Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

The Family's Values: America's Most Influential (and Secretive) Religious Organization

By ZP Heller, AlterNet. Posted June 16, 2008.


Jeff Sharlet's The Family will leave you stunned by the religious motivations behind seemingly every political decision in the last 70 years.
thefamily
The Family

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by ZP Heller

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Jeff Sharlet's The Family is a hair-raising account that will leave you stunned by the religious motivations behind seemingly every political decision in the last 70 years. As the title suggests, Sharlet's book focuses on the Family, a highly secretive, elite fundamentalist organization that wields political power behind the scenes. The Family, also known as the Fellowship, believes in God-driven government whose precepts are spread by top level, "key men" throughout the world. This is creepy religious imperialism at its most harrowing, which Sharlet delivers through fascinating historical accounts blended with personal anecdotes of the year he spent living with the Family in its picturesque estate along the Potomac River, Ivanwald.

Having covered all manner of religious sects for Rolling Stone and Harper's, Sharlet's intentions for living at Ivanwald were innocuous at first. What he encountered was so disturbing, however, that he felt compelled to investigate the Family's shadowy role in shaping elite American fundamentalism into a highly effective political tool. The Family is much more than its National Prayer Breakfasts, which have been presided over by every President for the last 50 years since Eisenhower helped launch them in 1953. As Sharlet writes, "the Family's long-term project of a worldwide government under God is more ambitious than Al Qaeda's dream of a Sunni empire."

Sharlet masterfully weaves through the underpinnings of elite fundamentalism, as he discusses Jonathan Edwards's Great Awakening and Charles Grandison Finney's populist evangelicalism. In doing so, he hits upon a love of power that is both "divine and worldly," which simultaneously explicates the Family's core principles and America's soft empire.

Since the Family is only as powerful as its leaders, it comes as no surprise that Sharlet devotes the majority of the book to the influence of Family founder Abraham "Abram" Vereide and his successor (the Family's current head) Doug Coe. It was Abram who thought up "the Idea" of trickle-down faith spread by "key men" to the elite leaders around the world -- the Family's prevailing ethos being "every Christian a leader, every leader a Christian." And it was Abram who decided that organized labor had no place in an elite fundamentalist worldview that catered to CEOs and dictatorial leaders. Of course, polite Christians couldn't very well attack or destroy labor unions, but they could force them into "cooperation."

It was also Abram who epitomized the Family's fascination with fascism. Early on, you get a sense that perhaps the Family's authoritarian interests derive from their warped desire to emulate such power structures within their own organization, sans bloodshed or genocide. "Doug Coe listed other men who had changed the world through the strength of the covenants they had forged with their 'brothers,'" writes Sharlets. "'Look at Hitler,' he said. 'Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, bin Laden.' The Family possessed a weapon those leaders lacked: the 'total Jesus' of a brotherhood in Christ."

When Sharlet explores Abram's past, however, you come to grim realization that the Family's fascist leanings are literal as well as metaphorical. Abram didn't merely form bonds with vicious anti-Semites like Henry Ford, Merwin Hart, Charles Lindbergh, or Frank Buchman, who once said, "I thank heaven for a man like Adolf Hitler." He also cavorted with Nazis in postwar Germany, ostensibly in an attempt to orchestrate the country's "moral rehabilitation."

Sharlet suggests that no one is beyond the Family's reach. First you have your usual suspects: Ed Meese, Reagan's anti-porn attorney general who once helped secure an oil pipeline for Saddam Hussein; Chuck Colson, the Watergate criminal who was "born again" and started his powerful faith-based Prison Fellowship initiative; and Rep. Joe Pitts and Sen. Sam Brownback, who united over their hatred of reproductive rights but also to push lucrative energy trade deals in Central Asian nations with awful human rights records (in part to stop the spread of Islam). Then you have your drop-in visitors like Clarence Thomas, who retreated to Ivanwald during the Anita Hill scandal, or President Ford, who prayed with his small prayer group (or "cell") before pardoning Nixon. Even both Bushes, who are technically not members of the Family themselves, are considered Family "relations" because they have surrounded themselves with Family members such as James Baker, Jack Kemp, Dan Quayle, and John Ashcroft.

And then there's Hillary Clinton, who as First Lady joined a Family prayer group with the wives of James Baker, Jack Kemp, Dennis Bakke, and Bill Nelson. Clinton praised Family leader Doug Coe in her memoir: "Doug Coe, the longtime National Prayer Breakfast organizer, is a unique presence in Washington: a genuinely loving spiritual mentor and guide to anyone, regardless of party or faith, who wants to deepen his or her relationship with God." Clinton's Family ties led to her collaboration with Brownback and Colson on anti-sex trafficking legislation, which gave money to faith-based groups preaching Christ and abstinence to foreign sex slaves, while stripping funds from federal organizations that provided health care to prostitutes. Clinton also pushed for the Religious Freedom Act, which put the monitoring of the world's religions in the hands on an evangelical agency. And her hawkish stance on Iran, Sharlet contends, is in keeping with the Family's elite fundamentalist views as well.

Even more startling than the Family's relationship with Clinton, however, is its support of brutal dictators. Not only did Family members in Congress push for the United States' proxy wars against the so-called threat of Communism, but they also reached out to some of the most ruthless mass murderers of the 20th century. Francois "Papa Doc" Duvalier impressed Senators on the Foreign Relations Committee (Family members) so much that they pushed an alliance that offered foreign aid and sugar tariffs exemptions. Gen. Park Chung Hee of South Korea used the Family to channel illegal funds to Nixon's congressional candidates.

Perhaps most disturbingly, Coe personally helped Gen. Suharto of Indonesia create his own Indonesian National Prayer Breakfast to commemorate the decree by which Suharto took power and slaughtered hundreds of thousands of Indonesians. The dictator list goes on and on: Somalia's Siad Barre, Angola's Jonas Savimbi; Brazil's Costa e Silva, Uganda's Yoweri Museveni. In defending his friendships with these dictators, Coe said in 1997, "They come to me. And I do what Jesus did: I don't turn my back to any one. You know, the Bible is full of mass murderers."

If these dictators did indeed approach Coe, as he suggested, it was because they understood the Family's political influence. It was Biarre's loyalty to Coe and the Family, for instance, that gained him access to Reagan, which subsequently doubled Somalia's military aid budget. And it was Suharto's Family connections that garnered him President Ford's blessing (and U.S. bullets) for seizing East Timor and slaughtering hundreds of thousands in 1975. More than anything else, the Family-forged backroom deals make The Family a head-spinning read. Just as it does for Sharlet, who, in a rare blowup in the book, wants to lash out at a Family member who asks him to consider joining the Family after reading Sharlet's excerpted piece in Harper's last year. These are the deals that benefit the dictators and CEOs of the world at the devastating expense of the general public, some of which left me wondering if these foreign dictators actually believed in Coe's version of Christianity, or were they merely usurping the Family's power?

But The Family is much more than a who's who of 20th century religio-politics. It's more like a fascinating family tree, which strips the bark to reveal a sturdy core belief in "Jesus plus nothing," and then takes you from branch to branch, each more dizzying than the last.

Note: Don't miss Lindsay Beyerstein's AlterNet interview with author Jeff Sharlet about "The Family."

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: the family, jeff sharlet

Zack Pelta-Heller is a regular contributor to AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Grand Style Hypocrites
Posted by: talkville on Jun 16, 2008 1:15 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Self-appointed and -anointed organizations such as this one have been on a long and tireless, a tiresome, crusade on behalf of "values", "culture war", "the values-voter" (e.g. the acquisition and maintenance of their own self appointed 'right to command').

Everywhere they proclaim "Values!" (surreptitiously meaning "Evaluations" and idiosyncratic "Interpretations"), ALWAYS referring to these as a plural and general and universally transparent and understood term that requires no explanations, no precision -- precisely what values? in what order of rank? which ones over which other ones? In what circumstances? This is all supposedly simply understood by 'everyone', as clear as day.

These people HOLD, they don't PRACTICE, 'values'; they keep these in a kind of tool-box in a shed, to be brought out in accordance with the needs of the moment, changing them one-for-another at a moment's notice, in accordance with the requirements of Expediency, Convenience and Utility (for THEM). The relation to truths or realities or facts are completely arbitrary and random -- whatever suits the needs of the moment- political, economic, or socio-cultural; just as long as they remain 'on top'.

