COMMENTS: 76
All Indicators Point to a Softening of America's Harsh Marijuana Laws
Sign up to stay up to date on the latest headlines via email.
John McCain, already running against the public opinion grain in support of the Iraq War and Bush tax cuts, received no help from headquarters last month when the RNC made medical marijuana a campaign issue. After Barack Obama told an Oregon weekly that he would end federal raids on medical marijuana users and providers in states with compassionate use laws, the RNC pounced. Obama's position, said an RNC statement, "reveals that (he) doesn't have the experience necessary to do the job of President (and) lacks the judgment to carry out the most basic functions of the Executive Branch." Because the Supreme Court has ruled that federal drug laws trump state drug laws, the RNC reasons that halting federal raids would be tantamount to ignoring the law.
They're right. But the RNC might want to get some new pollsters. What they and their candidates don't seem to realize is that a steadily shrinking minority of Americans oppose the controlled medicinal use of cannabis -- around 20 percent, according to the last Gallup poll. It's a safe bet that an even smaller number considers paramilitary raids on the homes of peaceful cancer patients to be a "basic function of the Executive Branch." During the New Hampshire primary, every Democratic candidate recognized this political reality by promising to end federal harassment of state-approved medical marijuana facilities and users. Republican candidates Tom Tancredo and Ron Paul pledged the same.
And John McCain? When pressed by activists from the group Granite Staters for Medical Marijuana, the Arizona senator responded in lockstep with most of his GOP peers, sounding less like a maverick than a Reagan-era after-school special. "I do not support the use of marijuana for medical purposes," McCain said. "I believe that marijuana is a gateway drug. That is my view, and that's the view of the federal drug czar and other experts."
Given current trend lines, it may not be long before it's possible to count McCain's "other experts" on two hands. In February, the 125,000-member American College of Physicians, the second-largest physicians group in the country, published a position paper endorsing the merits of medical marijuana and recommending the end of marijuana's classification as a Schedule 1 drug. "The ACP endorsement is massive," says Bruce Mirken of the Marijuana Policy Project, a Washington, D.C.-based lobbying group. "It blows to splinters the assertion that the medical community doesn't support medicinal cannabis."
As goes the ACP, so may go the American Medical Association, an endorsement from which would leave the anti-medical marijuana position of the Food and Drug Administration very lonely indeed.
To its credit, the country has not waited for the medical establishment before moving forward on marijuana policy reform. Over the last decade, support for compassionate use laws and broader decriminalization efforts has been growing, if not at weed's pace, then fast enough for one veteran marijuana reform lobbyist to now speak of being "within striking distance of a national tipping point."
Since California passed Proposition 215 legalizing medical marijuana in 1996, an average of one state per year has followed suit, some through ballot initiatives, others through legislation. Even in states that have yet to enact reform, a flurry of bills has been introduced. This activity hasn't been limited to usual-suspect states like Oregon and Vermont. Recent years have seen medical marijuana laws introduced in Ohio, Alabama, Missouri and Tennessee. In staunchly conservative South Carolina, it was a Republican state senator, whose wife lost a battle with brain cancer, who introduced his state's medical marijuana bill. In Texas, the state government last year passed a bill that is a halfway house for decriminalization, allowing police to issue citations instead of arresting adults who possess less than 4 ounces of marijuana.
The next big test on the horizon is the Midwestern swing state of Michigan, where voters in November will decide on a medical marijuana law, the first such statewide ballot initiative since South Dakotans narrowly rejected theirs in 2006. If passed, Michigan will be the only state with its geographical and electoral profile to pass a medical marijuana law. According to the Inside Michigan Politics newsletter, polls show two-thirds voter support. "Michigan looks set to become the 13th medical marijuana state this November," says Rob Kampia, executive director of the Marijuana Policy Project.
The other big initiative in November will appear on ballots in Massachusetts. If passed, the maximum penalty for possession of up to an ounce of marijuana in the Bay State would drop from up to six months in jail and a $500 fine to a $100 civil fine.
There is also still a chance that the New York state legislature will take up medical marijuana this session, a move that would enjoy overwhelming in-state support. Post-Giuliani New York City is the marijuana arrest capital of the world, with nearly 40,000 arrests in 2007 alone. The situation has gotten so out of hand that the New York Times recently urged Gov. David Paterson to take the lead in drug policy reform. Few governors are better positioned to do this than Paterson, who is not only on good terms with state Republican leaders, but has the moral authority that comes from suffering from glaucoma, a painful condition known to be alleviated by marijuana. Before becoming governor, Paterson was a leading activist for drug policy reform and was once arrested protesting the draconian and racially biased Rockefeller Drug Laws, which turn a brittle 35 this year. (Incidentally, the Drug Enforcement Agency is celebrating the same birthday in 2008, its website proudly declaring "35 Years of Excellence.")
But whatever happens inside Michigan, Massachusetts and New York, the 2005 Supreme Court decision in Gonzales v. Raich still leaves marijuana users open to federal prosecution under the Controlled Substances Act. As highlighted by the RNC statement critical of Obama's pledge, this decision will continue to undermine state- and local-level reforms until Congress changes federal law. Although only 1 percent of marijuana cases are prosecuted at the federal level, DEA raids on patients, caregivers and providers have been on the rise in states that have passed medical marijuana laws. This is especially true of California and Oregon, where in many cases individual patients have been detained and terrorized. In Los Angeles, the DEA has begun threatening the owners of buildings used for medical marijuana activities with seizure of their property, a development the Los Angeles Times has called "a deplorable new bullying tactic." According to Mirken, "The DEA has become the single largest obstacle to effective regulation of (medical marijuana) establishments."
At the moment there are three bills in Congress that seek to put a stop to these raids and set a precedent for federal-level reform.
The young granddaddy of this legislation is the bipartisan Hinchey-Rohrabacher Amendment, which has been introduced every year since 2003. Essentially, the amendment would strip the Department of Justice of funds to prosecute medical marijuana cases in states that have medical marijuana laws on the books. Named after Rep. Maurice Hinchey, D-N.Y., and Rep. Dana Rohrabacher, R-Calif., the legislation wouldn't legalize marijuana at the federal level or prevent the feds from prosecuting medical marijuana use in states without medical marijuana laws. It would simply enforce respect for state marijuana laws. When first introduced in 2003, Hinchey-Rohrabacher received 152 votes. Last year, that number had risen to 165. Later this summer, Congress will tackle the amendment again when it votes on the Department of Justice Appropriations bill. Reform advocates hope the amendment will benefit from racking up endorsements from groups like the right-leaning Citizens Against Government Waste, which came out in favor of Hinchey-Rohrabacher as a way for Congress to "start sending a signal that its priorities are in order."
But every year so far has been a 10-yard fight, and its sponsors don't expect that to change this year. "This will continue to be a tough battle," says Jeff Lieberson, Hinchey's spokesperson. "Many politicians are still behind the voters on this issue." Other analysts also warn against high expectations, pointing out that the timing is especially unfavorable for drug policy reform at the federal level.
"The movement on this issue in 2008 is going to be almost nonexistent because politicians are focused on the election," says Alex Coolman, a former attorney with the Drug Policy Alliance and author of the Drug Law Blog. "Nobody in Washington wants to do anything that could be perceived as controversial."
In April, Hinchey-Rohrabacher was joined by two other marijuana policy reform bills, both co-sponsored by Barney Frank, D-Mass., and Ron Paul, R-Texas. HR5842, the Medical Marijuana Patient Protection Act, would deny the federal government the right to employ the Controlled Substances Act to intervene in states that have legalized medical marijuana; it would also remove marijuana from the list of Schedule 1 drugs. HR5843, meanwhile, known as the Personal Use of Marijuana by Responsible Adults Act, would effectively decriminalize possession of up to 1 ounce. "We're in the early stages here," says Frank spokesperson Peter Kovar. "Nothing like this ever comes quick."
But it may be coming more quickly than some people expect. "All the indicators are prompting in the right direction," says Kampia. "Every major new ballot initiative looks set to pass. Infrastructure is growing: email lists, organizations, allies -- it's across the board. Public opinion is moving steadily in favor of decriminalization. State laws are moving forward, and none are going backward. We're constantly picking up votes in the House. The 110th is the most supportive Congress we've ever had."
If the RNC keeps attacking Democrats on medical marijuana, the 111th will be that much better.
Stay up to date with the latest AlterNet headlines via email
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mizipi on Jun 3, 2008 1:45 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bull excrement!
Posted by: richholland
» All you want?
Posted by: mizipi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Jun 3, 2008 2:08 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What? Gay marriage AND cannabis ascend while everything else good descends into a dark, infernal pit of ChristoFascist terrorism? Light up a joint my dear fag readers, and celebrate like never before, because:
The world will soon be our quoyster!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: colinmeister on Jun 3, 2008 3:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This seems to be the same crazy logic which caused the federal govenment to ban the use of heroin for treatment of terminally ill cancer patients, presumably to prevent the patients from becoming addicted to a drug during the last days of their lives. Better to suffer agony than addiction? I don't think so.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: olympia43
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: solrev
» Gateway drug? NONSENSE
Posted by: LMNOP
» Gateway drug yes, because it is illegal
Posted by: jwg
» RE: Gateway drug yes, because it is illegal
Posted by: augustiswest
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wittler youth on Jun 3, 2008 4:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billgee on Jun 3, 2008 5:36 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have definitely been plagued by all the fears of the DEA especially their fear of moving on to harder drugs. Though I used no drugs at the original Woodstock, I saw myself moving on to Acid in the 70s (Gov. Blacknegger beware) and many other drugs following that. {please note - the peyote I did in 70s in CA were really from New Mexico so the Good Gov can breathe easy}. Caffeine, Cocaine and Tobacco came much later so they cannot be blamed on a time or a place.
ALL I CAN SAY is not to do it. Youll end up drinking coffee & whiskey, smoking cigarettes and TAKING DRUGS right into your old age.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I eat hemp cereal and I haven't had any problems.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: I eat hemp cereal and I haven't had any problems.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I eat hemp cereal and I haven't had any problems.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: MARIJUANA USER
Posted by: xmvince
» RE: MARIJUANA USER
Posted by: EJLima
» RE: MARIJUANA USER
Posted by: osd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: paulmagillsmith on Jun 3, 2008 5:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3381
As Woodward & Bernstein said, "Follow the money". Who benefits by keeping marijuana illegal? Isn't it the same people who benefitted from the failed experiment of alcohol prohibition? Politicians, gangsters, the police state, alcohol & tobacco interests, and corporate America involved in the drug industry or the prison industrial complex.
On the very practical side, since marijuana has been proven to be the best crop for production of biofuel material (besides algae), if our phobia of hemp were eliminated our national security would be enhanced by not having to kow-tow to foreign oil producers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The best reference for decriminalization
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 3, 2008 6:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh fucking great ! Another example of falling into the "pot" frame trap !
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GrannyBgood on Jun 3, 2008 6:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...But we wouldn't want THAT, would we?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:Who is this "we", Granny?! Have you a rat in your purse?!
Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» RE: Who is this "we", Granny?! Have you a rat in your purse?!
Posted by: Lauren
» How very true! However...
Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» RE: Hmmmm...
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cybershaman on Jun 3, 2008 7:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If what I heard on NPR...
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: If what I heard on NPR...
Posted by: osd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Jun 3, 2008 7:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JJ
http://www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Its about time!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Its about time!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Its about time!
Posted by: Lauren
» Good one!
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Good one!
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: linecrosser on Jun 3, 2008 7:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Linecrosser, this story needs to get out!!!
Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» RE: Linecrosser, this story needs to get out!!!
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Linecrosser, this story needs to get out!!!
Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» Good luck, Linecrosser
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 3, 2008 8:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-Should Canadians be grateful?
-Should Canadians be worried?
The US ReichWing dumps MILLIONS of dollars into 'special interest groups' in Canada (as well as developing nations) to harmonize culture into a ReichWing malleable mess.
If its ugly & American, its funded:
-religious fundamentalism
-pro-Life fanaticism
-isolated LDS splinter group encampments of abused children
-pro-NRA
-corporate domination
-privatization of resources, government & social processes (i.e., healthcare privatization movement)
the ONE thing the ReichWing hates? is anybody who can do anything differently & be observed doing it without catching a beatdown. Thus, they shut down the Mexican Border so Americans can't recognize their own neighbours & their oppression ... & vilify Canadian culture as 'communist' & requiring 'modification' to an American norm
There is always some shill who thinks that selling out their own culture to a foreign overlord is the path to personal prosperity... thus we end up with conditions that undermine sovereignty & personal liberty
1. Marc Emery - going to jail in Canada for 5 years to APPEASE American interests. Going to jail for activities which are not jail time in Canada, but because Americans initiated transactions which were illegal in the US. Of course he took the deal. why? because it meant avoiding extradition to the hell hole of privatized prisons in the US
2. KBR is currently taking Canada's Civil Rights to our Supreme Court... to undermine **off hours activities** because APPARENTLY EMPLOYEES DON'T HAVE PRIVATE TIME if it could be argued their PRIVATE & OFF-HOURS TIME adversely effects their WORK TIME
GET ENOUGH SLEEP? One day, you could lose your job if you don't
KBR ❤ their employees, don't they? if they're a raped female they're bad press to be covered up, but if they're Canadians who have a private life & exercise their rights to privacy? they're a potential employee to be fired or threatened by HR
NYC's Staggering Arrest Rate for Pot Achieved By Police Deception
Yeah, no POTENTIAL FOR CORRUPTION THERE
The Thieves of Virtue: in a culture without the Will for a Right to Privacy, criminalizing VICE functionally aborts representative government really, VICE is contextual:
* gender
* ethnicity
* age
* race
all pay a part in morals. but VICE, should never be *criminalized*, especially in a nation where PRIVACY has been abolished
Who is PERFECT ENOUGH to represent THE PEOPLE or a populist reform when there is neither privacy nor the Will to preserve privacy in society?
Who stands *for the People* when Money & Power exert corrosive controls to extend their oppression & corruption?
Nobody is immune to *vice* as VICE is about how ONE PERSON privately & personally determines *how to enjoy their own body*
but you CAN be immune to ReichWingers criminalizing how you enjoy it! JUST SAY NO!
"shock & awe-ful thing"s: "Taking Liberties" & forced drugging of Non-Americans on US flights
BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Shock & awe-ful things: the export of ReichWing Kulture, Korruption & 'Kriminalized Vice'...
Posted by: sicntired
» Blueberry Pick'n and Cate Blanchett
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 3, 2008 11:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until, of course, the flip-flopping old fart gets cancer again and starts puking his guts out during chemotherapy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fork-tongued McCain
Posted by: xmvince
» BigPharma's headlong rush for THC **pills**
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 3, 2008 1:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A similar story in California, which passed Proposition 215, but then federal drug agents made arrests anyways, saying that federal law trumped state law.
I think it will take a change in federal law, and the House and Senate are notoriously way more conservative than the public.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I hope so, but I am not convinced enforcement will change
Posted by: wishninja
» RE: I hope so, but I am not convinced enforcement will change
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sofla100 on Jun 3, 2008 1:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uncleeddie on Jun 3, 2008 5:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yale on Jun 3, 2008 7:14 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Iam getting sick of politics, So hows everyones new crop growing?
Posted by: 2dogarage
» Amen, Dboy
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Iam getting sick of politics, So hows everyones new crop growing?
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sicntired on Jun 3, 2008 9:06 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JackMcGuirk on Jun 3, 2008 9:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-WPhkkPkEM
Thank you Barry Cooper and Marc Emery!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thanks Jack
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 4, 2008 3:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just because the Cold war is over doesn't mean we can steal their Czars!
the whole republican lexicon is full of these disturbing twists of English...
flip-flops... thats a shoe isn't it?
Republicans have exacerbated their concept War "ON DRUGS"...
must/do these guys have to declare a war on everything?
They're so out of touch with reality that I must say as a political entity...
the diagnosis is Schizophrenia
they have made this WAR and rachetted it up to the point where the US incarcerates the most per capita then any other nation on the planet...
nice going guys... that sure won't win you votes now will it!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't get nuanced on us Bearzerker
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Federal Drug Czar?
Posted by: Talon
» RE: Federal Drug Czar?
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmmartin on Jun 4, 2008 5:34 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for lightening up, I'll believe it when I see it. Look at how the fed cracked down (you should pardon the expression) on the medicinal marijuana stores in San Francisco, and you get kind of skeptical. Drug enforcement should be a states' rights issue (i.e. none of the fed's business). And conservatives are supposed to be states' rights advocates. But when it comes to drugs or Florida elections, the Nine Nutty Professors can be awfully creepy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Up in Smoke
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 9:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: only when???
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 9:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 11:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: CAPPING AMERICAS MORAL WARS
Posted by: blind848
» RE: CAPPING AMERICAS MORAL WARS
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oldertoker on Jun 7, 2008 3:10 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lauren on Jun 7, 2008 8:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is in his interest for nothing to happen.
He is also dead wrong about the timing, 180 degrees in the wrong direction on that one, election time is the BEST time to exert political leverage. That is why they keep telling us the opposite.
All those congresspersons who voted against us, need to be replaced. NOW is the time to figure out who the best choice replacement for each of them is across the board, and then put THOSE people in place in a new party of unity.
DPA is not interested in us winning, they are interested in keeping us fighting forever.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: mizipi on Jun 3, 2008 1:45 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Bull excrement!
Posted by: richholland
» All you want?
Posted by: mizipi
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HoboHomo on Jun 3, 2008 2:08 AM
Current rating: 2 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What? Gay marriage AND cannabis ascend while everything else good descends into a dark, infernal pit of ChristoFascist terrorism? Light up a joint my dear fag readers, and celebrate like never before, because:
The world will soon be our quoyster!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: colinmeister on Jun 3, 2008 3:43 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This seems to be the same crazy logic which caused the federal govenment to ban the use of heroin for treatment of terminally ill cancer patients, presumably to prevent the patients from becoming addicted to a drug during the last days of their lives. Better to suffer agony than addiction? I don't think so.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: olympia43
» RE: Gateway drug?
Posted by: solrev
» Gateway drug? NONSENSE
Posted by: LMNOP
» Gateway drug yes, because it is illegal
Posted by: jwg
» RE: Gateway drug yes, because it is illegal
Posted by: augustiswest
Comments are closed-
Posted by: wittler youth on Jun 3, 2008 4:42 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: billgee on Jun 3, 2008 5:36 AM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have definitely been plagued by all the fears of the DEA especially their fear of moving on to harder drugs. Though I used no drugs at the original Woodstock, I saw myself moving on to Acid in the 70s (Gov. Blacknegger beware) and many other drugs following that. {please note - the peyote I did in 70s in CA were really from New Mexico so the Good Gov can breathe easy}. Caffeine, Cocaine and Tobacco came much later so they cannot be blamed on a time or a place.
ALL I CAN SAY is not to do it. Youll end up drinking coffee & whiskey, smoking cigarettes and TAKING DRUGS right into your old age.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» I eat hemp cereal and I haven't had any problems.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: I eat hemp cereal and I haven't had any problems.
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: I eat hemp cereal and I haven't had any problems.
Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: MARIJUANA USER
Posted by: xmvince
» RE: MARIJUANA USER
Posted by: EJLima
» RE: MARIJUANA USER
Posted by: osd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: paulmagillsmith on Jun 3, 2008 5:48 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://norml.org/index.cfm?Group_ID=3381
As Woodward & Bernstein said, "Follow the money". Who benefits by keeping marijuana illegal? Isn't it the same people who benefitted from the failed experiment of alcohol prohibition? Politicians, gangsters, the police state, alcohol & tobacco interests, and corporate America involved in the drug industry or the prison industrial complex.
On the very practical side, since marijuana has been proven to be the best crop for production of biofuel material (besides algae), if our phobia of hemp were eliminated our national security would be enhanced by not having to kow-tow to foreign oil producers.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: The best reference for decriminalization
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 3, 2008 6:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Oh fucking great ! Another example of falling into the "pot" frame trap !
Posted by: maxpayne
Comments are closed-
Posted by: GrannyBgood on Jun 3, 2008 6:20 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...But we wouldn't want THAT, would we?
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE:Who is this "we", Granny?! Have you a rat in your purse?!
Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» RE: Who is this "we", Granny?! Have you a rat in your purse?!
Posted by: Lauren
» How very true! However...
Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» RE: Hmmmm...
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Cybershaman on Jun 3, 2008 7:08 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: If what I heard on NPR...
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: If what I heard on NPR...
Posted by: osd
Comments are closed-
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Jun 3, 2008 7:38 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JJ
http://www.Ultimate-Anonymity.com
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Its about time!
Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Its about time!
Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Its about time!
Posted by: Lauren
» Good one!
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Good one!
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: linecrosser on Jun 3, 2008 7:50 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Linecrosser, this story needs to get out!!!
Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» RE: Linecrosser, this story needs to get out!!!
Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Linecrosser, this story needs to get out!!!
Posted by: Stoney 12+1
» Good luck, Linecrosser
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 3, 2008 8:26 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
-Should Canadians be grateful?
-Should Canadians be worried?
The US ReichWing dumps MILLIONS of dollars into 'special interest groups' in Canada (as well as developing nations) to harmonize culture into a ReichWing malleable mess.
If its ugly & American, its funded:
-religious fundamentalism
-pro-Life fanaticism
-isolated LDS splinter group encampments of abused children
-pro-NRA
-corporate domination
-privatization of resources, government & social processes (i.e., healthcare privatization movement)
the ONE thing the ReichWing hates? is anybody who can do anything differently & be observed doing it without catching a beatdown. Thus, they shut down the Mexican Border so Americans can't recognize their own neighbours & their oppression ... & vilify Canadian culture as 'communist' & requiring 'modification' to an American norm
There is always some shill who thinks that selling out their own culture to a foreign overlord is the path to personal prosperity... thus we end up with conditions that undermine sovereignty & personal liberty
1. Marc Emery - going to jail in Canada for 5 years to APPEASE American interests. Going to jail for activities which are not jail time in Canada, but because Americans initiated transactions which were illegal in the US. Of course he took the deal. why? because it meant avoiding extradition to the hell hole of privatized prisons in the US
2. KBR is currently taking Canada's Civil Rights to our Supreme Court... to undermine **off hours activities** because APPARENTLY EMPLOYEES DON'T HAVE PRIVATE TIME if it could be argued their PRIVATE & OFF-HOURS TIME adversely effects their WORK TIME
GET ENOUGH SLEEP? One day, you could lose your job if you don't
KBR ❤ their employees, don't they? if they're a raped female they're bad press to be covered up, but if they're Canadians who have a private life & exercise their rights to privacy? they're a potential employee to be fired or threatened by HR
NYC's Staggering Arrest Rate for Pot Achieved By Police Deception
Yeah, no POTENTIAL FOR CORRUPTION THERE
The Thieves of Virtue: in a culture without the Will for a Right to Privacy, criminalizing VICE functionally aborts representative government really, VICE is contextual:
* gender
* ethnicity
* age
* race
all pay a part in morals. but VICE, should never be *criminalized*, especially in a nation where PRIVACY has been abolished
Who is PERFECT ENOUGH to represent THE PEOPLE or a populist reform when there is neither privacy nor the Will to preserve privacy in society?
Who stands *for the People* when Money & Power exert corrosive controls to extend their oppression & corruption?
Nobody is immune to *vice* as VICE is about how ONE PERSON privately & personally determines *how to enjoy their own body*
but you CAN be immune to ReichWingers criminalizing how you enjoy it! JUST SAY NO!
"shock & awe-ful thing"s: "Taking Liberties" & forced drugging of Non-Americans on US flights
BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Shock & awe-ful things: the export of ReichWing Kulture, Korruption & 'Kriminalized Vice'...
Posted by: sicntired
» Blueberry Pick'n and Cate Blanchett
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 3, 2008 11:46 AM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Until, of course, the flip-flopping old fart gets cancer again and starts puking his guts out during chemotherapy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Fork-tongued McCain
Posted by: xmvince
» BigPharma's headlong rush for THC **pills**
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Comments are closed-
Posted by: fanny666 on Jun 3, 2008 1:07 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A similar story in California, which passed Proposition 215, but then federal drug agents made arrests anyways, saying that federal law trumped state law.
I think it will take a change in federal law, and the House and Senate are notoriously way more conservative than the public.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: I hope so, but I am not convinced enforcement will change
Posted by: wishninja
» RE: I hope so, but I am not convinced enforcement will change
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sofla100 on Jun 3, 2008 1:55 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: uncleeddie on Jun 3, 2008 5:02 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: yale on Jun 3, 2008 7:14 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Iam getting sick of politics, So hows everyones new crop growing?
Posted by: 2dogarage
» Amen, Dboy
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Iam getting sick of politics, So hows everyones new crop growing?
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: sicntired on Jun 3, 2008 9:06 PM
Current rating: 4 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: JackMcGuirk on Jun 3, 2008 9:45 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-WPhkkPkEM
Thank you Barry Cooper and Marc Emery!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Thanks Jack
Posted by: 2dogarage
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Bearzerker on Jun 4, 2008 3:48 AM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just because the Cold war is over doesn't mean we can steal their Czars!
the whole republican lexicon is full of these disturbing twists of English...
flip-flops... thats a shoe isn't it?
Republicans have exacerbated their concept War "ON DRUGS"...
must/do these guys have to declare a war on everything?
They're so out of touch with reality that I must say as a political entity...
the diagnosis is Schizophrenia
they have made this WAR and rachetted it up to the point where the US incarcerates the most per capita then any other nation on the planet...
nice going guys... that sure won't win you votes now will it!
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» Don't get nuanced on us Bearzerker
Posted by: 2dogarage
» RE: Federal Drug Czar?
Posted by: Talon
» RE: Federal Drug Czar?
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: jmmartin on Jun 4, 2008 5:34 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As for lightening up, I'll believe it when I see it. Look at how the fed cracked down (you should pardon the expression) on the medicinal marijuana stores in San Francisco, and you get kind of skeptical. Drug enforcement should be a states' rights issue (i.e. none of the fed's business). And conservatives are supposed to be states' rights advocates. But when it comes to drugs or Florida elections, the Nine Nutty Professors can be awfully creepy.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: Up in Smoke
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 9:15 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: only when???
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 9:29 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: chiefwanadubie on Jun 4, 2008 11:09 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
» RE: CAPPING AMERICAS MORAL WARS
Posted by: blind848
» RE: CAPPING AMERICAS MORAL WARS
Posted by: Lauren
Comments are closed-
Posted by: oldertoker on Jun 7, 2008 3:10 PM
Current rating: 5 [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Comments are closed-
Posted by: Lauren on Jun 7, 2008 8:08 PM
Current rating: Not yet rated [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is in his interest for nothing to happen.
He is also dead wrong about the timing, 180 degrees in the wrong direction on that one, election time is the BEST time to exert political leverage. That is why they keep telling us the opposite.
All those congresspersons who voted against us, need to be replaced. NOW is the time to figure out who the best choice replacement for each of them is across the board, and then put THOSE people in place in a new party of unity.
DPA is not interested in us winning, they are interested in keeping us fighting forever.
[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]
Vancouver's Games Will Be the Gayest Olympics Ever
Trial Begins for Activist Who Fought to Protect Federal Lands from Drilling -- Join the Protest
Starbucks' Cop-Out to Gun Nuts: Customers Served Coffee While Strapped




