Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
100 words for 100 days: submit your 100 word essay and get published on AlterNet
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Party Crashing: How the Facebook Generation Does Politics

By Courtney E. Martin, AlterNet. Posted June 26, 2008.


Author Keli Goff on how today's youth -- black youth in particular -- choose their leaders. Hint: It's not by skin color or party affiliation.
Advertisement

As John McCain begins to strategize how he might wrangle some of the youth vote from Barack Obama, and Obama -- for his part -- tries to hold on to his solid base of Americans under 30, we thought it would be interesting to talk with author and frequent television commentator Keli Goff.

Goff, just 28 years old herself, has written a book called Party Crashing that lays out just how competitive these candidates are going to have be if they want to win over the youth -- black youth in particular. Gone are the days, she argues, when Civil Rights-era leaders were card-carrying Democrats, come hell or high water; instead, the hip hop generation is more likely to be suspicious of all party politics and spin, choosing their favorite leader based on individual characteristics, not party affiliation.

Goff writes, "Not only has the post-civil rights generation grown up in an America in which segregation is a distant memory, but I have grown up in an America in which black people and black culture are the defining arbiters of America's cultural landscape." It seems clear that young black Americans feel their own power and refuse to be neglected by a Democratic party that, at times, has taken their loyalties for granted. And in the face of that, the GOP just might have something to gain from all these independently minded sons and daughters.

Courtney E. Martin: In Party Crashing you argue that the hip hop generation is less likely to affiliate with a party than their parents'. How do you see that affecting their perceptions of McCain and Obama?

Keli Goff: Yes, as you mentioned, my research found that 35 percent of young black voters ages 18-24 are registered Independents. I think that the burgeoning independent streak among young black voters is one of the untold stories of Barack Obama's success this election. It's been a bit easy for some to jump to the conclusion that "Barack Obama is a black candidate, so of course young, black voters are supporting him." Or "Barack Obama is a Democrat, so of course young, blacks would support him. They're Democrats," but the truth is much more complex than that.

During interviews for my book, I found that the reasons that young black voters found Obama's candidacy appealing were for many of the same reasons some young white voters do, namely a perception that he puts policy ahead of partisanship. This perception of not just politics as usual came up with voters across the board -- including self-described conservatives and liberals. McCain didn't come up as much, but my instinct is that, were he not running against Barack Obama (who for a variety of reasons, including the aforementioned, is extremely popular among younger black voters), John McCain might also benefit among this demographic for his longstanding image as a "maverick" who is willing to work across the party aisle. Although it's likely that, with every passing day of this primary, that image will increasingly become a distant memory.

What do you think some young people find so abhorrent about the party system?

I don't know that younger voters necessarily find the party system "abhorrent," per se, but I do think that there is a weariness of partisan rhetoric. Many voters under the age of 30 grew up in an incredibly divisive partisan atmosphere that included moments like the impeachment, etc., but the reasons for independence among the voters I interviewed really varied. Some simply consider themselves independent thinkers and, therefore, see no reason to hitch their wagon to a particular form of group thought, such as a specific political party. Others simply said that they have a variety of perspectives on different issues; therefore, no individual political party could adequately represent them on every single issue. Others -- and this was perhaps the most common refrain -- simply said they believe in voting for a specific person, NOT a specific party. Perhaps one of the most interesting anecdotes on this is that I interviewed Erika Harold, the 2003 Miss America famous for her conservative stances on issues such as abstinence-only education. Though she is adamantly pro-life, she confessed that she voted for Barack Obama over pro-life activist Alan Keyes for the Senate -- the same year she actually appeared at the Republican National Convention. Her reasoning was that there are many issues that matter, such as education and national security, and you have to be willing to vote for the most qualified candidate, regardless of labels, accordingly.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: politics, feminism, civil rights, youth vote, political parties, keli goff, party crashing, youth voters, party affiliation

Courtney E. Martin is the author of Perfect Girls, Starving Daughters: The Frightening New Normalcy of Hating Your Body. You can read more about her work at www.courtneyemartin.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Poor Obama-ites
Posted by: democracynowiniraq on Jun 26, 2008 12:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Messiah Barack Obama will be more like Bush than even he HIMSELF believes.

Shoot, maybe I can't pull the troops out of Iraq in 18 months. Uh-oh, maybe I CAN'T talk unconditionally with Iran. Darn-maybe I CAN'T create a national health insurance program and get away with it (political or otherwise). Hey maybe this NAFTA thing ain't so bad after all, etc etc etc.

Yes he can? No he can't. Poor thing wants to reinvent the wheel. jdfu!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Poor democracynowiniraq Posted by: desidid
» RE: Poor democracynowiniraq Posted by: nochicagoboys
» OMG Posted by: democracynowiniraq
The young are independent, libertarian and socially responsible
Posted by: Libertarian Paternalist on Jun 26, 2008 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The key to winning this vote is the young and the independent vote.

According to studies the indpendent vote is at an all time high 25 %. 25 % of all voters profess libertarian values and among young voters over 40 %.

Independent voters and young voters are dead tired of the political debate of the Babyboomers the stale class, race, religion and gender division, hatemongering. The are tired of divisive leaders such as Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, John Edwards and Hillary Clinton.

Independent voters and the young are tired of the government stickinging its nose both in their wallets and in their bedrooms. There is no difference between Big Government Democrats or George W Bush Christian Conservatives, they want to regulate and control all aspects of your life. The only thing that differs are their morals, not their means.

Terry Michael has fashioned the story to capture the independent vote and the young in his libertarian Democrat Manifesto

We need a new story. Here’s a rough cut, a little more than can fit on a bumper sticker, assembled around the three fundamental issue frames of politics – economic, social, and foreign policy:

“Government: assure liberty by staying as far away as possible from our bank accounts, our bedrooms, and our bodies. Spread pluralistic democracy and free markets by example, understanding that neither can be planted by force on political real estate lacking indigenous cultivators for their growth. Restore the moral authority of mid-20th century “civil rights,” fashioning public policy around individuals, not tribal identity groups.”


Libertarian Paternalist

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Young and, pardon me, dumb Posted by: Tara Downer
People are programmable idiots
Posted by: warble on Jun 26, 2008 7:46 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I went around trying to get signatures from the Gay community at a Parade here in Philadelphia. It was a frustrating endeavor to promote Ralph Nader because most gay people had it in their head that Ralph Nader was responsible for Gore losing the election. In other words, the news had disseminated the idea that Ralph Nader was a spoiler.

The idea that primaries and elections should be a free-for-all and that the top vote getters should have a run off as in other countries never seemed to cross anyone's mind. The idea that the two-party system was a monopoly and rigged is hard to convey.

Well, there is this aura about Obama that he is going to CHANGE things. Everyone is fixed on his image and no one is thinking about issues. It is like the Media that lies to you everyday still has the power to program everyone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tired of this Pigeon Hoeling
Posted by: thehousedog on Jun 26, 2008 10:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Scientists, politicians and those with nothing else to do are always trying to categorize people by race, gender, ethnicity and a host of other attributes to see how they do what they do and why. Give us a break! People will do what they want based on the moment and a bunch of decision factors that go on in their head. Nobody knows why and for once, can we leave the mystery of why decisions are made to a "human factor" that we don't need to categorize? I am so sick and tired of hearing why one type of person will vote for candidate X while another will vote for candidate Y. It's like those people who have all the answers why the price of gasoline keeps going up - and no matter what the question is - they have the answer. In the end, it is all B.S. - they make it up as they go along, and if you asked 5 scientists "why" you would get 6 opinions. Who cares any more.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The net best thing since the declaration of Independence
Posted by: solrev on Jun 26, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It would be nice to think the day will come, when know one registers to vote as a demon or repuk. It is nice to see that young people are wising up to the label game. Every four years you can count on two things, the same old party lines and Nader. The net providing the opportunity for an individual to finance a campaign is a big step in the right direction. There may be hope for this democracy after all, independent voters and finance. Someone is not going to like that combination. They will lose control, if they can not control the democracy with bucks, they may have to do it the old fashion way and use bullets.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Individuals can't see the forest for all the trees
Posted by: HistArch on Jun 26, 2008 12:12 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's great that us young people were all raised to think individually about diversity and have confidence in themselves. But we don't have any platform to stand on. We just chill out thinking individual thoughts about individual issues while the ground is being sold out beneath our feet. Acknowledgement of diversity and individuality is an evoultionary milestone because previous generations thought of themselves as part of a group (ex. Democratic Americans vs. Comunist Soviet, Capitalists vs. Socialists, Baby Boomers vs. the Greatest Generation ect.). The benefit of being a member of a group is that you have the momentum of the masses behind you and can force change.

But these movements were somewhat shortsighted because they didn't recognize the individual motives within their group. That pluralism caused the breakdown of the Civil Rights/Feminism/Gay Rights movement because the majority of liberals got caught up in infighting (best seen through university diversity advocacy during the 70s and 80s and in the McGovern campaign in '72). Essentially, us liberals have weakened ourselves at precisely the same time conservatives strengthened their platform. With liberals all freaking out about their individual agendas, we leave the bigger picture to the conservative minority.

The next sociopolitical evolutionary step is to understand the integral way all of this works and channel that into a paradigm of betterment. We need a little bit of the selfish conservative approach in order to keep ourselves afloat. The world is not fair and not everyone has the same advantages. Liberalism can be used to even out the playing field, but conservativism can be used as a motivator to keep us productive. Also, we need nukes, aircraft carriers, space-based weapons and other sinister devices to keep us from getting wiped out like the French in WWII. But we don't need so many weapons that people can't get an education or a home loan or food to eat. We can all make our country better by convincing conservatives that the world is not a winner-take-all place and by liberals recognizing that not everyone deserves the right to do whatever they want.

Environmentalism, diversity, capitalism all have their own benefits. But we need to discover what they are and take what we need. Most importantly, young people need to recognize that they are individuals first, members of a family second, Americans third, and, finally, part of a sociopolitical philosophy. Without all of those parts young people won't be able to make change.

Oh, yeah. Obama is our best hope but its pretty sad that a sound byte is all we've got to vote for. OBAMA '08

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Healthy Partisanship
Posted by: Dianka on Jul 14, 2008 11:42 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Each time there is a focus on ending divisiveness and partisan politics, the Democratic Party lurches to the right.
We need to have more than one party representing more than one section of the population. Ideally, representatives with diverse agendas sit down to hash out their differences, sometimes contentiously, to reach agreements that are in the best interests of the public. This (ideally) protects the US from single-party rule.

Democracy isn't tidy, and divisive partisan battles are vitally important to block efforts to establish a dictatorship.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]