Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

What Does Silence Really Sound Like?

By Marisa Taylor, Ode. Posted July 19, 2008.


Sitting in an anechoic (soundless) chamber, I realized silence isn't golden; it's creepy.
Advertisement

The sky is bright and cloudless: another perfect day in the San Francisco Bay Area. But I'm about to spend part of it inside a windowless, soundless room called an anechoic chamber in an attempt to experience what silence is really like -- and to find out whether it even exists at all.

The word "anechoic" means "without echoes," and an anechoic chamber -- the walls of which are generally lined with wedges of foam to prevent reverberation -- is a room that prevents echoes of the sounds made inside it. Anechoic chambers are used to test microphones and other audio equipment, but the lack of reverb creates a peculiar effect on the ears. They feel stuffy and plugged because, in jarring contrast to the noise encountered throughout the day, the ears aren't getting any feedback from the environment. After sitting in a confined space devoid of echoes for long enough, some people report hearing their own heartbeats, respiration and other bodily functions, a phenomenon termed "auto-emissive noise."

I have to admit I haven't spent much time thinking about silence. With so much noise in the form of honking horns and ringing cellphones plaguing us in everyday life, who has the time -- or the opportunity -- to listen, to wonder what it would be like if the only sound you could hear were your own heart beating? Moreover, who really wants to experience complete silence?

I've heard from others who've spent time in anechoic chambers that it's creepy. It can make you kind of crazy.

So it's with a sense of apprehension as well as excitement that I journey across the Bay Bridge from San Francisco to visit the laboratory of retired University of California, Berkeley psychology professor Ervin Hafter to see the anechoic chamber his team uses for research.

As I approach Tolman Hall, a building nestled among pine trees on a serene corner of the U.C. Berkeley campus, hordes of carefree co-eds spill out the door, finished with morning classes and on their way to lunch. I leave the pleasant sunlight behind and fight the stream of students to enter the building.

Descending a gloomy concrete stairway, I find myself in a grey basement. I'm buzzed into Hafter's subterranean laboratory, and a research assistant leads me down a hallway and into the main office, where a mess of computer equipment and piles of papers dominate the windowless room lit by fluorescents. I'm a bit taken aback by the sterile surroundings and the isolated atmosphere of the basement.

The assistant introduces me to Hafter, who's tall, with solemn brown eyes and wild, wiry tufts of grey hair sprouting from the sides of his head. His khaki-colored button-down shirt still has the fold marks in it. Since 1966, Hafter has studied auditory perception, spatial hearing and the effects of reverberant environments on users of hearing aids and cochlear implants. The anechoic chamber, along with a highly complicated set-up of computer programs and speakers, is required to test human subjects in his laboratory.

"There is no such thing as zero when it comes to sound," he explains as he leads me to the chamber. While zero decibels is technically demarcated as the threshold for the human ability to hear sound, some people can decipher sounds in the negative decibel range. The lack of echo in the anechoic chamber won't change that. The shaggy-haired research assistant, Swapan Gandhi, a musician, tells me he likes being in the chamber because "you hear things that you don't normally pay attention to," like the sound of your own pulse.

Such was the experience of the late avante-garde American composer John Cage, whose trip to the anechoic chamber at Harvard University in Boston, Massachusetts, was the inspiration for his most revolutionary work -- 4'33'', in which a pianist sits silently before a piano for four minutes and 33 seconds. Cage later wrote of his experience that he "heard two sounds, one high and one low. When I described them to the engineer in charge, he informed me that the high one was my nervous system in operation, the low one my blood in circulation."

In Cage's piece, not one musical note is played. Instead, the audience is left to revel in its own subtle sounds and to realize, perhaps, that silence doesn't actually exist.

I'm a musician myself, so Cage is on my mind as Hafter heaves open the door of the chamber, which is about six feet wide and resembles some sort of meat locker. Dim light emanates from two bulbs dangling on either end of the ceiling. My ears immediately feel plugged, as if they've been stuffed full of cotton, probably because the walls and ceiling are lined with rows and rows of fiberglass wedges that absorb all sound waves.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: noise pollution, sound, silence

Marisa Taylor is a freelance journalist who lives in San Francisco.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Some people complain about noise pollution, others about silence being "creepy".
Posted by: jwverez on Jul 19, 2008 3:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
True, there's gotta be a line to draw but when will this madness end?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

napoleon and the infinite
Posted by: nigelbest on Jul 19, 2008 4:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the constant sensory input of physical life is actually a propaganda - telling us that we are physical, limited, finite - receiving and processing sensory data is a form of doing - and we are doing all the time - so that we are strangers to our being - ourselves - our being is actually infinite - but we don't believe this till we experience it - and it is very hard to stop thinking with the finite mind, processing sensory data, memory and imagination - but if we stop doing, including thinking, we experience our being, which is energy, which cannot be created or destroyed, and is also consciousness, infinite consciousness, consciousness of everything at once, consciousness of the whole and essence of life - of existence - and existence is everything - and existence is the meaning of the words, like greek ousia and hebrew yesh (both cognate with english is), that are translated god - god is existence and existence (life, everything, source) is energy and energy is infinite consciousness - energy and matter are ultimately one (e=mc2, quantum) and so everything is energy, which cannot be created and destroyed - we are energy and energy is immortal, as scientists say (not in that word) - energy, which is existence and consciousness, is also love, clarity, wisdom, perspective, truth, reality, 'sunshine', success, infinity - physical world is actually a movie, an illusion, a three dimensional solid movie with the audience inside it - but it is all really energy, and energy is us - to experience this is the heart of all true religious experience, of realisation, of enlightenment - when the greeks say: know yourself, they meant this truth about yourself - when parmenides said: it is good to let lie before you and thus take to heart the being of beings, he is saying the same thing - when the bible says: be still [stop the mind, the sensory processing, the doing] and know [experience] i am [yesh, existence] god [existence, energy] it is saying the same thing - being still [stopping doing, thinking] is the essence of true meditation and prayer - true prayer is stopping doing and then noticing the infinite energy that is the reality of everything - tilopa put it this way: do not think, do not imagine, do not reflect, do not analyse, do not meditate: leave the mind in its natural state - the chinese put it this way: become like a block of wood - just stop, totally stop - we seek fulfillment in the world - but there is infinity in us, as us - our true nature, our real self is energy, which is also consciousness love clarity peace existence everything life harmony fulfillment etc - all the time we are looking in the world, there is infinity inside us, as us - but we refuse to believe it - we are determined to be certain that it isn't so - we don't like to have been wrong a long time - so we just say: it isn't ('couldn't possibly be') true - we don't seek, we don't check it out - we go on with this inner thirst for more than physical life ever gives us, and we don't find it - until we are ready to give it a try - and we refuse to give it a try until we are really desperate - isn't that funny - we should ask ourselves: where does this thirst for more than physical life can give us come from? - it comes from our selves, our true selves, hidden by the constant propaganda of physical life, that we are physical - it aint so - we are both physical (finite) and infinite - that is what religion is supposed to be all about, but religion often doesn't know what religion is all about - go as long as you like, determined to believe that you are just physical finite mortal - reality doesn't care - and one day you'll get tired of being sure and you'll check it out

napolean asked to be left alone in the king's chamber of the great pyramid, and came out after a time looking rather pale - being ourselves, completely stopping doing, and just being is so foreign, so unsuspected a possibility -

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: nigelbest
» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: nigelbest
» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: nigelbest
» I dunno, but pass me some! Posted by: Smackback
» You are a Product of Evolution Posted by: LeaderofMen
» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: oregonox
» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: nigelbest
» Nigel Beast Posted by: grim ripper
» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: undrgrndgirl
» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: nigelbest
» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: mcstewey
» RE: napoleon and the infinite Posted by: nigelbest
"It can make you kind of crazy."
Posted by: amphead on Jul 19, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A new torture technique? The CIA will be on this like stink on shit.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Silence is not creepy
Posted by: McKinnon on Jul 19, 2008 6:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This writer provides alot of visual description of the "silence chamber". Perhaps that's what made the lack of noise so creepy. I have a house out in the country. I love the silence in the morning, the few minutes before homo sapiens and all those machines crank up for another day of money grubbing. Silence is not creepy. The idea that silence is creepy is creepy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Silence is not creepy Posted by: AMERICAN VETERAN
» RE: Silence is not creepy Posted by: sirios
» RE: Silence is not creepy Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: deprivation tanks Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: Silence is not creepy Posted by: thealltheone
» RE: Silence is not creepy Posted by: Gulliver
» RE: Silence is not creepy Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: Silence is not creepy Posted by: marilee
what about the BEER?
Posted by: cocopuffed on Jul 19, 2008 6:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
did you get the case of guiness?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: what about the BEER? Posted by: mcstewey
Facing the sea...
Posted by: Sinibaldi on Jul 19, 2008 11:46 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A delicate and
soft wind is
blowing near an
empty space,
while the curtain
covers a silky
notepaper describing
a picture and the
love for the youth;
I call you my
darkness, I wait
for a dream......

Francesco Sinibaldi

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

try the desert
Posted by: orionsan on Jul 19, 2008 2:02 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
it can be bone silent
when the winds are still

this author creeped himself out
had nothing to do with silence

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: try the desert Posted by: marilee
Deafness?
Posted by: benzene on Jul 19, 2008 5:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It seems to me that something was lacking from this article:
A comparison of how the sensations of the anechoic chamber stack up against natural deafness.

The author made some good connections between noise and our societies. But the biology of this would also have been insightful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wait a sec.
Posted by: talkville on Jul 19, 2008 11:32 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where, in the natural world, this world we all inhabit, does an "anechoic" chamber exist? Where does a 'vacuum' exist?

Testing the positive and negative aspects of this concept Silence in such circumstances is not precisely a human thing. Unless we're all to enclose the Planet in an 'Anechoic' chamber; where would this silence creep then? Why do some hate nature and the physical universe SO much?? Tutankhamen was found in such an 'anechoic' chamber -- I don't wanna be King Tut!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fear of stillness
Posted by: sirios on Jul 20, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
going into one of these chambers gives us the opportunity to discover where the real noise lies, in our own obsessive thinking. the "creepiness" of silence is not inherent in silence, but in the fear that our own minds generate when our indentification with mental noise is challenged by stillness that dissolves mental indentification.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"tell me a thing or to"
Posted by: blogbooks on Jul 20, 2008 3:02 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Microsoft Word's automatic spell check has failed you yet again.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Music
Posted by: iluvatar on Jul 20, 2008 5:44 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
MUSIC
There's music in all things, if men had ears: Their earth is but an echo of the spheres.
~Lord Byron
In 1951 composer John Cage, wishing to experience complete silence, entered an anechoic chamber at Harvard University where he “heard two sounds, one high and one low.” The sounds, he was told, were his “nervous system in operation” and “blood in circulation” respectively. Cage’s anechoic experience led to his composition “4:33” (Four minutes and thirty-three seconds) in which the musicians were to make no sounds for the duration of the performance, thus allowing the audience to experience the dynamic flux of ambient sounds surrounding them.
Thirty-two years earlier, H. Ellis Reed and his father wandered the hills around Hollywood in search of a suitable location for a community open-air theater. One day they came upon a gentle slope descending into a large bowl shaped depression. To their delight, father and son were able to converse without raising their voices even when separated by a great distance. They had found a natural amphitheater—the Hollywood Bowl. After the famous reflecting shell was installed in 1932, one critic noted that “The faintest tones of the violin are clearly audible in the most remote seats”—over 500 feet away.
The opening of the Hollywood freeway in 1952 introduced traffic noise to the amphitheater. In spite of efforts to abate the intrusive noise, development of the area continued to disturb the venue’s natural acoustics. Tests by the California Division of Highways revealed that by 1959, traffic noise in the amphitheater had increased significantly over values observed in 1954. The loudest sounds were from “aircraft,” and the loudest, most persistent ground traffic noise was produced by trucks. “Equally loud noise of shorter duration [was] produced by…sports cars and motorcycles…all of which could undoubtedly be quieted by more adequate muffling.” The FAA agreed to avoid flight over the Bowl during the 2001 summer concert season, when possible, to “minimize noise for concert audiences.” This diversion of aircraft noise away from the Hollywood Bowl to some other place implies that the time of some, regarding the world of sound, had been deemed to be of less value than that of others. Somewhere, jet noise drowned out a favorite song, obscured a baby’s first words and interrupted conversations so that others could listen to a few bars of Berlioz.
The whole of humanity is an audience to the Music of the spheres. In the absence of sound John Cage heard sounds he had not noticed before. Imagine traveling back in time to the Hollywood Bowl of 1920 or any location of those days to attend a performance of 4:33, that is, to close your eyes and open your mind’s ears and listen intently for a spell. What would be experienced—heard, felt and cherished—in those times that would go unnoticed today?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the absence of noise
Posted by: sirios on Jul 20, 2008 6:23 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the article is really refering to is the absence of noise, not real silence or the stillness of conciousness that is aware of itself and only itself ,thus no noise. real stillness is peaceful, safe and infinitly NOT creepy. It is what the creeped out mind continually searches for in objects and yet can only be located in that where the mind cannot enter while still indentified with the" noise "of thoughts.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Noise" - Tim Robbin's film: "a metaphor for power"
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jul 21, 2008 5:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
IMDB

Trailer: ...at what point does the protection of someone else's possession permit the infringement upon one's neighbours?

Tim Robbins wages crusade against noise in new film, By Silvia Aloisi

ROME (Reuters) - Have you ever dreamt of smashing up that car in your neighborhood whose burglar alarm has the bad habit of going off in the middle of the night?

U.S. director Henry Bean used to do that just that, breaking into other people's cars to disable their alarms, so he could get a good night's sleep. He ended up in court and in jail, until he decided to stop and make a film about it.

"Noise", Bean's provocative second film, casts Tim Robbins as David, an upper-class family man driven insane by New York's loud sounds -- grinding garbage trucks, horns honking, back-up beepers and worst of all, car alarms squealing at all hours.

He becomes so obsessed with noise that he turns into a black-clad vigilante, "The Rectifier", waging his own crusade on those damn alarms shattering his quiet.
...
"Going out to break into a car whose alarm had been going off for hours, getting arrested, going to jail, appearing before a judge, all that happened to me, I did that," Bean, who lives in New York, told reporters after his film premiered at the Rome festival to critical acclaim.

"When I got arrested I had already been doing it a lot. I had been doing it for years. But when I spent the night in jail and it cost me several thousands dollars, I began to think I wasn't getting anywhere by pursuing it in this way," he said.

"I confess that a couple of times I could not control myself afterwards & I went out & did it again & didn't get arrested those times ... In fact you'll never find a policeman who will tell you that these things (car alarms) do any good whatsoever," he said.

METAPHOR FOR POWER

The film is Bean's witty, often laugh-out-loud funny second installment in a trilogy exploring religious, political and artistic fanaticism.

His first film "The Believer", about a Jewish man who becomes a neo-Nazi skinhead, won the Grand Jury prize at the Sundance festival in 2001 but was so controversial that no major U.S. distributor picked it up. Bean has also worked as a writer for films such as "Basic Instinct 2".

Despite his own personal battle against car alarms, which according to Bean "should be totally illegal", the director said his film was, above all, about the disconnect that he feels exists between those in power and their citizens.

"For me, noise becomes a metaphor for power. The noise that I have to listen to, that I have no control over, that invades my house, my ears, my thoughts... in a way that's how our governments are," he said.

"We live in a world where the governments are extremely unresponsive to what the citizens want."


┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄
BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian
┄┄
""... tolerance of intolerance is cowardice" ~ Ayaan Hirsi Ali.
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
┄┄
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄┄

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]