comments_image -

Making Good Climate Policy Profitable

Energy companies and environmental activists must learn to do well by doing good.
June 5, 2008  |  
 
Advertisement
 

Reality deniers are hard at work, with $100s of millions supporting them, arguing that doing something about global warming would be disastrous for the economy. Let us be clear: THIS IS FALSE! Smart climate policy will, even within traditional economic definitions, pay off for the economy. But, in fact, there are a multitude of payoffs here:

  • Insurance: Reducing emissions (even going to carbon negative) is an insurance policy against potential impacts of catastrophic climate change. There will be impacts but we have, hopefully, the chance to control how bad they will be.
  • Security: Reducing Global Warming impacts will improve national security (by reducing risks), but a key path will also mean reduced oil imports which might lead to lower global tensions and fewer drives for deployments of military forces into conflict situations.
  • Economics: Well, the economic payoffs are enormous, from reduced health care costs from lowered pollution, to improved balance of payments due to lowered oil imports and increased exports of green technologies, to green jobs, to …
  • As for the last, let’s take two great examples from the Sightline Institute that each highlight the payoff potential, along with innovative thoughts on how to accelerate and improve the payoffs.

    Riding Herd on Refrigerators: “Financing free fridges for fairness.”

    Refrigerators are a great poster child for energy efficiency and the value of standards. Average annual power use for refrigerators has fallen roughly by two-thirds over the past 20 years, meaning new refrigerators use about 1000 kilowatt hours less per year. For every 10 old refrigerators replaced, that is about the equivalent of taking a house off the grid. Hmmm … not bad.

    But, this bumps into the classic upfront capital versus long-term savings from efficiency challenge. One that is difficult for those lower on the economic spectrum to deal with and one counter to how our culture considers economic payoffs (individuals in their own lives), as we discount future savings too heavily.

    submit to reddit

    -
    Email
    Print
    Share
    LIKED THIS ARTICLE? JOIN OUR EMAIL LIST
    Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
    See more stories tagged with: energy, economy, environement
    Advertisement
    Most Read
    Most Emailed
    Most Discussed
    On REDDIT
    On DIGG
     
    loading most read content ..
    Advertisement
    6 Signs Conservative Rhetoric is Losing the Debate

    By Ryan Cooper | Washington Monthly Political Animal

     
     
    Prohibition, 2012: Senate Bans Fake Pot, 'Bath Salts', 2C-E in Amendment Added to FDA Safety and Innovation Act

    By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

     
     
    Appalachian Women Lead Dramatic Protest Against Mountaintop Removal: Interview With Marilyn Mullens

    By Jeff Biggers | AlterNet

     
     
    Amazon Communities Develop Innovative Water Solutions After Environmental Devastation

    By Tara Lohan | AlterNet

     
     
    Newark, NJ Mayor Cory Booker Calls Drug War a "Nightmare," Tweets About Racist Incarceration

    By Kristen Gwynne | AlterNet

     
     
    Breaking: Obama Campaign Stop at Factory Farm Propaganda Site, Billed as "Grassroots Event"

    By Dave Murphy | AlterNet

     
     
    Amazon.com Becomes 16th Corporation to Dump ALEC

    By Rebekah Wilce | PR Watch

     
     
    DNC Finally Helps Scott Walker Opponent Raise Money for Recall Election

    By Lauren Kelley | AlterNet

     
     
    OWS Librarians Sue Mayor Bloomberg, NYPD, and City of New York Over November 15 Middle-of-the-Night Raid

    By Lauren Kelley | AlterNet

     
     
    LA Becomes Nation's Largest City to Ban Plastic Bags; Also Requiring Fee for Paper Bags

    By Lauren Kelley | AlterNet

     
     
     
     
     
    loading ...
    POWERED BY DIGG'S USERS
     
    [ page served from web 1 ]