Just holding all these Grand Style Hypocrites to Practice, Specify and actually live this grand bravado of theirs would rapidly bring into the light of day their utter and complete emptiness and corruption. But it's always more expedient and easier to preach to others. In their tool-boxes they have lots and lots of 'values' evaluations and instant judgments, ready at a moment's notice to call into service. What they completely lack, however, is any principles whatsoever other than those of Self-Service and Agrandizement. They always thrive in dark and secret places, for what they fear most is clarity and light (e.g.: accountability).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Family Values
Posted by: mike_burns on Jun 16, 2008 2:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If a white, Southern, Christian girl gets pregnant she should not have an abortion. I the baby is black, the abortion is mandatory. That illustrates their real values. They really have none. The just have a thirst for power.
You don't have to go into deep research to discover the evil. Go to any church. You may not see it at first, but you will see that it is all about power and money. That is the real religion. I have tried to go to church, on and off, for a lifetime. That is all I saw there. Power and greed. They are wolves in sheep's clothing, and false prophets. It is a mental illness that everybody has to suffer from, regardless whether you want anything to do with it. There is nothing wrong with a spiritual belief, but organized religion is the most evil force there is. No wonder communist countries tried to purge it.
I suppose Obama will have to join the brother hood, too, and turn his back on his teachings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Family Values Posted by: opmoc
» RE: Family Values Posted by: Dboy
the eternal war
Posted by: twoten on Jun 16, 2008 9:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as lions and hyenas have always been and always will be at war in the African savanna, so are the true humans and the inhuman psychopaths locked in an eternal battle to the death. Everything you know about human history contains blatant and glaring evidence to this.

The Pharaohs, the Emperors, the Popes, the Kings, the Barons and now the Presidents and the Ceos, all the atrocities and inhuman crimes of the past and present were not committed by humans, but by psychopaths and their human slaves and enablers. It's time to wake up people.

We need laws that say that if you are a psychopath, you cannot be a publicly elected official, you cannot be promoted in a publicly traded company, you cannot be a member of any police or military force. We need laws that make it illegal for psychopaths to be in any position of power. Until then we're just letting the child molesters be the principals in the kindergarten.

Until the real humans slap themselves out of their stupor, recognize the enemy and take the fight to them, we will be living in a world poisoned by the devils who sell antidotes.

Silence is collusion. The mainstream media are no better than Renfeld, Count Dracula's disgusting and pathetic slave. We must drag these insane monsters out from behind their curtains of darkness. Now that they have castrated the media, they are moving fast.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George Bush May Become a Catholic Like Tony Blair To Claim His Get Out of Hell Free Card
Posted by: opmoc on Jun 16, 2008 11:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If both Bush and Blair are going to be in Heaven, I think I would rather go to hell.

Bush's European tour just makes me puke. The less said the better.

linked text

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

wasnt Archie Bunker...
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 16, 2008 2:23 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and Edith arrested co-conspirators in this cult back in the 70's?

freaks like these can get away with spewing hate for generations under the guise of religion, while commoners are thrown in jail for petty and most often questionable circumstances...

anybody see a root of the problem here?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Family
Posted by: Krain61 on Jun 16, 2008 3:19 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Family: Better known as The Fderal Reserve and Corporate America and Your Political figures getting Churches to help sell there trash..What's not so funny about it is Americans are buying there BullShit.
The family has many faces and we need to wake up and pay attention.Some of us have been awake but it's the dam othere 98% who need to wake up..
Plus we are screwing up the world around us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The Family Posted by: Dboy
Ah Ha!
Posted by: buzzsaw on Jun 16, 2008 5:35 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This must be the family they mean when they say "Family Values."

buzzsaw

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mother Teresa is a perfect example of defrauding the public trust through ABUSING religion.
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 16, 2008 7:38 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And this Christian is against evangelical Christians or for that matter any religious extremists be they Muslim, Hindu, Maoist, or whatever . Think that Mother Teresa was an angel? Do a google search for "Mother Teresa" and "Christopher Hitchens" . Prepare to be HEAVILY disappointed.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Christopher Hitchens Posted by: zipper696
the family
Posted by: chloe08 on Jun 16, 2008 8:13 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
cosa nostra. Religion is always the front for fascism.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Media Bias?
Posted by: AlexLawyer on Jun 16, 2008 10:30 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Hillarites complain that Obama got a free ride, but a few off-the-wall but innocuous comments by Reverend Wright were endlessly replayed on TV while Clinton's long, deep involvement with this outfit were withheld from the public by the mainstream media.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I guess I'm preaching against something I feel...
Posted by: aussidawg on Jun 17, 2008 5:53 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
hatred. I am so damn sick of pseudo=Christian Calvinists getting the last word in on anything done in this country in the name of "values." They preach this and that but then violate everything they preach about. These are the most self serving assholes the world has had to sufffer. My number one wish is that someday, sometime, someone will use that brain given them by "God" and use it for what is was "designed." To think!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Clinton revealed
Posted by: zipper696 on Jun 19, 2008 10:19 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
aren't we even gladder now that she blew the candidacy?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement