Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Six Reasons Why Women Are the Most Important Audience for Changing the World

By Lisa Witter and Lisa Chen, Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.. Posted June 2, 2008.


Contrary to popular belief, women make a lot of money -- and they spend a good amount of it on charitable causes.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Lisa Witter Lisa Chen

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following is an excerpt from Lisa Witter and Lisa Chen's new book, The She Spot: Why Women Are the Market for Changing the World -- And How to Reach Them (Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. 2007).

The Home Depot of today is a lot different than it was ten years ago. The stores feel less cluttered and more airy. Everything, from light fixtures to carpet samples, is more stylish and varied. Home décor departments have been expanded. The company's ad campaigns and catalogues, which used to simply showcase products, now feature more people. In its first six months, a new store feature, "Do-It-Herself" workshops, drew 40,000 women.

Stonyfield Farm grew from being a seven-cow organic farming school in the early '80s into a company with $250 million in annual sales. Every cup of Stonyfield yogurt bears a personal message from the CEO and founder Gary Hirshberg. Turn the lid over and you'll find tips on how to make the world a better place. Stonyfield was ahead of the curve when it came to products that had special appeal to moms, like Yo-Baby yogurt and calcium-fortified yogurt. All of this has been critical to the company's surge as the fastest-growing yogurt company in the world.

The success of these companies is representative of a sea change in the business world in the past 10 years as business leaders have come to recognize women as much more than an "emerging" or niche market. Today, women represent the largest and most important consumer market there is.

How did this happen? It began with demographic changes among women themselves in their roles at work and at home. Today, women make 83 percent of all consumer purchases -- everything from breakfast cereal to big-ticket items like cars and personal computers -- for themselves and for their families. They are also responsible for 80 percent of all health care-related decisions for their households.

Wising up to the power of the purse and its ripple effects in the marketplace, smart companies began putting female customers first by thinking creatively and critically about what they want. They shaped the consumer experience to appeal to women from the minute they walk into the store or click on the company Web site, all they way through the point of purchase.

As marketing gurus Tom Peters and Marti Barletta put it, there is "a widespread recognition among business leaders of the blazingly obvious ... that women are where the money is."

Yet the non-profit and political sectors have been slower to pick up on this demographic revolution. Not only do women have the power to profoundly influence the world of consumer goods, they also have the power to rouse and accelerate our ability to do good -- provided we know to unleash that power.

Women: A Non-Profit's Best Friend

A few years ago our colleagues at Fenton were working to rebrand Infact, a venerable non-profit organization that burst on the scene more than three decades ago with a successful worldwide boycott of Nestlé. The food giant was aggressively marketing its brand of baby formula to mothers in developing countries. The only problem was, the formula for making the formula -- add water and stir -- was hurting and, in some cases, killing infants because some local water supplies were too polluted for their young stomachs.

The organization had since developed a formidable track record of forcing major corporations, including Big Tobacco, to the table to reform their abusive business practices. As part of the rebranding process, we asked them who their target audience was. They replied, "women." Specifically women in their 40s to 60s, because they made up the group's core funding base and were also their most loyal and active members.

This isn't true for all non-profits, of course, but it is for a surprising number of them, including ones that work on issues that are not considered traditional "women's issues." The progressive online group, MoveOn.org, for example, has more than three million members; the average donor profile is a woman in her mid-40s. Women give, and what they give can help make the backbone of an organization.

So as Infact was rethinking their name (they are known today as Corporate Accountability International), our colleagues made sure their new and improved identity system spoke to their base. Part of this involved shaping their message and their mission -- fighting bad-guy corporations -- so neither strayed too far from the "why" driving their work. Their organization tagline today is, "Challenging Abuse. Protecting People."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: gender, women, marketing, charity, business, spending, non-profit

Lisa Witter is Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Fenton Communications. She head the firm's practice in women's issues and global affairs. She is a political and social commentator and blogger.

Lisa Chen, Senior Vice President at Fenton Communications, is the firm's head editor and writer. Her writing has been published in the New York Times, USA Today, the Boston Globe, the San Francisco Chronicle, and other leading dailies.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Don't Just try to Chenge the Rules...CHANGE THE GAME!!!
Posted by: Purple Girl on Jun 2, 2008 4:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let me start by condeming Hillary's tactics while in th eSenate and on th eCampaign trail- She has Done Women a GREAT disservice- in fact has Undermined our 35 yr Effort for Equality.She has PLAYED THE BOYS GAME!!And worse has allowed herself to use the most grievous of excuses- "Sexism". She has Taken US about 10 steps backwards by playing this 'Card'. 'Equality' doe NOT want or Expect a 'Bar' to be lowered as an Accomodation, It feeds right into the 'Ism'. We are unable to compete Unless Someone makes Special execptions,Priviledges.This Old 'Clintonian' has come to not only Hate the Clintons- But Fear the effects they have not just on Womens Issues but on National and International Situtations- "Obliterate Iran" is straight out of the 'good Ol' Boy' Handbook!
Women MUST stop believing what they are told and start thinking about the REAL ramifications to their daily Lives and Our Country.Ladies there is a Book Called "1984" by George Orwell- Pick It Up! Read It! Focus on 'Truth Speak'- which comes down to 'Double Speak' phrases Like "Pro Life", "Family Values".When "pro Life" startes at conception and Ends at Birth- THAT IS NOT 'PRO LIFE"! When 'Family Values'= Banning Gay Marriage, but Fails to hold Dead Beat Dads responsible for their Children, or ignores the decaying Education system, Lays you or your Husband Off Work, Forecloses on Your House- It IS NOT a 'FAMILY VALUE'. When The auto industry tells You it is far better to have a backseat DVD player then RollOver Protection incorproated in it's vehicle design, You are Being CONNED!
When a Candidate Tells You SHE has Been fighting for You for 35 yrs- and YOU KNOW that on average Females have only Gotten a $0.02 Raise in that Time ($0.77/$1.00) and Your Reproductive Rights has been beaten down to the mat and On the 9 Count- YOU ARE BEING CONNED. When Any Politician has spent Decades in Gov't and Has allowed this situation to come to fruition THEY ARE NOT A CANDIDATE FOR CHANGE- THEY ARE COMPLICITE!!!!
LOOK DOWN LADIES- YOUR GULLIBLE DESPERATION SLIP IS SHOWING!
WE are Not just the Other Half of the 'Steward' Species - we are THEE Stewards to the Other Half Too! We ahv eSpent Millenia being oppressed, Gagged and Bound by the Males who have chosen to Use our Communal Tools against US. Not just Gov't and Industry but he first Denier, Deceiver and Ultimate enable to the others Religion.As soon as they MADE Mary Magdellan a 'Whore' they Enslaved US All!And the rest have been using this against US ever since as a 'Divine' Right!We are Not th e'Weaker 'Sex we are the Stronger because WE HAVE TO BE. As the commercial so aptly stated "We bring home the bacon AND we fry it up in the Pan" The 'Bar ' has ALWAYS been Higher For US.Let Us Reclaim not only OUR Seat at the Table But at the Head Of it. The Males have Proven they are Incapable of Being the Sole Stewards of this World.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Sorry Purple Girl Posted by: lefty010
Lisa & Lisa
Posted by: Last Chance on Jun 2, 2008 4:12 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't know which Home Depot you're talking about. The one I go to is still the same dismal warehouse it always was -- and why do women have to be the targets of yet another marketing strategy? Its time they targeted the Male Establishment with their demand for a smaller population and a peaceful World in which they can be thelselves instead of pawns in the New World Order.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lisa & Lisa Posted by: phatkhat
Now that women have become rich and powerful . . .
Posted by: Moonray on Jun 2, 2008 4:42 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
and a majority of registered voters . . . any chance that they will stop whining and claiming victim status at every opportunity?

I think we all know the answer to that one.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ugh!!!
Posted by: lefty010 on Jun 2, 2008 5:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Sorry, but I only read the first page of this article. It's all I could stomach.

Really, the last thing women need is to be "marketed" to anymore. The cosmetics, fashion, diet and cleaning "marketing" campaigns(among others) have already done their damage by perpetuating an impossible image of what it is to be a woman. The biggest problem with "marketing" to women is that it keeps them occupied with ridiculous, meaningless, MINDLESS shit so that they are lulled away from really taking action against a system (patriarchal) that wholly undermines, demeans and oppresses them.

I say that if women weren't already so fucking distracted by all the commercial CRAP that is always in their faces the men would face a backlash of revolutionary proportions.

PLEASE stop "marketing" to us silly lil' women folk!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ugh!!! Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Ugh!!! Posted by: WyrdSister
» RE: Ugh!!! Posted by: fork
» No miss here Posted by: lefty010
Otto .
Posted by: otto on Jun 2, 2008 5:37 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Basically I agree with what I read...but the basic problem in everything is that we generalize too much. Just who exactly is "women"? There are many individual men and individual women; not all women fit this picture, and they fit in varying degrees. Take my wife for example (please take her!)...who has "credit-carded" us into $30,000 extra debts...much in her kind-heartedness to her family...in whom she can find no fault. She says she has reformed and seen the light, but I still see most of the same patterns of behavior...maybe a little new insight. We all generalize too much.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Otto . Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Otto . Posted by: Last Chance
» RE: Otto . Posted by: ankhet
Naaah!
Posted by: ankhet on Jun 2, 2008 6:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't buy it. This is just a shift in marketing styles, finally an awareness that it is women who do most of the shopping in any household (because men won't do "women's work"). A. What took them so long to realize that? B. Changing the jargon doesn't improve the world. and C. The world can't be fixed by more marketing, more shopping, or more pastel-coloured dreams.

How can women improve the world? By getting men to do their share - such as 1. shopping for their own underwear and socks, 2. getting men away from their hobbies - porn, computers, sports, tv, beer, and getting them more involved in child-rearing, elder care, houswework, and all the other "unimportant" stuff that gets dumped on women, 3. getting men to create environments that are human- and nature-sustaining and -sustainable, 4. refusing to make babies if men are just going to kill them off with famines, plagues and institutionalized mass-murder of war and genocide 5. getting men to recognize that property, power and greed are not the ultimate goals of a healthy society or a healthy spirit, 6. getting men to replace soul- and -resource killing patriarchy with true democracy. (Men really ought to be behind this one, as patriarchy corporate, political or military, kills more men than anything else does.)

A pretty speech on a yogurt lid will not change the world. It's a manipulative crock. I'm not saying nice people like Stonyfield (really good yogurt, BTW) are being deliberately dishonest, necessarily; I'm saying they and others just don't get the scope of the problem. it's structural, not cosmetic.

"Fix It Herself"? (she doesn't do enough already?) That's pretty insulting - do we need a gender-segregated class to demonstrate the use of a hammer or a putty knife? Or is the toolshed a man's domain and the presence of women in the group would distress the manly-men there?

Basically, women have to stop playing along with this ridiculous imbalance and assert themselves. Dagwood doesn't know best - often I think women are just too timid or passive. If they see a better way, it's not fair to let the men flounder in their colossal ignorance and then blame them when stuff goes wrong.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Naaah! Posted by: fork
» RE: Naaah! Posted by: ankhet
» RE: Naaah! Posted by: fork
» That's a good one Posted by: MartianBachelor
Another winner from OvaryNet
Posted by: sweetlou on Jun 2, 2008 8:27 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A while back, I quit visiting the site due to preponderance of anti male articles. Thought I'd check back in. I have to admit, I was not disappointed to find nothing has changed.

TTFN...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Another winner from OvaryNet Posted by: WyrdSister
» actually Posted by: leta
» Ridiculous assertions Posted by: lefty010
» RE: idiculous assertions Posted by: leta
» RE: idiculous assertions Posted by: leta
» prove the matriarchy Posted by: lefty010
» RE: prove the matriarchy Posted by: leta
» RE: prove the matriarchy Posted by: lefty010
» RE: prove the matriarchy Posted by: leta
» RE: prove the matriarchy Posted by: leta
» RE: prove the matriarchy Posted by: leta
» Another ridiculous assertion Posted by: lefty010
» Too bad.... Posted by: lefty010
» RE: Too bad.... Posted by: leta
There's plenty of male sexism from alternet users.
Posted by: yellow on Jun 3, 2008 7:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The fact that women are disproportionately charitable is true. I know this first hand. They are less judgemental about those in need of various types of assistance and more ready to unconditionally donate funds, time, effort and political support. Social work would be much less effective without their efforts and generosity. The entire field is mostly women even at the top. I praise their continued efforts. The criticisms by Alternet Users of this article are small minded, misguided and utterly sexist.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Where Would You Be?
Posted by: Southern Gal on Jun 3, 2008 9:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A woman carried you in her body and gave you birth. A woman most likely cleaned your bottom, cleaned your house, cooked your meals, took you to school, attended your performances in sports and school events, worked outside the home, worked inside the home and tried to make you feel loved as well as be self reliant. My husband claims that women could shut down much of society by refusing to have sex with men. He says that we have the ultimate tool but refuse to use it. The trouble with women is that they are usually caretakers and peace makers. Women want people to be happy and not to fight. We are not in a fight between the sexes. We are in a fight with corporations and monied interests. Men and women will have to work together to make changes in governance and in society that benefit women, children and men. Women have been second class citizens or less for most of time. Don't begrudge us our achievements. Encourage your daughters and sisters and mothers to break barriers and to join in the fight to save our democracy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Where Would You Be? Posted by: Crazy H
At least now we know who to blame
Posted by: MartianBachelor on Jun 3, 2008 11:23 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So women are responsible for 80+% of all the spending in the economy?

I guess that accounts for why the whole damn country has been converted to one big strip mall, why TV is so crappy, why the gummint is in debt for gazillions, why our political campaigns are totally content-free... I'm sure I could go on.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]