Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Progressives Have a Big Tent at the Dem Convention

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted July 14, 2008.


A tent for 800 journalists, bloggers and activists will be set up at Denver's Democratic Convention site.
Advertisement

Few activities are more filled with political insiders than national political party conventions. But this August in Denver, a coalition of progressive groups hopes to broaden the coverage and conversation surrounding the Democratic Convention by hosting 800 bloggers, nonprofit leaders and independent journalists.

ProgressNow.org, the largest online community in Colorado; the Alliance for a Sustainable Colorado; and Daily Kos will put up a big tent next to the Pepsi Center, where writers, bloggers and activists can cover the convention and showcase a progressive agenda.

"There are two things we want to accomplish," said Bobby Clark, ProgressNow deputy director. "The first is to give access to people who are often left out, who don't have a seat at the table. This is not just bloggers, but independent media and nonprofit leaders. It's about access."

"We also want to broaden the conversation during the convention," he said. "We will be hit over the head by the mainstream media with political process stories. Lost in that coverage will be the fact that 48 million Americans don't have health insurance and issues like that. So we want to generate content that can get out that week."

An estimated 15,000 members of the media are expected to go to Denver, with approximately 5,000 receiving credentials to attend the official proceedings. Only 125 bloggers will be credentialed.

The solution is called "the big tent," a 9,000-square-foot, two-story, fully wired platform for alternative coverage and a stage for newsmakers that will be a counterpoint to the usual convention activities such as the adoption of the party platform; nomination of both a vice presidential and presidential candidate; speeches and rallying of campaign workers by party leaders; and a not-insignificant amount of elbow-rubbing by political insiders.

"There is a bigger conversation we want to have," Clark said. "The political process is one way to accomplish change. But that is not the only way to do it. A blogger spending 20 hours a week above their day job doing work that is not in the press is another way. Another is solutions from the country's progressive leaders."

The air-conditioned tent will accommodate 800 people, Clark said. It will be on a lot next to the Alliance Center, a green building that is home to a range of nonprofits such as Common Cause, the Sierra Club, Center for Native Ecosystems and others. It is walking distance from the convention site. Sponsors also include Digg.com, Google.com and YouTube.com.

Many bloggers and independent journalists have complained that the convention press credential process (like the GOP, the Democratic Party stopped accepting applications this past April 15) excluded them and suppressed voices that were not from mainstream media organizations. Clark said the big tent idea, which is new to national political conventions, created a solution that the party supports.

"There has been some dialogue on the blogs," he said, referring to frustration with official credentials. "One reason we wanted to do this was we anticipated that not as many bloggers would be accommodated. The convention committee is happy that we are doing this. They wanted there to be more bloggers who are coming. There is so much pressure on everyone. We also have way more requests than we can accommodate."

The big tent site is outside the convention's security perimeter, which has been the focus of other recent reports concerning how the city's police will allow protests and other First Amendment activities. In Denver, local police have reportedly allocated $5 million to buy new weapons for convention security. While law enforcement has voiced concerns about possible terrorism, activists who are planning anti-war and immigrant rights demonstrations in Denver are wary of police intentions.

In Denver, like in cities that have hosted previous national political conventions, there have been confirmed reports of spying by police on activists and organizations who want to express their views while the nation is focusing on the presidential nominee. One disturbing twist this year is reports that local police will be equipped with weapons designed for use in the war in Iraq.

Police will not comment; however, news organizations have reported that police may be buying exotic equipment such as pepper-ball rifles to control unruly crowds and guns that fire a rubbery mass that keeps people and vehicles from moving. Congress has appropriated $100 million to assist with security at the Democratic and Republican conventions.

Clark said he did not know what law enforcement officials' plans were.

"I hope that everyone is able to exercise their free speech rights," he said, referring to anti-war, immigrant rights and other groups that reportedly were planning demonstrations in Denver.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: progressives, dnc, election 2008, denver, big tent, bobby clark

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election, with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
LOL ... What a Joke !
Posted by: mmckinl on Jul 14, 2008 1:52 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where are the so called Progressives when it comes to The Green Party Convention or any of the other parties that have Presidential candidates?

Sure they will not win, but the Progressives, a group that prides itself on discussing all ideas this boast of some tent falls much short of credibility.

All I see is a big clusterfuck of psuedo inertia that will end in a bunch of self congratulatory angst.

If you really want to stir the pot, cover all the candidates and what they say. Anything else is cooptation.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: LOL ... What a Joke ! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: LOL ... What a Joke ! Posted by: blueapples26
» Fascism = Corporatism Posted by: perkywa
» RE: LOL ... What a Joke ! Posted by: mmckinl
» Psuedo Cluster fucking Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Psuedo Cluster fucking Posted by: mmckinl
» RE: Psuedo Cluster fucking Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: Psuedo Cluster fucking ...LOL Posted by: foreverhope
» It is obvious..... Posted by: foreverhope
» RE: It is obvious..... Posted by: mmckinl
» RE: It is obvious..... Posted by: foreverhope
another propaganda puff piece.....
Posted by: blueapples26 on Jul 14, 2008 7:35 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
any learned, critical thinking, reasoned human being would realize that this is a charade to sugar up and pacify the progressive community. The sponsors of this “set up” I mean event comes from the bastion of “left progressive free thinking” thank you Edward Bernaise “corporation”, oxymoronic isn’t it, such as google, the nice folks who have given up many a Chinese folk to the PLA for speaking their mind. I wonder if they keep count, probably not. The next one is “digg”, another big fasci censor corp who has buried many a story not their sponsor (fascist) liking. Btw I came up with 1,160,000 “google” hits with Digg.com and censorship, not scientific, I know, but worth thinking about. I don’t have to get into the third sponsor “you tube”. Since they are owned by google who believes free speech is only for the folk who run the place, the place is our planet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Progressive Credibility
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jul 14, 2008 8:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Much of the progressive media lost their credibility as objective sources of news with their continued attacks on Hillary Clinton and their lack of substantial coverage on Obama and of important issues. The coverage of the primary campaign was eye opening and reinforced that one has to go to many different sources of news and information to get the complete picture. I'm hoping that there will be informative coverage of the platforms and policies to emerge from the convention. We the People deserve to know what is being decided on our behalf behind closed doors and in committees.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Progressive Credibility Posted by: blueapples26
A Big Tent?
Posted by: oregoncharles on Jul 14, 2008 10:08 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Walking distance" from the convention?

The first commenter is right: this is a joke.

It's called a "consolation prize", or maybe "mercy sex": "Let them have their tent, over there somewhere, while they bend over and take it any way we want to do it to them."

And that, progressives, is your reward for your all-out support of Obama.

Wake up and smell the coffee: there ARE alternatives, and they need your help.

And frankly, you'd do a lot more good out on the street trying to shut down the convention than in your silly tent.

Well, if we're lucky all this will come back to haunt the Dems in November: the more votes for McKinney, the stronger the message.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Link to nowhere?
Posted by: greenjay on Jul 14, 2008 10:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went to the url for the Big Tent. Looks wonderful, HOWEVER: the link to sign up and pay $100 for AC and the fabulous company of other bloggers goes NOWHERE.

I tried the "Contact Us" link, and apparently that isn't working yet either.

You should contact the source for this information and have them get their stories straight before they advertise.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An even bigger "tent"
Posted by: perkywa on Jul 14, 2008 10:47 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
will be set up for the protesters who are foolish enough to show up and venture outside of their designated "free speech zone". This "tent" might be confused with a detention center since it will be surrounded by barbed wire and police/homeland security personnel.

