Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Pretrial Lock Up

By Earl Ofari Hutchinson, AlterNet. Posted May 2, 2008.


Thousands of prisoners languish in jail for months, even years, before they are tried.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Are the "New Atheists" As Bad as Christian Fundamentalists?
Frank Schaeffer

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
How a Public Jobs Program Could Put America Back on Track
Julianne Malveaux

DrugReporter:
Pot Is More Mainstream Than Ever, So Why Is Legalization Still Taboo?
Steven Wishnia

Environment:
Why We Need Bees and More People Becoming Organic Beekeepers
Makenna Goodman

Food:
The Raw Milk Revolution: Behind America's Emerging Battle Over Food Rights
Makenna Goodman

Health and Wellness:
New York May Stop Heartless Health Insurers from Dropping Coverage When It Stops Being Profitable
William Ehart

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
Focusing on Fort Hood Killer's Beliefs Is an Easy Out to Avoid the Deeper Reasons for the Massacre
Mark Ames

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
What Michelle and Barack's Marriage Has in Common with 56 Million Other Ones
Annabelle Gurwitch

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
Fetus-Shaped Potatoes? Going Undercover Inside the Weird World of Right-Wing Abortion Foes
Ann Neumann

Rights and Liberties:
"My Kids Want to Hide Their Identity; They're Scared Someone Will Attack Us": U.S. Muslims Being Targeted
Jaisal Noor

Sex and Relationships:
Instant Sex: Has the Digital Age Destroyed Relationships or Made Them Better?
Vanessa Richmond

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
With Unemployment at 40 Percent, Afghan Teens Enlist in Army, Police
Lal Aqa Sherin

More stories by Earl Ofari Hutchinson

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

On Sept. 4, 21-year-old Joshua Pomier will have served nearly four years in a detention center near San Bernardino, Calif. Pomier is charged with multiple counts of car theft and robbery. There are two deeply troubling problems with the amount of time he has spent behind bars. One, he has not been convicted of any of the crimes he's charged with. He had barely turned 18 years old when he and another juvenile were arrested for the crimes in September 2004. Pomier and family members vehemently protest his innocence. The even more tormenting problem is not Pomier's guilt or innocence, but the absurdly long length of time that he has been jailed awaiting disposition, any disposition, of the charges leveled against him.

His bail was set at nearly a half million dollars, and there have been several delayed court dates. During that time, he has been relentlessly pressured to accept a plea bargain that will require him to serve a lengthy prison sentence. Pomier has refused, and continues to protest his innocence.

Pomier is African American, and his dragged out incarceration without being convicted of anything is not unusual. In fact, he's a near textbook example of how thousands of mostly black and Latino young adults and juveniles languish for months, even years, in America's jails with high or no bail, receive shoddy or non-existent legal counsel, and are browbeaten and even threatened by harried, overworked, and often indifferent public defenders and prosecutors to accept deals.

The Coalition for Juvenile Justice estimates that on any given day, nearly 30,000 youth between the ages of 14 and 18 years old are locked down in juvenile detention centers nationally for interminably long periods awaiting disposition of their cases. Even with the plunge in juvenile and adult crime, the numbers of youth and young adults incarcerated for lengthy pre-detention jail time nearly doubled in the 1990s. During the same time, the rates of excessive pre-trial detention time dropped for white youth.

The young adult defendants are nearly always faced with excessively high bail, and for juveniles, no bail. In the juvenile system, most states do not permit bail. Juveniles are considered wards of the court, and pretrial release is solely at the discretion of the judge. High bail, or lack of bail, clog court calendars, and overcrowded jails virtually ensure that defendants such as Pomier get lost in the system without any disposition of their case. In one study, the Sentencing Project found that blacks on average were held for a year or more without any action on their case.

The effect of outrageously long pretrial imprisonment has been catastrophic. It has severely strained jail and detention center inmate capacity, overtaxed city and county budgets, and strapped public defenders to keep up with the backlog of cases that have not had any legal resolution. The Juvenile Justice group's study pegged the cost of one detention bed at more than $1 million over 20 years, and that's a juvenile detention bed. The jail costs for lengthy adult pretrial imprisonment is higher.

Then there's the human cost. Excessive pretrial detention has resulted in a rise in inmate violence in overcrowded, poorly served jails, increased suicides, stress-related illnesses, and psychiatric ailments, as well as the personal anguish of the family members of the defendant awaiting trial or sentencing not knowing how, or especially when, their fate will be decided. The outrage of men and women languishing indefinitely behind bars costs society in still other ways. A San Francisco study of 1,500 high risk youth found that the youths that were placed in alternative to detention programs had a far lower recidivism rate than youth who remained incarcerated while awaiting sentencing.

An international criminal justice reform group, Justice Initiative, has established pretrial detention reform study projects in 10 countries. In Mexico, the project has worked with prosecutors in several areas to provide a more efficient and effective bail supervision program, bail assistance and counseling programs to ensure that defendants have access to fair and reasonable bail. This has reduced the number of defendants who skip bail, and has lowered recidivism rates.

The United Nations Human Rights Committee, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and other international legal and human rights groups have fiercely condemned excessive pretrial imprisonment in the United States and other countries. They have labeled it a gross violation of civil liberties. It also mocks the U.S. Constitution's precept of a defendant's right to a speedy trial.

The outrage and condemnation of international legal and human rights bodies and the efforts by some states at reforms in the way defendants awaiting disposition of their cases are handled is welcome. However, it won't do much to ease the anxiety of Pomier's family. They have waited for nearly four years to find out the ultimate legal fate of Pomier. Unfortunately, there's no sign that their wait will end any time soon.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: prison, minorities, pretrial, bail

Earl Ofari Hutchinson is an author and political analyst. His forthcoming book is The Ethnic Presidency: How Race Decides the Race to the White House (Middle Passage Press, February 2008).

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
An instance of this grabbed my attention a couple days ago
Posted by: just john on May 3, 2008 7:46 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
You'll recall the story that was making the rounds, about a guy suing a jail for his 100 pound weight loss (400 lbs to 300 lbs.)

Lots of people chuckled, but I marvelled at the circumstances. He was in jail for eight months awaiting trial on murder charges. I thought eight month wait on a murder charge? Who's ahead of him and what did they do?

So your story was timely in explaining this whole thing.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Demand A Speedy Trial
Posted by: hole11 on May 4, 2008 4:39 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Solves that problem.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stay away from electoral politics
Posted by: progdem on May 4, 2008 9:17 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This article was informative and about an important issue. Contrast that with the pathetic posts by this writer on campaign politics and you see how the election we are in perverts and distracts the left.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Revolving Bail Funds
Posted by: squinty on May 5, 2008 11:50 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
thanks for the story!

A few organizations here and there have created Revolving Bail Funds (RBF). I've been speaking to a few recently because we're trying to start one, beginning with Nesto Monell:

freenesto.org

in our research we've found this one -
Center for Community Justice

sadly the RBF which was started at the Benedict Center,
Benedict Center

and ran for a few years, was undone by a fraudulent story run in the newspaper, about some suspect who then committed a(nother) crime while out on bail.

wikipedia links to this NY Times story - US and Philipines only countries in the world to have for-profit bail. Bail bondsmen

if you have experience with RBFs or want to help Nesto - send me an email. aboutnesto AT yahoo.com

peace, ken

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

David T Omaha
Posted by: nelawyer on May 8, 2008 6:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Thank you for this story. I requested a bond review last week and laid out the reasons my client should be out, including the fact that the felony the prosecution had previously told the judge about (before I was on the case) resulted in an acquital not a conviction and that a previous prosecutor had recommended the same bond I was requesting.

The judge interrupted me, telling me to "cut to the chase" and then said "In my experience, when it's a weak case the defendant is more likely to run." Of course, he left the bond the same, meaning a long wait before trial.

Demanding a speedy trial doesn't work as a cure all either as the time is tolled for all defense pretrial motions and courts can use this to their advantage by withholding either hearing the motions or ruling on them. Thus, I had a client last week threatening to complain to the bar that I'd filed too many motions. He'd gotten jailhouse advice that his case was winnable on speedy trial grounds when speedy trial law is actually complex.

The founders, at least those who demanded clear prohibitions against governmental overreaching in the Bill of Rights, knew that excessive bail needed to be prohibited lest the government use it to undermine the presumption of innocence or, worse, to push politically motivated prosecutions.

This is an important issue that's seldom discussed outside crim defense circles. However, people need to be reminded that the rights of the poor are also your rights and that the rights of the best of us are only secure to the extent the rights of the worst among us are enforced.

Thanks for bringing this up.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement