Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Obama Shows His Punch

By Robert L. Borosage, Huffington Post. Posted June 11, 2008.


Obama takes a clean, connecting swing at Bush and McCain's disastrous economic policies.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Robert L. Borosage

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Yesterday in Raleigh, North Carolina, Barack Obama opened the general election fight, taking the gloves off against the "tired and misguided [economic] philosophy that has dominated Washington for too long," and offering a clear challenge to the Bush-McCain economic misrule. In Washington before the National Federation of Independent Business, McCain counterpunched, suggesting the choice was between low taxes and "the largest tax increase since World War II."

This argument will be the big kahuna in this election. Despite ritual boosterism, soothing rhetoric and quiet prayers by Wall Street pundits, the economy is foul and likely to get much worse. We've lost jobs for five months in a row. Gas, food, health care costs are soaring. For workers, the mess is worse than the stagflation of the 1970s. Then growth was stagnant, while prices and wages were spiraling up. Now we've got stagflation squared -- with growth and wages stagnant, prices on basics soaring, while the value of homes, the largest investment Americans have, is plummeting.

Many aren't making it. Home foreclosures are the highest since the great depression. One in six homes in America is worth less than the mortgage. With prices down 14% from last year, Americans have seen $2.5 trillion in wealth erased. No wonder credit card debt has soared, and workers are rifling retirement accounts.

President Bush and John McCain say the "fundamentals are strong," so the downturn is a "rough patch." As the president left for Europe, he once more celebrated our "open and flexible" economy, with "some of the deepest and most liquid capital markets" [he's apparently been AWOL the last months], arguing that the "long term health and strong foundation of our economy will shine through and be reflected in currency values."

Bush and Republicans in Congress have been resisting any new stimulus measures, arguing that the $600 rebate checks going out in the stimulus package are just kicking in, and that things will get better.

Not likely. Gas prices will chew up the rebates -- while racking up rising trade deficits. And beginning in July, states and localities will be laying off teachers and police, deferring construction projects as they struggle with rising deficits. And the banks staggered by the collapse of the financial bubble are now about to face the rising credit card, auto loan and mortgage defaults that come with an economic downturn.

Why are we in this mess? Obama put the blame for this directly on the Bush-McCain economic strategy. The current crisis, he argued, wasn't simply "some accident of history," or "an inevitable part of a business cycle." It was the "logical conclusion" of a "worn dogma" that has failed this country.

Obama called for a second short term $50 billion stimulus, for aiding homeowners facing foreclosure through no fault of their own, and for extending unemployment benefits for those workers caught in the economic ebb tide. Bush and Congressional Republicans have resisted these measures.

But he also began to contrast his longer range strategy for rebuilding America to the failed trickle-down, market fundamentalism and fiscal irresponsibility of the past years: "For eight long years, our president sacrificed investments in health care, and education, and energy, and infrastructure on the altar of tax breaks for big corporations and wealthy CEOs -- trillions of dollars in giveaways that proved neither compassionate nor conservative.

And with McCain pledging to sustain that same course -- top end tax cuts and cuts in domestic spending -- Obama draws the contrast:

John McCain and I have a fundamentally different vision of where to take the country. Because for all his talk of independence, the centerpiece of his economic plan amounts to a full-throated endorsement of George Bush's policies. He says we've made great progress in our economy these past eight years. He calls himself a fiscal conservative, and on the campaign trail he's a passionate critic of government spending, and yet he has no problem spending hundreds of billions of dollars on tax breaks for big corporations and a permanent occupation of Iraq -- policies that have left our children with a mountain of debt.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: economy, mccain, barack obama, obama

Robert Borosage is co-director of the Campaign For America's Future, and he has written on political, economic, and national security issues for publications including The New York Times and The Nation.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Get in line behind Obama
Posted by: robbie.seal on Jun 11, 2008 10:54 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To get your fingerprints taken...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Get in line behind Obama Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Get in line behind Obama Posted by: nochicagoboys
» We'll see Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: We'll see Posted by: aji
» RE: We'll see Posted by: Wacre
» RE: Get in line behind Obama Posted by: leafsong1
» Please explain... Posted by: robbie.seal
I like Obama more and more, with each passing day
Posted by: nochicagoboys on Jun 11, 2008 10:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good for you, Senator Obama. So far, I like what you're saying. It's about time someone spoke on behalf of the common American citizen, instead of the pandering to the wealthy and corporations that we've had to endure for so many long years.

