COMMENTS: 19
Fanning the Flames of Youth Civic Engagement
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
As we finish the final contests of the primaries, young people are excited about politics. According to PBS News Hour, 5.7 million people under the age of 30 voted in the primaries, a 109 percent increase from last presidential election. And before you write this enthusiasm off as merely a passing fad of Obama mania (he got 57 percent of the youth vote in Iowa, for example), look at recent history: In 2004, youth turnout in the general election rose by 4.3 million votes over the 2000 level, and hit the highest level in over a decade.
To be sure, many young people were profoundly disappointed by Bush's re-election (and for good reason, I might add), and a seed of serious cynicism has been planted by voting snafus so rampant in the last two elections (think Ohio and Florida). Some young people -- especially those without college educations or suburban upbringings -- are skeptical about whether their vote will really count. But this population has been especially moved by Obama's biography and "yes we can" spirit; the star of hip hopper will.i.am's wildly popular YouTube video has done especially well among young people of color and first-time voters.
The challenge ahead is to keep the excitement over the primaries alive until November, but what's more, make sure that civic engagement becomes an organic part of young people's frenetic lives from here on out. There are a few key ways that we can ensure this happens.
First, we need to create a culture of voting that mirrors the culture of volunteerism already so ingrained in young people's lives. According to the 2006 Harvard Youth Survey on Politics and Public Survey, 65 percent of youth don't define themselves as politically engaged but 51 percent of them attest to participating in community service.
Universities and religious institutions -- which have largely influenced the upsurge in community service among youth -- need to emphasize the virtue of getting involved in civic education organizations like Declare Yourself, Young People For, The Hip Hop Action Network, The League of Young Voters, Young Voters PAC, Generation Engage, and Rock the Vote.
Organizations like the Interfaith Youth Corps could start energizing those on the left to make civic education as integral to the spiritual experience as it has been on the right.
Second, we need to do everything in our power to make sure that votes count this November. The ACLU's Voting Rights Project and the Brennan Center of Justice's Blueprint on Reform are efforts already underway to make sure people are protected in the 2008 election. In addition, young people who are away at college need to be educated about the absentee ballot process well in advance of Election Day and all young people, who move far more frequently than older adults, should make sure they're registered with their local Board of Elections and know where they're supposed to vote when the time comes.
And finally, we need to continue to support outlets where young people are creating their own culture of political cool. Living Liberally, which hosts DrinkingLiberally, LaughingLiberally, ScreeningLiberally, and EatingLiberally, was founded by two young men interested in linking political identity and social interaction. The Roosevelt Institution, also founded by a young person, is the nation's first student think tank. Those younger than 18 are even catching the political fever by blogging about issues that are important to them at New School Politics and participating in mock elections in their high school civics classes.
Krystie got excited about politics through one such experience -- Laurel Girls State. Programs like it, which give high school aged girls a chance to participate in the democratic process over a weeklong camp, can be found throughout the nation (often sponsored by local American Legion Auxiliaries). Krystie remembers vividly how Secretary of State for Connecticut Susan Bysiewicz talked about why it was especially important for women to participate in politics. Krystie explains, "She encouraged us to really think about which party would protect women's interests the most effectively as we get the right to vote." Krystie, for one, is totally excited to exercise that right come November.
This article was originally posted by The Women's Media Center at www.womensmediacenter.com. The WMC is a non-profit organization founded by Jane Fonda, Gloria Steinem, and Robin Morgan, dedicated to making the female half of the world visible and powerful in the media.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on Jun 9, 2008 3:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So if Obama takes office and especially if he has the luxury of having his party control Congress as well, he will need to avoid the half-hearted approach that Clinton took throughout his tenure in the White House. I don't see young people being responsive to another president actively working against their ideals and interests.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If Obama's elected... then in 2010
Posted by: JibreelRiley
» Ah, political junk.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Ah, political junk.
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: If Obama's elected...
