Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Veterans Affairs Tells Court It Can't Imagine Voter Registration Drives for Its Wounded Veterans and the Homeless

By Steven Rosenfeld, AlterNet. Posted June 12, 2008.


The VA's attorney tells a federal appeals court that voters registration drives are a partisan distraction.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
What Can the Morass of the 1970s Tell Us About the Current Economic Crisis?
Alejandro Reuss

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Does the House Bill's Public Option Kill Off the Senate's?
Booman

Immigration:
Recent Democratic Victories May Grease the Wheels for Immigration Reform in Congress
Marcelo Balive

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Obama Is Up Against in His Own Branch of Government
Russ Baker

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
"Precious" Star Claims the Spotlight
Emily Wilson

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Radioactive Wastewater in New York Raises More Concerns About Oil Drilling
Abrahm Lustgarten

World:
Egyptian Marine: Soldiers Often 'Racialize' the Enemy to Cope With Stress
Aaron Glantz

More stories by Steven Rosenfeld

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

An attorney for the Department of Veterans Affairs, which runs hospitals and homeless shelters for veterans, told a federal appeals court Thursday that the VA could not conceive of any circumstance where voter registration drives could occur at its facilities.

"This is an activity that could be seen as harming the appearance of the VA's neutrality," said Owen Martikan, assistant U.S. attorney representing the agency, adding voter registration drives would interfere with patient medical care and also violate the federal Hatch Act, which limits federal employees from participating in political campaign activities.

"If you cure the problem of overt partisanship, you are creating another problem," Martikan said. "Once you let in someone else, you are not being neutral unless you let everyone in."

But Scott Rafferty, a Washington, D.C.-based attorney who has spent several years arguing the VA must allow voter registration drives to help wounded former soldiers register and vote, disagreed.

"Integrating veterans into the communities that they live in is the highest honor we can award veterans," Rafferty told the court.

The issue before a federal appeals court in San Francisco is whether restrictions on voter registration drives at the VA's campus in nearby Menlo Park are unconstitutional.

The case has national significance. The VA has facilities across the country serving thousands of veterans. In 1994, then-President Bill Clinton ordered the VA to help register veterans. However, the VA ceased allowing voter registration drives during the Bush administration.

Several U.S. senators and California's secretary of state, all Democrats, have asked the VA to become a voter registration agency like motor vehicle departments. This spring, the VA issued a new policy saying it would help vets -- who asked for help -- to register and to vote. The VA also said it would allow nonpartisan voter registration drives, but then rescinded the policy on registration drives.

The suit before the federal appeals court is revisiting the question of whether Steve Preminger, chair of the Santa Clara County Democratic Central Committee -- where the Menlo Park facility is located -- has standing to question the constitutionality of the VA's policy.

On Thursday, judges from the three-judge panel asked the VA if there was any circumstance where it could conceive of a nonpartisan voter registration drive. One judge said students at her daughter's high school were given voter registration forms when they are 17-1/2 years old -- and asked why veterans cannot be given the same opportunity?

"It's a different environment than a school," Martikan said. "It means diverting resources from patient care."

Another judge laid out a scenario where anyone who would participate in voter registration efforts would not wear campaign buttons or say what party they belonged to. He asked if the VA would object to a voter registration drive if participants were told "no partisan activities."

That would not satify the VA, Martikan said, saying, the "VA has different interests."

Martikan said that Preminger and an associate came onto the VA campus in a car that had an "impeach Bush" bumper sticker. "They introduced themselves as members of the Democratic Party," he said, adding it was a fiction that registration drive participants could "pretend to be nonpartisan."

After the hearing, Preminger said his attempts to register voters were neither overtly partisan nor disruptive.

"I don't carry myself that way -- not at all," he said.

Preminger said Republican Party volunteers have been able to visit the Menlo Park facility to register voters.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: election 2008, voter registration, veterans affairs

Steven Rosenfeld is a senior fellow at Alternet.org and co-author of "What Happened in Ohio: A Documentary Record of Theft and Fraud in the 2004 Election," with Bob Fitrakis and Harvey Wasserman (The New Press, 2006).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
2 sets of rules?
Posted by: Lilah on Jun 12, 2008 9:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Wow, they saved the kicker for the last paragraph: "Preminger said Republican Party volunteers have been able to visit the Menlo Park facility to register voters."

So isn't it overtly partisan for the base to allow Republican volunteers to operate, but bar those of another party???

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The VA IS GOING TO BURN IN A FIRE OF WMD PROPORTIONS FOR F$$KING US< VETERANS
Posted by: Turiye on Jun 12, 2008 11:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
N/F/E

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That the "VA ceased allowing voter registration drives during the Bush administration"...
Posted by: gazooks on Jun 13, 2008 4:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... is the real ass kicker.