Again, kudos to you!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bush III vs. Reality I
Posted by: Longdream on Jun 11, 2008 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
With Hillary gone, we're finally going to hear what the Democratic candidate has to say about the future.

Jimmy Carter made some mistakes and had some triumphs, but one thing stood out about him: he had a commitment to alternative sources of clean energy, and sponsored programs to develop it and make it viable.

Then Reagan happened, and anything Carter did was swept away and forgotten. No President since Carter has fully explored, as a national cause and a necessary part of our economy, the alternatives that will help save our environment and keep us warm, cool, well-lit and moving.

Let McCain try the smears. They won't work, because he has no real answers, and doesn't even know the questions. Solid solutions right now are what the people expect. We want good ones, we want them from a person we can trust, and we want them now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bush III vs. Reality I Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Bush III vs. Reality I Posted by: nochicagoboys
» Jimmy Carter and Iran Posted by: JibreelRiley
» RE: Jimmy Carter and Iran Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Jimmy Carter and Iran Posted by: Longdream
» George W. Bush and Iraq Posted by: aalif ba ta tha
Help Me!
Posted by: ChairmanMetal on Jun 11, 2008 11:13 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am at a complete loss to understand the thinking that goes into the sort of economic policies with which we have experimented these past 30 years or so. Well, OK, maybe I get the thinking, but I do NOT get the rational for clinging to these policies in light of all the evidence that says they do not work.

Precious little has trickled down. Free trade has led to the loss of jobs in the hundreds of thousands. Unregulated businesses have created quite a mess in our housing market. And the spending spree embarked upon by our "small government is better government" Republicans is beyond belief.

Does McCain really believe all this? Can someone help me understand this? Really.

Thanks.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Help Me! Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Bush I Nailed It Posted by: desidid
» RE: Bush I Nailed It Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Bush I Nailed It Posted by: leafsong1
» RE: Bush I Nailed It Posted by: desidid
» RE: Help Me! Posted by: Romans1
What gives here!
Posted by: carbon-based on Jun 11, 2008 11:33 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Economy doesn't seem to be Obama's strong point.. listening to his speech and McCains, I was surprised to hear that McCain's economic plan, if priced out, will balance the budget by his first term. Obama's plan will result in enormous spending and taxes..the complete opposite of what this country needs.

Then I read that if you make under $250,00 there is essentially little difference in the final tax bill under eithers plan!

Whats really clear though is that the small business owner wil lbear the brunt of Obama's plan! Increased payroll taxes hits us twice as hard as an individual. Increase SS taxes limits? Cap gains increases.. put your money, whats left, someplace else!

Who cares if the tax rate on $250,000 and above are increased, they can afford it.. small business and middle class are going to get hammered.

I have a strong support for Obama, but this first election salvo doesn't set well for him.. bash the small business owner and kiss the economy goodbye! I'm waiting to see how the details roll out! Hope it's not democrat tax and spend as usual!

An interesting analysis - combine both parts of the link
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/

2008/06/11/politics/horserace/entry4172820.shtml

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What gives here! Posted by: jreal
» RE: What gives here! Posted by: Longdream
» RE: What gives here! Posted by: carbon-based
» RE: What gives here! Posted by: Longdream
Obama had better get with the program and talk with Michael Greenberger..asap..!
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on Jun 11, 2008 11:57 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So far Obama is talking jive for the most part as to the real concerns of Americans over our economy..

If Obama doesn't address the Speculators who are running the price of oil out of sight and use the refer to the info Professor Michael Greenberger has made perfectly clear to so many then he's jerking us around like the average sold out Corporate Democrat..

How is the testimony of the former Director of the Commodities and Futures Trading Commission to The Senate Commerce Committee not relevant

Then also with Phil Gramm being that traitor McCain's chief economic adviser why isn't Obama pummeling McCain for being surrounded by swindlers who are up to their necks in both the Sub prime crisis and the price of a barrel of oil..being artificially manipulated..?

Gramm and those Enron traitors and traders are waging economic warfare against America and it's people and even our allies and McCain keeps telling his lies and talking about tax breaks for the wealthiest Americans and even bigger Tax breaks for our most greed ridden disloyal corporations..

Obama should be beating McCain like a rented mule instead he's talking fiddle faddle B.S....

Oh yeah real change yup you betcha..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The economy is indeed Obama's strongest card.
Posted by: non-person on Jun 11, 2008 12:06 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The basic facts are that the U.S. has outsourced all its manufacturing under NAFTA rules (promoted by the Clintons, and expanded by Bush under the SPP agreement). This lead to a balance-of-trade deficit, resulting in a skyrocketing U.S. debt as well as a decline in the value of the dollar.

The McCains are doing fine, however, since they can find European markets for their Chinese-manufactured goods, while the U.S. itself stagnates. This is the fundamental flaw in the neoliberal economic agenda of the Clintons and the Bushes.

It is an issues on which both corporate Democrats and Republicans all agree - which really reveals the depth of corruption in U.S. government and media and academics today - about 90% of them are diehard supporters of this disastrous neoliberal agenda.

The only thing worse than the neoliberal foreign policy agenda is the neoconservative militaristic foreign policy agenda - and agenda of aggressive warfare that comes right out of the National Socialist playbook.

Neither one is acceptable. We need to cancel all the "free trade agreements", end capital liberalization, and rebuild U.S. infrastructure and manufacturing capacity, starting with renewable energy manufacturing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carter did a whole lot more good than Bush.
Posted by: jreal on Jun 11, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, I guess if Carter did just one good thing that's more than Bush.

Carter realized that the nation was on the wrong path. Carter is the one who actually started deregulation. Yes, Carter.

It's because of carter that the trucking industry boomed, and the ailine industry boomed, and stocktrading boomed.

Carter also realized that the country needed to change focus economically. He understood that without starting fresh, we were going to see the Great Depression tenfold. That's what's up with the inflation in the late 70's and early 80's. It was something that was going to happen but it could have been worse.

Carter gave us some natural healing. It's just that when Reagan came in, Reagan trashed what Carter had started while it was still in infancy and easy to cherrypick all the negativity under Carter. Well, a baby can't walk when it's first born, but Reagan didn't seen to think that mattered

Reagan also took credit for Carter's military build up and excellerated it to a point that was obviously just a military complex handout.

So as Carter moved us into natural healing, Reagan took over and decided to give us some short term medecine that had disasterous long-term effects. Reagans medecine was more like crack and heroine. 'Feels good now, but the repurcussions are going to be painful. Unless you just keep feeding the country the crack and heroine to soothe the pains.

And then these 'crack politics' continued into the Bush Administration and it looks like McCain is the new Crack Dealer.

So maybe a new banner should be "Just say No, Stay Crack Free America."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On what reality will the change be based on?
Posted by: Richard House on Jun 11, 2008 12:09 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At this point, the change Obama speaks of is a mystical concept. So far, all I’ve seen are old politics between Obama and Clinton and now Obama and McCain. What is this “change” Obama speaks of? That depends on how eloquent the speaker is as he spouts conventional litany: ending the war in Iraq, ethical behavior in politics, universal health care, fairer taxes (don’t make me laugh). Okay, I buy what Obama says so far because I want to believe, I want him to be Camelot’s new knight, to end the polarization, to rid America of its fascist tendencies, get rid of the police state, rip up the Patriot Act, reign in the corporations.
GW Bush gave a face during the last eight years to America’s biggest problems but will Obama’s change mean Americans taking it to the streets? That could be more than anyone would care to bargain for.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Market Fundamentalism
Posted by: Lauren on Jun 11, 2008 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Bush's statement "some of the deepest and most liquid capital markets" isn't that "he's apparently been AWOL the last months" as the author suggests. What it describes is our capital market from HIS perspective, that of a prospector discussing a very productive mine he is working for all it is worth.

I'm afraid of what happens when the tank he is draining ASAP hits empty. Then what?

This same attitude is reflected in McCain's ludicrous comment that the estate tax is "one of the most unfair taxes on the books". It is only 'unfair' to incredibly rich PEOPLE LIKE HIM, thanks to his wife's beer fortune that is.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If You're Able, Do Your Part!
Posted by: desidid on Jun 11, 2008 12:41 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This month the Obama campaign is asking us to have an event in our homes to meet with other supporters. I'm offering my home for women who support Obama. I encourage the rest of you to get involved in the process. I also called his Senate office and e-mailed him regarding issues that are important to me. We have an opportunity to shape this campaign, and change this country. Invest in your future, if not for yourselves for you children and grandchildren.

BARACK THE VOTE!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Strangers can come to ours. Posted by: Longdream
Obama Economic Adviser Defended Wal-Mart
Posted by: Mystery Solver on Jun 11, 2008 1:35 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WASHINGTON -- Labor union officials and some liberal activists were seething Tuesday over Barack Obama's choice of centrist economist Jason Furman as the top economic advisor for the campaign. The critics say Furman, who was appointed to the post Monday, has overstated the potential benefits of globalization, Social Security private accounts and the low prices offered by Wal-Mart -- considered a corporate pariah by the labor movement.

http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/washingtondc/la-na

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dems are called Tax and Spend WHY are Not Republicans
Posted by: JSquercia on Jun 11, 2008 1:47 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Democrats are called Tax and Spend Why are the Republicans NOT called BORROW and Spend ? Remember when the Republicans wanted a Balanced Budget Amendment to the Constitution . Now they have only ONE solution to any Economic program and that is to Cut Taxes . Bush's first round of Tax cuts were supposedly to return the Surplus to the American Public . His second round was Keynsian to stimulate the Economy .Of course what he ignored is we had NEVER cut taxes during a war . I remember the top marginal rate during WWII was over 90% . Today we have a top rate of 35% and of course Capital gains is even lower . We have recently witnessed the Republicans protecting the loophole that allows the Managers of Hedge Funds to treat their compensation as Capital Gains and thus pay a lower percentage in taxes than their secretaries as Warren Buffet pointed out

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» WWII was many many moons ago Posted by: JibreelRiley
The Northeast Media Bloc would just carry Sen Obama's water
Posted by: JibreelRiley on Jun 11, 2008 2:05 PM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Really, so what the press is already fawning over Sen Bambi Obama giving him cover, I'm just glad that the polls that its not working too well

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Typo Posted by: nochicagoboys
» RE: Kinda Like I Do Posted by: desidid
Business as usual
Posted by: Romans1 on Jun 11, 2008 7:35 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Obama has had to distance himself from yet another close advisor. Only this time, it was not a pastor. It is the chairman of his VP vetting committee, Jim Johnson, who has all those special interest connections and ties to bad mortgages. It turns out Obama is no DC outsider. He's not 'change' and he's not Bobby Kennedy. He's just another politician.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come away.
Posted by: fferris on Jun 11, 2008 8:31 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
from "Hopeless in Chicago
Why I Can't Support Barack Obama"

By JOSHUA FRANK in Counterpunch.org, June 11, 2008

"Like the majority of his colleagues, Obama has done very little to change the face of American politics. He has voted for war spending, appeased the pro-Israel lobby, and helped build the erroneous case against Iran, saying nothing about Israel's plentiful arsenal of nuclear warheads. In short, Barack Obama is not an ally to those of us who oppose the ambiguous War on Terror. . .Obama supports the death penalty, opposes single-payer health care, supports nuclear energy, opposes a carbon pollution tax, supports the Cuba embargo, and will not end the vast array of federal subsidies to corporations, including those to the oil and gas cartel."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Obama's Record Posted by: desidid
Sounds like Obama has taking over Edwards mantle
Posted by: chaoslegs on Jun 13, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And pushing for progressive economic policies. As Naomi Klein said last weekend at NCMR, we must keep the pressure on Obama to carry through with these policies if he is elected.

You know why McCain thinks the estate tax, or what I call the wealth transference tax, an unfair tax. He knows that it will impact his kids one day and he wants them get all of the money handed to them with no government share taken.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I listen to Mark Thompson, a talk show host on Sirius Left.
Posted by: Longdream on Jun 13, 2008 3:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His show is called Make It Plain.

He has a way of phrasing things to make you think. He said that when an african-american person is not safe in this country, then no one is safe. Regarding Rev. Wright, he said that when a Presidential candidate is not free to attend the church of his choice, not one of us is free.

That is the insidious effect of partisan smear politics in this country. It kills the desire of creative, intelligent people to go into public service, and it diminishes our freedom in a hundred ways.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I watched Meet the Press every week.
Posted by: Longdream on Jun 13, 2008 3:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And he gave me a pain in the butt sometimes, but I'm going to miss Tim Russert a lot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Get to the salient issues
Posted by: deporres on Jun 15, 2008 7:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I would be far more interested in knowing how Senator Obama plan to help seniors with their social security being 100% taxable

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]