Posted by: jeffrey7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JibreelRiley on Jun 9, 2008 5:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've seen it here when the Children of the Corn gets mad at you when you point out the fact that Obama dose not plan on leaving Iraq, there will be no UHC, Gay Marriage: Nope. How about college cost or the fact that Colleges are sitting fat on there endowments but raising tuition at every chance they get. I dont know if the guy wants to expand the military or deplete it? What about gun control and abortion, well I dont think he would be pulling those evangelicals the press is lying about when the 527's kick off the soundbite "I dont want my children being punished with a baby."
The youth can cover there ears and go "lalalalalalalalalala" however the facts are out there and Sean Hannity is willing to point them out even when Newsweek is asleep at the wheel. Even the AlterNet has featured (little) but honest reporting about Sen Obama however even with that the kids will go "lalalalalalalalala" I dont here you so it comes down to the pure "coolness" factor. At the end maybe in 2008 the kids can learn the hard way that you are election a President of the United States not a High School Prom King. There might be "hope" due to the fact the rest of America can see the Democrat Party go off the radical crazy train.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Count the older voters too who are sick and tired of 28 years of empty "conservative" bullshit.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Learning the Hard Way
Posted by: jeffrey7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jun 9, 2008 7:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politicians have become fond of using the phrase 'We walk the walk and talk the talk'. Spoken this way it means 'We say one thing and do another'. If you do what you say you will it's called "Walking your Talk" These politicians do not Walk their Talk.
Mr Obama has already shit on the Bill of Rights with the incident around his church of the last 20 years. Instead of giving up his church membership he should have pulled out the Bill of Rights,hit the press in the face with it and tell them,'Even thouhg my pastor has his points of view,they don't always reflect mine,but I will defend to the end his right to speak as he feels whether I agree with him or not". This proves he's beholden to his handlers and NOT the Bill of Rights or The Constitution. His 'all uniteing speeches' could become just that,flowery speeches. He has good ideas,he has yet to walk them. His Senate voting record proves that out.
McCain,forget about it,he's so bought and paid for,it seeps out of every pore in his body.
Both support 'enhanced interogation' if it's getting results. Both are willing to use the power of force to secure American intrests,
i.e. big business, instead of using the Power of Peace to ensure security.
Pay close attention my young voter friends as to where both folks get their money from. Don't be fooled by fancy speeches,large crowds and rock band support. That does'nt mean he's a great candidate, that just means they have a great promotional machine and will buy the 'support' they want you to believe they have. Free show tickets means your vote is being bought. Well written speeches are just the work of well versed support staff that are designed to give a particular candidate the 'appearence' of being ideal. You must look deeper than the veneer that's put on a candidate. From my own experience I can tell you this....whomever wins they will be 'Walking the walk and Talking the talk'
This is proved out by the current inability to do anything by the sitting congress. So dig very deep,my young voting friends,the lives you save will be your Grandchildren's, and they will thank you for not getting fooled into voting for a slick image and good oratory.
Jeffrey7 P.O.T.Party Nominee for Prez '08
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HistArch on Jun 9, 2008 12:02 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well break the chain and vote OBAMA. That's right, vote for Obama. Old people (75-100) are afraid of their racist roots coming back to haunt them so they aren't gonna vote for Obama. Middle-aged people (Baby boomer sellouts) have been beaten into the dust by corporate media, commercialism, bills, and life in general to take a chance on him. They're also afraid to stop drinking the Kool Aid their doctors prescribed. So don't be like them. Vote now before the prescription meds and pesticides in your factory food destroy your imagination and inspiration for life. Vote Obama!!! Your country needs you and now is your chance. Obama '08! Remember, you have to live in this world after the other generations are gone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Old School's out, New School's in
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: The cold, dead hand of 1968
Posted by: westomoon
» RE: The cold, dead hand of 1968
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE:"Boomers", "X-ers", and on and on
Posted by: westomoon
» RE: Hold on there freind
Posted by: jeffrey7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: westomoon on Jun 9, 2008 2:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This "millennial generation" seems to me to be doin' just fine on their own. What older people can provide is money -- and maybe some tech assistance -- to help them do what they already want to do.
(grinning) Oh yes -- and a vote for Obama, of course...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Leadlip on Jun 9, 2008 4:52 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kirtap10 on Jun 9, 2008 9:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so bizarre to be objectified like this in a plan for social reform. I am a person before I am a young person. Just like this misguided author, I am trying to make the world a better place. If political organizing and voting seems to be a powerful way to change the world for the better, I will put my energy there. If I feel that I can make a large impact by volunteering and directly helping people in need, I will put my time and energy there. If I think all I can do is become the change I want, I will do that.
You will not meet anyone (not even a "young person") who needs to be convinced that we should strive to make the world better. You will find people have a variety of tactics for changing the world, all of them valid and valuable. There is no inherent value in civic engagement.
If people are excited about politics it is because they believe it can be a powerful tool for good. The continuation of this excitement will depend on whether or not they feel they were right.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joze46 on Jun 10, 2008 9:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ladies and gentlemen of America we all had no ideal of the impact to history and culture this new technology, plus far too many just gloss over the whole ideal, especially the Republicans. To match such a change in society Obama or the Republicans know that is a tough act to follow. Islam and Bush knew that too.
However, an incredible new wave of optimism flows in America because of the Clinton/ Gore legacy. To be sure they can understand the disguises in negative comments all recorded for history but now being closely observed. Mainstream Media across the spectrum is a key player in the catastrophe America now is enduring into a realization of a failed American experiment so far. The question is not weather the Media was negative towards Hillary Clinton. It should be how the media can be negative to anyone they choose using the shield of free speech. With the whopper topper to be able to use abuse and exploit the public domain electromagnetic spectrum all the while choking America for every nickel it can.
It was interesting to listen to Kucinich deliver thirty five counts of impeachment towards Bush in Congress yesterday. The very sad thing is nothing not one peep came across Mainstream Media.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Frank J. Burris on Jun 9, 2008 3:45 AM
Current rating: 3 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So if Obama takes office and especially if he has the luxury of having his party control Congress as well, he will need to avoid the half-hearted approach that Clinton took throughout his tenure in the White House. I don't see young people being responsive to another president actively working against their ideals and interests.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» If Obama's elected... then in 2010
Posted by: JibreelRiley
» Ah, political junk.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Ah, political junk.
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: If Obama's elected...
Posted by: jeffrey7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JibreelRiley on Jun 9, 2008 5:44 AM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I've seen it here when the Children of the Corn gets mad at you when you point out the fact that Obama dose not plan on leaving Iraq, there will be no UHC, Gay Marriage: Nope. How about college cost or the fact that Colleges are sitting fat on there endowments but raising tuition at every chance they get. I dont know if the guy wants to expand the military or deplete it? What about gun control and abortion, well I dont think he would be pulling those evangelicals the press is lying about when the 527's kick off the soundbite "I dont want my children being punished with a baby."
The youth can cover there ears and go "lalalalalalalalalala" however the facts are out there and Sean Hannity is willing to point them out even when Newsweek is asleep at the wheel. Even the AlterNet has featured (little) but honest reporting about Sen Obama however even with that the kids will go "lalalalalalalalala" I dont here you so it comes down to the pure "coolness" factor. At the end maybe in 2008 the kids can learn the hard way that you are election a President of the United States not a High School Prom King. There might be "hope" due to the fact the rest of America can see the Democrat Party go off the radical crazy train.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Count the older voters too who are sick and tired of 28 years of empty "conservative" bullshit.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Learning the Hard Way
Posted by: jeffrey7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jeffrey7 on Jun 9, 2008 7:55 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Politicians have become fond of using the phrase 'We walk the walk and talk the talk'. Spoken this way it means 'We say one thing and do another'. If you do what you say you will it's called "Walking your Talk" These politicians do not Walk their Talk.
Mr Obama has already shit on the Bill of Rights with the incident around his church of the last 20 years. Instead of giving up his church membership he should have pulled out the Bill of Rights,hit the press in the face with it and tell them,'Even thouhg my pastor has his points of view,they don't always reflect mine,but I will defend to the end his right to speak as he feels whether I agree with him or not". This proves he's beholden to his handlers and NOT the Bill of Rights or The Constitution. His 'all uniteing speeches' could become just that,flowery speeches. He has good ideas,he has yet to walk them. His Senate voting record proves that out.
