COMMENTS: 24
Did Hollywood Execs Finally Get the Memo That Women Can Carry Movies?
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Could it be that this season will turn out to be the Summer of Women, on screen, if not on the campaign trail?
Sex and the City, that glitzy ode to conspicuous consumption and soppy (or, shall I say, shoppy) female friendship, still has shapely box office legs, having rung up a whopping $369 million worldwide these past six weeks, making it the ninth-largest-grossing romantic comedy since 1978.
And somewhat surprisingly, the Sex and the City gals are suddenly in good screen company: Angelina Jolie is drawing crowds by outshooting and outkicking her male counterparts in the action picture, Wanted, a Matrix-wannabe which, despite so-so reviews, took in $176 million in a mere 17 days, largely because of her presence.
And in Kit Kittredge: An American Girl, Abigail Breslin as Kit, the feisty 10-year-old reporter, is wowing tomorrow's feminists and shopaholics alike in this screen version adapted from stories by Valerie Tripp, which were based on an American Girl doll.
Although the movie, going into its second week of wide release, has not yet found its audience, Kit displays a plucky competence worthy of Shirley Temple (who, after all, affected peace between the Brits and militant Indians in Wee Willie Winkie in 1937) and far more ambition and social conscience than the moony, man-crazy women of Sex and the City.
What's more, Meryl Streep in Mamma Mia! (opening July 18) and America Ferrera in The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants 2 (Aug. 8) -- both written, directed and produced by women -- just may help make this a female-centric summer indeed.
Proving a Feminine Point
As a longtime critic and observer of movies, I have been waiting for a Summer of Women to happen, it seems, since before the Great Flood.
While I admit that the emergence of this season's chick flicks will not solve our health insurance crisis, shrink the gender wage gap or bring down the price of oil, their success should at least unequivocally prove to Hollywood's moguls that women's pictures are not D.O.A. And they should show the legions of craven executives with short memories -- vice presidents drawing high salaries for greenlighting an endless array of cartoonish movies (read: comic book sequels) for the young boy in all of us -- that stories of interest to women will lure us into movie theaters in noteworthy numbers.
Primarily, though, this box-office girl power should shut up studio heads like Jeff Robinov, who created a blizzard of ugly publicity for himself last October when that unsparing industry chronicler, Nikki Finke, reported in an LA Weekly column that Robinov, then Warner Brothers' president of production, "had made a new decree that his studio is no longer making movies with women cast as the main lead."
Immediately, Gloria Allred, the attorney and women's rights warrior, weighed in on his remarks. "This is an insult to all moviegoers and particularly women," she harrumphed, then called for a boycott of Warner films. Robinov, who was then angling for promotion when he found himself labeled Hollywood's man-who-women-loved-to-hate, backpedaled at the speed of light.
And yes, he was promoted. Now the man responsible, in varying degrees, for such male-centric movies as The Matrix, Swordfish and the Batman franchise, is president of the new Warner Brothers Picture Group.
Painting Women Out of the Pictures
Of course, Robinov didn't really need to articulate his mandate; Hollywood has been easing women out of the big picture for years.
The real shift in box-office demographics may actually have begun with the advent of television: By the mid-60s the networks were gearing prime-time programming (and advertising) to females between 18 and 49, once the heart of the movie audience. And suddenly Hollywood became a haven for the male sensibility, the male "buddy" movie, and for a new generation of (male) filmmakers who, like Steven Spielberg and George Lucas, were creating little-boy screen adventures at the precise moment when women's real lives were in dynamic, and perhaps confusing, flux.
But what finally doused the fire in Hollywood's proverbial belly for women's movies was the discovery that they did not spark the same billion-dollar global box office as boy stories, particularly the comic book and space adventures that were long on visual pyrotechnics and short on smart dialogue, character complexity and relationships.
Still, Robinov's comments make one wonder how conveniently the men's club of Hollywood has chosen to forget the worldwide box office rewards of such recent movies about women as Enchanted ($340 million), 27 Dresses ($159 million), Juno ($229 million) and The Devil Wears Prada ($326 million).
Mulling the Male Flops
To put the situation into perspective, did any studio executive ever muse, after the shocking failure of last fall's Brad Pitt vehicle, The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford (domestic box office: $6 million; worldwide: $15 million), that it would be a smart idea to stop making movies featuring man-centric stories?
Did anyone have misgivings about boys-will-be-boys flicks when Wes Anderson's testosterone-drenched The Darjeeling Limited, with Owen Wilson, Jason Schwartzman and the Oscar winner Adrien Brody, opened the New York Film Festival last September, then broke down before ever gathering steam (worldwide: $15.5 million)?
And, on assessing the rotten global returns of George Clooney's The Good German ($6 million), Ryan Gosling's Lars and the Real Girl ($10 million) or Johnny Depp's The Libertine ($11 million), did even one among the new breed of female executives dare to whisper in the ladies room of that upscale industry watering hole, the Ivy: "Nix the guy pix. And bring back the women?"
Hard to know, hard to imagine.
So here's to Kit, who could teach Carrie Bradshaw a thing or two about journalism. Here's to Jolie's villainous Fox who can smack 'em down and shoot 'em up with the worst of them. To Carrie, Samantha, Miranda, Charlotte and their Manolos, Vera Wangs and glorious closet space. And even to the Streep and Ferrer characters and their box-office promise.
Together, this summer sorority could well begin to challenge the reign of all those one-dimensional comic-book "men" -- Superman, Batman, Spiderman, X-Man and Iron Man -- and go on to kindle a fire that brings women back to the movies and, eventually, movies back to women.
