Home
Archive
Newsletters
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise

Economist Fears Historic Loss of Assets for Minorities

By Sandip Roy, deleted. Posted April 19, 2008.


A warning that the current economic downturn could lead to the greatest loss of assets for communities of color that's ever happened.

Share and save this post:

      

      

Share on Facebook       

AlterNet Social Networks:
follow us on twitter
find us on Facebook

In Special Coverage

Belief:
Is Blind Faith in God and the Bible a Modern Invention?
Devilstower

Corporate Accountability and WorkPlace:
Who's Paying for the Recession Most of All? Young Workers
Lizzy Ratner

DrugReporter:
Lies About Marijuana Drive People to a Much More Harmful Drug -- Booze
Steve Fox

Environment:
Why Max Baucus' 'No' Vote on the Climate Bill May Really Help Its Passage
Jeff Mcmahon

Food:
Soda Helps Make Americans Unhealthy and Fat -- Will Soda Tax Prevail Despite Pushback by Beverage Industry?
Christine Spolar, Joseph Eaton

Health and Wellness:
Do We Really Want to Enshrine Insurance Monopoly into Law? This and 5 Other Complaints About the Health Bill
John Nichols

Immigration:
NYC Marathon Raises Question of Who Is American Enough?
James E. Johnson, Jr.

Media and Technology:
How Biased Media Can Brainwash You
Melinda Burns

Movie Mix:
The Yes Men: Pranksters Out to Fix the World
Mark Engler

Politics:
4 Ways the Stupak Amendment Deprives Women of Access to Abortion
Jessica Arons

Reproductive Justice and Gender:
How the Stupak Amendment Radically Undermines Women's Rights
Rachel Morris

Rights and Liberties:
"Women Are Being Killed All Over the World": One Reporter's Fight Against So-Called "Honor Killings"
Robert S. Eshelman

Sex and Relationships:
9 Silly Things People Say When They Hear You Don't Want Kids (And Ways to Counter Them)
Liz Langley

Take Action:
G-20 Meetings: Nothing Much Happened in the Suites, and There Was Too Much Punch in the Streets
Laura Flanders

Water:
Why Natural Gas Is Not a Clean Energy Panacea
Stan Cox

World:
10 Suicides a Month at Ft. Hood -- War Stress Is Taking Soldiers to the Brink
Dahr Jamail

More stories by Sandip Roy

Advertisement
Upcoming AlterNet stories on Digg

Editor's Note: The current economic downturn could lead to the greatest loss of assets for communities of color that's ever happened, says Alan Fisher, executive director of the California Reinvestment Coalition since 1992, which advocates for the right of low-income communities and communities of color to have fair and equal access to banking and other financial services. Alan Fisher was interviewed by NAM Editor and host of UpFront, Sandip Roy.

Whether we call it a recession or not, what's the effect of what's happening in the economy on the low-income communities who are part of your coalition?

I think low-income people and people of color have been struggling for many years now. The "recovery" has not helped them. Recent reports say that income levels for families are the same dollar-wise as they were in 2000, which means they are worth much less now. Food prices are going up, gas prices are going up and we have a huge housing crisis.

How many people are impacted by the housing crisis?

The housing crisis doesn't just impact those who are in the homes that are in trouble -- who in California may be half a million households -- but it impacts all of their neighbors and their city. Their neighbors' houses lose value, as their houses lose value. The cities are losing tax base, our whole state has been relying on home sales to keep going. The state says it has an $18 billion deficit in a fiscal year that ends June 30. I think we are in a deep crisis and whatever the economists may call it, regular people are suffering and having great difficulty.

Can you give an example of how regular people are suffering and what are the first signs of recession in these communities?

I think the signs of recession are people having to cut back on the basic things that they buy, on less meat, not being able to buy clothes for their children -- but much of this has been masked because of easy access to credit cards. Many people are in huge debt on their credit cards and have substituted those, or have taken out payday loans, to try to keep going. So, it's a dangerous situation that's been masked by the wealth of the most wealthy -- corporate profits -- while the people who are our neighbors are in tremendous trouble.

But wouldn't something like a recession rip this mask off, with the way people have been relying on credit cards and payday lenders to get by?

I think, whether we call it a recession or not, that it would be something that happens as people are unable to pay their credit card bills, as people are being forced to go into bankruptcy. With the new bankruptcy laws, it's even more punitive. Yet at the same time bankruptcies are going up.

Homelessness is also on the rise. There are many people who are tenants in homes, and if those homes are foreclosed on, then, even though they pay their rent every month, they are forced out. They don't get their security deposit back, and where do they go to look for housing? Rental prices are going up, so it's a tremendous squeeze on families.

There has been so much coverage of homeowners, but we haven't seen much on what has been the impact of the economic downturn on tenants.

I think we are just beginning to hear that. It's sort of hidden because you don't see it in the same aggregated fashion. We know it's happening; we're hearing it more and more. We're hearing from homeless organizations that it's impacting folks that are becoming homeless, but there are no numbers at this point that I know of.

Are you seeing a new profile of homeless people? Are homeless organizations reporting on new kinds of people who are becoming homeless and are coming to them for help?

I think it's just starting, so I haven't heard that yet. I've heard concerns about tenants and we've tried to get state legislature to do something about tenants, but the opposition from the mortgage industry and the bankers pushed it out of the bill.

Why are the mortgage industries opposing measures about tenants?

Because they want the houses, they want people out immediately, and they want to try to sell them again and recoup their money. As you can see from the Bear Stearns rescue, the concern is about the corporations at the federal level because of campaign financing. So no one cares that people are being forced out of their homes because these people aren't the big contributors; they might be written off as not even voting.

Where else would you be looking for to see the cracks, the great pressures that communities are going to be subjected to as result of the downturn?

What's caught my eye is that the city of Vallejo, Calif. almost went bankrupt, and it's still on the edge of that. They went bankrupt because they were paying their workers a decent wage. The governor took away the vehicle tax money when he first came into office, which meant that police and fire -- the most basic things that every city needs to have -- got cut.

You hear about libraries that are being closed down. They're talking about closing the parks; education and health care are being cut back by the governor. I think it's the whole infrastructure of society that's under attack. In a way, it's so large that it's hard for people even to take in what it means.

With the foreclosure crisis, for example, I've heard that one of the interesting things was that it was affecting both African-American communities and Latino communities really hard, but in different ways. African Americans were being affected mostly because they were existing homeowners who had refinanced their homes, not understanding the terms. For Latinos it was more of a language issue. First-time buyers had locked themselves into mortgages that they were not going to be able to pay. The results were the same -- both of them were losing homes -- but the way they were getting there was different. In cases of the economic downturn and recession, do you see that affecting different communities differently?

I think, as you are saying, the reasons for things may be different. The Asian-American and Pacific-Islander community -- the Korean Americans and Vietnamese Americans may be coming to home ownership later, like Latinos. It will have a broad impact, but I think each community is different in how it's going on.

But I know it's generally agreed that there's tremendous concern that this could be the greatest loss of assets for communities of color that's ever happened. We've all seen an increase in home ownership, but it was filled with fraud and greed on the part of the real estate industry and so people are in trouble now.

These communities are also reliant on payday lenders, especially poor communities, and I know your organization studies that. Have you seen any spike in payday lender abuse as a result of this downturn?

One of the difficulties with all of the statistics is that they're late. So, all we know about really is last year and that doesn't show a huge increase. But we are hearing that people are increasingly going to payday lenders, which are the lenders of last resort. We have a bill that we hope can make it through the legislature, to cap their interest rates.

The Federal Reserve has been taking some steps to avoid foreclosures; the state government is doing something. How would you grade their efforts?

I think the state government, the Federal Reserve, the federal legislature, the federal government are all making efforts that will have no large impact on the homeowner. Clearly, the federal government and the Federal Reserve had looked at large corporations and are concerned about that infrastructure. The predictions, which are probably very low, are that two million people could lose their homes. There's nothing that's comparable to that and many of the bills that would have really made a difference have been cut back in the legislature. There was an effort to try and soften the impact of bankruptcy on people, and that was soundly defeated by the corporate interests. There's been nothing that really can help people, and meanwhile thousands of people are losing their homes every week.

Digg!    Share on facebook   submit to reddit    Bookmark on Delicious   Stumble This  

See more stories tagged with: minorities, subprime mortgage crisis, foreclosure

Sandip Roy (sandip@pacificnews.org) is host of "Upfront," the Pacific News Service weekly radio program on KALW-FM, San Francisco.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement
Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
They saw it coming ...
Posted by: mmckinl on Apr 19, 2008 1:49 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Congress and the Financial Industry that is. Why, after years and years of trying and failing did the Bankruptcy Bill pass in 2005?

This Bill was supposed to backstop the coming massive credit collapse that was caused by the greed of the financial industry by turning huge numbers of Americans into debt serfs. Their plans didn't take into account enormity and scale of their own greed and now THEY are in trouble. But THEY are too big to fail so the tax payer will pick up the bill with huge public debts and serious inflation.

All Americans had better understand that the minorities are the canaries in the coal mine and that they are next, they will bail out the bastards that caused this mess unless there is a massive protest to Congress.

I'm NOT holding my breath.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Part of the Power Elite's plan to accumulate more wealth.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 19, 2008 9:48 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It's all about GREED which has no limits.

Name a presidential candidate who understands that. There is only one: Barack Obama.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com, the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"If it's not broke, don't fix it" means...
Posted by: Sojourner on Apr 19, 2008 10:10 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...wait for the train wreck.

We have been, as they say, "sold a bill of goods." That is, we don't get the goods, just the bill. The fact that Bush's approval rating is at an historic low means nothing, since there were enough Americans to give him two terms.

Selling off the public assets to private interests has been no secret. Reagan hired his own private army to fight his own private war in Nicaragua. He remains beloved.

Instead, the enemy, we are told, is unions. How crazy can it get? So long as Americans take wealthy greedheads for our model, the craziness will continue.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

CommonDreamer
Posted by: CommonDreamer on Apr 19, 2008 10:24 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
This should not be a shock. It was the horrifying economic recipe of the plutocrats that crushed American democracy and upward mobility.

Ingredients:

1. The dumbing down of society, with no financial education - just No Child Left Behind, which doesn't begin to address the need for a functional citizenry (read: financially educated, politically and civicly minded students - need that first, before anything else).

2. Subprime wages brought to bear by unhindered market pressure, regressive tax cuts, the grossly over-empowered financial industry, and the depression of unions - on purpose.

3. Tax cuts which enabled the very wealthy to drive up the price of everything and to set standards out of touch with the limits of every day Americans' incomes. (Read: unafforable, "luxury" housing). The only luxury wages are at the top....but everyone built "luxury" housing, not housing that addressed the needs of varied incomes.

4. Rampant consumerism as sport - and keeping up with the Jones' mentality - what you have is more important than who you are or what you do - this was pushed upon people who were not taught to resist this amoral sophistry.

5. Poor lending practices that do nothing to ameliorate the fact that wages for median and under income Americans are simply subprime - and housing was way over prime in cost - and no crazy home loan is going to fix that.

6. Corporatocracy taking over in every way, trampling the little guy, crushing creativity (look at what's played on your radio - the same four songs by Beyonce, Jay-Z, Ashlee Simpson and 50 Cent - over and over.

7. Bogus economic policy dependent upon false inflation of assets and rampant borrowing - not in line with sensible policies such as saving, having living wages, progressive taxes, and so on.

8. No family values or morals evident in this administration - only the gross accumulation of money for oneself and the highest standards of selfishness are promoted. Every man for himself - not a democracy by any means.

9. Most importantly, where are the activists? Who outlawed anger? Remember when Howard Dean was pilloried for being angry? It's what they wanted...the dumbed down consumer struggling to buy his overpriced Soma (read: i-Pod)...just stick it in your ear, don't get angry, don't pay attention and everything will be just fine. It's this kind of thinking (or non-thinking, if you will) that has enabled the plutocratic looters to take hold in America and to undermine decades of progress.

Put it all together and you have a big overdone souffle of nothing but hot air - with no wages to prop it up and senselessly inflated assets that bear no relation to what the average consumer can afford.

Can we really afford 4 more years of this travesty and sophistry at the hands of the finance industry and at the hands of a government by and for the rich?

The answer is no of course. Maybe in November people will be angry enough - when they see how they've been duped, taken and crushed...to get to the pols and throw out this mercenary facist government. We need to bring Democracy back - for all citizens, not just the lucky few.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

RE: So far it is the giant lenders that are being saved.
Posted by: klumberg on Apr 19, 2008 8:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The money wasn't given to JP Morgan by the USA gov't but by the Federal Reserve which is NOT A GOVERNMENT ENTITY. The Federal Reserve is a private banking cabal. If you want to learn all about how the financial system works, I suggest you read "The Creature from Jekyll Island" by G. Edward Griffin. There is also a great Youtube video set on money. If you do a Youtube search for "Corrupt Banking System" it will spell it out. It's animated and in four or five parts that are about 10 minutes each.

I'm presently reading about the Populist movement in the late 1800's in Howard Zinn's "Peoples History of the United States" and have found that conditions during that time were identical to what we are facing today. There was a depression involved in the 1890's. It's also worth looking at.

I believe that we need to put pressure on the Democrats via the Democratic party to make them more radical and responsive to the working people. Join the party, go to meetings, speak your mind, educate your peers.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Americans Would Rather Rail Against Public Welfare
Posted by: desidid on Apr 19, 2008 6:29 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
than corporate welfare. Last election several pro war republicans lost because Americans don't favor the war. Yet John McCain is running basically a pro war campaign again. Why, because he doesn't respect the opinion of the majority of Americans. This disrespect is widespread among members of the House and Senate. It encourages them to continue to support corporations with public money in times of economic crisis. Until we vote our interest, we will continue to produce candidates whose policies spite us.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

the banks wouldn't let me...
Posted by: eosrk on Apr 19, 2008 8:50 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
own an house, or even attain a credit card when my credit was good....but boy oh boy do they throw countless of home offers and credit cards at me now, espically after the divorce....and all I have to say to the banks is........THANK GOD I DON'T OWN BOTH, ESPICALLY NOW, WHEN THEY'RE GOING DOWN!!

and I have no feelings about it either, so stop sending me pre-approved credit and pre-approved home loans, for they're always either being sredded in the trash can or being deleted from my e-mails daily!!!!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Let's face it, folks
Posted by: willymack on Apr 20, 2008 9:40 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
None of this is actually new; it's just a lot worse than in the past. We STILL have the singular inability to seperate good people from evil ones, and consistently vote the evil ones into high office, or do NOTHING when elections are stolen from us. It may well be too late for us if we permit this evil to happen AGAIN in 2008.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Just the facts
Posted by: gellero1 on Apr 20, 2008 12:27 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Perhaps if we didn't have millions of ' undocumented aliens '....AKA Illegals, there wouldn't be wage depression and some work for the black community with jobs 'Americans won't do'.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

rn
Posted by: mnatra on Apr 20, 2008 9:47 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Regular people are really going to suffer too.
Minorities may seek the crime rout as they have done in the past...., which was bad enough in good times, What about the hard times for all of us....The prisons will swell.
We really need to hold those sub prime institutions accountable now by forcing them to pay up to these people foreclosed upon..
Good Article.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Advertisement
Advertisement