Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

The Key to Driving Energy Prices Down

By Marie Cocco, Washington Post Writers Group. Posted June 24, 2008.


In the absence of a reliable Congress, we need to make personal sacrifices. Turn down the thermostat. Ditch the SUV.
Advertisement

WASHINGTON -- Two cheers for the Saudis. Not so much for agreeing to boost oil production a bit -- a move that in the short term seems unlikely to ease summer gas prices. But because there's nothing like the Saudi version of straight talk to put in perspective the tongue-twisting of American politicians.

At the global confab of energy producing and consuming countries held in Jiddah over the weekend, Saudi Arabia -- the sole oil-producing nation capable of quick production increases -- said it would boost output in an effort to ease a global oil-price crisis. The sheiks gave a lesson in economics, insisting they will try to meet demand in their usual self-interested way: by boosting output just enough to quell a crisis, but not by so much that Saudi Arabia's own profits from high demand and correspondingly high prices are diminished.

This placing of Saudi cards face up on the table tends to infuriate American politicians and consumers. And that's a good thing.

For whenever spikes in energy prices lead to the inevitable upsurge in public demands that somebody do something, American politicians resort to nothing so much as self-defeating silliness. That is behind the call, embraced by Republican John McCain and, before her bid for the Democratic nomination ended, Hillary Clinton, for a summer gas-tax "holiday." Implementing this would cause people to drive more at the very time when high prices are prompting them to drive somewhat less -- that is, it would have precisely the opposite effect from what is really needed.

Democrat Barack Obama correctly opposes the gas-tax holiday as a blatant political pander. But what of his newest energy proposal? He seeks a crackdown on oil-market speculation, which might or might not be one of the causes of the current price surge.

I'm all for getting tough on nefarious traders who seek to profit from making other people's lives miserable. But be honest: Did the unraveling of Enron and the ultimate prosecution of those well-known wrongdoers spare us from the current energy price crunch?

At bottom, high energy prices are driven by high demand, and currently that demand is being driven by the rapidly developing economies in China, India and elsewhere. Politicians in the U.S. have historically feared telling Americans -- still the world's biggest consumers of oil -- that they need to use less of it. This is why McCain has now promoted offshore drilling, a proposal that would probably take a decade or more, give or take a few lawsuits and state political upheavals, to produce a drop of oil. It's one reason why Obama is so devoted to ethanol subsidies, a supposedly virtuous way to replace oil with a biofuel -- even though the diversion of corn crops to fuel production already is contributing to rising food prices.

As usual when it comes to energy politics, we have failed to meet the enemy and conclude that it is us. Remember how Jimmy Carter was ridiculed and reviled for putting on a sweater and telling us to lower our thermostats? Well, what if we had done so three decades ago rather than a few months ago?

And what if we'd never had a love affair with SUVs? What are now symbols of energy profligacy were, only a couple of years ago, the ultimate suburban status symbols. All manner of rationalizations were cooked up to justify their purchase: The need to drive kids to soccer practice -- a trip that requires extra room for little but a ball and a water bottle -- was one of my personal favorites. In truth, you can't pass a suburban office park without noticing that their lots are packed from end to end with these behemoths, which are driven far more often for commuting trips than for camping excursions.

Those looking forward to a change of presidents to usher in a serious change in energy policy should consider this: It took Congress more than three decades to increase vehicle fuel-efficiency standards and eliminate a loophole through which SUVs had boldly driven. The inertia prevailed regardless of whether Democrats or Republicans were in charge of Capitol Hill and the White House.

Alternative fuels are indeed needed and so is government policy to promote them. But there is no miracle cure that can cut energy prices in the short or long term other than that rarest of commodities, a political and personal commitment to sacrifice.

(c) 2008, Washington Post Writers Group

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: gasoline, saudi arabia, energy crisis

Marie Cocco is a prize-winning syndicated columnist on political and cultural topics for The Washington Post Writers Group. She is a frequent commentator on national TV and radio shows.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Vertical Farming
Posted by: benzene on Jun 24, 2008 1:48 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Google it!
Repopulate dead urban centers and make them fruitful! If train tracks are rebuilt, then there would no longer be so much need for automobiles or the highway maintenance that they demand.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Build them and I will come...
Posted by: ahmlco on Jun 24, 2008 1:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I own a 2001 Jeep Cherokee, and have been looking at alternatives but have yet to pull the trigger. Diesel TDIs like the VW Jetta are options, as are the Prius and Civic hybrids.... but they're all so BORING. Why does every super-efficient engine have to be contained in a sedan-shaped straightjacket?

Besides, new TDIs won't be available until November and dealers are taking $1,000 a pop to put your name on a list. The Prius is supposed to be overhauled for '09, but won't become a PHEV until 2010 at the earliest. Same timeframe applies for GM's Volt.

And I'm also not convinced that it makes economic sense to buy a lesser vehicle that does maybe 30MPG highway and 24 or so city, as I'll end up being stuck in a new 60 month loan agreement. Let gas prices continue to rise five years out, and I'll effectively be right back where I started. Used vehicles aren't really options either, as everything halfway efficient has already been snapped up.

Bottom line? I WANT to buy, but I'm probably going to stay in the Jeep another year or so until the automakers get their new technologies out the door.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Build them and I will come... Posted by: mr. joshua
» One word for you.... Posted by: mr. joshua
» RE: Build them and I will come... Posted by: mr. joshua
Never have owned an SUV
Posted by: EJW on Jun 24, 2008 2:06 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've never owned a gas guzzler (I did learn to drive in my Daddy's old Chevy Impala). My cars have all gotten about 30 mpg but no better than that in the last thirty years. Surely our 'great and glorious' industry giants could do better than this. I've been using CFL bulbs in every application that I could for at least ten years. I don't have a green lawn that I have to water, I have dirt and dust (and my neighbor's disgust). So what else am I supposed to sacrifice? Doing laundry - have new front load models that don't use much water. I'd like a grey water system - but they are illegal and expensive. I'd love solar - but again out of my price range and the battery technology still has a way to go. I just bought a new car - the hybrids couldn't meet the fuel savings of a regular car for my uses.

I'm will and always have been, but I can't do it all. I want the government and big business to do it's share. The military has no standard whatsoever to meet, either environmental or economic. Business only cares about the next quarter's numbers. Please tell them to sacrifice - not the people who are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Wanna save the world?...
Posted by: HistArch on Jun 24, 2008 3:15 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...don't buy stuff. Live within your means and use up what you've already got.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Maybe the author should consider shutting up and voting for 3rd party progressive/liberals instead.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 24, 2008 4:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of course if you vote for either the GOP or Dem you'll be DEFRAUDED ! Ralph Nader is pushing for all the better ideas but he's not being given a chance even by the supposedly "liberal" crowd or for that matter the rank-and-files.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

End the Speculation
Posted by: MyLeftFoot on Jun 24, 2008 7:24 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by the banks who are creating the next bubble in oil and commodities. they are trying to save their butts from the mortgage fallout by driving prices higher. has nothing to do with supply and demand, the prices are out of whack with the fundamentals. read it here:
http://www.counterpunch.com/whitney06242008.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do What You Can Afford..........
Posted by: gellero1 on Jun 24, 2008 7:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And if it's a personal jet, more power to ya..........

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Environmentalists wanted it and now we got it.
Posted by: Ky Lake Dave on Jun 25, 2008 7:34 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For three decades the Environmentalists of the Democratic party have blocked building of Refineries or Nuclear Power Plants. They have blocked drilling off shore and drilling in ANWR. They have blocked Windmills off shore. They have blocked any and all sources of energy in the name of saving the planet. Now with supplies down and demand around the world rising, the cost of energy is skyrocketing. Accompanying those skyrocketing prices are the rising costs of food and goods. Transporting of goods and of food and production of food and goods use a great deal of energy the Democrats have blocked us from.
Now here it comes. America as a whole are going to DEMAND DRILLING in ANWR and off shore. Americans will DEMAND the building of Nuclear Power Plants they will DEMAND more Coal mining, they will demand more refineries built. The Democrats and progressives using the environment to starve energy from us, have hurt people. The poor and middle class are feeling the pinch. The Lear Jet Liberals like Al Gore and John Kerry can afford the massive increases in energy costs the poor and middle class can not.
The poor and middle class will not be fooled again by the rantings of the far left progressives that blocked so many of them from affordable power that they need. Many progressives feel it is healthy for America to feel this pain and to force them to conserve energy. I think those progressives are about to feel a huge backlash against them and their way of thinking. The scale may tilt too far and many of the positive things environmentalists have accomplished could be washed away in the tsunami of disenchantment coming their way.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Bigger the SUV, the Smaller the Penis
Posted by: Libertine on Jun 25, 2008 9:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I can't stand SUVs, and those who drive them are usually self-absorbed jerks who are obnoxious drivers who think they own the road. In other words, the classic moron with inadequacy issues.

I live in the Deep South, where SUVs now greatly outnumber the traditional pickup truck. While driving around, I've taken informal surveys of what's on the road by counting a set number of vehicles that I encounter and it comes out that an average of 7 out of 10 vehicles I encounter are SUVs and large pickups.

And instead of wanting muscle/sports cars as most guys wanted when I was in my late teens and early 20s, the guys in this age bracket now all seem to want SUVs.

As for myself, I've never even owned a four-door car, let alone an SUV. Every time I pull up to the gas pumps in my little Eclipse, I laugh at SUV drivers who probably spend more on one fill up for their behemoths than I spend on food in a month.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That's right . . .
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 26, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the price of bread hits six bucks a loaf and milk is twenty dollars a quart, give that SUV or Texas-sized pickup a loving pat. Drive the damned thing a ninety, too.

And sure to add a bumper sticker damning the oil companies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huh??
Posted by: gellero1 on Jun 26, 2008 9:06 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"High energy prices are driven by high demand"................this author is in the ozone. The demand for petroleum has not doubled over the past 3 months. I don't think she has thought this out very well.

Perhaps this need for more dollars by the petroleum exporters has more to do with the inflation of the currency ( that is, the $dollar$ ) by a government ( Democrat and Republican ) that seeks to keep everyone ( individual and corporate ) on the dole and keeps the presses rolling.

Our government cooks the books on inflation ( aka 'the cost of living ) by redefining what it measures. The REAL rate of current inflation is about 11%.

And Mr. Obama ( and Mr. McCain too ) will not change anything......get over it.

Ron Paul was the only one who said we should return to Constitutional money. Most people have never read the definition of Constitutional money.

Fools, All

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Market Manipulation Oil Futures
Posted by: Bobzmcishl on Jun 30, 2008 5:00 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When only a few people control the price of oil, the price will go up. Oil supply and demand imbalances are not the reason for the surge in price of oil. Just look at the day that oil prices spiked $ 10.00. Did everyone in the world that day decide to take a car trip? Oil speculation is obviously part of the problem. Look at what happened with California and power prices controlled by Enron. Congress needs to get "all the liars in the room" and get to the bottom of this manipulation issue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]