Home
Archive
Columnists
Video
Blogs
Discuss
About
Search
Donate
Advertise
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Register to Vote: Rock the Vote, powered by Working Assets Wireless
Advertisement
  • AlterNetYour turn

Support AlterNet
Do you value the information you're getting from AlterNet? Please show your support with a tax-deductible donation.


Feedback
Tell us how we're doing.

Revealed: The Cartoonishly Racist Faked Memoir That Duped the NY Times

By John Gorenfeld, AlterNet. Posted April 19, 2008.


Love and Consequences was quickly yanked off the shelves after it was revealed to be a fake, but we got our hands on a copy.

Share and save this post:
Digg iconDelicious iconReddit iconFark iconYahoo! iconNewsvine! iconFacebook iconNewsTrust icon

More stories by John Gorenfeld

Get AlterNet in
your mailbox!

 
Advertisement

Last month, it was revealed that the New York Times and Manhattan publishing world were deceived by Love and Consequences, a faked memoir by a white girl who claimed to live the life you only hear about in Dr. Dre songs. The damage control was so good, the book never saw daylight, and we never knew how big of an embarrassment this cartoonishly racist gangster fantasy should have been. But last week a copy arrived at my doorstep.

Supposedly written by gangsta moll Margaret B. Jones, Love and Consequences turned out to be the work of middle-class liar Margaret Seltzer. She had invented the tale behind a laptop at Starbucks, tricking not only her publisher, but also her fans at the Times, which graced the memoir with repeated coverage.

After it was revealed her work was a forgery, the damage control was swift and successful. On March 5, with the book just out the door, the New York Times revealed the hoax, if not just how bad it was. Her agent, Faye Bender, told the paper, reassuringly, that "there was no reason to doubt her, ever." And that set the tone for the coverage. Love & Consequences, wrote the L.A. Times, must have seemed "edgy, sexy, cinematic."

Except it's not. As a true story, this book would have been less about "love" and more about crude racial stereotypes. As a hoax, it reads as easily the laziest forgery ever to receive a six-figure advance and a rave review in the Times.

In an important sense, the real scandal was never discovered. Thanks to the book's speedy recall, we missed what should worry everyone: the catastrophic failure of the New York Times's B.S. detectors, which we thought they tuned up after the twin factual fiascos of Jayson Blair and Judith Miller.

Copies are going for $78 online, but one slipped through the blockade. So here, for the first time, are the Cliffs Notes.

Chapter One: Lost

Year: Unknown. Margaret B. Jones watches her friend, "Kraziak," bite the dust in a hail of AK-47 bullets. This is what we call in media res-opening mid-story.

In this passage, which the Times excerpted, Seltzer places herself in a ghetto battlefield that could have been a video game mission in Grand Theft Auto: San Andreas. "We were smoking niggas," she concludes, after spilling a 40-ounce bottle of malt liquor for a dead comrade, "sending them to heaven every day."

Tipping the 40: almost every under-35 hipster, stoner, or frat boy on a liquor run has at one time trivialized important social problems by joshing about this fabled street rite. Here this Caucasian joke is made flesh, as the amber liquid burns Jones' throat. A "big homie smiled at me," she recalls, "and then slipped the remaining cups over the neck of the Hennessey bottle ..."

Easily the strongest writing. From here on it speeds downhill, and the story becomes less believable.

Chapter Two: The hand you are dealt

Flash back to around 1979. Jones is an innocent toddler in foster care who loves Make Way For Ducklings but is shell-shocked from dimly described sexual abuse. The transition into G-life is hazy. Here she introduces a major theme, an excuse for the oddly psychologically flat tone of the book, its lack of introspection. Turns out she has PTSD, and is too stunned by life! "If I couldn't feel it," she writes, "it couldn't hurt me."

Chapter Three: Start from scratch

1982. Margaret ticks off L.A. highways as she's driven to her new home in the vicinity of Slauson and Central avenues, but the journey sounds more Mapquest than memory. Then, with the arrival of Margaret's new caretaker, Big Mom, the narrative detours from N.W.A.'s Greatest Hits territory into the world of Aunt Jemima fantasies. It doesn't take an African-American Studies major to get bad vibes from the stereotypical treatment of the saintly mammy. Big Mom has no interests of her own; she wears an austere white dress on the book cover, calls everyone "child," and asks the Lord: "I know you don't give me more than I can handle, but please, sweet Jesus, help me with these youngstas."


Digg!

See more stories tagged with: love and consequences, new york times, margaret b. seltzer

John Gorenfeld is the author of Bad Moon Rising and the writer of a new short film, The King of America.

