Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Reborn MLB Slugger Josh Hamilton Is One Lucky Former Drug Addict

By Anthony Papa, AlterNet. Posted July 17, 2008.


Hamilton was lucky enough to be able to afford treatment and get access right away. Most people cannot afford it.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Why Are We Locking Up Traumatized Veterans for Their Addictions Instead of Offering Them Treatment?
Penny Coleman

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh Stoking GOP Civil War
Eric Boehlert

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
Hard to Believe: 73 U.S. Kids Sentenced to Life Without Parole at 14 or Younger, and All Are Black
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Afghanistan Is Worse Off Than Ever, Thanks to the Sham Army We're Propping Up
Chris Hedges

More stories by Anthony Papa

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Texas Ranger Josh Hamilton is the new golden boy of baseball. Hamilton's record-breaking performance in Major League Baseball's All-Star Home Run Derby at Yankee Stadium on Monday is a living testament to that fact that people who struggled with drugs in the past can change their lives in a positive way. A few years ago, Hamilton, who developed an addiction to alcohol and drugs -- primarily crack cocaine -- was at a lowest point of his life when he was suspended from baseball for three years.

Instead of giving in to the downward spiral of drug addiction, he made an effort to turn around his life through his love of baseball. After eight stints in rehab, Hamilton was finally able to kick his addiction and return to baseball. While he may not have won the Home Run Derby crown, battling and defeating the monster of addiction makes him a winner.

Hamilton was fortunate that his addiction was not handled as a criminal manner. Instead of having Hamilton deal with his demons behind bars, his addiction was treated as a medical problem, which helped him get his life back on track. Hamilton's story sends a powerful message to society. Individuals who have drug addictions can become productive citizens, if given the chance.

A realistic way to help those who cycle in and out of addiction is to increase community-based treatment. Studies have shown this to be a cost-effective method of reducing drug abuse. Hamilton was lucky enough to be able to afford treatment and get access right away. Most people cannot afford it. And even if they can, they are usually forced to compete for the available treatment slots.

Recent developments in criminal justice indicate the emergence of a national movement in favor of treating, rather than incarcerating people charged with a nonviolent drug possession offense. These developments include drug courts, local policies which favor treatment, and statewide ballot initiatives that divert nonviolent drug offenders to treatment instead of incarceration.

But instead of following this trend, the federal government continues to turn a blind eye toward this movement and steadfastly sticks to zero-tolerance when it comes to illegal drug use. Witness the get-tough policies of ONDCP (Office of National Drug Control Policy) under the direction of John P. Walters. In fact, the ONDCP is so hell-bent on controlling the so-called drug plague that their policies have turned from overly intrusive to downright war-like at times. From suspicionless student drug testing to mandatory minimum sentencing laws that dish out extraordinarily long sentences for small amounts of drugs, the drug war continues be the government's national moral obsession. It is one thing to try to shield society from the harms associated with the drugs, but another when its solutions become worse than the original problems.

We need to implement sensible drug policies that uphold the sovereignty of individuals over their minds and bodies, and are grounded in science, compassion, health and human rights. Maybe then we can give people like Josh Hamilton another chance to make good on their potential.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: drug addiction, josh hamilton

Anthony Papa, author of 15 To Life: How I Painted My Way To Freedom, is a communications specialist for the Drug Policy Alliance.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Not Exactly A "Moral Obsession"...
Posted by: grumble-bum on Jul 18, 2008 5:03 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As someone who has interacted with law enforcement several times in the past in a Drug War-related fashion, I definitely appreciate the swing towards treatment in recent years. I think the author is basically correct in his assessment (although I'm more than annoyed that this option is largely limited to the wealthy- I was lucky enough to find a treatment option that only cost a few grand & managed to make it work, unlike so many).

One thing about his conclusions surprised me, however. While certainly some people who support or implement the War on Drugs do so for moral reasons, the reality is that vast amounts of money flow into State & Federal coffers due to this insanity, money taken from those least able to defend themselves. The real motivation isn't "moral", it's monetary.

Personal property & funds can be seized without real proof of wrong-doing & before trial. To add insult to injury, the "criminal" can be "taxed" both coming & going, either on the value of their supposed drug-derived property or in disproportionate fees & fines. Even if the individual can prove that said property had nothing to do with drugs, it's often absurdly difficult to get it back. & let us not forget the huge industry of the increasingly privatized prison system.

It's like finding free money for these crusaders, & good luck weaning them off their habit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Couple of Things
Posted by: fmcevoy on Jul 19, 2008 4:23 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regarding the Josh Hamilton story, please note:

1. Alcohol/drug treatment is available for anyone who wants it in the U.S. for free.

2. Rehab is a wonderful idea. Yet, from my experience, a rehab's success rate with its clients runs about 10 percent. Wretched? Yes it is. Hamilton went to a number of rehabs, each of which cost thousands of dollars. (Rehab is a cash cow for a lot of people.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Couple of Things Posted by: stewer
» RE: A Couple of Things Posted by: ctaus
Josh likes...
Posted by: ShrubtheWarcriminal on Jul 19, 2008 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to thank god a lot for his rehab. I wonder why his god did not stop him or protect him in the first place?

In addition he thanked God after hitting 28 home runs during the All-Star game. Then God must have thought that was enough as He apparently made Josh lose the contest in the end, even though he had a big lead. God is funny that way. Like when he makes you sick and sometimes heals you. Or when he feels its time for you to go to a "better place."

The announcer even had the rocks to note that "It's a lousy night for atheists."

So does Hamilton LOSING make it a lousy night for Christians? It seems his imaginary Jesus still can’t deliver the goods.

It was a feel good story till that point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

..."The Addiction Business"....
Posted by: picket on Jul 19, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
there are $$$$$trillions of bucks tied to addicting citizens of the world to various products.
The craving associated with cocaine addicting products is severe. To watch crack addicts being lectured by uninformed, uh stupid, authoritative figures is cruel and unusual punishment just for the observer. The brain of the crack cocaine addict is severely physically affected. To see these addicted citizens then thrown into a cold cell and continued to be abused more by society is @#$%^& NUTS.

There is just too much money being made in all areas of this illegal trade to stop the product from being brought to the marketplace.

One USA B2 Steath Bomber costs the American taxpayer one $$$Billion dollars. Eliminate just one Bomber and give each American THAT surplus to work on addiction control we would have the problem solved shortly. Let's see just how much would each of the 300 million American citizens receive???? Does $$$300 million each with some left over, sound right???

Sound like fantasy?

Uncle Sam spends BILLIONS on throwing people in jail for growing a Cannabis plant on their own property and for their own use. Cannabis is NOT a narcotic or is it ADDICTIVE. Those in control of the "underground" market have lots of influence in Washington, so why wouldn't MJ remains illegal?

It's just a crazy world out here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Please keep in mind...
Posted by: thomas_dunn on Jul 19, 2008 1:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There are no "former" drug addicts. Only addicts who have found another way.

And last time I checked, AA/NA didn't require dues or fees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Please keep in mind... Posted by: bluevistas
There are no "bad" drugs or "good" drugs...
Posted by: jimidee on Jul 19, 2008 9:41 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
as drugs, like food, are neutral. There are no "addictive" drugs (or foods) or "habit" forming drugs, there are just people with emotional problems, most of whom are clinically depressed, that are self-medicating. The addicts makes the drugs, the drugs do NOT make the addicts.

There are differences in toxicity and general classes (i.e. stimulants, depressants, etc.) of drugs, so the side effects do vary with some being much harder on the body. Alcohol and tobacco are particularly damaging to the body since they cause a breakdown at the cellular level. However, our drug laws are not based on relative toxicity and disease, but rather on myth and political "realities", or else both alcohol and tobacco would have been banned long ago.

You can play word games (like the cops and politicians do) with this issue all day, but in the end, all psychoactive drugs fall into the same boat, and it is up to the individuals with the emotional problems to choose which one(s) to use to self-medicate, based on which one(s) work for them. The fact is that MOST people use these same "addictive" drugs recreationally and NEVER develop an unhealthy relationship with them. It is one thing to use a drug (taking a little vacation) and totally another to abuse a drug (living there full time). The difference is the emotional problems of the user, not the "addictive" properties of the substance.

The drug war is based on myths like these, where perfectly 'normal' and innocent folks come into contact with the "evil" substance and slide down this slippery slope into addiction. This myth takes personal responsibilty completely out of the equation and is perpetuated by researchers and practicioners alike, who obviously have never experienced the effects of the substances in question. It is just so much easier and simpler to blame an addiction on a substance than to deal with the psychological reasons that the addict is taking it.

Folks assign imaginary labels like "gateway" to drugs that are less effective to self-medicate depression, and reserve terms like "addictive" to the ones that cause more of a euphoric effect. There seems to be even some underlying religious significance to this line of thinking since euphoria is nearly a universal taboo in many religions...something to do with the devil's playground.

That is why our simplistic legal approach and governmental policies are geared towards eradiction of the drug sources, dealers, etc., and not in fixing the emotional problems that are causing the addicts to need to self-medicate all the time. Drug abuse is always a medical problem and never a legal one. The legal system is just the wrong tool for the job.

It is much more complex to think about addiction as a symptom of the problem, which is probably why most folks just don't get it. We don't really have a drug problem, we have a severe clinical depression problem. Some folks just have a hard time living in this "modern" society with its unnatural stresses. Unfortunately, our jails are full of people who do NOT have drug problems but were caught up in either the illegal drug business or simply partaking in recreational use, and therein lies the rub.

It is time that we admit and acknowledge that the so-called drug addicts have serious emotional issues from their childhood that caused them to want to stay fucked-up all the time. We are stuck on the comfortable mythology that if they can just stay away from the substances, that everything will be OK. Most stories of addicts (or obese people) blame the drugs only, instead of the admission that the problems lay within themselves. The same myths lure obese people to have their stomachs stapled, only to realize that even though they are skinny, the underlying problems still exist and that their lives are even more screwed up afterwards.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'd Rather Have A "Treatment Industrial Complex",.....
Posted by: rgoalierob on Jul 20, 2008 7:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
than a "Prison Industrial Complex".

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement