Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

America's Democratic Collapse

By Chris Hedges, Truthdig. Posted June 3, 2008.


In a dramatic speech, Chris Hedges warns that the nation is on the verge of becoming a full-blown corporate state.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Atheists, It's Time to Stand Up to Jesus
Russell Blackford, Udo Schuklenk

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
As Foreclosure Nightmares Increase, Will More Homeowners Pay Off Their Bankers in Violence?
Scott Thill

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
Despite Censorship By Beef Magnate, Michael Pollan Spreads Message About the Real Price of Cheap Food

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Chris Hedges

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Note: Chris Hedges gave this keynote address on Wednesday, May 28, in Furman University's Younts Conference Center. The address was part of protests by faculty and students over the South Carolina college's decision to invite George W. Bush to give the May 31 commencement address.

When it was announced in May that Bush would deliver the commencement address, 222 students and faculty signed and posted on the school's Web site a statement titled "We Object." The statement cites the war in Iraq and the administration's "obstructing progress on reducing greenhouse gases while favoring billions in tax breaks and subsidies to oil companies that are earning record profits."

"We are ashamed of the actions of this administration. The war in Iraq has cost the lives of over 4,000 brave and honorable U.S. military personnel," the statement read. "Because we love this country and the ideals it stands for, we accept our civic responsibility to speak out against these actions that violate American values."


I used to live in a country called America. It was not a perfect country, God knows, especially if you were African American or Native American or of Japanese descent in World War II, or poor or gay or a woman or an immigrant, but it was a country I loved and honored. This country gave me hope that it could be better. It paid its workers wages that were envied around the world. It made sure these workers, thanks to labor unions and champions of the working class in the Democratic Party and the press, had health benefits and pensions. It offered good public education. It honored basic democratic values and held in regard the rule of law, including international law and respect for human rights. It had social programs from Head Start to welfare to Social Security to take care of the weakest among us, the mentally ill, the elderly and the destitute. It had a system of government that, however flawed, was dedicated to protecting the interests of its citizens. It offered the possibility of democratic change. It had a media that was diverse and endowed with the integrity to give a voice to all segments of society, including those beyond our borders, to impart to us unpleasant truths, to challenge the powerful, to explain ourselves to ourselves.

I am not blind to the imperfections of this America, or the failures to always meet these ideals at home and abroad. I spent 20 years of my life in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East and the Balkans as a foreign correspondent reporting in countries where crimes and injustices were committed in our name, whether during the Contra war in Nicaragua or the brutalization of the Palestinians by Israeli occupation forces. But there was much that was good and decent and honorable in our country. And there was hope.

The country I live in today uses the same words to describe itself, the same patriotic symbols and iconography, the same national myths, but only the shell remains. America, the country of my birth, the country that formed and shaped me, the country of my father, my father's father and his father's father, stretching back to the generations of my family that were here for the country's founding, is so diminished as to be nearly unrecognizable. I do not know if this America will return, even as I pray and work and strive for its return. The "consent of the governed" has become an empty phrase. Our textbooks on political science are obsolete. Our state, our nation, has been hijacked by oligarchs, corporations and a narrow, selfish political elite, a small and privileged group which governs on behalf of moneyed interests. We are undergoing, as John Ralston Saul wrote, "a coup d'etat in slow motion." We are being impoverished -- legally, economically, spiritually and politically. And unless we soon reverse this tide, unless we wrest the state away from corporate hands, we will be sucked into the dark and turbulent world of globalization where there are only masters and serfs, where the American dream will be no more than that -- a dream, where those who work hard for a living can no longer earn a decent wage to sustain themselves or their families, whether in sweatshops in China or the decaying rust belt of Ohio, where democratic dissent is condemned as treason and ruthlessly silenced.

I single out no party. The Democratic Party has been as guilty as the Republicans. It was Bill Clinton who led the Democratic Party to the corporate watering trough. Clinton argued that the party had to ditch labor unions, no longer a source of votes or power, as a political ally. Workers, he insisted, would vote Democratic anyway. They had no choice. It was better, he argued, to take corporate money. By the 1990s, the Democratic Party, under Clinton's leadership, had virtual fundraising parity with the Republicans. Today the Democrats get more. In political terms, it was a success. In moral terms, it was a betrayal.

The North American Free Trade Agreement was sold to the country by the Clinton White House as an opportunity to raise the incomes and prosperity of the citizens of the United States, Canada and Mexico. NAFTA would also, we were told, staunch Mexican immigration into the United States.

"There will be less illegal immigration because more Mexicans will be able to support their children by staying home," President Clinton said in the spring of 1993 as he was lobbying for the bill.

But NAFTA, which took effect in 1994, had the curious effect of reversing every one of Clinton's rosy predictions. Once the Mexican government lifted price supports on corn and beans for Mexican farmers, they had to compete against the huge agribusinesses in the United States. The Mexican farmers were swiftly bankrupted. At least 2 million Mexican farmers have been driven off their land since 1994. And guess where many of them went? This desperate flight of poor Mexicans into the United States is now being exacerbated by large-scale factory closures along the border as manufacturers pack up and leave Mexico for the cut-rate embrace of China's totalitarian capitalism. But we were assured that goods would be cheaper. Workers would be wealthier. Everyone would be happier. I am not sure how these contradictory things were supposed to happen, but in a sound-bite society, reality no longer matters. NAFTA was great if you were a corporation. It was a disaster if you were a worker.

Clinton's welfare reform bill, which was signed on Aug. 22, 1996, obliterated the nation's social safety net. It threw 6 million people, many of them single mothers, off the welfare rolls within three years. It dumped them onto the streets without child care, rent subsidies and continued Medicaid coverage. Families were plunged into crisis, struggling to survive on multiple jobs that paid $6 or $7 an hour, or less than $15,000 a year. But these were the lucky ones. In some states, half of those dropped from the welfare rolls could not find work. Clinton slashed Medicare by $115 billion over a five-year period and cut $25 billion in Medicaid funding. The booming and overcrowded prison system handled the influx of the poor, as well as our abandoned mentally ill. And today we stand in shame with 2.3 million of our citizens behind bars, most for nonviolent drug offenses. More than 1 in 100 adults in the United States is incarcerated, and 1 in 9 black men ages 20 to 34 is behind bars. The United States, with less than 5 percent of the global population, has almost 25 percent of the world's prisoners.

The growing desperation across the United States is unleashing not simply a recession -- we have been in a recession for some time now -- but the possibility of a depression unlike anything we have seen since the 1930s. This desperation has provided a pool of broken people willing to work for low wages and without unions or benefits. This is good news if you are a corporation. It is very bad news if you work for a living. For the bottom 90 percent of Americans, annual income has been on a slow, steady decline for three decades. The majority's income peaked at $33,000 in 1973. By 2005, according to New York Times reporter David Cay Johnston in his book "Free Lunch," it had fallen to a bit more than $29,000, this despite three decades of economic expansion. And where did that money go? Ask ExxonMobil, the biggest U.S. oil and gas company, which made a $10.9 billion profit in the first quarter of this year, leaving us to pay close to $4 a gallon to fill up our cars. Or better yet, ask Exxon Mobil Corp. Chief Executive Rex Tillerson, whose compensation rose nearly 18 percent to $21.7 million in 2007, when the oil company pulled in the largest profit ever for a U.S. company. His take-home pay package included $1.75 million in salary, a $3.36 million bonus and $16.1 million of stock and option awards, according to a company filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. He also received nearly $430,000 of other compensation, including $229,331 for personal security and $41,122 for use of the company aircraft. In addition to his pay package, Tillerson, 56, received more than $7.6 million from exercising options and stock awards during the year. Exxon Mobil earned $40.61 billion in 2007, up 3 percent from the previous year. But Tillerson's 2007 pay was not even the highest mark for the U.S. oil and gas industry. Occidental Petroleum Corp. CEO Ray Irani made $33.6 million, and Anadarko Petroleum Corp. chief James Hackett took in $26.7 million over the same period.

For each dollar earned in 2005, the top 10 percent got 48.5 cents. That was the top tenth's greatest share of the income pie, Johnston writes, since 1929, just before the Roaring '20s collapsed in the Great Depression. And within the top 10 percent, those who made more than $100,000, nearly all the gains went to the top tenth of 1 percent, people like Tillerson or Irani or Hackett, who made at least $1.7 million that year. And until we have real election reform, until we make it possible to run for national office without candidates kissing the rings of Tillersons, Iranis and Hacketts to get hundreds of millions of dollars, this rape of America will continue.

While the Democrats have been very bad, George W. Bush has been even worse. Let's set aside Iraq, the worst foreign policy blunder in American history. George Bush has also done more to dismantle our Constitution, ignore or revoke our statutes and reverse regulations that protected American citizens from corporate abuse than any other president in recent American history. The president, as the Boston Globe reported, has claimed the authority, through "signing statements," to disobey more than 750 laws enacted since he took office, asserting that he has the power to set aside any statute passed by Congress when it conflicts with his interpretation of the Constitution. Among the laws Bush said he can ignore are military rules and regulations, affirmative action provisions, requirements that Congress be told about immigration services problems, whistle-blower protections for nuclear regulatory officials, and safeguards against political interference in federally funded research. The Constitution is clear in assigning to Congress the power to write the laws and to the president a duty ''to take care that the laws be faithfully executed." George Bush, however, has repeatedly declared that he does not need to ''execute" a law he believes is unconstitutional. The Bush administration has gutted environmental, food and product safety, and workplace safety standards along with their enforcement. And this is why coal mines collapse, the housing bubble has blown up in our face, and we are sold lead-contaminated toys imported from China. Bush has done more than any president to hand our government directly over to corporations, which now get 40 percent of federal discretionary spending.

Over 800,000 jobs once handled by government employees have been outsourced to corporations, a move that has not only further empowered our shadow corporate government but helped destroy federal workforce unions. Everything from federal prisons, the management of regulatory and scientific reviews, the processing or denial of Freedom of Information requests, interrogating prisoners and running the world's largest mercenary army in Iraq has become corporate. And these corporations, in a perverse arrangement, make their money off the American citizen. Halliburton in 2003 was given a no-bid and non-compete $7 billion contract to repair Iraq's oil fields, as well as the power to oversee and control Iraq's entire oil production. This has now become $130 billion in contract awards to Halliburton. And flush with taxpayer dollars, what has Haliburton done? It has made sure only 36 of its 143 subsidiaries are incorporated in the United States and 107 subsidiaries (or 75 percent) are incorporated in 30 different countries. Halliburton is able through this arrangement to lower its tax liability on foreign income by establishing a "controlled foreign corporation" and subsidiaries inside low-tax, or no-tax, countries known as a "tax havens." They take our money. They squander it. And our corporate government not only funds them but protects them. Halliburton -- and Halliburton is just one example -- is the engine of our new, rogue corporate state, serviced by people like George Bush and Dick Cheney, once the company's CEO.

The disparity between our oligarchy and the working class has created a new global serfdom. Credit Suisse analysts estimates that the number of subprime foreclosures in the United States over the next two years will total 1,390,000 and that by the end of 2012, 12.7 percent of all residential borrowers in the United States will be forced out of their homes. The corporate state, which as an idea is an abstraction to many Americans, is very real when the pieces are carefully put together and linked to a system of corporate power that has made this poverty, the denial of our constitutional rights, and a state of permanent war inevitable. The assault on the American working class -- an assault that has devastated members of my own family -- is nearly complete. The U.S. economy has 3.2 million fewer jobs today than it did when George Bush took office, including 2.5 million fewer manufacturing jobs. In the past three years, nearly 1 in 5 U.S. workers was laid off. Among workers laid off from full-time work, roughly one-fourth were earning less than $40,000 annually. A total of 15 million U.S. workers are unemployed, underemployed, or too discouraged to job hunt, according to the Labor Department. There are whole sections of the United States which now resemble the developing world. There has been a Weimarization of the American working class. And the assault on the middle class is now under way. Anything that can be put on software -- from finance to architecture to engineering -- can and is being outsourced to workers in countries such as India or China who accept a fraction of the pay and work without benefits. And both the Republican and Democratic parties, beholden to corporations for money and power, allow this to happen.

Take a look at our government departments. Who runs the Defense Department? The Department of Interior? The Department of Agriculture? The Food and Drug Administration? Who runs the Department of Labor? Corporations. And in an election year where we are numbed by absurdities, we hear nothing about this subordinating of the American people to corporate power. The political debates, which have become popularity contests, are ridiculous and empty. They do not confront the real and advanced destruction of our democracy. They do not confront the takeover of our electoral processes.

We have watched over the past few decades the rise of a powerful web of interlocking corporate entities, a network of arrangements within subsectors, industries, or other partial jurisdictions to diminish and often abolish outside control and oversight. These corporations have neutralized national, state and judicial authority. They dominate, for example, a bloated and wasteful defense industry, which has become sacrosanct and beyond the reach of politicians, most of whom are left defending military projects in their districts, no matter how redundant, because they provide jobs. This has permitted a military-industrial complex, which contributes lavishly to political campaigns, to spread across the country with virtual impunity.

Defense-related spending for fiscal 2008 will exceed $1 trillion for the first time in history. The U.S. has become the largest single seller of arms and munitions on the planet. The defense budget for fiscal 2008 is the largest since the Second World War even as we have more than $400 billion in annual deficits. More than half of federal discretionary spending goes to defense. This will not end when Bush leaves office. And so we build Cold War relics like $3.4 billion submarines and stealth fighters to evade radar systems the Soviets never built and spend $ 8.9 billion on ICBM missile defense that will be useless in stopping a shipping container concealing a dirty bomb. The defense industry is able to monopolize the best scientific and research talent and squander the nation's resources and investment capital. These defense industries produce nothing that is useful for society or the national trade account. (Seymour) Melman, like President Eisenhower, saw the defense industry as viral, something that, as it grew, destroyed a healthy economy. And so we produce sophisticated fighter jets while Boeing is unable to finish its new commercial plane on schedule, and our automotive industry tanks. We sink money into research and development of weapons systems and starve technologies to fight against global warming and renewable energy. Universities are awash in defense-related cash and grants, and struggle to find money for environmental studies. This massive military spending, aided by this $3 trillion war, is hollowing us out from the inside. Our bridges and levees collapse, our schools decay, and our safety net is taken away.

The corporate state, begun under Ronald Reagan and pushed forward by every president since, has destroyed the public and private institutions that protected workers and safeguarded citizens. Only 7.8 percent of workers in the private sector are unionized. This is about the same percentage as in the early 1900s. There are 50 million Americans in real poverty and tens of millions of Americans in a category called "near poverty." Our health care system is broken. Eighteen thousand people die in this country, according to the Institute of Medicine, every year because they can't afford health care. That is six times the number of people who died in the 9/11 attacks, and these unnecessary deaths continue year after year. But we do not hear these stories of pain and dislocation. We are diverted by bread and circus. News reports do little more than report on trivia and celebrity gossip. The FCC, in an example of how far our standards have fallen, defines shows like Fox's celebrity gossip program "TMZ" and the Christian Broadcast Network's "700 Club" as "bona fide newscasts." The economist Charlotte Twight calls this vast corporate system of spectacle and democratic collapse "participatory fascism."

How did we get here? How did this happen? In a word, deregulation -- the systematic dismantling of the managed capitalism that was the hallmark of the American democratic state. Our political decline came about because of deregulation, the repeal of antitrust laws, and the radical transformation from a manufacturing economy to a capital economy. This understanding led Franklin Delano Roosevelt on April 29, 1938, to send a message to Congress titled "Recommendations to the Congress to Curb Monopolies and the Concentration of Economic Power." In it, he wrote:

The first truth is that the liberty of democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of power to a point where it becomes stronger than the democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is Fascism -- ownership of Government by an individual, by a group, or by any other controlling private power. The second truth is that the liberty of a democracy is not safe if its business system does not provide employment and produce and distribute goods in such a way to sustain an acceptable standard of living.
The rise of the corporate state has grave political consequences, as we saw in Italy and Germany in the early part of the 20th century. Antitrust laws not only regulate and control the marketplace, they serve as bulwarks to protect democracy. And now that they are gone, now that we have a state that is run by and on behalf of corporations, we must expect inevitable and perhaps terrifying political consequences.

I spent two years traveling the country to write a book on the Christian right called "American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America." In depressed former manufacturing towns from Ohio to Kentucky it was the same. There are tens of millions of Americans for whom the end of the world is no longer an abstraction. They have lost hope. Fear and instability has plunged the working class into personal and economic despair, and not surprisingly into the arms of the demagogues and charlatans of the radical Christian right who offer a belief in magic, miracles and the fiction of a utopian Christian nation. And unless we re-enfranchise these Americans back into the economy, unless we give them hope, our democracy is doomed.

As the pressure mounts, as this despair and desperation reaches into larger and larger segments of the American populace, the mechanisms of corporate and government control are being bolstered to prevent civil unrest and instability. It is not accidental that with the rise of the corporate state comes the rise of the security state. This is why the Bush White House has pushed through the Patriot Act (and its renewal), the suspension of habeas corpus, the practice of "extraordinary rendition," the warrantless wiretapping on American citizens and the refusal to ensure free and fair elections with verifiable ballot-counting. It is part of a package. It comes together. It is not about terrorism or national security. It is about control. It is about their control of us.

Sen. Frank Church, as chairman of the Select Committee on Intelligence in 1975, investigated the government's massive and highly secretive National Security Agency. He wrote:
"That capability at any time could be turned around on the American people and no American would have any privacy left, such is the capability to monitor everything. Telephone conversations, telegrams, it doesn't matter. There would be no place to hide. If this government ever became a tyranny, if a dictator ever took charge in this country, the technological capacity that the intelligence community has given the government could enable it to impose total tyranny, and there would be no way to fight back, because the most careful effort to combine together in resistance to the government, no matter how privately it was done, is within the reach of the government to know. Such is the capability of this technology. I don't want to see this country ever go across the bridge. I know the capability that is there to make tyranny total in America, and we must see to it that this agency and all agencies that possess this technology operate within the law and under proper supervision, so that we never cross over that abyss. That is the abyss from which there is no return."
When Sen. Church made this statement, the NSA was not authorized to spy on American citizens. Today it is.

... We are fed lie after lie to mask the destruction the corporate state has wrought in our lives. The consumer price index, for example, used by the government to measure inflation, has become meaningless. To keep the official inflation figures low, the government has been substituting basic products they once measured to check for inflation with ones that do not rise very much in price. This trick has kept the cost-of-living increases tied to the CPI artificially low. The disconnect between what we are told and what is actually true is worthy of the old East German state. The New York Times' consumer reporter, W.P. Dunleavy, wrote that her groceries now cost $587 a month, up from $400 a year earlier. This is a 40 percent increase. California economist John Williams, who runs an organization called Shadow Statistics, contends that if Washington still used the CPI measurements applied back in the 1970s, inflation would be in the 10 percent range. The advantage to the corporations is huge. A false inflation rate, one far lower than the real rate, keeps equitable interest payments on bank accounts and certificates of deposit down. It masks the deterioration of the American economy. The Potemkin statistics allow corporations and the corporate state to walk away from obligations tied to real adjustments for inflation. These statistics mean that less is paid out in Social Security and pensions. It has reduced the interest on the multitrillion-dollar debt. Corporations never have to pay real cost-of-living increases to their employees. The term "unemployment" has also been steadily redefined. This has rendered official data on employment worthless. In real terms, about 10 percent of the working population is unemployed, a figure that is, over the long run, unsustainable. The economy, despite the official statistics, is not growing. It is shrinking. And as the nation crumbles, we are awash with the terrible simplicity of false statistics. We confuse our emotional responses, carefully manipulated by advertisers, pundits, spin doctors, television hosts, political consultants and focus groups, with knowledge. It is how we elect presidents and those we send to Congress, how we make decisions, even decisions to go to war. It is how we view the world. Four media giants -- AOL-Time Warner, Viacom, Disney, and Rupert Murdoch's NewsGroup -- control nearly everything we read, see and hear. This growing disconnect with reality is the hallmark of a totalitarian state.
"Before they seize power and establish a world according to their doctrines," Hannah Arendt wrote, "totalitarian movements conjure up a lying world of consistency which is more adequate to the needs of the human mind than reality itself; in which, through sheer imagination, uprooted masses can feel at home and are spared the never-ending shocks which real life and real experiences deal to human beings and their expectations. The force possessed by totalitarian propaganda -- before the movements have the power to drop iron curtains to prevent anyone's disturbing, by the slightest reality, the gruesome quiet of an entirely imaginary world -- lies in its ability to shut the masses off from the real world."
So what do we do? Voting is not enough. If voting was that effective, to quote the activist Philip Berrigan, it would be illegal. And voting in an age when elections are stolen by rigged ballot machines and a stacked Supreme Court willing to overturn all legal precedent to make George Bush president, will not work. I am not saying do not vote. We should all vote. But that has to be the starting point if we want to reclaim America. We must lobby, organize and advocate for the dissolution of the World Trade Organization and NAFTA. The WTO and NAFTA have handcuffed workers and consumers and stymied our efforts to create clean environments. These agreements are beyond the control of our courts and have crippled our weakened regulatory agencies. The WTO forces our working class to compete with brutalized child and prison labor overseas, to be reduced to this level of slave labor or to go without meaningful work. We need to repeal the anti-worker Taft-Hartley law of 1947. The act obstructs the organization of unions. We need to transfer control of pension funds from management to workers. If these pension funds, worth trillions of dollars, were in the hands of workers, the working class would own a third of the New York Stock Exchange.

The working class has every right to be, to steal a line from Obama, bitter with liberal elites. I am bitter. I have seen what the loss of manufacturing jobs and the death of the labor movement did to my relatives in the former mill towns in Maine. Their story is the story of tens of millions of Americans who can no longer find a job that supports a family and provides basic benefits. Human beings are not commodities. They are not goods. They grieve and suffer and feel despair. They raise children and struggle to maintain communities. The growing class divide is not understood, despite the glibness of many in the media, by complicated sets of statistics or the absurd, utopian faith in unregulated globalization and complicated trade deals. It is understood in the eyes of a man or woman who is no longer making enough money to live with dignity and hope.

George Bush, who will be here on Saturday, has done more to shred, violate or absent the government from its obligations under domestic and international law. He has refused to sign the Kyoto Protocol, backed out of the Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, tried to kill the International Criminal Court, walked out on negotiations on chemical and biological weapons, and defied the Geneva Convention and human rights law. He has set up offshore penal colonies where we deny detainees basic rights and openly engage in torture. He launched an illegal war in Iraq based on fabricated evidence we now know had been discredited even before it was made public. And if we as citizens do not hold him accountable for these crimes, if we allow the Democratic majority in Congress to get away with its refusal to begin the process of impeachment, which appears likely, we will be complicit in the codification of a new world order, one that will have terrifying consequences. For a world without treaties, statutes and laws is a world where any nation, from a rogue nuclear state to a great imperial power, will be able to invoke its domestic laws to annul its obligations to others. This new order will undo five decades of international cooperation -- largely put in place by the United States -- destroy our own constitutional rights and thrust us into a Hobbesian nightmare. We are one, maybe two, terrorist attacks away from a police state. Time is running out.

We must not allow international laws and treaties -- ones that set minimum standards of behavior and provide a framework for competing social, political, economic and religious groups and interests to resolve differences -- to be discarded. The exercise of power without law is tyranny. And the consequences of George Bush's violation of the law, his creation of legal black holes that can swallow American citizens along with those outside our borders, run in a direct line from the White House to Abu Ghraib, Guantanamo and military brigs in cities such as Charleston. George Bush -- we now know from the leaked Downing Street memo -- fabricated a legal pretext for war. He decided to charge Saddam Hussein with the material breach of the resolution passed in the wake of the 1991 Gulf War. He had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was in breach of this resolution. And so he and his advisers manufactured reports of weapons of mass destruction and disseminated them to a frightened and manipulated press and public. In short, he lied. He lied to us and to the rest of the world. There are tens of thousands, perhaps a few hundred thousand people, who have been killed and maimed in a war that has no legal justification, a war waged in violation of international law, a war that under the post-Nuremberg laws is defined as "a criminal war of aggression."

We have blundered into nations we know little about. We are caught between bitter rivalries and competing ethnic groups and leaders we do not understand. We are trying to transplant a modern system of politics invented in Europe characterized, among other things, by the division of earth into independent secular states based on national citizenship in a land where the belief in a secular civil government is an alien creed. Iraq was a cesspool for the British when they occupied it in 1917. It will be a cesspool for us as well. We can either begin an orderly withdrawal or watch the mission collapse.

A rule-based world matters. The creation of international bodies and laws, the sanctity of our constitutional rights, have allowed us to stand pre-eminent as a nation -- one that seeks at its best to respect and defend the rule of law. If we demolish the fragile and delicate domestic and international order, if we permit George Bush to create a world where diplomacy, broad cooperation, democracy and law are worthless, if we allow these international and domestic legal safeguards to unravel, our moral and political authority will plummet. We will erode the possibility of cooperation between nation-states, including our closest allies. We will lose our country. And we will, in the end, see visited upon us the evils we visit on others. Read Antigone, when the king imposes his will without listening to those he rules or Thucydides' history. Read how Athens' expanding empire saw it become a tyrant abroad and then a tyrant at home. How the tyranny the Athenian leadership imposed on others it finally imposed on itself. This, Thucydides wrote, is what doomed Athenian democracy; Athens destroyed itself. For the primary instrument of tyranny and empire is war and war is a poison, a poison which at times we must ingest just as a cancer patient must ingest a poison to survive. But if we do not understand the poison of war -- if we do not understand how deadly that poison is -- it can kill us just as surely as the disease.

Hope, St. Augustine wrote, has two beautiful daughters. They are anger and courage. Anger at the way things are and the courage to see they do not remain the way they are. We stand at the verge of a massive economic dislocation, one forcing millions of families from their homes and into severe financial distress, one that threatens to rend the fabric of our society. We are waging a war that devours lives and capital, and that cannot ultimately be won. We are told we need to give up our rights to be safe, to be protected. In short, we are made afraid. We are told to hand over all that is best about our nation to those like George Bush and Dick Cheney, who seek to destroy our nation.

A state of fear only engenders cruelty -- cruelty, fear, insanity, and then paralysis. In the center of Dante's circle, the damned remained motionless. If we do not become angry, if we do not muster within us the courage, indeed the militancy, to challenge those in the Democratic and Republican parties who herd us toward the corporate state, we will have squandered our courage and our integrity when we need it most.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: corporations, democracy, united states

Chris Hedges, a Pulitzer prize-winning reporter, is a Senior Fellow at the Nation Institute. His latest book is Collateral Damage: America's War Against Iraqi Civilians.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
A Brilliant Speech ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Jun 3, 2008 12:28 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A speech that everyone should read. Chris Hedges has captured the destruction, destitution and duress that pervades the whole of our country. From the flailing economy, to our disappearing constitutional rights, to our neglect of the poor and the environment and to the very idea of government itself, Hedges enumerates America's sins of omission and commission with justified anger and the courage of a true patriot.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» FDR got the message long ago Posted by: citizenjoe
» It's too late for voting. Posted by: LMNOP
» The ghost of FDR Posted by: 2dogarage
» Excellent post 2dogarage Posted by: Democratic Socialist
» RE: A Brilliant Speech ... Posted by: Lauren
» RE: A Brilliant Speech ... Posted by: Lauren
» Chris Hedges for VP!! Posted by: jreal
» RE: A Brilliant Speech ... Posted by: LetsSaveDemocracy
» send this story to everyone Posted by: Krain61
» RE: A Brilliant Speech ... Posted by: pangea
This should have been the commencement speech...
Posted by: radiomorning on Jun 3, 2008 1:13 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
He touches on something puzzling that I have been hearing lately about how grateful we all need to be to the Clinton's for all the wonderful things they did for everyone in the 90's. When I hear that I always think "what exactly?"

He illustrates the real state of things, that as it stands today, there is no real choice. Clinton, Obama, McCain, whatever.

It is important not to lose sight of this fact as we go through this election process and all get sucked into the false, media-propagated storyline of these contests. If we watch CNN enough we start to imagine that this is the way things really are. Wolf would never lie to me... would he?

If a Dem wins the WH in November, everything will not suddenly be hunky-dory, because America is now owned by corporations, thanks in large part to Bill Clinton. Corporations like Hillary's former employer Wal-Mart, which have no conscience, no accountability, and no motivation but the bottom line. And guess who pays them to kill Iraqi's and listen to your phone calls? You do.

Chris hits the nail right on the head here. Something much bigger needs to happen.

And honestly, what douche booked Bush for the commencement address? I would seriously consider transfering out of that school after that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Clinton Posted by: paulaH
» RE: Clinton Posted by: Krain61
» RE: Why not? Posted by: oregoncharles
» RE: Why not? Posted by: radiomorning
NAFTA
Posted by: Dboy on Jun 3, 2008 2:41 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NAFTA was great if you were a corporation. It was a disaster if you were a worker.

What most people probably miss in this article is the implication of the above quote. If globalization is bad for workers and good for corporations...then stop being a worker! By that I mean stop holding on to the working slave mentality...you might keep a *job*, but use the income from that job to finance your own freedom (through gradual self-education|self-improvement, investment, creating a small business). Nobody is going to make you free. You have to create that state for yourself. And that's true regardless of what political structure you happen to be living in.

dboy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Shey
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: richholland
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: geographical outsider
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Self employment Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: Self employment Posted by: richholland
» RE: Self employment? Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Self employment Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Quit buying Chinese crap Posted by: richholland
» Better yet let start over Posted by: Krain61
» Freedom : Small Business? Posted by: Artkansas
» RE: Freedom : Small Business? Posted by: Richard House
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Joe
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Dboy
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: HelperMonkey
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Dboy
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: HelperMonkey
» RE: NAFTA Posted by: Dboy
Me Ranting
Posted by: meranting on Jun 3, 2008 2:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the verge? It's like going into the desert and telling people we're soon going to be out of water. I'm all for speaking out, illustrating why this is the case, how Eisenhower warned us of this 50 years ago, etc etc etc. But telling people we're on the verge might support the notion that we can still wait a minute before it's actually the case. It's now, it's here and GE, GM and all the others are running YOUR life (mine too of course, hehehe).

I blog here

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» stop waiting! Posted by: sirios
This may be
Posted by: Shey on Jun 3, 2008 3:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...... the single most brilliant and important article ever posted on AlterNet. I hope the length doesn't deter too many from reading it. It is actually, considering the amount of material it covers, marvelously succinct.

Kudos to Chris Hedges for reminding us of Bill Clinton's complicity in the ever escalating crumbling of our Democracy. Hopefully it will ring a warning bell for those still misguided enough to continue to support Hillary, because this is a two-headed beast if ever there was one.

As for Dubya, lets hope that enough courage and spirit of dissent remain alive on at least one college campus for the protesters (on paper) to walk the walk and boo the War-Criminal-in-Chief off the stage.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: This may be Posted by: Lauren
» RE: This may be Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: This may be Posted by: helenwheels
» RE: This may be Posted by: Lauren
This comment has been removed from the site due to non-compliance with AlterNet's community policies.
if mr.Hedges is right...
Posted by: richholland on Jun 3, 2008 3:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the working people of the USA have nothing to expect from mrs.Hillary Clinton.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: if mr.Hedges is right... Posted by: Last Chance
» Wrong! Posted by: WhuThe?!?
Tom from New York
Posted by: disc golf on Jun 3, 2008 3:57 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article by Chris Hedges was absolutely brilliant. It dovetails well with the recent book (The End of America) by Naomi Wolf which details how America is, in fact, becoming a fascist state. The reason so many don't notice this fact is that we've become complacent! We're used to the constant erosion of our personal freedoms! Well do NOT get used to this state of affairs!

Americans need to wake up and this article is as strong a reminder as I've seen! Let's take back America!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Tom from New York Posted by: Krain61
decline of American empire
Posted by: grmartin on Jun 3, 2008 4:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The USA has always been a corporate controlled state. If the economy and Iraq war were doing better, GWB wouldn't look so bad. Imperial America has passed its zenith and started its inevitable decline. Maybe, finally, people will start to examine the political structures that will no longer serve a diminished America.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Yup! Posted by: Dboy
oldfreedomdude
Posted by: oldfreedomdude on Jun 3, 2008 4:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A great editorial. Thank you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

reality bites
Posted by: seazen on Jun 3, 2008 4:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Here we have a terrific effort to focus thought, discussion, and purposeful action on some core issues that we all must deal with - now. While Mr. Hedges justifiable outrage may have caused him to declare every foreign trade arrangement and many domestic programs harmful by design - rather than badly distorted by the current defense/corporate cabal - everything he describe is real.

What we need to do is push the substance of this thesis forward and seek to mobilize the public and responsible organizations to work toward constructive solutions and ignore those who will take this and use it as fodder for more nonsensical screaming about current political parties or individuals.

The internet has demonstrated it can really generate widespread activity very quickly. It has also demonstrated that if we allow it to happen, those who simply get their jollies through yelling, name calling and misguided chest thumping can overwhelm the discussion so thoroughly that those seeking to learn, to seek solutions, to actually communicate with others give up in frustration.

It would be great if an article like this could become an example of how best to make some progress in our collective thinking.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: reality bites Posted by: Lauren
» RE: reality bites Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: reality bites Posted by: Lauren
» RE: reality bites Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: reality bites Posted by: Lauren
» RE: reality bites Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: reality bites Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: reality bites Posted by: Lauren
» We'd better take advantage Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» RE: We'd better take advantage Posted by: HoboHomo
WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES
Posted by: Plexius2 on Jun 3, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
At some point, this convergence of ugly realities will lead to a blowup in America. I keep thinking of the sixties riots, assasinations and near assasinations, bombings, and the creation of domestic armed freedom fighters (the Black Panthers and the Weathermen). I think about the tiny minority of extremely wealthy families in South America who must have armed bodyguards, and I noted for the first time ever in print, Chris's mention of a CEO whose company pays over $140,000 a year for security services for their head honcho.

What is in store for all those wealthy people when the Have Nots of America get fed up with poverty? Will we see a repeat of the Mansion family slaughter of wealthy Hollywood people? Will CEO's start having their families kidnapped for ransom?

And maybe most importantly, what will happen here if John McCain "wins" the presidency? I suspect that a lot of people are right on the borderline of losing it, and if McAnus manages to assume the mantle from Bush, you will see a repeat of the sixties times ten. Don't forget also that we have a growing crowd of Iraq vets who are coming back angry, mentally disturbed and dangerously well trained to kill. The destruction will be swift and vast. And if the rich in their gated communities with their bodyguards and panic rooms think they are safe, they need to think about how vulnerable Ronald Reagan was with the entire Secret Service to protect him. One mentally ill man living in his car with no organization backing him almost took out the president.

I fear that we are all looking at a very dangerous time if the Repugs manage to steal another election.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: Addwaita
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: ceraiteri
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: WE LIVE IN DANGEROUS TIMES Posted by: HoboHomo
There is no center
Posted by: Urstrly on Jun 3, 2008 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over the week-end, I had a conversation with a Clinton supporter, who described her as a centrist. I wish I had had Hedges' speech to give to her. If the Clintons are centrists, then ordinary Americans, myself included, are screwed. All those white working class voters Clinton claims are hers are the same ones her husband put out of work and whose unions he turned a cold shoulder to.

A third woman chimed in that she supported Hillary because she works in a corporation and she knows how tough you have to be to survive in that world. She had not considered that the next president Clinton might be tough on her as she left her corporate privileges behind.

I've known from the start I wouldn't support Senator Clinton, and I'm appreciative for Hedges to articulating why. I don't know how much better Obama will be, but at least he doesn't have the Clinton's baggage. And he's certainly miles ahead of McCain.

You can't just divide things down the middle any more; a deliberate path must be set. Either you want to save our way of life or you're willing to go numbly into where the current path leads.

It's up to people like us to keep saying long and loud that corporations are not the government, that their interests and the people's are rarely synonymous, that our Constitution and, indeed, our planet, are must be rescued.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There is no center Posted by: Southern Gal
» RE: There is no center Posted by: Dboy
Mr. Hedges article is eloquent, BUT
Posted by: Last Chance on Jun 3, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I couldn't find a reference to the corporations' basic tool for taking over the World and crushing democracy -- the population explosion that pits worker against worker in the competition for jobs and floods the Earth with billions of people who cannot possibly support themsleves except to cut down the last rainforests, or turn to gangsterism and hire themselves out to the same corporate criminals who created their Hell on Earth.

So, why did Mr. Hedges fail to mention this, and the obvious solution, which is to grant all women everywhere the legally protected right to decide if and when to birth how many or few children? Because given that right, the human population would decline so there would be no growing economy to create the huge profits for predatory corporations. No growing population = no growing economy = no criminal corporations = democracy for a smaller human population on a vibrantly healthy planet Earth!

Without this essential fact, Mr. Hedges article is nothing more than a swan song, a dirge for America's democratic past, because he offers no remedial action! Does he assume that a million people will march on Washington demanding justice and reform? Does he envision corrupt Congresspersons suddenly agreeing to impeach Bush and Cheney and arrest Rove and whoever else is involved in their treasonous conspiracy? So what if they did? What then? Business as usual under the Democratic Party for a slightly more liberal New World Order (?!) With a growing population and growing pollution the Earth would be just as diseased and all of us just as dead! -- How To Save The Earth

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A very good point... Posted by: Plexius2
» RE: A very good point... Posted by: Last Chance
» Just too many people! Posted by: KeepsonTickn
» You're right. Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: You're right. Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Just too many people! Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: Just too many people! Posted by: TagsNOLA
» RE: Just too many people! Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Just too many people! Posted by: Cybershaman
» Where I come from, we call Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» You Are Completely Right Posted by: bcgirl125
Only 222 students at Furman heard this speech?
Posted by: h bee on Jun 3, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and there are almost 650 in the graduating class...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» They were probably out Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» Shitty beer Posted by: Dboy
The Picture says it all
Posted by: modeler on Jun 3, 2008 5:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The new Adolf raised his arm in the old salute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Corruption
Posted by: US Citizen on Jun 3, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Just as it has happened in the past, it looks like the United States' corporate state will collapse under its own corruption. The housing industry has already collapsed, and with all the deregulation of the Bush administration, it won't be long before the United States' financial, retail, and industrial sectors will collapse, because of total corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Corruption Posted by: Last Chance
» Some Answers -- Posted by: Last Chance
» Change? Posted by: Dboy
HELLO ?!?!? America has already become a Korporatist state ever since RAYGUN took office in 1981 !
Posted by: maxpayne on Jun 3, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
28 years and this author still doesn't think America is already in ?!?!? I mean come FUCKING on ! Both parties have allowed Corporate America to RAPE this country and in the last 15 years the planet !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Oh for much longer than that, Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Oh for much longer than that, Posted by: Last Chance
» Dude? Posted by: bornxeyed
Supporting Democrats is a serious political disorder
Posted by: chlamor on Jun 3, 2008 6:04 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
like alcoholism or returning again & again to an abusive spouse who repeatedly lies to you. It's easy to fall off the wagon, to make excuses & rationalizations for it.

Even many whose views are developed enough to recognize such truths as the fundamental rottenness of the 2-party system & the complicity of Democrats in all of the Republicans' major crimes, are still unable to draw the logical consequences of these insights. (Those so naive that they still conceive of Democrats as being the "opponents" of Republicans are another case altogether.)

The central point is this: capitalist society permits the Democrats to be one of the 2 allowed parties for a very definite reason. It's not because the Democrats "serve the people." It's because in a subtle but effective way, they help the capitalists keep the populace under control by providing them with the illusion of possible change. TPTB don't want the people "served." They want them managed, or controlled.

It is the job, the central social function of the Democrats to always be dangling before the people's noses vague pseudo-hints of possible change, so as to keep them from bolting from bourgeois politics altogether. It is the Democrats' intention to never deliver meaningful change, but rather to keep dangling hints of it alluringly forever. This produces control -- a populace habituated to remain safely within the lines required by ruling class interests.

This is why the Democrats NEVER paint a picture of US history that's the slightest bit accurate -- they want a brainwashed population every bit as much as the Republicans do. This is why they NEVER are willing to set forth an honest socioeconomic analysis of why things are as they are -- they much prefer that people not understand such things.

As long as a large chunk of voters can be deceived by the seemingly "nicer guy" act of the Democrats, there is no hope whatever of coming to grips with the core problems of our society. The most dangerous trends -- a wasteful consumer society, environmental destruction, grotesque social inequality, and an uncontrollable propaganda/war machine -- cannot even be approached within the framework of bourgeois politics, because they all serve ruling class interests. This is what is really being protected, when people opt to support Democrats just because they seem less blatantly cruel on TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» This is the problem with discussing class. Posted by: andabottleof_rum
Be your own government
Posted by: PaulK on Jun 3, 2008 6:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Set up a wiki, label it "our government".

When you're small, devise a government.

When you're a bit larger with more hits, propose bills. Pass them.

The larger the wiki grows, the more moral power it has.

Moral power will start to translate into actual power: the cooperative's power to buy things in bulk, the validator organization's power to either approve or red-flag ideas, candidates or businesses.

The second part of "democracy is broken" is "so fix it". Problems need solutions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Be your own government Posted by: mamakat
» RE: Be your own government Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Be your own government Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Be your own government Posted by: HoboHomo
» Sorry, no URL right now Posted by: PaulK
We the People
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jun 3, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We the people are the only ones who are going to address our failing democracy. We have to be eternally vigilant and hold our elected officials accountable. The deck is stacked against us, but we must fight on. We must work for public financing of campaigns for the White House, Congress, and state and local elected offices. If elected president Obama will not change this corporate way of doing business without our insistence. We must constantly communicate with the White House and our Congressional respresentatives. We must hold the new president accountable to implement the changes we asked. Hope is not enough. It takes hard work and persistence to change things. Are we up to the task as our lives crumble around us?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: We the People Posted by: Lauren
» RE: We the People Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: We the People Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: We the People Posted by: Turiye
America 101
Posted by: s.duplantier on Jun 3, 2008 6:39 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This excellent speech is a short course in understanding how close the country is to the brink.

I am having a 1968 flashback! When pushed against the wall, you can give up or resist.

Maybe the pushing has been slow (pace, the slow motion fascism idea) and therefore the recognition of what is happening is slow. But when you finally realize it, survival means running, fighting back--anything but letting the thugs take you without a fight.

Think Warsaw Ghetto.

What will you do when the America's corporate version of the Waffen SS comes knocking? They are already on your street, walking toward your house.

It's past time to wake up, but how do you rouse an entire nation?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: America 101: Blackwater Posted by: GrannyBgood
» RE: America 101 Posted by: Lauren
exporting American domestic policies...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Jun 3, 2008 6:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm of two minds about this apparent changeFront:
-Should Canadians be grateful?
-Should Canadians be worried?

The US ReichWing dumps MILLIONS of dollars into 'special interest groups' in Canada (as well as developing nations) to harmonize culture into a ReichWing malleable mess.

If its ugly & American, its being funded:
-religious fundamentalism
-pro-Life fanaticism
-isolated LDS splinter group encampments of abused children
-pro-NRA fanaticism
-corporate domination
-privatization of resources, government & social processes (i.e., healthcare privatization movement)

the ONE thing the ReichWing hates? is anybody who can do anything differently & be observed doing it without catching a beatdown. Thus, they shut down the Mexican Border so Americans can't recognize their own neighbours & their oppression ... & vilify Canadian culture as 'communist' & requiring 'modification' to an American norm

There is always some shill who thinks that selling out their own culture to a foreign overlord is the path to personal prosperity... thus we end up with conditions that undermine sovereignty & personal liberty

1. Marc Emery - going to jail in Canada for 5 years to APPEASE American interests. Going to jail for activities which are not jail time in Canada, but because Americans initiated transactions which were illegal in the US. Of course he took the deal. why? because it meant avoiding extradition to the hell hole of privatized prisons in the US

2. KBR is currently taking Canada's Civil Rights to our Supreme Court... to undermine **off hours activities** because APPARENTLY EMPLOYEES DON'T HAVE PRIVATE TIME if it could be argued their PRIVATE & OFF-HOURS TIME adversely effects their WORK TIME

GET ENOUGH SLEEP? you could lose your job if you don't one day

Gee, KBR just loves their employees, don't they? if they're a raped female they're bad press to be covered up, but if they're Canadians who have a private life & exercise their rights to privacy? they're a potential employee to be fired or threatened by HR

NYC's Staggering Arrest Rate for Pot Achieved By Police Deception

Yeah, no POTENTIAL FOR CORRUPTION THERE

The Thieves of Virtue: in a culture without the Right to Privacy, criminalizing VICE by redefining morality functionally aborts representative government really, VICE is contextual:
* gender
* ethnicity
* age
* race

all pay a part in morals. but VICE, should never be *criminalized*, especially in a nation where PRIVACY has been abolished

Who is PERFECT ENOUGH to represent THE PEOPLE or a populist reform when there is neither privacy nor the Will to preserve privacy in society?
Who stands *for the People* when Money & Power exert corrosive controls to extend their oppression & corruption?

Nobody is immune to *vice* as VICE is about how ONE PERSON privately & personally determines *how to enjoy their own body*
but you CAN be immune to ReichWingers criminalizing how you enjoy it! JUST SAY NO!


BlueBerry Pick'n
ThisCanadian
┄┄
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Very...Very...Sorry...Obama
Posted by: Captainmagic on Jun 3, 2008 6:56 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
is bought and paid for and will no more change your landscape than Hillary could or Macain for that matter. It will only vary by small but largely painted, degrees (propaganda). You see Obama is the black man you have to have when you need the ultimate fall guy. Yes he will look OK but then there's the real stuff happening as you sleep. Just imagine if he should try and turn this behemouth around and actually work at ridding your country of the ills that afflict it so badly. He WILL have something in common with Martin Luther King,and at the end of the day, your nation will thrash around a bit, but hey, he was only a black man. You have the runs on the board and no one should consider anything other than this eventuality. Dead man walking. No ifs no buts if he tries to upset the status quo, he's gone and Hillary will be one of the dagger holders as well as the Macains of this, your reality world.

I said to the boys as the wall came down and the Russians realised (you didn't win any cold war)as the French and the British did so long ago you get to make a choice as to how you want to end up. You either continue down the festering slope or you get smart and pull your head in. The Russians withdrew to build for a better day but the Capitalist's in the repugs and demo's it seems will allow your ship to burn completely to the water line. We are watching with interest to see where your rats swim to.

George stood up on the deck and proclaimed victory (what an ass hole)and we said they just lost it. It won't matter who stands up after your election and claims victory. It matters not,.... as you have already lost.

If a structure is condemned you know what you have to do.

Tip of the week...Leave Iraq and leave it to the Iraqi's to rebuild so that you can leave all the other countries you infest and rebuild your own.

Captain OUT

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Very...Very...Sorry...Obama Posted by: Captainmagic
So, Chris too thinks we are becoming fascist. He's right
Posted by: citizenjoe on Jun 3, 2008 6:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Actually, fascism was always participatory. It was based on a politics of national superiority and the drive by a relatively unified citizenry to dominate other nation-states. What Chris is describing is New Fascism in which society is far more corporatized than in old European fascism. Fascists no longer need a Gastapo or to shut-down their parliaments to rule. They have far more powerful corporations behind them than those miserable creatures Hitler and Mussolini ever dreamed of. Fascism is first a foremost a system that drives for empire over nation-states and serves the needs of corporations, not citizens. That is what Chris describes so well.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Excellent pro-Republican piece
Posted by: Illiteratilumen on Jun 3, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This piece articulates many of the reasons why I am a Republican. We are not, have never been, and hopefully never will be living in a democracy. We used to have a fairly well functioning Constitutional Republic. The federal government has grown so large and powerful that it no longer has to answer to the will of the people. Our government now bends to the will of the business world and the elite. I believe that the best thing for this country at this time is to slay the beast we call the federal governement and return much of its power to state and local governments.

Interestingly enough there was this document written a long time ago that has a simple but eloquent plan for a limited federal government. What happened to it? Oh yeah a bunch of idiots thought that they had a better idea for what the federal government should be doing and we ended up with the disfunctional mess we have now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: It appears YOU are the idiot! Posted by: GrannyBgood
» If you want to start name-calling Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: If you want to start name-calling Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» RE: If you want to start name-calling Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: If you want to start name-calling Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» And being republican ... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: It appears YOU are the idiot! Posted by: andabottleof_rum
» RE: Your view supports the fascist creep Posted by: Illiteratilumen
» A question of definitions Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: A question of definitions Posted by: Cybershaman
» RE: A question of definitions Posted by: HoboHomo
» Can't read or think? Posted by: citizenjoe
» Illiteratilumen is right Posted by: tbone
Ralph Nader Philadelphia May 30 NO Democracy
Posted by: warble on Jun 3, 2008 7:14 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I attended a Nader Rally last Friday night and Ralph Nader proved to everyone that the will of the American people had been trumped by the corporations in the area of Health Care, Drugs, the war, corporate crime, Alternate Energy,and most everything that mattered to Americans. He proved beyond a shadow of doubt that the polls over and over stated where the people were on any of the issues and how congress had voted on all of those issues. In short, he proved that there was no democracy in America.

Nader also proposed ways that you, the people, could seize power from these crooks. He recommended that you form Watchdog Groups to in your cities, states, and congressional districts to monitor your representatives because they will take money from corporations and vote for them and leave you high and dry. If you are not the wiser, you end up paying for a $3 Trillion, Mortgage bailouts and all that other good stuff. According to Nader, you have to form these groups to keep these chumps honest.If you want more details, votenader, is how you get him at dot org. But, he recommended a way to make it right and you just cant let it all go down the drain.

In addition, he proved that the corporations had corrupted our congress and taken our vote and that congress is incapable of correcting itself. Additionally, he proved that he can't get on the election because of a series of unconstitutional laws which prohibits 3rd party candidates.

I am with Season, gmartin, max payne, chlamar and others who say "where have you been?" Amy Goodman proved last night that Barak is also selling us out.

Yes, Nader has 100 supporters to every million the Democrats or Republicans have but, he knows the score and if you just give him a chance, send him your money, he's the only person that will make it right.

We live in a sick country where the government kills iraqis indiscriminately and enslaves all of us. It was only yesterday they killed blacks and indians and mexicans and philipinos and chinese, and koreans etc etc. etc. all under the name of Freedom and Democracy. Tomorrow, it will be you. These corporations don't need you when they have outsourcing, and the rest of the poor suckers in Mexico, South America, India etc.

Wake up, everyone. You are being had. Send Ralph a donation before it is too late.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: WHERE was Ralphie Posted by: GrannyBgood
» RE: Here in PA Posted by: warble
» RE: aside about IRV. Posted by: kiatoa
» If only . . . Posted by: luckypuck
"ON THE VERGE"?!
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on Jun 3, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Where the hell has this guy been for the last fifty years? Hmmmmm.... now that I think of it, he's probably only twenty-five years old - which should tell us a lot about what's gone wrong with our republic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Sour Old Farts Posted by: GrannyBgood
» RE: "ON THE VERGE"?! Posted by: Lauren
Dictator Bush
Posted by: RedFoxOne on Jun 3, 2008 7:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, we have already become a Police State, so why not be a corporate state as well. Makes perfect sense to me.

JJ
http://www.Privacy-Center.net

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The socialist alternative to capitalist world wars, economic collapse
Posted by: jcrw on Jun 3, 2008 7:42 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As both Democratic and Republican parties are now corporate funded, they both support corporate agendas. Both Obama and Clinton support a continuation of the war in Iraq, both support corporate "for-profit" health care agendas. On many issues essential to corporate profit there has been, for many years, bi-partisan support. We essentially have a corporate political establishment party with two branches.

Read World Socialist Web Site for in-depth understanding from the international and socialist perspective of the Socialist Equality Party.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Late to the conversation...
Posted by: illistyn on Jun 3, 2008 7:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...but I thought it worthwhile to look up the FDR address he quotes. It's eerily on point, seventy years later.

Long, but worth it.

www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=15637&st=&st1=

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As I've said before
Posted by: sre on Jun 3, 2008 7:52 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Nothing's wrong children. Go back to sleep. Daddy Bush will protect you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As I've said before Posted by: Dboy
EXPLODING ELEPHANT
Posted by: edgeofnowhere on Jun 3, 2008 8:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Let's set aside Iraq, the worst foreign policy blunder in American history."

Let's also set aside the fact that somebody blew up three World Trade center buildings and blamed it on a rag tag band of Arab patsies. Heck, let's just set aside the fact we've been taken over in a coup and don't even know it. In fact, we don't even WANT to know it!

When they first began to ship the Polish Jews to concentration camps, the Nazi soldiers were scared to death that the huge numbers of unarmed Jews herded onto the railway station platform could easily turn on the handful of armed soldiers and overwhelm them. Not to worry. Human nature was on their side. If a mob of 5,000 persons faces an armed force of even 100, the first few bullets into the crowd is usually sufficient to disperse them -- usually.
There have been notable historical exceptions to this. Do the American people have the will -- the fortitude-- to overthrow the tyrants? I doubt it, but you never know about humans -- they are unpredictable sometimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: XPLODING ELEPHANT Posted by: Lauren
» RE: XPLODING ELEPHANT Posted by: mnatra
So what's new?
Posted by: HughScott on Jun 3, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Born in 1935, I have witnessed much of the greed-driven, corporate tyranny Chris Hedges correctly complained about. Unfortunately, like many social commentators, he offers no concrete solutions.

That isn't a criticism of Hedges because I believe our nation has become a permanent, two-class, Have and Have-not, corporate-run society. However, there is a glimmer of hope for freedom-loving Americans who refuse to sell their souls to big business for survival. Vote for Barack Obama in November.

-------------------------

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com -- the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Critics and Politicians Posted by: pdxstudent
One simple solution
Posted by: nodozejoze on Jun 3, 2008 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There is a simple...and singular solution to the sad demise of democracy in the US but alas! people there are immune to it. Its called activism, or hitting the streets.

I remember when in the late 60´s the papers were full of this "crisis of democracy" crap. What they meant at the time that there was too much democracy. Blacks and gays, women and Latinos, the "dis"abled and environmentalists--all were out there, regularly agitating for change and getting a lot of it. (Few remember that the EPA was put in under Nixon).

There are now about 60 million people living in France. 40 years ago there were far fewer yet in 1968, 10 MILLION people stopped everything and threw out DeGaulle and instituted democracy in streets. A national strike.

10 MILLION.

In the US "sympathy" strikes were declared illegal so USAmericans became chickenshits overnight and fled to their TVs. To paraphrase the USAmerican expat featured in Michael Moore´s "SiCKO"--in France, the government fears the people; in the US, the people fear the government.

Change that, and you will get what you want.
Simple.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

you mean
Posted by: queerunity on Jun 3, 2008 9:23 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we arent already a corporate state?
http://www.queersunited.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: you mean Posted by: HoboHomo
Obama is the only possible presidential candidate/impeach bush NOW
Posted by: smadaj on Jun 3, 2008 9:36 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Obama gets this stuff. Not as deeply, perhaps, but he's headed in the right direction, and is the only person in a position to take power who does see this. Rep's Kucinich and Wexler see these things, too. We need election reform, and then we need to hold our reps accountable to the people, not the corporations. First and foremost, we must impeach Bush and Cheney, and, along with Rice, Powell, Rumsfeld, Ashcroft, Gonzales, Wolfowitz, Libby and others, we must prosecute them for high treason and war crimes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hedges Isn't Really Helping Here
Posted by: kegbot1 on Jun 3, 2008 9:43 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yes it was beautifully eloquent and spot on.

But,

What were his solutions?

Oh yes, march around lobbying and shouting and, in general saying 'no, no, no, we really mean it this time - give us back our democracy.'

How do you lobby a legislature that no longer hears you or wants to hear you? How do fight for democracy in a system where the entire game is rigged - throw one set of rascals out and Corporate America puts another set of rascals up to take their place.

Many here who comment understand that the game is too far gone. Yes even a cornered rat will fight - but too many Americans don't feel that cornered yet. And you can't eat freedom - a nation which elevates the having of things above human rights is easy pickings for tyrants. And Americans are, unfortunately, very easily led.

Yes power cedes nothing without a demand. But what happens when the demands are met with a simple sneer?

The French, a people we've been taught to deride as 'surrender monkeys' take to the streets and launch strikes which bring the state to it's knees. But Americans are far too servile to have the cojones of the French people - if we tried that, we might get fired! Ooooh! Scary.

I'm getting tired of these articles and discussions. I suppose at some point the people will revolt although it will probably be too late and diffused at that point. I guess in the end we get what we deserve.

http://badamerican.wordpress.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Jefferson
Posted by: reverendnick on Jun 3, 2008 10:00 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our moneyed corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country."

"If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their money,
first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks), will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered."

"...whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive to these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Goverment, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness...But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invarialbly the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Great quote...But- Posted by: arieden
» RE: Great quote...But- Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Jefferson Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Jefferson Posted by: luckypuck
I see said the blind man
Posted by: solrev on Jun 3, 2008 10:01 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“If we do not become angry, if we do not muster within us the courage, indeed the militancy, to challenge those in the Democratic and Republican parties who herd us toward the corporate state, we will have squandered our courage and our integrity when we need it most.”

“We are being impoverished -- legally, economically, spiritually and politically. And unless we soon reverse this tide, unless we wrest the state away from corporate hands, we will be sucked into the dark and turbulent world of globalization where there are only masters and serfs.”

“I am not saying do not vote. We should all vote.”

Whose side are you on? Sounds like another uniter to me. Have we dividers, got a surprise in store for you. We nationalists are going to battle the globalists, so enjoy the show. Like Bush said he would rather fight us over there than here. They have smart bombs and we have a double-edged sword, one side to cut the wheat and one side to cut the chaff. Welcome to the revolution of 2012.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bravo!!!
Posted by: Gravitas on Jun 3, 2008 10:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Finally, something truly worthy posted on Alternet. I echo the sentiments of "brilliant." There is nothing more to say except BRAVO!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

yikes
Posted by: blogfrog on Jun 3, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Hedges can grab us by the ears, look us in the eyes and tell us what we need to hear over and over again and it simply won't stick. We are the citizens of the american empire and we choose to stay in our seats at the coliseum. Seats we bought and paid for by our own ego, self-interest and self stimulation...blinded to the realities around us.

Waiter, another mojito and pass me that fiddle!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: yikes Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: yikes Posted by: blogfrog
Exactly
Posted by: ceti on Jun 3, 2008 10:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every generation and every revolution creates elicits countermeasures. The political elites have perfected a system of control through the media, through the atomization of life itself where collective action becomes difficult. I'm afraid the internet, while a bright shining possibility, has already been countered as a tool for organizing by corporate domination, information dumping, and paid trolling that undermines what has been called reality-based reasoning.

What can we do? Babylon the Great has arisen in our midst and there will be no escape even if the latest spokesperson is more charismatic and affable. And if Obama fails (which he most certainly will given the overwhelming challenges and his already weak-kneed buckling to the right), will even the notions of Hope and Change themselves go with him?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I think it's pretty simple folks...
Posted by: Blue Heron on Jun 3, 2008 11:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
STOP the CEO worship! They are nothing more than ordinary human beings, so why all the fuss? You'd think for example that Steve Jobs poops gold nuggets, the way you people go on about him. If you bow down to someone they will abuse you. So just stop being cattle and think for yourselves. And I say this not in a critical spirit, but with the hope that you will see through all the bull, wake up and please protect yourselves.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On the VERGE of becoming a full-blown corporate state???
Posted by: songbird1268 on Jun 3, 2008 11:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Gee, I was under the impression that we already were.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» We're close, but Posted by: WhuThe?!?
» Those Halliburton prisons are real. Posted by: nochicagoboys
Collapse is the right word
Posted by: badkitty on Jun 3, 2008 11:20 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are living through something it never occurred to me that I would see, the collapse of the government and entity of the United States, and of the world's environment at the same time. I never thought I would see either one of them, much less both (and at the same time!) Our government has been in a state of collapse for seven years now, except for collecting taxes and waging an illegal war of aggression. It has been incapable of providing aid to victims of a terrible hurricane, aid to schools, cleaning up air and water, much less responding to climate change. Cities and states are acting on their own, because the federal government is missing in inaction. The San Francisco Bay Area is supposed to be the 17th largest economy in the world, right between The Netherlands and Switzerland, and frankly, I think we should be our own country. As soon as that 7.5 earthquake hits, I'm pretty sure we will be. Based on New Orleans, we can expect no aid from the government--we can just stop paying taxes, and anyone who wants to fight Bush's illegal wars can move somewhere else.

This article/speech is, as everyone says, brilliant, especially those two paragraphs citing the crimes of George W. Bush. I don't know why it reminds me of the Declaration of Independence citing the crimes of King George III, but it does. Perhaps, if we want to try the noble experiment again, with some updating, we'd like to use those paragraphs in a new Declaration.

Obama has hope, I don't. With oil on the way out, our civilization is dying, the planet is undergoing serious climate change, and I don't think we can stop events.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Collapse is the right word Posted by: HoboHomo
Christisvictor
Posted by: Christisvictor on Jun 3, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Isn't notions regarding "choice" to abort a pregnancy dangerously close to playing God? Is population control an answer? Wow! The article contains truths about a serious situation. There are answers but the number of people has nothing to do with the greed, corruption, and vice. As a matter of fact, whether few or many people, those characteristics will be around. The problem has answers but population shrinkage is not one of them. Mercy and grace has to figure in the answer or flesh begets flesh. There is and will be an answer but like anything, many will not like it. I know an answer, but I am one person and for this, much fellowship is needed, not the idea of one person with an amen corner. Obama 08!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Christisvictor Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Christisvictor Posted by: bcgirl125
there might be a simpler explanation...
Posted by: Annapurna1 on Jun 3, 2008 11:28 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and thats simple demographics...

i dont mean to defend fascism in any way.. there is no defense for fascism..period...

the "however" is that the population is getting older..especially the voting population...and unlike younger voters..older voters derive their incomes more from investments and less from wages...

to repeat ..this is no excuse for fascism...but given the above..its not difficult to understand why older voters would elect the most investor-freindly govt.. even if that means fascism (and bush fascism has delivered)...furthermore..such voters stand to lose far fewer years of their lives to a fascist state than do younger voters...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: When you say investments Posted by: Annapurna1
American passivity
Posted by: Bastet62 on Jun 3, 2008 12:58 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans have been trained since infancy to become passive, a passive people are easier to control - which is why what Hedges so eloquently and succinctly describes is happening. I'm reminded of the recent story of the baby that was being dragged off by a coyote - the women who witnessed it, in order to save the baby, stomped on the ground while the other woman pulled the baby away from the coyote. Really? Stomped on the ground? If a coyote grabbed my kid or anyone else's kid I would've kicked a field goal with that damn coyote - even though I'd probably face animal cruelty charges at some ridiculous point. What about these idiots in TX, these people had their kids taken away and the men won't go on camera and the women look like pioneer versions of the Stepford wives - if the state took my kids you can bet I'm not going to take the time to iron my little hanky and poof my hair a mile high -I'm going downtown with my lawyer to kick somebody's ass whether figurative or not! Or take for instance the beating of a bus driver caught on camera - where were the other passengers? Sitting in their seats with their mouths open doing nothing. I guess that's what happened on board certain aircraft where guys with box knives killed a stewardess etc and people sat in their seats and mouth breathed. This is America. Passive, afraid, cowardly, far too comfortable doing nothing. How many of us have been out on the street with fliers and speeches telling people just what this gov't is doing - the torture, the crimes, the loss of civil and human rights, and what do people do? They keep walking, they mouth breath, they go buy more plastic crap from China, they don't want to read a flier because it has too many words on it, and they ignore the truth. And the few of us who go out and try to do something to educate the public about what's going on, in an effort to stop the horrid Bush agenda - we're called traitors, terrorist appeasers, and America haters by other Americans.
Go figure.
Realize that 50% of America voted for Bush TWICE. That's the mentality of America, add the passivity factor and you've got yourself a fully fledged third world country in the making right here in the good ol' U.S.A.. And the people are going to mouth breath all the way to the bread lines.... for a little while anyway, then history will do what history does and there'll be a bloody revolution - a revolution that could be totally prevented if people would stop their passive mouth breathing and think about someone other than themselves and their immediate comfort! Like their country, their children, their world, but I guess it's just easier to ignore it all.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: American passivity Posted by: HoboHomo
» Its not just passivity.. Posted by: Drclaw
» RE: American passivity Posted by: Dboy
» RE: American passivity Posted by: 2dogarage
Except for the comments about the media, an excellent piece
Posted by: Rod from Canada on Jun 3, 2008 1:16 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Surely the reach of alternative media today, on the Internet and elswhere, means that many, many people have, and rely on, sources other than the MSM. So I don't think it is accurate to say that the (U.S. in this case) population is captive to four giant media groups.

That said, I wonder if what is occuring in the U.S. (and perhaps to a degree elsewhere, although not as pronounced) is not a return to a form of civilization and society that has been more the norm in history, than the exception - that is to a form of feudalism, featuring masses of poor people, governed by a tiny and very wealthy elite at the top?

Maybe democracies characterized by approximate equal distributions of wealth and large middle classes are the exception, and U.S. society is returning to 'normal'? Of course, I hope that is not the reality, but I wonder.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

stop voting for the democrats and republicans
Posted by: grkjr on Jun 3, 2008 2:36 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you read this article and then conclude a vote for obama or clinton is the answer.. they goodness goodness.... for the uptenth time the democrats and the republicans have presided over the decay of this country... the democrats of the new deal period or not those sitting on the hill today....get it... get it...."stop voting for the least of the two evils" it is still evil. Any congressperson of substance would have left the party and started a new progressive party a long time ago.. but no.. they continue to feed you chicken fat and we continue to treat it like steak... we continue to send them back to congress even though they continue to keep the status quo going...NO IMPEACHIMENT, NO END OF THE WAR, NO STOPPING BUSH FROM HIS CRIMES... as if bush is the problem.. one little man.. no no no the problem is congress who fails to act when the crazy little man does his thing.. WHAT NEEDS TO HAPPEN FOR US TO WAKE UP ???? vote for nader for green for anyone but those who have sat while we went from there to here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good article, but it's way too late
Posted by: luckypuck on Jun 3, 2008 2:59 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The only Republican presidential candidate I’ve EVER voted for was Dwight D. Eisenhower. That was also the first time I ever voted. I voted for him because he hinted at problems that I believed were quietly building behind the political scenes. Then, in Eisenhower’s farewell address in 1961, he confirmed for me the potential abuses of power that I originally suspected and feared.

Eisenhower said, the “conjunction of an immense military establishment and a large arms industry is new in the American experience. The total influence — economic, political, even spiritual — is felt in every city, every statehouse, every office of the federal government. We recognize the imperative need for this development. Yet we must not fail to comprehend its grave implications. Our toil, resources and livelihood are all involved; so is the very structure of our society.

“In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. We should take nothing for granted. Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry can compel the proper meshing of the huge industrial and military machinery of defense with our peaceful methods and goals so that security and liberty may prosper together.”

So why are we surprised now? Why are we only now raising objections? We have three candidates who are an integral part of this “complex.” Why would any of them want to bite the hands that feed, clothe and house them, keep them in yachts and mansions and limos and swimming pools and everything else. Our entire government is corrupted. Most likely it’s too late to reverse the process. Hope springs eternal, but I fear it must wait for another century.

Note: "Only an alert and knowledgeable citizenry . . . " No where near enough of us have been alert and knowledgeable enough to make a difference, although we came pretty close in the sit-ins and protest marches of the 1960s and 70s. In the forty-odd years since then, we’ve deliberately and consciously been lulled into inaction by an ever-present “false sense of security.” The stranglehold of the oligarchy and the corporatocracy can only be changed by the concerted actions of we, the electorate. But, since that hasn’t happened in the last forty years, does anyone see that happening in the near future? I don’t.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Took A Long Time For Me To Get This...
Posted by: Freticat on Jun 3, 2008 3:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
More years ago than I care to admit, my high school Econ teacher told my class that, taken to its extremes, capitalism and communism were indistinguishible. I didn't really get what he meant, but the remark stuck with me, and now I know. There is little to differentiate state ownership of production and corporate ownership of the state. In both cases the people are subjugated to the interests of production at the expense of their freedom, health and dignity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: capitalism v. communism Posted by: warble
Hey Obama, I found your Vice President!
Posted by: jreal on Jun 3, 2008 3:34 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Chris Hedges for VP!!

Very well done. Especially about the economic book cooking. The CPI, the inflation, and unemployment.

I hope this article is dispersed aggressively at the college before Bush's arrival.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RN
Posted by: mnatra on Jun 3, 2008 4:02 PM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
GREAT INFORMATIVE PIECE OF WRITING.No matter what,
the ruling elite will keep control.We must leave the country.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: N Posted by: Dboy
corporatism
Posted by: jc1234 on Jun 3, 2008 5:40 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Somehow the words and profound meaning of Patrick Henry's simple "Give me liberty or give me death" is lost to many Americans. It isn't with me.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: corporatism Posted by: Dboy
Overcome by events...coming to a theater near you
Posted by: phshafe on Jun 3, 2008 6:11 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As I ride my bike home from work, with SUV's whizzing past and often communicating their displeasure at having to share the road with bikers, I know in my soul that we've lost the wherewithal to confront, much less reverse, our current course. Rather, the energy armageddon we face comprises a series of events that will overcome us, with tragic results. What really frightens me about this is that Germany, which is 20+ light years ahead of us in laying groundwork to deal with energy transition, concedes they don't really have a solution, just a palliative. That leaves us in the 9th circle of Dante's Hell, which is what people who slaughter foreign children for a temporary resource boost precisely deserve.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

An alternative movement ,to the status quo?
Posted by: BlueGorilla on Jun 3, 2008 7:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The question now,has to be,what course of action can and should be taken,to remedy America's problems?
A change of personnel would have,at best, only a marginal effect.Even Monty Burns-Murdoch is saying nice things about Obama,so that shows that the Democrats are fundamentally impotent.
In terms of being a vehicle for the necessary shift which the US needs to make,the Democratic Party appears to be a dead duck..
They have no real vision for shifting power,back to the citizens,and clipping the wings of the corporations (on whom they are reliant of course).
The only answer,seems,to be creating something new(ish) beyond,or extraneous to the established parties.
This has to be,a grass roots movement,with wide appeal,connecting disparate radical,progresive and (abandoned)centrist individuals and groups across the US.The likeliest candidates to come under this big umbrella could be,the unions,the civil rights groups,the greens ,the Naderites,those seeking greater corporate governance,plus the long abandoned and forgotten poorer ex-voters,who have forgotten the point of voting etc .This latter group could be politically re-energized,if they were convinced,there were a point to getting involved.
This movement needs to have some shared goals .and don't shoot me,as these are just a few suggestions...The movement could either be a progressive,and united alliance of the above groups which pressures governments,or it could be a whole new political party.
The themes and priogramme ,which link it could be.. firstly a programme ,based on increased democracy..
1) extension of participatory democracy,at all levels,perhaps building on Ralph Naders ideas.2)The excluding of corporations from the political lobbying process (ie the buying of politicians).3)moving towards creating a fair and balanced media..as opposed to the jackals,who unquestioningly banged the drum,for the anti-patriotic Iraq war.4)A bill to reverse the intertwining of state and church as overseen by the Evangelical loons.

Environmentally there could be a programme to press for,support etc new laws on emmisions,local food production,clean air etc .The tax system needs to encourage the use of greener vehicles,whilst rebuilding an efficient,safe reliable public transport system.Environmental problems and responsibilities need to be central.. and on and on.
Anyway lets face it,any mass progressive movement,will have more expert,and knowledgeable minds than mine to design environmental goals .
Socially the movement could cohere around
1)A socialised healthcare programme based around creating a system,where all who need treatment ,receive it as a right,regardless of ability to pay.2)Tough legislation to outlaw discrimination based on race,sexuality etc.3)A programme of investment in children,to stem and reverse the tide of failing educational standards 4) Improved child care facilities,giving each family, state assisted childcare ,based on need .5)An aim to prevent outsourcing of labour to China and other cheap labour economies 6)An end to state subsidies/tax breaks for corporations..(you wanted a freemarket Walmart,so stop scrounging)7)A massive hike in the minimum wage.

Internationally the first priority is 1) pulling out of Iraq,immediately..and then 2)Ending partisanship with Israel in the Middle east..and 3)Full involvement in the UN,and also seeking to make it more responsive to disasters,and dealing with oppressive regimes.
Ive left this vague and broad,as it would just be a starting point..plus it is important to unite all progressives around a programme,they could all agree on.

Taking this forward,will demand a mass movement,of loosely based ,but broadly united groups..it could be a pressure group..or better still a new political party..God knows there is a huge gap waiting to be filled.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Did you say "on the verge of becming?
Posted by: LetsSaveDemocracy on Jun 3, 2008 7:42 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this looks fun- a CIA and army general who says we've been taken over...

gotta see this:

http://carolynbaker.net/static/index.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Taxation without Representation?
Posted by: shanaza on Jun 4, 2008 7:21 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is quite simple, really. Only the ignorant, cowardly or mentally lazy fund this system through taxes. In which category are you?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Appeal of Hedges is his honest, bold, common sense Approach. We need more of it.
Posted by: yellow on Jun 4, 2008 9:17 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why are the Democrats so afraid to say what Hedges is saying here? Such an approach would have wide appeal. I say throw caution to the wind. We need fear only fear itself.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I Go Pogeaux
Posted by: tom cady on Jun 4, 2008 10:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities.
-- Voltaire

In a world that contains Laffer Curve, an Axis of Evil, Iraqi Freedom, Mission Accomplished, Clear Skies, Clean Waters, Healthy Forests, Family Values, No Child Left Behind, and a Patriot Act it is a good reminder for our time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I hope they boycott Bush's speech
Posted by: 2dogarage on Jun 4, 2008 11:43 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The graduating class has a unique opportunity to make a statement "heard around the world" by boycotting his speech at the commencement.

They could also stand with their backs to him. Always the young people on the front lines...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Bravo Hedges!
Posted by: Earthian on Jun 4, 2008 2:18 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a groundbreaking, important speech. The more of us who can write and deliver such speeches, the better. The essence of the idea is the “corporate state.” Charles Derber in his book “Hidden Power” elaborates the concept under the name “corporate regime.” Since it spans political parties, and takes them over, it expands the debate about history, and therefore, gives us a better vision of the future beyond rule by the other party. In Derber’s terminology, the vision is a new progressive regime (in Hedges terminology the corporate state would become a progressive state, like the New Deal state of 1932 to about 1975). Of course solutions to transform the corporate regime (or state) into a new progressive regime (or state) remain to be developed and implemented. But he made reference to anger, courage and hope, surely emotional resources for each of us. And his call is clear: “militancy, to challenge those in the Democratic and Republican parties who herd us towards the corporate state.” How shall we challenge those in both parties? THAT is the solution for progressives. It will involve the Green Party. It will involve infiltration of the Democratic Party. It will involve activism, and movements, and militancy, and constitutional conventions and amendments, and political unity we have yet to invent. But we can, we must, rise up to bring about a progressive regime from what will be the ruins of the corporate regime of America.

Corporate State: 1980 to 20__? RIP

Let us implement the creation of a new progressive nation. And expunge the militarist, imperial, military-industrial-corporate-congressional complex and its corruption of our nation forever.

Bravo Hedges! And bravo to all of you posters who don’t yield to cynicism: the self-fulfilling, psychological defense of weakness to power and its accompanying rejection of solutions.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

BRAVO Mr. Hedges!!! He was not meant to provide solutions, that's OUR job.
Posted by: Turiye on Jun 6, 2008 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Americans are free to disagree with the law not to disobey it. For a government of laws and laws of men, no man, however prominent and powerful, and no mob, however unruly or boisterous, is entitled to defy a court of law. If this country should ever reach the point where any man or group of men by force or threat of force could long defy the commands of our courts and our Constitution, then no law shall stand free from doubt, no judge would be sure of his writ, and no citizen would be safe from his neighbors.

John Fitzgerald Kennedy
30 September 1962

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Beyond Impeachment - Conviction of High Crimes
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jun 8, 2008 3:33 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Impeachment of this Admin is mute.
Even Investigating the crimes of this Admin is Mute. Indictemnts are Mute....Convictions for High crimes is Not only Appropriate and Imparitive.
This Admin has not only betrayed US, it ahs set a prescendence around the World. We must not only Punish These ccriminals fro their crimes against US, but those of the World Community. I am Not just referring to their 'blood for Oil' campaign they have waged over the last few Decades.But for their brazen examaple to other 'leaders' how even a country such as Ours can be Highjacked.
How do we expect the Isreali's to stand Up agaisnt their 'Gov't' (64% want peace in the M.E.by any means possible). How do we expect Iraqi's to control of their situtation, Iranians to Rein in their reckless president...If We are Unable or unwilling to hold Ours Resposnible. We are the leaders of the World- not our Gov't- but Our Values and Princples- OUr Contstitution, Declaration of Independence is a Beacon for All mankind.The William Wallace War Cry heard round the World.This admin actions have Embolden Sociopaths around the World to follow their Lead . I fsuch High Crimes are not Punished here- what is the likelihood anything will be done to the others? We don't just deserve 'payback' for the crimes they have committted agaisnt US, or the effects it will have on Our children..We must do this for All mankind and It's future. We must push Gov't , Industry (commerce) and Religion back to where they belong - In to mankinds Tool Box- to be Used only when and How it is appropriate.Brick and Mortar (and the criminals who have been given the Privildge to over see them) must be put In their place- Under OUR Thumb!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great Article!
Posted by: pana on Jun 9, 2008 9:37 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thanks for the article. I agree. This country is in deep trouble. People need to understand that WE are the government and because of our own greed and lack of intelligence, we are where we are.

NCLB, high stakes testing, the IRAQ War, our drinking water, our environment, NAFTA, the stock market, energy crisis, global warming, housing, health care - all in crisis, are problems because WE didn't take action. We were lulled into complacency.

I just hope this country is smart enough to realize that WE are the government. And it is US that must become more active.

We need to understand the propaganda techniques of the corporations. The corporations don't care about us; they manipulate us, and like blind sheep we follow. All I have to do is look around at the many who have "boob" jobs, face lifts, get their lips injected, botox, and so on. Egads, our young think that it's better to be hooked in than commune with nature and their parents don't realize that they need to parent. Instead they blame others for the travesties of their own making. They blame schools. Schools are NOT the problem. WE are the problem. What is wrong with this picture? Then there are people who believe that they're invisible friend is better than another person's invisible friend, and vote on the basis of religion instead of critical thinking.

This current situation will take ALL of us working together, putting our individual prejudices aside and valuing diversity, for diversity is what made this country strong. I think we still have a chance. But, we don't have much time.

Vote with your mind, not your individual petty prejudices. The day Bush and Cheney leave office we should all celebrate, but only if another ninny isn't voted in. Vote OBAMA. He's the only real chance we have. Stand by OBAMA, and hold Congress accountable if they allow their petty little empires to get in the way of change. Lastly, don't believe all you read in the newspapers and over the airways for they are only spouting the company line.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement