COMMENTS: 89
The Five Secret Billion-Dollar Companies Sucking Obscene Amounts of Taxpayer Money
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
Now, imagine that, due to a little more Pentagon/Bush administration wizardry, even this black budget estimate is undoubtedly a low-ball figure. One reason is simple enough: The proposed $541 billion Pentagon 2009 budget doesn't even include money for actual wars. George W. Bush's wars are all paid for by "supplemental" bills like the $162 billion one Congress will soon pass -- so the Department of Defense's $34 billion black budget skips "war-related funding." This means that even the overall figure for that budget remains darker than we might imagine (as in "black hole"). The Pentagon not only produces stealth planes, it is, in budgetary terms, a stealth operation. If honestly accounted, the actual Pentagon yearly budget, including all the "military-related" funds salted away elsewhere, is probably now more than $1 trillion a year.
There is, however, another stealth side to the Pentagon -- the corporate side where a range of giant companies you've never heard of are gobbling up our tax dollars at phenomenal rates. Nick Turse, author of the single best account of how our lives are being militarized, our civilian economy Pentagonized, and the Pentagon privatized -- I'm talking about The Complex: How the Military Invades Our Everyday Lives -- now turns to the stealth corporate side of the Pentagon to give us a glimpse into the larger black hole into which our dollars pour. -- Intro by TomDispatch editor, Tom Engelhardt
Billion-Dollar Babies
Five Stealth Pentagon Contractors Reaping Billions of Tax Dollars
By Nick Turse
The top Pentagon contractors, like death and taxes, almost never change. In 2002, the massive arms dealers Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman ranked one, two, and three among Department of Defense contractors, taking in $17 billion, $16.6 billion, and $8.7 billion. Lockheed, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman did it again in 2003 ($21.9, $17.3, and $11.1 billion); 2004 ($20.7, $17.1, and $11.9 billion); 2005 ($19.4, $18.3, and $13.5 billion); 2006 ($26.6, $20.3, and $16.6 billion); and, not surprisingly, 2007 as well ($27.8, $22.5, and $14.6 billion). Other regulars receiving mega-tax-funded payouts in a similarly clockwork-like manner include defense giants General Dynamics, Raytheon, the British weapons maker BAE Systems, and former Halliburton subsidiary KBR, as well as BP, Shell, and other power players from the military-petroleum complex.
With the basic Pentagon budget now clocking in at roughly $541 billion per year -- before "supplemental" war funding for Iraq, Afghanistan, and the President's Global War on Terror, as well as national security spending by other agencies, are factored in -- even Lockheed's hefty $28 billion take is a small percentage of the massive total. Obviously, significant sums of money are headed to other companies. However, most of them, including some of the largest, are all but unknown even to Pentagon-watchers and antiwar critics with a good grasp of the military industrial complex.
Last year, in a piece headlined "Washington's $8 Billion Shadow," Vanity Fair published an exposé of one of the better known large stealth contractors, SAIC (Science Applications International Corporation). SAIC, however, is just one of tens of thousands of Pentagon contractors. Many of these firms receive only tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars from the Pentagon every year. Some take home millions, tens of millions, or even hundreds of millions of dollars.
Then there's a select group that are masters of the universe in the ever-expanding military-corporate complex, regularly scoring more than a billion tax dollars a year from the Department of Defense. Unlike Lockheed, Boeing, and Northrop Grumman, however, most of these billion-dollar babies manage to fly beneath the radar of media (not to mention public) attention. If appearing at all, they generally do so innocuously in the business pages of newspapers. When it comes to their support for the Pentagon's wars and occupations in Afghanistan and Iraq, they are, in media terms, missing in action.
So, who are some of these mystery defense contractors you've probably never heard of? Here are snapshot portraits, culled largely from their own corporate documents, of five of the Pentagon's secret billion-dollar babies:
1. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings Inc.
Total DoD dollars in 2007: $3,360,739,032
This is billionaire investor Ronald Perelman's massive holding company. It has "interests in a diversified portfolio of public and private companies" that includes the cosmetics maker Revlon and Panavision (the folks who make the cameras that bring you TV shows like 24 and CSI). MacAndrews & Forbes might, at first blush, seem an unlikely defense contractor, but one of those privately owned companies it holds is AM General -- the folks who make the military Humvee. Today, says the company, nearly 200,000 Humvees have been "built and delivered to the U.S. Armed Forces and more than 50 friendly overseas nations." Humvees, however, are only part of the story.AM General has also assisted Carnegie Mellon University researchers in developing robots for the Pentagon blue-skies outfit, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency's "Grand Challenge," an autonomous robot-vehicle competition. Last year, AM General and General Dynamics Land Systems, a subsidiary of mega-weapons maker General Dynamics, formed a joint venture "to compete for the U.S. Army and Marine Corps Joint Light Tactical Vehicle (JLTV) program." AM General has even gone to war -- dispatching its "field service representatives" and "maintenance technical representatives" to Iraq where they were embedded with U.S. troops.
