Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

How the Right Hijacked America's Economic Model

By Thomas Palley, AlterNet. Posted April 19, 2008.


The capture of Keynesianism has been a gradual process.
Advertisement

Communist revolutionary Che Guevara rapidly became an inspirational figure for revolutionary socialist change after his execution in Bolivia in 1967. Forty years later, Che lives on but his image now adorns t-shirts that have become popular fashion statements. This transformation reflects the extraordinary power of markets to capture and transform, turning an avowed enemy of the market system into a profit opportunity.

The process of capture also holds for economic policy, which has witnessed the conservative capture of Keynesianism. This capture is now on display as U.S. policymakers struggle to contain the effects of a collapsing house price bubble that was recklessly funded by Wall Street. The sting is that the full powers of Keynesian policies are being invoked to save an economy that no longer generates Keynesian outcomes of full employment and shared prosperity.

The political economic philosophy of Keynesianism emerged after World War II following the catastrophic experience of the Great Depression. The new paradigm advocated an economy with full employment and shared prosperity, and gave government the critical role of regulating markets and adjusting monetary and fiscal policy to ensure levels of demand sufficient to generate full employment.

These Keynesian tools are now being applied forcefully. The Federal Reserve has dramatically cut its interest rate target in response to financial sector weakness. Its goal has been to shore up asset prices, prevent further financial losses, lower mortgage rates to make houses more affordable and prevent further defaults, and to stimulate spending by lowering the cost of capital. Moreover, the Fed has done this despite consumer price inflation being above four percent.

Simultaneously, the Bush administration has pushed for fiscal stimulus, albeit with its usual preference for tax cuts benefiting business and the rich that deliver little bang for buck. The Democratically controlled Congress has also gotten in on the act with stimulus packages that are better designed, but still contain plenty of expensive and relatively ineffective tax cuts.

On one level, policymakers are absolutely right taking these measures, as the costs of a financial and economic meltdown are so large. But true Keynesian policy would also address the failure to generate full employment and shared prosperity. The current U.S. economic expansion looks like being the first ever in which median household income fails to recover its previous peak. Job growth has been tepid for much of the time, and the employment-to-population ratio has remained well below its previous peak. This dismal experience comes on top of three decades of wage stagnation during which household income only grew because of longer working hours and having both household heads work.

The capture of Keynesianism has been a gradual process. In the 1950s military Keynesianism became the hallmark of American policy, with defense spending becoming a huge and permanent component of government spending, to the benefit of the war industry. President Reagan continued the process of capture, pushing rhetoric and policies that undermined working families while simultaneously running budget deficits that kept the lid on unemployment. In the last recession of 2001, the Bush administration again invoked Keynesian stimulus for tax cuts that contained minimal stimulus and were closer to looting of government finances.

In 1971 President Nixon famously declared "We are all Keynesians now." Nixon was half-right. Everyone recognizes the need and efficacy of Keynesian policy instruments, including conservatives who are happy to promote tax cuts and interest rate reductions to support asset prices. However, most have forgotten the Keynesian goals of full employment and shared prosperity.

The result is Keynesian policy instruments remain, but Keynesian policy goals have been abandoned. Both Democrats and Republicans are quick to push for Keynesian stimulus policies when financial stability is threatened, but most (including too many Democrats) are silent when the economy fails to deliver shared prosperity.

Keynesian full employment stimulus policies must be accompanied by Keynesian structural policies that ensure wages grow with productivity, thereby ensuring sustainable demand growth. These structural policies include labor and social insurance laws supportive of unions and worker bargaining power, and international economic policies that prevent inappropriate competition and unsustainable trade deficits. The conservative capture of Keynesianism has both obliterated these structural policies and put a brake on reaching for full employment.

Digg!

See more stories tagged with: keynesianism, conservative movement

Thomas Palley is the founder of the Economics for Democratic & Open Societies Project. Read more of his work at www.thomaspalley.com.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
The key to keynesianism is the emergence of a middle class
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Apr 19, 2008 11:52 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The ultimate resource for wealth and power are human work, creation and inventivness.
The mass critical tissue for acceptable human work, creativity and innovation comes from strong, large, prosperous and educated middle classes.
The stronger and larger the middle class is, the better are the prospects for a nation to keep wealth.
Nowadays whe are seeing that, due to ultra liberal market theology, along with state functions shrinking, and wrong political and economical choices on old pattern energies (fossil fuels), some phenomena occured:

1- The destruction of a legal, economical and political framework that, during two generations, protected the western middle classes. That destruction led to the "proletarisation" of the lower, and weaker, parts of those middle classes, and substancially weakened the rest.

2. Along with that dismembering in the west, the same capitals that fled production from the USA and Europe, led a perverse "development" in many countries of the so called "second" (former communists) and third world, based on the destruction, in the nest, of most of its emerging midlle classes. Some countries escaped that catastrophe, but the majority didn't.

3. The enormous induced appetite for oil, either because of the massive investment on its exploitation instead of investing in alternatives, and because of the consumist life patterns inevitabilly and endlessly inflated in order to support the "bubble".

4. Both that uninvestment in the people (the middle classes), and investment on old energies, lead to the capitals concentration in newly industrialised or energy producer countries and financial centers in eurasia, whose interests are not the same as ours.
Soon they will begin buying us out, with uncertain prospects.

5. The only way to stop that process would by creating trade and financial barriers, based on military might. Nowadays that prospect his unacceptable and disastrous. It would lead to a world war and, therefore, doom.

6. So, the new test for keynesianism will be the reconstruction of that framework for middle class protection, in a time that financial resources are no longer in europe and the USA, at least in its main part.

I think that would be an intersting point for political debate.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

We need a neo-Keynesian movement for progressive taxation, public investment and full employment now
Posted by: yellow on Apr 19, 2008 1:25 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
What is often ill appreciated in the Alternet threads is the extent to which credit creation and financialization is a means of sustaining the inherently stagnant late capitalist economy. The high levels of economic concentration and severe maldistribution of wealth that charactorize late capitalism has lead to stagnation and recession. Further financialization will only lead to deepening crisis and instability. We need a program of reform, redistribution and recovery now based on pubic investment in new sectors that can give us a whole new economy and stimulate growth through increased median incomes, a new middle class and production to meet the needs of society instead of maximizing profit for a few. This is the real implications of Keynes's ideas. Let's reclaim Keynesianism for the people!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

I'm dismayed
Posted by: saltoafronteira on Apr 20, 2008 12:34 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
That such an enourmosly important issue, is so ignored, even by alternet readers and commentators.
People ! The future of your nation lies in the way you crate a new keynesianism !

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Has humanity lost control over its creations? - Part I
Posted by: PaulC on Apr 20, 2008 7:57 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Palley said "Keynesian full employment stimulus policies must be accompanied by Keynesian structural policies that ensure wages grow with productivity, thereby ensuring sustainable demand growth".

The problem is that the corporate oligarchy recoils in horror at the mere thought of full employment with real wages. This has been their agenda for the past 28 years - economic "growth" through ever-increasing worker "productivity", which is a euphamism for working longer for less pay and ever-eroding benefits.

The result of such policies, combined with financialization due to deregulation as Yellow has said, has been the curious robust growth of the stock market even as the economic health of the nation as a whole steadily declines. This would be a problem for them if their concern was for the well-being of the United States, but that clearly is not their concern.

Quite to the contrary, their stated agenda is to "spear the belly of the beast" - to bankrupt the U.S. government, eviscerate its social and regulatory functions and turn the United States into a class state along the lines of Mexico or India. To accomplish this they employ massive debt spending on things such as war which have few monetary controls and lots of "patriotic" appeal. The latter is important because it satisfies one of the fundamental rules of marketing - position yourself as the opposite of your greatest weakness. For Republithugs that would mean positioning themselves as strong patriotic fiscal conservatives.

Neither does sending jobs overseas or moving corporate HQ overseas help this country, yet that is what they are doing, together with an all-out war on the unions, begun by their hero, Ronnie Raygun.

Or their assault on democracy at home (purging voters, stealing elections) and abroad (School of the Americas, Iraq Occupation).

But perhaps the greatest betrayal has been the wholesale transfer of our technological/industrial base to communist China. Was it not the Republithugs who so feared the communist threat to our sovereignty? What a laugh! It turned out that the greatest threat was from within.

(continued in Part II)

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Keynesian ~ Supply Side ... Two Sides of the Same Coin.
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 20, 2008 8:53 PM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
""However, we may very well be at a point of fundamental questions neither the New Deal or Neoliberalism care to ask. For in the end, New Deal and Neoliberal political economy are simply two sides of the same coin. They are a political and cultural school of thought that seeks one end, economic growth. Both ultimately depend on growth in the creation of jobs, growth in the production of goods and growth in consumption each year. They are a school of thought that depends on infinite resources from what every year becomes increasingly clear to the collective mind of humanity is a very finite planet. It is this fundamental contradiction that will increasingly move into the center of all debate on political economy and a question for which neither New Deal or Neoliberal economics has any answers."""

Wall Street and Washington Are Failing Spectacularly -- Where Do We Go?

I suggest the author read this article, all of it ... and the first comment ...Bankrupt Ideas ...

The tack this author has taken is obsolete in a finite world mired in debt.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]