Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Inverted Totalitarianism: A New Way of Understanding How the U.S. Is Controlled

By Chalmers Johnson, Truthdig. Posted May 19, 2008.


A new book offers a controversial but ultimately convincing diagnosis of how the U.S. has succumbed to an unacknowledged totalitarian temptation.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Chalmers Johnson

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Reviewed: Democracy Incorporated by Sheldon S. Wolin (Princeton University Press, 2008)

It is not news that the United States is in great trouble. The pre-emptive war it launched against Iraq more than five years ago was and is a mistake of monumental proportions -- one that most Americans still fail to acknowledge. Instead they are arguing about whether we should push on to "victory" when even our own generals tell us that a military victory is today inconceivable. Our economy has been hollowed out by excessive military spending over many decades while our competitors have devoted themselves to investments in lucrative new industries that serve civilian needs. Our political system of checks and balances has been virtually destroyed by rampant cronyism and corruption in Washington, D.C., and by a two-term president who goes around crowing "I am the decider," a concept fundamentally hostile to our constitutional system. We have allowed our elections, the one nonnegotiable institution in a democracy, to be debased and hijacked -- as was the 2000 presidential election in Florida -- with scarcely any protest from the public or the self-proclaimed press guardians of the "Fourth Estate." We now engage in torture of defenseless prisoners although it defames and demoralizes our armed forces and intelligence agencies.

The problem is that there are too many things going wrong at the same time for anyone to have a broad understanding of the disaster that has overcome us and what, if anything, can be done to return our country to constitutional government and at least a degree of democracy. By now, there are hundreds of books on particular aspects of our situation -- the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, the bloated and unsupervised "defense" budgets, the imperial presidency and its contempt for our civil liberties, the widespread privatization of traditional governmental functions, and a political system in which no leader dares even to utter the words imperialism and militarism in public.

There are, however, a few attempts at more complex analyses of how we arrived at this sorry state. They include Naomi Klein, The Shock Doctrine: The Rise of Disaster Capitalism, on how "private" economic power now is almost coequal with legitimate political power; John W. Dean, Broken Government: How Republican Rule Destroyed the Legislative, Executive, and Judicial Branches, on the perversion of our main defenses against dictatorship and tyranny; Arianna Huffington, Right Is Wrong: How the Lunatic Fringe Hijacked America, Shredded the Constitution, and Made Us All Less Safe, on the manipulation of fear in our political life and the primary role played by the media; and Naomi Wolf, The End of America: Letter of Warning to a Young Patriot, on Ten Steps to Fascism and where we currently stand on this staircase. My own book, Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic, on militarism as an inescapable accompaniment of imperialism, also belongs to this genre.

We now have a new, comprehensive diagnosis of our failings as a democratic polity by one of our most seasoned and respected political philosophers. For well over two generations, Sheldon Wolin taught the history of political philosophy from Plato to the present to Berkeley and Princeton graduate students (including me; I took his seminars at Berkeley in the late 1950s, thus influencing my approach to political science ever since). He is the author of the prize-winning classic Politics and Vision (1960; expanded edition, 2006) and Tocqueville Between Two Worlds (2001), among many other works.

His new book, Democracy Incorporated: Managed Democracy and the Specter of Inverted Totalitarianism, is a devastating critique of the contemporary government of the United States -- including what has happened to it in recent years and what must be done if it is not to disappear into history along with its classic totalitarian predecessors: Fascist Italy, Nazi Germany and Bolshevik Russia. The hour is very late and the possibility that the American people might pay attention to what is wrong and take the difficult steps to avoid a national Gtterdmmerung are remote, but Wolin's is the best analysis of why the presidential election of 2008 probably will not do anything to mitigate our fate. This book demonstrates why political science, properly practiced, is the master social science.

Wolin's work is fully accessible. Understanding his argument does not depend on possessing any specialized knowledge, but it would still be wise to read him in short bursts and think about what he is saying before moving on. His analysis of the contemporary American crisis relies on a historical perspective going back to the original constitutional agreement of 1789 and includes particular attention to the advanced levels of social democracy attained during the New Deal and the contemporary mythology that the U.S., beginning during World War II, wields unprecedented world power.

Given this historical backdrop, Wolin introduces three new concepts to help analyze what we have lost as a nation. His master idea is "inverted totalitarianism," which is reinforced by two subordinate notions that accompany and promote it -- "managed democracy" and "Superpower," the latter always capitalized and used without a direct article. Until the reader gets used to this particular literary tic, the term Superpower can be confusing. The author uses it as if it were an independent agent, comparable to Superman or Spiderman, and one that is inherently incompatible with constitutional government and democracy.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: democracy inc., sheldon wolin, totalitarianism

Chalmers Johnson's latest book is Nemesis: The Last Days of the American Republic (Metropolitan Books, 2008), now available in a Holt Paperback. It is the third volume of his Blowback Trilogy.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The lesson of Ralph Nader?
Posted by: Sojourner on May 19, 2008 12:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What's the use of being right, if nobody is listening?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The lesson of Ralph Nader? Posted by: jmndodge
How about destroying the myth of a two party system?
Posted by: Bic Pentameter on May 19, 2008 1:26 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
One of the best suggestions was the re-invigorating of populist politics. It is amazing to me how many people seem to think that we have a two-party system of government when that is not at all the case. I even supported Ross Perot (for a while) just to hopefully break that notion.

When there are only two big players, both can see control just a few votes away. With even just three, no single organization could hope to wrest control for themselves. Italy has shown us the folly of having twenty parties and forming a goverernment (after the elections) comprised of something representing the diversity of opinion.

But there has to be something between two and twenty. In fact, three would do. Three to five big parties and a host of hopefuls would eventually solve most of our other problems.

We have what I consider to be a constipated process that engenders apathy and simplification of all issues. Voters are not much inclined to think any more compex than the slogan of the day. We can win the war, but can we win the peace? Who else hates that mentality?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» It's not a myth, it's a fact. Posted by: ProgressiveManiac
» Ross Perot Posted by: countingdaisies
The Real Debate: Is it Too Late for the United States?
Posted by: mmckinl on May 19, 2008 1:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Recovery to any semblance of democracy would require our institutions to do a 180 degree about face.

Is the Corporatocracy and the Military-Security Industrial Establishment about to give up their hold on Washington? Is the Main Stream Media about to start printing the truth? I'm with Chalmers, I don't see it.

With financial disaster looming the only question I might ask is what comes after. My curiosity is whether we, the United States will go out with a bang or a whimper, that is, will we implode into another Great Depression or will we explode and initiate wars that engulf the Middle East and then probably the entire world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Prerequisite To Better Politics...
Posted by: skizum on May 19, 2008 2:16 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Currently, politics is just the medium or theatre through which ‘the need to dominate’, one of the most base characteristics of human behavior, is played out. Most political systems have evolved towards the use of subtle but effective manipulation of rationale to achieve selfishly motivated results.

Socially benevolent political solutions might be possible one day if we start dealing foremost with the objective truth and reality about our own human behavior. Whereas, our human behavior can be described as the inherent characteristics of our human nature (see partial list here) as influenced by our experiences and nurture.

Every decision, communication, declaration and action in the world is influenced by human behavior, yet we as individuals know little of this subject and consequently, how to manage it. It’s actually quite ridiculous if you think about it…

We, as individual citizens (of the world), must start learning understand the fundamentals of our own human behavior and how we can satisfactorily fulfill our most basic human needs. It’s the simplest and most obvious answer. It means speaking power to truth not manipulative rationalizations. It means having the courage to acknowledge and own all of our faults; not creating excuses or finding fault in others. It means being open to understanding, telling and accepting the objective truth of who we are.

Is it possible for us to gain an understanding of ourselves, our relationships to each other and our relative purpose in the world based on a truly objective set of unifying principals that are more basic than religion, politics and local culture etc? If we could develop such a unifying set of principals, would that give us a reasonable basis from which to reevaluate our current political, religious, legal and social institutions. After all, there is nothing more fundamental to us all than being human and wanting to live a humane life.

Perhaps after this point it makes sense to focus on democracy, as a system that can help manage human behavior towards achieving a sustainable and peaceful society….but, only if we adhere to the objective truths of reality.

"Democracy is about the conditions that make it possible for ordinary people to better their lives by becoming political beings and by making power responsive to their hopes and needs." It depends on the existence of a demos -- a politically engaged and empowered citizenry," one that voted, deliberated, and occupied all branches of public office." - Wolin

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Ways to Fall Posted by: Mimi
These books are hysterical and overstate the case
Posted by: Bobsays on May 19, 2008 2:44 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Okay, okay - let's pour a highball and take stock of the situation. If all those books are to be believed, then the US is a vicious fascist state waging out-of-control war around the world. But that is not what I see. I see a US that is exhausted, and in dire need of re-invention as an economic system. But a fascist state? No.

Nothing right now is as bad as things were under the Democrats during the Vietnam war. Back then, when America's liberals were in power and pushing through their equal rights legisaltion and making 'war on poverty', they were carpet bombing Vietnam, using toxic chemical sprays on the country, and getting at times 800 GIs killed a week. We are nowhere near close to that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» You seem to forget... Posted by: bobtr900
We Are Witnessing the Unfolding of Globalization
Posted by: Persephone8 on May 19, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The Author writes:

"The problem is that there are too many things going wrong at the same time for anyone to have a broad understanding of the disaster that has overcome us and what, if anything, can be done to return our country to constitutional government and at least a degree of democracy. "


The Constitution, Bill of Rights, The Declaration of Independence
and our Unalienable Rights are the Supreme law of the land.

This idea that " we need to return our country to a constitutional
government OR AT LEAST A DEGREE of DEMOCRACY" is exactly the tragic issue.

The Constitution, Bill of Rights and our Unalienable rights are NON-
NEGOTIABLE. That IS the point.We are witnessing the betrayal of civil
liberties, sovereignty and individual and the rights of sovereign citizens around the world..

This is not a spectator sport. This is not random.

This attempt to amend, negotiate find loopholes in The Constitution and Bill of Rights is what is causing the attempt to destroy them.

In case you haven't noticed, fascists and totalitarians don't negotiate.

We are watching an orchesrated global effort to undermine sovereignty
and constitutional governments world wide. It is not random.

These people are not going to be a little bit fascist. They will not give us "a degree" of freedom if it is lost.
Look at the regimes of Hitler and Stalin if you have any question about where this is heading ,unless we reclaim what is ours- and
God given.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

If they succeed
Posted by: Last Chance on May 19, 2008 5:34 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the North American Union will be a borderless, corporate empire where the rich and well connected are in the news every day and the millions of desperately poor people are unseen and unheard, like Russia today, corporate fascism - that is, if Bush and his Reverend Armsgeddonite Hagee don't manage to launch World War Three first. The November elections look far away.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the constant demos
Posted by: callejero on May 19, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So, Wolin is the next Gibbons? The answer is simple but it requires work, like all things worthwhile. Now, we vote and wait for the next election to again play the lottery of politics that never really gets us the jackpot we so desperately desire.

What we need to do is KEEP CONTROL in OUR HANDS by letting the politicians know how we feel. We have got to stop using Pollsters and elections for this purpose.

I have proposed (and it's been knocked down without explanation by the elite foundations whose support I've sought) that we create a website that organizes our mandates and accurately conveys them to our officials. Please see The[peoples]lobbyist for details.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I must read this book
Posted by: sausage on May 19, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But of course, as author Susan Jacoby points out in her book The Age of American Unreason, I'm already predisposed to agree with Sheldon S. Wolin's thesis; those at the opposite end of the political spectrum will never crack the cover of this tome, therefore it will never change anyone's preconceived notions.

What is becoming increasingly clear to me, unstated in Chalmers Johnson's review, is that inverted totalitarinism is the child of the marketing/advertising (propaganda) industry. We can talk all we want about creating a new "demos" and reinventing democracy but if we do not get a handle on what constitutes free speech (i.e. political) and how it is different from marketing speech (i.e. propaganda) we will forever be trapped by the inverted totalitarian state.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I must read this book Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I must read this book Posted by: lessbread
» RE: I must read this book Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I must read this book Posted by: lessbread
» RE: I must read this book Posted by: Quannah
» RE: I must read this book Posted by: lessbread
I hope G.W.Bush killed the REpublican party and Imperialism
Posted by: warble on May 19, 2008 8:10 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The author argues ” Our political system of checks and balances” were undermined by cronyism. Actually, if cronyism and an unchecked congress could vote away our constitution, we never had any checks and balances and our schools and press were lying to us all the time. So what is new? The information pouring out of the press and the government seems to have been consistently questionable and the people did not care as long as the economy was singing.

The author also argues that ” The problem is that there are too many things going wrong at the same time” but perhaps they were always wrong and this war is only exacerbating the failure of this nation. I notice that Americans are paying for this war not only through taxes, social security and everything of value, but they are also paying for it at the gas tank and energy. America robbed the greatest oil fields in the world when it seized Iraq but for some reason or other, not explained by our media or our government, we are paying through the nose twice. Is it that the Iraqi Oil fields are not producing oil for America? But more importantly, does anyone care that we are robbing and perpetrating a crime against the Iraqi people and the Middle East?

The author also cites a variety of books from Naomi Klein on down but no one mentions the Milton Friedman gang of rapesters [Capitalism & Freedom] who destroyed the old system of economic checks and balances that were instituted during the Roosevelt years and went around the world undermining the old economic order. Fortunately, he states the premise of the Republican Party.The main objectives of managed democracy are to increase the profits of large corporations, dismantle the institutions of social democracy (Social Security, unions, welfare, public health services, public housing and so forth), and roll back the social and political ideals of the New Deal” In other words, with the Republicans, private wealth and corporations were king and Communism and socialism were thoroughly disgraced. Naomi Klein argues that everything is up for grabs now. The entire wealth of any nation could be sold to the highest bidder at an auction. All the oil wells and mines of the former USSR were sold to certain fat cats for $100, 000 rubles. That was cheaper than going to war. In Pennsylvania, the governor even wanted to sell the roads. I am sure if he could have gotten $50,000.00 for them, he would have been happy. Every public utility is now up for sale including the libraries, the prisons, the roads, the water systems, the electric systems etc. We don’t even own the rights to plant corn, seeds, etc. Everything is up for grabs. Next week, a utility will be charging us to breathe. A whole group of Robber Barons have stolen America and we are their slaves. George Bush leads that gang. And still people sing the praises of America and Democracy. This Democracy is Imperialism and the whole people are paying for their folly. We no longer own anything unless we pay the piper, Uncle Sam. At least before Bush and others, we could enjoy the blessings of clean water, safe streets, public libraries etc.

Let us understand what really happened to America? First, the government instituted a government wide blackout on information. Then it attacked and destroyed the World Trade Center. Finally, because it was cocky with success and joined at the hip with Israel, it flexed its superpower muscles and roared like an imperialistic bull throughout the world, because as the NEOCONS claimed, they would never get another chance to exercise their superpower muscles again. Beneath the surface, they made a grab for oil around the world and terminated the UN.
Perhaps, our poverty and our pain will wake us up. Rev. Wright tried to show us what was wrong. We shouted him down. Perhaps Wotan will get our attention.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It is greed and overpopulation that drives the empire
Posted by: leemiller38 on May 19, 2008 8:17 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
These are dimensions of the problem that are seldom mentioned in articles like this.

In 1492, Europeans found a new world chock full of natural resources and a relatively weak indigenous people who didn't have steel, the right germs, or guns. The rest is history.

Having bred like fertile rabbits in this new environment and having the cleverness and freedom to come up with all manner of energy and material consuming gadgets, and having squandered this windfall of resources, it has become necessary to destroy the rest of the planet in a similar manner to keep the capitalist monster going, but we are rapidly running out of planet too.

Dr. Paul Ehrlich tried to awaken the nation and world from its overpopulated state in the 60's, but apparently to no avail as evidenced by the Mother's Day recognition given to the parents of 18. They should be ostracized as social parriahs. We are still paving over farmland like there will be no tomorrow while waving the flag and praying to an imaginary friend who is allegedly looking out for us. However, The Collapse that is coming will get here - we just don't know which straw will do the job. I just hope it is not the military one with nuclear bombs destroying everything.

Here again is my favorite poem. It contains so much truth in so little space. Note the date. Our problems are certainly not new, but as old as the eroded hillsides of the Mediteranean.

Conservationist’s Lament
By Kenneth Boulding
In: Man’s Role in Changing the Face of the Earth, 1956
University of Chicago Press, p. 1087

The world is finite, resources are scarce,
Things are bad and will be worse.
Coal is burned and gas exploded,
Forests cut and soils eroded.
Wells are dry and air’s polluted,
Dust in blowing, trees uprooted,
Oil is going, ores depleted,
Drains receive what is excreted.
Land is sinking, seas are rising,
Man is far too enterprising,
Fire will rage with Man to fan it,
Soon we’ll have a plundered planet.
People breed like fertile rabbits,
People have disgusting habits.

Moral: The evolutionary plan went astray by evolving Man.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Great motivator...maybe
Posted by: sawdust on May 19, 2008 8:33 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This was very good, all the way around. Well written and nicely done. And it brought both the thinkers and the stinkers (Pour a highball? What planet are you on?)out of the woodwork.

But the sad comment near the end is the one we should start worrying about the most: the bulk of the people on both far ends of the spectrum will never read this stuff or pay it much heed. That tunnelvision is a large part of how we got into this mess in the first place.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Pessimist
Posted by: Grandma Crabby on May 19, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The corporations and big money folks have SO MUCH power now they are not going to give it up. No way.

The corporate big money folks control the media and therefore control the discussion and the minds of most. So they'll just produce another video news release that says everything is peachy.

It's too late folks. No election is going to restore the democracy we were all taught about in elementary school.

America was NEVER a perfect democracy by any stretch of the imagination. No amount of flags on the set of FOX news will change that.

Today, this country is SO FAR OFF course that there is no turning back without a huge fall and then a restructuring.

I think we need a second constitutional convention to rewrite and update our systems. The electoral college (and the entire presidential voting process) is a joke. Of course none of this is going to happen unless the USA falls completely into bankrupcy and anarchy in the streets. THEN, MAYBE something productive will be done. But until then, Sean Hannity's America is on and he's telling me the problem is those dirty liberals!


VideoProductionTips = Learn Internet Video

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Ho-hum - a book I probably won't bother to read.
Posted by: Walks-in-Storms on May 19, 2008 8:41 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I buy and read just about all the books like this one, all those having to do with current history and govermental affairs. But, frankly, I'm tiring of hearing what I started saying - and trying to warn concerning - in the late nineteen sixties. Where were all these supposed scholars and geniuses when I was writing voluminously about these very things, speaking in college classes, and every public forum I could find? Where were they when I published chapbooks and made video tapes for the American Lyceum concerning the savaging of civil rights by the government and agencies like the IRS? Where were they when in 1967 I went to war - literally (they did the shooting, of course) - with the military industrial complex coup d'etat, not only sending to congressmen, senators, television media, nationally-published magazines - everyone appropriately responsible I could think of - volumes (tape recordings, for instance) of proof of massive corruption and crime (including rape and extortion to commit rape) by federal officials? Where the hell were people like this guy when I was being shot and shot at (hit three times), run down by motor vehicles (six times) as I walked or rode my bicycle, burglarized (more than sixty times), and repeatedly mugged on account of my "whistle-blowing?" Where were these people? "Data mining" my records, probably. Maybe they even read my stuff. After all, the profit motive has come to be the ONLY motive in the Land of the Fee.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

American Political System Broken
Posted by: ibolyap on May 19, 2008 8:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When Bush stole the election from Gore that for me was a sign that the american political system was broken. Less than half of the eligible voters vote. The citizens are not engaged in the political process. It is certainly not a democratic system anymore. It is a corporate state. Everything for profit.
Look around. Only consumerism is promoted.
People are voting against self-interest because they think that they have control. They don't.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Official Ideology
Posted by: gogm on May 19, 2008 9:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The article states, "It has taken a long time, but under George W. Bush's administration the United States has finally achieved an official ideology of imperial expansion comparable to those of Nazi and Soviet totalitarianisms."

The real official ideology of the USA is Capitalism. The Republican Party and conservative Democrats such as Bill Clinton are its high priests. The mass media proclaim the word along with the politicians. Many classic religions are tolerated and promoted, so long as they do not clash with Capitalism, much as Japan tolerated Buddhism because it did not clash with Shinto.

The only solution to any problem is the market, competition, the profit motive, or Capitalism. This is the same as in the USSR where only Communism was the solution to any problem.

When adherence to an ideology is as rigid as it is here, it is no longer just an "official ideology." It is dogma.

Dogma killed the USSR. It is destroying the USA.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Wake-Up Call
Posted by: chlamor on May 19, 2008 9:34 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
[Before getting to the meat of this, let me pause for a moment, to offer a word in defense of righteous anger. There is a certain legitimacy to raw anger. Anger is a correct & reasonable first response to injustice. By itself, it is an inadequate response to injustice. But it is an excellent foundation on which more constructive responses can be built.

And, on the other hand, the most paralyzing & crippling response towards great injustice, is docile acceptance. THAT is what the American political system & their apologists are all about — getting you to somehow resign yourself to corporatists & warmongering imperialists, who however (like Obama) are skilled in the use of ‘uplifting’ language.]

OK, now the meat. We are at a time in our nation’s history where the political system is breaking down. It is no ordinary time. Mechanisms that have sufficed since the 1930’s are now failing.

There is zero chance that our system can be fixed through the officially-approved mechanisms. Whether overtly recognized or not, there’s a war going on — the US ruling class against all the rest of us. It’s essentially a class war. The rulers want you to remain a Democrat, because the D’s are a ruling-class institution, whose job is guiding the Dem half of the populace in paths that are safe for the rulers. To remain a Dem voter, and to swallow whatever slop the party dishes up, is to passively assent to this arrangement.

Therefore, ones primary focus should be on resisting & criticizing the system, not on adapting yourself to it. You should be talking with your friends & family about the very real things that are wrong. You should be trying to make whatever contribution you can to elevating political consciousness. Accepting the slop of the Dem Party is the opposite of all that: it deadens political consciousness, & only makes your enemies stronger.

Voting for candidates only works when there are decent candidates — but that’s not our situation. We betray ourselves if we fail to recognize that.

Well, looking at it historically, the “solution” has to be a break from the officially-approved mechanisms. It must have the form of a broad movement based on the interests of the bottom 80-90% of the population, rather than on the interests of the top 1%. It has to be what they call “radical” politics — something that big business and the media are definitely not going to like, any more than they like Kucinich or antiwar protestors.

The 2 parties are really just a mechanism of social control. They’re not a way for “the people” to express their will; they’re a way for rulers to control the people — partly by making them believe that they (the peeps) have some say (which they don’t). Building a movement to oppose this takes time. But its sine qua non is political consciousness — the type that socialists understand & try to cultivate; and that the big-business parties & media try to suppress & eradicate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A Wake-Up Call Posted by: Dboy
» RE: A Wake-Up Call Posted by: buzzsaw
» RE: A Wake-Up Call Posted by: chlamor
roncypert
Posted by: roncypert on May 19, 2008 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Of all the possible dangers that existed when President Eisenhower gave his farewell address to the nation (Cold War, Nuclear war/destruction, etc.), the danger that most concerned him and about which he chose to warn the American Public was the "Military Industrial Complex". I doubt than anyone would accuse President Eisenhower of being a radical, especially a leftist radical.

“Fascism should more appropriately be called Corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.” - Benito Mussolini

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

otto
Posted by: otto on May 19, 2008 10:30 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Why don't Democrats do more to point out how Bush and Cheney have made U.S. into a totalitarian state instead of letting Bush use Hitler as an example of "the other side" and Obama as an appeaser?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: otto Posted by: FSadley
I like my perspective better
Posted by: solrev on May 19, 2008 11:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The book seems to have a lot of catchy tunes in it but basically does not seem to explain very much. What a revelation, democracies can be controlled just as easily with bucks as bullets. Ideally, I guess democracies should be controlled by demos. We nationalists really do not care if republicans, democrats, independents, bucks, or bullets manage the democracy. If the democracy does not become a nuisance we will get along fine. Inverted totalitarianism, now I like the sound of that, but it also seems misleading to us. In the past totalitarianism was always managed by bullets. Totalitarianism on a grand scale was always doomed to fail, because no superpower could ever exist that could manage the occupation required. No one was ever smart enough to act quickly enough to pacify those damn nationalists; revolution was always on tap. The new age totalitarianism of the globalists is that they can make a totalitarian world base on management by bucks in place of bullets. They do not need the superpower for a large-scale occupation, just to buy time to insure the installation of the global economy. They believe that the market can act quickly enough to pacify those damn nationalists. They underestimate how evil we nationalists really are; we will not be slaves to men, markets, or democracies. Do not come around with any of that populace or demos garbage either, we do not have a problem with nationalists of other lands, but if someone tries to make us all demons of planet earth, we will fight. World war three the globalists against the nationalists, we one the first battle against the superpower in Nam and we are winning in Iraq. I wonder where the next battle will be fought.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rn
Posted by: mnatra on May 19, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a very astute treatise very thoughtfully reasoned through. I do believe all of it.
Seems like I have read it before.Called "1984"
So the question comes down to this one as then, the one indisputable challenge:How can 98% of the people take back their country from the 2% who control it?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: rn Posted by: Dboy
Check out -
Posted by: jzelensk on May 19, 2008 11:32 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
the book "Friendly Fascism: The New Face of Power in America" by Bertram Gross, published in 1980 (yes you read that date correctly).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'd pay attention to what the kids are saying.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on May 19, 2008 11:44 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BY7875_rv1s

I'd suggest watching the whole thing, and then I'd sit down and think very carefully about what will happen when this kid reaches, say, my age.

"Are you a friend, or are you an enemy? I may just be a kid today, but tomorrow will be different."

Based on everything I know about people, I'd say that in the interests of basic self-preservation, people take this kid's side - because if you think I'm pissed off, you haven't seen anything yet.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm tired of this. There's no need for invention.
Posted by: izzyK on May 19, 2008 12:17 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't expect much agreement here but I'll say this anyways.

This article is another example of another American liberal (although as a deference to Johnson, he wasn't always a liberal) trying to square the circle. How is it that we could be ruled in such a blatantly undemocratic way when the constitution is such a pure and wonderful declaration of all the principals we hold dear. every modern person save for a few Paleocons and Fareed Zakaria knows that as democracy withers away civil liberties and civil rights are scrapped as well. So the question that is asked now is, what made the US become so increasingly undemocratic?

Their answer, as Chalmers Johnson, Naomi Wolf, and a host of others seem to think is that our "Great Republic", handed down by demigods we call the Founders has been 'corrupted', and that if checks and balances aren't working well gosh-darn-it we better get some more checks and balances!

Johnson complains about the electoral college, and acts as though we moderns have somehow conjured it up out the constitution, rather than it being set down, like the unrepresentative senate, like the house (controlled by the petty state govt's so only 1/10 of the s