Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How Advertisers Psychologically Mug Women

By Sheila Gibbons, Women's eNews. Posted May 15, 2008.


Though women make 85 percent of all consumer purchases, marketers rarely recognize the extent of women's buying power, technical savvy or confidence.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Sheila Gibbons

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

As a journalist who writes about issues of interest to women, I receive a steady stream of pitches from public relations and marketing agencies:

Secrets of discreet feminine hygiene. Products that will eliminate pounds and years. An "age-defying lift" brassiere. Another bra that makes you look like you have cosmetic breast implants (who knew that was desirable?).

For Mother's Day, there was the Love Doctor dispensing romance advice for single moms. For Valentine's Day, there was the condom paper weight and a PR rep offering an interview with America's Love Doctor.

The problem with pitches like this, many of which trade on women's anxieties, is that they seem to assume women are mainly in the business of buying trifles. And that extends to the general marketplace.

"While marketers may be aware that women are major spenders on the so-called small stuff -- groceries, apparel, kids -- they are not fully aware that women are the majority of buyers of new cars, consumer electronics and home improvement," says Marti Barletta, CEO of the marketing consultancy TrendSight Group, who was a keynote speaker at last week's annual M2W marketing conference in Chicago, which debated how marketers could improve their appeals to women.

Women's Purchasing Power is Green, Not Pink

Marketers, Barletta says, "are worried that marketing to women means making it pink and that would horrify men. ... They don't know what marketing to women is."

While marketing campaigns often seem to assume men are more technologically oriented than women, Barletta, a veteran marketing and advertising executive, says that when Best Buy analyzed its patrons, it found the majority of those cruising the aisles were men, but at the cash register, the majority of buyers were women.

Even though women make 85 percent of all consumer purchases, Barletta says the pay gap, which leaves women earning 76 cents for every dollar earned by men, creates the impression that women don't have or control much money. In fact, "Women bring in more than half of household income," Barletta says. "In a partnered household, a woman spends not only her own paycheck but most of her spouse's or partner's as well."

Much has been said and lamented over the years -- including by me in columns in this space -- of marketing that gets women to open up their wallets through a sort of psychological mugging. Ads target us with the self-improvement message. One example that comes to mind is Nutrisystem's touting of going from an already modest dress size to an even smaller one ("I went from a size 10 to a size 4!"). The relentlessly repeated premise is that we're inadequate. Unattractive. Unworthy.

Reality Check

Then there's the reality. Barletta describes women now between 50 and 75 -- a group virtually ignored by marketers -- as "the healthiest, wealthiest, most educated, active and influential generation of women in history."

If marketing reflected this -- instead of picking away at our fears about our complexions, our weight and the elasticity of our skin -- it might go a long way toward countering ageism and boosting the confidence of young women who look to older women for role models. Who knows, it might even help close the incredible gender gap in the U.S. Congress and corporate board rooms.

But Barletta says even sophisticated marketers are half a step behind where women are right now. "They'll say, 'We're offering these tools to empower women to take control of their lives, to give them more freedom and flexibility.' That's language from the 1980s and 1990s. I keep telling them women are empowered and they need to be thinking about serving women."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: marketing to women, women consumers, women shoppers, women and shopping

Sheila Gibbons is editor of Media Report to Women, a quarterly journal of news, research and commentary about women and media.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Consumerism is killing the planet, driving worker exploitation, and fueling resource wars
Posted by: Rune on May 15, 2008 12:35 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
And in light of a claim that women are responsible for 85% of consumption in the most wildly consumerist country in the world, the point of this article is how to do a better job of motivating more consumerism by women? How deeply progressive, intelligent, and nurturing!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Good luck with that.
Posted by: kepstein7777 on May 15, 2008 2:58 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Marketing will always feed on petty insecurities, self-involvement, materialism, stereotypes, etc.

Nothing personal, ladies. Or to put it another way: It's not always about you. For example, car companies continue to market big, crappy, American-made trucks to insecure males...If the trucks were as tough as the ads say, why do they fall apart in 2 years, while the dorky little Japanese trucks run forever?

Advertising is not for women who are comfortable with who they are, or men who want an economical, practical, reliable truck that gets you from point A to point B. Advertising is for suckers, idiots, and losers who need someone else to tell them what they want. So you're really wasting your time trying to class it up and make it more realistic, because that's not what it's about.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Good luck with that. Posted by: gigantor21
So this is what feminism has become
Posted by: bornxeyed on May 15, 2008 5:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Women are now complaining they aren't subjected to brainwashing as often or as effectively as men are.

I can't wait until the start complaining they aren't getting their fair share of heart attacks, strokes and industrial accidents.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» what, men don't reproduce? Posted by: e rice
» Re: what, men don't reproduce? Posted by: bornxeyed
The only thing BEING PRETTY ever got me was F@#KED
Posted by: Angela Hayden ART GODDESS on May 15, 2008 5:18 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As a teen and young woman, I was very influenced by the women's magazine Vogue. I never felt beautiful enough, good enough, smart enough or worthy enough. The more I read Vogue, the more the advertising made me feel like I could buy something that would make me feel "enough" of something. No matter how much stuff I bought, I still felt not enough.

So, now that I'm older and have worked in the marketing and advertising industry for 10 years, I realize that buying into advertising is a scam . It is only about money.

When I feel shitty about myself I remind myself that "being pretty" really never got me anything. An education, a loving family, loyal friends and interesting hobbies are what make me happy. Sure, I still buy stuff. But now I stop and think, "can I live without this?" And, most of the time I can. And, I've taught my daughters about manipulating advertising.

http://www.angelahayden.blogspot.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Confident women make men work too hard
Posted by: scheherezade on May 15, 2008 5:42 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If marketing reflected this -- instead of picking away at our fears about our complexions, our weight and the elasticity of our skin -- it might go a long way toward countering ageism and boosting the confidence of young women who look to older women for role models. Who knows, it might even help close the incredible gender gap in the U.S. Congress and corporate board rooms.

Idealism's total disinterest in human motivation never ceases to amaze.

Confident women would benefit males (not to mention 'beauty' product advertisers) how, exactly?

Day-to-day media attention on women's disgusting bodies tends to overshadow the fact that it's male sexual ego that's most fragile and insecure. Men are far more insecure and desperate for sex, every day, all their lives, than women will ever be.

Straight men in the media (including advertising) express this by portraying women as dumb sex toys, useless past 30. Gay men in the industry express it by portraying women as disgusting, uncreative leeches, useless past 30.

Confident women do not fuck assholes, or do their work for them. Confident young women with confident mature role models do not fuck ugly, spent-out middle aged men. Confident women might attract straight men for something other than appearance, thus usurping gay men's lucrative, self-styled role as cultural arbiter.

There is no benefit, whatsoever, for any male-run (which means all of it) media to portray women in a flattering light.

And the media industry itself tends to attract the worst of the worst male specimens, compounding the problem.

It will not change until women simply refuse to buy the products whose advertising denigrates them, and refuse to watch the movies and television shows that portray them negatively.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Marketing 101, year one...
Posted by: Farasien on May 15, 2008 5:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...tells you, in a number of different ways, the following:

You want to be (good/respected/loved, etc.). Buying this POS product will make you (good/respected/loved, etc.). What you already have you don't REALLY want, and more importantly, isn't enough.

Though women in society are yelling the loudest about marketing, especialy with respect to so-called 'beauty' products, it is used on everyone. They use the insecurities in all people to push their garbage like drug dealers. The thing is, marketing is largely volentary. When you watch a commercial, you are choosing to be marketed to and emotionally blackmailed. When you click on that stupid ad in the corner of the web page or respond to the spam email, you choose to be marketed to. If you really want to stop being marketed to, all you have to do is not be. When I was in college, a friend of mine challenged me to turn off the TV for one solid week. I didn't actually do it until after I left college in the midst of a financial crunch, when I was forced to let my cable go. After a week, I felt less stressed. The week turned into a month, then into yerars. After being away from it for a few weeks, I was way more relaxed, less hassled. I slept better, I ate less and my health generally improved. My productivity and focus were both markedly heightened. In short, the TV was a leech, bleeding off my energy and drive. I liken it now to a sewer drain piped directly into your living or bedroom. It spews endless shit, it insults your intelligence (its been proven a few times over sitcoms reduce IQ over time) it degrades your self-worth and saps your strength. It reinforces the status-quo, burns off a willingness to fight for your beliefs or individuality and helps the junk-producers to empty your bank account. Ever since I left the TV cult, all I can think about is- why did I ever watch in the first place?

I would challenge anyone who feels victimized by the media to do the logical thing and TURN IT OFF for at least a week. After you do, reassess how you are feeling. I almost garantee you'll be better off.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Marketing 101, year one... Posted by: Lincoln fan
"Cup Holders"-Cars and Bras
Posted by: Purple Girl on May 15, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I do love the new Cadillac commercials about what features women are actually looking for in Cars' cup holders' LOL . Of course Cadillac shows they really have no idea since they are trying to push off another Gas Guzzler we told them to get rid of in the '70s (first Staged Oil Crisis).Frankly i could careless if I can blow the Doors of the 'Boys Club' I need to get where i need to go as safely and cost effectively as Possible. Why is it the Big 3 can add Bobbles like DVD players and heated seats but has been 'unable' to improve Fuel efficiency ( which HAS been rolled back from gains made in the late '80s when Japan kicked their ass in sales)and alternative Fuel sources (Electric car was developed in the '80's Too- Guess Who 'Killed ' it?).the big 3 whined about seatbelts, held their breath & stomped their feet about airbags- but hey now my car can talk to me- WOW what engineering marvels, what innovation, what a crock of shit!Not to mention the part they have played in the pilferation of global terrorism playing with their oppressive 'Royal' Oil Regimes ( look down Big 3 you have blood all over your hands!).
I've got a GPS system for them and it is telling THEM EXACTLY WHRERE TO GO!!!
So Boys (and girls) if you want to have a company into the next century you had better start listening -esp to US Michiganders who you have Betrayed and Danced an dSpit on our Ancestors grave who Built your Companies from NOTHING!
We do NOT need YOU - You need US!
Hugs & kisses From You lady Friends here In MI!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

So...
Posted by: Q30 on May 15, 2008 6:25 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...what kind of wierd oppression is it that affords the oppressed classes to make 85% of all consumer purchases?

Some victims.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: So... Posted by: Crazy H
» RE: So... Posted by: Q30
Most annoying commercial - Multi-Grain Cheerios?
Posted by: war_on_tara on May 15, 2008 6:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not quite sure what to make of this article, but it immediately reminded me of the current, incredibly annoying commercial for Multi-Grain Cheerios.

This one MUST be directed at women, if only because it can't possibly be directed at men!

How many stereotypes can fit in 30 seconds? Wimpy, nebbishy, henpecked husband... terrified of his tired, cranky, supposedly fat wife (who doesn't even look overweight, though hubby could stand to lose a few!)... WTF, who WOULD this appeal to?

And the most annoying thing about it is, Multi-Grain Cheerios is actually a good cereal! But I'm boycotting it until they stop running that damn commercial.

Is there a way to research how effective certain advertising has been? I'd be curious to look at a website about that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

make-up and fashion is B.S.
Posted by: ptown on May 15, 2008 6:57 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
make-up and fashion is B.S.

i just shaved my legs for the first time in 5 months (for a summer event). the last time i wore high heeled shoes was 1989 for a wedding and i wear a bit of cruelty free eye liner once or twice a year for fancy events.

other than that, au natural. we don't need anything more than toothpaste, floss, soap, shampoo, conditioner, lotion, and for some furry mammals like me, a razor and tweezers. i do the absolute minimum and yet i am always clean and presentable.

everything else is garbage and creates a multi-billion dollar drain on our oil and water resources, and contributes to choking the planet with landfill and plastic gyres. animals suffer for that hair dye,etc.

women, grow old gracefully and cosmetic free.
the beauty industry is raping and killing the planet.

if we gave away the "extra money" we spent on glamour-trash, we could feed the world.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: make-up and fashion is B.S. Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» historical fashion trivia Posted by: e rice
» Well said!!! Posted by: margwa
» RE: Well said!!! Posted by: Sunfell
"the healthiest, wealthiest, most educated, active and influential generation of women in history."
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on May 15, 2008 7:01 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If that is true then this country is in some serious trouble. Because 50-75 year olds, as a group, aint too terribly wealthy or healthy. I'm not talking about just women, it's that entire generation of disillusioned yuppies. This is dedicated to all you debt-soaked yuppies who've been around a block or two.

One in three dead, dying, or almost died of cancer.

Collectively in debt, no net worth. What little money this demographic does have is invested in companies like Walmart, which profits from the destruction of the american industrial base. Or Monsanto, who genetically modifies plants to be sterile, devoid of nutrition, and to cause increased allergies and possibly even cause cancer. Go on down the list... General Motors: killed the electric car. Exxon: Spilled millions of gallons of oil in Alaska and still hasnt paid for it. Every fortune 500 company has its own little horror story tucked under the rug.

"...active and influential generation of women in history."

Active? Active in what? Active in being a good consumer? Watching Fox News? The lot of you dont know a thing about what's going on in the world, or even how the world works. You'd think after being around for 50-75 years you would take at least a little time out of your precious consumer schedule to figure things out. But no, your own shallow selfish golf course drama is more important.

Where were you when Kennedy was shot? Where were you when the Gulf of Tonkin was staged? Where were you when the USS Liberty was sank? Where were you when the CIA was caught shipping the cocaine into this country and selling arms to Iran?

All these false flag events, you just pretend they dont exist. And all the debt directly caused by these false flag events, you just pretend that doesnt exist too, dont you? Have you noticed the pattern yet?

1. False flag event.
2. Massive deficit spending.
3. Inflation and currency devaluation.
1. False flag event.
2. Massive deficit spending.
3. Inflation and currency devaluation.
1. False flag event.
2. Massive deficit spending.
3. Inflation and currency devaluation.

That is basically the last 40+ years of american history. YOUR entire lifetime this has been going on. And you did nothing. NOTHING.

'They' got away with it for so long... and it's been so profitable... 9/11 was simply inevitable. But of course you dont believe in any of that thar conspiracy stuff do you? Why would you. You think it's perfectly ok to leave this country in trillions and trillions of dollars in debt... basically insolvent. You dont care that you're screwing over your own children. You dont care about fluoride in your water. You dont care about mercury in your flu shots. So why would you even care about 9/11 being an inside job.

Try studying the last 20 years of Russian history. And know that it is possible for both sides to lose a war, even a cold war.

Let me tell you one more thing. If you do study Russian history, one of the key things you'll notice is that in Russia, there were plenty of people who saw what was coming for them. And many of them were what you'd probably call "cheauvanistic male pigs."

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» sadly somewhat true... Posted by: ptown
» You forgot... Posted by: tulugaq
» RE: You forgot... Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Synchronized ranting Posted by: westomoon
» RE: Synchronized ranting Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: You forgot... but you missed the point Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
» RE: You forgot... but you missed the point Posted by: Jefferson's Guardian
I USE DOVE SOAP
Posted by: VZEQICVA on May 15, 2008 7:09 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Because IT IS BETTER than the others. I haven't been tricked or made to feel inferior. While women tend to be conscious of appearance, men are equally infulenced by countless sports personalities and what they eat and wear. It's true that advertising is overdone and there's too much of it. But it is forced on everyone. Men, women and children from day one. We should all tune out most of it. Thanks, ANNA

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: I USE DOVE SOAP Posted by: goatini
Only women are stupid and vain enough
Posted by: arclight7 on May 15, 2008 8:56 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
to fall for these sales pitches.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Come back with your husband!
Posted by: Pale_Green_Pants on May 15, 2008 9:37 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
A few months ago my mom walked into a Circuit City store with $1500 in cash in her pocket (literally) and announced that she wanted a new computer, preferably a laptop. She isn't extremely tech-savvy, but surely the salesperson could help her choose the right computer for her needs? After all, the ONLY advantage to buying a computer from a store(rather than online) is that you can discuss your options with a human being. Instead, the guy told her she "can't get anything good at that price" and basically refused to help her.

I'm guessing this salesperson looked at her (early 50s, in thrift store jeans) and decided she wasn't worth his time--though somehow I suspect if she had walked in with her teenaged son in tow, it would have been a different story. The 21st century eqivalent of the car salesman telling the little woman to "come back with your husband."

I'm glad I do most of my shopping online.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Come back with your husband! Posted by: Pale_Green_Pants
Psychologically mugged??!? How about rape!!
Posted by: jeffrey7 on May 15, 2008 10:03 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Anyone who spends the usual six hours in front of the boob-tube will tell you women get a raw deal in commericals. They have a pad with wings,pills for the yeast,creams for infections,birth control,douches and odoreaters.What do they sell to men? Raging hard-ons and athletes foot goodies.
We have slank back into the models of the fifties and sixties. Women are either glamour godesses,whores or bitchy crime fighters. We've come nowhere. We put up images that no one can live up to male or female, families that few could actually achieve either the income of harmony status and then you get a herpies commerical. Maybe instead of dumping broadcast television for cable or dish TV,we should just dump TV.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not buying it
Posted by: Crazy H on May 15, 2008 11:53 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm not buying it for one minute.*

The author is saying that American Marketing Slimeballs - the most highly evolved predators on the planet - don't know how to catch their prey??!!

These people spend BILLIONS OF DOLLARS researching exactly how to market what to who. They know who buys it, when they buy it, why they buy it, where the buy it and how to get them to buy more of it.

Believe me, if more women would buy more products to make them fatter if they were only hawked by old, fat, ugly women with bad hair - the airwaves would be filled with old, fat, ugly women with bad hair.

Reality check: if they're so ineffective, how is it that women - making only 43% of the money - are spending 85% of the money?

*(tee hee "buying it" - I just crack me up)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do NOT hold up Dove as a shining corporate example!!!
Posted by: stellabloo on May 15, 2008 1:01 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
.... because I AM a savvy "consumer" ... The only thing good thing that Unilever has ever done is: .... (still thinking) ..... (suggestions welcome)....
... the Real Beauty campaign is just the latest industry success story on how to make women feel "empowered" as they buy another round of carcinogenic skin crap. One honest lad in the marketing department agreed with me that frankly, 99.9% of beauty products are TOXIC CRAP, Unilever being no exception.

Now, not only am I not driven to buy Dove simply because the models are flabby (Listen up PEOPLE! "natural" beauty is a product of HEALTH and FITNESS, not soap ... flabby may be "in" in under the burkha but you will never convince me that a sedentary body is beautiful, no matter how much soap you throw at it?) but Unilever also puts out the incredibly misogynist Axe ads ...
... and most offensive of all - Unilever has a thriving third world business in Fair n Lovely skin lighteners which, if you view these ads on youtube, show some of the rudest sexist and outright rascist crap you have ever seen for one of the most toxic products you could think of. This is the same company!

BTW I suggest products such as simple glycerin soap or good organic shampoo, in order to minimize exposure to toxins like parabens, lauryl sulfates, etc . Reading the label is your #1 most empowering action!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Mute button?
Posted by: Logic's Edge on May 15, 2008 1:05 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I hate most advertising on television for many reasons. But I don't feel myself to be mugged by the television or a magazine article, because I can just mute it, channel surf, turn the page, shut it off or just toss the whole thing out.

That's all you have to do.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's an interesting and amusing article
Posted by: westomoon on May 15, 2008 2:07 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Geeze, and they say feminists have no sense of humor!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

fRates
Posted by: frates101 on May 15, 2008 3:31 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Well, this is capitalism at it's best (worst)! And more fools we for swallowing the fantasy. Wake up, people...it's time to leave the credit cards at home, avoid the mall and go for a long walk with your kids (and pack a healthy sandwich for lunch).

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

if americans really wanted to be free of manipulation
Posted by: e rice on May 15, 2008 4:37 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
ads and commercials would be legally limited to a picture of the product and a short statement, with no adjecties or adverbs, of what it does.

what, exactly, is the point of demanding less sexist, ageist, bigoted, unrealistic advertising when the result would just be more psychologically effective BRAINWASHING?

the english majors put out of work could, just a thought, TEACH children how to properly use the language. or work in publishing and stop the degradation of the language by editors who plainly can't spell or use tenses properly.

the mental health experts using their skills to manipulate could be put to work HELPING people rather than exploiting them.

the money saved on all the aspects of advertising could be used to lower prices--but would problably find its way into the pockets of the executives.

for decades, i have based my buying on how much air time and magazine/newspaper space a product on the shelf receives--if a product is still offered without advertising because word of mouth keeps it available, that's what i buy.

if a product i buy is advertised as new and improved, i know it will actually work less well than the old form, and i start buying something else.

i am obviously in the minority.

because advertising is doing a dandy job of selling garbage to americans.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» you're right Posted by: e rice
About women
Posted by: maxfactor on May 16, 2008 7:18 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
95% (5%error of margin) are self indulgent, insecure, overweight dumbos leeching all day on artifical emotion provided by the media. In their spare time they are womens worst enemy. Why would a marketeer want to advertise to a group of people that has not much buying power except for everyday survival and some nippes at the shoppee. This ladies is the reality and its backed by a wealth of expensive studies. The dynamic powerwomen simply does not exist - a little bit of extra purchasing power, during a brief timewindow in her life, is not enough to offset what I have stated in the first paragraph, because this bit of extraincome goes straight into more shiny nippes 10x the price of cheap nippes. Or have you ever wondered why and who the pricing of shoes and bags comes to happen?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]