Liked this story? Get top stories in your inbox each week from AlterNet! Sign up now »


Advertisement

 

Comments Turn comments off sitewide Give us feedback »
Comments closed.
The comments for this story have been closed. Thank you to everyone who participated.
View:
What do we expect? in this.......
Posted by: The Big Raven on Apr 19, 2008 5:28 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Racist country? No really how could this drivel pass any publishers as a book?america lives in a fairy tale world where every person of "color"is dicribed in violence while white america sucks up the fake fear just like fake war lies so they can "justify" thier shitty fearmongering behavior. boo theres a mad blackman under your bed again! suckas!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why do these people keep getting suckered?
Posted by: hagwind on Apr 19, 2008 5:59 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Yet another faked memoir! So this one was caught before it won the Pulitzer Prize or got made into a movie -- so effing what? I'm supposed to be impressed by the dupes' ability to police themselves?

Margaret Seltzer, like her predecessors, had plenty of incentive to lie: Money! Fame! A published book! What I don't understand is why these agents and publishers and newspapers keep getting suckered, especially as the list of previous suckers gets longer and longer. Doesn't the possibility even occur to them that the latest too-bad-to-be-true tale is, well, too bad to be true?

In trying to understand this, I went back to "Women and Honor: Some Notes on Lying," a 1975 essay by the great lesbian feminist poet Adrienne Rich. It's about lying and truth telling between individuals, but like all of Rich's work it has powerful political implications. And what she says about the individual liar seems to hold true for these agents and publishers and eminent book reviewers:

"Lies are usually attempts to make everything simpler -- for the liar -- than it really is, or ought to be."

"The liar in her terror wants to fill up the void, with anything. Her lies are a denial of her fear: a way of maintaining control."


These powerful liars are maintaining control all right. They've decided what's true and what's real, and that's what they're going to sell us. When I think of all the better, truer, and realer stories that never get read because of the cowardly ignorance of these powerful liars, I get really, really angry.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

A thing about the N.Y. Times B.S. detector. . .
Posted by: thoughtcriminal on Apr 19, 2008 6:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
They had to get rid of it - it kept going off every time the senior editors and reporters walked past - embarrassing, you know. Apparently it was really pissing Michael Gordon and Judith Miller off during their Iraqi WMD reporting - and then one day they brought it over to the corporate offices, and the thing just screamed - and that was that.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Shit.
Posted by: Longdream on Apr 19, 2008 8:39 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Again I say, I'm in the wrong business.

*takes laptop, goes to Starbucks, opens The Urban White Man's Guide to the Koran*

"Jamal never knew his red-haired Irish father. On the day his mother, a dusky beauty who sold vegetables in the Shahidan market didn't come home, he vowed............"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: Shit. Posted by: whathaway
» RE: yes! yes! go on Posted by: bitsfick
» RE: Shit. Posted by: bcgirl125
» RE: Oooooh! FANS! Posted by: Longdream
The New York Times
Posted by: frank69 on Apr 19, 2008 11:06 AM   
Current rating: 5    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
The NYT is a mere shadow of its former self. Nothing the NYT does or says should surprise anyone. The Times sucks!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

» RE: The New York Times Posted by: 8 nontheist
"Margaret B. Jones" interviewed on NPR
Posted by: 2partydrag on Apr 19, 2008 11:11 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I'm pretty sure it was "Day to Day" or one of those call in shows... it was odd and one big fib fest. She simplified things a little too much. At one point, a caller quizzed her about her loyalty to her "O.G.". She copped out by saying that she could write a whole book about him and it still wouldn't be able to explain her relationship with him. She also talked down to the callers and the interviewer with this, "i'm from the streets, you're not, therefore you can never understand" attitude which fluctuated depending on the difficulty of the question. I wasn't too surprised to hear that it was a hoax. Her dialect was a little too forced.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Stealth prejudice: One reason the Times got duped.
Posted by: HughScott on Apr 19, 2008 11:19 AM   
Current rating: 4    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Having been raised in the South (TX, LA, FL), I can smell the faintest whiff of bigotry -- albeit from TV media people or newspaper editorial boards.

From my encounters over the years (I'm 72), educated Americans are often racist. They're just better at disguising it than us common folk.

Stealth prejudice is also one reason why Barack Obama has been attacked for the most unimportant of things, such as not wearing a flag pin. The allegations are nothing more than excuses to keep a black man from becoming president.

Hugh E. Scott, Vietnam vet, ex-USAF pilot, lifelong registered Republican, Obama supporter and the editor of www.PhonyFighterPilot.com, the only website about George W. Bush that presents irrefutable, smoking-gun proof of White House corruption.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

After the coup is complete and we becom a white empire.
Posted by: nightgaunt on Apr 19, 2008 11:26 AM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
I will expect the hoax "LOVE & CONSEQUENCES" to be a classic of the Aryan Christian Imperials as they soak up the 'reality' of a bygone alien world.Since all of the 'coloreds' would have been moved into their own Homelands by then.

