Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Labor's First Strike Against the War Gains Momentum

By Kevin Tillman, AlterNet. Posted April 24, 2008.


Vermont Union offers strong endorsement of West Coast long-shoremen's action.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by Kevin Tillman

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 

The following is a release put out by the Vermont AFL-CIO, with thanks to reader Richard M. for sending it along ...

The Executive Board of the Vermont AFL-CIO, representing thousands of workers in countless sectors across Vermont, have unanimously passed an historic resolution expressing their "unequivocal" support for the first US labor strike against the war in Iraq.

Montpelier, VT -The Executive Board of the Vermont AFL-CIO, representing thousands of workers in countless sectors across Vermont, have unanimously passed an historic resolution expressing their "unequivocal" support for the first US labor strike against the war in Iraq. The strike, being organized by the Longshore Caucus of the International Longshore & Warehouse Union (ILWU), will seek to shutdown all west coast ports for a period of 8 hours on the day of May 1st 2008. The Vermont AFL-CIO is the first state labor federation to publicly back the Longshoremen; other state federations are expected to follow.

The resolution, among other things, calls the war in Iraq "immoral, unwanted, and unnecessary", states that the vast majority of working Vermonters oppose the war, and contends that the war will only be brought to an end by "the direct actions of working people." Many other Vermont labor unions and organizations, including the Vermont Workers' Center, have also made official statements condemning the war.

The resolution also calls on working Vermonters to "discuss the actions of the Longshoremen, to wear anti-war buttons, and to take various actions of their own design and choosing in their workplace on May 1st, 2008."

"Workers in Vermont and all across this nation are against this war. We have already demanded that the government end it, but they have consistently failed to heed our words. Therefore working people are beginning to take concrete steps to make our resistance known. If the war does not immediately end we, the unions and working people of Vermont, will also be compelled to take appropriate action," said David Van Deusen, a District Vice President of the Vermont AFL-CIO.

Traven Leyshon, President of the Washington, Lamoille & Orange County Central Labor Council, AFL-CIO, said, "Vermont labor has long called for an end to this war. The untold billions being spent on the war could instead be used to address our domestic needs. It is working people who pay the cost of the war - in some cases with our lives, but always with our sacrifices."

Full text of the resolution after the jump ...

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: strike, iraq, labor

Joshua Holland is an editor and senior writer at AlterNet.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
General Strike
Posted by: EJW on Apr 24, 2008 8:20 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yeah, Vermont - a general strike against the war - Brilliant.

May Day - General Strike!!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: General Strike Posted by: peacefullaim
Good for the unions. Now will the MSM please cover this?
Posted by: AngryWhiteFemale on Apr 24, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I am self-employed. In solidarity with the unions' efforts, I will not spend a dime that day. And I will tell everyone what I am doing and why.

I have a feeling this won't get more than 20 seconds coverage on the national broadcast stations and will not make the front page of the major newspapers. It will be interesting to see how the LA Times treats it. Let's hope at least Olbermann covers it.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

What a great illustration of a couple of problems with Americ these days
Posted by: rickiey on Apr 24, 2008 11:47 AM   
Current rating: 1    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Striking against the war? Really?

Gee, I thought the point of unions was to take care of the WORKERS, not to dabble in politics.

Don't get me wrong, I'm very much against this war. I just think that the union strike against it is very inappropriate. You would think that with the economic crunch that is going on, they'd have a lot more on their plate that is actually their responsibility to take care of. Lets just ignore negotiating wages and focus on politics, eh?

But I truly understand them wanting to do something about the war. If only there was a group of people who were responsible for representing the public on issues such as the war, who could vote on defunding or stopping the war altogether...

Oh, wait, there is. But somehow, it's the same idiots that got is INTO the war in the first place.

Somehow our representatives, aren't representing us, so the unions are representing everything BUT workers rights...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

It's way past time
Posted by: Zenobia on Apr 24, 2008 6:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
General strikes and boycotts have seemed, since the lead up to the war, a far more useful tactic than marching in the streets, screaming to the wind. Protests are good for those of us IN the protests, so that we can verify our sanity and see that we are not alone. They are good for keeping people motivated to work for change, for networking and coalition building. But protests alone don't really DO much to change the ill. Bush himself said he didn't care about public opinion.

In a capitalist society, the only actions that seem to work are those that effect on economic terms.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Longshoremen Have Been Great Anti-War Supporters For Years..
Posted by: Turiye on Apr 25, 2008 1:50 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...and as a Vet and a woman Labor and Union have always marched along side us in protests against the Iraq Occupation, which they find as deplorable as we.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

EVERYBODY STOP
Posted by: alan1111 on Apr 25, 2008 2:39 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
If everybody in the entire country took May 1st to heart and just STOPPED spending for 24 hours think of the message that would send to the idiots in Washington.
I MEAN EVERYBODY.
if you can, call in sick and do not go to work.
if you drive a big rig and you can, don't drive on that day.
don't buy ANY gasoline on this day AT ALL, ANYWHERE.
don't buy any groceries from any store, especially Walmart.
don't run out and cash your "stimulous" check if you receive it this day, your bills will wait one more day to get paid.
if you live in a big city avoid mass transit if you can, Walk or ride a bike to dry up that source of revenue.
BE CREATIVE in ways NOT to spend your money for 24 hours.
It is not as hard as you think.
If one day does not do enough to gather their attention, well, it might be time to stock up, sit back and dig in for a much longer boycott.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: VERYBODY STOP Posted by: peacefullaim