As such, it's hardly surprising that, earlier this year, the company received one of the Defense Logistics Agency's Outstanding Readiness Support Awards. Nor should anyone be surprised to discover that a top MacAndrews & Forbes corporate honcho, Executive Vice Chairman and Chief Administrative Officer Barry F. Schwartz, contributed a total of at least $10,000 to Straight Talk America, the political action committee of presidential candidate John McCain, who famously said it would be "fine" with him if U.S. troops occupied Iraq for "maybe a hundred years" (if not "a thousand" or "a million").
Perhaps hedging their bets just a bit, MacAndrews & Forbes is diversifying into an emerging complex-within-the-Complex: homeland security. Recently, AM General sold the Department of Homeland Security's Border Patrol "more than 100 HUMMER K-series trucks for use in border security operations."
2. DRS Technologies, Inc.
Total DoD dollars in 2007: $1,791,321,140
Incorporated during the Vietnam War, DRS Technologies has long been "a leading supplier of integrated products, services and support to military forces, intelligence agencies and prime contractors worldwide"; that is, they have been in the business of fielding products that enhance some of the DoD's deadliest weaponry, including "DDG-51 Aegis destroyers, M1A2 Abrams Main Battle Tanks, M2A3 Bradley Fighting Vehicles, OH-58D Kiowa Warrior helicopters, AH-64 Apache helicopters, F/A-18E/F Super Hornet and F-16 Fighting Falcon jet fighters, F-15 Eagle tactical fighters... [and] Ohio, Los Angeles and Virginia class submarines." They even have "contracts that support future military platforms, such as the DDG-1000 destroyer, CVN-78 next-generation aircraft carrier, Littoral Combat Ship and Future Combat System."
In addition to 2007's haul of Pentagon dollars, DRS Technologies has continued to clean up in 2008 for a range of projects, including: a $16.2 million Army contract for refrigeration units; $51 million in new orders from the Army for thermal weapon sights (part of a five-year, $2.3-billion deal inked in 2007); a $10.1 million contract to build more than 140 M989A1 Heavy Expanded Mobility Ammunition Trailers (to transport "numerous and extremely heavy Multiple Launch Rocket System pods, palletized or non-palletized conventional ammunition and fuel bladders"); and a $23 million deal "to provide engineering support, field service support and general depot repairs for the Mast Mounted Sights (MMS) on OH-58 Kiowa Warrior attack helicopters," among many other contracts.
Fitch Ratings, an international credit rating agency, recently made a smart, if perhaps understated, point -- one that actually fits all of these billion-dollar babies. DRS, it wrote, "has benefited from the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan..."
3. Harris Corporation
Total DoD dollars in 2007: $1,501,163,834
Harris is "an international communications and information technology company serving government, defense and commercial markets in more than 150 countries." It has an annual revenue of more than $4 billion and an impressive roster of former military personnel and other military-corporate complex insiders on its payroll. Not only does Harris assist and do business with a number of the Pentagon's largest contractors (like Lockheed Martin and BAE Systems), it is also an active participant in occupations abroad. On its website, the company boasts that "Harris technology has been used for a variety of commercial and defense applications, including the War in Iraq where the [Harris software] system provided detailed, 3-D representations of Baghdad and other key Iraqi cities."
Last year, Harris signed multiple deals with the military, including contracts to create a high-speed digital data link that transmits tactical video, radar, acoustic, and other sensor data from Navy MH-60R helicopters to their host ships. It also supplies the Navy with advanced computers that provide the "highly sophisticated moving maps and critical mission information via cockpit displays" used by flight crews.
In the first six months of this year, Harris has continued its hard work for the Complex. In January, the company was "selected by the U.S. Air Force for the Network and Space Operations and Maintenance (NSOM) program" for "a base contract and six options that bring the potential overall value to $410 million over six-and-a-half-years" to provide "operations and maintenance support to the 50th Space Wing's Air Force Satellite Control Network at locations around the world."
In May, the company was "awarded a three-year, $20 million contract by [top 10 Pentagon contractor] L3 Communications to provide products and services for a next-generation Tactical Video Capture System (TVCS)" -- a system that integrates real time video streams to enhance tactical training exercises -- "that will support training at various U.S. Marine Corps locations across the U.S. and abroad." That same month, Harris was also "awarded a potential five-year, $85 million Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract from the U.S. Navy for multiband satellite communications terminals that will provide advanced communications for aircraft carriers and other large deck ships."
In addition, Harris is now hard at work in the Homeland. Not only did the company pick up more than $3 million from the Department of Homeland Security last year, but national security expert Tim Shorrock, in a 2007 CorpWatch article, "Domestic Spying, Inc.," specifically noted that Harris and fellow intelligence industry contractors "stand to profit from th[e] unprecedented expansion of America's domestic intelligence system."
4. Navistar Defense
Total DoD dollars in 2007: $1,166,805,361
Still listed in Pentagon documents under its old name, International Military and Government, LLC, Navistar is the military subsidiary of Navistar International Corporation -- "a holding company whose individual units provide integrated and best-in-class transportation solutions." While the company has served the U.S. military since World War I, it's known, if at all, by the public for making some of the Mine Resistant Ambush Protected (MRAP) vehicles designed to thwart Iraqi roadside bombs. As of April 2008, the U.S. military had "ordered 5,214 total production MaxxPro MRAP vehicles" from Navistar and, that same month, the company was awarded "a contract valued at more than $261 million... for engineering upgrades to the armor used on International MaxxPro MRAP vehicles."
But Navistar makes more than MRAPs. Just last month, the company signed a "multi-year contract valued at nearly $1.3 billion" with the U.S. Army "to provide Medium Tactical Vehicles and spare parts to the Afghanistan National Police, Afghan National Army, and the Iraqi Ministry of Defense." This followed a 2005 multi-year Army contract, worth $430 million, "for more than 2,900 vehicles and spare parts."
Quite obviously, the company is significantly, profitably, and proudly involved in the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. As Tom Feifar, the Global Defense and Export general manager for Navistar Parts, put it late last year, "It's an honor to be a part of the effort to support our troops."
5. Evergreen International Airlines
Total DoD dollars in 2007: $1,105,610,723
A privately held global aviation services company, it has subsidiaries in related industries such as helicopter aviation (Evergreen Helicopters, Inc.), as well as a few unrelated efforts like producing "agricultural, nursery and wine products" (Evergreen Agricultural Enterprises, Inc.). Evergreen has been on the Pentagon's payroll for a long time. Back in 2004, Ed Connolly, the executive vice president of Evergreen International Airlines, stated, "Evergreen has flown continuously for the [U.S. Air Force] Air Mobility Command since 1975 and is proud to continue its long standing history of supporting the U.S. Armed Forces global missions with quality and reliable services."
Not surprisingly, Evergreen has been intimately involved in the occupation of Iraq. In fact, in 2004, the company received "approximately 200 awards for its support of international airlift services during the Iraq war" from the Air Force's Air Mobility Command. An Air Force general even handed out these medals and certificates of achievement to Evergreen's employees.
In Amnesty International's 2006 report, "Below the Radar: Secret Flights to Torture and 'Disappearance,'" the human rights organization noted that Evergreen was one of only a handful of private companies with current permits to land at U.S. military bases worldwide. That same year, the company even airlifted FOX News personality Bill O'Reilly and his TV show crew to Kuwait and Iraq to meet and greet troops, sign books and pictures, and hand out trinkets. And just last year the company was part of a consortium, including such high profile commercial carriers as American, Delta, and United Airlines that the Pentagon awarded a "$1,031,154,403 firm fixed-price contract for international airlift services... [that] is expected to be completed September 2008."
Under the Radar
All told, these five stealth corporations from the military-corporate complex received more than $8.9 billion in taxpayer dollars in 2007. To put this into perspective, that sum is almost $2 billion more than the Bush administration's proposed 2009 budget for the Environmental Protection Agency. Put another way, it's about nine times what one-sixth of the world's population spent on food last year.
Tens of thousands of defense contractors -- from well-known "civilian" corporations (like Coca-Cola, Kraft, and Dell) to tiny companies -- have fattened up on the Pentagon and its wars. Most of the time, large or small, they fly under the radar and are seldom identified as defense contractors at all. So it's hardly surprising that firms like Harris and Evergreen, without name recognition outside their own worlds, can take in billions in taxpayer dollars without notice or comment in our increasingly militarized civilian economy.
When the history of the Iraq War is finally written, chances are that these five billion-dollar babies, and most of the other defense contractors involved in making the U.S. occupation possible, will be left out. Until we begin coming to grips with the role of such corporations in creating the material basis for an imperial foreign policy, we'll never be able to grasp fully how the Pentagon works and why we so regularly make war in, and carry out occupations of, distant lands.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bryangalt on Jun 26, 2008 2:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then of course, there is the public. Yep, this huge mass of blind faith and ignorance is where the problem really begins and ends. For reasons that baffle me, a vast majority of the public seems to believe that the government would never do anything to seriously against the overall good of America and if that were to happen, the media would be on it.
HA HA HA HA...
Well, the media has been shown to be complicit in their roles of helping to spread the Bush administrations propoganda by letting DOD spokesman spout out lie after lie on their networks without ever condemning the DOD for it.
As I see it, their are only a few ways this gravy train will come to an end:
1. The corporations get a soul and repent (about the same time hell freezes over).
2. Our nation goes into an economic depression (this has the highest probability)
3. Jesus returns (the Muslims will be pissed)
4. We, the public assholes who keep paying our taxes to support these moronic policies, are finally so bled out that we must resort to an uprising, potentially a full-blown war to overthrow the government. Something like this could be triggered by the government's continued penetration into everyone's business. Eventually, its going to backlash.
5. and finally, the Congress simultaneously grows a spine and a set of balls and puts their foot up the asses of the DOD operations managers to stop this nonsense. #3 has a higher probability of occuring however.
We have allowed our country to be taken over by robber barons in the name of our security, and we are less secure now than ever before. We have allowed ourselves to become a disgrace as a citizenry. Eisenhower clearly stated that an "alert and involved" citenzry would be the only defense against the "complex" taking us over. I guess we couldn't drop the bongs and the game controllers long enough to notice what the hell is really going down...too bad for us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: chiefwanadubie
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: annavan1
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: mr. joshua
» Solution? Guns and small independent farms
Posted by: Leadlip
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carolcarre on Jun 26, 2008 3:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Eisenhower's actual speech
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: ven Eisenhower said...
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: ven Eisenhower said...
Posted by: pomes
» RE: ven Eisenhower said...
Posted by: CosmoViking
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jun 26, 2008 5:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: John Seavers
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: John Seavers
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: luzmejor on Jun 26, 2008 5:11 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is that we didn't want to believe the "free" nation's leaders could actually fall for that hoary old line, especially from someone who could barely string a few sentences together in public.
Now that it is too hard to bear, nobody is even listening to our recycled Feuhrer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on Jun 26, 2008 5:37 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What a surprise
Posted by: Lauren
» We Would Be Better Off
Posted by: rjgwood
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 26, 2008 5:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At what point do we the people bring enough pressure to bear on Congress that funds the Pentagon for some accountability?
At what point are we the people going to realize that using the weapons systems that we have we are in a position to decimate the planet? That means no one will be alive to tell the tale!!
At what point can we say enough already!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: HoboHomo
» What? No response?
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: HillbillyBob
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss? Yes.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: williameon on Jun 26, 2008 6:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Privatize and steal everything
Where did all the money go?
Flush it down the toilet.
It's
A
Bush/Chainey
Halliburton/Carlye
Stinking
WAR
There is no military
Just our Militia
Being set up and
Knocked down
for
GREED!
Keep the casualties high to justify more stealing.
Da?
Get in your Hum-V and go play sitting DUCK!
Round and round you'll go in the Iraqi shooting gallery!
Who'll get shot?
The poor Amei-con.
McPain the Hanoi candidate says things are safe
Surrounded by The Dark Army and wearing a bullet proof vest.
Escorted, handled and prodded by Resident Lieberwhore.
McPain
The (WAR)
PIMP!
Has some WMD's to sell you.
Exxon's dream and a
Grunts nightmare.
Oil $200+ a Barrel!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: antiapathy on Jun 26, 2008 6:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God Bless America!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Make Love Not Bombs
Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Make Love Not Bombs
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» FYI: There is NO shortage of Darwin Awards: Please collect Yours ASAP!
Posted by: madmax427
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: antiapathy
» necessary evil? no such thing, no such need
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: necessary evil? no such thing, no such need
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: necessary evil? no such thing, no such need
Posted by: pomes
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blueapples26 on Jun 26, 2008 7:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're right but ...
Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: You're right but ...
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: You're right but ...
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: You're right but ...
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: You're right but ...
Posted by: E.H.W.
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Valid Points
Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Valid Points
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Valid Points
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: HillbillyBob
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rockpicker on Jun 26, 2008 9:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A just God expects individual loyalty to one's conscience, and a responsible exercise of the 'gift' of free will.
