Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

We Must Imagine a Life Without Oil

By Mark Hertsgaard, The Nation. Posted April 29, 2008.


The era of cheap, abundant petroleum is just about over. How ready are we to change our habits?

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Mark Hertsgaard

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

It used to be that only environmentalists and paranoids warned about running out of oil. Not anymore. As climate change did over the past few years, peak oil seems poised to become the next big idea commanding the attention of governments, businesses and citizens the world over. The arrival of $119-a-barrel crude and $4-a-gallon gasoline this spring are but the most obvious signs that global oil production has or soon will peak. With global demand inexorably rising, a limited supply will bring higher, more volatile prices and eventually shortages that could provoke -- to quote the title of the must-see peak oil documentary -- the end of suburbia. If the era of cheap, abundant oil is indeed coming to a close, the world's economy and, paradoxically, the fight against climate change could be in deep trouble.

Though largely unnoticed by the world media, a decisive moment in the peak oil debate came last September, when James Schlesinger declared that the "peakists" were right. You don't get closer to the American establishment and energy business than Schlesinger, who has served as chair of the Atomic Energy Commission, head of the CIA, Defense Secretary, Energy Secretary and adviser to countless oil companies. In a speech to a conference sponsored by the Association for the Study of Peak Oil, Schlesinger said, "It's no longer the case that we have a few voices crying in the wilderness. The battle is over. The peakists have won." Schlesinger added that many oil company CEOs privately agree that peak oil is imminent but don't say so publicly.

One who does is Jeroen van der Veer, CEO of Royal Dutch Shell. Without using the term "peak oil," van der Veer warned in January, "After 2015, easily accessible supplies of oil and gas probably will no longer keep up with demand."

Of course, peak oil could arrive sooner than 2015; columnist George Monbiot has claimed in the Guardian that a Citibank report calculates the date at 2012. But even 2015 leaves a very short time in which to prepare, because modern societies were built on cheap, abundant oil.

"The world has never faced a problem like this," warned a 2005 study funded by George W. Bush's Energy Department. "Previous energy transitions (wood to coal and coal to oil) were gradual and evolutionary; oil peaking will be abrupt and revolutionary."

The United States, with its two-hour commutes, three-car families, atrophied mass transit and petroleum-based food system, is most vulnerable to an oil shock. But similar vulnerabilities exist in most industrial societies, not to mention the roaring economies of China and India, where oil consumption is rising faster even than GDP as newly middle-class consumers buy the cars they have long dreamed of.

At first glance, one might think that peak oil would help the fight against climate change. After all, less available oil should translate into less oil consumption and lower greenhouse gas emissions. But modern civilization, to borrow George W. Bush's term, is addicted to oil. If peak oil arrives before the addiction is treated, the junkie will seek even more dangerous ways to get his fix.


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: peak oil, climate change, economy, oil dependence

Mark Hertsgaard, the environment correspondent for The Nation, is the author of six books, including "Earth Odyssey: Around the World In Search of Our Environmental Future." His next book is called, "Living Through the Storm: How We Survive the Next 50 Years of Climate Change."

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Too late. Yesterday, the The New York Times announced that peak oil is here. NOW.
Posted by: Rune on Apr 29, 2008 12:27 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
NYT may not have used the term "peak oil," but they certainly described the condition and went down the list of countries and regions experiencing peaked or declining oil production. Here, see for yourself.

So, this is not a drill. This is not another short term oil crisis that will give way to long term lower prices and plentiful supply. This is not a problem you can blame on some bad guy in some place most Americans never visit and threaten and bomb him until everyone forgets what the true source of trouble is. Sorry, this is the real deal. Whatcha gonna do, America?

You can keep on forking out the last of your credit backed cash to play dumb while you destroy your economy and environment, which doesn't hold a lot of promise for your future (or that of your grandchildren and their grandchildren). Or, you can get smart, learn to conserve and prosper, and take a load off your debt service, your trade deficit, your environmental crises, your foreign policy disasters, and, yeah, your overbooked days and nights and overfull garbage cans (to say nothing of overfull pants and dresses).

Time's up. What's it gonna be?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Thanks so much! Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Thanks so much! Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: Issues? Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Issues? [IS a problem for me. Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: If it helps you Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: If it helps you Posted by: Squarehead
» Freddy Mercury said it all! Posted by: Artkansas
» Ignoring Cuba? Posted by: Rune
That's not so hard to do. Stupid Author !
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 29, 2008 1:05 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Look, we're all gonna learn to be frugal. We're all gonna get our shit together and promote alternative renewables. We're all gonna force Congress to repeal those gas guzzler tax breaks which should never have made it in the first place. We're all gonna start finding out the 26000 industrial uses of hemp and realize why we refused to keep it legal all in the name of protecting Big Oil. We're not gonna allow our public transportation infrastructure to stay in ruins after 3 decades. Instead, we're gonna make sure we're fighting for affordable and decent quality transportation.

If you wanna be a LOSER like the author, be my guest. Otherwise, who's ready to join me and be a WINNER?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Not in this article. Posted by: maxpayne
» RE: What we need is .... Posted by: boydranchitos
Peak Oil has Three Corollaries : Peak Credit , Peak Food, Peak BS ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 29, 2008 1:07 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
We are already seeing the effects of peak food. Export quotas, export bans, rationing and skyrocketing prices. Food is all about oil. Rowing, planting, spraying, fertilizing, harvesting, processing, shipping, and distribution all use vast amounts of oil. Oil will have to be targeted at food production, lest we starve.

Peak credit, AKA peak money is not far away. Our money is created by loans monetized by checking accounts. As the economy falters new loans will shrink and shrink and as old loans are either paid off or go bad the money in our economy will shrink and shrink. Less money in the system means repeat the steps in the previous sentence only harder and faster and so on and so on until the economy is in shambles. Our financial system will have to be reengineered or there will be an economic meltdown that makes the Great Depression look swell. We need to get rid of fractional reserve banking and install a public central bank that doesn't have to borrow money to get it into the economy.

Peak oil is here. They no longer give the actual barrels of oil produced anymore. Oil production is mixed with something they call liquids. Liquids are by-products of natural gas drilling and other petro mining processes. Liquids are no where close to oil in energy efficiency or distillate production, yet they count them with crude oil production. "Liquids" by some estimates make up 10% of all barrel production figures, up from 2% a few short years ago.

Those new oil finds ? Hogwash. All the major finds announced recently have either major production obstacles or are obscenely overstated.

Brazil:Brazil's plan to become one of the world's biggest oil exporters hinges on exploiting crude six miles below the ocean surface in deposits so hot they can melt the metal used to carry uranium to nuclear plants.

Tapping what may be the biggest oil finds in the Western Hemisphere in three decades will require equipment that can withstand 18,000 pounds per square inch of pressure, enough to crush a pickup truck, pipes that can carry oil at temperatures above 500 degrees Fahrenheit (260 Celsius) and drill bits that can penetrate layers of salt more than one mile thick.

The Bakken Formation in the Dakotas and Canada; They announced over 400 billion barrels of discovered oil. The fine print says that only about 1% of this oil will ever be produced because it is not found in big pools of oil but locked in shale rock.

Mark Hertsgaard has written a fine article. I'd pay attention to what he wrote ... for your own good.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peak Oil Happened Already in May 2005
Posted by: bcgirl125 on Apr 29, 2008 2:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
According to this website:
http://www.theoildrum.com/tag/update

And this article in the Christian Science Monitor:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0806/p15s01-wmgn.html

Where does the 2012/2015 prediction come from?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Peak Oil Is A Scam To Promote World Depopulation
Posted by: opmoc on Apr 29, 2008 2:24 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The following was written in 2004 and I believe it is very close to the truth

linked text

I am totally convinced that there is no real shortage of energy - but I am also totally convinced that the World is seriously overpopulated.

