Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.
Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.
Geeks and Hackers, Uncle Sam's Cyber-Force Wants You!
Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
China Scrambles to Stave Off Economic Meltdown
Antoaneta Bezlova
Democracy and Elections:
Consensus Builds for Universal Voter Registration
Project Vote
DrugReporter:
The Prospects for Drug Reform in Obama's Washington
Phillip S. Smith
Election 2008:
Obama's Latino Mandate
Steve Cobble, Joe Velasquez
Environment:
Obama Promises "New Chapter" in Climate Leadership
Eoin O'Carroll
ForeignPolicy:
Arab Americans Should Be Worried About Rahm Emanuel
Remi Kanazi
Health and Wellness:
This Week in Health
Lindsay Beyerstein
Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman
Immigration:
Border Fence to Carve up Nature Reserve
Enrique Gili
Media and Technology:
Glenn Beck Wonders Why He's Resented as a Bigot
Steve Rendall
Movie Mix:
Honeytrap Lies and Women Spies
Rosie White
Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Where Are the Female Arnold Schwarzeneggers?
Marie Cocco
Rights and Liberties:
In Stunning Ruling, D.C. Judge Orders Release of Five Gitmo Prisoners
Sex and Relationships:
Don't Take Relationship Advice From Facebook
Amelia
War on Iraq:
Iraqis Pour into Street to Protest U.S. Security "Agreement"
Water:
The Tide Is Changing on Bottled Water
Wendy Williams
Recently, while I was on a visit to Salon.com, my computer screen momentarily went black. A glitch? A power surge? No, it was a pop-up ad for the U.S. Air Force, warning me that an enemy cyber-attack could come at any moment -- with dire consequences for my ability to connect to the internet. It was an "Outer Limits" moment. Remember that eerie sci-fi show from the early 1960s? The one that began in a blur with the message, "There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. ... " It felt a little like that.
And speaking of Air Force ads, there's one currently running on TV and on the internet that starts with a bird's-eye view of the Pentagon as a narrator intones, "This building will be attacked 3 million times today. Who's going to protect it?" Two Army colleagues of mine nearly died on Sept. 11, 2001, when the third hijacked plane crashed into the Pentagon, so I can't say I appreciated the none-too-subtle reminder of that day's carnage. Leaving that aside, it turns out that the ad is referring to cyber-attacks and that the cyber-protector it has in mind is a new breed of "air" warrior, part of an entirely new Cyber Command run by the Air Force. Using the latest technology, our cyber-elite will "shoot down" enemy hackers and saboteurs, both foreign and domestic, thereby dominating the realm of cyberspace, just as the Air Force is currently seeking to dominate the planet's air space -- and then space itself "to the shining stars and beyond."
Part of the Air Force's new "above all" vision of full-spectrum dominance, America's emerging cyber-force has control fantasies that would impress George Orwell. Working with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA), the Department of Homeland Security and other governmental agencies, the Air Force's stated goal is to gain access to, and control over, any and all networked computers, anywhere on Earth, at a proposed cost to you, the American taxpayer, of $30 billion over the first five years.
Here, the Air Force is advancing the now-familiar Bush-era idea that the only effective defense is a dominating offense. According to Lani Kass, previously the head of the Air Force's Cyberspace Task Force and now a special assistant to the Air Force chief of staff, "If you're defending in cyber(space), you're already too late. Cyber delivers on the original promise of air power. If you don't dominate in cyber, you cannot dominate in other domains."
Such logic is commonplace in today's Air Force (as it has been for Bush administration foreign policy). A threat is identified, our vulnerability to it is trumpeted, and then our response is to spend tens of billions of dollars launching a quest for total domination. Thus, on May 12 of this year, the Air Force Research Laboratory posted an official "request for proposal" seeking contractor bids to begin the push to achieve "dominant cyber offensive engagement." The desired capabilities constitute a disturbing militarization of cyberspace:
Of interest are any and all techniques to enable user and/or root access to both fixed (PC) or mobile computing platforms. Robust methodologies to enable access to any and all operating systems, patch levels, applications and hardware ... technology ... to maintain an active presence within the adversaries' information infrastructure completely undetected ... any and all techniques to enable stealth and persistence capabilities ... capability to stealthily exfiltrate information from any remotely located open or closed computer information systems ...
Stealthily infiltrating, stealing and exfiltrating: sounds like cyber-cat burglars, or perhaps invisible cyber-SEALS, as in that U.S. Navy "empty beach at night" commercial. This is consistent with an Air Force-sponsored concept paper on " network-centric warfare," which posits the deployment of so-called "cyber-craft" in cyberspace to "disable terminals, nodes or the entire network as well as send commands to 'fry' their hard drives." Somebody clever with acronyms came up with D5, an all-encompassing term that embraces the ability to deceive, deny, disrupt, degrade and destroy an enemy's computer information systems.
See more stories tagged with: internet, department of defense
William J. Astore, a retired Air Force lieutenant colonel, now teaches at the Pennsylvania College of Technology. His books and articles focus primarily on military history and include "Hindenburg: Icon of German Militarism" (Potomac Press, 2005).
Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »