Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

A War on Iran Would Be Like Another War on Iraq

By Patrick Cockburn, Independent UK. Posted July 7, 2008.


With covert operations against Iran poised to be carried out from Iraqi territory, Iranian retaliation would target the already embattled country.
Advertisement

Iraq will be plunged into a new war if Israel or the U.S. launches an attack on Iran, Iraqi leaders have warned. Iranian retaliation would take place in Iraq, said Dr. Mahmoud Othman, the influential Iraqi MP.

The Iraqi government's main allies are the U.S. and Iran, whose governments openly detest each other. The Iraqi government may be militarily dependent on the 140,000 U.S. troops in the country, but its Shia and Kurdish leaders have long been allied to Iran. Iraqi leaders have to continually perform a balancing act in which they seek to avoid alienating either country.

The balancing act has become more difficult for Iraq since George Bush successfully requested $400m (£200m) from Congress last year to fund covert operations aimed at destabilizing the Iranian leadership. Some of these operations are likely to be launched from Iraqi territory with the help of Iranian militants opposed to Tehran. The most effective of these opponent groups is the Mujahedin-e-Khalq (MEK), which enraged the Iraqi government by staging a conference last month at Camp Ashraf, north-east of Baghdad. It demanded the closure of the Iranian embassy and the expulsion of all Iranian agents in Iraq. "It was a huge meeting" said Dr. Othman. "All the tribes and political leaders who are against Iran, but are also against the Iraqi government, were there." He said the anti-Iranian meeting could not have taken place without U.S. permission.

The Americans disarmed the 3,700 MEK militants, who had long been allied to Saddam Hussein, at Camp Ashraf in 2003, but they remain well-organized and well-financed. The extent of their support within Iran remains unknown, but they are extremely effective as an intelligence and propaganda organization.

Though the MEK is on the State Department's list of terrorist groups, the Pentagon and other U.S. institutions have been periodically friendly to it. The U.S. task force charged by Bush with destabilizing the Iranian government is likely to co-operate with it.

In reaction to the conference, the Iraqi government, the U.S. and the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) have started secret talks on the future of the MEK with the Iraqi government pressing for their expulsion from Iraq. Dr. Othman, who speaks to the MEK frequently by phone, said: "I pressed them to get out of Iraq voluntarily because they are a card in the hands of the Americans."

An embarrassing aspect of the American pin-prick war against Iran is that many of its instruments were previously on the payroll of Saddam Hussein. The MEK even played a role in 1991 in helping to crush the uprising against the Baathist regime at the end of the Gulf war. The dissidents from Arab districts in southern Iran around Ahwaz were funded by Saddam Hussein's intelligence organizations, which orchestrated the seizure of the Iranian embassy in London in 1980 which was supposedly carried out by Arab nationalists from Iran.

The one community in Iran most likely to oppose the Tehran government is the Iranian Kurds. There have been an increasing number of attacks by PJAK, the Iranian wing of the Turkish PKK, which claims to be a separate party. Based in the Kandil mountains in Iraqi Kurdistan, PJAK has carried out frequent raids into Iran and has reportedly been able to win local support. But it would be extremely dangerous for the U.S. to be seen as a supporter of PJAK as this would offend the Turks who have a military co-operation agreement with Iran against terrorism.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: iran, iraq, saddam hussein, george bush, kurdistan, mahmoud othman, mujahedin-e-khalq, camp ashraf, international committee o

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Another fine Mess!
Posted by: carbon-based on Jul 7, 2008 5:12 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Problem is America, and the west in general do not seem to fully understand the intricate affiliations that have formed over hundreds of years between these tribes/groups.

Every turn we make is met with opposition or insult leading to another confrontation. Bush 2 never seemed to understand what Bush 1 did. Sometimes it pays to listen to dad!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The more likely it is that Obama will win...
Posted by: Artkansas on Jul 7, 2008 11:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The more likely it is that Bush will attack Iran.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Homework...
Posted by: Captainmagic on Jul 7, 2008 11:00 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Do you think that the Iranians have been sitting on their hands for the past.... for the past...oh i don't know...millenia. Do you think the Iranians might have a few enemy of my enemy type friends in Iraq....Do you think that El Sadra types have not organised for just such an event....Do you think that civiians, both Iraqi and Iranian will not bear the brunt of an Amerikan/Isreali attack on Iran...Do you think there won't be, world condemnation for any attack.
Think WWII and what the French resistance did to the Nazi's at the launch of the attack on Iran...Oooops.. on D-Day...Hello chickens,...comming home to roost are we?

Think, Brothers we are one!! Arise against the infidel..see their real intent in our lands...they come for our oil and butcher our women and children

Think mobile bomb squads positioned globally to bomb the crap out of a B52 or three.

Need I go on!!!

I read so many understatements in bloggs these days...the sheer gravity of posturing Bu$hCo clusterf@#k's is cause for great alarm. So what happens if China, India and Russia were to align themselves with Iran.Mmmmmmm

Please remember you bought it!!!It has cost you an enourmous amount to date....more than you may want to know...Aka Iran.

Reducing the cost of oil by attacking Iran...now there's an intelligent approach, not bordering on the insane..just simply, *INSANE*

Captain OUT

There is no doubt as to where the blame lies..pun intended.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Homework... Posted by: symcokid