Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement

Right Is Wrong -- How the Lunatic Fringe Hijacked America

By Arianna Huffington, Knopf Publishing. Posted May 22, 2008.


The GOP is now a dark, putrefied party of Bush, Cheney, Rove, Limbaugh and Coulter. And we're all the worse because of it.
huffingtonstory
huffington

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

More stories by Arianna Huffington

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

The following is an excerpt from Arianna Huffington's new book, Right Is Wrong.

The Radical Takeover

The most sweeping takeover of the new millennium didn't take place among the telecoms or the big oil companies, or in Silicon Valley. It took place in Washington, but we can see and hear and feel its effects nationwide on our televisions, radios, and computer screens. And America is much the worse because of it. I'm talking about the takeover of the Republican Party by its own lunatic fringe, and the Right's hijacking of America.

Ronald Reagan's GOP has been replaced by the dark, moldering, putrefied party of Bush, Cheney, Rove, Limbaugh, and Coulter. Morning in America has given way to Midnight in America.

Yes, the Republican Party has always had its far-right cowboys, its Jesse Helmses and Spiro Agnews. Yet they were removed from the party's more sober core.

But these days, judging by the opinions and actions of the Republicans in office and the party's candidates for president, it has become impossible to tell where this core stops and the fanatical fringe begins. Just look at what the party is endorsing.

We have a Republican Party that continues to back the White House's delusions about Iraq at the expense of our military, our treasure, our safety, and our standing in the world.

We have a mainstream on the Right that supports torture, that confirmed an attorney general nominee who is officially agnostic on torture, and that rallies behind a president who refuses to define what the very word "torture" means.

We have a mainstream that supports -- even applauds -- the behavior of thuggish Blackwater mercenaries, that supports the gutting of our civil liberties, that opposes universal health care, and that has views on immigration that wouldn't have been heard outside a John Birch Society meeting ten years ago.

It can no longer be denied: The right-wing lunatics are running the Republican asylum, and their madness has infected the entire country and poisoned the world beyond.

And just look who the GOP settled on as its 2008 standard-bearer: the most hawkish candidate in the running, who has said he wants the United States to stay in Iraq somewhere between one hundred years and ten thousand years -- John McCain.

Despite an avalanche of evidence showing that McCain the Maverick has long ago been replaced by McCain the Pandering Pawn of the Party's Right Wing, the press refuses to believe its own eyes. Right Is Wrong will show how the "Straight Talk Express" and its conductor have completely and cravenly gone off the tracks -- and how the media steadfastly refuse to notice.

Even those bastions of the so-called liberal media, the New Yorker and the New York Times, have continued to portray McCain as a moderate who, in the words of New Yorker writer Ryan Lizza, has "the rare opportunity to reinvent what it means to be a Republican."

Let's see, over the last few years McCain has bowed to the party's lunatic fringe on tax cuts, immigration, the intolerance of religious bigots, and torture ... so you might wonder how is he reinventing what it means to be a Republican?

During the primary campaign, I waited in vain for one of the leading GOP presidential candidates to step away from the twitchy ideologues who have taken over their party, but instead they all held hands with Kristol, Rove, and Limbaugh and jumped. To a man, every one of the top-tier candidates -- Giuliani, Romney, McCain, Thompson, and Huckabee -- seemed intent on competing to see who could out-Bush Bush. Not a single one of them tried to put any distance between himself and the president -- especially on foreign policy, the area of Bush's most catastrophic errors. Former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee made a halfhearted attempt to speak out against an "arrogant bunker mentality" at one point and was called out by Mitt Romney to apologize. Huckabee promptly shut up, putting an end to any further rebellious attempts to amble off the reservation. As conservative pundit George F. Will put it, "They are, if anything, to the right of (Bush) on foreign policy. There's a bidding war to see who can be more hawkish toward Iran."

The reign of Bush and Cheney and the rise of the neocons and the "nea-cons" (the "Neanderthal conservatives") have alienated traditional conservative intellectuals like they have Bill Buckley, the godfather of modern conservatism. In April of 2007, writing about Iraq, Buckley called public opinion on the war "savagely decisive" and concluded, "There are grounds for wondering whether the Republican Party will survive this dilemma."

And Michael Gerson, once Bush's top speechwriter, offered this gloomy 2007 assessment of the state of the GOP: "The party is in a funk. There is a lack of creativity, very little domestic policy energy. I think it's going to be a problem." Of course, along with being one of the party's brightest thinkers, Gerson is a Bush loyalist, so his calling it "a problem" can be translated as "a disaster." If the Republican Party in its current form loses the next general election and ends up fading into obscurity and irrelevancy, we can use the words of Don Rumsfeld (trying to sugarcoat a different debacle) for its epitaph: "The dead-enders are still with us, those remnants of the defeated regimes who'll go on fighting long after their cause is lost."


Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: republicans, gop, conservatives, dick cheney, george bush, arianna huffington, ann coulter, ronald reagan, right is wrong

Find more Arianna at The Huffington Post.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »

Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Unindicted Co-conspirators
Posted by: AlexLawyer on May 22, 2008 12:15 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Good article, but it makes no mention of the Christian evangelicals' gleeful support of criminality, warmongering and human rights violations or the herd of putative intellectuals who used Jesuitry and special pleading to support these nefarious schemes.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right is Wrong but Left isn’t Much Wiser
Posted by: Lector on May 22, 2008 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
“I used to believe that the private sector would address the problems of those in need… but I soon came to see that despite all the lofty talk about dealing with poverty and race, their heart was never in it.”

Both sides have been giving lip service and starting failed token programs, that have led to nowhere, to correct the poverty and race problems for decades ... so they are both phony. And America still has a race problem. So far, both sides of Congress have only affected cosmetic changes for political gains. The government sector addressing the problems today has not and will not do any better as long as the lobbyists control the Congress, as long as the corporations become more powerful. In essence, Capitalism, when corrupted and abused doesn’t work any better than Communism. Both have many similarities and one main difference in accountability and freedom; while the USSR/Russia burned the books, the USA cooked them. Under Communism you have to shut up or end in prison, in America, you are allowed to rant all you want ... because you are then ignored. Maybe this is one reason our government may see websites like this as a good thing. It doesn't really matter what we say or whether the Right is wrong and the Left right.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: not much change, Posted by: donl51
Spot on, Arianna
Posted by: vox persona on May 22, 2008 12:59 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has been the most inept administration in the history of our country. Either that or it was their goal all along to collapse the dollar, baloon the deficit, break the army and trash our leadership, image and moral high ground in the world. In a full scale transfer from taxpayers (our treasury) to corporations and cronies, what we are witnessing is no less than a heist. It's no coincidence that the very industries CheneyBu$hCo emerged from are the very ones who are reaping the windfall of a bogus war based on lies, cherry picked intelligence and fear mongering. Every one of these warmongers somehow evaded combat when it was their time to put it on the line, Cheney through deferments (he had other priorities), and Bush through privilege. Only Colin Powell actually faced combat, and he couldn't be backpedaling faster to distance himself from the way this misadministration carried out their war of choice. What makes their lack of combat service an issue is the cynical way they used an attack on our soil, completely preventable with the intel available to them that they completely ignored (from a CIA Director running around with his hair on fire to PDB's named 'BinLaden Determined To Attack Inside US'), and then fixed the facts around the policy to set their sites on a country completely unrelated to the attack. They played it straight out of the PNAC playbook. They have lied so much about everything that now I look to them as a negative barometer of truth.
Using ever-shifting rationales and retroactive pretexts, we were bulldozed into an unholy occupation of Muslim holy land, led by corrupt one-party rule and an invertebrate 'opposition party'. Freedom Of Information Act efforts after years have yielded the knowledge that Iraq oil maps were on the table at Cheney's 'secret energy policy' meetings, only solidifying the realization that, whatever they said, this war was fought for greed rather than necessity. Even Cheney said back in 1993 that attacking Iraq would lead to endless quagmire, the only difference 10 years later was the value of stocks he owned in Halliburton. I wonder how much they made in no-bid contracts so far? War is big business. The point of the war in Iraq was to have a war in Iraq. Never mind a real war hero/General/President Eisenhower's warning to beware the military industrial complex. This president is little more than a corporation in a suit. They've sold out our national security, our middle class, our treasury, every environmental agency, and every facet of our government for 30 pieces of silver. Now Bush has ripped the lid off of Pandora's Box and then peed in the soup. There is no going back. Now we strengthen Iran by taking out their military counterbalance, reduced a country to rubble, radicalize a generation, provide the perfect jihadist recruiting tool and training ground, and 'liberate' a country that may well elect a Bin Laden if he was on the ticket. We provide a surge to give time for political reconciliation, and what do they do? They go on vacation for a month. So now whose death squads do we endorse? The middle class has already been displaced, all due to the decisions of one man mesmerized by the neocon playbook. Military suicides are at a fever pitch, vets are ill-cared for, troops are under-equipped, all while Rumsfeld glibly said something about going to war with the army we have, not one we wish to have sometime in the future. Cheney said 'Reagan proved deficits don't matter'. Yeah, right. They spent like drunken sailors BEFORE they started
this bogus war, but now we spend $5-6,000 PER SECOND, off budget and borrowed from China to watch it disapper down an unaccountable black hole, paying people who were recently shooting at us, as corrupt Iraqi offuicials and war profiteers make out like bandits. Believe me, the people who were meant to benefit from this war are becoming obscenely rich on blood money....but don't get me started.
Thank you Arianna.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

& still too much hot air.........
Posted by: Smiggsy on May 22, 2008 1:07 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well it doesn't take a genius to figure out whats wrong with rightwing politics in the USA. Yes its all the fault of the serving right-wing executive & previous congressional government.

What I want to know is where is the REAL ACTION that is being done to fix things? What happened about the Dems taking the house of congress? What is the iniative being taken to FIX the problems? Where's the solid effort to make real changes? Stop pointing the finger & do something real. If you all must get out into the streets.....get out into the streets & protest. The Army Police & Security contractors can't kill half the population. Its virtually impossible.

If the right side of politics has truly hijacked the federal government, then there are 3 basic realities (& its in no way definitive):

1). The majority of American voters support right wing politics & consequently you are all governed by the philosophy of the right wing regardless of intended party philosophy. You get what you (in majority) wish.

2). If (1.) is not true (& remember any elected rep from any political party who wins office can be supportive of leftwing or rightwing political philosophy) then the actual VOTE for candidates at the polls is being corrupted. Results are being stolen & this should be considered a crime of high treason. That diebold computer voting is involved this is probably a given. FIX it!

3). Tragically the USA has elected an ineffective left wing congress to government and they have FAILED you. Don't wait for it to fix itself - it won't happen....DEMAND results & stop the general apathy today. EXPOSE the criminals for what & who they are.

If Corporate influence is that instilled in politicians it will absolutely need massive street marches & organized general strikes to force changes to political funding regulations. After all they are spending your money.

I don't profess to know the answers to begin to solve any or all of the USA political machinations, but damn it all you good americans need to start applying some real pressure for political accountability, create some real citizenry action & demand REAL RESULTS from your politicians. Otherwise NOTHING will change. NOTHING. And this my friends is the real tragedy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Reagan Started This Mess ...
Posted by: mmckinl on May 22, 2008 1:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It all started with trickle down. It now ends with our country under water. The Democrats were perfectly willing to go along for the ride and now in the saddle are heading into town to drink with Financial and Media Barons to rustle the last of the herd.

There won't be any money for the programs that Arianna wants, we're going broke. Morning in America is now High Noon with debt, deindustrialization and the defrocked demagoguery of defaulted civil rights and a debased currency.

The Oligarchy and their minions in the Democratic Party and the main stream media will find new red herrings to tout as the economy implodes and the new Great Depression takes hold.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: eagan Started This Mess ... Posted by: crazy carlos
Huffington's piece
Posted by: frederick on May 22, 2008 3:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
for me is pure garbage festering in the hatemonger's swamp of negativity and darkness. I'm no fan of the administration, but not because it reeks a right-wing stench. Rather, it is because they have furthered the "progressive" cause of the 20th century since Theodore Roosevelt to destroy republican democracy in the name of messianic centralization of power in the executive branch. To me, all the emotion-laden hate-Bush and Cheney vitriol of these past years speaks volumes about the so-called progressives of the day who can't pull their heads out of the sand long enough to see that the abuses of this administration represent exactly what it is they want!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Frederick's rant Posted by: Gregory Kruse
» RE: Huffington's piece conflated Posted by: greenPuker
“Right” & “Left” are both FASCIST WRONG
Posted by: Mister_PsyOps on May 22, 2008 3:38 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"Since 9/11, the Right's fear-mongering has been relentless and revolting."

Huffington's argument is the usual toothless nonsense.

9/11 "war on terror" literally bought by America's corporate monopoly system is cooked on both sides of the political circus at a nation ruled by organized crime. That’s a sham better known as Fascism.

Firstly, the neo-con "right" is not new (neo) or "conservative" by any stretch of what the words mean. So in a world where the "right" is nowhere near what it claims, could the so-called "left" be far behind? Every criminal act produced by a temp surface BushCo regime was fully supported by what passes for the Washington-MSM "leftwing" from 9/11 cover-up to the genocidal Big Oil killing fields of Iraq.

The farce is on full display at "Huffington Post" where bloggers are constantly censored away or outright banned for daring to suggest the U.S. is not what Huffington and staff say it is.

If this is “democracy” it’s the snake oil brand Orwell predicted.

I might add Alternet has its own problem on the score of censoring and banning inconvenient facts and issues off the radar.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

right / left
Posted by: aogfc on May 22, 2008 3:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I agree with most of the criticisms of the "right" do not assume that ANY of the Democrats are anywhere to the "left". Until I hear anyone (except of course for Rep. Kucinich) talk of not for profit health care, nationalisation of our public resources, etc.. hell, I would be happy to start if we just a Union Member be head of the Dept. of Labor... I have a hard time playing this right/left game.... maybe Extreme right / Moderate right seems more accurate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: right / left Posted by: metryjen
Same difference
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 22, 2008 4:24 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article falls into the same dangerous thinking as the media and much of the population: It looks back on the so-called Reagan and Daddy Bush Republicans as different animals from the ones in power now.

The right keeps shifting the frame of reference, and everyone follows along, including the left. When lefties talk about Reagan and Daddy Bush as kinder, gentler, more sane Republicans who played nice with others, you know the plan is working. You'll see examples of this elsewhere in the "liberal media", including PBS.

Years from now, I suppose there will be an article like this when the Coulter Administration is torturing grandmothers, orphans, and 3-legged puppies for breathing on Sunday: "The respectable Right of Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld has been hijacked by a bunch of loonies..."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Same difference Posted by: loxias
» RE: Same difference Posted by: badkitty
» RE: Same difference except.. Posted by: greenPuker
» RE: Same difference Posted by: bobtr900
» RE: Same difference Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Same difference Posted by: HoboHomo
» RE: Same difference Posted by: HoboHomo
Thank-You
Posted by: nicolemaschke on May 22, 2008 4:25 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank-You so much... your article this morning, while being what I have always loved about you and your writing, (I guess a bit selfishly, for when my hands worked better, your writing is a lot like what I have always aspired to).

Thank-you... your words are making a very tough day for me ... a whole lot easier. I really appreciate that. From one who is now so small, to someone who is truly so large... Thank-You so much...

Happy Trails... Godspeed... Pay It Forward...

Nicole "Mickey" Maschke

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

On and on
Posted by: Razst on May 22, 2008 4:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Today the New York Times speaking of prisoner abuse says "In light of a report by the Justice Department, the Democrats in charge of Congress should press for full disclosure of President Bush’s inhuman policy on prisoners." Arianna speaks about the hijacking of the country by right wing lunatics. It's as if once the facts are known we're all gonna run out and put things straight. I've been reading multiple blogs every day for years now. The facts are all out on the table for all to see and have been for a long time. But nothing changes. Criminals, zionists, and bigots have occupied and taken possession of this land, and they're not going to release their grip without a fight. Lets get real people, Barack Obama and the Democrats are not going to rescue us. They're all complicit and by their silence have supported the coup. Either each one of us is willing to go out in the streets to take back our country just like the Iraqis are doing in theirs, or we should just shut up and move on to another subject that can be solved in front of a keyboard.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: On and on and mush Posted by: greenPuker
The party of Abraham Lincoln?
Posted by: Tom Degan on May 22, 2008 4:48 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They used to call it "the party of Lincoln". But that is so obviously no longer the case, their most blatant propagandists don't even try to use that language anymore. Let's face it: the GOP has been overtaken by a cabal of kooks, criminals and fools.

They have cut the throats of the poor and the middle class.

They have looter our national treasure.

They have abandoned their constituancy in favor of a multi-national corporate behemoth and an out-of-control military industrial complex.

They have created a global, geo-political catastrophe in the Middle East that will take at least a century to remedy.

They have shoveled a generation of American children into an untenable slaughterhouse in Iraq.

They have engendered an economic nightmare so immense that generations yet unborn will still be bearing its burden.

They have sold our nation's soul to the highest corporate bidder.

They have made a mockery of the First Ammendment.

They have squandered a five trillion dollar surplus with a tax cut for a class of people who already had more money than they knew what to do with.

They have gutted vital social programs that aid the poor and elderly which have been in place for over seventy years.

They have turned federal emergency management into a sick joke.

They have knocked the teeth out of laws meant to protect working men and women.

They have plundered the environment.

They have depleated our educational system

They have hijacked this nation's politcal dialogue.

They have ruined our international reputation.

They have handed our domestic agenda over to religious fantatics.

They have denied voting rights to people of color in three states.

They have stolen two national elections.

They have trampled on our constitution.

They have sent our Bill of Rights through the sausage grinder.

They must never, ever be allowed to govern this country again.

The grand old party is over.

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY

PS: Oh, and by the way, THEY'RE SOOOO DUMB!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» And in the Peoples Republic of New York State? Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» RE: The party of Abraham Lincoln? Posted by: carbon-based
» Wait, there's more... Posted by: surfreality
Stop slandering "lunatics"
Posted by: darbypenney on May 22, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A very insightful critique of the extreme right - but please stop equating "badness" with "madness"! Those of us in the Mad Pride movement do not want to be likened to those hate-driven evil-doers of the right!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» GREAT POINT! Posted by: Tom Degan
Arianna Huffington - money before objectivity
Posted by: carbon-based on May 22, 2008 5:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What can I say.. my favorite topic...Arianna Huffington!!!

The money sucking witch who took millions from her husband.. is so left wing to be on a fringe herself and she is writing an article complaining about her competition???

In this list of "fringe" lunatics she forgot to include .. the entire NBC and MSNBC reporting staff and best of all.... herself! But that may be her problem..shes not on anyones list!!!!

Judging by Huffington's past in being focused on others money and how to get it for herself, I'm sure the fact that ALL those "rightwing" fringe people she mentioned make more than she does, doesnt sit well with her!

As for being on the political "fringe" - look at what the democrats have to offer - the worst congressional rating EVER..worse than Bush's current rating. We're still in Iraq..a weak spineless group that can do nothing more than cry about Bush and how he isnt letting them play.

Seems the swamp just filled up instead of being drained - poor Pelosi!

The truth is that our entire congress is on the political dark side..everyone is out for themselves, no one has a handle on the big picture or the problems in this country and we are in for more of the same regardless of who gets elected.. THAT point seems to be missed by our esteemed Ms.Huffington.

But then, non of that matters to her, she seems a bit miffed that all these "fringe media" personalities are getting attention and she sitting on the side lines! Where's her TV show?????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Still, not enough emphasis on the root cause, clean elections!
Posted by: yale on May 22, 2008 5:14 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The bastards will be in power until we can oversee our elections. With Huffingtons profile of the repugs its hard to believe they have a chance in hell, but they do! WAKE THE F UP America! The solution is so simple, its ridiculous.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George W. Bush is a Spoiled Rich Kid
Posted by: US Citizen on May 22, 2008 5:32 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
George W. Bush is a spoiled rich kid who just likes to blow things up, whether it is Iraq or if it is any meaningful improvements in the United States. Lots of damage so far, more on the way. The United States had this kind of destruction in the Twenties. Then it was Warren G. Harding, the ex-President George W. Bush most resembles, doing the damage. We were saved later by Franklin Roosevelt then, but I'm not so sure we will be saved this time. around.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» teapot Posted by: pariter
Wrong and not right
Posted by: Dennis Hogan on May 22, 2008 5:45 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Your "Right Is Wrong" commentary is clear and I think on target. Your reasons for dropping out of the Republican party most likely stem from the fact that you have intelligence and your moral compass still works. You had not been blinded by the Republican dogma of the current crop of party leaders. Good for you.