When people live a lie the lies are better and more interesting than reality they will accept them with alacrity. If they can believe in an invisible white father,they can believe this crock of hooie.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

DAILY miseries & misfortunes & abuses JUST ARE GOOD ENOUGH...
Posted by: BlueBerry PickN on Apr 19, 2008 1:01 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...to make anybody give a fuck...
isn't that a simply lovely social commentary?

Did anybody give a damn about anti-WTO / NAU / SPP protesters getting a beat down?

nope.

Did anybody give a damn about starving or 'FrankenFood fed' children in under-funded local schools?

nope.

Did anybody give a damn about *sordidly everyday* miseries in our communities?
Did anybody give a damn about Oaxaca? How about Rwanda??

Hell no.

But make is a sexy, glossy tale... fiction is more interesting!!

How many times do we have to read about this crap before we start realizing that truly, there is a WAR on the WORKERS?

That the US is **crafting gang conflict** to keep us from organizing?
Did anybody really wonder HOW IT IS that WEST COAST GANGS & EAST COAST GANGS were mysteriously put @ each others' throats...??

...separated by a swath of prairies & Rockies populated by impoverished First Nations & middle-lower class white folks terrified the 'non-Whites' were coming 'get what we got'? ... just fucking convenient, eh?

That's just not interesting ENOUGH is it?

simply not fucking interesting enough... LET'S HAVE FICTION!
The kind of fiction that makes race conflict & misery just a little more dramatic than its daily horrors..


~~~
Spread Love...

BlueBerry Pick'n
can be found @
ThisCanadian com
~~~
"We, two, form a Multitude" ~ Ovid.
~~~
"Silent Freedom is Freedom Silenced"
"do no harm"

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

one or two examples
Posted by: e rice on Apr 19, 2008 7:26 PM   
Current rating: 3    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
would have been sufficient to establish that this fraud was racist. why go on and on? is it the same impulse that holds up endless examples of sleaze in order to condemn it? sort of having your cake and eating it. the result is crummy.

i skipped the second page because i don't need my mind polluted with excessive examples of insanity and dishonesty.

publishers will print anything they think will make them a huge profit. no more little profits from well written books. because 'the consumer' doesn't want them.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

"Turns out black people don't even want to be white!"
Posted by: GretnaBlast on Apr 19, 2008 8:12 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
good stuff

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why....
Posted by: morticia on Apr 19, 2008 8:44 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
...didn't she just publish it as fiction?

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

The Consequences of two different Margarets leaves no Love
Posted by: structurequity on Apr 20, 2008 10:35 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
To reflect on a life of such externalized memory without internalized angst or introspection and place it into words is worthy but for one major problemo! All the argot of a way of life does not a person make if no word of being comes forth except what has been stylized into marketable ease with no questions asked by author or filterers. The insult is that it was published and not to the Times but to the people portrayed without dimension through one Margaret's ability to make up T shirt slogans about another Margaret's life; NOT! So, who are the people responsible for such an investment in lies. To Walk the Walk, be sure of the Talk and vice versa.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

titillating nonsense
Posted by: luzmejor on Apr 25, 2008 10:04 AM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
It always sells well.

Publishers are going for the quick cash lately, like everyone else in America. But they don't want to be accused of being so gauche as to publish frank porn.

This so-called book was the ideal stealth substitute.

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Why was this article even published?
Posted by: Babygoat on Apr 26, 2008 1:13 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
Maybe no one saw the paper today where the three NYC cops shot 50 bullets into Shawn Bell after his bachelor party, The cops got off, they'd been on paid leave during the trial. They weren't even convicted on "excessive force". ---50 BULLETS againest an unarmed man. They thought he might have had a gun!

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]

Argosy
Posted by: Urban Myth #3 on Apr 27, 2008 1:16 PM   
Current rating: Not yet rated    [1 = poor; 5 = excellent]
So Label the thing "Fiction" and publish it anyway - personally I find congenital liars fascinating.
I well remember the Famed Tibetan Monk/Author, T. Lobsang Rampa and the fuss that was made when it was discovered he was an Englishman who drank Beer and ate Fish 'n Chips - didn't make the tale of that Philosophy any less authentic - just the writer was a phony - but the books were great!
Look at it this way - while people are reading they are carbon neutral - can't go drunk-driving or husband beating - it's a win/win deal for society.
Gee - look at L Ron Hubbard - made it all up and the Bank Accounts that are lined up with his work make the whole thing truly astounding...

[« Reply to this comment] [Post a new comment »] [Rate this comment: 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5]