Obviously, and pathetically, many Vets are rightfully seen as now opposing this protracted engagement along with it's cynical, lying and hypocritical political sponsors.

So it's only natural, for those that think that exploiting young Americans as fodder for political and economic gain, would not want them expressing the reality of opposition to a immoral lie with a vote.

Add it to the long list of abhorrent and disgusting outrages pitifully accepted by Congressional oversight at the expense of those now at the mercy of bureaucratic inertia and political indifference.

Please, write to or call any or all of those below and express your disgust, your anger and your determination to not let this injustice stand.

Senate Armed Services Committee

228 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, DC 20510
(202) 224-3871

FULL COMMITTEE MEMBERS


DEMOCRATS

Carl Levin (Michigan)
Chairman

Edward M. Kennedy (Massachusetts)
Robert C. Byrd (West Virginia)
Joseph I. Lieberman (Connecticut)
Jack Reed (Rhode Island)
Daniel K. Akaka (Hawaii)
Bill Nelson (Florida)
E. Benjamin Nelson (Nebraska)
Evan Bayh (Indiana)
Hillary Rodham Clinton (New York)
Mark L. Pryor (Arkansas)
Jim Webb (Virginia)
Claire McCaskill (Missouri)

REPUBLICANS
John McCain (Arizona)
Ranking Member

John W. Warner (Virginia)
James M. Inhofe (Oklahoma)
Jeff Sessions (Alabama)
Susan M. Collins (Maine)
Saxby Chambliss (Georgia)
Lindsey O. Graham (South Carolina)
Elizabeth Dole (North Carolina)
John Cornyn (Texas)
John Thune (South Dakota)
Mel Martinez (Florida)
Roger F. Wicker (Mississippi)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Support our troops? Hah!
Posted by: realist on Jun 13, 2008 5:29 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This administration is the same bunch that whined during the infamous Florida recount of 2000 that Gore was trying to ignore votes from servicemen overseas. But they have no problem ignoring the voting rights of veterans? Guess they figure soldiers are less likely to vote Republican once they come back from Iraq.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hatch Act
Posted by: dr_dredd on Jun 13, 2008 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That's crap. I've read the Hatch Act, and it doesn't prevent all political activity, only partisan activity. A federal employee can't run for partisan public office (e.g. mayor, etc.), but can run for office in community service or other non-political organizations. So as long as the drives are non-partisan, they're legal. The administration's just looking for an excuse.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Tobi Dragert, Director, Los Angeles Area Impeachment Center
Posted by: Teedee on Jun 13, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I appreciate AlterNet more than any other, but speaking of veterans, I wonder why there is no mention of Veterans for Peace presenting John Conyers the other day with 22,000 signatures calling for impeachment of G.W. Bush.

Come to think of it, there is very little mention of impeachment here, or anywhere. Seems to me there is no more urgent issue facing Americans right now than whether or not to preserve the Constitution. More important than the price of oil, or digital tv.

Please place some emphasis on Dennis Kucinich's 35 Articles of Impeachment. Analyze them one by one, see whether there is truth to them. If so, let us take the steps needed to bring about justice. Time may be short, but it is not too late! Not until January 21, 2009.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

That answer is Horse Dung, VA
Posted by: robbie.seal on Jun 13, 2008 9:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the military, we are able to provide and even help our personnel all over the world register to vote in their various localities. We train officers and non-commissioned officers and they are "Voting Officers". They provide troopers with information and provide the material to get registered. We also encourage them to vote. There are strict guidlines under which the voting officers must act to maintain not just the appearance, but maintain strict neutrality. If we can do it from some buttcrack place in the desert, the VA can do it from their air-conditioned offices. Just get off your butt and do it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What the hell did they think they were Fighting FOR
Posted by: JSquercia on Jun 13, 2008 11:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What the HELL did those vets think they were fighting FOR . Wasn't it supposed to be for Freedom and the Constitution ? The Administration doesn't want to have poor people such as the Homeless Vets voting . It is NOT in the interest of the Republican Party to encourage voter participation . Their game is voter suppression . Can't let those 90 year old Nuns in Indiana vote can we Justice Roberts .