Come judgement day, my guess is, your decision to refuse to pay taxes will count in your eternal favor.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Funding an illegal and immoral regime
Posted by: Lauren
» Lauren: Check this out
Posted by: rockpicker
» It is "intent" that concerns God the most, I think
Posted by: form5166
Comments are closed-
Posted by: inspired1 on Jun 26, 2008 9:33 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Money, gone into the "black hole" as you say.
But there are at least two stories here.
The REAL story are the US Representatives in Congress and our Senators who have gone into their own Black Hole when it comes to representing and protecting the people of America from these cannibals who themselves claim to be "protecting" America.
What senator or representative has brought this up in any serious fashion in Congress?
Which candidate for president has made a vow to look into this runaway madness which keeps Americans BROKE, SICK, and infinitely LESS SECURE? This whole Primary/General Election Process barely passes beyond a TV game show to distract the masses of once-citizens-now-consumers while the Real Deal[ing] goes on in obscure back rooms and back channels. OUR money, OUR currency, in the toilet to pay for technology fiefdoms and pasha lifestyles for...thugs, bullies and reprehensible low-life dregs of humanity sporting MBA's and Armani.
Your reporting on this is more than a breath of fresh air. But to discuss this without a parallel loud, harsh critical analysis of our failed political system that says NOTHING of this reality to the people, leaves us begging for a nexus and some notion of a way out.
All the hoopla about Obama, McCain (and recently Clinton), the calls for more debates, etc. that never come close to addressing more than the window dressing allowed us plebeians, makes one wonder where the complicity with, and enabling of, the New American Wehrmacht ends for our media, including the so-called "alternative" press.
As far as I can see, the only member of Congress to have ever attempted to look behind the blue curtain and tell the public what she saw was former Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney who was roundly attacked and driven from office by her own party, yet who today is running for Green Party as a presidential candidate (to be determined in July).
We may not like the choices made for us by the unseen players in this this cosmetic democracy, but if alternative media are to make a deal out of revealing some of this underhanded behavior, as you have done here, you also ought to be loudly quoting the likes of McKinney and Nader who ARE (against all odds) running for the presidency and who, unlike the others, actually have some relevant things to say to the American People.
As alternative media, you can't have it both ways. When there are spokespeople for what is right and decent in our nation, you should be giving them all the space you can, supplying the soapbox and megaphone if needs be. Polls be damned. It is only the Truth that counts here.
When democracy is failing us, alternative media must not fail democracy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar - Cynthia McKinney
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar - Cynthia McKinney
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar - Cynthia McKinney
Posted by: inspired1
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar - Cynthia McKinney
Posted by: willd4change
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: willd4change
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: inspired1
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: inspired1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mistery509 on Jun 26, 2008 10:09 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We want the same cronies in government. People do not want change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Do we want change
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Do we want change
Posted by: inspired1
» Polls consistently show that Americans want reduced military spending and increased social spending
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Polls consistently show that Americans want reduced military spending and increased social spend
Posted by: pomes
» RE: Do we want change
Posted by: pomes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 26, 2008 11:24 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
more Winslow Wheeler articles
The Pentagon Money blog
I think that this is an issue upon which progressives and "conservatives" can find common ground... wasteful spending in the Department of Defense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Some good sources to keep up on wasteful military spending
Posted by: CosmoViking
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willd4change on Jun 26, 2008 11:39 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blueapples26 on Jun 26, 2008 12:41 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will not pay anymore wage slave taxes to the military industrial congressional complex. Let the cystem suck dry and it will die.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Absolutely beautiful!
Posted by: rockpicker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rockpicker on Jun 26, 2008 7:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Multiple airborne commands were up echoing this message and radio traffic became hot and heavy and all pointing to something very tense going on in the Atlantic region," according to an article that was posted on www.stevequayle.com Monday.
Titled "At The Brink Of Nuclear War--U.S. vs. Russia," apparently Putin was not kidding when he told the U.S. and England to leave Iran alone.
I called Quayle, a radio talk-show host in Bozeman, Montana, this morning. He confirmed seeing a missile launched to the east of Bozeman at about 9:30 Friday night. Another witness saw the missile from a backyard in Bozeman. Quayle is scheduled to interview this witness Monday.
All witnesses concur that another vehicle was involved, and that the missile appeared to have been destroyed as the second vehicle closed on it.
As for civil defense, we are totally unprepared. They plan to let us all fry.
Author did the show today at 5:00 pm, Mountain. Shows are archived. Check it out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CosmoViking on Jun 27, 2008 5:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their sole motivation is defence (war) and protecting the position of the richest Americans (like world class criminal and asshole, David Rockefeller) and it has been since the National Security Act was signed in 1947.
There are far more places on the boards of these corporations than there are people, so they put prople from "friendly" companies on those boards and PRESTO you have an illegal, secret industry that should make evcery American feel really bad about where the country has ended up:
Pure Corporatism.
Dick Cheney, you suck in ways only the most deplorable few, like Mussolini, would understand. If I were you, I would never again walk on foreign soil.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The right direction.
Posted by: inspired1
» RE: The right direction.
Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: The right direction.
Posted by: pomes
» RE: The right direction.
Posted by: CosmoViking
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MisterWu on Jun 27, 2008 12:25 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ed Herring
Posted by: CosmoViking
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MisterWu on Jun 27, 2008 12:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Israel on Jun 29, 2008 9:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a look at the God-Father of the Anti-Military Industrial Complex, Gen Smedley Butler. He was the biggest hero of WW1 that you never heard of. He earned TWO Congressional Medals of Honor. There are a couple of reasons you have not heard of Gen Butler. One his book, "War is a Racket" here: http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm
in which he exposes the lucrative nexus of Wall St and War.The other reason is that he blew the whistle on those plotting a Coup against our own government under FDR, including Prescott Bush, W's grand dad, EI DuPont, FW Woolworth and other corporate, fascist stars! Check it out, Smedley's testimony before Congress is still available.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Jun 29, 2008 9:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently went back into the employment of the "military industrial complex" for a contractor because none of the purely civilian employers around here would hire me at a decent wage.
A man has to eat. When you're looking at homelessness and starvation your morals quickly evaporate and a certain pragmatism takes over.
3 cheers for the military industrial complex that literally saved my life. The bigger picture doesn't matter when you're just trying to survive.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: bryangalt on Jun 26, 2008 2:02 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Then of course, there is the public. Yep, this huge mass of blind faith and ignorance is where the problem really begins and ends. For reasons that baffle me, a vast majority of the public seems to believe that the government would never do anything to seriously against the overall good of America and if that were to happen, the media would be on it.
HA HA HA HA...
Well, the media has been shown to be complicit in their roles of helping to spread the Bush administrations propoganda by letting DOD spokesman spout out lie after lie on their networks without ever condemning the DOD for it.
As I see it, their are only a few ways this gravy train will come to an end:
1. The corporations get a soul and repent (about the same time hell freezes over).
2. Our nation goes into an economic depression (this has the highest probability)
3. Jesus returns (the Muslims will be pissed)
4. We, the public assholes who keep paying our taxes to support these moronic policies, are finally so bled out that we must resort to an uprising, potentially a full-blown war to overthrow the government. Something like this could be triggered by the government's continued penetration into everyone's business. Eventually, its going to backlash.
5. and finally, the Congress simultaneously grows a spine and a set of balls and puts their foot up the asses of the DOD operations managers to stop this nonsense. #3 has a higher probability of occuring however.
We have allowed our country to be taken over by robber barons in the name of our security, and we are less secure now than ever before. We have allowed ourselves to become a disgrace as a citizenry. Eisenhower clearly stated that an "alert and involved" citenzry would be the only defense against the "complex" taking us over. I guess we couldn't drop the bongs and the game controllers long enough to notice what the hell is really going down...too bad for us.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: chiefwanadubie
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: annavan1
» RE: The Corporate Vampires
Posted by: mr. joshua
» Solution? Guns and small independent farms
Posted by: Leadlip
Comments are closed-
Posted by: carolcarre on Jun 26, 2008 3:44 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Eisenhower's actual speech
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: ven Eisenhower said...
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: ven Eisenhower said...
Posted by: pomes
» RE: ven Eisenhower said...
Posted by: CosmoViking
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GreyFoxThree on Jun 26, 2008 5:05 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JT
Ultimate Anonymity
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: John Seavers
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: John Seavers
Posted by: Dboy
Comments are closed-
Posted by: luzmejor on Jun 26, 2008 5:11 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The problem is that we didn't want to believe the "free" nation's leaders could actually fall for that hoary old line, especially from someone who could barely string a few sentences together in public.
Now that it is too hard to bear, nobody is even listening to our recycled Feuhrer.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: solrev on Jun 26, 2008 5:37 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: What a surprise
Posted by: Lauren
» We Would Be Better Off
Posted by: rjgwood
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Spiritgirl on Jun 26, 2008 5:56 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At what point do we the people bring enough pressure to bear on Congress that funds the Pentagon for some accountability?
At what point are we the people going to realize that using the weapons systems that we have we are in a position to decimate the planet? That means no one will be alive to tell the tale!!
At what point can we say enough already!!!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: HoboHomo
» What? No response?
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss
Posted by: HillbillyBob
» RE: Can we stop the blood loss? Yes.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: williameon on Jun 26, 2008 6:13 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Privatize and steal everything
Where did all the money go?
Flush it down the toilet.
It's
A
Bush/Chainey
Halliburton/Carlye
Stinking
WAR
There is no military
Just our Militia
Being set up and
Knocked down
for
GREED!
Keep the casualties high to justify more stealing.
Da?
Get in your Hum-V and go play sitting DUCK!
Round and round you'll go in the Iraqi shooting gallery!
Who'll get shot?
The poor Amei-con.
McPain the Hanoi candidate says things are safe
Surrounded by The Dark Army and wearing a bullet proof vest.
Escorted, handled and prodded by Resident Lieberwhore.
McPain
The (WAR)
PIMP!
Has some WMD's to sell you.
Exxon's dream and a
Grunts nightmare.
Oil $200+ a Barrel!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: antiapathy on Jun 26, 2008 6:31 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
God Bless America!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Make Love Not Bombs
Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Make Love Not Bombs
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» FYI: There is NO shortage of Darwin Awards: Please collect Yours ASAP!
Posted by: madmax427
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: antiapathy
» necessary evil? no such thing, no such need
Posted by: KaptainSpiffy
» RE: necessary evil? no such thing, no such need
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: necessary evil? no such thing, no such need
Posted by: pomes
» RE: I'm a war profiteer.
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blueapples26 on Jun 26, 2008 7:22 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» You're right but ...
Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: You're right but ...
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: You're right but ...
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: You're right but ...
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: You're right but ...
Posted by: E.H.W.
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» Valid Points
Posted by: tommy_slothrop
» RE: Valid Points
Posted by: Knot_Rich
» RE: Valid Points
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: we have choice
Posted by: HillbillyBob
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rockpicker on Jun 26, 2008 9:32 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A just God expects individual loyalty to one's conscience, and a responsible exercise of the 'gift' of free will.
Come judgement day, my guess is, your decision to refuse to pay taxes will count in your eternal favor.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Funding an illegal and immoral regime
Posted by: Lauren
» Lauren: Check this out
Posted by: rockpicker
» It is "intent" that concerns God the most, I think
Posted by: form5166
Comments are closed-
Posted by: inspired1 on Jun 26, 2008 9:33 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Money, gone into the "black hole" as you say.
But there are at least two stories here.
The REAL story are the US Representatives in Congress and our Senators who have gone into their own Black Hole when it comes to representing and protecting the people of America from these cannibals who themselves claim to be "protecting" America.
What senator or representative has brought this up in any serious fashion in Congress?
Which candidate for president has made a vow to look into this runaway madness which keeps Americans BROKE, SICK, and infinitely LESS SECURE? This whole Primary/General Election Process barely passes beyond a TV game show to distract the masses of once-citizens-now-consumers while the Real Deal[ing] goes on in obscure back rooms and back channels. OUR money, OUR currency, in the toilet to pay for technology fiefdoms and pasha lifestyles for...thugs, bullies and reprehensible low-life dregs of humanity sporting MBA's and Armani.
Your reporting on this is more than a breath of fresh air. But to discuss this without a parallel loud, harsh critical analysis of our failed political system that says NOTHING of this reality to the people, leaves us begging for a nexus and some notion of a way out.
All the hoopla about Obama, McCain (and recently Clinton), the calls for more debates, etc. that never come close to addressing more than the window dressing allowed us plebeians, makes one wonder where the complicity with, and enabling of, the New American Wehrmacht ends for our media, including the so-called "alternative" press.
As far as I can see, the only member of Congress to have ever attempted to look behind the blue curtain and tell the public what she saw was former Georgia congresswoman Cynthia McKinney who was roundly attacked and driven from office by her own party, yet who today is running for Green Party as a presidential candidate (to be determined in July).
We may not like the choices made for us by the unseen players in this this cosmetic democracy, but if alternative media are to make a deal out of revealing some of this underhanded behavior, as you have done here, you also ought to be loudly quoting the likes of McKinney and Nader who ARE (against all odds) running for the presidency and who, unlike the others, actually have some relevant things to say to the American People.
As alternative media, you can't have it both ways. When there are spokespeople for what is right and decent in our nation, you should be giving them all the space you can, supplying the soapbox and megaphone if needs be. Polls be damned. It is only the Truth that counts here.
When democracy is failing us, alternative media must not fail democracy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar - Cynthia McKinney
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar - Cynthia McKinney
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar - Cynthia McKinney
Posted by: inspired1
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar - Cynthia McKinney
Posted by: willd4change
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: willd4change
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: Quannah
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: inspired1
» RE: Democracy Under the Radar
Posted by: inspired1
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mistery509 on Jun 26, 2008 10:09 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We want the same cronies in government. People do not want change.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Do we want change
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Do we want change
Posted by: inspired1
» Polls consistently show that Americans want reduced military spending and increased social spending
Posted by: fanny666
» RE: Polls consistently show that Americans want reduced military spending and increased social spend
Posted by: pomes
» RE: Do we want change
Posted by: pomes
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 26, 2008 11:24 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
more Winslow Wheeler articles
The Pentagon Money blog
I think that this is an issue upon which progressives and "conservatives" can find common ground... wasteful spending in the Department of Defense.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Some good sources to keep up on wasteful military spending
Posted by: CosmoViking
Comments are closed-
Posted by: willd4change on Jun 26, 2008 11:39 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blueapples26 on Jun 26, 2008 12:41 PM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will not pay anymore wage slave taxes to the military industrial congressional complex. Let the cystem suck dry and it will die.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Absolutely beautiful!
Posted by: rockpicker
Comments are closed-
Posted by: rockpicker on Jun 26, 2008 7:33 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Multiple airborne commands were up echoing this message and radio traffic became hot and heavy and all pointing to something very tense going on in the Atlantic region," according to an article that was posted on www.stevequayle.com Monday.
Titled "At The Brink Of Nuclear War--U.S. vs. Russia," apparently Putin was not kidding when he told the U.S. and England to leave Iran alone.
I called Quayle, a radio talk-show host in Bozeman, Montana, this morning. He confirmed seeing a missile launched to the east of Bozeman at about 9:30 Friday night. Another witness saw the missile from a backyard in Bozeman. Quayle is scheduled to interview this witness Monday.
All witnesses concur that another vehicle was involved, and that the missile appeared to have been destroyed as the second vehicle closed on it.
As for civil defense, we are totally unprepared. They plan to let us all fry.
Author did the show today at 5:00 pm, Mountain. Shows are archived. Check it out.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: CosmoViking on Jun 27, 2008 5:04 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Their sole motivation is defence (war) and protecting the position of the richest Americans (like world class criminal and asshole, David Rockefeller) and it has been since the National Security Act was signed in 1947.
There are far more places on the boards of these corporations than there are people, so they put prople from "friendly" companies on those boards and PRESTO you have an illegal, secret industry that should make evcery American feel really bad about where the country has ended up:
Pure Corporatism.
Dick Cheney, you suck in ways only the most deplorable few, like Mussolini, would understand. If I were you, I would never again walk on foreign soil.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The right direction.
Posted by: inspired1
» RE: The right direction.
Posted by: CosmoViking
» RE: The right direction.
Posted by: pomes
» RE: The right direction.
Posted by: CosmoViking
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MisterWu on Jun 27, 2008 12:25 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: ed Herring
Posted by: CosmoViking
Comments are closed-
Posted by: MisterWu on Jun 27, 2008 12:27 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Israel on Jun 29, 2008 9:13 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Take a look at the God-Father of the Anti-Military Industrial Complex, Gen Smedley Butler. He was the biggest hero of WW1 that you never heard of. He earned TWO Congressional Medals of Honor. There are a couple of reasons you have not heard of Gen Butler. One his book, "War is a Racket" here: http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm
in which he exposes the lucrative nexus of Wall St and War.The other reason is that he blew the whistle on those plotting a Coup against our own government under FDR, including Prescott Bush, W's grand dad, EI DuPont, FW Woolworth and other corporate, fascist stars! Check it out, Smedley's testimony before Congress is still available.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: blogbooks on Jun 29, 2008 9:58 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I recently went back into the employment of the "military industrial complex" for a contractor because none of the purely civilian employers around here would hire me at a decent wage.
A man has to eat. When you're looking at homelessness and starvation your morals quickly evaporate and a certain pragmatism takes over.
3 cheers for the military industrial complex that literally saved my life. The bigger picture doesn't matter when you're just trying to survive.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Erick Erickson Is the New CNN Go-to Bigot, Misogynist and Homophobe
Religious Right and Tea Party Nation Turn to Michele Bachmann in Desperate Attempt to Defeat Health-Care Bill
Honoring Granny D: Crusader for Democracy





