Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

All Indicators Point to a Softening of America's Harsh Marijuana Laws

By Alexander Zaitchik, AlterNet. Posted June 3, 2008.


With key medical marijuana ballot initiatives likely to pass, and a more pot-friendly majority in Congress, there is room for optimism.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

In Special Coverage

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Jim Hightower, Raising Hell
Jonathan Rowe

Democracy and Elections:
Are Feds Trying to Aid Republican Candidate's Election?
Tim Kalich

DrugReporter:
A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom
Lux

Election 2008:
The Real Elitist: Video of McCain's Collection of Mansions Reveal He's Not Your Average Joe
Steven Greenhouse

Environment:
Republicans Have Handed Democrats a Winning Election Issue
David Morris

ForeignPolicy:
Blocking a Gazan's Path to an Education
Fidaa Abed

Health and Wellness:
The Misshapen Mind: How the Brain's Haphazard Evolution Left Us with Self-Destructive Instincts
Sasha Abramsky

Hurricane Katrina:
From the Bayou to Baghdad: Mission Not Accomplished
Amy Goodman

Immigration:
Medical Neglect in Immigrant Prisons Reveals America at Its Worst
Kyle Hussein de Beausset

Media and Technology:
What's Going on with the Media's Ballooning Coverage of Celebrity Babies?
Meredith Blake

Movie Mix:
Protest over Use of the Word 'Retard' in Stiller's 'Tropic Thunder' Misses the Target
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Why Obama Should Pick Hillary
Lanny Davis

Rights and Liberties:
Stop the Execution: Jeff Wood Faces Death Tomorrow for a Murder He Didn't Commit
Liliana Segura

Sex and Relationships:
Catching the Wrong John: When Are the Media Going to Talk about John McCain's Infidelity?
Drew Westen

War on Iraq:
How Many More Iraqis Can You Throw Behind Bars Without Trial?
Fatih Abdulsalam

Water:
What If Your Tap Water Is Not Safe To Drink?
Elizabeth Royte

More stories by Alexander Zaitchik

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

You have to hand it to the Republican National Committee: Those guys really know how to pick the wrong fight.

John McCain, already running against the public opinion grain in support of the Iraq War and Bush tax cuts, received no help from headquarters last month when the RNC made medical marijuana a campaign issue. After Barack Obama told an Oregon weekly that he would end federal raids on medical marijuana users and providers in states with compassionate use laws, the RNC pounced. Obama's position, said an RNC statement, "reveals that (he) doesn't have the experience necessary to do the job of President (and) lacks the judgment to carry out the most basic functions of the Executive Branch." Because the Supreme Court has ruled that federal drug laws trump state drug laws, the RNC reasons that halting federal raids would be tantamount to ignoring the law.

They're right. But the RNC might want to get some new pollsters. What they and their candidates don't seem to realize is that a steadily shrinking minority of Americans oppose the controlled medicinal use of cannabis -- around 20 percent, according to the last Gallup poll. It's a safe bet that an even smaller number considers paramilitary raids on the homes of peaceful cancer patients to be a "basic function of the Executive Branch." During the New Hampshire primary, every Democratic candidate recognized this political reality by promising to end federal harassment of state-approved medical marijuana facilities and users. Republican candidates Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul pledged the same.

And John McCain? When pressed by activists from the group Granite Staters for Medical Marijuana, the Arizona senator responded in lockstep with most of his GOP peers, sounding less like a maverick than a Reagan-era after-school special. "I do not support the use of marijuana for medical purposes," McCain said. "I believe that marijuana is a gateway drug. That is my view, and that's the view of the federal drug czar and other experts."

Given current trend lines, it may not be long before it's possible to count McCain's "other experts" on two hands. In February, the 125,000-member American College of Physicians, the second-largest physicians group in the country, published a position paper endorsing the merits of medical marijuana and recommending the end of marijuana's classification as a Schedule 1 drug. "The ACP endorsement is massive," says Bruce Mirken of the Marijuana Policy Project, a Washington, D.C.-based lobbying group. "It blows to splinters the assertion that the medical community doesn't support medicinal cannabis."

As goes the ACP, so may go the American Medical Association, an endorsement from which would leave the anti-medical marijuana position of the Food and Drug Administration very lonely indeed.

To its credit, the country has not waited for the medical establishment before moving forward on marijuana policy reform. Over the last decade, support for compassionate use laws and broader decriminalization efforts has been growing, if not at weed's pace, then fast enough for one veteran marijuana reform lobbyist to now speak of being "within striking distance of a national tipping point."

Since California passed Proposition 215 legalizing medical marijuana in 1996, an average of one state per year has followed suit, some through ballot initiatives, others through legislation. Even in states that have yet to enact reform, a flurry of bills has been introduced. This activity hasn't been limited to usual-suspect states like Oregon and Vermont. Recent years have seen medical marijuana laws introduced in Ohio, Alabama, Missouri and Tennessee. In staunchly conservative South Carolina, it was a Republican state senator, whose wife lost a battle with brain cancer, who introduced his state's medical marijuana bill. In Texas, the state government last year passed a bill that is a halfway house for decriminalization, allowing police to issue citations instead of arresting adults who possess less than 4 ounces of marijuana.

The next big test on the horizon is the Midwestern swing state of Michigan, where voters in November will decide on a medical marijuana law, the first such statewide ballot initiative since South Dakotans narrowly rejected theirs in 2006. If passed, Michigan will be the only state with its geographical and electoral profile to pass a medical marijuana law. According to the Inside Michigan Politics newsletter, polls show two-thirds voter support. "Michigan looks set to become the 13th medical marijuana state this November," says Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project.

The other big initiative in November will appear on ballots in Massachusetts. If passed, the maximum penalty for possession of up to an ounce of marijuana in the Bay State would drop from up to six months in jail and a $500 fine to a $100 civil fine.

There is also still a chance that the New York state legislature will take up medical marijuana this session, a move that would enjoy overwhelming in-state support. Post-Giuliani New York City is the marijuana arrest capital of the world, with nearly 40,000 arrests in 2007 alone. The situation has gotten so out of hand that the New York Times recently urged Gov. David Paterson to take the lead in drug policy reform. Few governors are better positioned to do this than Paterson, who is not only on good terms with state Republican leaders, but has the moral authority that comes from suffering from glaucoma, a painful condition known to be alleviated by marijuana. Before becoming governor, Paterson was a leading activist for drug policy reform and was once arrested protesting the draconian and racially biased Rockefeller Drug Laws, which turn a brittle 35 this year. (Incidentally, the Drug Enforcement Agency is celebrating the same birthday in 2008, its website proudly declaring "35 Years of Excellence.")


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: medical marijuana, pot, ballot

Alexander Zaitchik is a freelance journalist.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Bull excrement!
Posted by: mizipi on Jun 3, 2008 1:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The DEA is a multi-billion year federal program that, IMHO, smuggles illegal drugs into the USA at a high profit margin for those who work for the DEA. To think that any agency in the federal government will give-up its money, power and profits is a dream. Our government is no longer logical - we torture, we start illegal wars. etc. Reefer will remain illegal no matter what the American public desires. The majority has no power in the USA today, but power is held in the hands of a few super-rich people who enjoy watching the rest of us live in a world that would drive Mr. Spock bonkers. Bill Clinton, which could have done a lot to end the War on Drugs, did nothing but allow the DEA to become even more powerful.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Bull excrement! Posted by: richholland
» All you want? Posted by: mizipi
If Only Lot Smoked Pot...
Posted by: HoboHomo on Jun 3, 2008 2:08 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
neither Sodom nor Gomorrah would have been blasted to smithereens. 'Cause their daughters ran off and got hitched with some local perverts (among the ones who banged on Lot's door so they could boink themselves into heaven).

What? Gay marriage AND cannabis ascend while everything else good descends into a dark, infernal pit of ChristoFascist terrorism? Light up a joint my dear fag readers, and celebrate like never before, because:

The world will soon be our quoyster!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Gateway drug?
Posted by: colinmeister on Jun 3, 2008 3:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So John McCain thinks giving cannabis to cancer patients is a gateway drug? In a way, I suppose he's right, since some sufferers' conditions will obviously worsen to the extent where they will need to be prescribed morphine and codeine to ease their suffering.

This seems to be the same crazy logic which caused the federal govenment to ban the use of heroin for treatment of terminally ill cancer patients, presumably to prevent the patients from becoming addicted to a drug during the last days of their lives. Better to suffer agony than addiction? I don't think so.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Gateway drug? Posted by: olympia43
» RE: Gateway drug? Posted by: solrev
» Gateway drug? NONSENSE Posted by: ssegallmd
cindy mcCain
Posted by: wittler youth on Jun 3, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
knows johns an a-hole..thats why she lives in l.a. and not with him..but shes flown on anoughf c.i.a. coke jets with him to know that power is money...she has the money/ he has the power..bring on the voter fraud!...what the guy said about the D.E.A. is true..in your dreams about even common sence change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

MARIJUANA USER
Posted by: billgee on Jun 3, 2008 5:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have been a USER for nearly 40 [40!] years.

I have definitely been plagued by all the fears of the DEA especially their fear of moving on to harder drugs. Though I used no drugs at the original Woodstock, I saw myself moving on to Acid in the 70s (Gov. Blacknegger beware) and many other drugs following that. {please note - the peyote I did in 70s in CA were really from New Mexico so the Good Gov can breathe easy}. Caffeine, Cocaine and Tobacco came much later so they cannot be blamed on a time or a place.

ALL I CAN SAY is not to do it. Youll end up drinking coffee & whiskey, smoking cigarettes and TAKING DRUGS right into your old age.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: MARIJUANA USER Posted by: xmvince
» RE: MARIJUANA USER Posted by: EJLima
» RE: MARIJUANA USER Posted by: osd
The best reference for decriminalization
Posted by: paulmagillsmith on Jun 3, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
talking points can be found at this link:

http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3381

As Woodward & Bernstein said, "Follow the money". Who benefits by keeping marijuana illegal? Isn't it the same people who benefitted from the failed experiment of alcohol prohibition? Politicians, gangsters, the police state, alcohol & tobacco interests, and corporate America involved in the drug industry or the prison industrial complex.

On the very practical side, since marijuana has been proven to be the best crop for production of biofuel material (besides algae), if our phobia of hemp were eliminated our national security would be enhanced by not having to kow-tow to foreign oil producers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh fucking great ! Another example of falling into the "pot" frame trap !
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 3, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
First off, ballot initiatives are USELESS. Just ask Jeb Bush and Arnold Schwarzeneggar. Governors and I believe the legislature too can render them useless as they wish. And marijuana-friendly Congress ? Are you fucking kidding me? Both parties are beholden to Big Oil and Ron Paul's push to make industrial HEMP completely legal and allow it into the markets so that the currently RIGGED markets dubbed "free" will actually get some competition pizazz is being killed AGAIN ! Oh, I'm so fucking sure Joe LIEberNAZI, John McSame, Diane FUCKstein, John DingDONGell (a nice Big Auto/Gun buddy), etc ... will let Cannabis have a chance. Most of Congress is in bed with Big Oil and a great deal of it with Big Tobacco. Besides, if you expect Congress to legalize anything of Cannabis, the first thing they need to do is ABOLISH THE FDA and DEA as neither one of those FRAUDULENT agencies have proven useful for the last 3 decades other than being a couple of approval puppets for Big Pharma and Tobacco.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hmmmm...
Posted by: GrannyBgood on Jun 3, 2008 6:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It sure would free up alot of JAIL SPACE for violent criminals and corrupt politicians !!

...But we wouldn't want THAT, would we?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» How very true! However... Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» RE: Hmmmm... Posted by: Lauren
If what I heard on NPR...
Posted by: Cybershaman on Jun 3, 2008 7:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this morning is true, people whose houses have been broken into by the police searching for small amounts of marajuana, will now be charged with federal gang laws. In other words you will be able to be charged with being in a gang for possessing small amounts. 7-10 years for that!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Its about time!
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Jun 3, 2008 7:38 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally we have some pot smokers in Congress. its about time somebody stepped up to the plate. A little pot never hurt anyone now did it?

JJ
http://www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Its about time! Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Its about time! Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Its about time! Posted by: Lauren
» Good one! Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Good one! Posted by: Lauren
changed laws don't change behavior
Posted by: linecrosser on Jun 3, 2008 7:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
1979 was the year Virginia passed medical marijuana laws, but you can't find a Dr. in the entire state to write the prescription, enforcement is at record high levels and penalties are above felony levels for a misdemeanor. Fines, for even less than a 1/4 ounce can run to three hundred dollars, and then one year of supervised probation, which require ten private secessions with a shrink, at $92.00 per hr. during the day and ten evening group secessions at $50.00 each and urine screens at $20.00 each, and you still have to report a probation officer weekly and take urine screen there also. The seven cities that make up what's known as Hampton Roads or Tidewater compete for the worst drug problem. On a tip from a CI about a marijuana growing operation in a back yard shed, the Chesapeake police conducted a three day investigation which consisted of driving by the house four times, then served a search warrant at night where they knocked for fourteen seconds then lost control of the battering ram and punched out a panel of the door with the ram ending up in the living room. The lone sleeping occupant not realizing what was happening,shot through the new hole in his door. The worst happened and a officer was killed. Soon as he became aware that it was the police that woke him by crashing through his door, he surrendered. The search found some lamps in the shed, that were in a pile in the corner and nothing else to indicate a active growing operation. They also found less than a joint in the house. The state has brought in special prosecutors, and judges to push capital murder charges and have dropped the marijuana charges in favor of tougher weapons charges. The police chief resigned during a independent study of the force and now Ryan Fredricks in facing the death penalty. The police and judges in this era violated his forth amendment rights and meet his second amendment right. The war on drugs in a state where Medical Marijuana is legal claims two more victims in the failed war on drugs, that has lasted longer than Vietnam. I have less than two months before I get off probation and then I'm leaving this common wealth and moving back to America. Which is anywhere out side the Virginia state line. I consider my self to be a good citizen and have paid a high price for it. I lost my left ACL when giving foot pursuit of a 7-11 robber who assaulted and broke away from the responding officer. I still managed to catch him. I stepped between a rapist and his victim and being half my age and eight inches taller he picked me up above his head and slammed me to the ground, driving my left shoulder to my hip outside of my rib cage. The Dr. said finding and removing the bones from my original shoulder was the hardest part of the joint replacement surgery. It was when the physical therapy wasn't working that they discovered the never damage, cancelled my therapy and told me I'd never use my arm again. Since I could still walk and talk I was denied disability and giving a minimum wage job for a tow truck company as a dispatcher. For three years I continued to exercise my arm and gained about 80% range of motion and 50% strength. I moved up in the company and became a inspector for zoning code violation as it pertains to vehicles parked on private property. I was very good and found counterfeit inspection sticker to a level that the state police got involved and made over four thousand arrest before catching the counterfeiter. Damage from the shoulder injury spread to my neck over the years and pinched nerves that became life threatening and I had to quit work, and apply for public assistance. Three years later after losing my home and moving into my car, I was caught smoking a joint in my car before I was able to get a home with the back payment from social security, the judge asked if I had prescription, I said no and that's how I became painfully aware that medical marijuana laws don't work in a police state. God help us all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Good luck, Linecrosser Posted by: 2dogarage
Shock & awe-ful things: the export of ReichWing Kulture, Korruption & 'Kriminalized Vice'...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 3, 2008 8:26 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm of two minds about this apparent changeFront:
-Should Canadians be grateful?
-Should Canadians be worried?

The US ReichWing dumps MILLIONS of dollars into 'special interest groups' in Canada (as well as developing nations) to harmonize culture into a ReichWing malleable mess.

If its ugly & American, its funded:
-religious fundamentalism
-pro-Life fanaticism
-isolated LDS splinter group encampments of abused children
-pro-NRA
-corporate domination
-privatization of resources, government & social processes (i.e., healthcare privatization movement)

the ONE thing the ReichWing hates? is anybody who can do anything differently & be observed doing it without catching a beatdown. Thus, they shut down the Mexican Border so Americans can't recognize their own neighbours & their oppression ... & vilify Canadian culture as 'communist' & requiring 'modification' to an American norm

There is always some shill who thinks that selling out their own culture to a foreign overlord is the path to personal prosperity... thus we end up with conditions that undermine sovereignty & personal liberty

1. Marc Emery - going to jail in Canada for 5 years to APPEASE American interests. Going to jail for activities which are not jail time in Canada, but because Americans initiated transactions which were illegal in the US. Of course he took the deal. why? because it meant avoiding extradition to the hell hole of privatized prisons in the US

2. KBR is currently taking Canada's Civil Rights to our Supreme Court... to undermine **off hours activities** because APPARENTLY EMPLOYEES DON'T HAVE PRIVATE TIME if it could be argued their PRIVATE & OFF-HOURS TIME adversely effects their WORK TIME

GET ENOUGH SLEEP? One day, you could lose your job if you don't
KBR ❤ their employees, don't they? if they're a raped female they're bad press to be covered up, but if they're Canadians who have a private life & exercise their rights to privacy? they're a potential employee to be fired or threatened by HR

NYC's Staggering Arrest Rate for Pot Achieved By Police Deception

Yeah, no POTENTIAL FOR CORRUPTION THERE

The Thieves of Virtue: in a culture without the Will for a Right to Privacy, criminalizing VICE functionally aborts representative government really, VICE is contextual:
* gender
* ethnicity
* age
* race

all pay a part in morals. but VICE, should never be *criminalized*, especially in a nation where PRIVACY has been abolished

Who is PERFECT ENOUGH to represent THE PEOPLE or a populist reform when there is neither privacy nor the Will to preserve privacy in society?
Who stands *for the People* when Money & Power exert corrosive controls to extend their oppression & corruption?

Nobody is immune to *vice* as VICE is about how ONE PERSON privately & personally determines *how to enjoy their own body*
but you CAN be immune to ReichWingers criminalizing how you enjoy it! JUST SAY NO!

"shock & awe-ful thing"s: "Taking Liberties" & forced drugging of Non-Americans on US flights

BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Fork-tongued McCain
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 3, 2008 11:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Arizona senator was quoted as saying, "I do not support the use of marijuana for medical purposes."

Until, of course, the flip-flopping old fart gets cancer again and starts puking his guts out during chemotherapy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Fork-tongued McCain Posted by: xmvince
I hope so, but I am not convinced enforcement will change
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 3, 2008 1:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here in Colorado, the people of Denver voted to de-criminalize marijuana but that didn't matter because then the police would just arrest people for breaking STATE drug laws.

A similar story in California, which passed Proposition 215, but then federal drug agents made arrests anyways, saying that federal law trumped state law.

I think it will take a change in federal law, and the House and Senate are notoriously way more conservative than the public.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Nothing Will Change
Posted by: sofla100 on Jun 3, 2008 1:55 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing will change. The prison "industry," and police/security establishments have a vested interest in the illegality of marijuana. It's also a "useful tool" for the police to "crack heads" in less wealthy and minority neighborhoods, and therefore, an effective means of social control by the elite of American society. You can bet America's rich elite won't be giving that power up anytime soon. Finally, with our national politicians trying to outgun each other with the "get tough" rhetoric, not one of them, Obama included, can we really count on to do anything meaningful on reform.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

85
Posted by: uncleeddie on Jun 3, 2008 5:02 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When 85% or what they call drug users are pot smokers don't expect any softening. The prison industry is just won't accept it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Iam getting sick of politics, So hows everyones new crop growing?
Posted by: yale on Jun 3, 2008 7:14 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Mines doin pretty good, soon to be transplanted. My biggest threat is whitetail deer, they love it as much as I do, or maybe more. Tracks in the mud from a single deer I found once, when I lost about 7 or 8 plants told me this one deer ate about a half pound of weed in one night! Wow thats way more than I can eat, or smoke. Iam sure that deer goes back to that spot and looks for more whenever it gets a chance, I would. Oh well, maybe I'll bring a few out to that place again and plant them as a peace offering, and maybe they will leave my other areas alone.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Amen, Dboy Posted by: 2dogarage
don't hold your breath
Posted by: sicntired on Jun 3, 2008 9:06 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In Canada we had a bill before the house in 1973 that would have legalized marijuana.It was allowed to die on the agenda and was never heard from again.Now the US has dragged us kicking and screaming into the drug war.We now have a prime minister that really believes Bush talks to God and who wants mandatory minimum sentences for one pot plant.It would be too sweet if the US was first to legalize pot.I don't care who does it I just want this insanity to end ASAP.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Have you seen this video?
Posted by: JackMcGuirk on Jun 3, 2008 9:45 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This video is proof that cannabis is becoming legal (industrial cannabis became legal yesterday in Vermont!):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-WPhkkPkEM
Thank you Barry Cooper and Marc Emery!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks Jack Posted by: 2dogarage
Federal Drug Czar?
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 4, 2008 3:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...jeez where do we live, Russia or North America?

Just because the Cold war is over doesn't mean we can steal their Czars!

the whole republican lexicon is full of these disturbing twists of English...
flip-flops... thats a shoe isn't it?

Republicans have exacerbated their concept War "ON DRUGS"...
must/do these guys have to declare a war on everything?
They're so out of touch with reality that I must say as a political entity...
the diagnosis is Schizophrenia

they have made this WAR and rachetted it up to the point where the US incarcerates the most per capita then any other nation on the planet...

nice going guys... that sure won't win you votes now will it!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Federal Drug Czar? Posted by: Talon
» RE: Federal Drug Czar? Posted by: Lauren
Up in Smoke
Posted by: jmmartin on Jun 4, 2008 5:34 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
My God, Harry J. Anslinger must be turning in his grave. He was the first drug czar, only they didn't have that title then. Harry wrote up a report for the government full of fallacious and fictitious nonsense about "the weed with roots in Hell," and, unfortunately, that set U.S. policy toward boo for the past 75 years. Anslinger's "findings" inspired the campy "Reefer Madness," with it's "hooked" "victims" slobbering all over themselves, shaking violently (as if having the DT's), and other indicia of lunacy and paranoia, as if they were extras borrowed from "The Snake Pit."

As for lightening up, I'll believe it when I see it. Look at how the fed cracked down (you should pardon the expression) on the medicinal marijuana stores in San Francisco, and you get kind of skeptical. Drug enforcement should be a states' rights issue (i.e. none of the fed's business). And conservatives are supposed to be states' rights advocates. But when it comes to drugs or Florida elections, the Nine Nutty Professors can be awfully creepy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Up in Smoke Posted by: Lauren
only when???
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 9:15 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Prohibition of alcohol, took a constitutional amendment and a vote of the people, to enact it, and to abolish it!!! The war against drugs, was never offered up for a vote of the people, nor any constitutional amendments adopted!!!All it took war one gangster official, to put something else on the black market to replace alcohol!!! Marijuana/ drugs will never become legal, until something else becomes outlawed to replace it on the black market!!! Our post J.F.K. government, has been waging a (pro-pagan-da)propaganda war against smoking tobacco since 1964, to create enough fear and hatred to generate a new, and improved prohibition!!! How fast could they fill up their prisons, by outlawing the most addictive substance on earth??? The war against caffeine is off to a slow start, but yes even the Pepsi generation, will get their turn at tax generated slavery!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: only when??? Posted by: Lauren
ONE AMERICA
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 9:29 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Medical marijuana is not the beginning of the end for the war against drugs!!! It will only give power from one set of gangsters to another set of gangsters, and create another faction, of the special privileged!!! Liberty and justice for ALL, or for NOONE at all!!! EQUAL RIGHTS, means NO privilege class, and NO persecuted class, just ONE class---AMERICANS!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RECAPPING AMERICAS MORAL WARS
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 11:09 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The U.S.constitution, gives us freedom of religion, however certain religions behave as if that only meant their religion, for only they are the chosen, everyone else is less than human!!! The civil war was over moral/ economic issues i.e. slavery. The Catholic NORTH, was against slavery!!! The Baptist SOUTH(the church of England) was still for class distinction, and the expansion of slavery, same as the morality of the mother land!!! The opium wars, was also a moral/ economic issue!!! The temper-est movement was born (out of the church of England), out of the need, of moral, and economic superiority, over those less than human, (driven by fear and propaganda) i.e. china-men!!! Prohibition of alcohol, was generated by the temper-est movement, driven by fear, hatred, and propaganda, aimed against German Americans, emanating from wwi!!! The war against drugs, orchestrated by the moral majority, against Blacks, and Hispanics, with the invention of "yellow journalism" perpetrated by the moral dictates of WM. Randolph Hearst, and Joseph Pulitzer, with sensationalism, lies, slander and propaganda, for moral and economical superiority!!! the same with the war against gays, smokers, nudists, hippies, fatties...All in the name of religion, and morals!!! All for economic and moral superiority!!! IT'S TIME TO GAIN FREEDOM FROM RELIGION, BIGOTRY, DIVISION!!! END TERRORISM: VOTE THEM ALL OUT!!! RELIGION, IS THE OPPOSITE, OF FREEDOM, i.e.= SLAVERY

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Never
Posted by: oldertoker on Jun 7, 2008 3:10 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As long as "big money" can be made, marijuana will never be legalized!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Washington attitude
Posted by: Lauren on Jun 7, 2008 8:08 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"The movement on this issue in 2008 is going to be almost nonexistent because politicians are focused on the election," says Alex Coolman, a former attorney with the Drug Policy Alliance and author of the Drug Law Blog. "Nobody in Washington wants to do anything that could be perceived as controversial."

It is in his interest for nothing to happen.

He is also dead wrong about the timing, 180 degrees in the wrong direction on that one, election time is the BEST time to exert political leverage. That is why they keep telling us the opposite.

All those congresspersons who voted against us, need to be replaced. NOW is the time to figure out who the best choice replacement for each of them is across the board, and then put THOSE people in place in a new party of unity.

DPA is not interested in us winning, they are interested in keeping us fighting forever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]