Now if you find yourself in a position of actually being able to influence the course of World events - ie you are incredibly rich and powerful - then what action should be taken that would be of the greatest benefit to both future human life - and all other forms of life on the planet?

There are in fact several potential options but it appears that the one most favoured by the ruling elites - is a very rapid cull of Billions.

This will be achieved by provoking simultaneous concurrent artificial mass crises and shortages in energy and food whilst also crashing the entire world financial system.

Its a planned Armageddon designed to reduce the World population by over 90%.

The poorest in the world will go first. Whilst millions will simply starve to death, their will also be mass war over resources that will probably go nuclear and help in the process of mass destruction.

The plan seems highly likely to go wrong - and instead of ending up with 500 Million humans - we will probably end up with none - and the cockroaches will inherit the planet.

This my dear environmentalists is what we have in store if we adopt your fascist friend's policies.

There are of course far more graceful solutions to achieve population reduction - but they won't work so quickly.

Meanwhile those in control of religions continue their policies of encouraging their flocks to have as many kids as possible.

We really are in serious shit - but all our problems are resolvable without mass genocide if we adopt sensible policies.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

This is why they invaded Iraq - HELLO???
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 29, 2008 2:32 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm sure that the fact of oil's eventual peak is not a recent discovery. They've known about it for years. This explains the unexplainable. The 2002 invasion of Iraq didn't make any sense to me at the time: Saddam Hussein had no ties to Al Quida, they were not in any way involved with the hideous attacks of September 11, 2001, they obviously had no weapons of mass destruction program _ but they had a whole shotload of oil - lots and lots and lots and lots of oil; the second or third largest oil reserves on the Planet Earth.

That is why over one million Iraqi men, women and little children have been killed. That is why over four-thousand American sevicemen and women have laid down their lives. America ignored the coming crisis for decades. Once it was on the horizen, they got lazy and desperate. Instead of turning to science to solve the problem, they turned, instead to the Military Industrial Complex.

My, goodness, that explains volumes, doesn't it?

Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
Post #151: Random Thoughts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Even in the '60s Posted by: Artkansas
» Follow the money. Posted by: Artkansas
Proper Link:
Posted by: Tom Degan on Apr 29, 2008 2:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Post #151: Random Thoughts

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

One word for you...
Posted by: owlbear1 on Apr 29, 2008 3:36 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Plastic.

Most of it petroleum based.

A world without oil is a world without cheap plastic.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: There is also soy-based plastics Posted by: rfrancis@godisdead.com
» We don't need no .... Posted by: ptown
» RE: We don't need no .... Posted by: channing
» RE: We don't need no .... Posted by: sasquuatch55
Reality Check
Posted by: Middle Aged Heathen on Apr 29, 2008 3:44 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I don't deny for a moment that we're somewhere near Peak Oil. I don't deny for a moment that our reliance upon internal combustion engines is killing our planet. I believe that the illegal and immoral invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq are unconscionable resource wars, and I gave up my motor vehicle when the US invaded Iraq. Those wars are not MY wars.

All that said, the math doesn't yield the result that our current energy price woes are due to Peak Oil. Since the Idiot Son of An Asshole first stole the presidency, the price of crude oil has increased 500%, while the pump price of gasoline has increased less than 100% and consumption has fallen only 20%. Correlation? Nope.

I remember the Arab Oil Embargo of 1973 and the fabricated shortage of 1979, events of an insignificant magnitude compared to Peak Oil. During both of those previous events, gas stations around the nation had "No Gas" signs up more often than not, there were long lines at the pumps, and there was rationing in place in most metropolitan areas. Aside from the prices, there's no sign of shortage now.

As much as I champion the cause of alternative, non-combustive energy sources, the only conclusion I can draw given the above is that the oil companies are bending us over the table just because they can. If anyone has logically sound evidence to the contrary, I'd dearly love to hear it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Reality Check Posted by: boydranchitos
Time To Stop Arguing About It
Posted by: jackburns on Apr 29, 2008 4:46 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Arguing about whether it's here or not here is pointless. Arguing about alternative energy is probably pointless.
Direct action is all that matters. Focusing on things you can control, namely your own life and daily practices.
We need more cyclists, home veggie gardens, work from home schedules, etc. I bike to work two days, work from home one day and drive two. Hopefully, that will be change where I can only drive one day. Perhaps none.
Look at the example of Willits, CA. They've been working on building a post Peak Oil community for some time.
It's just time to get busy.
And we're not going to run out of oil any time soon. That's not what Peak Oil means. However, if we conserve this resource and use it wisely, we shouldn't have any trouble producing drugs or other needed things for quiet some time. We sure don't need NASCAR, but try to tell 10 million bubba's the most important thing in their life is going away.
Peak Oil is the best thing that could possibly happen for the environment, and because of it, humans will either relearn how to live sustainably and bioregionally or cease to live.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Attitude is everything
Posted by: zeofredo on Apr 29, 2008 4:58 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I got in trouble and have basically been blacklisted (ie. forced to go incommunicado) by certain friends of mine for merely wanting to discuss such situations as peak oil. I take no credit personally for being in the information vanguard, but am careful to find it among creditable sources who know what they're talking about. I am partly thrilled AND partly horrified to find that their predictions about the contemporary situation were/are on target. This isn't Nostradamus stuff we're talking... it's simply observational and analytical.

But this is all of no account. Many regular folks... be they working, shopping, self-involved in numerous diversions... are just not allowing themselves to accept it. We can preach all we want about changing our habits and living on less in the future, but the biggest challenge will be to accommodate the naysayers who, once they realize this has come to pass, will be a huge strain on nerves and progressive measures.

The best thing I can suggest is to have a coherent narrative ready for such skeptics which will help focus our energies on creative/productive recourse rather than continue the petty squabbling over idealogical bias that has been the norm until now.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Coherent narratives Posted by: Sojourner
» RE: Attitude is everything Posted by: K.P.o.t.R.
Nawww
Posted by: talkville on Apr 29, 2008 5:08 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Not 'imagine' a living without oil; confronting, adapting and changing our living without it as well as planning for it. The Imagination is ALREADY waaay over-taxed with this and myriad other contradictions of the capitalist way of living. The high-part of the hog is pretty well chewed up and thread-bare. Even those who still like to live 'high on the hog' are having to discreetly substitute other kinds of food stuffs and making that saying pure non-sense.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE:Way to Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: Way to Posted by: Squarehead
» RE: Way to Posted by: talkville
The problem is it's not happening as the peakists said.
Posted by: Livemike on Apr 29, 2008 5:48 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The reason production is going down isn't that fields are running out it's that governments in critical areas are shooting themselves in the foot. Get rid of the 80% tax on oil prices of $28 in Russia and that's half the problem gone. Allow the mexican state oil company to run itself like a business and that's half the rest. We don't have peak oil, we have peak government stupidity.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Lemme guess.... Posted by: Jasonix
oil depletion allowance
Posted by: e rice on Apr 29, 2008 5:55 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
this was the term used in the 50s for the tax credits given to american oil companies to encourage them to develope alternatives to oil.

you see, even in the 1950s, EVERYONE KNEW oil was a finite, unrenewable commodity.

there was quite a lot of public demand for energy alternatives at the time of the oil embargo. there was an equal amount of ridicule for energy alternatives.

so here we are, thanks to more than 50 years of the american public's refusing to face facts and hold politicians and corporations accountable.

here we are, asked to 'imagine' an oil-free existence, just as the number of commericals and advertisements that are pushing 'green' products seems to be increasing geometrically. how coincidental.

cui bono? (hint--it ain't us.)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It Ain't About Oil
Posted by: Elmo409 on Apr 29, 2008 5:56 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everyone is up in arms because the price of oil (and everything made from it) is soaring. "Let's use ethanol instead!" say the farmers. "Let's use more coal!" say the miners. "Let's use more nuclear power!" say the electrical companies.

How about:
Let's use less energy! Let's not drag food in from other places. Let's not ship cheap clothes and shoes from other places. Let's grow vegetables instead of grass that sucks water and the HOA says it has to be cut and no dandelions allowed.

Oh, wait. That would mean we'd have to stop being stupid. Never mind.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What might PostOil resemble?: "A World Made By Hand"
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Apr 29, 2008 6:06 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
well... gee, lemme GUESS what Post Oil international relations may resemble...

...can we expect that the US corporate or (those to whom the US owes money & collateral) will use the pillaged oil to *militarily strong-arm* & extort resource trade compliance from other nations..
...just as the US did with The BOMB...

In his first book since "The Long Emergency," James Howard Kunstler has speculated on a post-oil civilization in A World Made By Hand:
In his novelized description, the post-oil narrative, follows the people of a small New York town through an eventful summer, as they struggle with life... after a series of global catastrophes.

(promoted by this trailer video & site)


~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"do no harm"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» doh. more sloppy copy/pastes... Posted by: BlueBerry PickN
Clifford J. Wirth
Posted by: cjwirth on Apr 29, 2008 6:08 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peak Oil is a catastrophe that will change the world, according to scientific reports analyzed here: http://www.peakoilassociates.com/POAnalysis.html

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Clifford J. Wirth Posted by: Falang
seazephyr
Posted by: seazephyr on Apr 29, 2008 6:24 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Peak oil visionary Michael Rupert gave us fair and dire warning in his book Crossing the Rubicon. His office was trashed and he was run out of town for his patriotic service. Go figure.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

pjjones
Posted by: pjjones on Apr 29, 2008 6:36 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Robert Kennedy, Jr., writes in Vanity Fair May 2008 The Next President's First Task
We know that nations that “decarbonize” their economies reap immediate rewards. Sweden announced in 2006 the phaseout of all fossil fuels (and nuclear energy) by 2020. In 1991 the Swedes enacted a carbon tax . . . and as a result thousands of entrepreneurs rushed to develop new ways of generating energy from wind, the sun, and the tides, and from woodchips, agricultural waste, and garbage. Growth rates climbed to upwards of three times those of the U.S.

Iceland was 80 percent dependent on imported coal and oil in the 1970s and was among the poorest economies in Europe. Today, Iceland is 100 percent energy-independent, with 90 percent of the nation’s homes heated by geothermal and its remaining electrical needs met by hydro. The International Monetary Fund now ranks Iceland the fourth most affluent nation on earth. The country, which previously had to beg for corporate investment, now has companies lined up to relocate there to take advantage of its low-cost clean energy.

It should come as no surprise that California, America’s most energy-efficient state, also possesses its strongest economy.

The United States has far greater domestic energy resources than Iceland or Sweden does. We sit atop the second-largest geothermal resources in the world. The American Midwest is the Saudi Arabia of wind; indeed, North Dakota, Kansas, and Texas alone produce enough harnessable wind to meet all of the nation’s electricity demand. As for solar, according to a study in Scientific American, photovoltaic and solar-thermal installations across just 19 percent of the most barren desert land in the Southwest could supply nearly all of our nation’s electricity needs without any rooftop installation, even assuming every American owned a plug-in hybrid.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Wonderful and informative post Posted by: boydranchitos
» RE: pjjones cajones Posted by: HoboHomo
bozhidar bob balkas
Posted by: bozhidar on Apr 29, 2008 6:40 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
we've had four 'gods'. three of them are still going strong. all were semitic; with dark skin.
but, dear folk, none of them had up to date a wife.
no wonder they are frustated, angry, etc. so, they made us stupid, violent, greedy to assuage their own miseries. and miseries, someone said, love company.
'gods' have imposed on us the greatest scoundrels (tho not all of them are) 'god' could make.
(but, goddamn it, says i, aren't they good actors!)
and the speeches! that only 'gods' could understand. and one is ooh soo handsome!
it's awesome! 'promises', just fabulous! and the glittering generalities! to understand them, a housewife must run to a dictionary to find what the lofty words mean.
caveat, please; when i say "a housewife", i mean to say that a housewife is not stupid; she is trained by education to think of self as stupid. and most men rub it in.
me too. i have been trained also to think, Who, me? i know nothin abt nothin! anyway, who cares!
but they have been doing this to us for scant 15,000 yrs. so, what's another thousand or two for us very patient people?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Carl F
Posted by: luckycef on Apr 29, 2008 6:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
As we keep seeing the energy mess and peak oil and Green energy and bio fuels. Why is the most abundant and friendly source of energy being left out. the power of HYDROGEN!!!!!!! It is clean and the byproduct is water and water is another resource that is threatened.
We have a 2 fold winner here. Clean source of an abundant resource with the byproduct WATER another resource in danger. It is time we talk and make this happen. hydrogen has been around a long time and it is time to build the infrastructure and the auto's and sytems needed to use this abundant source of power.
Lets move on to the Hydrogen revolution!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Carl F Posted by: bornxeyed
» RE: Carl F Posted by: sunlakedude
» RE: Carl F Posted by: bornxeyed
"Visualize World Peace. . ."
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 29, 2008 7:16 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I bet that this will work just as well.

How about getting your hands dirty and changing your lifestyle, moving your retirement funds out of your lame corporate pension scheme and into renewable energy investments, and not fattening the wallets of Texas oil billionaires, Saudi oil sheiks, Iraqi puppet dictators, Nigerian puppet dictators, Chadian puppet dictators, and South American bosses like Uribe and Chavez?

How about taking on your local corporate utility and getting it replaced with a local public power utility that won't screw you over on a daily basis (like Sacramento has?). How about not buying any more gasoline at all, but going with locally produced biodiesel or and electric car?

The money you are spending on fossil fuel energy is going to the worst people on the planet. How does that make you feel?

In other words, how about putting your money where your mouth is? Corporate America is covered in bogus greenwashing - I really don't want to see individuals adopting the same mentality (GO SOLAR! stickers on Hummers).

Or you can sit around imagining things - I like to imagine that I will someday meet some aliens with a flying saucer who will take me on a tour of the solar system - wouldn't that be cool?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Cruel Irony
Posted by: bcain on Apr 29, 2008 7:15 AM   
Current rating: 2    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The cruel irony is that we haven't needed oil except as a lubricant for decades. Answers about the energy crisis will not be found within the same framework that has been established to keep most of us enslaved in the first place.

Alternative forms of energy have been known in the black world for decades, but the release of this information would alter the geo-political imbalance that those in control are loathe to relinquish.

Stop looking at this problem through conventional means, and start doing your homework.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Do What You Can
Posted by: Southern Gal on Apr 29, 2008 7:27 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Change your own lifestyle, work to educate and influence your neighbors and set an example, work with your local government, continue to contact and press your state and national representatives and senators regarding financial support and policies that call for alternative sources of energy. It takes ordinary citizens interacting with others to make challenging ideas more acceptable and the norm in communities and society at large.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Do What You Can Posted by: e rice
A lot of BS
Posted by: sre on Apr 29, 2008 8:08 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
In the US, we do as we want. We'll have higher prices, but not much other effect on the economy or our lifestyle. Maybe in 100 or 200 years it will matter, not now. Who cares about the rest of the world?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: A lot of BS Posted by: sunlakedude
» RE: A lot of BS Posted by: Squarehead
Some people already have
Posted by: afrothetics2 on Apr 29, 2008 8:12 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The poor are invisible. Whenever reports of an economic downturn, such as a recession, are published you won't find them in front of a camera telling it like it is. No one wants to hear the "really bad news." I've always used a simple formula, if it's a recession for the political elite, it's a depression for the rest of us. What's it's like for the poor? Try asking them, they haven't used oil in years.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

By the way, you don't have to "imagine" living in a world without petroleum. Read below.
Posted by: maxpayne on Apr 29, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
http://www.informationdistillery.com/hemp.htm

The Many Uses of Hemp
by Margot Collins

Hemp is one of the most useful plants on Earth.

For thousands of years, humans have used parts of the hemp plant for food, textiles, paper, fabric, and fuel oil. Today, modern processing technologies have made it possible to create alternatives to gasoline, plastic, and other petroleum products that can help the human race lessen its reliance on polluting and expensive fossil fuels.

The hemp plant is a renewable resource that can be produced domestically. It grows quickly, naturally resists plant diseases, requires little weeding, thrives in most climates, and enriches the soil it grows in.

Here are some of its most important applications:

...

Fuel

For centuries, Hemp oil was used as lamp oil. It began to be phased out in America in the 1870s when petroleum was introduced.

Today, hemp oil can be used to create biofuels to replace gasoline for diesel engines. Unlike fossil fuels, biofuels are renewable and produce less of the greenhouse gas carbon monoxide.

Plastic Alternatives

Standard plastic is made from fossil fuels using toxic chemicals. Almost everything we buy is wrapped in cellophane and our landfills are full of it. A variety of alternatives to plastic can be made from hemp.

In 1941, Henry Ford held a media event where he swung an axe at a prototype car body made of hemp and other plant material to prove its strength. The technology was never put into mass production, cars continued to be made of steel, and plastics made from petrochemicals became the norm.

Fortunately, the number of available products made from hemp plastics is on the increase as awareness of the importance of developing sustainable alternatives grows.

...

Hemp's Past and Future

If hemp is so useful and practical, why hasn't everyone heard of it? The answer lies primarily in politics. In the United States, growing hemp is largely prohibited and there is a great fear around it due to its resemblance to marijuana. Hemp may look like marijuana, however it does not contain the active chemicals that cause mind-altering effects.

Historically, hemp was important in America and several of the founding fathers grew it on their estates. Thomas Jefferson himself said, "Hemp is of first necessity to the wealth and protection of the country." There were times when farmers were legally required to grow it. During World War Two, the American government encouraged farmers to grow it to help aid the war effort.

In the 1930s, a "reefer madness" campaign began in the United States to stir up fear around marijuana and hemp. Today it is clear that these beginnings of "the war on drugs" were pushed into being by the newspaper, cotton, and petroleum industries which have all benefited financially from hemp prohibition. There are many people in the United States working to make growing hemp legal, however for the time being the laws remain restrictive.

In Canada, the cultivation of hemp has been allowed by the federal government since 1998 with a special license. Fortunately, as hemp becomes a growing agricultural sector in Canada and other countries, the availability of hemp based products will continue to grow worldwide.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What happened...
Posted by: Feltixx on Apr 29, 2008 9:53 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I remember back in the late 70s... What happened to the commercials and public service anouncements to conserve energy and clean up our planet? What happened to the calls for new energy sources and new ways to use and conserve what we have? What happened to "American Ingenuity"? In a nutshell I guess... What the hell happened to common sense? There was a poll done in my region recently that asked people if the higher gas prices had effected their driving habits. Almost 70% said they had made no changes to the way or amount that they drive! It just amazes me. Wouldn't it be interesting to see what would happen if the demand for gasoline dropped by about 15 or 20% or more over the course of a month or two. I can see it happening, just not quickly enough. Over the weekend I stopped at a gas station / market to buy some groceries and there was not one person there buying gas. (very unusual) Not only that, but I'm noticing less cars on the roads around here even. On that same trip I passed a total of two cars... at like 7:00 pm too. It was eerily quiet outside the gas station too with no cars driving by. I just wish it would spread quicker. Many say that the average person can't do anything about it, well I say do what you can, however little it may seem. A few million like-minded "little" persons really could bring about change.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: What happened... Posted by: AkamaiAthiest
Here's the choice your family faces