and Freddie's sprawling lobbying machine hired family and friends of politicians in their efforts to quickly sideline any regulations that might slow their growth or invite greater oversight of their business practices. Indeed, their rapid expansion was, at least in part, the result of such artful lobbying over the years."

What a beautiful term: "artful lobbying." It means honest graft. Look at any of the important issues bogged down in the swampland along the Potomac and you don't have to scrape away the muck too deeply to find that campaign cash is at the core of virtually every impasse. We're spending more than six percent of our salaries on gasoline, and global warming keeps temperatures rising but the climate bill was killed last month and President Bush just got rid of his daddy's longtime ban on offshore drilling. Only in a fairy tale would anyone believe it's just coincidence that the oil and gas industries have donated more than $18 million to federal candidates this year, three-quarters of it going to Republicans. They've spent more than $26 million lobbying this year -- that's seven times more than environmental groups have spent.

Follow the money -- it goes from your gas tank to the wine bars and steak houses of DC, where the payoffs happen. Or ponder that FISA surveillance legislation that just passed the Senate. It let the big telecommunications companies off the hook for helping the government wiretap our phones and laptops without warrants. Over the years those telecom companies have given Republicans in the House and Senate $63 million dollars and Democrats $49 million. No wonder that when their lobbyists reach out and place a call to Congress, they never get a busy signal. Do the same without making a big contribution, and you'll be put on "hold" until the embalmer shows up to claim your cold corpse.

The late journalist Meg Greenfield once wrote that trying to get money out of politics is akin to the quest for a squirrel-proof birdfeeder. No matter how clever and ingenious the design, the squirrels are always one mouthful ahead of you. Here's an example. Corporations are limited in how much they can contribute to candidate's campaigns, right? But someone's always figuring out how to open another back door. So Democrats have turned to Steve Farber. He's using the resources of his big K Street law and lobbying factory to help raise $40 million for the Democratic National Convention. Half a dozen of his clients have signed up, including AT&T, Comcast, Western Union and Google. Their presence at the convention will offer lots of opportunities to curry favors at private parties while ordinary delegates wander Denver looking for the nearest Wendy's. By the way, just as you pay at the gas pump for those energy lobbyists to wine and dine your representatives in Washington, you'll pay on April 15 for Denver -- corporations can deduct their contributions.

Another back door -- one quite familiar to Steve Farber and his ilk -- leads to presidential libraries. Bill Clinton's in Arkansas required serious political bucks, and we're not talking penny ante fines for overdue books. Again, there's no limit to the amount a donor can give and no obligation to reveal their names. Clinton's cost $165 million and we still don't know the identities of everyone who put up the dough, even though four years ago a reporter stumbled on a list that included Arab businessmen, Saudi royals, Hollywood celebs and the governments of Dubai, Kuwait, Qatar, Brunei and Taiwan. Hmmm...

Once George W. is out of the White House, he, too, plans what one newspaper described as a "legacy polishing" institute -- a presidential library and think tank at Southern Methodist University in Dallas costing half a billion dollars. Last Sunday, The Times of London released a remarkable video of one of the president's buddies and fund raisers -- Stephen Payne, a political appointee appointed to the Homeland Security Advisory Council.

The Times set him up in a video sting, and taped a conversation in which Payne offers an exiled leader of Kyrgyzstan meetings with such White House luminaries as Vice President Cheney and Condoleezza Rice -- provided he makes a whopping contribution to the Bush Library, and an even bigger payment to Payne's lobbying firm. Payne tells him, "It will be somewhere between $600,000 and $750,000, with about a third of it going directly to the Bush Library… That's gonna be a show of 'we're interested, we're your friends, we're still your friends.'"

The White House denies any connection between library contributions and access to officials and harrumphed at the preposterous idea that Payne had a close relationship with the President. Unfortunately, there's at least one photo of Payne with the President cutting brush at his Crawford ranch. There's also one of Payne demonstrating more guts than common sense, on a rifle range with Deadeye Dick Cheney.

Payne, who now is supporting John McCain, says he's done nothing wrong, but a congressional investigation intends to find out. So from the financial meltdown brought on by predatory lending to global warming to tax breaks and other favors, the late California politician Jesse "Big Daddy" Unruh got it right: Money is the mother's milk of politics. He knew what he was talking about, because Big Daddy swigged it by the gallon. Now it has curdled into a witch's brew.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: money and politics, political contributions

Bill Moyers is managing editor of the weekly public affairs program Bill Moyers Journal, which airs Friday night on PBS. Check local airtimes or comment at The Moyers Blog at www.pbs.org/moyers.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Imagine if...
Posted by: Bobsays on Jul 21, 2008 12:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All this money wasted on electing corrupt Dems, instead went to setting up an health insurance fund?

It would mean:

1) Michael Moore wouldn't have a job
2) Nobody would be uninsured for healthcare
3) We wouldn't need to listen Nancy Pelosi anymore

Just imagine if...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Take the Money out of Politics! Take the Government BACK!
Posted by: williameon on Jul 21, 2008 4:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Government and Military is 70% Privatized!
We pay $1000 Dollars a Day for a Mercenary to Guard our Military in the GREEN ZONE while our Grunts are being shot up for a Hundred.
It is a crime.

Publicly fund all elections.
Level the playing field.
Free the Media.
Break up the Media Monopolies:
One outlet in one market.
Nationalize all energy resources for National Security.
Place a windfall Tax on EXXON.
Provide equal time to all Candidates for as a National service!

We are spending Billions of dollars to buy adds from the same CORPORATIONS that enslave us.
Does that make sense?
Give what little hard earned cash that we have left to the Media Giants that spew relentless, endless, homogenized PROPAGANDA!
SURGE
PURGE
Upgrade and
REBOOT!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Otto .
Posted by: otto on Jul 21, 2008 5:26 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Long live Bill Moyers...if the CIA or School of the America's (or Dick Cheney) don't get to him first! That's become the American Way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Instead of complaining, get your BULLDOZERS together and let's SMASH D.C. and REBUILD IT !!!!
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 21, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The system is broken beyond repair so let's just destroy it or let it collapse and start over already ! Geesh !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

nothing new
Posted by: willd4change on Jul 21, 2008 7:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has been going on for years and nothing is changing. why would you expect anything different now. Hell let fredie and fannie crash make them pay the money back NOT THE TAX PAYERS but you all know we will foot the bill. They dug the hole burry them in it. I have a few guns and a few fishing poles all I have to do is plant a victory garden and weather the storm. Good luck with change, I knew a guy who had a dream too.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wha?
Posted by: Quasar on Jul 21, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
". . . we refuse to recognize the connection between money and politics. This is the great denial in democracy that may ultimately mean our ruin. We just don't seem able to see or accept the fact that money drives policy."

Exactly who is we? Because I have no problem at all seeing or accepting that connection. Nor does my neighbor. Nor even my mother. Or am I just a part of the cynical fringe? I thought it was common knowledge that money and politics go hand in hand.

I think it ls less about learning to to accept this reality as it is to have the courage to "refuse" the graft and to fix what is broken.

This courage and commitment must then come first from those we elect to represent us and the those in the media who we rely on to keep us informed.

Accountability, transparency, integrity . . . I want all of it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Until WE Understand And Acknowledge What Facilitates The Financing Of Political Corruption...
Posted by: gazooks on Jul 21, 2008 9:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... we'll suffer the same invariable result, it's self sustaining, self reinforcing and destructive of democracy. Our system is now TOTALLY co-opted and we've been conditioned through decades of massive, premeditated, misdirecting propaganda and engineered ignorance. The dumbing down has been a relentless, sophisticated process that prey's on human nature.

We've all, or nearly so, drunk the Kool-Aid that we can trust that a political system, well designed to insure perpetuated political freedom from tyranny, can do so when deprived of a fundamental element that makes it possible to do so in the first place.

Consider the utter blatancy of corruption that we've witnessed under Bush. The no bid contracts to crony industry, vast amounts of public money to private, politically allied entities, the firming up of media control by patron corporations, and the clamor of the market cheerleaders spewing ruinous horse shit to a fear driven, greed enticed, thoroughly flummoxed and fleeced public. A public that's forced to fund a war to the profit of a diabolical administration while it can no longer pay for it's homes, afford healthcare, rely on it's infrastructure and now drive it's cars and heat it's homes. This, from the richest, most powerful nation on earth. It's tragic, and it's going to get much worse.

The cycle never changes and it never will until we deprive the politicians the means to their corrupted ends. It's been staring us in the face, and we look the other way because it's what we've been conditioned to do. We're the enablers.

As a life long leftist in constant opposition to the hypocrisy present in those governing the "American Dream", and as a dissenter to the regimentation foisted onto the backs of the working class, the parade of wars, the horrendous creed contradictions of our international policies and the stupefying politicalization of education and religion, ... with great reluctance I've been forced to acknowledge and abandon a great myth and along with it a major political hero, FDR.

The wellspring of the corruption we drown in today was the abandonment of the very monetary discipline that enabled our country to exist and provided franchise to it's citizens. And the executioner of our democracy, despite rationale, the persona, the great words of social care, the iconic magnitude of leadership it is, in the end, myth.

The New Deal, was in fact a raw one. And the political largesse that bought four terms as President is the same money that bought Bush two. And the debt that's now drowning the future of this nation was created by compromising it's economic foundation for the support of special interests, not those of we, the people.