The most troubling thing you spot light is the role the mainstream media is playing in "playing it safe" down the middle of all issues. It is just killing us and our practice of democracy. The role of informed and courageous reporters and journalists cannot be under-estimated for the well being of our democracy. We have been let down at an increasing rate these past twenty five years.

Thanks for your insights....keep your courage up and your voice loud. We need you.

Dennis Hogan
Austin, TX

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ugh
Posted by: ericthefool on May 22, 2008 5:51 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
LEFT-RIGHT PARADIGM!!!

I agree that the GOP has been hijacked, because I am a republican and the Neo-cons in power are NOT republicans.

But 'Democrats' and 'Republicans' are dividing this country as if all of our beliefs can be categorized under two parties.

Ever read Sun Tzu's Art of War...it's called Divide and Conquer!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You must be from the Rockafella Flavor? Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» RE: You must be an ass Posted by: Lauren
» You must be a moonbat Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» ship me off to Kentucky Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» RE: You must be a moonbat Posted by: HoboHomo
American Idol
Posted by: newsound on May 22, 2008 5:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The population has been chiselled down to a mindless apathetic congregation. We are all affected by a corporate media of which has created this American Idol mentality that defines our social and political system. Until we can:

Give up our addiction to oil,
Get involved instead of turning away,
Disavow religion and,
Re-learn to think for ourselves,
Throw our TVs (and cable boxes) in the garbage and therefore,
Re-learn how to enjoy life,

nothing will change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But the Democrats have been enabling, make that EMPOWERING, the rightwing lunatics for 28 years !!!!
Posted by: maxpayne on May 22, 2008 5:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If you want to blame the GOP, no problem. But don't forget to include the accomplices because that's who we're gonna have to PURGE if we're gonna win !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The GOP
Posted by: bobtr900 on May 22, 2008 6:00 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The GOP is now a dark, putrefied party of... And DO NOT forget the Theocons and their brethren the Neocons.

The GOP did not do this alone they had lots of help from other corrupting influences. That the GOP is at the very center of this, there is no doubt. That Bush, Cheney, Rove, Coulter, Limpbraugh, Rice, Powell, Gonzales and Rumsfeld are at the center of the GOP, of that there is no doubt. But they too have had lots of help from other corrupt influences including Scalia etc, O'Reilly etc, Russert etc, and the religious fundies like evangelical fundies and Catholic fundies, of that there is no doubt.

All of the above are fully and totally complicit in their conspiracy, their cabal of horrors, of that there should be no doubt. Everyone of the above bears full responsibility for what has happened and the 'Culture of Death' they have created, of that, let there be no doubt in anyones mind.

Thats why I advocate that each of these people get 100 emails everyday to remind them that we know what they did and are watching them. They need to be reminded everyday that they have stepped way far over the line of reality. They need to have the inexorable drip- drip- drip- of a kind of Chinese water torture tatoo on their daily existence and in at least that way they will know that we have not forgotten their perfidy nor their sins against the American people, the 241 million of us who did not vote for Bush, and their sins against the entire 'Family of Man'. Their 'Culture of Death and Torture' is a foul evil deed that besmirchs us all collectively and individually.

Should we not, collectively, stand up against them now, one day when they come for us there will be no one left to stand up for each one of us. Their Nazi Fascist Holocaustian tactics deserve an equal response. For at this very time they are preparing McCain to continue that which George Bush said: 'what I began is unstoppable'. I can't source his exact words, just Google up the source and his exact words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The GOP Posted by: Lauren
Bush and Cheney KNOW they are legally vulnerable to prosecution,
Posted by: Last Chance on May 22, 2008 6:10 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so what can they do to save themselves from such an unbearable humiliation? Simple, find an excuse to bomb Iran and launch World War Three, then, as Rev. Hagee has assured Bush, Jesus will return according to the Book of Revelations and sweep the Earth clean of all but devout Christians and create for them a paradise on Earth (!) - anytime between now and November or January!
Is there any other way to stop them besides impeachment?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you are too late: dose GWOT ring a bell Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» wrong answer Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» Think beyond the propaganda - Posted by: Last Chance
Still Looking
Posted by: South42 on May 22, 2008 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am a former republican looking for a new group to ally with.

The problem is that the democrats are no better than the republicans. Both parties have thrown out the Constitution and have just decided we no longer have the "rule of law" that you would have in a Constitutional Republic, but have deteriorated to "mob rule" that you find in a democracy.

Let’s use the current healthcare discussion as an example. While you can make a case for either side of the discussion, nowhere have I seen anyone mention that you would need a constitutional amendment to give the government jurisdiction over the area of healthcare, thus giving them the authority to pass laws regarding healthcare. Both parties are going to pass whatever they want, damn what the Constitution says. Remember whatever they give you on a whim can be taken away on a whim and that is how you are controlled.

Where do I get this novel idea that you need an amendment? Why Federalist 84 of course. From Wikipedia;

Federalist No. 84 is notable for presenting the idea that a Bill of Rights was not a necessary component of the proposed United States Constitution. The Constitution, as originally written, did not specifically enumerate or protect the rights of the people. It is alleged that many Americans at the time opposed the inclusion of a bill of rights: if such a bill were created, they feared, this might later be interpreted as a list of the only rights that people had. Hamilton wrote:

It has been several times truly remarked, that bills of rights are in their origin, stipulations between kings and their subjects, abridgments of prerogative in favor of privilege, reservations of rights not surrendered to the prince. Such was Magna Carta, obtained by the Barons, sword in hand, from king John...It is evident, therefore, that according to their primitive signification, they have no application to constitutions professedly founded upon the power of the people, and executed by their immediate representatives and servants. Here, in strictness, the people surrender nothing, and as they retain every thing, they have no need of particular reservations. "We the people of the United States, to secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this constitution for the United States of America." Here is a better recognition of popular rights than volumes of those aphorisms which make the principal figure in several of our state bills of rights, and which would sound much better in a treatise of ethics than in a constitution of government....

I go further, and affirm that bills of rights, in the sense and in the extent in which they are contended for, are not only unnecessary in the proposed constitution, but would even be dangerous. They would contain various exceptions to powers which are not granted; and on this very account, would afford a colorable pretext to claim more than were granted. For why declare that things shall not be done which there is no power to do? Why for instance, should it be said, that the liberty of the press shall not be restrained, when no power is given by which restrictions may be imposed? I will not contend that such a provision would confer a regulating power; but it is evident that it would furnish, to men disposed to usurp, a plausible pretense for claiming that power.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You'll be back Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» RE: You'll be back Posted by: Lauren
» You dont have the monopoly Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» RE: You'll be back Posted by: emmas
» RE: Still Looking Posted by: Lauren
» RE: Still Looking Posted by: badkitty
Huffington is a Caricature
Posted by: Gravitas on May 22, 2008 6:30 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While I certainly agree with everythig she says about the right, the left is fringing out too. May I remind her that HuffingtonPost had an article about why the public should not cash their rebate checks??? Way to attract people to the progressive cause!!! Make them feel guilty about feeding their kids!!! Maybe the left should stop bashing the right (well, maybe a little bashing cause it is so irresistable!) and start focusing on how to appeal to the public. After all, the reasons all the folks in the above article are popular is because they connected with the public. Calling them morons, while absolutely correct, is not going to win converts. How and why did they touch people and how can we reframe the message??? Otherwise, Huggington is just as much a limousine liberal as Limbaugh is of a bag of hot air!!!

p.s. I am going to repost a link to a tongue and cheek blog I wrote about all the extreme suggestions I have read here on alternet called Lose the Lemon, Chuck Your Check... No wonder the average joe listens to the right!
http://tinyurl.com/6h39ab

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marie in Tx
Posted by: marie.vorrath on May 22, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got off the Huff post so I wouldn't have to read Huffintons slanted some just plain untrue posts now here she is on this forum. I didn't read her and don't intend to, so if Alter Net considers this an attack so be it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» The AlterNet has "Honest Liberals" Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» Texas, Utah, AZ, NM Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» RE: Texas, Utah, AZ, NM Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: Marie in Tx Posted by: loxias
» RE: Marie in Tx by loxias Posted by: marie.vorrath
What The (Bleep) You "Liberals" Really Want Out of America?
Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters on May 22, 2008 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arianna Huffington Reminds me of the villain in those Get Smart TV shows with her voice and well now she sounds like the villain for the rest of America however what do I know, I'm just a peanut brain conservative however I'm also a Northeast Dweller so I must live among you people: Liberals of all shades and this is were I ask: What The (Bleep) You People Really Want Out of America?

...well in a nutshell.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Bobby Jindal is the Future Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
Lee Atwater
Posted by: smadaj on May 22, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Great article - no surprise, considering the source.

Karl Rove Did NOT learn anything from Lee Atwater that he didn't want to learn. Rove didn't pay any attention to Atwater's final understanding of the destruction he had wrought.

In a February 1991 article for Life Magazine, Lee Atwater, dying from a brain tumor, wrote:

"My illness helped me to see that what was missing in society is what was missing in me: a little heart, a lot of brotherhood. The '80s were about acquiring -- acquiring wealth, power, prestige. I know. I acquired more wealth, power, and prestige than most. But you can acquire all you want and still feel empty. What power wouldn't I trade for a little more time with my family? What price wouldn't I pay for an evening with friends? It took a deadly illness to put me eye to eye with that truth, but it is a truth that the country, caught up in its ruthless ambitions and moral decay, can learn on my dime. I don't know who will lead us through the '90s, but they must be made to speak to this spiritual vacuum at the heart of American society, this tumor of the soul."

Wikipedia says: Atwater was a trusted advisor of U.S. Presidents Ronald Reagan and George H. W. Bush. He was also a political mentor and close friend of Karl Rove. Atwater invented or improved upon many of the techniques of modern electoral politics, including promulgating reputation-destroying rumors. His opponents have characterized him as the "happy hatchet man" and "the Darth Vader of the Republican party."

I was in the ICU at GW Hospital when the Lee Atwater was very ill, and I heard him crying for his mother. At the time I did not know he had repudiated his destructive win tactics, and I was amazed at the irony of such a powerful man dying such a powerless death. I don't know if his repudiation was based on real understanding or on fear of the unknown, but Karl Rove certainly never took those last words of his friends' to heart.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Start With The Nazis
Posted by: TarryFaster on May 22, 2008 7:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
For a summary of who has been attempting -- since before FDR -- to take over our country: Click here.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ode to Bush
Posted by: kackermann on May 22, 2008 7:53 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
His hatred of things decent
His crimes of most recent
His hand of death dealing
His life breath stealing
His theft of our nation
His mental vacation
His vetoing hope
His begging for rope
His embarrassing stupidity
His lack of lucidity
His clan of red morons
His plans of more war bombs
His chin to balls game he
His suck a dick Cheney
His space he takes up
His parents fucked up
His pretend friends of Jesus
His pretzels near pleased us
His flaccid pink dink
His rear-end stink
His hollow sold soul
His conscience corpse cold
His noxious breath breathes
His throne he soon leaves
His love of love hater
His catching us later
His wormy brain squirms
His howls, hell burns

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

But we're all Americans
Posted by: JohnJlws on May 22, 2008 7:54 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was a republican (sort of) until Obama. A lot of the “lunatic fringe” and what they were doing and saying made me cringe, but the area of the country where I live had limited options, if you wanted any voice. We are so republican that there are often not local democratic candidates. Obama changed all that. I went to the county democratic convention as a precinct Obama delegate.

Wow! This thing went from 9 a.m. to after 7 p.m. (I left). It was simply phenomenal in terms of discussion, debate, inclusion and, yes, chaos. I make fun of the republican county convention I went to. The republicans go in pray, say the Pledge of Allegiance, pray some more and then nominate the old white guy. It’s very clean, very together, and except for photo-ops extremely exclusionary.

This year, when I watched the first debates, I was struck by how all the “I wannabe Reagan” republican candidates looked exactly the same and sounded exactly the same. It was like the Stepford Wives with dicks.

All of that to say the following. Being a “democrat” or being a “republican” doesn’t make someone right or wrong. If we blindly support candidates because they profess to be “democrat” or “republican” where else are the opposition candidates to garner financial and resource support except to the fringes of the party? If we blindly support “the democrat” because we’ve allowed (and it is our fault that GW is where he is) Rove, Limbaugh, Coulter (any of the three just makes you feel like you need a shower, don’t they) and the other goofs to take over, is this the best decision for America, and, if not, isn’t that what this process is supposed to be about?

I went to a local democratic function the other night. As a precinct chair nominee I introduced myself and told folks I had been a republican (truth is the only republican at the national level I ever voted for was Ford and I worked for Hart during his first run). I was struck as others introduced themselves and there were a couple who echoed the same venom toward republicans I had heard from republicans toward democrats.

Some of us have lost sight of the fact that we are not republicans, democrats, independents and stupids (those who don’t participate); we’re Americans. During this thing that night a person said “we need to find a candidate to beat a “local republican.’”

That “local republican” is one of the finest people I know. We disagree on a lot of things, but I can sit and present a case to him (or her) and more often than not we come to some understanding and more often than not he offers me support. This person is a senior member of our state elected delegation and brings great things to our region. He’s not part of the “lunatic fringe,” but where will he turn for support, if I, a “democrat,” do not support him only because he's a "republican?" We’re going to change because he is conservative and has “republican” in front of his name and therefore probably is more supportive of the republican agenda. Is that a good decision-making process to determine what’s best for our slice of America?

Obama is an exciting candidate because he is able to look at a problem through the paradigm of liberalism, but isn’t constrained to exclusivity by that view. I would respectfully offer that the rest of us could learn something from Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: But we're all Americans Posted by: kackermann
» RE: But we're all Americans Posted by: JohnJlws
» But who Would be Willing to Burn Union Jack? Posted by: TheJibreelaMonsters
» RE: But we're all Americans Posted by: Lauren
» RE: But we're all Americans Posted by: JohnJlws
» Thank You Posted by: LeslieGem
Ms Huffington, agent of change
Posted by: larry278 on May 22, 2008 7:56 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
While Ms Huffington may not have been the 1st MSM person to use the term 'nea-con' & may not have coined the term, her use of nea-con as a pejorative term for rabidly radical, reactionary, right wingnut Republicans formerly know as neo-cons will encourage progressives to use the pejorative term, nea-con, when writing or speaking of the atavistic antics of so called neo-cons. Ms Huffington is a taste maker. HUFFINGTON POST has become a influential progressive voice in the MSM. She & her backers planned that when they started HP.
Ms Huffington is guilty of being a humanist & a progressive. She is a skilled advocate for the causes which she embraces. While English isn't her native tongue, she uses English with a facility which we who love the English language respect & envy. Some would say that she is also a voice for Christianity despite her 21st century way of living. A single-parent would do well to emulate Ms Huffington.
To be trite she promotes an approach to politics & life based upon that uncommon quality of using common sense. Nea-con trolls particulary hate that part of Ms Huffington, the taste maker, as we can see by the nea-con's prior comments on her words.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Neanderthals would be progressive democrats had they survived
Posted by: Gregory Kruse on May 22, 2008 8:05 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is unfair to compare Neanderthals to the conservative lunatic fringe. I'm sure Arianna has little time to watch the Discovery Channel, so she didn't see the one about the debunking of the Neanderthal myth. They were actually quite peaceful and intelligent. The only thing that doomed them was a development in us, their cousins, of the post-nasal area which led to our ability to develop spoken language. This gave us a great advantage over them and we all know what happens when humans gain an advantage. (It's not just us.) The big question now is, can we as a species rise above the rules of the world without destroying the world. Progressives want to do this; the conservatives like things the way they are.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

political ping pong
Posted by: sirios on May 22, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
citiing and accusing the the opposite and then instilling your point of view, enacting laws to protect that tenet, because there is an under lying fear that it can't exist on it's own,is one of the oldest and most popular games on earth. has consensual correction of the opposite , ever held up over time? is it possible that the authors of the constitution recognized that humans cannot be self regulated if they see themselves as seperate from others? do we really believe that even the most compassionate leader will not succumb to power and adoration? why then do we endlessly pursue the opposite of what is not working in govt. and our lives in hopes that this time it will work? there are very few gray areas left for solutions. ie: physically leaving an enviroment that does suit our point of view. has the world become so black and white, that the only solution in politics and our individual lives is to recognize that we as the unified field not just as individuals are the solution. we as infinite compassion are the missing link, the hidden treasure is fully exposed, lets recognize that we are in possession of that which would calm even the most hated enemy, the only obstacle is the belief that there is any obstacle.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Oh Arianna you'resuch a genuis..
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 22, 2008 8:13 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I was battling the far right when you were in it right up to your ass Arianna..!

I hardly need a book by you, to know what you didn't realize or learn or admit too, until recently..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Oh Arianna you're such a genuis.. Posted by: TJ-stars4peace
Milton Freidman and his buddies are to blame
Posted by: warble on May 22, 2008 8:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
"A key to understanding the fanatical Right's takeover of the Republican Party and how these ideas spread to the rest of the country ...

This man's doctrine is spelled out in THE SHOCK DOCTRINE by Naomi Klein. His ideas are the those of the zionists where rape of all nations and the takeover of all that is private property is legitimate. How could any bank President or Corporation fail to recognize the genius of this man? How could the corrupt agents of the Republican Party not sell out our country and Franklin Roosevelt and begin the rape of the American people? Let's face it! We were all screwed and it was done by all those bas..rds in congress on the take. The military and the Media turned a blind eye and thanked them. So much for checks and balances and right and wrong. The crusade against the Islamic world is a vehicle to rob all of us. God Bless America. You all deserve it.
You screwed the Indians and did nothing
You screwed the blacks and did nothing
you screwed the immigrant and did nothing
and now you are being screwed...so what can you do? Nothing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Friedman Posted by: meetmeineleusis
Change, Step One 100% Public Campaign Financing
Posted by: peacekeepertwo on May 22, 2008 8:18 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason why we see politicians, Who all appear be to various shades of the same Color,is the system will only support Two Parties. If you Have 100% Public Campaign financing, than A Green party candidate, or annyone else who decides run for Office, can at least have a chance. the cost of air Time, and travel makes Running for Office very difficult. We are all tempted By power and greed,we need to have a road block, that gives a chance to think about what we are Doing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Right is Hawkish
Posted by: bandofotters on May 22, 2008 8:21 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
RE: "And just look who the GOP settled on as its 2008 standard-bearer: the most hawkish candidate in the running,"

I thought that the column was titled, "Right is Wrong". Why are you muddling your premise? McCane was certainly not the Right-most candidate. In fact, isn't he left of center on many issues like immigration and campaign finance reform?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: ight is Hawkish Posted by: Ellen Remore
Democracy has to be relearned by each new generation.
Posted by: Sojourner on May 22, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plato told us 2500 years ago that the weakness of democracy is people will sell out. Leaders can buy their votes.

When Walter Mondale in 1984 said that he was going to raise taxes, the voters told him he was crazy and returned Reagan for a second term to continue his private war in Central America and his sale of missiles to Iran to fund it.

During my lifetime, we depended on the media to expose the abuse of government. But the abusers became more proficient at buying off the media, which proved to be less expensive than buying off the voters and more effective.

Media is a business. Even public media. Look at the ads on PBS. Look at who gets air time. Arianna is correct: balance has come to mean having one sensible commentary nullified by one lunatic commentary.

Moyers was forced off of PBS but has finally returned. That typifies what we have gone through in the last 30 years. That is a long time to give away our public assets to private greed. It will take a long time to get back on track.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Another Republican turncoat
Posted by: HughScott on May 22, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm a lifelong registered Republican (since 1956) who switched sides in 1988 because Big Daddy Bush's "New World Order" sounded fascist to me.

So why am I still in the GOP? Three reasons:

1. My home state, California, has a closed primary election which doesn't allow independents (my true political bent) to participate.

2. I get to vote against Republican presidential candidates TWICE every four years. For example, in 2004 I made "Mickey Mouse" the write-in candidate below Bush 43 on my GOP primary ballot.

3. I'm on the RNC's email list and receive all their propoganda which shows how dishonest the Party has become and how stupid their Kool Aid drinking members are.

Finally, this year I will vote for the most inspirational leader I have seen since 1956 -- Barack Obama.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

George W. Bush is a Criminally Bad President
Posted by: US Citizen on May 22, 2008 8:52 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is something new in American history, a President who is criminally bad for our country, and will need to be prosecuted for all the damage that has occurred. The United States in the early 1920's was faced with a similar situation but in that case the really bad president, Warren G. Harding, died. Elected by fraud, George W. Bush gleefully set about destroying the United States and has well succeeded.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I agree wholeheartedly, but....
Posted by: Col. Jackleg on May 22, 2008 9:19 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
There can be no defense or endorsement of the Republican party since Reagan and the Bush-2 version should represent its bottom....but does it? In 2004, despite overwhelming national discontent, Bush garnered an outrageously large vote that carried many congressional cohorts back to their havens. In 2006, the anti-Bush outcry was even greater but the mid-term outcome failed to produce what it should have done and a rollover Democrat(s) majority became feckless. As we approach the 2008 opportunity for change, I wonder if the nearly 55 millions that voted for Bush in 2004 will turn to presumptive nominee Obama and away from McCain. Not! The same rhetoric, spin, fear-mongering and criminality abounds and the hate it breeds shows no sign of a major breakdown. I foresee a very close election with another marginally divided Congress and business as usual. Think not? Look at the committee hearings. Listen to Bush swagger his way about his realm pontificating as though he is the Messiah. When, pray to someone, will any Democrat stand tall and label this entire crowd the felons that they are and demand their prosecution. Only then will there be significant change but, there is no consensus to make it happen and the minions are embroiled with the recession, valueless dollar, homelessness and despair that still won't effect meaningful change. Obama has yet to lance the wounds and bleed the infection to healing. McCain is a mere dingleberry and the media have disappeared from relevance. Not a happy prospect good citizens. You wave the flag and pledge allegiance, I'm with Rev. Wright...goddam America!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

As Michael Gerson say
Posted by: bobtr900 on May 22, 2008 10:13 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That the party(GOP) is in a funk could be a good thing or a bad thing. If the end effect is that they are dispirited and directionless then to some extent their foul evil deeds are blunted and impotent. If the end effect is that they are like a blind bull thrashing around in the 'China Shop' of our democracy then we should expect further destruction from that thrashing beast.

Hopefully the GOP and their Theocons and Neocons will thrash themselves right into the hell they have created. And may they take their Fascist-Nazi ways with them.

The world had one Holocaust, wasn't that enough. Are we going to stand around and let them perpetrate another. If we do not offer some resistance, some blow-back, they'll do it again under the guise of business profits. No matter what they call it or how they rationalize it killing is still killing, be it people or our democracy. Of course killing people is the worst of the two.

As to Arianna's comment about it taking place not in the telecoms and oil companies, is where she is wrong. The telecoms(media consolidation= profits) and big oil(ever more profits) are every bit behind and a part of this cabal of horrors. It is equally and fully of their own making. The top tier, and mostly the top tier, of US multinational corporations have in conspiracy(oh, I forgot we aren't allowed to use that word conspiracy; so call it collusion, same thing) with the Repub party, which pimps for them, and pretty much only the top tier(can small 'mom and pop' business afford lobbyists) of business, is very much behind this Fascism that has taken over our country. And, I doubt very much that they are done engaging in these Fascist tactics. Only when the American people make their outrage known will they stop and then only for awhile.

They will never stop completely, it is part of their mindset to squeeze out every dollar(they call it efficiency) they can by manipulating our government. The Republican party is the most susceptable to this but the Dems do it also. Their worship of money and profits is never ending, and it trumps any small set of ethics or human values they may have. Ruthless top tier multinational business runs this country.

Right wing religion is their enabler, albeit indirectly, by enabling the Republican party. Together they form the perfect weapon against what is left of our democracy. Very likely, that is what Rove meant about putting into place a kind of Third Reich(my words, his meaning). Bush said something to the effect that what he(George Bush) has put into play cannot be stopped.

So good luck to us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: As Michael Gerson say Posted by: Lauren
George Bush
Posted by: bettyn on May 22, 2008 11:16 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Started out by blowing up frogs with firecrackers, ends by blowing up our country (and several others) just for his own amusement.

There's just NO WAY this silly, sadistic rich brat could have ever been elected President without the duplicity of the corporatocracy, the crookedness of our elections officials, and the stupidity of the Holy Rollers!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: George Bush Posted by: Ellen Remore
» RE: George Bush Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: George Bush Posted by: Lauren
» RE: George Bush Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
The Manufactured Left...
Posted by: TJ-stars4peace on May 22, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
All too often the far right which holds so much power selects and manufactures their own "left"..

It's the Manufactured Left which is the secular opiate so to speak that distracts what could other wise be a threat to their power base..

Arianna recently purged many of those with real solutions to these problems and crisis we face...

Also anyone who had been "impolite" to Bill O'Reilly and also Karl Rove who dared to submit articles to Huffington post.. that were his typical lies and manipulations..

She refused to cover NSPD-51 and HSPD-20 and removed all references to these..even the links to them..

Arianna is a part of The Manufactured Left..she's willing to sacrifice much which is not hers to sacrifice for her own boundless unbridled immature need for attention..

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Worldwide polarization
Posted by: jearls on May 22, 2008 12:04 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This dangerous polarization is not limited to the US Republican Nea-coms, it is world wide. In all countries there are rightwing extremist power groups who parrot off the same lunatic rhetoric as the Bush gang. Last night I saw a TV interview with Spain's ex-president Aznar: it is incredible how he repeats the same lies and myths as Cheney even when the contrary evidence has had some coverage in the MSM. The whole process now is that of the 1920-1930's, the lunatic right no longer seeks any rationality for their world view, only to present their proclamation of a transcendental order -- which they are going to impose at any cost. And most of the opposition groups are following the same path of the Social Democrats in those days. Bodes ill for the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

America: a for-profit megaconglomerate
Posted by: Ellen Remore on May 22, 2008 12:35 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I must take issue with Ms. Huffington; this country hasn't been "hijacked." It's been bought and paid for by the plutocracy that's been turning its wheels for some time. Why, for instance, hasn't Congress, well aware as it surely is of the opposition to the Iraq war, gotten up from its collective ass and screamed about the war's blatant criminality? Easy. The longer the war goes on, the more lucrative their personal stock portfolios become. Why do we still have no social safety net for the increasing number of the deprived among us? Easy again. Most poor people don't vote. They're too busy trying to stay alive. So there's no percentage in helping them do it.

What devours most of our tax dollars, in fact, is the care and feeding of a military imperialism whose very existence eludes most of the taxpayers. Your hard-earned bucks and mine don't get flushed into a Defense budget, but a phantasmagorically bloated Offense budget. Therefore, to roughly paraphrase Voltaire, if there is no enemy, it is necessary to invent one. Which is why Osama bin Laden is still walking around loose. Defense contracts are the ultimate cash cows for the legislators who vote to hand them out.

The sad fact is that we are living in a Potemkin Republic, and the only means of retrieving our democracy is first, to reform the way our representatives are elected; and second, to prohibit lobbying. Totally. That way, we might actually go back to being citizens in a participatory sense, rather than mere sources of revenue, and at times, cannon fodder.

BTW, Ms. Huffington, the sainted Mr. Reagan was no walk in the spring rain, either. He was, in fact, a completely shameless butcher.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hitch hiked
Posted by: sirios on May 22, 2008 1:05 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
highjacked? This was more of a hitch hiking gone bad, most people know pretty early on if you've picked up a physcho. some have the balls to get rid of the bum at the next corner ,while others are to afraid to say anything,and still others would feel guilty and unpatriotic to show him the door. once the rider detects any of the above, the likely hood for abuse is all to easy.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: hitch hiked Posted by: Lauren
I thought She was the lunatic fringe
Posted by: robbie.seal on May 22, 2008 2:24 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The vomit that she posts on her site is pathetic. Atleast make it believable, Lady. How about how her ilk hijacked the Democratic Party? Elected a bunch of idiots who's only qualification was they said they would get us out of Iraq if they were elected... HELLO!!! We're still there!!! They talked about REPs spending, now they tack on their pet projects to the funding for the war they said they wouldn't fund. Legislative bribery and we put up with it. Thank Ms H. Look what your hard work has done for us. Nothing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

hooligan
Posted by: hooligan on May 22, 2008 2:41 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
bravo ..the truth..but again..journalism that comments and doesnt solve...or provoke or suggest the unthinkable ..that there are prosecutable crimes being perpetrated by polticians against those who cant defend themselves..why not suggest that the politicians need to stand trial for war crimes, crimes against humanity over iraq and racketeering over handing jobs to their cronies in the corporate sector, human rights abuses over americans in jails over a faulty plea bargaining system (take a low guilty plea,but lose innocence first, not last) and endemic racial bigotry throughout the education system..this article does an excellent job of articulation and, although further along, does a very poor job in substantive provocation towards a solution, which is what journalism is also about, still one of the best articles and most sensitive i have seen. i agree with the posts below that talk about the failings of both parties..john, hillary and obama will only make things worse though, because there is no american dream or objective that has any basis in reality whilst drugs guns and a philosophy of money for nothing pervade more than 20% of US society and america has the worlds largest prison population and addiction to "bling"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

NOT surprising Ari fails to mention the DLC
Posted by: Kimmy on May 22, 2008 2:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Being a Michigander, I know there is an element of the 'Dem' Party that has worked in unison with this 'Neo CON' doctrine.
Just like Hillary, Arianna is nothing more than a covert operative.She no Hillary ever revoked their membership. Hillary has proven this with every vote, every time she remained silent, everytime she failed to Provide the necessary OVERSIGHT while on the Armed Services and of course her behavior on th ecampaign trail using ovian tactics and Most Notably her proclamation of 'Obliterating iran'
As for Ari- her 'Post' is one which only scrapes the 'Acceptable' surface of All issues and not only censors but silences opiniions which goe anainst HER thoughts - don't dare speak honestly about NOW nor WallStreet.
Look down ladies your RED slips are showing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rn
Posted by: mnatra on May 22, 2008 7:03 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again Alter net wants to educate those who must have been in a cave the last 8 years.
We have heard this description many times before
here about the criminal Republican party fringe and so on on on ... ad nauseam
We tire of the same old rhetoric repeated in so many different ways about this hijacking. It is
true YES So now what?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Funny . . .
Posted by: luckypuck on May 22, 2008 11:07 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
. . . but surely Reagan begat "the dark, moldering, putrefied [Republican] party" and Newt Gingrich nursed it at his teat.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Arianna Huffington,will you marry me?
Posted by: mindtrvlr on May 23, 2008 1:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You are a very smart beautiful women and I always enjoy your columns and appearences. Keep up thr good work. The world needs people like to help get us all back on track. Cheers

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

m in tx
Posted by: marie.vorrath on May 23, 2008 6:34 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
On the cafferty file my husband would try to post something NOT in favor of Obama and it would be taken down immediately. So he posted one saying I like Obama its still up, then he posted one saying I DON'T like Obama and it was gone in a flash!!! Isn't that dishonest, biased. Cafferty has READ some really nasty ones about Hillary so its not what you write but who you write it about!!!!! What is CNN"S motto most trusted name in news. I am posting this on every blog I can find !!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hijacked?
Posted by: pdxstudent on May 23, 2008 5:21 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So self-congratulatory are we?

To say that the fringe-Right hijacked America is comparable to saying that a lone man mugged a whole crowd of people with a knife. The fringe-Right's words definitely have an edge to them, but that's all they have. There is something seriously wrong with a group of people who not only fall to this sort of thing, but who let others fall too. Their complaining is just decadent icing to this bloody cake.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GOP now that's funny. How bout CFR?
Posted by: itelecom on May 24, 2008 3:14 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
JFK knew it would be incredibly hard to actually abolish the fed,(plus he was not part of the Winsor blood line like bush and gore are!, nor was he in agreement with the new world order agenda, so they were going to kill him anyway along with robert and MLK). The "US crown" must stay in the family. By the way, the Winsors aren't english, they're german. They changed their names several times, germans who followed nazism, just like george bush senior's father did...thats right my friends. They're trying to make this country THE FOURTH REICH.

"I care not what puppet is placed on the throne of england to rule the empire. The man who controls britain's money supply controls the British Empire and I control the British money supply"
Nathen Mayer Rothschild 1777-1836

"The Rothschilds are now worth over 100 TRILLION dollars. But it is hard to say when someone actually OWNS nearly all the currency of every nation -- and holds their debt. The Rockefellers are worth about 10 trillion. These amounts are unfathomable by most. The object is control, and ever the noose grows tighter as they chip away at our republican foundations. Nothing short of revolution can free us from these thieves who lay claim to our land, property, labors, and our very lives. It starts with saying 'no' to funny money (credit, er, I mean, debt) and saying 'no' to every encroachment of our liberties. This is the war, and the battleground is you, me, and every person on the planet."
-- E Archer, NYC


Wall Street, Banks, and American Foreign Policy
by Murray N. Rothbard

http://www.lewrockwell.com/rothbard/rothbard66.html

RON PAUL 2008

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hi Arianna
Posted by: jc1234 on May 24, 2008 10:28 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I have tended to come to the conclusion Arianna that piss poor economic policies for decades with this federal reserve fiat currency system (1913) has made everything unstable. All the world's currencies are fiat and essentially make nations unstable. There is no known fiat currency that has survived, its rather amazing that such a blunder has lasted this long. I have a bunch of precious metals (physical form), wanna go with me to Amsterdam for a few years and get away from this crazed country....I need a time out from the corporatist takeover of nations with someone nice like you.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

too bad Rove doesnt have it yet
Posted by: whealeydj on May 25, 2008 5:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I regret to say I was glad Atwater got brain cancer and died young. If only the same could happen to Rove for pushing the Iraq invasion and occupation to win the elections of 2002 and 2004, I would again be gladdened by anothers suffering

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Huffington is a late convert
Posted by: whealeydj on May 25, 2008 6:01 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the GOP has gotten worse and worse since Goldwater ran in 1964. Nixon was horrible and Reagan worse and the Worst President ever led this nation to the brink of authoritarianism. To those who think Dems are as just as bad, Gore would never have appointed Alito and Roberts or launched a preemptive Iraq Inavasion and remained for 5-100 years, or shredded 9/10 of the Bill of Rights. Obama is clearly better than McCain and the more anti war democrats in Congress the better.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]