McCain,forget about it,he's so bought and paid for,it seeps out of every pore in his body.
Both support 'enhanced interogation' if it's getting results. Both are willing to use the power of force to secure American intrests,
i.e. big business, instead of using the Power of Peace to ensure security.
Pay close attention my young voter friends as to where both folks get their money from. Don't be fooled by fancy speeches,large crowds and rock band support. That does'nt mean he's a great candidate, that just means they have a great promotional machine and will buy the 'support' they want you to believe they have. Free show tickets means your vote is being bought. Well written speeches are just the work of well versed support staff that are designed to give a particular candidate the 'appearence' of being ideal. You must look deeper than the veneer that's put on a candidate. From my own experience I can tell you this....whomever wins they will be 'Walking the walk and Talking the talk'
This is proved out by the current inability to do anything by the sitting congress. So dig very deep,my young voting friends,the lives you save will be your Grandchildren's, and they will thank you for not getting fooled into voting for a slick image and good oratory.
Jeffrey7 P.O.T.Party Nominee for Prez '08
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HistArch on Jun 9, 2008 12:02 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well break the chain and vote OBAMA. That's right, vote for Obama. Old people (75-100) are afraid of their racist roots coming back to haunt them so they aren't gonna vote for Obama. Middle-aged people (Baby boomer sellouts) have been beaten into the dust by corporate media, commercialism, bills, and life in general to take a chance on him. They're also afraid to stop drinking the Kool Aid their doctors prescribed. So don't be like them. Vote now before the prescription meds and pesticides in your factory food destroy your imagination and inspiration for life. Vote Obama!!! Your country needs you and now is your chance. Obama '08! Remember, you have to live in this world after the other generations are gone.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Old School's out, New School's in
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE: The cold, dead hand of 1968
Posted by: westomoon
» RE: The cold, dead hand of 1968
Posted by: EncinoM
» RE:"Boomers", "X-ers", and on and on
Posted by: westomoon
» RE: Hold on there freind
Posted by: jeffrey7
Comments are closed-
Posted by: westomoon on Jun 9, 2008 2:10 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This "millennial generation" seems to me to be doin' just fine on their own. What older people can provide is money -- and maybe some tech assistance -- to help them do what they already want to do.
(grinning) Oh yes -- and a vote for Obama, of course...
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Leadlip on Jun 9, 2008 4:52 PM
Current rating: 1 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Kirtap10 on Jun 9, 2008 9:11 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's so bizarre to be objectified like this in a plan for social reform. I am a person before I am a young person. Just like this misguided author, I am trying to make the world a better place. If political organizing and voting seems to be a powerful way to change the world for the better, I will put my energy there. If I feel that I can make a large impact by volunteering and directly helping people in need, I will put my time and energy there. If I think all I can do is become the change I want, I will do that.
You will not meet anyone (not even a "young person") who needs to be convinced that we should strive to make the world better. You will find people have a variety of tactics for changing the world, all of them valid and valuable. There is no inherent value in civic engagement.
If people are excited about politics it is because they believe it can be a powerful tool for good. The continuation of this excitement will depend on whether or not they feel they were right.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: joze46 on Jun 10, 2008 9:43 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Ladies and gentlemen of America we all had no ideal of the impact to history and culture this new technology, plus far too many just gloss over the whole ideal, especially the Republicans. To match such a change in society Obama or the Republicans know that is a tough act to follow. Islam and Bush knew that too.
However, an incredible new wave of optimism flows in America because of the Clinton/ Gore legacy. To be sure they can understand the disguises in negative comments all recorded for history but now being closely observed. Mainstream Media across the spectrum is a key player in the catastrophe America now is enduring into a realization of a failed American experiment so far. The question is not weather the Media was negative towards Hillary Clinton. It should be how the media can be negative to anyone they choose using the shield of free speech. With the whopper topper to be able to use abuse and exploit the public domain electromagnetic spectrum all the while choking America for every nickel it can.
It was interesting to listen to Kucinich deliver thirty five counts of impeachment towards Bush in Congress yesterday. The very sad thing is nothing not one peep came across Mainstream Media.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