Marjorie Rosen, the author of "Popcorn Venus: Women, Movies, and the American Dream," teaches journalism at Lehman College, CUNY.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: kepstein7777 on Jul 21, 2008 1:30 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Doesn't anybody in Hollywood have the courage to tell this woman she can't sing? Of course, the actual members of ABBA are no better....I guess your hearing starts to go after a certain age.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Apologies to ABBA
Posted by: kepstein7777
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jul 21, 2008 1:50 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beste on Jul 21, 2008 2:02 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Iron Man and Indianna Jones have done better at the Box Office than SATC
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Does this author have a clue what she's talking about?
Posted by: cordas
» RE: Does this author have a clue what she's talking about?
Posted by: mejsmith
» RE: Does this author have a clue what she's talking about?
Posted by: Tat106
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Jul 21, 2008 4:18 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ugh, this article is horrible and a perfect example of why American feminists are destined to die alone and miserable, surrounded by empty wine bottles and a dozen cats.
I'll be importing a real woman from Eastern Europe or South East Asia here shortly. You know, feminine, wifely, motherly, that doesn't think she's a man with a vagina.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Batman is one dimensional?
Posted by: luzmejor
» Boy you sure are funny!
Posted by: DanoM
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Moonray on Jul 21, 2008 4:32 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Don't get me wrong. I'm no prude and have nothing against casual sex, or even materialism, in moderate amounts. But these ongoing, dopey sagas of horny women dressed in designer duds -- or of women banding together in ways guaranteed to stimulate lesbian fantasies -- are really tiresome. Come to think of it, so are most movies aimed at men, so I guess we shouldn't be surprised.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 21, 2008 6:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jul 21, 2008 8:04 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Disliked to hated the most recent 3 Star Wars movies. The last one, the dialogue was painful, I think organ failure painful. And yes some movies spend too much time showing off CGI not enough on the story, most recent Star Wars a classic example.
Comic book movies are tough, because for those of us that know the origin story, we have to suffer through all of that background that the general populace needs to catch up with us.
I agree we need more and some will be better and some worse, women centered movies. I loved Jane Austen book club last year. I was quite shocked that the very good Bonneville movie was released 18 months after I had seen it at the Toronto International Film Festival in September 2006, why wait that long with Jessica Lange, Kathy Bates, and Joan Allen.
Box office numbers is not the best gauge of the quality of a movie, or importance, that can be the result of poor decisions for both the male and female oriented movies by the movie executives.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Star Wars
Posted by: kepstein7777
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Joeraider on Jul 21, 2008 8:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I love movies and I go to all of them. I don't shy away because a film gets a chick flick label. I enjoy a good strong female performance. But to cite the above films as representing a surge in female success at the box office is to declare that the success of Wall-E means more robot films should be in production.
The films this author names as male preferred rarely target the male perspective. A plot is outlined and followed and a story told. Does the author want a collection of films exclusively following the female perspective on things?
Women are not more insightful then men because they say they are. They are not better arbiters of quality or fun. And they didn't flock in record numbers to "Titanic" to see Kate Winslet.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: weathered on Jul 21, 2008 9:22 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Cheap and shallow begets cheap and shallow, look at Adam Sandler.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Jodi Foster ?!?!
Posted by: countingdaisies
Comments are closed-
Posted by: dbarber on Jul 21, 2008 9:49 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But I wonder, why someone who has so firmly ensconsed herself in the capitalist mindset is writing for a feminist newsletter. Her thinking seems to be: 1)what Hollywood does best is to relentlessly pander to the lowest common denominator; 2)I haven't felt pandered to enough lately; therefore 3) if Hollywood starts pandering to me and others like me once again, it will represent a moral victory.
If you (or a group or community you identify with) have managed to escape the idiot gaze of the media, even momentarily, this is a good thing. Hollywood for the most part doesn't want to show reality, it wants to sell an image. Sex and the City proved that. They are NEVER going to show women who are strong, intelligent and informed about the world around them except for the small crop of films made to attract Oscar's interest. And you will always be better served by independent films.
No matter how many Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants sequels are made, they will never equal the power of one Sophie's Choice. Hollywood will only make good movies if people go to see them, and right now, it's easier to make a dumb movie and load it up with CGI. After all, if an expensive movie fails, at least they get a tax write-off...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Starfall Deception on Jul 21, 2008 2:55 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Jul 21, 2008 6:30 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yea, so now it's not enough that there's absolutely nothing on TV that a guy would want to watch -- outside PBS or sports -- and female interests have to take over the movies, too? When will the madness end?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jul 22, 2008 10:23 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
SHOES!
MAKEUP!
CLOTHES!
LABELS!
SOCIAL DIVASHIP!
"I'm a GODDESS!"
"I wanna be a shallow bitch that only cares about myself, my entertainment & my status"
yeah, women need more of THAT...
gee, I wonder if this film is about SHALLOW CONSUMERISM rather than its hype about women & feminism?
Sex in the City could as easily be about men as women, its not a film or series ABOUT WOMEN, its a vehicle glorifying women as shallow bitches.
YOU DON'T SEE THIS IN HOLLYWOOD:
thoughts on the new "Middle Class" prosperity: "Mom forced to live in car with dogs" - CNN.com
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
"... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice" ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» but wait! I just remembered a NEW FILM: "Frozen River"
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mstenger on Jul 22, 2008 3:57 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Beste on Aug 12, 2008 1:57 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Dark Knight @ $705 million worldwide in just 3.5 wks....
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Michael Moore: Republicans Should Be Happy -- Health Care Bill Will Save Their Lives, Too
200,000 March For Immigration Reform in Massive D.C. Rally
"This Is What Change Looks Like": Congress Passes Health-Care Reform