Don't worry you wont see it on TV and the attendees of the convention wont see it either since it will be a couple of miles from the convention (just like the designated "free speech zone"). The first poster is right "WHAT A JOKE"...that goes for the country as a whole.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What needs to be said to Obama
Posted by: willymack on Jul 14, 2008 11:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First. Most Democratic Americans strongly disapprove of your Yea vote on FISA, considering it tatamount to siding with evil. Second, you MUST prosecute the bushies for multiple capital crimes, and lesser ones, too numerous to mention. Third, tou must get us out of the Iraq meat grinder ASAP. Fourth, rather than increasing our military might, you should reduce it to one third its current strength, bring our military personnel back from Korea, Japan, and Germany, and end the cozy relationship between industry and our military. If this involves cashiering senior military officers and putting crooks in jail ,so be it. Fifth. you MUST call for a Constitutional Convention with the elimimation of the hopelessly corrupt Electoral College foremost on the agenda, and to hell with the uproar from Congress and the Senate. Our people are far more important than political hacks. Sixth, you Must reinstate and re-invigorate anti-trust laws, and restore our communications media as free and unfettered reporters of the TRUTH. Seventh. You MUST restore habeus corpus, posse comitatus, the Fourth Amendment, and punish all those who violated them. Eighth, you MUST immediately close Guantanamo and release ALL those currently imprisoned there, UNCONDIDIONALLY. Ninth. You MUST eliminate the "Patriot" act, "Homeland Security", all faith-based inititatives, and "No Child Left Behind". This'll do for a start. When all this is accomplished, you should look to us who you work for to learn what else needs to be done.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What needs to be said to Obama Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: What needs to be said to Obama Posted by: libertybill
Divide and Conquer
Posted by: bobtr900 on Jul 20, 2008 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We must ask ourselves are we helping them, the Rethugs, divide us and then conquer us. To the extent that some of us fight each other then we are helpiung them do their evil deeds, their "dirty deeds done dirt cheap", per AC/DC. Why would we ever want to do that. Are we going to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory.

Rove and his neocons, Frank Luntz, have set up a perfect scenario for us to defeat ourselves. On almost every issue we are damned if we do and damned if we don't.

We should be listening to people like Chomsky, Lakoff and Nunberg, all linguists, to understand what Rove and Luntz have done. They have us twisting in the wind and almost everything we do just further tightens the noose. Naomi Wolf clearly points out their use of Hitlerian tactics. So let's stop in-fighting, read more and use our higher brain functions to reason our way out of this mess of death they have created for us, all 240+ million of us, who did not vote for the Bushie Rethugs.

So we feel strongly that the Dems have let us down. But remember they too have been reframed to the right. They have lost sight of true democratic party velues, and my guess is they know it. That's why Rep. David Obey so often screamed out they did not have enough votes to do anything, including impeach.

Let us ALL reason together. The right wingers and their RR's are the true enemy, not we ourselves. The best way to attack them is to vote as a tightly formed voting bloc. Let us make absolutely sure we do not lose or give away even one vote.

The real and true test of the Dems will be when or if they win and then should they do nothing to re-form the ship of state, then we will all know that they are lost, abolished, as Rove saud he would do, or at least rendered impotent, which is the same thing.

Should the American people give the Dems a 'super majority' as the Rethugs held for most of the Bushie prez, and further should the Dems not use it then we will know that they are gone, impotent, and possibly gone forever. Then and only then will I move to another party like the Green Party or possibly even the Libertarian Party. If for no other reason then to make them stronger and a wedge with which to divide and conquer the Dems and Rethugs.

So let us NOT make any hasty decisions until about a year after the 2008 elections and we get a clear picture of what is happening, and what has happened to the Dems. Should the Dems not get a 'super majority' in the Fall we will have to look at how much they have accomplished and then decide.

I will not waver from that position. I'll not be a part of the self defeat that the Rethugs have planned for us. In the long term what America really needs is about three more political parties. Two parties are not enough, and a clear danger to our democracy. It is too easy for one to gain all the power and render the other helpless, which in turn renders our nation helpless.

The Rethug party is an evil cabal for business profits. And their RR's are almost equally as evil. People are dying and getting maimed as a result of their cabal.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]