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

VA isn't a fiefdom.
Posted by: 8 nontheist on Jun 13, 2008 4:43 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who operate the VA may have heard that the VA resembles a fiefdom like the fiefs which existed before democracy replaced rule by divine right given by a god. The problem is that these bureaucrats really believe this nonsense & run [down] the VA as a feifdom. It's time for the Congress & veterans enlighten the VA's brass from VACO to VA field stations that it's 2008 & the VA is a mere agency in a democracy. The VA must be taught to respect the rights of veterans by the Congress & the veterans it cares for. Both the Congress & veterans must muzzle & keep the VA's brass on a short tight leash so that the VA's brass doesn't act like despotic, barons & lords of the manor anymore. The VA's brass are creatures of habit; they have been allowed to develop attitudes & habits which can't be tolerated in a democracy.
The VA's brass need to be retrained & restrained as the VA is reformed. The VA's Brass from the Secretary of Veterans Affairs on down may have to be removed from office if they can't or won't learn to respect veterans's rights. Requiring the VA's brass to give a full account of their conduct to the nations veterans & the Congress yearly & more often if the VA or a given facility or a department [service] fails to act as if it was serving clients in a democracy is essential.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

free elections, means free voters!!!
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 13, 2008 5:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It appears to me that the government's main focus, has been on keeping, and expanding their parties power, at the expence of all other's!!! How many Americans are excluded, from the right to vote??? Convicts, x-cons, nuns, and of course veterans!!! Why??? Because, they're not Republicans, that's why!!!The new head of the Libertarian party Bob Barr(former Repug drug czar) called, all of the former libertarian freedom fighters( former, because the repugs, took over the L.P. and kicked us out of our own party) NON-ENTITIES!!!Non-entities, and Entities, don't exist in a FREE-NATION!!! We have become the SLAVES, of the public SERVANTS!!! I was kicked off of the balot for governor of Missouri, and right out of the L.P. Because, our Government considers, the people as NON-ENTITIES, I DARE CONCIDER THAT TREASON!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its the New Wall, Same as the Old Wall
Posted by: anambrose on Jun 13, 2008 11:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Going to DC in 1984 on Veteran's Day to the ceremony that added the three soldier statue added to the Vietnam Memorial I kept coming across homeless vets who were sleeping on subway grates. The grates looked exactly like the grates over the subways in NYC and they were warm. It was Cold with a Hawk like wind. On radio talk shows the homeless, one third of whom were veterans,didn't exist. It was a fiction they said and it was hard to judge if it was the ditto heads or the Reaganites and RR himself that was the biggest perpetuator of the myth that we were just ghosts. The attitude was that anyone who was seriously screwed up couldn't negotiate the VA's labyrinthine puzzle box to get what little help could be had ergo every one else was just malingering and gaming the system. Lose Lose. The right and the republicans have looked since Truman to limit voting access of any group that could be a threat by any means necessary. Since veterans from 1948 on came out of a draft system and served in integrated units created by Truman's executive order they were viewed as a threat to the status quo of Separate But Equal common in 'civil society'. Why? Because their very experience in an integrated military blew up the stereotypes found on both sides of the color line. Integration was not only possible it was actually preferable to maintain good order, discipline and unit combat effectiveness and esprit de corps. As Vietnam wound up and then wound down we started to lose the access our fathers had through the same service organizations. The bottom line was unlike the 'good war' the veterans from the '60's era were far more fragmented and the older generation of veterans were less than welcoming. The point here is that what is past is prologue and as in 2000 there is no level too low for them to stoop if it means increasing their power. This new crop of veterans have already started their own conflict specific service organizations and as the fecal matter continues to hit the rotary oscillator their ranks will continue to grow. Any sign that this new bunch will actually vote their self interest will have the other side stocking up on Depends. They will use every and any lame excuse to stop the veteran from actually having a say in how they will be deployed and how they will be taken care if at all of when coming home. The Army now has their latest weapon of labeling veterans with PTSD claiming they actually have a pre existing personality disorder to stop them from being able to access VA help. When they cannot get help on the inside they get a less than honorable discharge for self medicating and not only cannot get the help they deserve but then have to pay back any bonuses paid for enlistment or re enlistment. So its more a matter of that once you are out no matter what the condition:" you are now one of them and no longer one of us". That's what you get when you have an all volunteer armed service that comes from an ever narrowing cross section of the American public. They are great professionals and know their job like no one before them but their insularity is becoming toxic and only a program of National Service is going to broaden it. You do not want a military caste established and the longer the current situation exists the closer we get. If people in my generation couldn't conceive of a president worse than Nixon (yeah Okay Reagan Too) and have the military go insular and hold a grudge that it was the media and the college kids that lost Vietnam. Let it fester for 35+ years and have Nixon's gofers grow up to be Cheney and Rumsfeld. Imagine 35 years from now? If we have another attack maybe a lot sooner. We have another bad King George or Georgette and the generals go along to get along and we have another best Congress money can buy and a willfully blind press we will lose what little democracy is left or tear down what we and our children manage to rebuild.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement