Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

McCain the Reformer? You've Got to Be Joking

By Ari Berman, The Nation. Posted July 1, 2008.


The level of John McCain's ties to lobbyists has reached dizzying proportions.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Ari Berman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

In early April John McCain held a top-dollar fundraiser at Washington's Willard Hotel, where President Ulysses S. Grant invented the term "lobbyist." It was a fitting locale, as the election-reform group Public Campaign noted, since thirty-five of the forty-three hosts for the evening were registered lobbyists. The following week Rick Davis -- on leave from his job as a lobbyist to work as McCain's campaign manager -- gave a strategy presentation to lobbyists from the oil, utility and nuclear power industries, soliciting campaign contributions.

McCain's ties to K Street began attracting attention, and a month later two of his key operatives were forced to resign after the press revealed that they'd lobbied for the Burmese dictatorship. A top McCain fundraiser, former Congressman Tom Loeffler, also got his walking papers after lobbying McCain on behalf of Saudi Arabia. In the space of ten days, five McCain lobbyists-turned-staffers left his campaign. Those who remained included senior adviser Charlie Black -- formerly one of the most high-profile Republican lobbyists in Washington, who has represented the likes of Iraqi exile Ahmad Chalabi, mercenary contractor Blackwater and Philippine dictator Ferdinand Marcos. One could be forgiven for wondering, Was anyone in McCain's inner circle not a lobbyist?

Coziness between lawmakers and lobbyists is an old story in Washington, but in McCain's case such entanglements threaten to derail his maverick mystique. After his humiliating involvement in the Keating Five corruption scandal in the late 1980s, McCain worked tirelessly to cultivate a reputation as a chastened reformer. In the following years he made campaign-finance reform -- specifically banning unlimited "soft money" donations -- a near crusade, working closely with Democratic Senator Russ Feingold and angering many Republicans. Embracing campaign-finance reform became a useful way for McCain to differentiate himself from his earlier incarnation and from the DeLays and Gingriches and Bushes who were corrupting the Republican Party. Yet his second run for the presidency, with its emphasis on courting conservative Republicans, highlights the fact that McCain has morphed back into a quintessential creature of Washington -- just another politician who uses the issue of reform when it suits his agenda.

For McCain, there is no better example of how the image of reform has obscured the intersection of corporate donations and DC lobbyists than the Reform Institute. A nonprofit with an Orwellian name, the institute was founded by McCain and his allies a year after his failed 2000 campaign. Billed as "a non-partisan election reform organization whose Honorary Chair is Senator John McCain," the institute wasn't really nonpartisan, and McCain was far more than an honorary chair. "It was predicated on McCain's political connections," says Robert Crane of the JEHT Foundation, a social justice organization in New York and one of the Reform Institute's past funders. "It wasn't an independent entity." To be sure, the institute did some good work at the state level in support of clean elections, but it always remained a John McCain protection agency.

The Reform Institute paid for McCain to give speeches and host town hall meetings, touted him in press releases and cultivated his donor list. The group was housed in the same offices as McCain's PAC, his re-election committee and Rick Davis's lobbying firm, Davis Manafort, which represented telecommunications and gambling interests along with foreign governments like Nigeria and Ukraine. The staff included McCain's campaign manager, Davis, as president; his chief fundraiser, Carla Eudy; and his Internet consultant, Rebecca Donatelli. It was incorporated by McCain counsel Trevor Potter, with seed money from former Merrill Lynch CEO Herb Allison, McCain's finance chairman in 2000. McCain was chairman of the board from 2001 until 2005. Meanwhile, Davis earned $395,000 for three years of work, Eudy took in $294,000 as a consultant and treasurer, and McCain policy guru John Raidt made $145,000 in 2006, to give one example of how the Reform Institute padded the coffers of McCain's political brain trust.

At the outset, the organization's primary purpose was defending McCain's campaign-finance legislation, McCain-Feingold, before Congress, the Federal Election Commission and the Supreme Court. But even as McCain was pushing that bill, he was also gaming the campaign-finance system. The fact that a registered lobbyist was running an entity called the Reform Institute was not the only reason the group raised eyebrows in Washington.

As a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, the Reform Institute could accept the kinds of unlimited tax-deductible contributions that McCain's PAC and re-election committee could not. Longtime McCain donors like California businessman William Bloomfield, former Houston Astros owner John McMullen and businessman and former diplomat Robert Stuart gave more than $50,000 each to the institute. According to Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington, the largest donors to the institute also gave a combined $305,985 to McCain and his PACs. More unlikely funders included liberal foundations eager to find GOP allies on campaign-finance reform, like George Soros's Open Society Institute, the San Francisco-based Tides Foundation and the David Geffen Foundation. A number of donors who gave almost exclusively to Democrats also wrote large checks. So did wealthy executives who saw that giving to a McCain-affiliated nonprofit could be good for business. This category included insurance giant AIG (formerly run by McCain backer Hank Greenberg) and television interests like Univision, Cablevision and Echosphere.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: john mccain, lobbying, k street

Ari Berman is a contributing writer for The Nation, covering national politics and the 2008 election, and an Investigative Journalism Fellow at The Nation Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Obama to expand Bush's faith-based programs
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jul 1, 2008 3:29 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Reaching out to evangelical voters, Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama is announcing plans that would expand President Bush's program steering federal social service dollars to religious groups and — in a move sure to cause controversy — support their ability to hire and fire based on faith."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Obama's Evolving Position on Iran
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jul 1, 2008 5:38 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In his speech Wednesday before the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee, Obama sounded a bit like the more hawkish officials in the Bush administration.

Sen. Barack Obama's, D-Ill., position on whether to meet with the leaders of rogue nations such as Iran has evolved. He said the military option is "on the table" for dealing with Iran's nuclear program, and in stark contrast to earlier statements, he said he would meet with Iranian leaders "if and only if it can advance the interest of the United States."

Obama's tone was strikingly different from it has been in the past.

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/Vote2008/story?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

For sure, McCain will be no reformer when it comes to alcohol abuse
Posted by: HughScott on Jul 1, 2008 8:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On June 22, 2008, the L.A. Times published the following article about Mrs. McCain and few news outlets carried the story:

Hensley & Co., one of the nation's major beer wholesalers, has brought the family of Cindy McCain wealth, prestige and influence in Phoenix, but it could also create conflicts for her husband, Sen. John McCain, if he is elected president in November.

Founded by Cindy McCain's late father, Hensely has opposed such groups as Mothers Against Drunk Driving in fighting proposed federal rules requiring alcohol content information on every package of beer, wine and liquor.

Hensley has run afoul of health advocacy groups that have tried to rein in appeals to young drinkers. For example, the company distributes caffeinated alcoholic drinks that public health groups say put young and underage consumers at risk by disguising the effects of intoxication.

Cindy McCain holds the title of company chairwoman and controls about 68% of the privately held company stock with her children and the senator's son, according to records at the Arizona Department of Liquor License and Control. Cindy and John McCain keep their finances separate, and he has no stake or role in Hensley.

In an interview in May, she said she knew "everything that is going on" and communicated with her executive team every day. She added that she did not need to be at headquarters to be in charge. So far, she has given no hint of what changes, if any, she envisions. "That's very premature," she said.

The McCain campaign issued a statement Friday about the issue, saying that "any decisions going forward will be made when John McCain wins the election and takes office, and not before." Hensley executives declined to comment.

Political analysts said they were astounded that the presumptive Republican nominee had not already addressed the issue.

A close look at Hensley shows that the company has opposed changes that critics of the beer industry say were intended to help Americans drink responsibly.

Hensley's lobbying activities have put the company at the center of a battle that has raged between the beer and liquor industries since Prohibition ended. Under federal law, liquor is taxed more heavily than beer and must contain a label that discloses alcohol content by percentage or proof. Beer and wine containers have no such disclosure requirement, though alcohol content varies widely.

Aside from the labeling issue, Hensley has begun distributing controversial products known as flavored malt beverages, which critics call "alcopops" because of their similarity to soda pop.

The beer industry, including Hensley, responded by also moving into the market with such products as Tilt, a caffeinated alcoholic drink made by Anheuser-Busch.

Critics say the product is directed mainly at youth and can leave them wide awake without knowing they are intoxicated. Other flavored malt beverages contain sweet fruit flavors that block the taste of alcohol.

"These products are starter beverages, intended to introduce consumers to alcohol and alcohol brands," said George Hacker, director of the Alcohol Policies Project at the Center for Science in the Public Interest.

KEEP DRUNK DRIVERS OFF OUR HIGHWAYS. VOTE FOR BARACK OBAMA!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent post
Posted by: PaulC on Jul 1, 2008 8:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It really digs into the murky facts surrounding the way these neocon RepubliThugs operate. The one constant defining everything they do is the very classic marketing tactic - if you plan to do something illegal or unethical or deceitful, market yourself as the exact opposite in order to inoculate yourself against attack.

That and scapegoating constitute the core RepubliThug strategy. It is very simple and very effective.

peace,
Paul

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

McSame a reformer? What a laugh!
Posted by: Old Skeptic on Jul 1, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you loved Bush's almost 8 years of incompetence and wannabe-tyranny, you'd really love McSame, as he sinks Social Security, takes away your company-sponsored health insurance (for those who still have it), keeps us in Iraq for 100 years, and generally just provides Bush with his third term! What Bush couldn't manage to destroy, McSame will finish off. Some reformer, huh?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

saveusall
Posted by: saveusall on Jul 1, 2008 12:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's play connect the dots - hmmmm - how does this group of people fit into SAIC (check the article on SAIC in VANITY FAIR, March 2007)...and then....

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Thinking
Posted by: pana on Jul 2, 2008 1:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Watch out for McCain and his wife, Cindy. Both are evil. Do you really want to have to support them for the rest of their lives and yours?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]