The control of the money supply, our franchise to political power, is out of our control as was never intended by our framers. It is instead in the hands of those in the chain of murderous thieves that do not represent our interests or those of our family's welfare and future. They use the printing press to steal public trillions for their bribes and payoffs, like their stooges passing out $100 bills in Baghdad, they can buy anyone, anywhere or so they think, and so far they're right. Worried about Obama? There's no doubt about McCain. Without public pressure it's forgone.

They pay for their wars, their weapons, their constituency of special interests with our money for their profit and we allow it by right of ignorance. We can create an infinity of compensatory laws, policies and institutions that will never correct the problem. That will require a sea change perspective on our view of money to reflect the same clear understanding of our founders that knew that you cannot get something for nothing, and that freedom requires the wisdom of history and unrelenting vigilance.

A lesson no longer taught in our schools.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

logic
Posted by: logic on Jul 21, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
when in history has it ever been different? and why?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: logic Posted by: Lauren
Here's a letter I sent Moyers in 2006
Posted by: realveive on Jul 21, 2008 6:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With the exception of the Molly (RIP) reference, it's as appropriate today

========
Dear Bill Moyers,

I think Molly Ivins has an excellent idea when it comes to a presidential run with your name at the top of the ticket. You may be turned off by the idea—though a tad proud about being so highly regarded—but it might not be as bad an experience as you think. You wouldn’t have to go through a massive self-promotional effort. Virtually everyone in the Democratic/Progressive/Liberal wing of voters, along with the non-Cretins on the other side of the spectrum, know who you are and where you generally stand. All you’d really need to do is address, with specificity, those issues currently on the front burner of the political scene. Once you’ve provided your take on Iraq, terror, Israel, the UN, globalization, outsourcing, abortion, gay rights, embryonic stem cell research, along with a few other issues, your “record” could be put alongside the other candidates for everyone to evaluate and compare. I’m sure you’ve already formulated this stuff so it wouldn’t take much of your time to update and polish it a bit. You could then pretty much loaf through the campaign, not spending a great deal of time and money trying to win. Folks would know who you are and where you stand. Your debate performances would further work to sell the unvarnished Moyers persona. At the very least, you’d be serving as an exemplar of what an honest candidate should be like. Giving the public a chance to see a real person running for office might shock them away from the illusions that the image makers put together to market candidates ranging from soup, to most of the dishonest nuts that run for office.

Do it, Bill. Think of it as your gift to the America that was. Help get the America that is back on track. This nation is in a world of hurt and it’s going to take people like you to heal it. My best to someone who comes across as an exceptionally good guy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

THE BAPTISTS IN OKLAHOMA STOOD IN THE PULPITS AND TOLD THEIR CONGREGATIONS
Posted by: Raymond Emerson on Jul 21, 2008 7:56 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to vote republican. Our republican speaker of the house has finally been caught lying to a bankruptcy court (hiding assets). To my knowledge not a single preacher has lost his job over this. To my mind every single one should be fired.

Now to the real point. The only thing I ever had against Martin Luther King, Jimmy Carter, and Bill Moyers was that they were Baptists. In their cases I have to restrain myself. But, Oklahoma's Baptists are guilty as charged.

Bill Moyers has improved with age like a fine wine. Yes, I would gladly support him for president. But, you could not get him on the ballot here. Oklahoma requires that you get 43,000 registered voters on a petition to get on the ballot. The two parties protect their monopoly. Nader didn't make it. Ron Paul won't. They don't much like us voting. All minorities are discriminated against in Oklahoma. That includes blacks, gays, nearly all religions except Baptist and/or evangelical, and any political stripe outside of the two parties. There is little or no support for a change in the law.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thank You, Bill
Posted by: wormfarmer on Jul 21, 2008 10:33 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I’ve said it before,
Look, if you want to see a REAL difference in the ways and direction this country influences the world at large, then vote a candidate that you can conscientiously support.
I’m tired of the bickering amongst a divided, distracted, and diverted populace. The
present corporate strategy seems to be, “Let the people argue, we’ll do what we want
while they’re distracted.” Our government professes belief in freedom, democracy, a
responsible and responsive constituency as well as a government, and I see no evidence of
that. The lack of meaningful participation by the populace shows in the acts of leadership,
both parties, the reactionary behavior by this administration, and the lukewarm
non-binding behavior by the democratically controlled, (ha, ha), congress. We as a people,
should display a society that believes in and promotes fairness and justice in this country as
an example for other governments to emulate. Let us throw the corporate minions out of
THE PEOPLES’ GOVERNMENT, and return POWER to the PEOPLE. After all,isn’t
the definition of democracy a government of, by, and for THE PEOPLE?


Just my thoughts of what we’ve forgotten, what we’ve neglected. Vote sanity, vote Nader.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement