Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Food Riots Erupt Worldwide

By Anuradha Mittal, AlterNet. Posted April 25, 2008.


It's time to stop worshiping at the altar of 'market forces.'

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Anuradha Mittal

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

Food riots are erupting all over the world. To prevent them and to help people afford the most basic of goods, we need to understand the causes of skyrocketing food prices and correct the policies that have fueled them.

World food prices rose by 39 percent in the last year. Rice alone rose to a 19-year high in March -- an increase of 50 per cent in two weeks alone -- while the real price of wheat has hit a 28-year high.

As a result, food riots erupted in Egypt, Guinea, Haiti, Indonesia, Mauritania, Mexico, Senegal, Uzbekistan and Yemen. For the 3 billion people in the world who subsist on $2 a day or less, the leap in food prices is a killer. They spend a majority of their income on food, and when the price goes up, they can't afford to feed themselves or their families.

Analysts have pointed to some obvious causes, such as increased demand from China and India, whose economies are booming. Rising fuel and fertilizer costs, increased use of bio-fuels and climate change have all played a part.

But less obvious causes have also had a profound effect on food prices.

Over the last few decades, the United States, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund have used their leverage to impose devastating policies on developing countries. By requiring countries to open up their agriculture market to giant multinational companies, by insisting that countries dismantle their marketing boards and by persuading them to specialize in exportable cash crops such as coffee, cocoa, cotton and even flowers, they have driven the poorest countries into a downward spiral.

In the last thirty years, developing countries that used to be self-sufficient in food have turned into large food importers. Dismantling of marketing boards that kept commodities in a rolling stock to be released in event of a bad harvest, thus protecting both producers and consumers against sharp rises or drops in prices, has further worsened the situation.

Here's what we must do to prevent an epidemic of starvation from breaking out.

First, it is essential to have safety nets and public distribution systems put in place. Donor countries should provide more aid immediately to support government efforts in poor countries and respond to appeals from U.N. agencies, which are desperately seeking $500 million by May 1.

Second, we should help affected countries develop their agricultural sectors to feed more of their own people and decrease their dependence on food imports. We should promote production and consumption of local crops raised by small, sustainable farms instead of growing cash crops for western markets. And we should support a country's effort to manage stocks and pricing so as to limit the volatility of food prices.

To embrace these crucial policies, however, we need to stop worshipping the golden calf of the so-called free market and embrace, instead, the principle of food sovereignty. Every country and every people have a right to food that is affordable. When the market deprives them of this, it is the market that has to give.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: imf, world bank, wto, food shortages

Anuradha Mittal is executive director of the Oakland Institute.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
Terrorist
Posted by: HeKnew on Apr 25, 2008 12:31 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Over population is the common denominator.

Direct Democracy

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Actually, the market decides Posted by: ReallyBearish
» RE: Terrorist Posted by: Spot
The WTO Must be Scrapped ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 25, 2008 12:41 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It is the WTO that makes countries pry open their domestic food markets to grow cash crops for repayment of World Bank and IMF loans. It is the WTO that forces countries to accept subsidized crops from Europe and the United States that wipe out local farmers opening up huge land grabs for oligarchy and transnational corporations sending farmers penniless into the cities to scrape by on a few dollars a day.

The WTO with its Court can sue countries for damages not only caused but future damages as well ! These damages are then collected by the Bank for International Settlements. Countries have no choice but to comply or have their assets frozen and be isolated from any kind of trade whatsoever.

The WTO must be scrapped. In its place a system of tariffs whereby each and every country has the right to protect their agriculture and fund their health care and education without outside influence. Now the WTO can demand that programs for healthcare and education be scrapped to pay for loans and judgments !

Tariffs must be allowed to help local farmers with subsidies for production. Transnational corporations can launder their profits through daisy chains of shell companies located in tax free countries through banks with little or no transparency leaving poor countries with few legal resources no chance of collecting a fair share of taxes.

The WTO is already dead in the water.. The Doha round of trade agreements have been soundly rejected by countries that have broken free of the bondage of the world Bank and the IMF. It is past time we give countries, including our own, back the sovereignty that protects human rights, indeed peoples lives from starvation, exploitation, debt servitude and hopelessness.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The WTO Must be Scrapped ... Posted by: richholland
Two Thoughts
Posted by: Sissy on Apr 25, 2008 4:14 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I believe this is going to get worse because farmers are now raising corn for the incredibly nonsensical Ethanol program. You've heard about that, it's the total "non-answer" to the energy crisis. Because corn is reaping so much profits for the farmer, very few of the fields are growing wheat and I heard recently that it is predicted in a few years we will be paying as much as $9.00 a loaf for bread.

The other point I would like to make is that someone made what I thought was an absolutely brilliant "suggestion". That "suggestion" being that the food producing countries of the world form a "food cartel" much like the oil cartel. Where oil is produced, food is not, mayhap they might be "inspired" to have reasonable oil prices in order to feed their people. It will never happen of course because it would make too much sense. Any government who puts forth such a program as what is going to be the Ethanol debachle, would never think that such an idea might be worthy to even consider.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Two Thoughts Posted by: fanny666
...note the demographic...
Posted by: dave1616 on Apr 25, 2008 5:15 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
WHY?? www.strategytalk.org
"usa & the America's"
"my bi-racial american experience"

see also, www.discussrace.com

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why am I not surprised?
Posted by: gsmiley on Apr 25, 2008 5:25 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Every disaster from the Ruandan genocide to the collapse of past civilizations has been blamed on some political, military, geologic or climatic anomaly. If only people would share the wealth, grow the right crops or worship the right gods they could live lives of peace and comfort. There seems to be some defectin the human intellect that cannot conceive of the possibility that there could be too many of us and our exponentially growing demands on our world make ultimate disaster a certainty. The only uncertainty is the 'anomaly' by which we will mark the inevitable.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Why am I not surprised? Posted by: atheistcable
Excellent Article
Posted by: Gravitas on Apr 25, 2008 5:43 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That gets at the real reason behind the crisis. We as humans need to make sure a decent standard of living is our FIRST priority!!! Making it possible for the power-elite to hoard profits should be way way down on the list. Until this happens, the planet will never have any peace!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: xcellent Article Posted by: crystaljim
» RE: xcellent Article Posted by: crystaldave
Higher food prices will make small-farming profitable
Posted by: janvdb on Apr 25, 2008 6:12 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Food prices are high for the same reason oil and copper prices are high -- there are too many humans and not enough stuff.

We must allow the market to adjust prices higher, if we want increased supplies of food.

We need to feed people, but at the same time, we must provide security and birth control to prevent outbreaks of war and to stabilize the situation for the future.

If we simply feed people, we will merely be building our own Gaza and end up living in a bigger Israel. Good medical care must also be provided, along with employment and empowerment for women. To address the underlying problem.

At the same time, we rich must reduce our numbers. The much-vaunted problems of the "aging of society" are nothing compared to the problems of overpopulation. Everyone does NOT need a child.

Jan VanDenBerg

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Food for Everyone
Posted by: DaraLynn on Apr 25, 2008 6:41 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
When the day comes that every person has what every other person has, then there will be peace. Also, pigs will fly, unicorns will roam the earth and men will no longer kill to possess what another has. Sadly, I don't see that happening in my lifetime. The nature of the beast is to want what someone else has and for many, it's not outside their realm of possibility to kill for it. Sharing is another concept that falls outside the scope of understanding for a lot of people. We learn to share in kindergarten and immediately after, real life kicks our butt and takes our toys. We spend the rest of our lives working for 'things' and a nice, pricey 'vault' for those things. Heaven help the one that enters the 'vault' without permission and tries to take our things. Most of us would probably share our things, if we were asked. Just don't try to come and take it.

That old system of bartering for goods could make a comeback if there was anyone with real sense running this show. Food and water for oil - now there's a thought...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» Missed the point Posted by: frantaylor
xtiml
Posted by: xtiml on Apr 25, 2008 6:53 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
so these so smarty pants elite are no good at farming? pshaw, this is a contrived shortage , the yallways pull this shit, take away independance the n screw the m over, it is tire soiem watching the same old script being used and same old people getting manipulated and screwed every time. G.M. food is a poison, and they are pushing it big time.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

How market manipulation and unfair trade allows speculators to set prices.
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 25, 2008 7:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Let's take an ongoing specific example to use here: soybean prices in Indonesia.

Indonesian tempeh makers struggle as soybean prices rise
Mon Feb 4, 2008 7:31pm EST Reuters


"The price of imported soybeans has more than doubled to 7,600 rupiah a kg from a year ago, driven by concerns about dwindling U.S. stockpiles and fears that dry weather could reduce soybean output in Argentina, the world's third-biggest soy producer.

In a bid to contain surging food prices, the Indonesian government on Friday announced that it would subsidize the price of soybean for six months, to the tune of 1,000 rupiah a kilogram.

In Indonesia, many tempeh producers run small family- or individually-owned stalls, and they have found it difficult to pass on the higher cost of ingredients to regular customers.


Okay - the price doubles. How can that happen? Imagine going to the pumps tomorrow and gas is $8 a gallon - overnight - and a loaf of bread costs $10. Surprise!

"Sunaryo has been making fermented soybean cakes for over three decades in a small windowless room filled with smoke from fire on which he boils the beans.

He says his earnings have halved to 50,000 rupiah ($5.40) a day after the price of imported soybean nearly doubled this month from a year ago, forcing him to shut his workshop for three days and lay off his lone helper."


So, who sets the price of soybeans in Indonesia? Who controls the market? Where is the local competition that will sell soybeans when the imported soybeans become to pricey?

The country imports 70 percent of its soybean demand of 2 million tonnes a year, mostly from the United States, the world's top exporter of soybean.

So, how did that situation arise? Why would a small nation be importing soybeans from the U.S.? Why not sell soybeans to the U.S.,and import, say, solar panels from Japan?

Indonesia depended almost entirely on local soybeans until the late 1990s when imported beans first flooded the market as a result of International Monetary Fund-driven reforms, in which the state procurement agency lost its monopoly.

The influx of cheaper soybean imports, lack of incentives for farmers and poor farming practices reduced local soybean output to 608,230 tonnes in 2007, from a peak of 1.87 million tonnes in 1992.


Let's run that by again:
Indonesia depended almost entirely on local soybeans until the late 1990s when imported beans first flooded the market as a result of International Monetary Fund-driven reforms.

That's a case example - Mexico is the same, Africa is the same, many other places are in similar binds. Right now, the subprime fraudsters have dumped their ill-gotten gains into commodities, driving up the price - and with a captive market, everyone has to pay, pay, pay.

They'd be far better off without U.S. imports and the IMF and World Bank screwing them over on a daily basis - but that would go against the imperial designs of the U.S. State Deparment, the Pentagon, the Oval Office and the Congress - and a whole lot of American retirees who need that steady cash flow from the foreign colonies to maintain themselves in palatial luxury.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» great post. Posted by: fanny666
We should have thought about this before we let the bankers....
Posted by: Prophit on Apr 25, 2008 7:25 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
... kick our generational farmers off their land. Now we are dependant on foreign growers for our food. We did that, no one else. We let our reps allow it. Once we get back to growing our own food again, we will solve this problem.

It was bound to happen because we are ignorant of how this works. We let a handful of people control our food and now with new legislation these same people will control our water and we are toast after that.

It has nothing to do with Population numbers and everything to do with control. Don't believe me??? Check this out.....

1. Legislation in congress gives control of all fresh water to the Army corp of engineers.

2. Organic standards for foods has been turned over to the FDA.

3. Legislation passed congress that forces ALL AMERICANS to register their domestic animals in this country by 2009 and if you don't its a $1000 per day fine. Once registered they are no longer called "domestic animals" rather "shared resources".

4. Monsanto has garnered the market on seeds to all farmers international except Europe who refused to allow them in or to use their land to test them. This ensures Monsanto total control over what is grown and who grows it.

There is more, but do some DAMN RESEARCH and get the big picture here. This is no silly game, this is intentional. Supposedly, according to this administration we will have food riots in Sept and martial law will be declared. I believe once we pass that fact around we have a chance to stop them, but if we say nothing, it will be the order of the day.

I am sure we can count on Blackwater to start those riots, don't you think so????

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Dont you dare blame this on market principles
Posted by: Iconoclast421 on Apr 25, 2008 7:51 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is a direct and predicted result of the Federal Reserve's policies of currency destruction. And also the direct and predicted result of the US government's love of ethanol. And also the direct and predicted result of the peaking of global oil and natural gas production.

None of it has much to do with the free market because all of these issues result from some form of corruption of the market. Either by the Fed's manipulations, the government's stupid ethanol mandates and subsidies, or the CFR media hiding the facts about energy and exponential growth from the people.

Also, you may want to cool it on the melodramitcs. I mean gimme a break... Food Riots! Agghhhh! Run for your lives.

Who are you kidding? The real stuff hasnt even begun yet. You may want to save your flashiest headlines for WTSHTF.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Hispaniola
Posted by: biff777 on Apr 25, 2008 8:25 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The things the coorporate media never tell you.
informationclearinghouse.info
big sugar

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Not the first time.
Posted by: doubter on Apr 25, 2008 8:28 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Check out: Late Victorian Holocausts: El Niño Famines and the Making of the Third World by Mike Davis.
Its subject is nothing less than the creation of what we now call "The Third World," through a complex series of seemingly disparate natural and market-related events beginning in the 1870s. Davis dives into the data and journalism of the period with a vengeance, showing that the seemingly unprecedented droughts across northern Africa, India and China in the 1870s and 1890s are consistent with what we now know to be El Ni¤o's effects, and that it was political and market forces (which are never impersonal, Davis insists), and not a lack of potential stores and transportation, that kept grain from the more than 50 million people who starved to death.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

high food and fuel costs? It's called INFLATION
Posted by: ReallyBearish on Apr 25, 2008 8:45 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
people rioting over food costs? Gee, with inflation at a measly 4 percent how could that be?

Actually, the inflation rate is more like 13 percent without the statistical "corrections" from Washington.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The hour is getting late
Posted by: Rob_Dietz on Apr 25, 2008 9:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Global worship of economic growth (meaning increasing populations and increasing consumption as a matter of policy) is sending us down the wrong path. Rising commodity prices and mounting food shortages are the latest, and most serious, signs of our faulty economic systems. It is time to find an alternative path that takes into account the productive limitations of Earth's ecosystems. That path is the steady state economy. It is time to get a moving on the transition to a sustainable economy. To show support, sign the position on economic growth at CASSE Position.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The US isn't having food shortages... yet.
Posted by: Quannah on Apr 25, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
But in the Third World, the shortages are real. Meaning real people are starving because they can't afford a bag of rice. If they could get one.

This won't stay a "Third World problem," either. It will eventually come home to roost. The fact is, there isn't as much arable land in the world as there used to be. Much of it has been taken out of production and used for other purposes. In this country, land that used to be used for farming (by generational farmers) is now full of unsightly subdivisions of cookie-cutter homes.

And our food is cheap (by world standards) because of farm subsidies. The entire system of food production is broken. And millions of people will die because of this. And for what? Perhaps to make Monsanto even more obscenely rich?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Power-Elite and Population Control
Posted by: ronheri on Apr 25, 2008 10:05 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Everytime I read an article written by one of the wealthy families of the world, they try to tell us that we need to cull the population. Too many of us evil humans? I have a thought for Ted Turner, the Rocekefellers, and the Rothchilds and their ilk: Join hands with their family members, go to a high cliff somewhere and jump. There's enough food and land for all, just not those greedy-Eugenists. Good riddance to the bunch of them. They think they own the world. Ted Turner with his 5 kids, telling everyone else to keep it to 1. He's a good one to give advice!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A Sense of History
Posted by: BCcovers on Apr 25, 2008 10:17 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This has ALL happened before throughout even recent history. The Malthusian idea of over-population has been disproven time and time again throughout human history. It seems that many on this board neglect or purposefully omit human beings' constant technological development which has bailed us out of these situations in the past. Have faith, we are mismanging our resources, (eg, the stupid ethanol mess)but we are now learning from this and will rectify the situation. How do I know this? Because we have before, ONE HUNDRED PERCENT OF THE TIME. We are currently growing enough food to feed the world easily, it is just being mis-allocated. Furthermore the amount of arible (sp?) land being used in this country alone is probably only 20% of capacity. I live in the northeast, and even here we still have a wealth of "open spaces", let alone how open the praries still are. Or the Russian steppes, or the entire undeveloped and misused continent of Africa.

It appears that a lot of people here hope that there is over-population as it fits their politics well. Communism, de-evolution technologically speaking, and "an easy life for all" seems to be the interests of these neo-malthusians. Those of you who don't fit into these categories; keep some perspective, do some research, and be skeptical of people who "can't wait for the sky to fall". neo-Malthusian progressive are simply acting like Fundamentalist Christians excited about the Rapture coming.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» we need open space Posted by: stilldreaming
Oxfam takes on global food crisis
Posted by: fanny666 on Apr 25, 2008 10:51 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Oxfam takes on global food crisis

Oxfam is one of the best charities, this is a good place to put your rebate check, if you can.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Food as Currency
Posted by: westomoon on Apr 25, 2008 11:55 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Did nobody read the article AlterNet ran yesterday? "Step Aside Dollar, Is Rice the New Global Currency?" describes how countries with huge money surpluses are using their madly-deflating US dollars to buy & stockpile grain. You really should check it out: http://www.alternet.org/audits/83345/?page=entire

Food is just another addition to hedge-fund-ization of life's necessities. Since oil started being futures-traded as a commodity, its price has become detached from the simple law of supply and demand, though that law is always trotted out as a justification for price rises. If you've been reading your AlterNet, you know about the worldwide commoditization and privatization of water. It's pure capitalism run mad, unchecked and lethal. Now food is being used as a form of bankable currency, instead of for its proper purpose.

P.S. To the pooh-poohers of Malthus -- the world's biggest population growth is occurring in the parts least able to feed it. Surely you can at least see that, if your country lives on the edge of starvation, quadrupling its population is not a good idea? As to the total population of the world -- remember Wile E. Coyote in the old Road Runner cartoons? When he ran off a cliff, he'd keep going for awhile, then suddenly look down and realize he was in mid-air, at which point he'd plummet to the ground. I figger we're just at the looking-down-and-realizing point.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Results of Policies
Posted by: Southern Gal on Apr 25, 2008 12:55 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Starving children are the results of policies. It may be the policies of their own governments or other countries' governments or those of organizations like the World Trade Organization. How can we call ourselves civilized when we allow children to starve? They are the innocents in this world. We need sane policies that provide for limiting population growth (yes that means birth control), that allow countries to feed their people before they export food to other countries and that provide help to those countries caught in severe drought and other conditions that limit their opportuntities to feed their people. We need to put resources into better ways of growing food, rather than putting them into massive armies and weapons of destruction. When I say we, I mean we as human beings.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The new hedge fund
Posted by: shoosta on Apr 25, 2008 2:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The so-called food shortage may not really be a shortage at all. Dealers in the commodities market are perhaps more responsinble for this current crisis than the dreadful WTO. Commodity traders are the real culprits behind the surge in fuel prices as well. This market is being manipulated just as the stock markets are manipulated. We grow rice in California. Lots of it. there is no shortage of this commodity in the U.S. at all. In fact, we have a glut. An organic grower here just yesterday stated that the prices offered to growers for the past few years have been unspeakably low. Now becasuse of these artificial shortage, prices paid to growers have skyrocketed. Investment and manipulation of the commodities market ( as in the Chicago Board of Trade) has become the new hedge fund. All those trillions of dollars in profits made off of the sub-prime hedge funds have to be re-invested somewhere.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We can double our land area devoted to food crops
Posted by: AsteroidMiner on Apr 25, 2008 8:54 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
by not growing tobacco and other things that aren't food.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Rich People are so smart, the best qualified...
Posted by: DaBear on Apr 25, 2008 11:44 PM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This is why rich people cannot be put in charge of things. Ever.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The NAFTA Debacle
Posted by: Deacon Elurby on Apr 26, 2008 5:17 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
#######
#######

“Because many nations’ agricultural
production will decline under NAFTA
and GATT, in becoming dependent on
the more productive nations’ capacity
to export cheaper product to them,
they’ll become gravely vulnerable to
any of the exporting nations’ food-
production declines, possibly resulting
from bad weather conditions or bad
economies. ‘Free trade’ in food sets up
a looming catastrophe (read my essay,
GATT: Ubiquitous Treason)…Wouldn’t such
worldwide economic interdependence
necessarily set the stage for a worldwide
economic collapse should any one nation
seriously falter? Such a worldwide collapse
would make America’s Great Depression
appear like good times. Why aren’t the
NAFTA and GATT crafters arguing for more
economic independence for nations - for
rugged individualism among nations – rather
than building this One World interdependency
that their brand of ‘free trade’ necessarily
engenders?”

The NAFTA Debacle (1995)
http://naftadebacle1.blogspot.com/

Planned Destruction of America
http://planneddestructionofamerica.blogspot.com/

The Population Bomb and China
http://foundersamerica72.blogspot.com/

#######
#######

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

GROW YOUR OWN FOOD NOW
Posted by: cyr3n on Apr 28, 2008 4:05 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Start growing your own food now! Store seeds. Set up several aeroponic systems, in 18-gal totes and grow a sustenance farm before its too late. Who will feed your family when the last can of food isnt restocked at the store due to striking truckers? How will you get home when highways are blocked with protesters or stalled cars on empty?

In the 20's, they went from drinking champagne one day to eating stray cats the following week. Don't be dumb. Don't depend on other people (government, utility workers) to go to their 9-5 jobs when the shit hits the fan.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

food riots
Posted by: pfm on Apr 30, 2008 11:59 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It strikes me that until “we” – that’s you and me – become “aware” and choose to be accountable and responsible for our individual actions altering the current food chaos is a pipe-dream. As long as “we” continue to believe the illusions created, perpetrated, fostered and consistently fed 24/7 to us in jingoistic style by for-profit-corporations-in-consort-with-government nothing will change. “We” believe the corporate fairy tale of free lunches, pillaging and plundering every aspect of our common biosphere, unrestricted polluting of our air and water, then conveniently pointing our collective finger and blaming them. The reality is, “we” are them…! “We” daily pay homage at the altar of the few, the elite, those profiteers and plunderers of our common environment. In the words of Pogo … we have met the enemy and he is us . . . !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]